Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 12 Jun 2001

Vol. 537 No. 5

Written Answers. - Archaeological Sites.

Jim Mitchell

Question:

452 Mr. J. Mitchell asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands if she will make a statement on the number and location of archaeological sites which have been destroyed in the past 25 years; the action which has been taken to ensure prosecution in each case; the number of prosecutions which have been successful; if she will make a further statement regarding an article in a newspaper (details supplied); and the methods employed to ensure that the owners of all heritage sites are aware that it is illegal to tamper with such sites. [16689/01]

There is no available data on the number and location of archaeolog ical sites which have been destroyed in the past 25 years.

Under the National Monuments (Amendment) Act, 1994, the Record of Monuments and Places was established. This places an onus on the owner-occupier of a recorded monument to give two months notice of any intended works at or in relation to the monument. Details of the setting up of the record in each county was notified in both national and relevant local newspapers and copies of the record are available in county council offices and libraries. In addition, under the Planning Acts, the local authorities refer development applications, which are likely to impact on recorded monuments, to my Department for advice and recommendations. Similarly, the Department of the Marine and Natural Resources and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development refer applications for grant aid to my Department where the proposed development might impact on archaeological sites and monuments whilst under the REP scheme, which has over 40,000 participating farmers, protection of monuments on farmland is actively encouraged.

In a further initiative by my Department, a code of practice has been agreed with the National Roads Authority in relation to mitigation of impacts on sites and monuments from road construction and further codes are being discussed with other large scale developers, such as the Irish Concrete Federation, Bord Gáis and the Irish Ports Association.

There have been a number of successful prosecutions in recent years for breaches of the National Monuments Acts, 1930-94. These range from actual damage to sites, interference with sites without the appropriate licence and theft of artefacts. At present there is one case involving damage to a site in the courts system while there are also a number of civil actions being taken for recovery of stolen artefacts.

The Garda is also involved in a number of criminal investigations. In cases where there are reports of damage to monuments, the gardaí are asked to investigate but it is a matter for the Director of Public Prosecutions to decide on whether or not to prosecute.

In the specific case referred to by the Deputy, officials from my Department were informed of the location of the damaged monuments on 24 May 2001 and inspected it on 28 May 2001. Two ring forts have been levelled, field boundaries removed and the ground ploughed and seeded since the site was last inspected. My officials are currently reviewing the inspector's report and will then decide on appropriate follow-up action.

The National Monuments Acts are regarded generally as being quite effective compared with other jurisdictions but I want to further improve the protective provisions and, in this regard, my officials are at an advanced stage of drafting a consolidated and improved act governing national monuments.

Jim Mitchell

Question:

453 Mr. J. Mitchell asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands if her attention has been drawn to the proposal to develop lands at Bishop's Field, Corbally, Limerick; if her attention has further been drawn to the fact that there are allegedly two plague-famine graveyards situated within this site; the Government policy regarding the development of such burial grounds, including whether any archaeological excavations shall be carried out on the site; and if she will make a statement on both the history of this site and her intentions thereon. [16690/01]

Development applications that impact on archaeological sites and monuments are referred by the relevant local authority to my Department for comment and recommendation. No application in relation to the proposed development referred to by the Deputy has been forwarded to my Department. Inquiries with the planning authority indicate that there is no formal application for this site as yet. I am, therefore, not in a position to comment on what archaeological implications, if any, might arise in relation to this proposal.

My Department's publication, Framework and Principles for the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage, sets out broad principles for protecting archaeological sites and monuments. Part III of this publication outlines the principles for the protection of the archaeological heritage. In summary, they state that the archaeological heritage is a non-renewable resource and the first option in all circumstances must be non-destructive investigation and study. Furthermore, there should always be a presumption in favour of avoiding development impacts on the archaeological heritage so that preservation, in situ, is the preferred approach. This applies to all archaeological sites and monuments; no distinction is made between the likes of a burial ground and, for example, a ring fort.

I understand that there is a children's burial ground, which is a recorded monument, in the area and my officials will of course consider carefully any application for development in or near this monument.

Top
Share