Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 7 Mar 2002

Vol. 550 No. 2

Written Answers. - Medical Card System.

Bernard Allen

Question:

300 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason an identification of the exact number of discretionary medical cards in the GMS has yet to take place; the reason general practitioners were paid a notional sum in 2001 based on a figure of 20,000 discretionary cards, while the real figure is believed to be nearer to 80,000; and if he will settle this issue with the general practitioners through the Irish Medical Organisation. [7803/02]

Bernard Allen

Question:

301 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason full payments from previous extensions of the medical card scheme to over 70s dating back to 1999, has not been implemented with the Irish Medical Organisation for general practitioners. [7804/02]

Bernard Allen

Question:

302 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a general practitioner workload review in relation to asylum seekers has not taken place. [7805/02]

Bernard Allen

Question:

303 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason the payment of a ?127 registration fee in respect of asylum seekers, agreed in April 2001 with the Irish Medical Organisation and general practitioners, has not been paid in four health board areas. [7806/02]

Bernard Allen

Question:

304 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason payment of nursing and secretarial grants for part-time staff, in accordance with an agreement reached in July 2001 with the Irish Medical Organisation, has not been implemented. [7807/02]

Bernard Allen

Question:

305 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason his Department has unpaid capitation payments in relation to new over 70s GMS patients backdated to 1 July 2001. [7808/02]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 300 to 305, inclusive, together.

These matters relate to agreements with the Irish Medical Organisation in respect of the Government's decision to extend medical card eligibility to all persons aged 70 and over. The agreements reflected agreed changes in remuneration packages for doctors from March 1999 with the first of a three phased doubling of the income limit for persons in this age category. Subsequent adjustments occurred in March 2000 and March 2001 and on July 1, 2001 when eligibility was extended to all persons in this age group regardless of income.

Of the items involved there is agreement on some that full payment is due to the general practitioners involved but there are technical difficulties in agreeing the basis for the payments.

There is ongoing difficulty at health board level in determining the precise number of discretionary medical cards in the system and in implementing a mechanism to trigger the payments. The ERHA and the health boards have been asked to expedite this matter so that appropriate payments can be made as quickly as possible

A similar problem relates to asylum seekers in some health board areas. While this issue is being clarified an interim payment has been made to doctors of 50% of their claims for these patients. The method of payment for general practitioners in respect of the agreement on the phased doubling of the income limits is the subject of a difference of interpretation. The HSEA has offered to have this matter referred to an independent arbitrator for decision.

A review of the workload of general practitioners in respect of their treatment of asylum seekers did not form part of the agreement but my Department has responded to the IMO sug gesting a methodology to progress this issue and a response is awaited.
The GMS (Payments) Board has informed me grants have been paid to doctors in respect of part-time staff where appropriate supporting documentation has been provided. The board also indicates that retrospective capitation payments have been paid except for a small number of doctors who entered the GMS on a limited contract basis since 1 July 2001.
All of the items at issue are being positively addressed and my Department is committed to the payment of all amounts due as soon as the correct basis for payment has been determined and the issue at dispute is resolved. Officials from my Department will be meeting with the IMO to discuss these issues further.
Question No. 306 withdrawn.
Top
Share