I assume Deputy Higgins has in mind an official inquiry into those aspects of the Garda handling of the matter which were the subject of criticisms, expressed or implied, in the judgment to which he referred. Before I deal with those criticisms it is only right to draw attention to the positive aspects of the judgment from a law enforcement point of view, in particular, the vindication of the Garda Síochána in its decision to seek essential evidential material in this case and then to proceed by way of section 64 rather than section 63 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1994. This retains the advantages to be gained from section 64 in the pursuit of the ill-gotten gains of modern day ruthless criminals, especially those involved in the sale and supply of drugs.
During the recent debate on my Department's Supplementary Estimate I indicated to the Deputy my concern about aspects of the court's judgment and my intention to seek a full report from the Garda Commissioner. The Garda Commissioner has informed me that it is his strict policy to preserve the privacy of individuals. He has informed me that practically every day of the year the gardaí behave, and Garda Press Office personnel respond, in a way which ensures this policy is adhered to. Nevertheless, the court found, as a matter of probability, that the leak of information regarding the proposed search of the premises emanated from a Garda source.
The Garda Commissioner has advised me that informal inquiries were conducted by the Garda authorities to establish the source of the leak, an approach which, according to the advice I have received, can be more successful on occasion than the more formal inquiry. Because of the finding of the court and because of the commissioner's overall concern about this judgment, he has appointed a senior officer to investigate the matter thoroughly.