Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 27 Apr 2005

Vol. 601 No. 3

Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2005: Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The main purpose of this Bill is to implement the recommendations in the report of the independent constituency commission, published in January 2004, on revisions to the Dáil constituencies for the next general election. A copy of the report was given to each Member of the Oireachtas when it was presented to the Ceann Comhairle. At the outset, it may be helpful to outline the principal constitutional and legal requirements relating to the establishment and revision of Dáil constituencies and other relevant background to the Bill.

Article 16.2.3° of the Constitution provides that:

The ratio between the number of Members to be elected at any time for each constituency and the population of each constituency, as ascertained at the last preceding census, shall, so far as it is practicable, be the same throughout the country.

This provision was considered by the courts in two landmark cases in 1961, the High Court case of John O'Donovan v. the Attorney General, and the Supreme Court reference case relating to the Electoral (Amendment) Bill 1961. In neither of these cases did the courts quantify the precise degree of equality of representation that is required by the Constitution, although Mr. Justice Budd in the O’Donovan case appeared to suggest a departure of approximately 5% from strict mathematical parity would be acceptable.

Dealing with the question of equality of representation in the reference case, the Supreme Court stated it could not lay down a figure above or below which a variation from the national average population per Deputy is not permitted. The court stressed that the practical considerations which ought to be taken into account, and the weight that should be attached to them in departing from strict equality of representation, are primarily matters for the Oireachtas and should not be reviewed by the courts unless there is a "manifest infringement" of the relevant article of the Constitution. The court concluded the test to be applied is whether the failure to maintain the ratio between the number of Members for each constituency and the population of each constituency involves such a divergence as to make it clear the Oireachtas has not carried out the intention of the relevant constitutional provisions.

A referendum in 1968 to amend the Constitution to provide that the population per Deputy could not be greater or less than the national average by more than one sixth was defeated on the same day as a proposal to change the voting system. In each revision of constituencies between 1961 and 1974, the limit of 5%, referred to in the O'Donovan case, was adhered to. However, more substantial departures from mathematical equality of representation were provided for in the revisions carried out since 1974, based on the recommendations of independent commissions. The maximum departure since 1980 was 7.89% below the national average in the constituency of Mayo East in 1983. The proposed constituencies in the Bill are within this range.

Article 16.2.4° of the Constitution provides that, "The Oireachtas shall revise the constituencies at least once in every 12 years, with due regard to changes in distribution of the population". This, in effect, requires that constituencies be revised whenever population changes result in populations per Deputy in individual constituencies that are significantly out of line with national average representation. Therefore, section 5 of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that, on publication of the relevant CSO report on a population census, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government must set up a commission to report on Dáil and European constituencies. The membership of the commission is specified in the Act, together with its terms of reference, which are subordinate to the relevant constitutional provisions, and a requirement that the commission reports within six months of its establishment.

Article 16.2.2° of the Constitution provides that:

The number of Members shall from time to time be fixed by law, but the total number of Members of Dáil Éireann shall not be fixed at less than one Member for each 30,000 of the population, or at more than one Member for each 20,000 of the population.

Based on the population in 2002, this provision would allow for Dáil membership to be fixed within a range of 131 and 196 seats. However, the statutory terms of reference for constituency commissions provide that the total Dáil membership shall be not less than 164 and not more than 168 members. In accordance with the reports of successive commissions, the total Dáil membership has been fixed at 166 since 1980.

Finally, Article 16.2.6° provides that, "No law shall be enacted whereby the number of Members to be returned for any constituency shall be less than three." The statutory terms of reference of a commission provide that constituencies must be represented by three, four or five members. This is the background against which the provisions are introduced. I have outlined the historical background because it is important that we remind ourselves occasionally how we have reached the current position in terms of constituencies and Dáil membership.

As Members are aware, for more than half a century after the founding of the State, changes in constituencies were formulated and advanced by the Government of the day. This process has occasionally been the subject of criticism from across the political spectrum, especially from those parties in Opposition, including my own, when such changes were made. The first constituency commission was set up in 1977 to report on constituencies for the first direct elections to the European Parliament in 1979. The first Dáil constituency commission was established in 1980 on a non-statutory basis and such commissions continued to report on constituency revisions until the enactment of the Electoral Act 1997. The commission that reported in January 2004 is the second statutory commission established under the Act.

