Vol. 621 No. 7
51 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to a new study from the Combat Poverty Agency which shows that the increasing levels of indirect taxation here are having a disproportionate effect on those on lower incomes; the efforts he is making to ensure that those on low incomes receive sufficient supports to deflect the impact of these indirect taxes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22990/06]
I welcome the publication by the Combat Poverty Agency (CPA) of its new report "The Distributional Impact of Ireland's Indirect Tax System" and the associated policy statement "Promoting Equity in Ireland's Tax System". The focus of the report is on whether and to what extent the Irish system of indirect taxation, namely VAT and excise duties, is regressive.
The report outlines that over the period 2000 to 2005, the share of total Current Exchequer Revenues represented by VAT and excises duties combined has remained unchanged at 44.5%. The authors concluded that the indirect tax system appears to be regressive in the sense that households in the lowest decile pay a higher proportion of their income in indirect taxes relative to households in the higher deciles.
However, they also noted that
—the indirect tax system includes some elements of progressivity such as low tax rates on food and fuel and zero tax rates on children's clothes and footwear, and
—that changes to some other elements could have negative effects elsewhere. For example, lowering taxes on drink and tobacco would have negative health effects.
In conclusion, the authors do not recommend adjustments to indirect taxes.
This Government remains committed to improving the standard of living of welfare dependent and low-income households. Since 1997, the lowest rates of welfare payments have increased by almost 100%, well ahead of the 49% accumulated inflation over that period. In the last Budget, the personal and qualified adult rates of payment were increased by unprecedented amounts. The lowest rates of social welfare payments, were increased by EUR17 per week to EUR165.80, or by 11.4%. This increase is well ahead of projected inflation for 2006 and, therefore, improves and enhances the living standards of all recipients.
The report also highlights the need to make work pay for low earners. This has been an important focus of Government policy and I introduced a number of important packages designed to address poverty and to reward work and enterprise in Budget 2006. These included a Child and Family Poverty package of nearly €155 million which involved major improvements for low-income families and for single parent families.
I also introduced a wide-ranging employment package of €28 million. This contained a range of measures which will alleviate poverty and support activation by improving income disregards and tapers for people with disabilities, the unemployed and qualified adults. These arrangements maximise the benefits of work for low-income households.
52 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the impact the lone parent proposals will have on the introduction of a part-time unemployment payment if enacted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23087/06]
54 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on whether the rules governing the new parental allowance will cause age related poverty traps if introduced; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23090/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 52 and 54 together.
The major discussion paper, "Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents" which I launched in March this year, addresses the social exclusion and risk of poverty faced by many such families and their children. The report puts forward proposals for reform of the income support system for all parents on a low income. The report proposes the expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities for lone parents, the extension of the National Employment Action Plan to focus on lone parents, focused provision of childcare, improved information services for lone parents and the introduction of a new parental allowance for low income families with young children.
The current one-parent family payment provides long term income support, until children are 18 or 22 if in full-time education, to those parenting alone, with no requirement to be available for or seeking employment. Such long term welfare dependency in respect of a person of working age is not considered to be in the best interests of the lone parent, their children or society in general. Numerous reports have indicated that employment is one of the most important routes out of poverty.
Under the proposed parental allowance, it is suggested that an element of conditionality be attached to receipt of the payment. Overall the report proposes that payment of parental allowance should cease when the youngest child reaches the end of their 7th year. This being the case, formal activation would commence when the child was age 5. This would give the parent the opportunity and supports required to engage in education or training for three years, before payment of parental allowance would cease.
There is no proposal in the Report to introduce a part-time unemployment payment. However, the Report also considered that the requirement to seek full-time work, which is inherent in the unemployment schemes of my Department, no longer reflects the atypical working patterns of many people in Ireland today, particularly women. The Report proposed that, in order to meet the ‘genuinely seeking work condition' attached to the payment of Unemployment Assistance, seeking work of 19 hours and over should be sufficient. This is in line with the conditions applying to the Family Income Supplement. It is acknowledged that using a benchmark of 19 hours may have implications for other schemes and this will need to be explored further.
Activation, as referred to in the proposal, is ‘positive' in nature; it encompasses interview/advice meetings, education and training and providing people with the skills to enable them to achieve financial independence and therefore, a better life for themselves and their children. While conditions are being suggested for receipt of payment, it is proposed that supports will be offered in a structured and systematic manner to the persons concerned. It is only in this context that continuing payment would be made conditional on engagement.
I would stress that the discussion paper acknowledges that the age to which the parental allowance should remain payable is a matter for decision by Government following the consultation process currently underway. I have listened carefully to the comments made by organisations representing lone parents at the recent consultation forum which I hosted and have asked them to submit their views and concerns in writing. I have also briefed the Oireachtas Committee on Social Affairs and debated the issue in the Seanad. I will take all of these views into account to arrive at the best possible solution for all.
I have asked the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion to draw up an implementation plan to progress the non-income recommendations of the discussion paper, including those related to childcare, education, training and activation measures and work on this has already commenced in consultation with the Departments and agencies concerned. Issues including the possible impact of the proposals on age related poverty traps, will be taken into account in the implementation of the proposals. I will listen closely to the views expressed and will give very serious consideration to them.
As soon as I am convinced that we have reached conclusions that are fully workable and equitable, it will be my intention to bring forward proposals for legislation in the course of this year.
53 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the decisions that he has made regarding possible payment to claimants whose allowance was cut following the High Court case on the back to education allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23080/06]
81 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people whose back to education allowance was cut over the summer months for each year when the non-payment of the allowance over the summer months was applied by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23079/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 53 and 81 together.
The Back to Education Allowance or BTEA is a second chance education opportunities scheme designed to encourage and facilitate people on certain social welfare payments to improve their skills and qualifications and, therefore, their prospects of returning to the active work force. In 2002 the Government in view of the expenditure constraints facing it at that time, appointed an independent Estimates Review Committee to consider the Estimates proposals received in the Department of Finance from Departments and Offices.
In its report to Government, that Committee recommended discontinuation of the practice of paying the Back to Education Allowance over the summer period to people who were formerly on the live register. The Government decided to implement that recommendation, commencing summer 2003. The decision applied only to BTEA participants who were in receipt of an unemployment payment prior to participation in the scheme.
It is estimated that in 2002/2003 the total number affected by the decision to discontinue payment for the summer period was 432. The numbers affected decreased to 324 in 2003/2004 and further decreased to 156 in the 2004/2005 academic year. The number of cases affected by the decision to discontinue payment of BTEA during the current summer vacation period is not available at present.
In 2004, five people who were participants on the scheme at the time the change was introduced, sought a judicial review. Other participants were subsequently attached to the proceedings, bringing a total of 173 persons. The hearing took place on 7 February 2006 and judgement was delivered on 28 February 2006. The judgment found in favour of one individual but did not find in favour of any of the other people attached to the proceedings. The court decided that restitution was due only in respect of the summer vacation period in 2003 and only in the case of the one individual whose action was successful. My Department is currently making the necessary arrangements in relation to the person concerned.
My Department conducted an expenditure review of the BTEA Scheme under the Expenditure Review Initiative which was published in September 2005. Amongst the recommendations of the review was that the position regarding summer payments be monitored but it did not recommend that the payments should be reinstated. I have no plans to make any changes to the summer arrangements for the BTEA Scheme at this time.
55 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the details of the new mortgage support plan being considered by his Department; the reasons this new plan is being considered; when he expects the consultation period to be complete; if the scheme will be directed specifically towards those currently priced out of the property market; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22991/06]
82 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his proposals in regard to co-operation with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in the matter of local authority or social housing having particular regard to his recent pronouncements and those of his predecessor and the increasing numbers on local authority housing waiting lists who have to rely on rent support in private rented accommodation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23108/06]
83 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if the responsibility regarding the provision of rent allowance will be transferred to local authorities; the timescale he envisages for same to happen; and if further resources will be allocated to local authorities. [23021/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 55, 82 and 83 together.
Under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare Division of the Health Service Executive, a weekly or monthly rent supplement is available to assist eligible people who are unable to meet their immediate accommodation needs through their own resources.
In recent years, a significant number of people have come to rely on rent supplements for extended periods, including people on local authority housing waiting lists. In response to this situation, the Government has introduced new rental assistance arrangements giving local authorities specific responsibility for meeting the longer-term housing needs of people receiving rent supplement for 18 months or more, on a phased implementation basis. When fully operational, local authorities will meet the housing needs of these individuals through a range of approaches including the traditional range of social housing options, the voluntary housing sector and, in particular, the new rental accommodation scheme.
The Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government has indicated that, at the beginning of June 2006, over 1,200 tenants have been accommodated under the Rental Accommodation Scheme, with a further 770 accommodated in local authority housing. This is the first step towards having the new arrangements fully operational nationwide by September 2008. These arrangements are intended to be a long-term housing option for the people concerned.
In order to finance this initiative €19 million was transferred from my Department's Vote to the Environment, Heritage and Local Government Vote in 2005 and a further €19 million has been transferred for 2006. Similar arrangements will apply in successive years as the new arrangements are fully implemented.
The new rental assistance arrangements provide an imaginative additional approach in supporting people with longer-term housing needs. By definition, people on rent supplement for extended durations have a long-term housing need that they cannot otherwise meet, and many of them are on local authority housing lists. The new scheme, particularly the rental accommodation component, will reduce housing waiting lists by providing a useful additional mechanism for providing social housing, alongside more traditional social housing construction programmes and the expansion of the voluntary housing sector.
At the end of 2005, 60,176 households were in receipt of assistance under the rent supplement scheme. Over half of these, almost 33,000 tenants, have been on the scheme for 18 months or more. My Department and the Health Service Executive are actively assisting the local authorities and the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in implementing the new arrangements. While the progress in terms of tenants transferring has been somewhat slow initially, I am satisfied that the long standing difficulties faced by long-term private sector tenants are being tackled and all of the relevant agencies are co-operating actively to make the new system work successfully.
In recent weeks I have mentioned the concept of some form of housing supplement as a possible alternative to rent supplementation. I am conscious that the rent supplement scheme has become a form of social housing in its own right and for this reason, I am anxious that all avenues are explored to provide financial support for any people on long-term rent supplementation who may be in a position to purchase their own home. In this regard my Department and the Department of Environment Heritage and Local Government, are together overseeing a study which will examine possible approaches to housing. I have asked that the study be undertaken as a matter of urgency and I expect to have a report in the Autumn.
56 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans for reviewing the habitual residency condition; and if his attention has been drawn to the concerns raised by some agencies who view the conditions as too restrictive in areas such as homelessness services. [22999/06]
100 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when the review of the habitual residence condition will be finished; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23098/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 56 and 100 together.
The requirement to be habitually resident in Ireland was introduced as a qualifying condition for certain social assistance schemes and child benefit with effect from 1st May 2004. The basis for the restriction contained in the rules is the applicant's habitual residence. The effect is that a person whose habitual residence is elsewhere is not paid certain social welfare payments on arrival in Ireland. The question of what is a person's "habitual residence" is decided in accordance with European Court of Justice case law, which sets out the grounds for assessing individual claims.
Each case received for a determination on the habitual residence condition is dealt with in its own right and a decision is based on application of guidelines to the particular individual circumstances of each case. Any applicant who disagrees with the decision of a Deciding Officer has the right to appeal to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
The operation of the habitual residence condition has been monitored constantly by my Department since its introduction. A comprehensive review of the operation of the condition is currently being complied with a view to:
—assessing its impact on different categories of persons claiming Social Assistance/ Child Benefit and Supplementary Welfare Allowance payments;
—assessing the current organisational arrangements in the Department for administering the condition and the service provided to customers;
—identifying opportunities for improvements to the administration of the scheme, including those aspects involving other Departments;
—examining all aspects of the decision making process; and
—identifying emerging policy issues and considering how these should be addressed.
