Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 28 Mar 2001

Vol. 533 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Telecommunications Services.

The time has come for the Dáil to request the Comptroller and Auditor General, Mr. John Purcell, to investigate all aspects of the privatisation and deregulation of telecommunications infrastructure in Ireland. Following the sale of the second mobile phone licence in 1995, there was and continues to be wide public concern that a vital part of the national infrastructure was sold for a pittance and that the bitter complaints of the losing applicants may have had a serious basis. The privatisation and flotation of Eircom has been controversial, with many citizens on low incomes believing they should have received shares as of right. While the flotation raised a substantial sum to kick start the national pension reserve fund, many citizens are still aggrieved at the subsequent performance of the company and the poor returns on their investment.

Latterly, especially last year, many constituents raised profound concerns about the attitude of the Director of Telecommunications Regulation on the sale of the third generation mobile phone licences. Many of them believed the director lost her best window of opportunity for the third generation mobile phone network by not opting for an auction process. These concerns have been raised widely in the media throughout the past six years, most effectively by Matt Cooper, editor of The Sunday Tribune, Gene Kerrigan of the Sunday Independent and Fintan O'Toole of The Irish Times.

The extent of the ongoing public unease is such that a full investigation by the Comptroller and Auditor General, John Purcell, is warranted. This need not impinge on any matters which might be properly investigated by the Moriarty tribunal. As with the DIRT inquiry first conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General, it may be necessary to confer additional special powers on his office to enable him conduct a full examination of the privatisation of Eircom and telecommunications deregulation. If that is the case, as it appears to be, the Dáil should do precisely that and request Mr. Purcell to report to it in full on all aspects of deregulation and the sale of Eircom. The Dáil should concede to the Comptroller and Auditor General whatever powers of discovery and investigation and other resources are necessary.

The Minister, Deputy O'Rourke, will remember that I raised the issue of the disposal of third generation mobile phone licences with her on 10 May last year when she informed me of the options open to Ireland in this regard, including the auction process, which happened in the United Kingdom and Germany, the so-called beauty contest route and the lottery route. She also referred me to the powers of the Director of Telecommunications Regulation, and the director subsequently sent me her document entitled, The Introduction of Third Generation Mobile Services in Ireland. The document referred to the issue of four new licences and stated that they were being chosen by the beauty contest, not the auction, route.

Like many of my constituents, I was unhappy with this decision and referred it to the Comptroller and Auditor General. He told me by letter last September that, until the level of licence fee to be charged for the successful third generation applicant was decided, subject to the approval of the Department of Finance, it would be premature for him to become involved in any examination of the current position. However, he concluded that he intended to examine the papers dealing with the award of the third generation mobile phone licence and report on the matter to the Dáil if appropriate.

When I wrote to the Comptroller and Auditor General last summer, I also raised the issue of the second mobile phone licence. Mr. Purcell replied:

I examined the sale of the second mobile phone licence to Esat Digifone from the point of view of regularity and propriety and I was satisfied that proper procedures had been applied for the entire award process.

However, following recent press reports, especially the queries raised by The Sunday Tribune relating to the role of the European Commission, the work done by Andersen Management International and previous consultants, the scoring or marking process, the credibility of the business plan of Esat, the beneficial owners of Esat and the alleged political donation by a company in the winning group, I again contacted the Comptroller and Auditor General about the third generation and second mobile phone licences. He reiterated his earlier position but said that, realistically, he would need powers similar to those conferred on him by legislation for the purpose of carrying out the DIRT investigation.

I call on the House to consider urgently bestowing those powers on the Comptroller and Auditor General. In his recent communication he said that, since a committee or tribunal will examine the matter of the second mobile phone licence, he could not see the Oireachtas giving him such special powers for this purpose. However, the time has arrived to ask the Comptroller and Auditor General to deal with this matter because it involves hundreds of millions and perhaps billions of pounds worth of public infrastructure. We must ensure that it was disposed of to the best benefit of our constituents and I ask the Minister, Deputy O'Rourke, to refer the matter to the Comptroller and Auditor General.

I thank the Deputy for raising this issue. The Minister for Public Enterprise has no function in relation to the powers of the Comptroller and Auditor General which are set out in the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993.

The Comptroller and Auditor General's powers, as provided in the Act, include the power to carry out examinations as he considers appropriate for the purpose of ascertaining whether and to what extent the resources of a Department, person or fund have been used and, if acquired or disposed of by a Department, person or fund, have been so acquired or disposed of economically and efficiently and whether any such disposal has been effected upon the most favourable terms reasonably obtainable.

The Comptroller and Auditor General reported on the transfer of the public telecommunications system from State control to the private sector in his 1999 annual report. This report was laid before Dáil Éireann in accordance with the provisions of the Act and it did not outline any concerns in the context of the Comptroller and Auditor General's examination. This matter has also been examined by the Committee of Public Accounts.

I am informed that the Deputy has concerns in relation to the award of the second mobile telephone licence. The Minister gave the following response to Priority Question No. 21 yesterday:

There is the question as to whether the matter raised by the Deputy may be considered by the Moriarty tribunal. The solicitor to the tribunal has informed my Department that the investigative phase of the tribunal's work is conducted on a confidential basis. Because of this and to ensure that it is enabled to perform the tasks assigned to it by the Oireachtas, it would not be appropriate for me to comment in relation to any matter which may be subject to investigations by the tribunal.

There is no change in the Minister's position today. I also remind the Deputy that the second mobile telephone licence was awarded by the previous Administration when his party was in Government.

I am also informed that the Deputy has concerns in relation to the forthcoming third generation mobile telephone licence competition. The Minister has stated that it is a matter for the Telecommunications Regulator to decide on the format of the competition to be held. The current position is that the director has outlined the framework to be used for the third generation mobile licence competition. The Minister is informed that the competition will take place shortly on conclusion of negotiations between the director and the Minister for Finance on the matter of licence fees.

With regard to liberalisation in general, the Office of the Director of Telecommunications Regulation – ODTR – was established in June 1997. The office is responsible for making the liberalised market work in accordance with EU and national law while carrying out its functions of issuing, renewing, enforcing and general administration of licences and managing the frequency spectrum. Full liberalisation took place in Ireland on 1 December 1998 following the Government's decision to end Ireland's derogation from full liberalisation. Prior to that, a number of significant areas had been opened to competition. These included the provision of fax, data and value added services. This area was liberalised in 1992 and over 50 licences were granted prior to full liberalisation. They also included the provision of mobile telephony networks and services. In addition to Eircell Limited, a subsidiary of Telecom Éireann, a second mobile telephony operator, Esat Digifone, was licensed in 1996 to operate a digital GSM mobile telephony service. A competition for the licensing of a combined GSM 900 and GSM 1800 service was conducted in 1998. A third mobile operator, Meteor, has also subsequently commenced operations. They also included the provision of satellite based telecommunications services and the provision of infrastructure for already liberalised services.

Much of the legislation necessary for liberalisation of telecommunications has been introduced through the transposition of EU directives into Irish law. Following a recently completed review of the impact and effectiveness of the earlier directives, five new draft directives are actively under negotiation within the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. It is anticipated that these will be agreed in 2001. In light of these EU reforms and taking into account the Government's regulatory reform programme and the policy document on governance and accountability in the regulatory process, legislation is now being prepared with the objective of enhancing and adapting the telecommunications regulatory framework in order to respond to the rapidly developing market environment.

I have no doubt that the liberalisation of the telecommunications industry has provided for improved consumer choice. Competition is the catalyst for the innovative technically advanced and value driven society that we all recognise as the means to underpin future prosperity.

Top
Share