Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005

Vol. 600 No. 4

Crime Prevention.

Last night, I visited St. James's Hospital and met the family of a young man who is in a coma having suffered brain damage and various fractures. The young man is gay and was coming from a gay establishment on Saturday night, when a gang set upon him. He was viciously beaten, was thrown over a railing into St. Audeon's Park and left for dead at 1 a.m. on Sunday. He was found at 9 a.m., was taken to hospital and is still in a coma. He had been assaulted a week previously and robbed by a group who were identified as gay bashers. The area is at the junction between a gay establishment on one side of the Liffey and a road coming up from the south side. It seems that there are a number of gangs operating around the area.

A young man is fighting for his life in hospital. We are not exactly sure of the extent of the damage that has been done to him. When I made inquiries, I found out that people coming from these establishments are regularly attacked by groups at a certain distance from the establishments where there are no CCTV cameras or lights. I raise this issue because it is time it was highlighted. Something must be done about it as it has been going on almost without being reported. The people in question are either afraid to report, they are embarrassed to report, or they do not believe that anything will be done about it. It represents a serious assault on citizens.

The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform should take some significant action on this matter. This means extra patrols of gardaí. The area is patrolled by gardaí from Kevin Street and Pearse Street, but according to accounts, there is little actual patrolling. The gardaí are aware that this is happening and are the first to admit it, yet there is no significant patrolling to protect the people who are frequenting these establishments and who may be on their way home. This young man would normally look for a taxi on his way home to Crumlin.

We need extra resources in this area. We need minority specialist liaison officers who can deal with the matter in the first instance. I know there are some who deal mainly with ethnic groups, but all minorities are subject to being targeted by certain hit groups. We are well aware of this group but we have not dealt with it. The Minister will have to look directly at the flash points that can be identified. They can be targeted with extra personnel, with CCTV cameras and it will be a deliberate decision to do it. We do not know the outcome of this young man's condition, which may yet end in absolute tragedy. Whatever happens, he will never be fully healthy again.

People engaged in homophobic crimes seem to be able to operate with reasonable impunity. I call on the Minister to take some specific steps. A programme will have to be put in place to deal with this particular insidious crime.

I thank the Deputy for raising this matter and I am aware of recent media reports on the issue. I am deputising for the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, who is unavailable. The Minister has asked me to assure the Deputy that he shares his concern, as well as that of the public in general, about attacks on minority members of our population.

The Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989 created an offence of publishing or distributing material or using words or behaviour that are threatening, abusive or insulting and are intended, or are likely, to stir up hatred. "Hatred" is defined as hatred against a group of persons in the State or elsewhere on account of their race, colour, nationality, religion, ethnic or national origins, membership of the Traveller community or sexual orientation. Public incitement to racial hatred is a criminal offence under section 2 and section 3 of the 1989 Act in terms of material, written or oral, which is threatening, abusive or insulting.

The previous Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform announced a review of the incitement to hatred legislation at a time when few, if any, successful prosecutions had been taken under the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989. One of the aims of the review was to ascertain whether problems with the Act were contributing to this lack of prosecutions and, if so, whether any reasonable changes to it could remedy that. Since the review was announced a number of successful prosecutions have been taken under the 1989 Act and, where appropriate, under public order legislation or Córas Iompair Éireann by-laws. These trends are being monitored as part of the ongoing review and if maintained could have a significant influence on the outcome of the review and any subsequent proposals for legislation.

The Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 created an offence with regard to using or engaging in threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour in a public place. It also created an offence of distributing or displaying in a public place, material which is threatening, abusive, insulting or obscene. The Garda authorities, conscious of the importance of recording and monitoring incidents that are motivated by racism, sectarianism, homophobia, xenophobia and anti-Semitism, have, since October 2002 and through the PULSE system, put in place a mechanism to record and gather information on racist incidents and offenders nationwide. The Garda racial and intercultural office, which was established in 2001, coordinates, monitors and advises on all aspects of policing in the area of ethnic and cultural diversity. Personnel at that office monitor all incidents to ensure that the PULSE system accurately records all such offences. Where such incidents occur, the Garda Síochána ensures that an investigation is pursued with reference to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 and the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989, which are the main relevant legislative instruments pertaining to hate crime.

