Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 25 Mar 2003

Vol. 563 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Industrial Relations.

I am grateful for the opportunity to raise this important issue on the Adjournment. A stand-off has been going on for three weeks at the ADM plant in Ringaskiddy and concern has been expressed to me by families of the workers involved. The stress of being out of work after working non-stop for 20 years without a strike is terrible. It creates an air of uncertainty and a strong sense of unease.

Some workers feel they have been locked out while others, who have agreed to new work arrangements, feel it is unjustifiable that they have been temporarily laid off. This plant, which produces citric acid, was purchased from Pfizer's. The workers retained the conditions that applied in that company and all agreements were honoured by the new owners. The workers, as a result, gave loyal service so it is understandable that ADM now has an ageing workforce.

There have been ongoing problems with branch two workers of SIPTU for a number of years. The company, in trying to introduce alternative rosters, is conscious of setting guidelines for a generation of new workers but the "take it or leave it" attitude exemplified was contrary to all human resource procedures adopted by the company to date. The operators who have been locked out are anxious to negotiate – they are willing to discuss new working arrangements, they do not want to be inflexible. They are grateful for the employment they have been given by the company and they are anxious to be involved in normal trade union negotiations.

Unfortunately rumour abounds and there is an undercurrent suggesting that there is over-production of citric acid in the world and that it suits the company to close temporarily to save money while placing workers' families in financial straits.

I represent most of those workers and my interest is to save their jobs. I exhort all those involved to get back to work and restore harmony in a company that is held in the highest esteem in County Cork. The Minister of State and the Tánaiste have the power and capacity to ensure progress is made to reach acceptable, fair and just solutions to this problem. Given the uncertainty abroad and the fears expressed by the workers and their families, we as a Government must be seen to be actively involved in ensuring people get back to the table.

Progress is never made in a stand-off. The Tánaiste and the Minister of State are well aware that unless the parties are brought to the table, 170 jobs could be lost. They must actively seek ways and means where both parties to the dispute can come together for meaningful negotiations to ensure progress is made and people can go back to work in a company that has provided reliable, pensionable employment. That company will then retain the high status it has enjoyed since the plant was purchased in 1990.

The Tánaiste and I are extremely concerned about this dispute, which has resulted in the temporary closure of the company since 10 March 2003. It is particularly undesirable that all 170 jobs at the plant could be at risk as a result of a dispute. The loss of those jobs would be a major blow to the local economy.

The company sought agreement to introduce a restructuring plan which involved new rostering arrangements. The new arrangements were due to come into effect in early March 2003. The conciliation service of the Labour Relations Commission received an urgent request to intervene between management and staff representatives due to difficulties in introducing the new arrangements. Accordingly, on 5 March 2003 an officer of the commission met representatives of staff and management. The outcome of these discussions was rejected by SIPTU. The company then announced its intention to close the plant for a temporary period to facilitate a review of plant operations. Operations at the Ringaskiddy plant ceased on 10 March.

SIPTU immediately requested the Labour Relations Commission to refer the dispute to a full hearing of the Labour Court. However, in response, the company indicated that it was not in a position to agree to this request at this time. The continuation of the dispute is particularly disappointing in light of the failure of management and unions to achieve a solution to the impasse, despite the intervention of the Labour Relations Commission.

The Tánaiste has stated in this House on previous occasions that it would not be appropriate to intervene in such industrial disputes. Instead, both parties involved in this dispute should utilise the expert services of the dispute settling machinery to avoid continuing disruption and hardship. The experience and expertise of these services are available free of charge to disputing parties and offer them the best avenue for resolving their differences.

It is ultimately the responsibility of the parties concerned to ensure that agreement is reached. Settlement of industrial disputes requires the goodwill of both sides and often requires compromise by both parties. I take this opportunity to encourage both sides to demonstrate their goodwill and desire to resolve the impasse by renewing dialogue.

Top
Share