Volume 1 of the 2002 census reports was published in July 2003. This showed an increase in total population from 1996 of over 291,000, giving a total 2002 population in the State of 3,917,203. Thus, each of the 166 Deputies represented an average of 23,598 persons in 2002. The detailed population figures for each constituency showed there were serious variances from the national average population per Deputy in many constituencies. In 22 constituencies there were variances from national average representation in excess of 5% and 13 had deviations in excess of 8%. The most under-represented constituencies were Kildare North and Dublin West with variances of +20.73% and +16.43% respectively. The most over-represented constituencies were Dublin North-West and Sligo-Leitrim with variances of -11.89% and -11.01% respectively. Significant changes are therefore necessary in some areas to secure equality of representation between constituencies based on the 2002 census and to comply with the constitutional norms.

In accordance with section 5 of the 1997 Act, a constituency commission was set up in July 2003, chaired by Mr Justice Vivian Lavan. The other members of the commission were Mr. Kieran Coughlan, Clerk of the Dáil, Ms Deirdre Lane, Clerk of the Seanad, Mr. Niall Callan, Secretary General of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, and Ms Emily O'Reilly, the Ombudsman. I take this opportunity to thank the commission members for the conscientious and impartial manner in which they carried out their work. I particularly compliment Mr. Justice Lavan on the clarity of his presentation.

Section 6 of the 1997 Act provides that a constituency commission shall, in observing the relevant provisions of the Constitution, have regard to a number of principles. The total number of members of the Dáil shall be not less than 164 and not more than 168. Each constituency shall return three, four or five members. The breaching of county boundaries shall be avoided as far as practicable. However, this restriction does not extend to city boundaries or to the administrative county boundaries in Dublin. Each constituency shall be composed of contiguous areas. There shall be regard to geographical considerations, including significant physical features and the extent and density of population in each constituency. Finally, subject to those provisions, the commission shall endeavour to maintain continuity in the arrangement of constituencies. The constituency commission approaches its task with a clearly established remit.

The constituency commission presented its report on European Parliament constituencies in September 2003. Its recommendations were enacted in the European Parliament Elections (Amendment) Act 2004 and were applied at the European elections in June 2004. The main features of the commission's January 2004 report on Dáil constituencies are as follows. First, there should be no change in the existing level of Dáil membership of 166 seats. Second, there will be a net increase of one in the number of constituencies, from 42 to 43. Third, there will be an extra seat in the Kildare North constituency, expanding to a four-seater constituency, and in County Meath, where two three-seaters will be established. As Deputies well know, given our recent adventures in that county——

Will there be a few more left seats there?

There is currently one five-seat constituency for that county.

Fourth, there will be a reduction of one seat in the constituency of Cork North-Central, reducing to four seats, as well as across counties Sligo, Leitrim, Roscommon and Longford combined. There will be a new constituency configuration in the north Connacht-north Leinster area, with new three-seaters named Sligo-North Leitrim and Roscommon-South Leitrim, and a new four-seater named Longford-Westmeath. That new formation brings to an end the breach of a provincial boundary inherent in the existing Longford-Roscommon constituency, but it involves breaching the boundaries of counties Leitrim and Westmeath. I well understand the concerns that have been expressed on the matter by public representatives from all sides.

In Dublin, the existing profile of 47 seats spread over 12 constituencies is retained, but in a new configuration of three five-seat constituencies, five four-seaters and four three-seaters. The new arrangement transfers a population of almost 31,000 in major boundary adjustments, affecting six constituencies, with minor adjustments affecting four others. The main changes recommended in Dublin are as follows. First, there is to be an extra seat in Dublin Mid-West, currently a three-seat constituency, with the addition from Dublin West of about 12,000 people in the Palmerstown area. Second, there will be a reduction of one seat in Dublin North-Central, currently a four-seater, with the transfer of almost 11,000 people in the Edenmore and Beaumont-Whitehall areas to Dublin North-East and Dublin North-West constituencies respectively. Third, there will be a transfer from Dublin North to Dublin West of almost 4,000 people in the St. Margaret's-Kilsallaghan area to the west of Dublin Airport. Fourth, there will be a transfer from Dublin West to Dublin North-West of about 1,100 in the Dunsink-Cappagh area. Fifth, there will be a transfer from Dublin Central to Dublin South-Central of almost 1,000 people in Islandbridge. Finally, there is to be a transfer from Dublin South to Dublin South-West of almost 2,000 people in the Firhouse area to the west of the M50.

