Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 26 Mar 2003

Vol. 563 No. 5

Inter-country Adoptions.

I am raising this matter on behalf of constituents who want to adopt a child from abroad. They received information and an application form from the South-Western Area Health Board and were advised that the waiting time for processing the application would be between 16 and 18 months. This is the initial stage of the adoption process. The next stage that leads up to and includes adopting a child will take another 18 months. Like many others, the couple accepted this timetable without question.

There is now a problem, however, with the waiting time for the processing of the initial application form. This is related to the Eastern Regional Health Authority and, in the case of my constituents, specifically to the South-Western Area Health Board.

I looked at the website of the International Adoption Association of Ireland and was shocked by the information based on the most recent data available to the association. According to Department of Health and Children figures for December 2001, the national waiting list for overseas adoptions stood at 1,070 applications. Of these, 51% live in the ERHA area, while of the 38 full-time and one part-time social worker doing adoption assessments State-wide, fewer than one quarter are in the ERHA area. This discrepancy means that each ERHA social worker deals with 57 applications while social workers in health boards outside the Eastern Regional Health Authority deal with only 18.

This discrimination against ERHA applicants makes the service terrible in Dublin when compared to other areas. Based on current productivity levels, the ERHA health authority applicants on the waiting list can expect a four year wait before starting assessment and, at best, they will then have to wait a further year before receiving their declaration of suitability.

Furthermore, social workers seem to do far too few assessments. In 2001, they each carried out 15 complete assessments, considerably below the national target of 18 to 20 and a reduction from the 20 to 24 target set in June 1999 by the Department of Health and Children's standardised framework on inter-country adoption. According to the Department's own figures, between December 1998 and September 2001, the ERHA inter-country assessment service team grew from eight full-time and one part-time social workers to nine full-time and one part-time social workers, an increase of one social worker in the health board area with over 50% of national applications. In the same period, the number of non-ERHA social workers doing inter-country adoption assessments rose from nine full-time to 28 and one part-time, an increase of 19 full-time and one part-time social workers in health board areas with less than half of the applications. Since 2000 the number of ERHA social workers allocated to inter-country adoption assessments has fallen from 12 full-time in June 2000 to nine full-time and one part-time in June 2001 and remains at that level as of December 2001.

There are also continuing doubts about the accuracy of the ERHA figures. Since September 2001 the ERHA alone of all health boards has refused to provide an official estimate of the waiting times. The South-Western Area Health Board states that it cannot accurately project waiting times due to the constantly varying numbers on the waiting lists and the fluctuations in the number of social workers available for assessments.

The Minister of State recently addressed a conference on inter-country adoption organised for the International Adoption Association. He said that the issue of changing circumstances in the 21st century and their impact on adoption legislation was being actively considered and that he hoped to be in a position to produce a set of proposals in the near future and consult widely on them. I welcome such proposals but the system must be in place to deal with overseas adoptions, particularly in the largest population area.

Are the statistics I read out accurate? Has there been any meaningful improvement? Does the Minister of State have statistics to back that up? There is a mismatch between the demand for the service and the allocation of social workers that has led to a massive waiting time problem in the Eastern Regional Health Authority area.

Will the Minister give a commitment, given the discrepancy that penalises people living in Dublin, to redistribute the processing workload of the South-Western Area Health Board to other health boards? I ask for this one small commitment on behalf of the hundreds of families in the Dublin area who want to give nothing but love and a chance of a better life to children from overseas.

I thank Deputy Gogarty for raising this issue on the Adjournment. He referred to the recent announcement I made about a consultation process on new adoption legislation. That process is taking place in a tight timeframe. The heads of a Bill to implement the Hague Convention on Inter-country Adoptions must be submitted for consultation because unless we do that our credibility and sincerity in seeking children for adoption will be open to challenge. Legislation is crucial because it is not just a matter of providing a service to assess prospective adopters in Ireland, it is also essential to ensure that adoptions that take place from other jurisdictions are in the best interests of the child, a controversial subject.

Our legislation provides for inter-country adoption and for assessment based on a standardised framework that is also an important guarantee of the integrity of our overseas adoption arrangements. We are the only jurisdiction in the world that provides its citizens with the statutory right to an assessment of suitability for adoption. The existence of that assessment is of considerable assistance to our authorities when seeking to conclude adoption arrangements with other jurisdictions.

Since my appointment, I have been acutely aware of the delays being experienced by prospective inter-country adopters for assessment in the eastern region. The delays have occurred because of an increased interest in inter-country adoption and difficulties in recruiting social workers. I have had meetings with my officials and the interests involved to discuss this issue in detail. Efforts are continuing to deal with the current shortage of social workers by recruiting internationally and by increasing the number of training places nationally.

Additional funding of €2.1 million has been provided nationally over the past four years to reduce the time spent by couples on waiting lists. Almost €830,000 of the additional funding provided has been provided to the ERHA.

The standardised framework for inter-country adoption assessment procedures is now being used in all health boards. The purpose is to streamline assessment processes so that resources are used effectively. The framework has been welcomed by both health boards and prospective adopters and provides clarity on the training that must be undertaken.

Major improvements are now being seen in the ERHA service. The waiting time for assessment has decreased to 17 months, a substantial improvement on the previous position. Staffing difficulties are being overcome – the number of social workers in the ERHA service almost doubled between the end of 2001 and the end of 2002. Staffing difficulties are being overcome. The number of social workers in the ERHA service almost doubled between the end of 2001 and the end of 2002. There are currently about 18 (whole-time equivalent) social workers in the service, including supervisors. The ERHA has advised that the retention rate of social workers has also improved. The number of assessments completed increased from 137 in 2001 to 157 in 2002. The ERHA expects that the output will increase significantly during the first half of 2003 as the social workers recruited during 2002 become more experienced. An appropriate administrative structure is now in place to manage the service, freeing up social workers to concentrate on assessments and to provide a more focused service for those who require it.

I am satisfied that progress is being made in the ERHA inter-country adoption service. The waiting time in the eastern region is now similar to the waiting time being experienced in some of the other boards. However, I am continuing to monitor the situation to ensure that prospective adopters do not experience long delays in waiting for assessment. I am not satisfied that the waiting period should even be as long as 17 months. I have been assured by the ERHA that it continues to work in conjunction with the area health boards to continue to improve delivery of this service. I am open to constructive suggestions as to how the service can be improved. As I pointed out to the Deputy, this is one of the few, if any, jurisdictions in the world providing such a service free of charge. However, I do not wish to give the impression that I am proposing to introduce a charge for this service, which must be available free of charge to those who seek it. I am examining other options with a view to improving the service.

Top
Share