The review is expected to be completed during the summer. Account is being taken of the views received from various groups and organisations which have an interest in the area. My Department and the Department of the Environment are fully aware of the concerns expressed by the Homeless Agency and other organisations concerning the impact of the new condition in relation to access to homeless services and these are being assessed and monitored as part of the review.
57 Mr. Sherlock asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to a report from Mercer Human Resource Consulting that found that Ireland has among the lowest levels of statutory maternity benefits in western Europe; his views on how poorly Ireland’s maternity benefit system compares to other European countries; the efforts he is making to address same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22992/06]
The recently published study referred to reviews the levels and duration of maternity benefits across Europe and shows wide variations. The headline results which state that Ireland has one of the lowest levels of statutory maternity pay in Western Europe, however, warrants closer examination. The study does not take into account the net value of the payment received by the woman during her maternity leave, nor highlight who bears the cost of the benefit payment, nor does it bring out the statutory entitlement to longer, paid absences from employment for maternity purposes.
The study shows that, while women in a number of countries receive a higher rate of maternity benefit than those in Ireland, the payment in Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom is liable to both tax and social insurance contributions which will reduce the sum actually received by the woman. In Germany, Hungary, Italy and Sweden the payment received is liable to either tax or to social insurance contributions. Given the higher levels of tax and social insurance contributions that are generally paid by workers in these countries, the real value of maternity benefit paid to mothers is significantly diminished.
The survey pointed to the large variances in the number of weeks of paid maternity leave. As recently as March of this year, the duration of paid maternity leave was increased to 22 weeks as a result of Budget 2006, with plans in place to increase the period of statutory paid leave by a further 4 weeks in 2007 — bringing the duration of entitlement to maternity benefit to 26 weeks in total. By comparison Hungary provides 24 weeks; France, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain allow 16 weeks leave and Germany provides for 14 weeks maternity leave.
Other differences worth drawing out relate to the mechanisms for delivering the payment and the stability in the payment rate of the period of leave. In this country, the payment of cash benefits during statutory leave is funded from the social insurance fund. In some other countries, such as for example Denmark and the United Kingdom, these costs are transferred to the employer in the first instance, thus reducing the costs to the State. The survey also shows that maternity benefit is paid in a number of countries at a reducing rate over the period of maternity leave. In Ireland, however, the payment rate remains constant during the entire period of 22 weeks, thus ensuring continuity and stability in income over the period.
Maternity benefit has been increased significantly over the past five years in terms of both duration and the amount payable. In 2000, the rate payable was the equivalent of EUR219.41 per week over 14 weeks, or EUR3,071 for the duration. Maternity Benefit is now paid at a rate EUR265.60 over 22 weeks or EUR5,843 for the duration. This represents an increase of 90 per cent over a period wherein average industrial earnings increased by just 67 per cent. Further improvement in the duration of maternity benefit payments are planned for 2007.
Funding for maternity benefit comes from the social insurance fund, which is in turn financed through contributions paid by employers, employees and the self-employed. Social insurance contributions are generally payable by employees here at 4% and by employers at 10.05%, with further provision for reduced rates of contributions where workers are on low incomes. By comparison, employees pay 18.75% and employers 17-20% in Poland and in Spain, employees pay 4.7%, while their employers pay 23.6%, thus significantly increasing the fund available to meet the cost of maternity payments.
In the light of the analysis above, I am satisfied that the rates and duration of maternity benefit in Ireland represent a reasonable response to the income needs of women on maternity leave and can be favourably compared internationally. Further improvements in the maternity benefit scheme will continue to be examined in the context of the wider fiscal and social insurance environment.
58 Mr. Coveney asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the targets his Department has set in relation to the timescale for the processing of claims and of appeals for the respective schemes administered by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23084/06]
My Department has adopted challenging performance targets in relation to the timescale for the processing of claims and these are published in its customer action plan. I will provide the deputy with a tabular statement that sets out those performance targets and the actual performance achieved for the month of April. These targets refer only to new and repeat claims and do not reflect the significant amount of work involved in dealing with changes to current claims e.g. to amend entitlement where a person's circumstances have changed. Specific targets are not set in respect of appeals but the independent Social Welfare Appeals Office has as an objective in processing appeals as quickly and expeditiously as possible.
In 2005 decisions were given in respect of some 2 million new or repeat claims. In addition some 14,000 appeals are dealt with by the Social Welfare Appeals Office on an annual basis. The time taken to process a claim is measured by calculating the elapsed time from the date the claim is made until the date of decision. However, no account is taken of the many factors outside my Department's control which can impinge on the time it takes to make a decision e.g. the supply of relevant information by the customer, employers, other third parties or the provision of medical reports.
The report for the month of April shows that the relevant targets were met or exceeded in 10 out of 27 areas during the month. The year to date performance shows an improvement over 2005 in 14 out of the 27 areas. I should point out that the Easter holiday period affected the performance figures for the month of April.
My Department is committed to ensuring that applications are processed and that decisions on entitlement are issued as expeditiously as possible having regard to the eligibility conditions that apply. These conditions vary from scheme to scheme and may include establishment of a customer's social insurance record, the provision of medical evidence, verification of identity, satisfying residency conditions and an assessment of means where appropriate.
In the past few years my Department has coped with increasing demands arising from significant changes to the social welfare code and in the numbers of persons accessing the system. While these factors have impinged on the ability to achieve the targets set, continuous efforts are made to improve the turnaround times for processing claims. Against a background of increased workloads and scheme complexities, my Department undertook a number of initiatives designed to improve customer service. The most significant of these is its service delivery modernisation (SDM) project which was recently put in place for retirement and contributory old age pension schemes. The project involves radical business, organisational and IT changes to the way these pension schemes are administered. A number of manual procedures and calculations have been automated so as to improve timeliness, accuracy and efficiency. The IT system will also have the facility to automatically generate and issue communications to the customer thus providing an improved level of information. Business procedures are being revised and the organisation of work is being restructured to maximise the benefits of the new IT System.
My Department is also developing enhanced management reporting systems as part of its Management Information Framework project. These reporting systems will provide detailed management information that will facilitate improved resource allocation and thus a better response to customer needs.
Apart from these developments, there is continued emphasis on providing staff with the necessary training and development so as to ensure they have the required knowledge and skills to carry out their work. I am conscious of the need to provide a quality service to our customers and, with my officials, I am working towards ensuring that my Department continues to deliver a first class service.
59 Mr. McGinley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of meetings his Department has held with FÁS in the last year in relation to lone parents and encouraging them into the workplace; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23107/06]
Senior officials from my Department meet with FÁS on a regular basis to discuss policy and operational issues arising in the management of the National Employment Action Plan. They have met with their counterparts in FÁS in that context on eight occasions in the past year. Discussions took place at recent meetings on the Government discussion paper "Supporting Lone Parents" and proposed activation and support measures in this area.
In addition regional and local meetings take place between officials from my Department and their regional and local counterparts in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between my Department and FÁS. Issues concerning Lone Parents were also discussed at these meetings.
Furthermore, FÁS was represented at the consultation forum on lone parents which I held with representative groups and State Agencies in Farmleigh on 27 April 2006 following the publication of the Government Discussion Paper. I am aware that FÁS was also represented at a number of meetings of the Working Group set up under the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion to progress the work in this area.
A review of the National Employment Action Plan was completed in November 2005 by Indecon International Consultants for my Department, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and FÁS. One of the recommendations is that the NEAP continue as an effective labour market measure and that consideration be given to extending it to other groups such as lone parents. The recommendations of the Indecon Report are under consideration by my Department and FÁS at present.
60 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will be pursuing the issue of extended preschool provision with the Minister with responsibility for Children, in view of the strong emphasis on early childhood care and education recommended by the Combat Poverty Agency in its recent report Day in Day Out Understanding the Dynamics of Child Poverty. [23003/06]
118 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has received a copy of the eight-year study Day In, Day Out Understanding the Dynamics of Child Poverty by the Combat Poverty Agency and the ESRI; if he will use the study’s findings to inform key policy initiatives in his Department; the action he intends to take on the study’s conclusions; the efforts he is currently making to address child poverty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22984/06]
128 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if, in view of the importance of childcare as an element of tackling poverty, disadvantage and social exclusion, he has had meetings with the Minister with responsibility for Children in relation to childcare provision; and the way in which it has been proposed to make high quality and affordable childcare universally available. [23018/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 60, 118 and 128 together.
I recently launched the Combat Poverty Agency study on the dynamics of child poverty. The study's key findings are that children tend to move in and out of poverty and that child poverty, and its duration, are affected by a wide range of factors, including the employment, education and health status of parents, and by the number and age of children in the household. The report accordingly recommends that the policy response to child poverty should be multi-dimensional in nature, focusing on income supports, combined with measures that support employment, education and accessibility of services such as childcare and health.
This Government does have a strategic process in place for combating poverty, including child poverty, in the form of the National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion (NAP/inclusion) and the National Children's Strategy. "Ending Child Poverty" was also one of ten special initiatives under the social partnership agreement, Sustaining Progress. While these elements remain under active progression, I fully expect that the successor to Sustaining Progress and the next NAP/inclusion 2006-2008 will add further impetus to the process. The Agency's latest report will contribute to policy development in this area.
It is estimated that some 65,000 children remain in consistent poverty, and moving these children out of poverty remains my priority. I hope in this regard to build on the good progress we have made so far. Some 100,000 children have been lifted out of deprivation inside the last decade as a result of targeted measures and supports. The most significant measure my own Department has taken in recent years to support families with children has been the very substantial real increases in child benefit rates. Between 1997 and 2006, the rate of child benefit rose from EUR38.09 per month for the first two children and EUR49.52 for each child thereafter to EUR150.00 per month for each of the first two children and to EUR185.00 per month for the third and each subsequent child. Child benefit is paid to over half a million families in respect of approximately 1.1 million children at a cost in 2006 of more than EUR2 billion.
Child dependent allowances are also paid each week in respect of some 349,000 children. The National Economic and Social Council (NESC) has been examining how these allowances could be incorporated into a new second tier of financial supports, in addition to child benefit and other entitlements, aimed specifically at helping those children most in need. I expect to shortly receive specific proposals from the Council in this regard.
I have also made substantial improvements to the family income supplement which assists families at work on low pay. Assessment of entitlement to payment is now on the basis of net rather than gross income, while increases in the income limits have made it easier for lower-income households to qualify under the scheme. My Department also undertook a very successful nationwide awareness campaign last March to promote and encourage take up of the scheme.
Additional to the above improvements, Budget 2006 contained a range of measures aimed at families with children, which resulted in part from the work of an inter-departmental working group on early child care and education, chaired by the National Children's Office. More than 350,000 children under 6 years of age, in 250,000 families, will qualify for the new annual EUR1,000 early childcare supplement which will be paid on an agency basis by my Department. The cost of the supplement will be approximately EUR360 million in a full year.
Targeted early childhood education provision is a key element of the School Support Programme (SSP), under the new action plan for educational inclusion DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools), which provides for a standardised system for identifying levels of disadvantage. The objective in relation to early childhood education is to concentrate actions initially on those children aged from three up to school enrolment, who will subsequently attend the 180 urban/town primary schools serving the most disadvantaged communities. The Department of Education and Science is working in partnership with my department and other departments and agencies to complement and add value to existing childcare programmes in disadvantaged communities, with a view to ensuring that the overall care and education needs of the children concerned are met in an integrated manner.
One of the key tasks in the "Ending Child Poverty" initiative under Sustaining Progress was to address obstacles to employment for lone parents, whose children are among those most at risk of poverty. Arising from work done in this area by the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion and a working group chaired by my Department, I launched in March of this year a major Government discussion paper, "Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents". The report puts forward radical proposals for reform of the income support system for all parents on a low income. It proposes an expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities; the extension of the National Employment Action Plan; focused provision of childcare; improved information services and the introduction of a new Parental Allowance for low income families with young children. These proposals are currently the subject of an extensive consultation process and I expect to bring proposals for legislation in the course of this year. Preparation of an implementation plan regarding the non-income recommendations of the discussion paper is in progress.
