Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 Nov 2002

Vol. 558 No. 3

Written Answers. - Natural Heritage Areas.

Ciarán Cuffe

Question:

178 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government the reason no representative of Dúchas has attended the M3 motorway inquiry when the proposed road passes between the Hills of Tara and Skreen. [23909/02]

Ciarán Cuffe

Question:

179 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government the reason no representative of Dúchas has attended the M3 motorway inquiry when the road will have a direct effect on a proposed special area of conservation. [23910/02]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 178 and 179 together.

Meath County Council which is directly responsible for the M3 project, under NRA supervision, consulted extensively with my Department's heritage division at the route selection stage of this project. The environmental impact statement for the proposed M3 motorway was formally provided to my Department on 4 March 2002 and comments were forwarded to An Bord Pleanála on 22 April 2002.

With regard to nature conservation, my Department was satisfied that the route proposed would not have a significant adverse impact on any designated area. The proposed route will cross sections of the Boyne and Blackwater Rivers which are under consideration for designation to protect salmon and its habitat. My Department, recommended therefore that the construction work should be carried out in consultation with the Eastern Regional Fisheries Board, and also recommended mitigation measures to minimise any environmental impacts on habitats and species.

With regard to archaeology, my Department was satisfied that the route chosen was the most appropriate, in the context of the known rich archaeological heritage of this part of the country. My Department enclosed the archaeological mitigation measures proposed in the EIS, as well as recommending a number of additional measures, to include pre-development archaeological testing and assessment at various points along the proposed route.

Departmental staff attend inquiries of this nature if it is considered necessary to clarify advice on the protection of the built and natural heritage. In this case, while there had been full consultation with the Department about the project and our advice was already available to the inquiry and did not require further clarification, an archaeologist from the organisation did attend the inquiry on two dates, 21 August and 11 September.
Top
Share