Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 20 Oct 1998

Vol. 495 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Residential Care.

I welcome the opportunity to raise this important issue of residential places for persons with a learning disability, particularly in the Eastern Health Board region. I thank the Minister for coming into the House to reply.

As the Minister will be aware, there are waiting lists in all of the health board regions but nothing like the scale of those in the Eastern Health Board area. A particular cause for concern is the fact that, despite promises by successive Governments to clear waiting lists, the lists are growing and the indications are that they will reach crisis proportions if immediate action is not taken.

The number of persons now requiring immediate admission is 528, an increase of 80 on last year. Therefore, despite commitments given to systematically reduce this backlog, it is clear that the funding available annually is simply not sufficient to stabilise the list, much less clear it.

Each year, as the Minister is aware, there are unforeseen emergency admissions for a number of reasons, for instance, the death or ill health of a carer. Increasingly, children are born with multiple handicaps and survive birth due to better medical care. These children require an ongoing level of care which would be impossible in the ordinary family home, and they go from hospital into residential care where the necessary back-up services — 24 hour care, supervision and medical care — are available.

With the number of emergency cases rising, and the cost per capita of their care also rising, we have a situation in the Eastern Health Board where most of next year's expected additional allocation is already committed and, as a result, no inroads will be made into the list. These adults and children have to be provided for but the reality for those on the waiting list is that they simply stay on the list with their prospect of admission diminishing each year.

Outlining statistics and talking about waiting lists masks the reality of these people's lives. Behind each of these 528 families is a story of extreme human misery, ongoing distress and complete exhaustion which comes with giving 24 hour care on a continuous basis. These people are not reneging on their responsibilities or seeking to be a burden on the taxpayer. In most cases they are very elderly people, widows or widowers, who have devoted their whole lives to the care of their handicapped children and now, in their old age, they find they cannot get a place for their children.

I fully recognise that providing a place for a handicapped person is expensive but it is a finite problem. If the Minister dealt with this backlog there would be sufficient beds in the system to provide for each year's emergencies simply through natural wastage.

A parents' federation was formed recently and its members had a meeting with the Minister for Finance to seek funding for residential places; I understand those parents got an unsympathetic hearing. I appreciate there are many calls on the public purse but taxpayers do not want a reduction in their tax at the expense of these parents.

Having devoted their whole lives to the care of their children, these parents should not have to face old age not knowing what will happen to their sons or daughters after their death. They are currently facing that uncertainty and dying with it. This is evidenced by the fact that a siblings group has now been formed. The sisters and brothers are now taking over the responsibility of care from their parents. It is neither right nor just that parents or siblings have to squander their precious resources and reserves of energy lobbying Ministers, TDs, councillors and health boards to get care for their relatives. It is our job to provide that for them and it is a shame on all of us that it has not been done.

I ask the Minister to do all he can in the forthcoming budget to provide as much funding as possible to clear the backlog and end this scandal once and for all.

I thank the Deputy for putting down this matter on the Adjournment and giving me an opportunity to comment on it.

My Department's Assessment of Need for Services for Persons with a Mental Handicap, 1997-2001, which is based on information from the national intellectual disability database, provides information on the current and future needs of persons with a mental handicap.

That assessment identified a requirement of 1,439 new residential/respite places and 1,036 new day places over the period in question. It is estimated that the cost of providing these services is in the region of £63.5 million over that period and continuing thereafter at that increased level of funding.

I was pleased to allocate additional funding of £21 million in 1998 to continue the process of delivering the services identified in the assessment of need. This funding, which includes £10.75 million in revenue and £5.25 million funding from the new national capitation programme, is being used to meet identified needs in existing services and provide new residential and day care places.

The capacity of existing facilities to absorb the additional places in the coming years and to provide the specialist services for disturbed clients is now limited. A programme of building is essential to deliver the volume and quality of services required. Late last year, I announced a major national capital programme of £30 million, the first time people with mental handicap had designated to them a tranche of capital funding over a multi-annual period. The problem in planning for this service in the past has been that, at the end of each year, they did not know what they would get the following year, which was usually very little.

While I accept the sincerity of Deputy Mitchell's contribution, and her acknowledgment that successive Governments did not deal with this problem, an objective assessment of the amount of money we have put into this area since coming into office compares very favourably with what was put into it beforehand. I do not want to engage in a point scoring exercise, but it is a financial fact.

The £30 million to which I referred was put in place to run over four years in tandem with the service developments identified in the assessment of need. Over the next four years, this capital programme will provide for new residential and day care facilities and the upgrading of existing facilities; the provision of alternative accommodation for persons with a mental handicap currently accommodated in psychiatric hospitals, and the upgrading of existing facilities which will continue to be used in the medium to long-term future; and the provision of facilities for persons with a mental handicap who require specialist services in a secure environment, another provision we have to identify and address.

In addition to the £30 million I announced late last year, I have allocated another £5 million this year because I recognise the need to accelerate the process of providing the facilities required to deliver both the necessary volume and quality of services.

Together with the £4 million capital funding I allocated late last year, this brings to £25 million the total additional funding I have allocated to services for persons with a mental handicap in the past year.

As outlined in both Partnership 2000 for Inclusion, Employment and Competitiveness and An Action Plan for the Millennium, the Government is committed to the ongoing development of services to persons with a mental handicap and the level of funding I have allocated to date underlines that commitment.

I recognise there is a problem to be dealt with and I share Deputy Mitchell's view that these families are doing an extraordinary job in difficult circumstances. It should not be underestimated. A total of 25,000 people have a service, but 2,500 do not and that is being addressed. It is sometimes forgotten that a service exists for many people. There is also the further complication of the growing cost of maintaining the existing level of service. The Deputy made a good point about emergency cases which arise and which must be dealt with. These obviously militate against people obtaining placements as quickly as they would like.

It is a difficult problem but I am committed to solving it. We have made an unprecedented level of funding available for this area compared to funding made available in other years. I acknowledge that more needs to be done and I will try to do more by working with the parents concerned to deal with what is still a difficult situation for many of them.

Top
Share