Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 2 Apr 1998

Vol. 489 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Property Speculation.

(Dublin West): The phenomenon whereby 20 to 50 per cent of new housing units coming on to the market are being purchased not by people wishing to live in them but by people planning to rent them at exorbitant rents has been recently highlighted. A variant of that speculation in the housing market is that speculators have been turning their attention to local authority estates. Typical of how this works is that so-called investors, usually from leafy suburbs, purchase houses for sale in local authority areas. They then rent them at exorbitant rents to people who cannot afford to buy their own homes and who are sometimes also on the local authority housing waiting list.

More often than not, the exorbitant rents charged by those from outside who have purchased these homes are being heavily subsidised in the case of Dublin by the Eastern Health Board. This amounts to insidious speculation in the housing market. The result is to push the price of homes in these estates way beyond the reach of young adult members of families happily settled in these estates who wish to purchase homes and live beside their parents or siblings. These young adults find themselves priced out of contention and out of any hope of purchasing a home in their local community or at all.

It adds insult to injury that taxpayers' money is funding this aspect of speculation. I understand that last year the health boards paid a massive £80 million in rent subsidies. Rented homes are obviously needed by those who have been left in the lurch by successive Governments who have not given local authorities the funds to build enough local authority housing. The fact that these taxpayer subsidies in such huge amounts go to swell the profits of the property speculators, the bankers and the building societies is nothing short of a scandal.

In Sheepmoor, a small local authority housing estate in Mulhuddart, I know of three houses on the one road which have been bought in the past few years by one family from a leafy and salubrious suburb. These houses are rented and, to my knowledge, the Eastern Health Board is subsidising the rent.

Speculators who purchase homes for investment in local authority areas and who live outside those areas, generally in comfortable circumstances, are parasites. They benefit from misery and, in turn, cause more misery by pushing the possibility of a home and a shelter beyond the reach of those who desperately need it. Successive Governments have allowed this situation to persist and have allowed speculators to run riot. First, the failure to have an emergency programme of house building in response to the suffering on the housing list is creating a situation where rents are going through the roof. Second, the carte blanche given to landowners and speculators to charge any price for building on land rezoned for housing is an outrage. Third, the total refusal and failure of successive Governments to halt the obscene profiteering in the new housing market is allowing this kind of speculation to thrive.

I demand, as a representative of working class people, some of whom are unemployed, others who are PAYE workers, that the Government take action to halt the speculation and profiteering, that this most human need for shelter and for a reasonably comfortable home is taken in hand and that the speculation and abuse is rooted out so that all people can afford to live in the comfort they deserve. That is hardly too much to ask.

I thank Deputy Higgins for raising this matter on the Adjournment. My colleague, the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment and Local Government, Deputy Molloy, is unable to be in the House to respond to this item and has asked me to do so on his behalf.

I understand that the Department of the Environment and Local Government is unaware of evidence of a specific problem relating to purchase of houses in local authority estates by investors. If a tenant purchaser of a local authority house wishes to sell their house within a period of 20 years from the date of purchase or before they have acquired full ownership, they must get the consent of the local authority. An authority may refuse to give its consent to the resale of a dwelling if the intended purchaser is not a person in need of housing or the intended sale would leave the seller, or any person residing with the seller, without adequate housing. This effectively precludes the sale of houses by tenant purchasers to investors. However, subsequent resales by owneroccupiers who buy houses from tenant purchasers cannot be restricted in this way.

The SWA rent supplementation scheme is governed by the social welfare Acts and is administered by the regional health boards, subject to overall direction, regulation and funding of the scheme by the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs. Concern has been expressed in relation to escalating costs of rent supplementation in recent years. For example, it has been suggested that needs currently being catered for under the SWA scheme could be met by expansion of the local authority housing programme. This argument does not stand up to scrutiny. The provision of additional local authority housing is unlikely to provide a cost effective, economic or appropriate means of addressing the predominantly short-term housing needs currently catered for by the SWA rent supplementation system. An estimate of £96 million is being allocated by the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs in 1998 to provide supplement rents. Even if all this amount was switched into building local authority housing it would provide in the order of 1,200-1,400 additional dwellings nationally, less if account is taken of the concentration of demand in the Dublin area. This would make negligible impact on meeting the needs of the 35,000 or so households who depend on rent supplementation from the health boards. It must also be recognised that SWA rent supplementation is a lower cost option than local authority housing for meeting the housing needs of single people, who account for the majority of rent supplement recipients.

Another issue which arises in connection with the SWA rent supplementation scheme is the question of standards of accommodation. A condition of entitlement to rent supplements is that the health board is satisfied that the residence is suited to the residential and other needs of the claimant. The question of registration of these dwellings and enforcement of standards by local authorities also arises. The Minister is concerned at the low level of registrations nationally and local authorities have been requested to actively enforce the registration regulations to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. The range of enforcement measures available would include: regular advertising of the registration requirements, carrying out inspections or other investigative procedures to identify unregistered houses, issuing individual reminders to landlords, issuing notices to landlords specifying a registration deadline and initiating prosecutions against known non-compliant landlords.

Increased co-ordination between housing authorities and the health boards is desirable in relation to SWA supplementation and the Minister would regard this as an important feature which could help with the type of issue raised by the Deputy.

Top
Share