Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 12 May 1999

Vol. 504 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Child Care Services.

I am glad to have the opportunity to discuss this issue of extreme public importance. Like other Deputies I received many letters on the issue of child care. I have a personal as well as a political interest in this matter. As the father of a one-and-half-year-old with a second child to follow at the end of this week I can testify that the claims made by parents in relation to this matter are not at all exaggerated. There is now widespread frustration and even anger at the lack of a coherent response from the Government on the question of child care.

The situation which was previously unacceptable has now reached crisis proportions because of the implementation of the 1996 child care regulations. This has resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of children permitted in crèches and Montessori schools while fees have increased sometimes by 30 to 40 per cent in order to make up for the shortfall. To put it simply, the supply of child care services is diminishing while demand has increased rapidly. NoMember objects to higher standards, but the short and medium-term consequences of the implementation of the child care regulations should have been foreseen and, perhaps, the crisis could have been averted.

The failure to recognise the impending crisis should not, however, deter the Minister from taking immediate action to prevent an even worse situation. I am suggesting the provision of a once-off capital grant for pre-school service providers to enable them to comply with the regulations. I want the Minister of State to address this directly in his reply and to recognise that this is not a waste of money. Investment in child care is vital if we are to have a properly functioning society.

The above measure will be simply a stop-gap. What is required is the sort of child care policy that is taken for granted in other EU states. In Finland all child care is subsidised and regulated by the state. Some 82 per cent of mothers of children between the ages of seven and 12 work outside the home. In Ireland the figure is 36.6 per cent. Finland gives mothers nearly a year of paid maternity leave plus a further two years' optional parental leave after which they can go back to their jobs at the same level as when they left. We have no comparable policy in Ireland, because when it comes to child care Ireland is still living in the dark ages.

The Green Party has called for the introduction of a national strategy on the provision of child care. This Government, and previous administrations, failed to plan and provide for the child care which is so necessary in our rapidly changing society. The Green Party is recommending that only one Department should be in charge of child care and that it should not only inspect the physical surroundings but also take into account the well-being and development of the children in child care services. This would at least be a means of getting action from the Government in solving this crisis. It would also have avoided the current difficulties, where the planning laws have increased prices and reduced the number of child care places, without other Departments having to take action to counteract the problems caused by these changes.

The current position forces many childminders and parents to operate outside the regulations, and much child care takes place in the black market or with the crucial help of friends and family. This leaves many children sometimes in the care of unqualified and untrained minders in an environment that cannot be inspected. The desperate need for someone to mind one's children leads to desperate measures being taken.

The Green Party is also calling for a network of child care bureaux to be set up locally to oversee the implementation of a national child care policy and to ensure that local child care facilities are properly resourced, represented and co-ordinated. By decentralising the everyday running of child care to the local level, it can be tailored to suit local needs. The management boards of such bureaux would comprise representatives from the local community with emphasis on the participation of parents and child care providers.

In the short-term, the Green Party recommends that the cost of day care should be tax deductible, and child care should be subsidised for those parents who do not qualify for tax deductions. In the medium to long-term the Green Party recommends the phased introduction of a guaranteed basic income for adults. With basic incomes valid work such as parenting and caring, which at present is not given an economic value, would be given equal status with traditional paid work outside the home.

The Green Party recommends tax incentives and supports for businesses which provide a play area or a children's section and for companies and institutions to provide in-house child care so that parents can visit children easily during the day.

There are examples throughout Europe of how child care can and does work to suit both parents and children without costing individual parents a fortune. The calls by industry to increase the number of women in the workforce to fill the skills shortage can go ahead only when women and men feel there is an adequate and safe place for their children to stay while they are working away from home. We have had three reports on this issue and now it is time for action.

The purpose of the Child Care (Pre-School Services) Regulations, 1996, is to build on the existing good standards in our pre-school services and gradually improve standards throughout the sector to secure the health, safety and welfare of pre-school children and to promote the development of children attending pre-school services.

Under the regulations, pre-school providers are obliged to notify their local health board that they are carrying on or proposing to carry on a pre-school service. On receipt of notification the health board will provide relevant information to the applicant and arrange for an inspection to be carried out by an authorised person.

The requirement to reduce places is mainly related to the availability of adequate space per child in the premises and/or the requirement to have a sufficient number of competent adults supervising the pre-school children in the service at all times.

Where deficiencies are identified, the health board and the providers work in a co-operative manner to make specific improvements in a planned way provided that any delay would not adversely affect the welfare of children. The plan may include a reduction in numbers, achieved through natural reduction, that is not replacing children who leave during the year, reducing numbers on a phased basis, reducing numbers at the beginning of the next school year, or by the provider moving to a larger premises. The time scale for making improvements may vary from a requirement for immediate action if the health and safety of the children is at risk, or may extend to six months if it is appropriate to use a phased approach.

The Government is fully committed to expanding the availability of child care. Health boards are providing financial support to pre-school services which cater for children who are regarded as being at risk or disadvantaged. This function is in keeping with the boards' overall responsibilities under the Child Care Act, 1991, in regard to the promotion of the welfare of children.

In recognition of the need to stimulate the supply of child care places, the Minister for Finance, in his Budget Statement of 2 December 1998, announced that capital allowances were being introduced for expenditure incurred on or after 2 December 1998 on the construction, refurbishment and extension of a crèche or nursery. The expenditure can be written off over seven years at 15 per cent per annum for the first six years, and 10 per cent in the seventh year.

The Deputy will be aware that the Partnership 2000 Expert Working Group on Child Care, under the auspices of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, examined the provision of a co-ordinated national framework for the development of a child care infrastructure, including the financing and resourcing implications of its implementation. The report of the group was launched on 3 February 1999. The Government has since established an interdepartmental committee on child care to evaluate, cost and prioritise the proposals in the report and the child care proposals in An Action Programme for the Millennium, the report of the Commission on the Family and the report of the Forum on Early Childhood Education. The committee has been asked to report within a time frame of six months.

Top
Share