The Garda Síochána Bill 2004 emphasises the importance of upholding human rights in the performance by gardaí of their functions. The Bill also provides for a revised form of declaration for persons joining the force, which specifically refers to the need to have regard for human rights in carrying out policing duties. The Minister has also made provision in this Bill for the establishment of a code of ethics for the Garda Síochána. The purpose of the code of ethics will be to lay down standards of conduct and practice for members. The Minister would like to congratulate the Commissioner for commissioning the Garda human rights audit and for publishing the audit, which identifies certain shortcomings in respect of the force, in an open and transparent manner. In response to the findings and recommendations of the consultants, the Commissioner is drafting a comprehensive action plan to respond to the shortcomings identified.

This action plan will put human rights to the fore in all aspects of the management and operation of the Garda Síochána. An assistant commissioner, who is head of human resource management, has been given specific responsibility to monitor, oversee and ensure the implementation of all aspects of the report. The Minister understands that at a recent management seminar at the Garda College, Templemore, senior officers at chief superintendent and commissioner rank received an extensive briefing on the audit and the action plan.

More generally, and underpinning the Government's commitment to accommodate and respect cultural diversity, the Government published its national action plan against racism in January this year. The overall aim of the plan is to provide strategic direction to combat racism and to develop a more inclusive, intercultural society based on a commitment to inclusion by design — not an add-on or afterthought, but based on policies that promote interaction, equality of opportunity, understanding and respect.

One of the key objectives of the plan is to provide effective protection and redress against racism, including a focus on discrimination, threatening behaviour and incitement to hatred. Clearly, the Garda has a very important role in this and considerable work has been done by it, including the establishment of the Garda racial and intercultural office, the appointment of 145 ethnic liaison gardaí and the development of training methods for policing a more diverse society.

Garda management is satisfied that the areas frequented by members of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, GLBT, are adequately policed. The policing requirements in these areas are reviewed on an ongoing basis so as to enable a response to any particular eventuality should the need arise. I assure the Deputy that the Minister will not tolerate any attacks on minority members of society. There is no place in our society for people who carry out this type of crime.

Waste Water Treatment Plants.

This is an important issue. Since first requesting this Adjournment debate, more facts have come to light which confirm my worst suspicions and vindicate the position I have taken on this issue for some time. What we have witnessed during the entire sorry saga of the Ringsend waste water treatment plant is a lack of transparency and accountability as well as a level of incompetence which is difficult to comprehend.

This is not just a story about a bad smell, although at this stage one could justifiably say that the whole thing stinks. It has more to do with bad infrastructural planning and the misuse of taxpayers' money. For some time I have contended, on the basis of off-the-record comments from people working in the plant, that the sewage treatment plant, which was hailed as a state-of-the-art facility, was working at full capacity. It was only after the news item last week, which highlighted the fact that the European Commission was to take legal action against Ireland for breaches of EU directives, that I received further tip-offs about the plant.

I was forced to go to the Commission because I was being fobbed off continually by the city council and the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. I warmly congratulate the Commission for acting so promptly on foot of my official complaint, but its members will have a lot more on their plate when they discover what has been going on there. It is worth noting that the bulk of money invested in this plant came from the European Union.

Yesterday evening, I attended a meeting of the Institution of Engineers of Ireland where I was given the opportunity to put a number of direct questions to Mr. Mark Driver, operations director, and Ms Jane Bickerstaffe, operations and maintenance manager of the Ringsend waste water treatment plant. When I asked them directly if the plant was now operating at capacity they replied that they were "flat out". I also put a question about whether there was space available to expand the plant. They confirmed that the space was there but that they were dependent on the "powers that be" to supply the finance. Their forthrightness on this matter contrasts with the furtiveness of the Irish authorities. A person in the audience then approached me and told me that the Government was going to give approval for the expansion of the plant because of the capacity problem. This was news to me. Subsequently, I contacted RTE.

The House may recall that last week my colleague, Deputy Sargent, put a direct question to the Taoiseach about the plant. For whatever reason, however, the Taoiseach chose not to reveal this important fact. The Taoiseach ducked and dived in his usual way and all we got from the Tánaiste, Deputy Harney, and the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell, were sniggers and sneers. I had always thought that the Progressive Democrats, at least, were concerned about value for money, or so they tell us. Do they share my concern about this badly botched infrastructural project?

