Ulick Burke
Question:247 Mr. U. Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development the reason a split holding (details supplied) has been accepted for two separate payments under the REP scheme [9127/00]
Vol. 516 No. 6
247 Mr. U. Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development the reason a split holding (details supplied) has been accepted for two separate payments under the REP scheme [9127/00]
The persons named applied for inclusion in the rural environment protection scheme and the applications have been accepted having complied with the terms and conditions of the scheme.
248 Mr. U. Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development the number of REP scheme participants in each district who submitted their 1C form prior to 30 September 1999, 31 October 1999, 30 November 1999, 31 December 1999, 31 January 2000 and 29 February 2000 and have not been paid; the number of compliance inspections that have been taken in each case of non-payment; the number of cases where compliance inspections have yet to be made; his views on whether a serious breach of the Charter of Rights is occurring; and the action, if any, he proposes in this regard. [9128/00]
The following is a nationwide breakdown of REPS cases where a REPS 1C form has been lodged in each of the past six months but payment has not been made. A detailed breakdown by district will be supplied to the Deputy within the next week.
Month |
Application 1C |
Paid |
Paid |
Not Paid |
Not paid |
Lodged |
Inspection completed |
No inspection required |
Selected for Compliance Inspection |
Not selected for Compliance Inspection* |
|
September 1999 |
716 |
346 |
311 |
26 |
33 |
October 1999 |
2,062 |
879 |
966 |
114 |
103 |
November 1999 |
2,941 |
1,206 |
1,358 |
224 |
153 |
December 1999 |
2,921 |
1,016 |
1,351 |
342 |
212 |
January 2000 |
2,527 |
631 |
1,188 |
470 |
238 |
February 2000 |
1,530 |
167 |
594 |
523 |
246 |