Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 7 Oct 2003

Vol. 571 No. 4

Waste Management.

In July this year, it was reported that 2.5 tonnes of radioactive material, the remnants of a particle accelerator, continue to be stored on the grounds of University College, Cork. This machine was given to the college by the government of the United States of America in the mid-1970s as a gift of the sort that keeps on giving. Particle accelerators were also given to other countries such as India and Pakistan which subsequently went on to develop full nuclear programmes. After a few years, the machine stopped being used and by the early 1980s it was dismantled. It has remained on the grounds of the university. As 2.5 tonnes of radioactive material, it poses significant health and safety risks for those who work and study at the college. In addition, Irish Steel and Irish ISPAT were responsible for receiving a large quantity of radioactive metals which were largely sourced through Haulbowline and much of which remain on the island long after the closures of both companies. In recent weeks a fire at the Sunbeam factory came close to destroying a facility which deals with small quantities of less dangerous radioactive materials.

These instances demonstrate the lack of a Government policy in relation to radioactive materials. The only statement we have from the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government indicates his opinion that while the problem will be sorted out, it does not need to be sorted out now. This Minister is quite emphatic in his comments most of the time and I can only contrast his statement on radioactive waste with statements he has made about toxic waste. He is quite insistent that we need a toxic waste incinerator, one of which is proposed for my own constituency. We do not produce enough toxic waste to make such an incinerator economically viable which means we will have to produce more toxic waste or import it to justify its construction. On the other hand, we have a very real problem with radioactive waste to which the Government and, in particular, the Minister are giving no consideration.

The problem does not relate only to the three locations of which I have made mention. Radioactive waste in its largest component is the residue of the radiological departments of our hospitals. Much of it must be stored in lead canisters deep underground. The Government should commit to a central facility deep underground with the necessary lining to prevent the type of incident which almost happened at Sunbeam last week. Radioactive materials can become part of a conflagration, expose people to the kinds of health and safety risks we have seen at University College, Cork, for the last 20 years or be left behind by a company which ceases operations with the price being paid by those who live in the area.

While I am grateful that a member of the Cabinet is taking the Adjournment, I would like to hear from the Minister a statement of personal concern in spite of her reluctance to speak on behalf of her colleague or initiate any Government policy in this area. I would like Deputy Coughlan to bring this issue to the Cabinet and to indicate that the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government can be shaken out of his complacency.

Absolutely.

The real problem in this country is not toxic waste, which is too small scale to justify an incinerator economically. The problem is radioactive waste. Until we see some seriousness on that subject, the general lack of seriousness with which many of us on this side of the House tend to treat the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government cannot begin to improve. He must behave the way we expect of a member of the Cabinet to act.

Ba mhaith liom ar dtús báire mo bhuíochas a ghabháil don Teachta as ócáid a thabhairt dom a chur in iúl cad é tá idir láimhe ag mo chomhghleacaí, an tAire Comhshaoil, Oidhreachta agus Rialtais Áitiúil.

I welcome the opportunity to make a statement on the need for a national repository for radioactive waste. We have been addressing this issue for some time and it is of particular relevance in the context of current negotiations on a proposed European Council directive on the control of high activity sealed radioactive sources and the presentation by the European Commission of a new legislative package on nuclear safety.

Ireland's radioactive waste is generally low level and low volume and derives, as the Deputy has said, in the main from hospital and certain industrial applications. As a standard policy and in accordance with the polluter pays principle, those who generate such waste should ensure its safe disposal and must guarantee a high level of public and worker safety and environmental protection. The storage, removal or disposal of radioactive waste is subject to strict licensing by the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland or RPII. While the RPII's annual reports provide details of its licensing and enforcement functions, the institute has for some time advocated the establishment of a national repository for radioactive waste. This would be consistent with best international practice and our obligations under the International Atomic Energy Agency Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. While this is the preferred option to storage on the premises of some 60 RPII licensees, it does not reflect a view that radioactive waste is being stored unsafely. The institute has not identified any capacity problem in hospitals or industrial premises as regards storage.

Ireland's radioactive waste falls into the two categories of unsealed sources which are usually in liquid form and sealed sources which are enclosed in containers. Unsealed sources have a very short radioactive half-life. This type of waste from hospitals is normally discharged through public drainage systems and does not result in any residual contamination. Other unsealed radioactive solid waste is retained in designated radioactive storage under RPII licence conditions. Sealed radioactive sources are used in hospitals for radiotherapy and for various purposes in industry and education. Sealed sources are normally sent back to the manufacturer as part of the contract governing their purchase and importation in the first place, while waste that cannot be returned is currently stored in hospitals and on industrial premises under licence from the RPII. The RPII inspects such premises regularly.

A full specification for a storage facility, having regard to the range of appropriate considerations involved, is under development in consultations between the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the RPII. No decisions have been taken in this regard and any proposal will, of course, be subject to extensive evaluation and normal planning procedures. My colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Cullen, is satisfied that we must move forward in the interests of optimum safety at national level while adhering fully to existing and emerging international obligations.

Top
Share