Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 5 Mar 2003

Vol. 562 No. 5

Written Answers - Data Retention.

Richard Bruton

Question:

290 Mr. R. Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the main elements of the legal changes in relation to data retention which his Department has under consideration; the consultation with the data service providers, citizen groups and independent experts which has been undertaken; if his attention has been drawn to a very sceptical appraisal of a similar proposal by a British parliamentary committee; and if he will consider referring the issue to a Dáil committee to conduct hearings on the matter. [6602/03]

To begin with, I feel it is necessary to point out that access to retained data for the purpose of the investigation of serious crime and in the interest of the security of the State is already allowed in law. Section 98 of the Postal and Telecommunications Services Act 1983 as amended by the Interception of Postal Packets and Telecommunications Messages (Regulation) Act 1993 allows for the disclosure of information concerning the use made of telecommunications services in a number of circumstances on a request from a member of the Garda Síochána not below the rank of chief superintendent and a member of the Defence Forces not below the rank of colonel. Fundamentally, what is now proposed is that, following on from EU directives concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, a time limit be set on the period for which certain data on telecommunications usage must be retained for possible access, under specific circumstances and subject to specific safeguards, by the Garda Síochána for the investigation of serious crime and by the Garda Síochána and the Defence Forces in the interest of the security of the State. The time limit being considered is three years, which is shorter than the period which licensed operators historically retained such information for billing purposes.

On 24 February 2003, I hosted an information forum attended by a wide range of interested parties including industry representatives, civil rights groups and members of the legal profession. At that forum, I stated that I have an open mind in relation to all aspects of the proposed legislation. I am aware of the report of the all-party parlia mentary Internet group to which the Deputy refers. I must point out that this group is fundamentally different in nature to a Dáil committee as it is a self-appointed group of Members of Parliament with an interest in Internet issues. That being said, all views from whatever source in relation to this issue are being considered including the report of that group. I do not propose to refer the issue to a Dáil committee at this stage. However, as the Deputy is aware, the legislation will be subject to the normal rigours of passage through the Oireachtas, including Committee Stage scrutiny.
Top
Share