Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 13 Dec 2001

Vol. 546 No. 5

Other Questions. - Asylum Seekers.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

7 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the investigation which has been held into the suitability of accommodation provided for a family of asylum seekers at a hotel (details supplied) in County Cork, having regard to evidence given at the inquest on 4 December 2001 into a death of a child who died as a result of being scalded by an overturned kettle and the evidence that the 13 x 9 room in which they were accommodated had no table on which to place an electric kettle; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32079/01]

I offer my condolences to the family on the death of their infant son in such tragic circumstances. The death of an infant child is always a tragedy and it is all the more poignant that it should occur in such tragic circumstances as happened in this case. All accommodation providers and companies managing State owned properties are required under contract, generically approved by the Office of the Attorney General, to ensure that all accommodation centres comply and operate in accordance with all statutory requirements of local authorities and State agencies in relation to bedroom capacity, food, food hygiene, water supply, fire safety and general safety.

In relation to the needs of babies, children and expectant mothers, rigorous contractual requirements are imposed on accommodation providers. In this regard, proprietors and operators of all accommodation centres where asylum seekers with children are accommodated are required to have reasonable regard to the needs of young children. All of the contractual obligations were met by the proprietor in this instance. A cot was provided in the en suite room, the size of which was appropriate to the family and met the provisions of the Housing Act, 1966. In addition, the room contained a television unit, similar to that provided in many hotels. In common with units of this nature, it was designed so that facilities for making tea or coffee could be placed on it. Parents of young children in the centre are discouraged from using kettles or other electrical cooking appliances in their rooms because of safety risks. Although no electrical cooking appliance or kettle was provided by the hotel in the bedroom in question, a dedicated area of the hotel was available 24 hours a day to enable light snacks and food for infants to be prepared. The facilities available included fridges, kettles, sterilizers, microwave ovens, cutlery and crockery.

It is unfortunate that an infant lost his life as a result of this tragic accident. I regret the outcome of the incident, as do staff members in the hotel. It would be wrong to imply that the cause of the dreadful accident could be attributed to inadequacy in the accommodation provided. On receipt of the report of the boy's death, a senior officer from the Reception and Integration Agency travelled to Cork to meet his family and to provide assistance. On arrival, he met the fam ily to offer condolences on behalf of the agency and put in place arrangements with the family, the Southern Health Board and the Garda for the child's funeral in accordance with the requirements of the Muslim faith.

I begin my expressing condolences to the family of the dead child, on my behalf and on behalf of the Labour Party. The loss of an infant child is a dreadful tragedy.

Is the Minister satisfied, notwithstanding the requirements that have to be met by providers of accommodation for asylum seekers as indicated in his reply, that the standards are met in every case? Can the Minister give such an assurance? What actions have been taken since the tragedy to review accommodation currently being provided and to ensure a diminished likelihood of such a tragedy happening again? Is it inappropriate to make available a food warming facility in the room in which infants are staying? Is it unreasonable to suggest that an infant of six or seven months requires food at all times and that asylum seekers, therefore, should have access to appropriate equipment to facilitate this? Is the Minister satisfied that direct provision is the best way to provide for asylum seekers? Does he propose to revisit the issue of direct provision? Can he confirm that the allowance to asylum seekers is the only State benefit not to have been increased in recent times?

Prior to their use, properties proposed for providing accommodation and ancillary services to asylum seekers are inspected by officials from the Reception and Integration Agency to ascertain their suitability. If a property is deemed suitable following such an inspection, a comprehensive memorandum of agreement is entered into by the proprietor and the agency. Such a memorandum is agreed between the agency and a management company in the case of State-owned properties. Under the terms of these agreements, proprietors and management companies are required to ensure that premises comply and operate in accordance with statutory requirements of local authorities and other agencies. Such requirements may relate to planning, building by-laws, bedroom capacity, food, food hygiene, water supply, sewage disposal, fire precautions and general safety.

The inspectorate unit of the RIA conducts regular unannounced inspections of each location where asylum seekers are accommodated. Since the system of dispersal and direct provision was introduced in April 2000, at least two full-day inspections have been carried out on each property. Additional unannounced short inspections are carried out on an ongoing basis. Diminution in standards which come to light as a result of such inspections are treated very seriously by the agency and can lead to termination of contracts, if warranted. The RIA is extremely careful about the accommodation it provides and is keen to ensure standards are kept to the highest level. It is unfortunate that a kettle was kept in the room in the case referred to by the Deputy. A communal area was available for boiling water and it was intended that asylum seekers would use such facilities.

Direct provision has led to the settlement of more than 4,500 people throughout the country. This has been done sensitively, efficiently and successfully. It has been suggested that allowances for asylum seekers should be increased from £15 per week. Those in direct provision with children qualify for child benefit just as citizens of this country do and will therefore benefit from budgetary increases. Direct provision is the best method of housing asylum seekers as there is not a large surplus of accommodation. It would be extremely difficult for asylum seekers to find accommodation if it were not for direct provision. Asylum seekers were sleeping on park benches before the introduction of direct provision and I do not wish to contemplate a return to such a scenario.

Top
Share