Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 23 Mar 2005

Vol. 599 No. 6

Adjournment Debate.

Hospital Services.

I would like to give one minute of my time to Deputy Lynch.

I pay tribute to the leukemia unit of the Mercy Hospital in Cork for the great work done for sick children in Cork city, county and surrounding counties. I also pay tribute to the Mercy order, which set up the unit, as well as to those people who helped to fund the unit through the years. I ask the Minister for Health and Children to make a statement on the decision of the Irish Medicines Board instructing the hospital to suspend all clinical trial related activities for the treatment of child leukemia with effect from 15 March, because consultants at Our Lady's Hospital in Crumlin were unwilling to sign a document outlining the Mercy Hospital's responsibilities under a shared care programme forwarded by the Mercy Hospital to Our Lady's Hospital. This will have serious implications for the treatment of sick children in the greater Cork area, who will be forced to travel to Dublin several times a week in some cases.

I also ask for a statement on the failure of the Department of Health and Children to sanction a replacement consultant haematologist for the children's leukemia unit. There are difficulties arising as a result of the retirement of a consultant next May, but whose retirement has been well known for 12 months by the Southern Health Board and the Department of Health and Children. As a consequence of the imminent retirement of the consultant, the children's leukemia unit in the Mercy Hospital can no longer take on new cases of childhood cancers and leukemia. All such cases in the Cork region are being treated in Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children and only existing patients are being treated in the children's leukemia unit in the Mercy Hospital.

The cancer treatment of children is protracted and the children and at least one family member are being forced to travel long distances for essential treatment, sometimes on public transport. This has a traumatic effect on children, on their immediate families and often on their extended families, who may provide necessary support and assistance to family members left at home. Therefore, the appointment of the new post of consultant haematologist with an interest in child haematology should be made as quickly as possible to allow the children's leukaemia unit again to take on new cases of child cancers, including leukaemia, in the region.

I am aware that earlier this year the Tánaiste was contacted about this matter but the affected parents have not yet received a response. The families I have met are extremely distressed and concerned about what is happening. Some of them make long journeys to Dublin with sick children who must often fast before treatment. They must also make the long return journey to Cork after receiving treatment. The parents and their children are distressed and upset by the uncertainty of the situation and the extensive travel involved. It is essential for these issues to be resolved as quickly as possible. It will be a scandal if bureaucratic barriers affecting the operation of the unit cannot be set aside quickly and effectively.

I thank Deputy Allen for allowing me to share his time slot. I am also grateful to the Ceann Comhairle's office for allowing this issue to be raised on the Adjournment. When one considers the statistics, it is clear that Ireland is one of the wealthiest nations in Europe. However, if we cannot provide the type of treatment necessary for children who are critically ill, that wealth is worth nothing to us. Over the years, the leukaemia unit in the Mercy Hospital has done trojan work. As a testament to that work, the hospital has a committee which includes the parents of children who have been treated and cured in that unit. They still work on behalf of the unit and now work on behalf of the 50 families of children who are treated there.

Can the Minister of State imagine their shock when they were informed that the person who oversees the treatment of their children was retiring? His retirement has been known about for almost a year. As a result of changes in the health services system, the Health Service Executive is now demanding that the application process for that post should recommence. In the meantime, no new cases of child leukaemia diagnosed in Cork and the surrounding areas will be treated by the leukaemia unit in the Mercy Hospital. Therefore, new patients will have to travel to Our Lady's Hospital in Crumlin. Very sick children may have to travel to Dublin weekly all because the Government refuses to put in place the necessary personnel to ensure that the unit can continue to render the sterling service it has provided for many years.

I would like to be associated with the tributes paid by Deputy Allen to the service providers. I know the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Harney, would also like to be associated with those tributes. I thank Deputy Allen and Deputy Lynch for raising this matter on the Adjournment which I am answering on behalf of the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children.

I have good news to convey and wish to correct the record as regards some of the information that has been provided in this regard. The Irish Medicines Board is the statutory body responsible for the regulation of human medicinal products in Ireland. This includes the regulation of clinical trials. The Tánaiste understands that activities related to the conduct of clinical trials were suspended in the Mercy Hospital, Cork, on 15 March 2005 due to issues requiring clarification under the terms of a shared care agreement between Our Lady's Hospital, Crumlin, and the Mercy Hospital.