The establishment of the Office of the Minister for Children under the Minister for Children represents a major re-organisation of policy and services for children and brings together the areas of child welfare and protection, childcare, youth justice, early childhood care and education and responsibility for the National Children's Strategy. This structure will facilitate the development of a strategic and co-ordinated approach to children's policy and the delivery of services, both at national and local level.
I am confident that, through the targeted measures already being taken by this Government, and the initiatives being planned, a decisive and lasting impact will be made in the eradication of child poverty.
61 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the plans he has to amend the back to work allowance; the changes to same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23105/06]
106 Mr. English asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people availing of the very long term unemployed programme; the numbers participating in the programme each year respectively since the year 2000; the cost of the scheme for same; if he has conducted any reviews of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23093/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 61 and 106 together.
The Back to Work Allowance Scheme is part of my Department's programme of initiatives designed to assist long term unemployed people, lone parents, people with disabilities and other social welfare recipients to return to the active labour force. There are two strands to the scheme, the Back to Work Enterprise Allowance for the self-employed and the Back to Work Allowance for employees. The allowance was introduced in September 1993 when long term unemployment stood at 8.9%. In its early years the scheme proved very effective in helping people who had been long-term unemployed to return to the labour force.
The scheme reached its peak in October 2000, when there were 39,343 participants, compared to 8,659 at the end of last month. The lower numbers on the scheme now reflect our success in reducing long-term unemployment to historically low levels.
An independent evaluation of the BTW programme was conducted on behalf of my Department by Indecon International Economic Consultants in 2000. In recognition of the difficulties being experienced by some people returning to the labour force after 3 or 5 years of attachment to the live register, the qualifying period for access to both the employment and self-employment strands of Back to Work was reduced to 2 years with effect from March 2006. Also with effect from March 2006 periods spent on Supplementary Welfare Allowance or in the Direct Provision System count towards the qualifying period for Back to Work Allowance.
My Department will monitor the effect of these changes on the take up of the scheme. In addition the scheme will be monitored to ensure its relevance to current labour market conditions and to ensure that it continues to assist those furthest from the labour market to gain a foothold into sustainable employment or self-employment. In the meantime, I have no plans to make further changes to the scheme at this time.
Details of the numbers of participants and of expenditure on the scheme in the period 2000 to 2005 are set out in the table.
|
Year |
Recipients of Back to Work Programme |
Expenditure on Scheme |
|
€m |
||
|
2000 |
39,343 |
167.8 |
|
2001 |
32,191 |
157.6 |
|
2002 |
24,986 |
129.1 |
|
2003 |
17,069 |
97.4 |
|
2004 |
11,566 |
65.7 |
|
2005 |
8,943 |
53.6 |
62 Mr. English asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on allowing participants of the part-time job incentive scheme to retain secondary benefits; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23092/06]
The part-time job incentive is a weekly in-work income supplement which provides an allowance for people who are in receipt of long-term unemployment assistance and employed on a part-time basis for up to 24 hours per week, provided they continue to make efforts to find full-time work. The allowance is not taxable or subject to PRSI. There is no income limit to continued receipt of the allowance. At present, there are 239 recipients countrywide.
The low take up of this allowance is primarily due to the introduction and improvements in alternative, more favourable employment support measures over the years, in particular the back to work programme and the family income supplement. For instance, if the employment is likely to develop into a lasting job for at least 20 hours per week, the back to work scheme is a better option than the part-time job incentive, as it enables the recipient to keep a substantial part of the unemployment payment, tapered over three years. Also, as the back to work programme is a time-limited transitional payment, arrangements are in place for the retention of secondary benefits, subject to certain income limits.
A further alternative to the part-time job incentive is the family income supplement, where low-income employees with children who work more than 19 hours per week or 38 hours per fortnight receive an in-work income support. This is currently paid to 18,647 recipients at an average weekly payment of EUR102.32.
Retention of secondary benefits applies for a limited period in specified circumstances, such as where a qualified person returns to full-time work after twelve months unemployed, or while participating in certain educational or training programmes. There is no provision for such an arrangement where a person is in receipt of an ongoing in-work income support such as the part-time job allowance or the family income supplement.
I have no plans at present to introduce any change in these arrangements. Any such change would have to be considered in a budgetary context and in the context of competing priorities.
63 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if, in view of the difficulties experienced by grandparents looking after their addict son or daughter’s children, he will review the access criteria for these grandparents in relation to the orphans allowance and increase same to be in line with the foster allowance. [23026/06]
115 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the difficulty grandparents looking after the children of their addict sons or daughters have especially regarding the area of abandonment; and if he proposes to review the criteria and the amount paid by the orphan’s allowance. [23027/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 63 and 115 together.
The primary objective of the orphan's payments administered by my Department is to provide income support in respect of children whose parents are deceased or who are unable and have failed to provide for them. The definition of an orphan for the purpose of the allowance was extended in 1995 specifically to include children where the parents are still alive but have abandoned or refused or failed to provide for them. This was seen as a necessary response to changes in family and social circumstances.
Current figures indicate that there are approximately 1000 recipients of the orphan's contributory allowance and a further 600 recipients of the orphan's non-contributory pension. Grandparents can and do claim for their children in the circumstances outlined by the Deputy. Indeed, informal statistics compiled by officials in my Department suggest that grandparents may make up between 40 and 50% of all claimants in respect of these schemes. My Department's orphans' payments provide a rate of payment of €138 per week. This is a substantially higher rate compared with other payments made by my Department in respect of children.
Foster carers, on the other hand, operate within a very specific framework and the foster care allowance is intended, not only to provide income support, but to recompense foster carers for the expense incurred in relation to looking after a child who would otherwise be in institutional care. Foster carers are therefore subject to rigorous scrutiny and ongoing monitoring by the health boards, and the children in their care are subject to a care plan.
There are no plans to review either the eligibility criteria in relation to the schemes, or standardise the rates of payment under these schemes.
64 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has intentions of making the tapered withdrawal of rent supplement available to all claimants. [23007/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which is administered on my behalf by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive, provides for the payment of a rent supplement to assist eligible people who are unable to provide for their immediate accommodation needs from their own resources and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source.
My Department is very conscious of the need to facilitate persons in receipt of social welfare payments to take up employment and other progression opportunities. There are currently two separate types of tapering arrangements in place to ensure that rent supplement is structured to support this objective. The first of these tapers the amount of rent supplement by reference to the household's overall income. This applies under the standard means test, which is available to all persons in part-time employment including people on approved employment schemes. The amount of rent supplement payable is reduced as the person's earnings increase.
The other tapering arrangement tapers the amount of rent supplement over time rather than by reference to income. This benefits people participating on certain approved employment schemes or those returning to full-time employment after a period of twelve months unemployment. Under this arrangement, the amount of rent supplement payable is reduced out over a four year period, subject to certain conditions.
In cases where a person qualifies for both tapering arrangements, they can take up the arrangement that is most beneficial to them. Increasingly, this is the taper based on income which applies under the standard rules of the rent supplement scheme. Under those rules, rent or mortgage interest supplements are calculated to ensure that an eligible person, after the payment of rent or mortgage interest, has an income equal to the rate of supplementary welfare allowance appropriate to his or her family circumstances, less a minimum contribution of EUR13 which each recipient is required to pay from his or her own resources.
Where a person avails of an employment opportunity and the employment is less than 30 hours per week, up to EUR60 per week is disregarded and 50% of additional income between EUR60 and EUR90 per week is also disregarded in the means test thus ensuring a tapered withdrawal of assistance as a person's earnings increase. In addition, any amount of family income supplement payable is disregarded in the standard means test, ensuring that a person is better off as a result of taking up such an opportunity. For those participating in approved employment schemes, any lunch or travel allowances that are paid may also be disregarded. In addition, certain training courses now provide a childcare allowance to participants, Budget 2006 provided that these childcare allowances are to be treated in the same manner as a lunch or travel allowance and disregarded.
For those participating on certain approved employment schemes or to those returning to full-time employment after a period of twelve months unemployment they may retain a proportion of their rent supplement payment on a tapered basis over a four year period subject to a household income limit of EUR317.43 per week. Under these arrangements 75% of the supplement is retained in year one, 50% in year two with 25% retained in years three and four. Significant improvements have been made to the means test subsequently.
Back to work allowance and family income supplement, in cases where one or both of these are in payment, are disregarded in the assessment of the EUR317.43 weekly income limit. PRSI and reasonable travelling expenses are also disregarded in the means test. In effect this means that people who commence employment through a back to work scheme, following a period of unemployment, can have a weekly household income significantly in excess of the EUR317.43 limit and still qualify to retain 75% of their rent or mortgage interest supplement.
Overall I consider that the current tapered withdrawal arrangements for the rent supplement ensure that people have a financial incentive to take up both training and employment opportunities, but I will continue to keep the issue under review. I would also mention that these arrangements are being considered further in the context of a policy review of the supplementary welfare allowance scheme which is due to be completed shortly.
65 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on recent findings of the Comptroller and Auditor General in relation to rent supplement overpayments and the need to develop methods to identify the extent of fraudulent or unwarranted recourse to rent supplements. [22998/06]
74 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to concerns expressed by the Comptroller and Auditor General regarding the rapid rise in the cost of rent supplement; his views on the replacement of the rent supplement with a new housing benefit scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22981/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 65 and 74 together.
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. While my Department has responsibility for devising an overall control strategy for the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, the development, implementation and co-ordination of control measures is the responsibility of the Health Service Executive.
All Community Welfare Officers and Superintendent Community Welfare Officers are involved in control of SWA payments on a daily basis, making control work an integral part of service delivery. Control work commences when a person makes an application and is maintained during the life of the claim by way of reviews of entitlement, random checks and cross checks of claims to ensure that the client continues to be entitled to the payment. In addition, targeted control work is also carried out by the Health Service Executive.
The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General acknowledges that a significant amount of control work is undertaken and that overpayments of rent supplement are being detected. The Comptroller and Auditor General is however critical of the fact that it is not clear how effective the control work is or if the control activity is targeted in the areas of greatest risk. I accept those points.
In this regard my Department together with the Community Welfare Service of the HSE is in the process of completing a fraud and error survey on rent supplement. My Department also intends undertaking a control risk assessment for the SWA scheme including rent supplement. This will provide an opportunity to identify those aspects of the scheme where stricter levels of control might be required. The comments of the C&AG have been made known to the Executive and my Department will be ensuring that controls remains a priority in ensuring that the scheme meets it correct target group.
As Deputies are aware the Government decided that income support and maintenance schemes administered by the Community Welfare Service division of the Health Service Executive should be transferred to my Department. Work has commenced in implementing this decision and I believe the move will provide a further opportunity to address many of the points raised in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report including the issues of control and overall administration.
I am aware of the increases in rent supplement recipients and expenditure as identified in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report. During the period 2000 to 2005, recipient numbers rose from 42,700 to just over 60,000 with expenditure rising from EUR151m to EUR369m. Approximately one third of the overall increase in spending on rent supplements can be explained by increases in the number of recipients, while the remaining two-thirds is attributed to increases in the average rent supplement payment. The increase in the average rent supplement payment is itself attributable to a number of factors, including family size, location and rent level.
The rent supplement scheme was not designed to provide for an individual's long-term accommodation needs. However, in recent years, a significant number of people have come to rely on rent supplements for extended periods, including people on local authority housing waiting lists. In response to this situation, the Government has introduced new rental assistance arrangements giving local authorities specific responsibility for meeting the longer-term housing needs of people receiving rent supplement for 18 months or more, on a phased implementation basis.
