Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 2 Dec 2003

Vol. 576 No. 1

Written Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

Jerry Cowley

Question:

335 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason behind introducing the new arbitrary six month eligibility criteria for those households now seeking rent supplements; the specific safeguards she will introduce in the new regulations to protect the elderly, homeless, disabled and particularly those offered accommodation by voluntary housing bodies, and who are the most vulnerable in society; if she will raise the whole issue of rent subsidies with the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to clarify responsibility; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [29271/03]

Under the terms of the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which is administered on behalf of my Department by the health boards, payment of a weekly or monthly supplement may be made in respect of rent to eligible people in the State whose means are insufficient to meet their needs after they pay their rent. The purpose of the supplementary welfare scheme is to deal with emergencies and short-term needs that arise when a person has a change in circumstances, for example when a tenant becomes unemployed and can no longer afford their rent.

Rent supplements were never intended to meet a person's long-term housing needs. Despite this the scheme has, over the years, become in effect a form of housing support. It does not make sense to have two parallel but entirely separate programmes one operated by the housing authorities and the other by the health boards. The rent supplement scheme does not give a good long-term outcome to individuals. They have limited security of tenure, accommodation standards can sometimes be poor and they must remain on social welfare in order to retain their accommodation. The scheme does not give a good outcome to the State either as it provides poor long-term value for money and in effect it by-passes the priorities set by the local authorities in their housing programmes.

This is why I have taken a number of initiatives in this area, including the provision that a person must have been renting for six months. Rent supplement will be payable only where the person has been in rented accommodation for a period of six months at the time of application. Provision will be made for cases where a housing authority designates that a person is homeless, or a person has been identified by a housing authority as having a housing need which cannot be met by the housing authority, a voluntary housing organisation or by the person concerned. This will help re-focus the rent supplement scheme on its original objective of short-term income maintenance.

In the course of implementing these measures, particular care will be taken to ensure that the interests of vulnerable groups, such as the homeless, the elderly and people with disabilities are fully protected. The measures will be implemented in the context of a greater role for housing authorities in meeting the long-term housing needs of people who currently rely on rent supplement, particularly the vulnerable groups mentioned.

There are ongoing discussions between my Department and the Departments of Environment, Heritage and Local Government and Finance, on the future of rent assistance and in particular the role of local authorities in that regard. These discussions follow on the recommendations made in the report of the inter-departmental committee on the administration of rent assistance which reported in 1999. In addition, a number of projects are under way, involving close co-operation between the relevant housing authority, the health board and my Department at local level, with a view to achieving improved co-ordination of existing arrangements for housing support and a better outcome for rent supplement recipients.

Michael Ring

Question:

336 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding the case of a person (details supplied) in County Mayo; and the measures her Department can take for a person such as this. [28903/03]

The person concerned was in receipt of unemployment assistance until 20 September 2003 when his payment was uspended following his failure to provide information regarding his means. It has since come to light that in addition to his continued engagement in self-employment, the person concerned has also been engaged in employment on a part-time basis as a home help. He did not inform my Department of this. My Department has established that the person concerned has current earnings in excess of €100 per week in respect of his part-time employment as a home help. These matters have been investigated and are now being considered by a deciding officer who will shortly make a decision with regard to his entitlement.

Questions Nos. 337 to 345, inclusive, answered with Question No. 69.

Top
Share