Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 5 Nov 1997

Vol. 482 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Rathowen (Westmeath) Drainage Works.

I will share my time with Deputy McGrath.

This is a matter of concern to the people of Rathowen and the surrounding areas, including my home area. Glen Lake is a lake of approximately 50 hectares situated on the WestmeathLongford border. It is a designated special protection area and one of the most important over-wintering sites in the country for geese, ducks and swans. It has been subject to years of study and recording of various interested private and State bodies.

The lake is, therefore, of national and international importance as an over-wintering habitat for migrating water fowl. Its importance has been recognised under Irish and European law, having been designated a national heritage area and a special protection area which effectively means it is afforded special protection under EU Directive 79-409.

In the middle of September and since then, the Office of Public Works undertook work which resulted in cutting and deepening the old drainage channels into the drainage systems of the lake. The Office of Public Works maintains an obligation to maintain the drainage scheme under the Arterial Drainage Act, 1945.

It is years since such maintenance works were undertaken on this lake. There is a fear among committed local people, who constitute the Rathowen Community Development Company Limited, that the water level will fall and destroy essential wildlife habitats with further loss of endangered wildlife fowl. Since its foundation, the community group has recognised the importance of this great natural asset and has in its plans for the reinvigoration of this rural area a development plan which cost approximately £10,000 to prepare.

Since it was drained many years ago, the lake is flooded in periods of high rainfall, providing a perfect habitat for over-wintering fowl. Approximately 50 per cent of the Icelandic population of whooper swans come to Ireland every winter and 40 per cent of those arrive at Glen Lake because the habitat has everything they need. The view of the National Parks and Wildlife Service, which is attached to the Department of Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands, is that this lake is an important bird habitat worthy of conservation and should be conserved.

The work undertaken on Glen Lake raises concerns from the point of view of the National Parks and Wildlife Service. It should not have taken place in the absence of consultation between the Office of Public Works, the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the local Rathowen Community Development Association. I also understand that the National Parks and Wildlife Service is drafting a management scheme for this area and, accordingly, the possibility of conflict is evident in the works of the Office of Public Works and the management proposals of the National Parks and Wildlife Service in the absence of consultation and agreement.

It is clear that the Office of Public Works considers it has a statutory responsibility to fulfil and maintain all drainage channels resulting from arterial drainage schemes. The National Parks and Wildlife Service has a statutory responsibility to protect the conservation values which led to the designation of Glen Lough as a special protection area under the EU Birds Directive.

It is essential to ensure that any work undertaken is compatible with the wildlife interests on the lake. The Office of Public Works says it is doing maintenance work only, namely, clearing weeds and silt from the river. However, it appears that the channel leading out from the lake has been widened by at least one foot or more and the river bed has been similarly deepened. This results in a major increase in the cross sectional area of the water channel, which in turn increases the water flow by an amount which makes it nearly impossible for the water level to rise as the water flows out of the lake as quickly as it flows in.

If the water level rises it falls back at an increased rate and so cannot keep a body of water in the lake for any reasonable time. The result will be a drying out of the lake bed with a negative impact on the existing wetland habitat. If anybody proposes to undertake work on a special protection area or a national heritage area which has an area of 15 hectares or more an environmental assessment must be undertaken. I understand that the Office of Public Works is undertaking a hydrological survey which will identify the implications, if any, of the present drainage maintenance programme for the status of the Glen Lough as a special protection area for birds. The local people are concerned that the pivotal importance of this natural asset be preserved and safeguarded and that Glen Lough will continue to have an importance in the Rathowen area as a viable rural entity.

Rathowen is a small village in County Westmeath on the border with County Longford. In 1994 a vibrant Rathowen Development Association was formed to enhance and promote the area. The association has an active and enthusiastic committee of approximately 18 members and is worthy of our support. One of the aims of the association is to protect Glen Lough.

Glen Lough is a small area near Athlone. It is a lake in the winter months and reverts to a wetland in the summer months. It is a marshy habitat of great ecological interest and a wintering site for geese, ducks and swans. It was designated in accordance with the council directive on the conservation of wild birds as a special protection area. It is one of only 35 lakes in Ireland that have received this designation. It is also protected under the EU natural habitats directives.

The National Parks and Wildlife Service has a statutory responsibility to protect this area. Unfortunately, the Office of Public Works also has a statutory obligation to maintain drainage in the area. Recent drainage works by the Office of Public Works, which widened and deepened the water canals, will increase by as much as 50 per cent the outflow of water from the lough. The consequences of that were outlined by my colleague, Deputy Penrose.

Local people contend that this was not routine work, but rather more extensive drainage work that will have catastrophic consequences for this special protection area. They question whether an environmental impact assessment was needed before any work was done since the area affected is more than 15 hectares in size. There was no consultation with them, nor with the National Parks and Wildlife Service.

The solution to the interest of conflicting statutory bodies lies in the position of a sluice to control water levels in Glen Lough. It is achievable and the two State agencies - the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the Office of Public Works - can combine and co-operate to provide this solution.

I tabled a number of parliamentary questions on this matter. However, because I was unhappy with the answers I received my colleague and I submitted this matter for this Adjournment Debate. I hope the reply by the Minister of State will not contain a rehash of the replies to the parliamentary questions, but rather that he will make positive proposals on how a reasonable solution can be reached to restore Glen Lough as a natural wildlife habitat.

I thank the Deputies for raising this issue. It appears to be generating much debate in the Lough Glen area.

The question of the effects of drainage on the Lough Glen area has been the subject of a number of parliamentary questions which I recently answered. I will try to acquaint those Members unfamiliar with the matter of the position.

Lough Glen, or Glen Lough as it is shown on the official ordnance survey map, is situated within the Inny Catchment Drainage Scheme in County Westmeath. Under the Arterial Drainage Act, 1945, the Commissioners of Public Works undertook drainage works to the River Inny which were completed in 1968. Under section 37 of the Act, the commissioners are statutorily obliged to maintain the drainage works "in proper repair and effective condition".

Since the completion of the drainage scheme maintenance works were undertaken in the Lough Glen area on three occasions prior to 1995 — in 1976, 1980 and 1991-92 - these works had no detrimental effect as they did not prevent the designation of the area as a special protection area for birds in 1995 by the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands.

Following further maintenance of the drainage works in the area this year, concern was expressed by a local group who felt that they would have a detrimental effect on the special protection area and would destroy the work carried out by the wildlife service. The maintenance works undertaken in 1997 were routine and did not vary significantly from previous works. Initial survey information has confirmed that there is no change in the outfall control level to the Lough Glen area.

However, to ensure that there is no worsening of conditions and that my statutory obligations as Minister of State with responsibility for the Office of Public Works and those of my colleague, the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands are met, the House can be assured that there will be continued co-operation between the two organisations. To this end, we are already working together to draw up an agreed management scheme for the future of the area. I hope this will meet the requirement and concerns raised by the Deputies and the people in the area.

Top
Share