When fully operational, local authorities will meet the housing needs of these individuals through a range of approaches including the traditional range of social housing options, the voluntary housing sector and, in particular, a new public/private partnership type rental accommodation scheme. This approach provides a better outcome for the tenants in question and it will also provide better value for money for the taxpayer.
I do not propose to replace the rent supplement scheme with a new housing benefit scheme and the Government is not considering any such proposal. Our priority is to provide housing for those who need it, not to provide an income supplement in lieu of housing. The reform of the rent supplement scheme, the development of the local authority rental accommodation scheme and the very considerable investment in a wide range of social and affordable housing options taken together represent, in my view, a better use of resources than a housing benefit scheme.
66 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the data on child poverty here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23104/06]
84 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will provide an estimate of the number of children here who currently live in a state of poverty; the efforts he is making to address the fact that 65,000 children here live in a state of consistent poverty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22985/06]
93 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress to date on the eradication of consistent poverty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23095/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 66, 84 and 93 together.
The EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), which commenced in Ireland in 2003, is conducted annually by the Central Statistics Office and collects information on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. The results of the most recent survey, announced in December 2005, show continuing positive trends in relation to poverty and social exclusion, and the impact being made by the greatly increased resources now devoted to social welfare and other social services.
Results from the first two years of EU-SILC show that there has been a slight decrease in the percentage of persons ‘at risk of poverty', whose income falls below the 60 per cent median income threshold, from 19.7 per cent in 2003 to 19.4 per cent in 2004. These figures are beginning to reflect the impact of the continuing high level of resources being devoted to supporting those at risk of poverty and suggest that the numbers in that category may have peaked and are beginning to decline.
It should be noted that those below the 60 per cent of median income threshold are categorised as being ‘at risk of poverty', but many may not actually be in poverty, as generally understood. That depends on other factors such as the extent to which their income is below the threshold, the length of time they have been living on a low income, the degree to which their assets will have run down while on a low income, and the other resources they have at their disposal. Those experiencing poverty as generally understood are said to be in consistent poverty and the numbers in that category are also identified by EU-SILC.
The most recent EU-SILC survey also found that there has been a significant reduction in the consistent poverty rate. This is calculated by identifying from among those in the ‘at risk of poverty' category persons who are also deprived of basic goods and services regarded as essential for living in Ireland today. This percentage reduced from 8.8 per cent in 2003 to 6.8 per cent in2004.
With regard to data on child poverty, the EU-SILC survey reported that in 2004 9.5 per cent of persons under the age of 15 were in consistent poverty, a reduction from the 2003 figure of 12.2 per cent. There was a slight rise in the numbers of persons under the age of 15 at risk of poverty from 21.0 per cent in 2003 to 21.2 per cent in 2004. Some 100,000 children have been lifted out of deprivation in the last decade as a result of targeted measures and supports. It is estimated that some 65,000 children remain in consistent poverty and moving these children out of poverty remains my priority.
It may also be important to note trends over a longer period which have caused some confusion. When making comparisons with previous trends, it is necessary to refer to EU-SILC's predecessor, the Living in Ireland Survey (LIIS), which was conducted by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) between 1994 and 2001. While the ‘at risk of poverty' rates between the two surveys are broadly comparable this is not the case with the consistent poverty measure. The CSO and the ESRI attributed the increase recorded in consistent poverty between 2001 and 2003 to methodological differences between the EU-SILC and LIIS surveys. Accordingly, it was not possible to draw any conclusions on how consistent poverty actually changed in this period. There is no evidence that the actual level of consistent poverty would have increased during these years, as there were no policy changes that would have reversed the earlier downward trends. On the contrary, significant improvements in social welfare rates and in other services had been made in the intervening period and the EU-SILC results for 2004 now suggest that the downward trend recorded in the LIIS continues.
The main indicators show that significant progress had been made in the last decade in tackling poverty and specifically child poverty. Much of child poverty is related to the position of the households where children live. The major reduction in unemployment and, in particular, long term unemployment, the significant increases in employment participation resulting in the growth in two income households and the huge improvements in real terms in social welfare payments and related services have greatly helped to improve the position not only of adults but also of their children.
The National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion (NAP/inclusion) is a key instrument in that regard. A review of implementation of the plan, undertaken in June 2005, found that some 51 of its 58 targets and commitments had either been met or were in the process of being met. A new plan which will significantly build on the progress being made, covering the two year period from 2006 to 2008, is currently being prepared.
The surveys and indicators also show that the families with children most at risk of poverty are large families and those headed by lone parents. Many of these families have not been able to avail of the greatly increased employment opportunities and the related higher incomes that accrue from employment. A range of reforms and increased welfare supports, child-centered services and child care are addressing these problems. These include: radical reforms of the schemes for lone parents and the qualified adults of social welfare beneficiaries, payment of the €1,000 a year early childcare supplement for all children under 6 years, increases in welfare supports and entitlements in real terms; and the creation of additional childcare places.
These measures are part of a wider programme being prepared to support children to apply over the next 10 years, which is among the most ambitious ever undertaken in the State. A key priority for the Government is to make a decisive impact on child poverty by ensuring that the position of children who are vulnerable to poverty receives special support under this programme consistent with their needs.
67 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on increasing the living alone allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22951/06]
94 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people currently in receipt of the living alone allowance each week; the weekly total cost of this payment; the estimated weekly cost of increasing this payment to at least €10; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22952/06]
98 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when the living alone allowance was first introduced and its rate of payment at the time; when this payment was increased, over the years giving the amount and effective date of each increase; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22953/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 67, 94 and 98 together.
The living alone allowance or living alone increase as it is now known, is an additional payment of EUR7.70 per week made to people aged 66 years or over who are in receipt of certain social welfare payments and who are living alone. It is also available to people under 66 years of age who are living alone and who receive payments under one of a number of invalidity type schemes.
The increase is intended as a contribution towards the additional costs people face when they live alone. It was introduced in 1977 at the rate of £1.00 (EUR1.27) per week. The amount and effective date of each increase to the payment is given in the table.
The latest figures available show that there were 150,551 people in receipt of the living alone increase at end March 2006, at a cost of about EUR1.16 million per week. The cost of increasing the living alone increase to EUR10 per week is estimated at approximately EUR346,300 per week or EUR18.4 million per annum.
The living alone increase is a targeted measure aimed at a particular group of pensioners. However, the policy in relation to support for pensioners has been, for many years, to give priority to increasing the personal rates of pension rather than focusing on payments such as the living alone increase. This approach ensures that resources are used to improve the position of all pensioners. The position will be kept under review in the context of future budgets.
|
Date |
Amount (Punts) |
Euro Equivalent |
|
£ |
€ |
|
|
01/04/1977 |
1.00 |
1.27 |
|
07/04/1978 |
1.10 |
1.40 |
|
06/04/1979 |
1.30 |
1.65 |
|
04/04/1980 |
1.65 |
2.10 |
|
03/04/1981 |
2.05 |
2.60 |
|
02/10/1981 |
2.15 |
2.73 |
|
02/04/1982 |
2.70 |
3.43 |
|
01/07/1983 |
3.00 |
3.81 |
|
06/07/1984 |
3.20 |
4.06 |
|
12/07/1985 |
3.40 |
4.32 |
|
18/07/1986 |
3.55 |
4.51 |
|
24/07/1987 |
3.70 |
4.70 |
|
29/07/1988 |
3.80 |
4.83 |
|
28/07/1989 |
3.90 |
4.95 |
|
27/07/1990 |
4.10 |
5.21 |
|
26/07/1991 |
4.30 |
5.46 |
|
31/07/1992 |
4.50 |
5.71 |
|
30/07/1993 |
4.70 |
5.97 |
|
29/07/1994 |
4.80 |
6.09 |
|
16/06/1995 |
4.90 |
6.22 |
|
14/06/1996 |
6.00 |
7.62 |
|
04/01/2002 |
6.06 |
7.70* |
* Resulted from a general rounding up of rates consequent on the introduction of the Euro.
68 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress which has been made in realising an all-Ireland free travel scheme. [23020/06]
77 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress which has been made in relation to putting in place an all-Ireland free travel scheme for pensioners resident in all parts of this island. [23019/06]
319 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position in relation to the introduction of an all-Ireland free travel scheme; the discussions he has had on the issue; and if he will make a statement on when such a scheme may be implemented. [23840/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 68, 77 and 319 together.
The Programme for Government contains a commitment to a scheme of all-Ireland free travel for pensioners resident in all parts of the island of Ireland. The scheme will enable pensioners resident here to travel free of charge on all bus and rail services in Northern Ireland. Likewise, pensioners in Northern Ireland will travel free of charge on services in this State.
In July 1995, my Department introduced the cross border free travel scheme. This scheme extended free travel entitlement so that free travel pass holders resident in Ireland could undertake a cross-border journey from a point of departure in one jurisdiction to a destination in the other jurisdiction free of charge. The introduction of an all-Ireland free travel scheme would further extend the existing arrangements by allowing pass holders to take onward journeys free of charge to them.
My Department covers the full cost of cross-border journeys made by Department of Social and Family Affairs pass holders. It also covers the cost of the southern element of cross-border journeys undertaken by Northern Ireland pass holders. Under its own concessionary fares scheme, the Department for Regional Development for Northern Ireland covers the cost of the northern element of cross-border bus and rail journeys made by Northern Ireland pass holders.
Some 220,000 cross-border journeys are undertaken each year at a total cost of EUR3.3m; my Department pays EUR2.9m and the remaining €0.4m is covered by the Department for Regional Development for Northern Ireland.
Intensive discussions in relation to the introduction of the proposed all-Ireland free travel scheme have taken place between officials from my Department and their counterparts in the Department for Regional Development for Northern Ireland. Discussions have also been held at ministerial level, and the matter was raised by the Taoiseach with the Prime Minister. I will continue to focus on delivering a suitable scheme at the earliest possible date.
69 Mr. McGinley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the efforts he has made to date in ensuring that workers in the construction industry receive their pension entitlements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23106/06]
The Construction Federation Operatives Pensions Scheme operates as a Registered Employment Agreement under the Industrial Relations Acts. There is a statutory obligation on employers to register eligible employees in the scheme and to pay the necessary contributions.
Compliance with the terms of the scheme is enforced through the Construction Industry Monitoring Agency, The Labour Court and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. The Pensions Board also has a role in relation to the scheme in so far as compliance with the various aspects of the Pensions Act is concerned. However, the main difficulties with the scheme relate to failure to register employees and/or to deduct contributions to the scheme and these issues are a matter for the Construction Industry Monitoring Agency, The Labour Court and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
Given the ongoing controversy in relation to the scheme and compliance with its terms, the Pensions Board facilitated a report on the scheme in conjunction with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. The report was undertaken by Mercer Human Resource Consulting and it found that 80% of the estimated 80,000 eligible employees in the industry are covered by the scheme. However, the report does highlight the fact that an estimated 70,000 operatives are classed as self-employed and are therefore not eligible to join the scheme. The consultants are of the view that many of these workers are not genuinely self-employed.
Mercer have made a range of recommendations designed to improve compliance with the scheme involving the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment, the Department of Finance, the Revenue Commissioners and my Department. Copies of the report were provided to the relevant Ministers.
In relation to my own Department, the report has recommended that consideration be given to using the PRSI system as a means of enforcing the scheme and collecting contributions. This gives rise to a number of major issues, not least of which is the extent to which the Department should be directly involved in the administration of, what is, a private pension scheme. Major legislative change would be required and the accounting and operational arrangements of the PRSI system would need to be adapted to meet the very different needs and requirements of a funded pension system. The changes in relation to the scheme announced recently, which will see the creation of individual pension accounts for workers, would make this even more difficult.
Putting the Construction Industry Monitoring Agency on a statutory footing and dealing with issues in relation to self-employment in the industry, as also proposed in the Mercer report, are in my view the ways forward. The former is a matter for my colleague the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment and I have contacted him to seek his views on the prospects for progress in this area.
