St. Laurence College in Loughlinstown is a secondary school. Loughlinstown is the subject of the CODAN scheme – County Dublin areas of need – the RAPID programme and the Southside Partnership. It is one of the more disadvantaged areas of Dublin and certainly one of the most disadvantaged areas of Dun Laoghaire. The area has been the focus of much social investment over the past few years and all of this is improving the situation there very significantly. St. Laurence College is a school in the Marianist tradition. It has a number of feeder primary schools in the area. The four local primary schools are also based in Loughlinstown and neighbouring Ballybrack. The other secondary school associated with the school completion programme is Cabinteely community school. These six schools, two secondary and four primary, have worked together over the past two years on the stay-in-school retention initiative. This was an important scheme which is bearing fruit in the key social aim of keeping children in disadvantaged areas in school for the longest possible time.
I was a secondary school teacher in Ballyfermot a few years ago and one of the things that was glaringly obvious was the failure of so many students to stay in school in the first place and the almost non-existent graduation to university attendance from such areas. This is also the case in St. Laurence College in Loughlinstown.
In 2001 St. Laurence College was informed that the school completion programme was to be introduced and that it was to be kept in the stay-in-school retention initiative until 2006. It now appears that St. Laurence College is to be left out of the school completion programme and that the only other competition for feeder schools in the area, Cabinteely community school, is to be retained. Cabinteely community school has been a very worthy and successful participant in the scheme up to now, but St. Laurence College should not be left out of it. There are three reasons for this. First, St. Laurence College receives 80% of its current student roll from those four feeder schools that I mentioned earlier. The Minister is aware of the consequences for St. Laurence College if it is no longer involved in a scheme with those four feeder schools. Second, there is a decreasing student roll in the four schools I mentioned which will have consequences for St. Laurence College, independent of its exclusion from the scheme. Finally, the school retention scheme has a budget of €250,000 whereas the stay-in-school retention initiative will be phased out by 2005 and will only involve funding in the region of about €10,000 over the next year or so. There is a clear inequality there, and there are clear reasons why St. Laurence College should be retained within the scheme.
The criteria for leaving out St. Laurence College have not been made clear at this point and they may well be nobly and well motivated. However, it is my impression that whoever made the decision was not fully aware of the facts on the ground and may not have been familiar with the local area. St. Laurence College is the only secondary school in Loughlinstown. The other school is in Cabinteely and also serves places such as Foxrock and Cornelscourt which are fairly wealthy areas. It is probably not appropriate that Cabinteely community school is the only school included in the school retention scheme.
This is an unusual case in that I am not asking the Minister to spend any more money and I am quite aware of the changed climate that exists at the moment. All I am looking for is a political decision to override a decision which I believe was not properly made.