The Minister is aware that the super bug, MRSA, is rampant in acute hospitals. I am aware of cases where people died after they contracted MRSA in acute hospitals. People are afraid that they will contract this disease, which can be fatal, after they are admitted to acute hospitals.
I understand a number of operations have been postponed in an acute hospital in Dublin. It is extremely costly to deal with MRSA because wards must be isolated and patients who contract the bug require great care and attention. I bring this to the Minister's attention because it is a bug for which there is no known cure. I understand also that, in many instances, it is contracted through open wounds, particularly by those who have had operations and who are susceptible to it.
I have been informed by people in University Hospital in Cork that, at any given time, there could be ten to 20 people within that hospital suffering from this bug, a problem which manifests itself in all acute hospitals nationwide.
While the Department has issued guidelines, some of the difficulties to which this infection gives rise are only now becoming apparent. For example, this week I was contacted by the family of a terminally ill person who contracted this MRSA in an acute hospital. The hospital discharged the person to a nursing home where the medical staff discovered that the patient had contracted this super bug. It is extremely expensive for a nursing home to deal with somebody who has contracted MRSA, isolation being part and parcel of the treatment. Therefore, it will clearly be seen that financial difficulties attend the care of such a patient in a nursing home.
Over and above all of this, I have now discovered that nursing homes are not anxious, and some are unwilling, to accommodate people suffering from this bug on their premises. Within the Southern Health Board area, while the patient about whom I speak was admitted to a nursing home, medical staff of the Southern Health Board visited the nursing home and suggested it was not appropriate for that patient to be cared for there because of the danger of spreading the bug within the home itself: therein lies the dilemma.
Having spoken to nursing home proprietors I know they are particularly concerned about possible litigation in the event of a spread of MRSA within a nursing home. No doubt this will lead to an increased dilemma as owners of nursing homes become aware of the problematic nature of this bug and will be unhappy to receive patients who have contracted it.
The dilemma for the Minister and acute hospitals is that, since these patients must receive medical care in isolation, they will have to remain in acute hospitals much longer than necessary to deal with the complaint for which they were originally admitted.
My question relates to the establishment of a national surveillance monitoring unit. The Minister will have had a report on his desk on it for well over 12 months. The relevant study group recommended its immediate establishment. This is important for the control of this super bug, establishment of the numbers suffering from it, its impact on the operations of acute hospitals in addition to monitoring the extent of meningit is and other diseases of that nature.
I do not want to raise unnecessary fears. I have been informed by medical people that, by and large, the bug which can be fatal in some cases, and can be less than harmful in many others. Therefore, it is crucial that the Department establish this national surveillance monitoring unit immediately to restore confidence among staffs in nursing homes and in patients' medical care, demonstrating that some pertinent action is being taken in an endeavour to establish the origins of this bug and effectively control it.