The purpose of the shared care agreement is to ensure that clinical trial related activities are carried out to the same high standards at all locations. I am pleased to inform the House the Tánaiste has been advised that these issues have now been resolved and that all the parties involved have signed up to the shared care agreement. The Irish Medicines Board today lifted the suspension and the Mercy Hospital has been notified of this. The unit was not closed down and there were no implications for children who are undergoing clinical trials for leukaemia treatment at the unit.

Nobody ever said the unit was being closed down.

Please allow the Minister of State to continue without interruption.

As regards the appointment of a consultant paediatrician, the Department of Health and Children is not responsible for the advertising of individual consultant posts. It is, therefore, incorrect to state that the Department failed to advertise for a replacement consultant paediatrician for the Mercy University Hospital. The Health Act 2004 provided for the Health Service Executive which was established on 1 January 2005. Under the Act, the executive has the responsibility to manage and deliver, or arrange to be delivered on its behalf, health and personal social services. This includes responsibility for the provision of acute hospital services and the appointment of new or replacement consultant posts. As such, the Department of Health and Children no longer has a role in the funding arrangements for individual consultant posts.

That is only since January.

As regards cancer services in the southern region, a professor of paediatrics is employed for three sessions at the Mercy University Hospital to provide paediatric care for children attending the hospital. The professor is due to retire at the end of May 2005. As to the continuation of these services, the hospital is to submit a proposal for a locum consultant to the Health Service Executive, as a matter of priority. This proposal is for an appointment for a 12-month period with a sessional commitment of 5.5 sessions to the Mercy University Hospital.

Considerable investment has been made in recent years in the development of cancer services in the southern region. Since 1997, the HSE's southern area has received an investment of approximately €80 million for oncology services, including this year's allocation of an additional €3.5 million from national cancer strategy funding to address increased regional pressures in oncology services. This funding has provided for the approval of an additional 11 consultants in key areas of cancer care delivery.

The funding has also provided for the appointment of 27 cancer care nurse specialists throughout the region. Additional Revenue funding of €1.55 million is being allocated from national cancer strategy funding in 2005 to address increased regional pressures. A number of southern region hospitals are benefiting to the value of approximately €1 million for colorectal and plastic surgery, while the Mercy University Hospital will benefit to the extent of €300,000 for oncology service pressures. The South Infirmary-Victoria Hospital will receive an additional €250,000 for cancer related services.

Capital funding of more than €4 million has been provided for the development of radiation oncology services at Cork University Hospital and ongoing revenue funding of €3 million is being provided to cater for the expansion of these services. I hope that reply has been informative and helpful for the Deputies who raised the question.

I thank the Minister of State for his reply.

Airport Development Projects.

I am grateful for the opportunity to raise this important matter on the Adjournment and thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to do so. Knock is Ireland's fourth international airport serving up to 13 counties. Some 21 million passengers a year travel through airports in the south and east. Six million passengers travel through airports in Northern Ireland, which has almost the same population as the Border, midlands and west region. Knock Airport, however, with a projected figure of 500,000 passengers this year, is the starkest example of the failure to develop the BMW region. It is an example of unbalanced regional development and we are paying for it.

Knock Airport has a longer runway than Cork, yet it has been the poor relation for Government investments. The problem with Government funding to Knock International Airport is that it is tied to safety and security developments there. In the south and east, however, airport investment is directed to expanding the existing airports rather than just airport safety and security.

For years, Dublin has benefited from public sector support and is now capable of supporting substantial investment in other airports, such as Cork and Shannon. Knock has no such relationship with a large cash cow. Between now and 2007, an investment of €18 million is required at Knock to provide the airport with category 2 status which would greatly reduce any chance of plane diversions. It would also provide an expanded airport apron so there would be adequate space for large aircraft, such as the Airbus, which now use Knock Airport. This apron ensures aeroplanes with a fast turnaround time are not delayed, and, therefore, schedules are kept.

Geographically, Knock is strategically placed. It is less than a one hour drive from nine regional urban centres or gateways and is the only effective international airport for most of them. Traffic numbers at Knock Airport in January and February last grew by 101% compared to the same period last year. In the past six months two new Gatwick routes, a Liverpool route and a second Birmingham route have been added to the existing routes at the airport.

