Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 2 Nov 1999

Vol. 509 No. 6

Priority Questions. - Pakistani Military Coup.

Proinsias De Rossa

Question:

35 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will make a statement on the military coup in Pakistan; the action, if any, Ireland is taking unilaterally or through the EU or UN to facilitate the return of democratic government to that country, having particular regard to the fact that Pakistan is now a nuclear power; the sanctions, if any, the Government is imposing to promote the return of democratic government; his views on whether it is appropriate in view of the coup that Ireland should appoint a new honorary consul; when a decision will be made on this appointment; and the representations, if any, made to him in this regard [20880/99]

The overthrow of the democratically elected government of Pakistan by the military there is a matter of grave concern to the Government. The Government is particularly dismayed by the proclamation of emergency, the suspension of the constitution and democratic structures, and reports of the arrest of Cabinet Ministers. Together with our EU partners we have called on the military to respect the safety and legal rights of those under arrest and to release them without delay. The situation within Pakistan was already complex and marked by political tensions and economic difficulties. The proclamation of emergency and the suspension of the constitution and democratic structures will further exacerbate these difficulties. These extreme measures were condemned by Ireland and its EU partners at the recent special European Council in Tampere.

Political and economic pressures in Pakistan increased last year as a consequence of the arms race, initiated by India's nuclear tests, which led to the imposition of economic sanctions. Tensions increased further this year as a result of the military clashes in Kashmir, provoked by Pakistan. The absence of civilian control over Pakistan's nuclear weapons, combined with other tension in the region, for example, in Afghanistan, show clearly the dangers of wider regional destabilisation. Continuing dialogue, not confrontation, is needed between Pakistan and India to resolve the tensions in the region. Both Pakistan and India must join and adhere to the global non-proliferation regime.

A major ingredient of the crisis within Pakistan has been the extremely difficult economic situation. Pakistan needs the assistance of the international financial institutions, especially the World Bank and the IMF, as well as supportive agreements with the EU and other major trading partners. However, to receive such assistance, Pakistan needs stable and democratic government capable of sustaining an economic reform programme. In the absence of these conditions, the necessary financial and other support will not be forthcoming. Pakistan was on the verge of signing a trade and co-operation agreement with the EU, but this has now been postponed indefinitely as a result of the military coup. The immediate restoration of democracy and the rule of law is in the best interest of the Pakistani people and will be crucial in preserving the stability of Pakistan and the wider region.

Additional Information.

The question of Pakistan will remain high on the EU agenda. The General Affairs Council will consider the issue at its next meeting on 15 November. The question of further appropriate measures and the future of development assistance will be considered at that time.

The Irish Government's request for approval for the appointment of a new honorary consul of Ireland in Karachi was made to the Government of Pakistan early in October before the military coup. The primary function of an honorary consul is to provide assistance and protection to Irish citizens, especially in situations of uncertainty or distress. While the number of our citizens resident in Pakistan is no more than 150, the services an honorary consul can provide for them are particularly valuable because there is no resident Irish Embassy there. The practical advantages of appointing a new honorary consul must be balanced against other considerations. Accordingly, I do not see such an appointment as being inappropriate at this time.

I am not in a position to say when there will be a response from the Pakistani authorities to our request for approval for the new appointment. As is normal for appointments of this kind, I received representations from interested persons in Pakistan and in Ireland, including from Deputy Ellis, supporting one or other of the 14 possible appointees who were considered.

We will have to re-examine this experiment for Priority Questions. It is inappropriate that the Minister's reply should be cut short. We do not have access to that section of his reply which was not read out and which will go on the record. The process is not working.

If the Deputy has a problem with it, he should consult his representa tive on the Committee on Procedure and Privileges.

The Deputy's two minutes are up.

We need to re-examine the process. The Ceann Comhairle does his job in accordance with the rules and I do not criticise him for that. The Committee on Procedure and Privileges needs to re-examine the process for dealing with Priority Questions. We should abolish the idea and return to the process for dealing with ordinary questions in the case of all questions. The other idea has been tried for long enough.

I agree with the Deputy.

I thank the Minister. Has a new honorary consul been appointed and will the Minister indicate—

On a point of order, a Cheann Comhairle, this is also the subject of Question No. 38.

Yes, it also happens to be mentioned in Question No. 35.

Are the two questions being taken together?

No, this is Priority Questions time. The Deputy should not intervene as we are losing time. It is in order for the Deputy because it is contained in his question, if he reads it.

Has a new honorary consul been appoined and have representations been made relating to the appointment of this person? Is it normal practice for such representations to be made? Can the practice be made public and can those who made representations be made known? It is an area which needs to be open and transparent.

I acknowledge what the Minister said about the situation in Pakistan being extremely complex. Will he indicate his or his Department's assessment of General Musharraf? Is he on the extreme of Pakistani politics or would he be regarded as a moderate? How soon does the Minister think he, or those backing him, are likely to return Pakistan to civilian authority?

Regarding the philosophy of General Musharraf, the Pakistani military ruler, I recommend an excerpt from today's Financial Times to the Deputy for his perusal. As for his political position in the spectrum, on the basis that he has abolished the Government I presume he is extreme right or so far right that he has fallen off the spectrum. The Financial Times contains an interesting reference on the matter. The heading to the article written by an individual in Islamabad states, “Pakistani Military May Seek Popular Approval”. The article states that Pakistan's military ruler may call a referendum in an attempt to secure popular approval for last month's coup, that General Musharraf's remarks were the first indication that the military regime was thinking of seeking electoral support for remaining in power and that Western diplomats said the idea of a referendum was the latest in a series of indications that General Musharraf wished to project a soft image of his regime.

The appointment of an honorary consul had been recommended to the previous Government but it has yet to be made. I do not know what is the status of the appointment in the context of the military coup. Inquiries are ongoing in that regard. For the information of the Deputies – I do not wish to diminish Deputy Mitchell's specific question on the issue – there were 14 candidates for one nomination which was vacated as a result of the resignation of the previous incumbent, a resignation which was effectively called for by the previous Government.

Arising out of that, the then honorary consul took legal proceedings which were subsequently settled on the basis that he would resign which he duly did leaving this vacancy.

Which previous Government?

The last one, I understand.

We have exceeded the time for Question No. 35 and must proceed to Question No. 36.

This system for dealing with questions is grossly unfair and does not make sense.

The Deputy should take up the matter with the appropriate committee.

Top
Share