Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 23 Jun 1999

Vol. 506 No. 6

Written Answers. - Fisheries Protection.

Jimmy Deenihan

Question:

26 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for the Marine and Natural Resources the status of the Government's case taken in the European Court of Justice against the EU decision to ban drift netting for tuna; if the Government is supporting the tuna fishermen who first took the matter to the court and involved themselves in legal expenses; and his views on whether the case of the tuna fishermen would be stronger if the Government had initiated the action. [15960/99]

As I advised the House on 13 May last, Ireland's intention to intervene in support of the case taken by the French tuna industry against the drift net ban was notified to the European Court before the 7 February 1999 deadline. I understand a favourable ruling by the Court of First Instance on the admissibility of the plaintiff's application has now been made and official notification of the ruling is expected shortly. Detailed work on the preparation of Ireland's submission in the case is under way and my Department will work closely throughout with the Irish tuna fishing industry which also intends to intervene. I can assure the Deputy that a robust intervention by Ireland will be made in support of the case against the ban.

While the strength of the case against the council decision to ban driftnetting stands on its own merits, the fact that the Irish Government and the Irish tuna industry are backing up the French case will lend significant weight to the proceedings. The European Court of Justice is required to consider whether, among other matters, the council decision was valid, justified and consistent with the EU treaties on the basis of all the facts and arguments presented to it. The more parties which intervene the better in my view. Our intervention together with that of our own tuna industry will ensure that the implications for the Irish as well as the French fishing industry are comprehensively aired in court.
Top
Share