In the meantime, I have asked my Department to see to what extent it can assist generally, having regard to the programme of inspections of employers' records. My Department is planning to carry out 7,000 employer inspections in the current year, and in this context, a greater emphasis will be placed on the construction sector.
With regard to self-employment, designations are, in the first instance, generally made by the Revenue Commissioners. However, it is open at any time to an individual to ask for a determination on his or her employment status for social insurance purposes from my Department.
Finally, following a meeting I had with trade unions representing construction workers, I was in touch with my colleague, the Minister for Finance, in relation to ensuring that contractors being awarded public sector contracts are complying with their obligations under the Construction Federation Operatives Pensions Scheme. This issue is currently under consideration.
70 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has received the special report from his officials regarding the issue of maintenance referred to in the Joint Committee on Social and Family Affairs debate on the lone parent proposals on 30 June 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23076/06]
Applicants for one-parent family payment are required to make efforts to seek adequate maintenance from their former spouses, or, in the case of unmarried applicants, the other parent of their child, and must satisfy the Department that they have made reasonable attempts to obtain such maintenance. Similarly, under the Liability to Maintain the Family provisions of the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act 2005, absent parents have a responsibility to support their children and this is pursued by the Department where the absent parent is not making sufficient effort to provide adequate support.
The report referred to by the Deputy which is in essence a preliminary report, is now to hand. This report provides an indicative estimate of the number of liable relatives contributing to the support of their children and recommends the undertaking of a special project by the Maintenance Recovery Unit of my Department in this area in an attempt to better estimate the numbers of liable relatives contributing.
Over the next three months the Maintenance Recovery Unit will examine the circumstances of the liable relatives of all newly awarded one-parent family payment claims and assess the level of contribution, through maintenance payments or other supports, being made in respect of the children. On completion, a report will be compiled outlining the findings and including proposals in relation to how best the Department might interact with the full liable relative population going forward.
At present 2,290 liable relatives are making payments directly to my Department's Maintenance Recovery Unit (MRU) on foot of maintenance determination orders issued by the Unit. There are also 17,798 lone parent customers receiving reduced rate payments and it is estimated that the receipt of maintenance payments is a factor in approximately 9,700 of these cases, based on an analysis of the casework undertaken in the MRU over the past 5 years. In addition, there is a substantial number of cases where absent parents are or have been making some contribution to lone parents either by direct cash contributions or indirectly in the form of meeting the educational or other costs of children, which does not result in a reduction in payment for the lone parent. The project currently underway aims to better quantify the number of such cases and the financial circumstances of the absent parents involved.
71 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of personnel who are receiving farm assist; if there has been an effort in recent times to promote this scheme in view of the serious decline in farm incomes and the difficulties in finding part-time jobs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23028/06]
The farm assist scheme, which introduced special arrangements for farmers on low incomes, was provided for in the Social Welfare Act, 1999 and came into operation with effect from 7 April 1999. There are now 7,609 farm assist customers. The current average weekly payment is EUR 174.07.
The level of take-up is less than had been anticipated when the scheme was first introduced in April 1999. This is due to the significant increase in off-farm employment in recent years and the take up of the Rural Social Scheme which is operated by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and which also specifically targets low-income farmers.
The farm assist scheme has brought about a worthwhile improvement for low income farmers and particularly for those with children and it makes a valuable contribution to supporting those who are at the lower end of the farm income spectrum. To increase awareness of the farm assist scheme, my Department undertook a major publicity campaign in 2002. Almost EUR100,000 was spent on the campaign which consisted of radio and press advertising, including specialist farming publications, and the production of a promotional video on the scheme.
More generally, the network of Social Welfare Offices and Citizen's Information Offices throughout the country provide information to members of the public on the range of schemes and services available, including the farm assist scheme. Information leaflets and applications forms for farm assist are available at these offices. In addition, Social Welfare Inspectors in rural areas promote the scheme when meeting customers in the course of their duties.
72 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the estimated figure as to the number of absent parents who are not paying required levels of child maintenance for their children; the action he intends to take to address this trend; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22989/06]
78 Ms B. Moynihan-Cronin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his proposals to address the low number of absent fathers paying child maintenance; his views on introducing a mechanism to penalise absent fathers who fail to support their children financially; if so, the details of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22986/06]
85 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of claims for one parent family payment for which the maintenance recovery unit has sought to trace liable relatives for each year since 2003 respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23077/06]
119 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of claims for one parent family payment for which maintenance is being paid directly to the claimant from the liable relative; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23078/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 72, 78, 85 and 119 together.
In every case where a one-parent family payment is awarded, the Maintenance Recovery Unit of my Department seeks to trace the other parent in order to ascertain whether he or she is in a financial position to pay maintenance either directly to the recipient of the one parent family payment or to contribute towards the cost of one-parent family payment which is paid to their family. This follow-up activity takes place within 2-3 weeks of the award of payment.
The number of one parent family payment recipients being paid by my Department at the end of April 2006 was 83,248. Included in this figure are 914 payments to widowed persons where maintenance is not an issue. In the period January 2003 to May 2006, the Maintenance Recovery Unit has examined 63,289 cases and issued determination orders to 8,958 liable relatives. During this period total savings arising from the work of this unit have amounted to EUR 56.9 million.
Of the 63,289 cases examined in the period January 2003 to May 2006, some 17,447 lone parents indicated that they were in receipt of maintenance payments from their former spouses, or, in the case of unmarried applicants, the other parent of their child. It is estimated that a further 9,700 lone parents are in receipt of a reduced rate payment by reason of maintenance. A total of 2,290 liable relatives contribute directly to the Department. Taken together these figures indicate that in excess of 40% of liable relatives are contributing to the support of their children.
Over the last number of years a total of 182 cases has been selected for court action. The aim behind this activity is to secure maintenance from non-compliant liable relatives.
In an effort to better estimate the numbers of absent parents not paying maintenance, the Maintenance Recovery Unit of my Department will, over the next 3 months, undertake a special project to examine the circumstances of the liable relatives of all newly awarded one-parent family payment claims and assess the level of contribution, through maintenance payments or through the meeting of educational or other costs, being made in respect of the children. The findings of this project will be used to assess how best the Department might interact with the liable relative population.
73 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the impact the lone parents proposals will have on the limitation rule if enacted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23082/06]
88 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the impact the lone parent proposals will have on the qualified adult allowance if enacted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23081/06]
124 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will provide details of the wide package of reforms of State aid for lone parents that he is currently considering; when he hopes to have this package complete; if he expects same to be in place before the end of 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22987/06]
130 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to criticisms from the chief executive of the One Parent Exchange and Network in an article in a newspaper (details supplied) regarding his new proposals on supports for lone parents; if his attention has been further drawn to the concern that these new proposals will effectively penalise lone parents who work for a living; if he is taking action to address these concerns; if he has met with representatives of the One Parent Exchange and Network to discuss the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22988/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 73, 88, 124 and 130 together.
The major discussion paper, "Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents" which I launched in March this year, addresses the social exclusion and risk of poverty faced by many such families and their children. The report puts forward proposals for reform of the income support system for all parents on a low income. The report proposes the expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities for lone parents, the extension of the National Employment Action Plan to focus on lone parents, focused provision of childcare, improved information services for lone parents and the introduction of a new Parental Allowance for low income families with young children.
The current one-parent family payment provides long term income support, until children are 18 or 22 if in full-time education, to those parenting alone, with no requirement to be available for or seeking employment. Such long term welfare dependency in respect of a person of working age is not considered to be in the best interests of the lone parent, their children or society in general. Numerous reports have indicated that employment is one of the most important routes out of poverty.
Under the proposed parental allowance, it is suggested that an element of conditionality be attached to receipt of the payment. Overall the report considers that payment of parental allowance should cease when the youngest child reaches the end of their 7th year. This being the case, formal activation would commence when the child was age 5. This would give the parent the opportunity and supports required to engage in education or training for three years, before payment of parental allowance would cease.
Activation, as referred to in the proposal, is ‘positive' in nature; it encompasses interview/advice meetings, education and training and providing people with the skills to enable them to achieve financial independence and therefore, a better life for themselves and their children. While conditions are being suggested for receipt of payment, it is proposed that supports will be offered in a structured and systematic manner to the persons concerned. It is in this context that continuing payment would be made conditional on engagement.
I would also stress that the discussion paper acknowledges that the age to which the parental allowance should remain payable is a matter for decision by Government following the consultation process currently underway. I have listened carefully to the comments made by organisations representing lone parents at the recent consultation forum I hosted and have asked them to submit their views and concerns in writing. I will take all of these views into account to arrive at the best possible solution for all.
I have asked the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion to draw up an implementation plan to progress the non-income recommendations of the discussion paper, including those related to childcare, education, training and activation measures and work on this has already commenced in consultation with the Departments and agencies concerned. Issues including the impact of the proposals on the qualified adult allowance, the limitation rule and those lone parents who are already in work will be taken into account in the implementation of the proposals.
As a follow-up to the publication of the discussion paper, I hosted a National Consultative Forum on 27th April 2006. This Forum was attended by social partners, representatives of organisations dealing with lone parents and the unemployed, representatives of Government departments and State agencies who will be responsible for the implementation of the proposals in the discussion paper and members of the Oireachtas.
At the Forum, I heard the views of each organisation on the proposals including their comments on the proposed parental allowance and invited them to make a formal written submission setting out those views. I also met with representatives of the One Parent Exchange Network on 14 June to discuss the proposals. I have also briefed the Oireachtas Committee on Social Affairs and debated the issue in the Seanad.
I will listen closely to the views expressed and will give very serious consideration to them. As soon as I am convinced that we have reached conclusions that are fully workable and equitable, it will be my intention to bring forward proposals for legislation in the course of this year.
75 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans to introduce assistance towards the cost of refuse collection for low income families; the consideration he has given into the research on the subject carried out by the Combat Poverty Agency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23059/06]
I have examined the research carried out by the Combat Poverty Agency on the issue of a waiver system for refuse charges. In 2003 the Combat Poverty Agency published a report entitled "Waste Collection Charges and Low-Income Households". This report identified the privatization of waste collection charges and the abolition of waivers as factors causing indebtedness among some households.
In light of this, a later report, "Implementing a Waiver System: Guidelines for Local Authorities" which was published in October 2005 examined three possible models for the operation of a waiver system: a locally based system; a tax credit system and a social welfare system. Advantages and disadvantages of each model were presented but the report concluded that a locally operated waiver system would offer the most effective delivery model.
I am in agreement with the Combat Poverty Agency in that regard. The setting of waste management charges and the introduction of waivers in respect of waste charges is, as stated by my colleague the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, a matter for each local authority. The introduction of a national social welfare scheme to address the issue would be complex given the wide range of charging regimes and cost structures that exist in respect of waste management throughout the State. Any system put in place to assist people who rely on private domestic waste collection would have to be sensitive to the different local arrangements.
I intend to keep the matter under review and to monitor the experience of welfare customers under various charging systems and cost structures.
76 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding his role in negotiations for a new national partnership agreement; if he anticipates a successful outcome to these negotiations; the particular issues pertaining to his Department that remain outstanding in the partnership negotiations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22995/06]
Social partnership has played an important if not pivotal role in Ireland's dramatic economic and social development since 1987. Through the partnership process, we have helped to ensure that the policies of Government and the efforts of the social partners create the right environment for sustainable economic and social development.
The prosperity secured in partnership has a purpose — it is to improve the quality of life of our people, including those dependent on social welfare. This is best achieved when there is a reasonable consensus about the choices we face as a country.
I welcome the draft Social Partnership agreement ‘Towards 2016', which has put in place the policies and the delivery systems, which will allow us to realise our full potential. Negotiations are still ongoing with the Farming Pillar and are expected to be completed shortly.
