Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 30 Jun 1998

Vol. 493 No. 3

Written Answers. - Communications Masts.

John McGuinness

Question:

392 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if his Department will investigate the provision of a mast at the Garda station, Dominic Street, Kilkenny, to determine if the proposal is in breach of the guidelines and criteria in view of the fact that the mast location is adjacent to a large housing estate and school; the number of users the proposed mast can facilitate; his views on whether this proposal will seriously affect the value of property in the area and is a serious health risk to students and residents; if he will insist on withdrawing the application in view of the circumstances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [15988/98]

The position in relation to this matter is that Esat Digifone, the second mobile phone operator, approached the Garda Síochána with a proposal to co-locate their equipment on certain Garda radio masts or sites. The Garda station at Dominic Street was included on the list of sites of interest to the company.

In accordance with the desire to avoid a proliferation of such masts and to promote the sharing of masts by different operators, as recommended in the Department of the Environment Guidelines for Planning Authorities concerning Telecommunications Antennae and Support Structures, the previous Government approved the proposal, subject to the company complying fully with planning requirements, health and safety legislation, the Radiological Protection Act and all relevant guidelines which may be set down from time to time by the International Radiation Protection Association.

The Deputy will therefore appreciate that careful and detailed consideration was given to the company's proposal and that the agreement with the company is designed to ensure full protection to the public and the environment. Should any doubt arise in this regard it would be a matter for the relevant planning authority and the office of the director of telecommunications regulation to consider. In this regard, I understand that the proposed development at Dominic Street will require planning permission. Therefore, residents in the area will have the opportunity to voice their objections to the relevant planning authority at the appropriate time. Under the terms of the contract with Digifone, except for a contravention by them of any of the conditions mentioned above, I am not at liberty to refuse them access.

Top
Share