The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and I shared a studio during the "News at One" programme last week and when I again raised these important issues the Minister conveniently refused to answer direct questions. The questions I posed then were whether the Government would investigate fully what was going on at that plant and, if sludge was being transported from the plant to Carlow, why did the Taoiseach and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government not state that there were fundamental problems at the plant? The city council has been forced to admit that there are problems and that it will have to be expanded. As I understand it, however, the plant is now operating at full capacity. Dublin City Council has clearly miscalculated the load, a fundamental error. This should be a matter of grave concern for the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

The other major question about this plant is the movement of sludge. The Minister will be aware that the movement of sewage sludge is heavily regulated under EU directives and Irish law. We now learn that serious questions are being raised over the handling of sludge from Ringsend. Sludge is only supposed to leave this plant after being dried and processed into a biological fertiliser, which is called Biofert. However, we learn that large quantities of sludge have been shipped to Carlow for disposal without first being processed into Biofert. We have heard accounts of open lorries transporting liquid sludge under cover of darkness and of unlicensed operators storing and disposing of sludge on agricultural land. Should any of these accounts prove to be true, we are dealing not with incompetence but serious illegality.

The admission that this plant does not have enough capacity to meet the needs of the city should be enough to prompt the Minister to investigate this issue. However, given that there are serious indications of illegal handling of waste, there can be no more excuses. It is time for the Minister, Deputy Roche, to come clean on these issues and order an investigation, which is urgently required.

I thank Deputy Gormley for raising this matter which is of major concern to people in the Ringsend area.

The European Commission's proposed legal action concerning odours from sewage plants arose as a result of a complaint about the Greystones waste water treatment plant which, I understand, has long since been resolved. The Commission's concern is no longer particular to any sewage treatment plant but relates to the need to provide general rules for odour control for all such plants.

In so far as the question of odours from treatment plants generally is concerned, my Department is finalising a draft of regulations providing for amendment of the binding rules on sanitary authorities relating to the design, construction, operation and management of urban waste water treatment plants to address odours from such plants. The draft regulations will set requirements for treatment plants to avoid causing nuisance through noise or odours and will require records of all mandatory environmental standards and environmental complaints arising from plants, including noise and odours, to be maintained. The draft regulations will be finalised shortly and a copy will be sent to the Commission to allow it to furnish comments before the regulations are made.

With regard to Ringsend, there is no argument but that there have been intermittent difficulties with odours since the plant was opened. It is a complex and compact facility involving advanced technology. It was absolutely essential to go for an innovative solution to fit the plant into the limited space available on the Ringsend site. Inevitably, some teething problems have been, and are being, vigorously addressed by the city council and by the contractor who operates the plant on the council's behalf.

I accept that when odours have occurred they have been unpleasant for residents who have experienced them. However, following an independent audit commissioned by the council to identify the causes, a programme of works has been implemented which has, I understand, greatly improved the overall situation since the summer of 2004. Unfortunately, the odour problem re-emerged for a short time earlier this year due to maintenance procedures on site, which have since been completed.

The environmental impact statement for the Ringsend treatment plant, certified in 1997, set odour limits to be met at the boundary of the site. These standards were incorporated into the contract the city council entered into with the contracting consortium. Additional odour treatment equipment and measures were progressively incorporated into the plant over the summer of 2004 following the initial problems in meeting the odour limits. These measures have significantly improved the performance of the plant, and the city council is working closely with the consortium in seeking resolution of the outstanding issues to fully comply with the odour standards in the environmental impact statement.

Without in any way diminishing the discomfort the odours have caused, it would be wrong to lose sight of the tremendous boon the Ringsend plant has proved for the people of Dublin and for environmental standards across Dublin bay. The new plant provides advanced secondary waste water treatment, including disinfection, to the exacting standards laid down in the EU urban waste water treatment directive for a population equivalent of 1.7 million people in areas as far apart as Dún Laoghaire, Ratoath, Ashbourne and Portmarnock. The new plant has replaced the basic primary treatment that previously existed for roughly two thirds of the waste water from the Dublin region and no treatment for the remainder which was discharged into the bay in its raw state.

The dumping of untreated sewage has long ceased. Water quality in Dublin bay has radically improved and blue flags can be expected on Dublin beaches this summer, a unique achievement for a European capital. Let us not overlook these positive factors but be assured that any lingering problems with the Ringsend plant are being systematically addressed and will be eliminated for good as quickly as possible.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.25 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 20 April 2005.
Top
Share