The new social partnership agreement will provide a positive framework for addressing the issues of poverty and social exclusion in a comprehensive, focussed and integrated manner. The implementation of the agreement, allied to the achievement of the targets set out in the National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion will ensure that we will make real and tangible progress towards the achievement of a fair and inclusive society.
79 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has received the report from the Pensions Board that he requested regarding mandatory pension options; its main findings; if it is not complete, when he expects to receive a copy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22980/06]
96 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plan to reform Irish pensions; if this new system will include a form of mandatory saving; when he plans to launch and implement this plan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22979/06]
108 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has received a report from the Pensions Board on the issue of mandatory or quasi-mandatory pensions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23089/06]
117 Mr. Coveney asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress which has been made toward the Government target of 70 per cent of those in employment, over 30 years of age having supplementary pension coverage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23085/06]
131 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his Department in conjunction with the Pensions Board have considered the viability of a pension opt-out scheme as was recently proposed in the UK. [23006/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 79, 96, 108, 117 and 131 together.
As the Deputies will be aware, in early 2005 I asked the Pensions Board to bring forward by one year a review of our overall pensions strategy because I considered that, on the basis of the progress being made, there was little prospect of reaching our targets for pensions coverage in any kind of reasonable timescale. Pensions coverage for the key target group, those aged 30 years and over, stood at 58.6% in the 1st quarter of 2005. This coverage rate has moved little in recent years. The Pensions Board completed its work in November 2005 and I published the report in January.
The Board has reaffirmed the various targets recommended in the original National Pensions Policy Initiative which included a retirement income, from all sources, of 50% of pre-retirement income, a social welfare pension equating to 34% of average industrial earnings and a supplementary pensions coverage rate of 70% for those aged over 30 years. The Pensions Board has recommended enhancements to the current voluntary system of supplementary pensions as it considers that it has the potential to deliver significant improvements in coverage.
However, no truly voluntary pensions system has delivered the sort of coverage rates for which we are aiming. I have said on many occasions that if we are to achieve our overall targets we may have to consider a more radical approach. Accordingly, I have asked the Pensions Board to explore in more detail the ideas for a mandatory or quasi-mandatory system it put forward in its report on the National Pensions Review. The ideas explored in the Pensions Review range from a mandatory system built up on the existing private sector system to a greater role in pensions provision for the PRSI system.
As part of the review the Board will examine the UK's proposed Pensions Savings Scheme. This proposal involves employees being automatically enrolled into a pension when they start a new job. They will be able to opt out, but if they do not, they will be obliged to pay in 4% of any earnings between £5,000 and £33,000 a year. This will be matched with 3% from their employer and 1% from the State.
I expect to receive the Board's final report in the coming weeks. The challenge in the months ahead will be to agree on a set of reforms which will deliver on the objective of an adequate income for all in retirement.
80 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the support he has given to the Money Advice and Budgeting Service in view of the concerns expressed by the organisation that they are being swamped with requests for advice; his views on the increasing levels of personal debt among families here; his further views on whether the structures and organisation of MABS require reform to cope with these new circumstances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22993/06]
The Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS) provides assistance to people who are over indebted and need intensive help and advice in coping with debt problems. There are 52 independent companies nation-wide operating the service and support is provided by MABS National Development Limited, a support company for the service. MABS was established on a pilot basis in 1992 and it has now grown to a countrywide service with a budget of EUR 16.41 million.
The programme provides money advice to individuals and families who have problems with debt and who are on low income or in receipt of social welfare payments. It places an emphasis on practical budget-based measures that help people to move permanently from dependence on moneylenders and to access alternative sources of low cost credit, particularly in their local credit union. Many voluntary and statutory bodies such as the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, the Community Welfare Service, credit unions, Citizens' Information Centres, Centres for the Unemployed, the clergy, Garda, and local authorities work closely with the programme.
The Government is keen to get more quality information on the nature and trends of the debt encountered as well as the categories of people using the MABS so as to better inform policy around over-indebtedness and also allow the MABS to be even more responsive to its clients' needs. In this respect I am pleased with the introduction of a new software application which has been developed for the specific use of the Money Advice and Budgeting Service — MABSIS (Money Advice and Budgeting Service Integrated System). That computer system was delivered on time and within budget.
It is a most important facility and, as well as easing the administrative burden on staff, it will provide very useful data around indebtedness which will in turn inform development of policy around money advice and budgeting. Last year alone almost 27,000 people used the service as compared with almost 18,000 some 4 years earlier. The demand on the service can be attributed to the increase in the availability of credit and to the quality of the service provided by the MABS staff. This year I have increased the allocation from my Department to the MABS Service by in excess of twenty percent to assist the MABS in dealing with this increased workload.
In November 2005 I informed the MABS National Advisory Committee that I intended to review the MABS Bill 2002 and invited each of the stakeholders to make submissions to me with a view to producing a more effective structure. I have received a number of submissions which I am now considering in order to provide a suitable framework to ensure that the service remains responsive in the coming years.
I believe the support structure put in place in recent years has been invaluable for management and staff and has been very effective in the areas of Community Education, Social Policy and Communications. I also believe that a national system with delivery at the local level is the direction for the future. The Service at present is highly regarded and respected and it is important that this continues to be the case.
It is my intention to have legislation enacted as early as possible in order to put the service on a sounder footing to continue its extremely important role in assisting people deal with indebtedness.
86 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on changing the dual eligibility rule for people in receipt of the carer’s allowance, for example a person who has been in receipt of the carer’s allowance and then qualifies for the old age pension can only receive one social welfare payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23099/06]
97 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to change the dual eligibility rule for people in receipt of the carer’s allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23097/06]
105 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has re-examined the unanimous proposal put forward by the Joint Committee on Social and Family Affairs that widows and widowers and others on social welfare should get at least half the carers allowance if they are giving care to an elderly or disabled person; his views on whether such a person on a contributory pension would be entitled to retain full time employment outside the home and is therefor making a significant sacrifice that justifies recognition; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23029/06]
121 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans to reform the eligibility for the carers allowance and to ensure that all carers’ work is recognised. [23024/06]
123 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the changes recently announced to benefits designed for carers including the respite care grant; his views on whether these changes are sufficient to cater for the needs of the more than 100,000 carers here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22997/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 86, 97, 105, 121 and 123 together.
Support of carers has been a priority of Government since 1997. Payments to carers have been greatly improved over that period and qualifying conditions for carers allowance have been significantly eased, coverage of the scheme has been extended and new schemes such as carers benefit and the respite care grant have been introduced. The further development of support for carers continues to be a priority for me and for Government.
I have examined the Joint Oireachtas Committee's ‘Report on the Position of Full-Time Carers', which was published in 2003. This valuable report makes a range of recommendations, many of which relate to my Department and a number of which concern the Department of Health and Children. In response to the Committee, who stated that the greatest need identified by family carers is the need for a break from caring, I have made several improvements to the respite care grant.
In 2005 I extended the grant to all carers who are providing full time care to a person who needs such care regardless of their source of income or their means. Those persons in receipt of other social welfare payments, excluding unemployment assistance and benefit, are entitled to this payment subject to meeting the full time care condition. In addition the grant is now paid in respect of each person receiving care. In Budget 2006, I made provision for an increase in the amount of the respite care grant from EUR 1,000 to EUR 1,200, from this month.
The Joint Oireachtas Committee's Report also recommended that where a person who is caring for someone and is in receipt of a widow's or widower's pension he or she should receive a half rate carer's allowance. The primary objective of the social welfare system is to provide income support and, as a general rule, only one weekly social welfare payment is payable to an individual. This ensures that resources are not used to make two income support payments to any one person. Persons qualifying for two social welfare payments always receive the higher payment to which they are entitled.
In Budget 2006, I provided for a significant increase in the rate of carer's allowance. From January this year, the rate of carer's allowance increased to EUR200 per week for carers aged 66 years and over. This rate of payment may be higher in many instances than the rate of old age pension or widow(er)'s pension payable to a person. Such a person who is providing full time care and attention to a person who requires such care may be entitled to receive this higher rate of carer's allowance.
In addition, the means test for carer's allowance has been eased significantly over the years, most notably with the introduction of the disregards of spouses' earnings. Following Budget 2006, since April, a couple with two children can earn up to EUR32,925 per annum and still receive the maximum rate of carer's allowance. The same couple will be able to earn up to EUR54,400 and receive the minimum rate of carer's allowance as well as the free travel, the household benefits package and the respite care grant.
The full-time care and attention requirements for carer's allowance were relaxed from August 1999 to introduce greater flexibility into the carer's allowance scheme, while still safeguarding the needs and interests of care recipients. This allowed carers to work for up to 10 hours per week and it was introduced in recognition of the economic and therapeutic values of work. It also allows carers to maintain contact with the labour market. From 1 June this year I have increased the number of hours a person can engage in employment, self employment or training and education and still be deemed to be providing full time care and attention from 10 to 15 hours per week. This applies to carer's allowance, carer's benefit and respite care grant.
I am always prepared to consider changes to existing arrangements where these are for the benefit of recipients and financially sustainable within the resources available to me. Those recommendations involving additional expenditure can only be considered in a budgetary context.
87 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has given further consideration to standardising the full entitlement to an occupational injury payment to all former miners diagnosed as suffering pneumoconiosis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23109/06]
305 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the projected cost of making full occupational injury benefit payable to sufferers of pneumoconiosis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23249/06]
306 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will authorise the full payment of occupational injury benefit to sufferers of pneumoconiosis who happen to suffer from other respiratory illnesses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23250/06]
307 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of persons diagnosed as suffering from pneumoconiosis; the proportion of such persons who suffer from other respiratory illnesses; if he will issue a directive awarding full payment of occupational injury benefit to such persons solely on the basis of their diagnosis with pneumoconiosis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23251/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 87, 305, 306 and 307 together.
My Department does not create or hold records or statistics in relation to health matters per se. Information relating to occupational diseases regarding miners is only held by my Department in the context of claims made under its Occupational Injuries Benefit scheme. Pneumoconiosis is a prescribed disease for the purpose of this scheme. The legislation governing the Occupational Injuries Scheme provides entitlement to benefit for persons suffering from certain prescribed diseases which are listed in the legislation and where that person has contracted that disease in the course of their employment.
Where a person has contracted one of the diseases listed in the legislation, benefits are payable if they were employed in an occupation which is specifically prescribed in relation to that disease. In addition, benefits may be payable if the claimant can show that the disease was contracted through an employment not specifically prescribed in relation to that disease.
Employment under a contract of service as a miner is insurable for Occupational Injuries Benefit under the Social Welfare Acts. Miners who are unable to work due to an accident arising from their employment may be entitled to occupational injury benefit for the first 26 weeks of their claim. If their incapacity extends beyond that period they may receive Disability Benefit or Invalidity Pension, subject to meeting the qualifying conditions for these payments.
Miners may be entitled to Disablement Benefit if they suffer a loss of physical or mental faculty as a result of an accident at work or a disease prescribed in legislation that they contracted at work. Medical assessments are undertaken in all such cases to determine the degree of disablement, which is calculated by comparison of the state of health of the applicant with a person of the same age and gender.
Persons claiming Occupational Injuries Benefit in cases of Pneumoconiosis are referred to Consultant Respiratory Physicians in the first instance for an examination and report. This examination consists of a clinical assessment and pulmonary function testing (PFT). Disablement benefit is awarded on the basis of the consultant's report, including the pulmonary function test result. The degree of disablement is expressed as a percentage of loss of faculty and the compensation payable varies accordingly.
Loss of faculty may be determined within a range of less than 1% to 100%, depending on the severity of the condition. With regard to the 21 persons currently in receipt of disablement benefit as a result of contracting pneumoconiosis arising from their occupation, the percentage of disablement assessed ranges from 8% to 90%. Expenditure in 2006 for payment of disablement benefit to these recipients will be in excess of €86,000. If all current recipients were assessed at 100% disablement, the total expenditure for 2006 would be over €214,000.