The constituency commission's terms of reference include the avoidance of breaches of county boundaries as far as practicable. The commission's recommendations have on occasion been criticised for not keeping to county, or indeed provincial, boundaries. Although attachment to such boundaries is understandable and is part and parcel of the way we are in this country, the terms of reference of commissions are subordinate to the relevant constitutional provisions, which do not refer to counties or provinces. There is no such mention in the relevant judgments and adjudications mentioned. The High Court judgment of Mr. Justice Budd in the O'Donovan case is most frequently cited. It stated:

although a system in the main based on counties has in fact been adopted, there is nothing in the Constitution about constituencies being based on counties. The Constitution does not say that in forming the constituencies according to the required ratio, that shall be done so far as is practicable having regard to county boundaries.

In other words, there is silence on the county boundaries issue.

The Government has accepted the commission's recommendations as a single package of related measures bringing Dáil constituencies into line with the prevailing population patterns, in accordance with constitutional imperatives and the associated legal requirements. We can all recognise that it might have been possible for the commission to suggest solutions other than those recommended in its report. However, the commission took account of the nearly 100 submissions made to it in formulating its recommendations, and its independent determination of the issues should now be respected. By cherry picking individual recommendations, we would undermine the reasons for establishing an independent commission in the first place. It is the Government's firm view that the precedent of adhering to the commission's advice should not be broken. Consequently, I must advise the House that I cannot foresee circumstances where I will be accepting amendments to the Bill that change the constituency formation recommended by the commission.

To facilitate Members of the House in familiarising themselves with the changes to individual constituencies, I am arranging for Ordnance Survey Ireland to produce maps of each constituency for circulation to Deputies. Members of the House should have those shortly.

Will they be in colour?

They will be in full colour.

The Minister could put his photographs in them.

I will do my best to ensure that Deputy Broughan has a detailed canvas map, as I am aware that there are detailed changes to be made in his area. I will do my best to be accommodating to members in that regard.

I will outline the main provisions of the Bill. Section 2 provides that the number of Members of Dáil Éireann after the next dissolution will be 166. As I have said, that is the same number as at present, and it is the number recommended by the commission. Sections 3 and 4 provide that, after the next dissolution, the Members of Dáil Éireann will represent the 43 constituencies specified in the Schedule, as recommended by the commission. This represents a net increase of one in the number of constituencies compared with the existing constituency formation, which remains in force for the purpose of any by-elections up to the time of the next dissolution of the Dáil. Section 5 provides for the repeal of the Electoral (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1998, which specifies the existing Dáil constituencies. The repeal will come into operation on the next dissolution of the Dáil.

The schedule contains the formal definition of the 43 constituencies, the main details of which I have already set out. In summary, it provides for the creation of five new constituencies, the replacement of four existing constituencies, changes to 23 constituencies and the retention of 15 existing constituencies. Overall, 12 five-seat constituencies, 13 four-seat constituencies and 18 three-seat constituencies are proposed.

I should deal with section 6 in some detail. I know from my conversations with Deputy O'Dowd that the section has caused some concerns. Section 6 addresses a technical issue that has been raised by the Standards in Public Office Commission in relation to the definition of election expenses for the purposes of the Electoral Act 1997. Paragraph 2 of the Schedule to that Act sets out certain items that are not to be regarded as election expenses for the purposes of the Act. Following the High Court and Supreme Court decisions on the Desmond Kelly case in 2002, section 33 of the Electoral (Amendment) Act 2004 deleted from paragraph 2 of the Schedule to the 1997 Act the reference to services, facilities and so on provided out of public funds. The effect of that deletion is that, in accordance with the courts' rulings, such services are now reckonable for the purpose of making statements of election expenses to the Standards in Public Office Commission. However, that section 33 deletion was inadvertently drafted to remove a number of other items, which had not been at issue in the court cases, from paragraph 2 of the Schedule to the 1997 Act. These items are as follows. The first and most important is the litir um thoghchán service, the so-called free postage for candidates.

Debate adjourned.
Sitting suspended at 1.30 p.m. and resumed at 2.30 p.m.
Top
Share