Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 27 Feb 2002

Vol. 549 No. 4

Priority Questions. - Broadcasting Regulations.

Brian O'Shea

Question:

12 Mr. O'Shea asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands when she intends to use the powers available to her under the Television Without Frontiers Directive and the Broadcasting (Major Events Television Coverage) Act, 1999, to designate certain sporting and cultural events as being of major importance to society to ensure there is no repeat of the recent situation where the Ireland v. England rugby international at Twickenham was unavailable to the majority of Irish television viewers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [6840/02]

As I said in my response to Question No. 349 of 12 February 2002, the Television Without Frontiers Directive, as amended by EU Council Directive 97/36/EC, provides that member states may designate certain sporting and cultural events as being of major importance to society and take steps to ensure events so designated are available on free-to-air television services.

The EU Council directive places an obligation on member states to provide in national legislation the statutory basis for the designation of events as being of major importance to society and which should be available on free-to-air television services. The directive does not place an obligation on member states to designate any event. Ireland's obligation under the directive was fulfilled through legislation promoted by me, that is, the Broadcasting (Major Events Television Coverage) Act, 1999.

Under that legislation, I have the power to designate a list of events which in the public interest should be available on free-to-air television. In drawing up such a list I am obliged by the Act to consult the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation. In addition, I must consult the organisers of the events and broadcasters who are under the jurisdiction of the State. This, in turn, must be followed by a wider consultation process in respect of any event I intend to designate. It is only then that a draft order designating an event or events can be brought before the Oireachtas for approval. Any list drawn up must be compatible with EU law.

My Department has engaged in consultation with the Department of Tourism, Sport and Recreation on the question of drawing up a list of events to be designated and a consultation process with the major sporting organisations in this country has taken place. It is clear from the consultation process that the drawing up of a list of events is a very complex matter. Some sporting organisations have argued against designation of the major events they organise on the basis that it could impact negatively on their finances and, consequently, on the development of the games, especially at club level. It must be recognised that the television rights to the events are owned by the individual organisations. The possible negative impact of designation on sporting organisations has to be considered and balanced against the public interest of certain events being available on free-to-air television.

Additional InformationThe issues involved are, therefore, complex but are being addressed in an appropriate, consultative and democratic manner. Consultation with the sporting organisations and with the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation is ongoing. When these consultations are concluded, I will be in a position to make a decision regarding a list of events.

Does the Minister agree she has not made any real progress in two years and that it is unacceptable that the legislation balances citizens' rights against the finances of sporting organisations? What guarantee can she give the House of substantial progress being made and the draft order for sporting events coming before the House within the lifetime of the Government? We facilitated the Minister in the enactment of the legislation to which she referred. We recently experienced the first traumatic event as a result of her inaction with the loss of the England-Ireland rugby match. Does the Minister agree the sporting organisations have said "no", that she has backed off and, in so doing, has damaged citizens' rights to free-to-air access to important sporting events?

I do not agree with the Deputy's contention. It is slightly disingenuous to say work has not been done on this given that the Government ensured the Broadcasting (Major Events Television Coverage) Act was enacted in 1999. The Deputy will be aware that, under that Act, there must be proper consultation by me with the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation, the organisers of the events, broadcasters, the wider public and the Oireachtas to ensure any list is compatible with EU law. I inform the Deputy, if he does not already know, that the major sports organisations with which I have had consultations have been against a designated list. In such circumstances one must try to reach proper agreement by way of consultation, which will take time. The Deputy seems to be of the view that one could draw up a list without such consultation. However, consultation must take place under existing legislation. If agreement cannot be reached, a list could still be drawn up, but in such circumstances the process could face a legal challenge from an event organiser or organisers. Accordingly, it is possible no event would be designated.

I also refer to the Ireland v. England game. As Deputies will be aware, the British Government has drawn up a designated A and B list of events. The game to which I referred was included on the B list, but that did not mean it would be available for live coverage on free-to-air television. Being on the B list ensured it would not be available for live coverage on free-to-air television in Britain either.

It is important to remember that this is a very complex issue. Only four member states, Italy, Germany, Britain and Austria have published a list of designated events to date. In November 1998 the Danish Government made an order, which was amended in August 2001, designating certain events. However, in early 2002 it decided to revoke that order with effect from 1 January 2002. There is a small number of countries which have designated events because of the complexity of the matter.

The Minister has consulted and, obviously, there is no agreement. Is she saying legislation introduced here will not be pursued to a satisfactory conclusion because sports organisations in receipt of good grant aid from the State are indicating they will lose money because of it? This is not acceptable?

The different organisations, including the GAA, the FAI and the IRFU believe such a designation would impact negatively on their finances and, consequently, the development of their games, particularly at club level.

Does the Minister believe that?

This issue must be considered and balanced against the public interest. Further consultation must continue.

The Minister must do something about the matter.

I am doing something about it.

Top
Share