Despite this, the Government intends to provide a second terminal at Dublin Airport at a cost of €150 million, which is projected to suck in 38 million passengers by 2025 and will further congest Dublin, where traffic is already reduced to the pace of an ass and cart. Getting in and out of Dublin Airport will continue to be a total nightmare. This is madness while an international airport at Knock lies underdeveloped and under-utilised, with one 40th of the passenger numbers of Dublin Airport. It beggars belief and flies in the face of common sense, as well as contradicting Government policy on balanced regional development and the national development plan. Just to the north, Northern Ireland, of a similar size and population to the west, has six million passengers compared to 500,000 at Knock. It is estimated that 5,000 new jobs will be created due to the building of the second terminal. They should be located at Knock and in the BMW region, where net industrial output grew by only 3.7% annually between 1990 and 1997 compared to 12.7% gross nationally.

Bed nights in tourist accommodation are down by 20% in the west although tourist numbers rose by 6% nationally, a point confirmed in the House yesterday by the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism, Deputy O'Donoghue, who suggested the drop was due to poor access. It is past time to end this madness. The development of Knock Airport is the answer to poor access and would do the congested Dublin Airport and its hinterland a favour. As new infrastructure would need to be put in place throughout Dublin to cope with increasing passenger numbers, rather than helping the situation a second terminal would only add to the imbalance and congestion that already exists. It is time to pull the plug and go for Knock.

I am not sure I can agree with the wording of the motion from my good friend and colleague, Deputy Cowley, in regard to Dublin Airport. Proposals on the development of Dublin Airport are in the first instance a matter for the Dublin Airport Authority, which has statutory responsibility to manage, operate and develop the airport and to provide such facilities and services as it considers necessary for aircraft and passengers.

Dublin Airport will rightly remain the country's main airport serving the needs not just of the travelling public in our capital city and the surrounding counties but of the country's tourism, business and freight sectors generally. Notwithstanding the greatly welcome increase over recent years in traffic at Shannon and Cork airports and at the regional airports, including Knock Airport, Dublin Airport will remain crucial to the national economy. In this regard, passenger traffic through Dublin Airport is expected to grow from more than 17 million last year to an estimated 23 million in 2009 and is forecast to increase to 30 million by around 2017. It is also noteworthy that the national spatial strategy has acknowledged that the expansion of the level of air services from Dublin Airport to a wider range of destinations is essential in the interests of underpinning Ireland's future international competitiveness.

The Minister for Transport is aware of the suggestion that the growth of Dublin Airport should be effectively capped and that further growth in Dublin-based air traffic should be catered for by a new airport on a green field site or through increased utilisation of the regional airports. The Minister, Deputy Cullen and I do not believe this suggestion is either feasible or practicable. As the economy grows, our infrastructure development must keep pace so that new bottlenecks do not emerge in the transport system. Dublin Airport has considerable scope and capacity to expand to cater for future growth in air traffic for the foreseeable future and, accordingly, Knock Airport could be expected to service the needs of Dublin Airport's natural hinterland.

The Department of Transport is also committed to continuing enhancement of the contribution of the country's network of regional airports, including Knock Airport, to balanced regional development. I am acutely aware of the good services emanating from Knock Airport and recently had the opportunity to meet the chief executive officer and chairman of the Knock Airport Authority. I congratulate them on the manner in which they have progressed the airport.

In the past five years, Knock Airport has received more funding than any other airport through NDP capital grants and assistance with marketing, safety and security initiatives. My Department provided €2.334 million in Exchequer grants towards essential infrastructure at the airport between 2001 and 2003 under the BMW operational programme of the NDP. The most significant project supported under the measure was an impressive new departures hall, which was supported with grant-aid of approximately €1.38 million. The Minister for Transport recently announced a further allocation to the airport under the next round of this scheme and an additional €2.3 million will be available for investment in the airport between 2005 and 2007. The Department of Transport also provides funding towards current expenditure on marketing, safety and security measures and more than €2.37 million has been allocated to the airport for this purpose since 2000.

Air access to the region is also directly facilitated through the daily public service obligation, PSO, service linking the airport to Dublin. The subvention paid by my Department to the contracted PSO airline is in the region of €200 per passenger per one-way trip. The existing PSO contract expires in July 2005 and I am pleased to advise there will be an extension of PSO for the three years commencing 22 July 2005. An EU procurement process for renewal of all PSO contracts is currently under way, in accordance with EU regulations for PSO air services.

My Department will continue to assist Knock Airport in the interests of the economic development of the BMW region. However, the level of financial support would have to be carefully evaluated in line with the general scale of operations at the airport and wider transport and aviation policy. The recent growth in business at Knock Airport is encouraging. I congratulate all those involved in the management and provision of services emanating from Knock. It will help to ensure the long-term future viability of the airport as it responds to the many challenges and opportunities currently facing all airports in the increasingly competitive and liberalised aviation sector.

