It is estimated that there are up to 20,000 self-employed people who were over 56 years of age when PRSI was extended to the self-employed in 1988 and who are registered for PRSI purposes. As I indicated during the debate on this year's Social Welfare Bill and in recent replies to parliamentary questions, the net additional cost of paying a full rate old age contributory pension to all this group would be of the order of £50 million per annum, equivalent to a capitalised cost of some £475 million over the full period of the payments.
The £50 million estimate is based on the payment of a full rate of pension, and qualified adult allowance where applicable, to this group and takes account of the value of the free schemes. It is an estimated net cost as it assumes that about half of the group could already be in receipt of another social welfare payment, for example, a non-contributory old age pension.
A pro rata factor has not been included in the £50 million cost estimate. While such an approach would, of course, reduce the overall cost, it is clear that the cost is still significant and could only be considered in a budgetary context where the proposal would have to be assessed against other competing demands in the social welfare area.
As I said on a number of occasions, I will continue to ensure the broadest possible contributory pension cover to as many categories as possible.
The condition that a person must have entered insurance at least ten years before pension age before he or she is eligible to qualify for the old age contributory pension has been a feature of the scheme since it was introduced in 1961. The purpose of this condition is to ensure that entitlement to the pension is limited to those who have made a reasonable level of contributions to the social insurance fund during their careers.
This ten year condition was supported by the National Pensions Board and it is considered to be a reasonable condition. The amendment in the Social Welfare Act, 1997, regarding the payment of refund of contributions to this group effectively re-emphasised the position of the ten year test.
I assure the House that any self-employed person who has contributed and does not qualify for either a contributory or a non-contributory pension receives a refund of the pension element — 53 per cent — of his-her PRSI contributions with interest, which is a fair arrangement.
I have indicated before but it is important to repeat, a person may be entitled to a non-contributory pension, subject to a means test.
In relation to the case to which the Deputy refers, the position is that the person's application for an old age contributory pension was refused as the person was over age 56 on entering PRSI. The person's claim for non-contributory pension which is payable subject to a means test, is currently being investigated. If the person fails to qualify for a non-contributory pension he-she will be entitled to a refund of the pension portion of their contributions.