I propose to take Questions Nos. 222 and 223 together.
The fact that Amnesty International and the IPRT were not facilitated recently with a proposed racism project, which was a decision taken entirely on its own merits, has no implication for either organisation in their being afforded access to prisons. I reject any suggestion that the decision in this case amounts to exclusion of either organisation from any future research or other project involving prisoners.
The IPRT has been facilitated in the recent past in conducting research in prisons on the use of segregation cells which involved access to prisoners, prison staff and prison records.
At the suggestion of the Prisons Authority Interim Board, all applications for access to prisoners for research purposes are now being processed by a prisoner based research ethics committee which is chaired by Professor Patricia Casey. The role of the committee is to promote, encourage, support and disseminate ethically based and appropriate research within the prison service. The committee vets all such applications from the point of view of scientific merit and protection of the human rights of prisoners including privacy and personal dignity. There is no restriction placed on the IPRT or Amnesty International forwarding future research proposals to this committee.