Road Traffic Offences.

I am glad the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell, is present. Given that this is a road traffic issue and there has recently been a tragic double fatality on the roads of Inishowen, I extend my sympathies to the Doherty and Mullen families on the immensely sad loss of their two young daughters. Alice Mullen worked for the Minister's Department in the refugee appeals tribunal section.

In many parts of the country, issues arise in regard to untaxed cars on the roads. The non-payment of car tax is unfair on other road users given that the funding ring-fenced within county councils assists directly with the standard of road provision. A car that is not taxed illustrates that some people want roads but do not want to contribute to them, leaving an added burden on other road users. It is an issue that must be addressed given that the real number of road users in any given area can mean better services for that area; for example, a national car testing centre was sought for my area but the community was told not enough vehicles were registered to warrant the centre.

Many wonder whether a different picture would emerge, should the true number of vehicles be discovered and if all vehicles that should be taxed in the jurisdiction were taxed. In the Six Counties, there is already a system of roadside surveys of unlicensed vehicles. A study in 1998 revealed that at that time there was a level of evasion of about 10% which equated to 79,000 vehicles, and to £12 million sterling being lost to the Exchequer. Have we any idea of our rate of unlicensed vehicles? Have we done any surveys?

The Northern excise duty wheel clamping campaign in September 2001 led to 28,000 motorists voluntarily re-licensing their vehicles so that £3.2 million sterling that would otherwise have been lost was regained. To know we have a problem is one thing; to do something about it is another. It would be possible to have small campaigns or surveys carried out at local authority level if the authorities were funded to do so. In this age of cross-Border co-operation we should surely examine the system in operation for three years in Northern Ireland and learn from that experience.

In 2002, Sam Foster introduced the Stingray system in Belfast. It consisted of a new automatic number plate reading camera to detect unlicensed vehicles. It is secure and tamper-proof, can work day and night and can detect vehicles travelling in excess of 100 mph. The speed camera technology it employs works in the same manner as the speed detection vans in that the cameras are located in special vans. They are mobile and can operate from hard shoulders, bridges and so on. The camera reads the licence plate of the car and automatically and simultaneously checks it against the licensing records of the driver of the vehicle. It stores images of the cars found to be unlicensed. This photographic evidence can be presented in court in support of prosecutions.

This resource, if deployed in the Republic, would have the potential to detect road tax dodgers. It is not merely a question of the tax disc. I assume that our records can deal with the retention and recovery of information in the same way as happens in Northern Ireland. However, given that in the Republic insurance and national car test discs are also displayed on windscreens, the system has even more potential if deployed on the spot, with the unlicensed car, when detected, followed either by motorcycle or by the van itself. This could lead to the discovery of non-display of insurance details or of motorists not being insured or not in compliance with NCT requirements.

This is a different issue from the controversy we heard of this morning in which gardaí themselves said some people are picked on as soft options, namely, people driving at 35 mph being caught in a 30 mph zone, and that real road safety issues needed to be dealt with. Untaxed cars are possibly also uninsured and may not have passed the NCT, so they are a safety hazard not only to themselves but to other road users.

When I raised this issue in August 2004 with the Minister for Transport, he put the matter firmly back in the area of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform because, as he said, the enforcement of road traffic legislation was a matter for the Garda and it would be up to it if it wanted to employ such a system. He said that if it decided to do so, it would seek an amendment to the Road Traffic Act. Accordingly, I raise this issue with the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and not the Minister for Transport as the matter has already been passed back and forth between the two Departments.

North-South reciprocal arrangements need to be developed in regard to the collection of fines for all road traffic offences, particularly if Northern car owners commit offences in the Republic and vice versa. I would appreciate it if the Minister would consider my thoughts on this issue and do his best with regard to introducing a system similar to the one working successfully in Northern Ireland. There may even be a more effective system of detecting people driving on our roads untaxed, possibly uninsured and possibly not fulfilling NCT requirements. Those people might accordingly be in very dangerous vehicles, creating hazards to themselves and, just as importantly, to those they meet on the roads.

I am grateful to Deputy Keaveney for raising this matter. I share her concern at the presence of untaxed vehicles on our roads. As she points out, honest motorists are fed up with the small hardcore who continually evade paying their road taxes. The Exchequer loses millions in revenue each year to those evaders.