A person must be assessed as having a minimum of 20% loss of faculty before they may be considered as being incapable of work due to their disablement. There would no justification for special arrangements in this regard in the case of Pneumoconiosis.
89 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of offices his Department has throughout the country; the number of these that are accessible to people with disabilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23083/06]
My Department occupies 145 buildings throughout the country of which 129 are open to the public. These include: 65 Inspectors offices, 58 Local Offices, 4 signing centres and 2 Appeals offices.
The Department's main public offices are the 58 Local Offices of which 54 are accessible to people with disabilities. Of the 4 with accessibility problems, (Nth Cumberland St in Dublin, Athlone, Bantry and Buncrana) all will be replaced by new offices over the next 3 years. Regarding the offices for Investigative staff 45 of the 65 are accessible for people with disabilities and further progress is linked to the Disabled Access Programme being undertaken by the Office of Public Works (OPW).
The Department has secured a commitment from OPW to conduct a programme of ‘access audits' on buildings occupied by the Dept. to see what additional improvements can be brought about and the OPW have given an undertaking to carry out necessary alterations/modifications based on the results of these audits. I can assure the Deputy the Department is committed in its Customer Action Plan to provide clean, accessible public offices which ensure privacy, comply with occupational and safety standards and facilitate access for people with disabilities.
90 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the efforts he is making to prevent the situation where many vulnerable people are being forced to use the services of money lenders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23103/06]
129 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the efforts he has made to tackle the financial exclusion from access to financial services for people on social welfare or on low incomes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23101/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 90 and 129 together.
My Department has overall responsibility for the Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS), which provides assistance to people who are over-indebted. A total of 16.41 million euro in funding has been allocated to MABS in 2006, which represents an increase of in excess of twenty percent over the 2005 figure. The service is targeted at those who are on low income or in receipt of social welfare payments. There are 52 MABS companies located in 65 offices throughout the country.
The Money Advice and Budgeting Service has a close and ongoing involvement with my Department at local level. Representatives of the Department are on the boards of management of MABS companies. Membership is also drawn from statutory and voluntary bodies such as the Society of Saint Vincent de Paul, Credit Unions, Citizens Information Centres and the Community Welfare Service. These representatives in turn raise awareness of issues around over-indebtedness in their parent bodies.
Following the release of the report "Do the Poor Pay More" I met with the Irish Banking Federation (IBF) and the Irish Payment Services Organisation (IPSO) and explored ways in which those in the low income bracket could access financial services. Since the introduction of the Money Advice and Budgeting Service in 1992 a good working relationship has been developed between that service and the Irish Bankers Federation. The recent meeting identified a number of areas where it was felt that progress could be made in facilitating wider access to financial services.
MABS National Development Limited (MABSndl) was established in 2004 to support, promote and develop the MABS service. The company is currently working on the development of a national strategy in community education, which will be implemented by the 52 MABS companies. This strategy will seek to empower individuals and communities in developing the skills necessary to deal with debt situations as they arise.
The MABS development company is also devising a strategy to assist the MABS local services to improve further the take up of the Money Advice and Budgeting Service by those on low income. Recent initiatives include media interviews, co-operation with the One Parent Exchange Network (OPEN), the National Adult Literacy Agency (NALA), the Courts Service Information Section, Society of Saint Vincent de Paul, Age Action and Hospital Social Workers.
My Department ensures that MABS information and contact details are included in all relevant social welfare publications and information material produced by the Department. The level of response to MABS indicates there is a high level of awareness of the service. However, I will continue to examine any proposals that would further extend the level of public awareness.
The Service at present is highly regarded and respected and it is important that this continues to be the case. It plays a vital role in assisting persons to be socially and financially included. It is my intention to have legislation enacted as early as possible in order to put the service on a sounder footing to continue its extremely important role in assisting people deal with indebtedness.
91 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the situation whereby many companies with defined benefit pension schemes are unilaterally changing the terms and conditions of those schemes to defined payment schemes; the number of companies who have informed his Department regarding these changes; if he has undertaken to ensure that employees affected by these changes to their pension schemes have been properly informed of the consequences of those changes; the action his Department has taken with the Department of Social and Family Affairs in relation to this matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18206/06]
Occupational pensions in Ireland are voluntary arrangements and, as such, the employer can change the terms of these arrangements. I am aware that there are many pressures on Defined Benefit schemes emanating from the need for employers to increase contributions to schemes, to meet the requirements of accounting standards (FRS17) and also the Funding Standard under the Pensions Act.
The latest figures from the Pensions Board show that as at the 31st of December 2005 there were 1,258 defined benefit schemes registered with the Pensions Board which were subject to the minimum funding standard. In 2005 the Board were notified of the winding-up of a total of 48 group defined benefit schemes. There is no requirement for employers or scheme sponsors to notify the Pensions Board where the nature of a scheme is changed, though a survey undertaken in 2003 suggested that the majority of defined benefit schemes remained open to new members. Defined contribution schemes transfer the investment risk to the employee and there are also concerns about the adequacy of contributions being made to such schemes.
As already indicated, the Funding Standard and new accounting requirements (FRS17), which makes pension costs very apparent on a firm's balance sheet, are put forward as the two main reasons for the drift from defined benefit provision to defined contribution schemes. In relation to the Funding Standard this attempts to draw a reasonable balance between the interests of employers, who must fund pension schemes, and the legitimate expectations of employees to be guaranteed their pension.
In 2003 my predecessor introduced short term measures designed to alleviate the funding crisis in pension schemes, which resulted from a major fall in equity values. The Pensions Board, on foot of a review of the Funding Standard completed in 2004, recommended retention of these provisions, which it found were largely successful. However, what has emerged clearly since these provisions were introduced is that the liability side of pension funds is also under severe pressure.
Improved longevity, lower interest rates and regulation are just some of the factors increasing these liabilities. In the Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2005, I provided that an extended funding period may also be granted in relation to difficulties which defined benefit schemes were experiencing on the liability side. I believe these measures, which were introduced after extensive consultation, achieve the required balance between member protection and encouraging continued defined benefit pension provision.
The Pensions Board, in consultation with key stakeholders, including officials from my Department, is continuing to review the funding standard for defined benefit schemes in the light of experience here and abroad over the last number of years, while also keeping in mind the original objective and intent of that standard. They will report to me later this year in this regard.
In relation to the provision of information to members of schemes affected by changes to their scheme, trustees must account to members for how their scheme is run by providing them with a wide range of personal and scheme information as required under Part 5 of the Pensions Act 1990 and regulations made under this Part. Members of schemes must be informed of any significant changes to the pension scheme. In addition to these Disclosure Regulations, and in compliance with a recent EU Directive, regulations have also been made in relation to how the resources of a scheme are invested. The disclosure of information in a timely manner enables scheme members to monitor their benefits and the financial soundness of their pension schemes.
The Board regards information disclosure and compliance with investment regulations as a very important governance requirement for pension schemes and takes steps to enforce this obligation where necessary. I will continue to monitor, in conjunction with the Board, trends in pension provision, the funding of schemes and the need of scheme members for ongoing information on the condition and status of their pension scheme.
92 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will expand on his recent comments that visionary initiatives are required in social welfare if the State is to adequately meet the scale of emerging employment requirements; if he has examined the impact of increased numbers of EU migrant workers coming to work in Ireland on the welfare system here; if he will consider such a study; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22996/06]
104 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will expand upon the visionary initiatives which he recently referred to at the launch of the information booklet Working for Work, in the context of social welfare, if the State is to adequately meet the scale of emerging employment requirements. [23005/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 92 and 104 together.
Proposals for an innovative programme to promote participation through activation measures aimed at people of working age are under discussion in the context of the preparation of the National Development Plan. Under these proposals my Department would seek to provide a single transparent system with a primary focus on the customer and a route map starting with the first point of engagement with the customer. This will involve an active outcome-focused individual case management of all social welfare customers of working age who are not progressing into employment or accessing training or employment opportunities.
In addition, other Employment Support Schemes are reviewed on a continual basis to ensure their relevance and their continued effectiveness in reaching those most distant from the labour market. In recognition of the difficulties being experienced by some people returning to the labour force after 3 or 5 years of attachment to the live register, the qualifying period for access to both the employment and self-employment strands of Back to Work was reduced to 2 years with effect from March 2006. Also with effect from March 2006 periods spent on Supplementary Welfare Allowance or in the Direct Provision system count towards the qualifying period for Back to Work Allowance and the Back to Education Allowance. It was decided in budget 2006 to extend the National Employment Action Plan to persons aged 55 to 64 who were approaching six months on the live register. Such referrals are to commence no later than September.
There is no evidence that EU migrant workers are having any significant impact on the welfare system here. There were 2,000 persons from the new member states of the EU on the Live Register at the end of April 2006, which amounts to less than 1% of the PPS Numbers (212,933) issued to citizens of these countries over the period January 2004 to April 2006. The figure for supplementary welfare allowance was 902 or 0.5% of the total PPS numbers issued. My officials monitor the impact of migrant workers on social welfare schemes on an ongoing basis.
I have no plans to carry out a study of the impact of migrant workers at this time but I am aware of a study carried out by the Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies on labour market experiences in Ireland and Sweden following EU enlargement. This study concluded that to date the enlargement of the EU has not resulted in any disturbances in the Irish labour market and found no evidence of displacement of native workers.
95 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the average length of time people are waiting on applications for rent allowance to be processed; and if he has satisfied himself in relation to this timescale. [23025/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. Neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to decisions on individual claims. The purpose of the scheme is to provide short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source.
To qualify for rent supplement a person must satisfy a number of conditions. They must be a bona fide tenant, be habitually resident in the State, have a housing need and satisfy a means test. Also, the Health Service Executive must be satisfied that the accommodation is suited to the persons needs and the rent payable is within the prescribed limits.
Typical processing time is three working days, but it can take longer in some instances. The timescale for determining applications for rent supplement in individual cases is dependant, among other things, on the availability of the required information, such as details of the applicant's income, bank statements, information from landlords etc. In addition, some aspects of the application are inevitably time consuming and delays can occur where investigations such as home visits or third party evidence are required. Delays can also arise if the applicant is slow to respond to requests for additional information.
The provision of a prompt service is a major objective of the Executive. However this has to be achieved in a manner that is consistent with the demands of natural justice and the need to ensure that every case is fully investigated. While certain cases may take more time to process than others, overall, I am satisfied that the Executive makes every effort to decide rent supplement claims in an efficient, effective and timely manner.
99 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the discussions he or his officials have had with the Department of Finance and the Revenue Commissioners regarding the one parent family tax credit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23091/06]
In every case where a one-parent family payment is awarded, the maintenance recovery unit of my Department seeks to trace the other parent in order to ascertain whether he or she is in a financial position to pay maintenance either directly to the recipient of the one parent family payment or to contribute towards the cost of one-parent family payment which is paid to their family. In cases where the liable relative does not comply with the requirement to pay maintenance the matter is pursued by the Department and this may include court action where appropriate.
In addition to this, details of non-compliant liable relatives have been forwarded to the Revenue Commissioners for cross-checking to establish if they are in receipt of a one parent family tax credit which is administered by the Commissioners. This exchange of information has been made possible under Section 261(2) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005.
In order to qualify for a one parent family tax credit the claimant must prove that for the year of assessment the qualifying child is resident with him/her for the whole or part of the year. The payment of maintenance is not a qualifying condition for this tax credit, which, I understand, has a monetary value of EUR1,630 per annum.
Officials in my Department have developed a working relationship with the Revenue Commissioners over the past number of years in relation to this matter. Since 2003 the maintenance recovery unit has referred information on approximately 350 cases to the Revenue Commissioners. It is intended that this reporting relationship will continue.
