Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 7 Mar 2001

Vol. 532 No. 2

Written Answers. - Planning Applications.

Frances Fitzgerald

Question:

166 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government his views on the refusal by An Bord Pleanála of 19% of permissions for child care facilities against local authorities and their own inspectors' views as opposed to only 9% in other types of application; his policy in this area; the way in which an individual can take a judicial review if the minutes of An Bord Pleanála are not available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7183/01]

An Bord Pleanála is a statutory independent body established under section 3 of the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1976. It would therefore be inappropriate for me to comment on decisions taken by the board. However, while I am aware from the board's annual reports that they overturn the recommendation of their inspector in 9% to 10% of cases, I am not aware of the source of the statement in the question that the board has refused 19% of permissions for child care facilities against local authority and their own inspector's view. The board appeared before the Joint Oireachtas Committee on the Environment and Local Government on 22 November 2000, specifically in relation to decisions on child care facilities, and Deputies had an opportunity to raise the issues directly with the board.

Government policy on child care is to increase the number of child care places available and to improve the quality of child care services for the community. I published draft guidelines for planning authorities on child care facilities for public consultation in May 2000. Those guidelines are currently being finalised by my Department following a public consultation process. The final guidelines will be issued as ministerial guidelines under section 28 of the Planning and Development Act, 2000. Section 28 requires that planning authorities and An Bord Pleanála shall have regard to any such ministerial guidelines in the performance of their planning functions.

Under planning law, a judicial review of a decision on a planning appeal by An Bord Pleanála may only be allowed where an application for leave for judicial review is sought within two months of the decision and only where the High Court is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for contending that the decision is invalid or ought to be quashed. In relation to individual planning appeal cases, the whole file, including the decision, the inspector's report on the case and any directions given by the board in relation to the matter, is available for inspection by the public from the third working day following the board's decision. Therefore, documentation is currently made available which would facilitate any application which might be made for a judicial review.

As I indicated in my reply to Question No. 313 of 20 February 2001, the Planning and Development Act, 2000, will require An Bord Pleanála to give the main reasons and considerations on which its decision on an appeal is based. In addition, under section 111(7) of the 2000 Act, An Bord Pleanála is required to keep a written record of all its decisions, including the names of the board members present and the number vot ing for and against a decision. Regulations are currently being prepared by my Department which will enable me to bring the development control provisions of the Act, including these provisions, into force. In all these circumstances, I do not believe there is a need to require the board to keep minutes of its meetings.
Top
Share