I was interested to hear the Deputy say that she had raised this issue in the past with the Department of Transport and was told it was the responsibility of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. If I were circulating a script tonight, it might give the opposite impression, so I am not circulating a script. I will confine myself to taking a positive view of what the Deputy said.

Essentially, this is a number plate recognition system. I believe that in the United Kingdom it is operated by non-police personnel. It can be left deployed merely to record that a particular car passed a particular place. The fact that a car is on the road can then be relayed either for immediate or subsequent evaluation to decide whether the car was taxed. Such equipment can clearly be useful but it would depend on the equipment being interoperable with the computerised motor vehicle file system of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. It would also have to be interoperable with the summonsing method being used in the points system for speeding offences and so on.

Three Departments have a responsibility for this issue which is contiguous and which should be managed in a co-ordinated way. Rather than trying to pass the buck back, I will call on my colleagues in the Departments of Transport and the Environment, Heritage and Local Government to attempt to ensure that technology of this kind is available to the Garda Síochána.

As the Deputy knows, we are increasing Garda numbers, currently by 2,000 extra recruits. The road traffic corps will be increased from about 500 to 1,200 so that on a cumulative basis, 700 of the new recruits will be allocated to road traffic duties over the next three years. I want to ensure that those additional gardaí are on frontline policing duties and not spending their time dealing with paper work in back offices. The Garda Commissioner is in full agreement with me on this.

To get compliance in areas such as this and to save valuable Garda resources, a computerised system which is interoperable with the databases to which I referred is the appropriate way forward. I thank the Deputy for raising the matter and I intend to discuss it with the Minister for Transport, Deputy Cullen, and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Roche. I will then give the Deputy a considered response regarding the logistical implications of mirroring in this State the system which operates in Northern Ireland and in other parts of the United Kingdom. I hope that the initiative the Deputy has taken in drawing this technological possibility to my attention will not be wasted for want of co-ordination between the three responsible Departments.

Garda Investigations.

I am obliged to the Ceann Comhairle for permitting me yet again to raise the Dean Lyons case, the facts of which are well known.

In July 1997, Dean Lyons, a homeless heroin addict, was arrested and questioned in connection with the brutal killing of two vulnerable women in sheltered health board accommodation in Grangegorman. He was questioned by detective gardaí in a video and tape recording suite and, as was his wont, admitted to every charge put to him. His parents said he was completely disoriented and was swaying and slurring his words. After they left him he was questioned again but this time there was no video or audio taping. As a result, he made a written statement containing a chronologically correct narrative about the murders in clear grammatical English and with vivid and chilling accuracy he described the murder scene. On the basis of his confession he was charged with the murders. If his trial had proceeded, it would have been impossible for him to withdraw a confession that contained such accurate and unpublished detail. We know now that Dean Lyons did not commit the Grangegorman murders and the Garda Commissioner has apologised to his family.

A number of questions arise, fundamental questions that so far neither the Garda nor the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has answered. How did it transpire that a strung-out heroin addict confessed in such a manner and in such accurate and unpublished detail when he did not commit the murders? Only the real killer and the investigating gardaí could have known the detail in his statement.

There is no need for me to spell out the only reasonable inference to be drawn. It is, unless it can somehow be explained, a profoundly disturbing inference for the administration of justice in this democracy. Why was Dean Lyons held in custody for eight months and then released without explanation? Why was another man who confessed to the Grangegorman murders never brought to trial?

The internal inquiry conducted by the Garda Síochána has been kept secret and up to now the Minister, Deputy McDowell, has demonstrated little public interest in confronting the implications of this case or in allaying public disquiet. This was a particularly unequal confrontation between the forces of the State and one of its more inadequate citizens. Law-abiding citizens cannot avoid the conclusion that Dean Lyons, for whatever reason, was stitched up by a member or members of the Garda Síochána for a crime he did not commit.

Two vulnerable women have been murdered and the murder remains unsolved. Could it happen again? The Minister must confront the implications of this case made in my submission. He must cause these extraordinary events to be properly investigated and report the outcome and conclusions to this House together with whatever recommendations are necessary to protect against a recurrence.

I thank Deputy Rabbitte for raising this matter. The facts of this case have been outlined to the House on a number of occasions. I do not propose to set them out again in full, but a brief summary may be helpful.

