We need radical reform of our existing policies on human resource development and the foundation laid by my predecessor in the White Paper on Human Resources is where we should begin. As I told the House previously, that is why a small group was established last autumn, shortly after I took up office, between my Department and the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs, because the two Departments must work closely together. The Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs deals with the clients who are unemployed and on the live register and it is the responsibility of my Department to create and sustain jobs and to provide training problems to ensure more people can gain access to jobs. That is the priority.
This year we will spend £750 million on various measures to encourage people from welfare to work. That is a substantial amount of money and we must ensure we are spending it in the right place. As the Deputy knows, a number of skills shortages have arisen in the economy, particularly in the electronic and software sectors, the high-tech end of the economy. As a fire brigade measure the Government had to take radical steps on gaining office to ensure we had the supply of skills necessary for the emerging jobs, because companies were beginning to wonder whether they could continue to invest in Ireland if we were not going to have people with suitable skills. That is why the £250 million fund was established over a three year period to ensure we have a ready supply of people with skills for emerging jobs. This year there are an extra 2,000 people on various education programmes, such as PLC, institute of technology and university courses being trained and equipped with the skills for the emerging jobs.
Notwithstanding that, there are clearly pressures on small to medium sized industry and that is one reason we are taking the industry support services from FÁS and putting them into the new indigenous agency which will be created by July. If we are to support it correctly and help it grow, develop and compete in the more competitive environment after EMU, it is essential that training is part of the package of support which Government gives to industry. If training is provided by a different agency from the one which is providing grant aid to allow companies to grow, which is also different from the one which supports companies in the export market, we are taking a diffuse approach which does not get the best results.
The Deputy wants to change the three year rule because someone out of work for that period has difficulties. There is a dilemma in that regard because in so far as the State has resources to spend — and they are considerable, as I said earlier — it is important that we target the long-term unemployed. Only 11 per cent of those in that group go on training courses and the longer one is out of work the more difficult it is to have access to employment opportunities. In the context of the review being carried out my priority is to ensure resources are targeted at the long-term unemployed. It is not necessary to exclude others and we clearly cannot do that but one wonders whether the State should spend money through its training agency on people with third level or university qualifications — and in some case postgraduate qualifications — rather than on the long-term unemployed. The dilemma is that the person with higher qualifications has a better opportunity to gain employment but one could argue that regardless of the State's training programme those with high qualifications will get employment opportunities in any event. The working group of my Department and the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs will report shortly about the way forward on these matters. It is intended to implement the White Paper's recommendations.