Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 11 Feb 2003

Vol. 561 No. 1

Written Answers. - Public Transport.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

443 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the circumstances whereby he instructed Bus Éireann to discontinue the 6 a.m. Cavan to Dublin service and gave approval to a private operator to run a service on this route; the rationale for so doing; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the new service does not meet the needs of passengers due to a changed timetable; the action he will take to address this issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3196/03]

My Department received a complaint in August 2000 from a private bus operator that Bus Éireann was competing, contrary to section 25 of the Road Transport Act 1958, with new licensed services that the operator had introduced in July 2000. Bus Éireann is exempt from licensing under the Road Transport Act 1932. However, the company is bound under section 25(1) of the Transport Act 1958 to seek the consent of the Minister if it wishes to initiate or alter services so as to compete with a licensed service. Following consideration of the complaint, I concluded that Bus Éireann had initiated passenger road services from Cavan to Dublin from Monday to Friday at 6 a.m. and 7 a.m. and a service from Cavan to Dublin on Sunday at 7 p.m. which competed with a licensed passenger road service under licence No. 00021 for services on the Cavan to Dublin route departing Cavan at 6.30 a.m. Monday to Friday in respect of the stop at Cavan only; and with a licensed passenger road service under licence No. 00022 for services on the Killeshandra to Dublin route departing Cavan at 7 p.m. on Sunday in respect of the stops at Cavan and Virginia only. I also concluded that Bus Éireann did not seek or obtain ministerial consent to operate the services complained of and that it was therefore in breach of section 25 of the 1958 Act.

Preliminary notice of the findings of the investigation was forwarded to the company in May 2001. Following receipt and consideration of further documentation from the parties concerned and advice from the Attorney General's office, my Department wrote to Bus Éireann in January 2002 advising it that it appeared to be in breach of section 25 of the 1958 Act and that consideration was being given to issuing a direction to Bus Éireann under section 25(3) of the Transport Act 1958 requiring it to cease its above mentioned services, and inviting the company's observations. Following further consideration of the matter, Bus Éireann was advised in November 2002 of my decision that the company had been found to be in breach of section 25(1) of the Transport Act 1958 and was directed to cease the provision of services at the stops and times in question by 31 December 2002. The company's attention was also drawn to the option of seeking ministerial consent to initiate services in competition with those of a licensed operator.

It was assumed that giving the company over six weeks in which to withdraw services would provide sufficient notice to enable Bus Éireann to advise members of the public and indeed to make an application for consent to operate the services if it so wished. It would appear that the company did not provide adequate notice to passengers and details have been requested from Bus Éireann of the notice provided to passengers and local staff. In early January, the company formally requested consent under section 25 of the 1958 Act to operate services from the stops in question. My Department has considered the application for consent from Bus Éireann and legal advice from the Attorney General's office and is finalising its recommendations to me in relation to this matter. In accordance with legal advice from the Attorney General's office, both Bus Éireann and the licensed private operator will be asked to provide observations on my Department's recommendations. Any observations received will be considered in reaching a final decision on the request for consent.
Top
Share