The main facts, as notified to me by the Garda authorities, are as follows. Sylvia Shiels and Mary Callinan were murdered on the night of 6-7 March 1997 as they were sleeping. Public reaction to the murders and the reaction of the House were ones of strong condemnation. In July of that year, the late Mr. Dean Lyons apparently made a full confession to investigating Garda officers of his alleged guilt in the double murder. This confession was recorded on audio-video tape. Later the same day he apparently signed a further detailed written admission of his alleged involvement in the murders. It is claimed that at his request this second interview was not audio-visually recorded.

Following consultation between the Garda Síochána and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Dean Lyons was charged with one of the murders at Grangegorman. In August 1997, another person, who had been arrested and detained during the investigation of another double murder, made a confession with regard to the Grangegorman murders. However, that person later retracted those admissions. This all happened before the change of Government.

As a result of the admissions made by the second person, the Garda Commissioner appointed an assistant commissioner to review all available evidence on these murders. The Garda authorities state that this investigation indicated that Mr. Lyons did not commit the murders in question. The assistant commissioner was also of the view that the inquiry established that the manner in which Mr. Lyons had been interviewed with regard to the case was in compliance with the regulations that had come into effect a short time earlier on 1 March.

Following completion of this review, the assistant commissioner submitted a report to the Director of Public Prosecutions. In April 1998, after consideration of the report, the Director of Public Prosecutions decided that criminal proceedings against Mr. Lyons should be discontinued. In July 1999, Mr. Lyons, at his solicitor's offices, presented a signed and witnessed statement denying any involvement in the Grangegorman murders. Having considered the file submitted to him by the Garda on the second individual, who had confessed to the murders and later retracted the confession, the DPP decided that no prosecution should take place against any person.

As the House is aware, when the DPP decides not to prosecute in a particular case, the reasons for the decision are given to the Chief State Solicitor and the investigating gardaí. The director has stated that it is not his policy to disclose this information otherwise. The Supreme Court has upheld this policy. The function with regard to the prosecution of alleged offences is the responsibility of the Director of Public Prosecutions who is independent in the exercise of his functions. It would, therefore, not be appropriate to intervene or comment on his decisions.

As the Deputy stated, the Garda Síochána press and public relations office published on 24 February on behalf of the Garda Commissioner a notice in a number of newspapers in which it stated that it is satisfied that Dean Lyons had no participation in the murders and that the Garda appreciate the embarrassment suffered by his family as a result of criminal charges preferred against him and subsequently withdrawn. The Garda Síochána regrets and apologises to the family of Mr. Lyons for any embarrassment caused. I have already expressed the hope that this apology will bring closure for the Lyons family.

The Deputy nonetheless requests a full investigation into the circumstances of the charging of Mr. Lyons. Consideration of his request would have to be in conjunction with consideration of representations received by me from solicitors representing the sister of one of the victims which request that there be an independent public inquiry into the Garda investigation of the murder. The request is grounded on the protections afforded by the European Convention on Human Rights.

I indicated to the House previously that I am not satisfied that the Garda investigation has fallen short of the standard required by the European Convention on Human Rights or of the potential effectiveness of a full public tribunal of inquiry. However, in view of the matters raised, and to assist me in my consideration of the request, I asked the solicitor to whom I have already referred to outline in further detail the reasons he considers a public inquiry to be necessary. I have received a response and, while it does not put forward further details, I referred the correspondence to the Attorney General. In addition, I expect to receive a detailed report, which I requested from the Garda authorities on matters arising in this case. I will consider the matter further, taking into account any further submissions made to me, advice from the Attorney General and the further report from the Garda authorities.

As I previously indicated to the House, the Deputy will appreciate that the criminal investigation into these two murders is not closed and this would have clear implications for what further action, if any, I may consider. As a general principle, the release into the public domain of any existing report on the conduct of an investigation which is not closed, the holding of an inquiry or the issuing of an explanation of events, all of which have been suggested in this case, may be prejudicial to any prosecution with regard to crimes which might be commenced in the future. Therefore, I would also have to consult with the DPP as to whether any publication of a new report would tend to prejudice the live possibility of a prosecution.

A statutory provision exists under section 12 of the Dublin Police Act 1924, as amended recently and updated by section 15(4) of the Garda Síochána Complaints Act 1986, for me to appoint a person to conduct a sworn inquiry into any allegation of misuse of powers by a member of the Garda Síochána. I will inform the House when I have completed my consideration of the matter.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.30 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 24 March 2004.
Top
Share