Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 11 Nov 1999

Vol. 510 No. 5

Written Answers. - Working Time Directive.

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

31 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Health and Children when the terms of the EU directive on working time will be applied to junior hospital doctors working in hospitals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21999/99]

Paul Connaughton

Question:

49 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Health and Children the plans, if any, the Government has to propose any further amendments to the draft working time directive to reduce the hours of work of junior hospital doctors within a five year time frame to a maximum of 48 hours per week. [22809/99]

Derek McDowell

Question:

57 Mr. McDowell asked the Minister for Health and Children his response to the serious concerns of non-consultant hospital doctors in relation to their working hours; the plans, if any, he has to provide a reasonable limit on working hours; if so, the timeframe envisaged; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22854/99]

Alan Shatter

Question:

162 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Health and Children the plans, if any, the Government has to propose any further amendments to the draft working time directive to reduce the hours of work of junior hospital doctors within a five year timeframe to a maximum of 48 hours per week. [23048/99]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 31, 49, 57 and 162 together.

The standard working week for non consultant hospital doctors, NCHDs, is 39 hours. However, as part of an agreement with the Irish Medical Organisation, NCHDs may be rostered for duty for up to an average maximum of 65 hours per week. This includes periods spent on call as well as time actually at work. This agreement was re-negotiated as recently as 1997. The 1997 agreement includes provision for a mechanism designed to deal with situations where NCHDs feel they are being asked to work hours consistently in excess of those laid down in their rosters. Given the nature of the services provided by hospitals it is inevitable that the work periods laid down in rosters will be exceeded from time to time. The mechanism is designed to deal with persistent and serious breaches of agreed hours.

The monitoring and control of doctors' working hours is the responsibility of local hospital managers and the consultant medical staff on whose teams the NCHDs work. The mechanism introduced in the 1997 contract provides a forum for hospital managers, consultants and NCHDs to deal with the problems which arise at local level.

NCHDs as doctors in training were one of a number of groups excluded from the original EU Working Time Directive adopted in 1993. Other excluded groups were transport workers, sea fishermen and offshore oil and gas workers. Following adoption of the 1993 directive the European Commission endeavoured to bring forward proposals to deal with the excluded sectors. The Commission recognised that there would be serious difficulties in bringing these sectors within the precise scope of the 1993 directive. Therefore, the Commission embarked on a series of consultative exercises to address the specific requirements of the excluded sectors.

Ireland has never opposed the idea of offering NCHDs a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the 1993 directive. However in so doing, any provisions covering hospital doctors would have to take account of the need to provide 24 hour medical cover for hospitals and of the need to afford reasonable continuity of care to patients. There would also have to be a reasonable transition period to reach the objective of 48 hours per week without significant disruption to the existing medical career structure. As you may be aware the medical manpower forum was established in 1998 to examine the entire issue of medical staffing in hospitals. One of the current problems is the imbalance between trainee posts – NCHDs – and career posts, i.e. consultants. This in part is a legacy of the creation of 400 extra NCHD posts in 1989-90 to allow for the introduction of the 65 hour week.

In November 1998 the European Commission published its proposals in relation to the excluded groups in the form of a draft directive to amend the 1993 directive. The Commission's proposals went to a Council working group for consider ation. A number of member states had varying degrees of difficulty with the Commission's proposals. Eventually the German Presidency presented a series of compromise proposals to a meeting of Labour and Social Affairs Ministers held on 25 May 1999. These included a 12 year transition period with a progressive reduction in hours to 48 hours at the end of the period. The United Kingdom, which had been holding out for a 15 year transition period, proposed a 13 year period. This was adopted in order to obtain unanimity. The issue is now being considered by the European Parliament.
As part of the process of preparing for the implementation of the directive it has been agreed with the Irish Medical Organisation to conduct a study of NCHD working hours. The study is being overseen by a joint steering group representing the Health Service Employers Agency, the Department of Health and Children and the IMO. A notice was placed on 6 November in the European Journal inviting tenders for the conduct of the study. It is hoped that the fieldwork for the study will be conducted in the early months of next year with the report delivered by May 2000.
I also anticipate that the recommendations of the Forum on Medical Manpower will have a significant impact on the working conditions of hospital doctors. These should lead to a more equitable distribution of the on-call burden as well as enhancing the career prospects for young doctors.
I have to point out that the Department has progressively reduced junior hospital doctors' working hours over the years at considerable cost. The Department is committed to reducing them further in accordance with whatever legislation is adopted by the European Union. The proposals recently adopted by the Council of Ministers should allow for the reduction of junior doctors' hours in an orderly and progressive process which will safeguard patient care and will not jeopardise young doctors' reasonable career expectations.
Top
Share