101 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if progress has been made since May 2006 regarding his commitment to examine the proposal of granting free travel to all beneficiaries of an Irish pension. [23022/06]
110 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will clarify comments made in May 2006 in which he appeared to confirm that the Government has effectively abandoned efforts to extend free travel to Irish pensioners living abroad when they return here; the Government’s position on free travel for the Irish abroad; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19718/06]
132 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will award free travel to Irish pensioners living abroad when they return home on holidays; and if he has examined the wider issues of Irish people living abroad who do not hold State pensions but who are over 66, and their entitlement to free travel when they return home on holiday. [23683/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 101, 110 and 132 together.
The free travel scheme is available to all people living in the State aged 66 years or over. All carers in receipt of carer's allowance and carers of people in receipt of constant attendance or prescribed relative's allowance, regardless of their age, receive a free travel pass. It is also available to people under age 66 who are in receipt of certain disability type welfare payments, such as disability allowance, invalidity pension and blind person's pension.
People resident in the State who are in receipt of a social security invalidity or disability payment from a country covered by EU Regulations, or from a country with which Ireland has a bilateral social security agreement, and who have been in receipt of this payment for at least 12 months, are also eligible for free travel.
The scheme provides free travel on the main public and private transport services for those eligible under the scheme. These include road, rail and ferry services provided by companies such as Bus Átha Cliath, Bus Éireann and Iarnród Éireann, as well as Luas and services provided by over 80 private transport operators. The free travel scheme applies to travel within the State and point to point cross border journeys between here and Northern Ireland. In line with the Government objective to put in place an all Ireland free travel scheme for pensioners resident in all parts of this island, I am committed to significantly improving the North/South element of the current arrangements.
There have been a number of requests and enquiries in relation to the extension of entitlement to free travel in Ireland to Irish born people living outside Ireland, or to those in receipt of pensions from my Department, particularly in the UK when they return to Ireland for a visit. I have been advised that it would not be possible to extend entitlement to free travel simply to Irish born people living abroad as to do so would be contrary to European legislation which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of nationality.
Officials from my Department met with European Commission officials in April in an effort to clarify the legal issues involved. In the past few days the Commission's response to the issues raised at that meeting has become available and is currently being examined by my officials.
102 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 70 of 11 May 2006, if he has received the report on the application of unemployment payment scheme conditions to workers who are not employed on a full time basis, including those available for part-time work only; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23086/06]
The unemployment schemes provide income support for people who are seeking their first job or have lost work and are seeking alternative employment. A fundamental qualifying condition for both the unemployment benefit scheme and unemployment assistance scheme is that a person must be available for full-time work.
Where a person is employed for up to three days in a week, s/he may claim Unemployment Benefit in respect of the remainder of the week, subject to being available for full-time work. Benefit is not payable where a person is available for part-time work only.
I recognise the development of a changing labour market with people wishing to have a choice of more flexible work patterns. In this context and to inform future policy in this area, a working group was set up under the Expenditure Review initiative to examine the application of the unemployment payment scheme conditions to workers who are not employed on a full-time basis.
The review will be finalised shortly and the report will be published over the summer period at which stage I will consider its recommendations.
103 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the awarding of pre-entry credits to people who have been absent from the workforce for a considerable time as a result of care duties; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23088/06]
The primary purpose of credited contributions is to protect the social insurance entitlement of insured workers who, for reasons relating either to incapacity, ill-health, unemployment or the provision of care (i.e. for children, the elderly or those with a disability) are not in a position to make PRSI payments.
As a general rule, in order to qualify for credits, a person must be an employed contributor insured under PRSI Classes A, B, C, D, E or H. A recent attachment to the workforce is necessary to avail of credits in that he or she must have paid or credited contributions made in the last 2 complete income tax years. Where a worker has no recent contributions paid or credited, entitlement to credits can be re-established as soon as 26 contributions have been paid.
Pre-entry credits are awarded only once in a person's working life to individuals when they have commenced as an employee for the first time. Credited contributions are designed to assist in establishing entitlement to short-term benefits as soon as possible after commencing employment. There is no legal provision for the award of credited contributions to those who re-enter the workforce as an employee having been temporarily absent from the active labour force.
However, a range of alternatives are available to workers who withdraw from the work force temporarily. These include the homemakers scheme and the voluntary contributions scheme. The Homemakers Scheme aims to protect the old age pension rights of individuals who take time out from the workforce to care for either children (aged 12 years or younger) or incapacitated relatives. This scheme — introduced in April, 1994 — works by disregarding up to 20 full years spent on caring duties when averaging a person's social insurance record for pension purposes. The voluntary contribution scheme allows previously insured workers to maintain their entitlement to long-term benefits through the payment of voluntary PRSI contributions directly to my Department.
Furthermore, my Department operates a number of schemes that cater exclusively for the needs of carers. These schemes provide both means-tested and social insurance-based payments to eligible claimants. The Carer's Allowance is a means-tested payment directed at carers on low incomes who live with and look after persons who require full-time attention. Carer's Benefit is a weekly social insurance payment that is based on PRSI contributions and that supports individuals who are entitled to statutory carer's leave and who give up their job temporarily in order to care for someone. Payments made under both these schemes may also qualify for the award of credited contributions for the duration of the payment.
The range of social welfare supports available to carers is quite comprehensive and has been enhanced considerably in recent years. Budget 2006 contained very significant improvements in the level of support afforded to carers — including the biggest ever increases in the rates of social welfare payments available to them.
I am satisfied that the circumstances in which credited contributions are awarded does not warrant re-examination at this stage. However, my Department constantly monitors the need for amendments or modifications to existing provisions to ensure that the social insurance system continues to meet social protection needs in a changing work and social environment.
107 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress to date on the introduction of a personal pension entitlement for pensioner spouses in receipt of the qualified adult allowance to be set at the level of a full non-contributory pension, as promised in the Programme for Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23094/06]
This Government is committed to introducing a personal entitlement for pensioner spouses, currently in receipt of the qualified adult increase, at the level of a full non-contributory pension and that remains the position. At present the increase for a qualified adult on a contributory pension is 82% of the target rate. Spouses and partners of non-contributory pensioners receive a pension in their own right at age 66.
Since 2002, new pension claimants can opt to have the qualified adult increase paid directly to their spouse or partner. The administrative and legislative implications of enhancing these arrangements to make direct payments more widely available are under consideration.
The cost, based on current rates of payment, of bringing all of the relevant qualified adult rates up to the level of the non-contributory pension personal rate is €55 million in a full year. This commitment will be implemented having regard to available resources and other budgetary commitments.
109 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the estimated increase in the cost of welfare claims in 2007 arising from the entitlement of EU migrant workers to the childcare supplement and child benefit; the level of increase in applications for such benefits that has been evident since the beginning of 2006; his views on these increases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22994/06]
EU Migrant workers have an entitlement to Child Benefit and other "Family benefits" including Early Childcare Supplement (ECS) under EU Regulation 1408/71. Where a national of an EU state with a family is working in Ireland, the worker is entitled to payment of such benefits, even if the children of the worker are resident in the worker's home country.
EU migrant workers in Ireland with an entitlement to family benefits are in one of two categories, those who have their families living with them in Ireland and those whose families reside in their home country. Applications for family benefits from EU migrant workers who come to live in Ireland with their families are dealt with under domestic legislation. Entitlement to Child Benefit is based on the applicant satisfying the Habitual Residency condition and the child being ordinarily resident in Ireland.
Currently there are just under 30,000 EU nationals in receipt of Child Benefit for 53,000 children who are resident with them in Ireland. Of these the majority of recipients — some 16,500 — are UK nationals, with a further 8,000 recipients from the ten EU accession states.
EU nationals who come to work in Ireland but whose families remain in their home country have an entitlement to claim Family Benefits in Ireland under EU regulation 1408/71. At the start of 2006, Child Benefit was in payment under EU regulations for 650 families, in respect of 1320 children, resident outside of the Republic of Ireland. Some 90% of these children are resident in the UK. Currently there are some 950 families, with 1700 children receiving Child Benefit and resident outside Ireland. The majority of these are UK residents.
The number of claims to Child Benefit and Early Child Supplement in respect of non resident EU nationals has, since the start of 2006, averaged close to 300 per week and is currently running at 350 per week compared to 20 per week in the same period in 2005.
As the Deputy will appreciate, it is not possible at this point to forecast the position for the remainder of 2006 or 2007 with accuracy. This will depend on future immigration flows and indeed the number of non-national immigrants who decide to return home. This "churn" effect is difficult to quantify but it appears that some numbers of EU migrant workers may be staying in Ireland for relatively short periods of time. This will mean that those entitled to Child Benefit in 2006 may not be so entitled in 2007 or subsequent years. Best estimates at present would indicate that the numbers of applications may decline somewhat over the coming months as the backlog of applications dries up. New applications received will be from those EU nationals recently arriving to work in Ireland.
It is likely that not every claim received for Child Benefit and ECS will be entitled to benefit. Additionally, some will only have an entitlement to payment of a reduced rate of child benefit as a "supplement" payment, (the supplement represents the difference between the rate of family benefits payable in the country of origin and the rate payable in the country of employment). If the majority of claims received in 2006 were to have an entitlement to Child Benefit, the total potential cost of Child Benefit this year for non resident EU national children could be in the region of EUR30 million or 1.5% of the overall Child Benefit budget of €2.04 billion this year.
The Early Childcare Supplement will be payable to those families in receipt of Child Benefit from my Department with children under 6 years of age. If the number of claims were to continue at current levels, the number of non-resident children qualifying for the ECS payment could approach some 12,000 by the end of 2006. This would accrue a cost of EUR9.5 million in 2006.
111 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the role his Department plays in the policy direction of the social inclusion units at local authority level; and if there is to be an expansion of these units nationwide. [23002/06]
My Department has overall responsibility for co-ordinating the National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion (NAP/inclusion) which represents the Government's strategic multi-faceted approach to tackling poverty. The Office for Social Inclusion, based in my Department, co-ordinates the process mainly at national level, working closely with relevant Departments and the social partners.
Specific responsibility for coordinating the development of social inclusion at local authority level rests with the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. This includes the policy direction and roll out of the Local Authority Social Inclusion units which have already made a valuable contribution to developing a strategic response to promoting social inclusion at local level. The Office for Social Inclusion works closely with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government on social inclusion issues, including in particular the ongoing development of more effective structures for implementing the National Action Plan on social inclusion at local level.
As part of this involvement, the Office is represented on the Social Inclusion Steering Group which co-ordinates the development and implementation of the Local Government Anti-Poverty Learning Network, with which the Combat Poverty Agency also has a strong involvement. This Network has already contributed significantly to the promotion of a strong local anti-poverty focus within the reformed system of local government, providing a forum in which local authorities can share experiences and best practice and consider how to make the maximum contribution to policies to tackle poverty and social exclusion. Representatives of the Local Authority Social Inclusion units are members of this learning network. In addition, the Office for Social Inclusion and the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government recently organised a consultation seminar for local authority staff working in the area of social inclusion. The purpose of this seminar was to inform the development of the next NAP/inclusion, currently being prepared by the Office to cover the period 2006-2008.
The issue of whether there should be an expansion of the social inclusion units and the extent of any such expansion is a matter for the Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government, his Department and the Local Authorities concerned. Given the success of these Units to date, any such expansion would have my full support.
112 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the success of the Family Mediation Service and the services provided by this service; if there are plans to extend these services in view of the large number of people it is currently working with; if new offices are to be opened in the short to medium term; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22983/06]
The Family Mediation Service is a free, professional, confidential service that enables couples who have decided to separate to reach agreement on all issues related to their separation. It assists couples to address the issues on which they need to make decisions including post-separation living arrangements, finances and parenting arrangements to enable children to have an on-going relationship with each parent. The benefits of family mediation as a non-adversarial approach to resolving the issues that arise on separation are increasingly being recognised worldwide.
Over the past number of years the Family Mediation Service has radically expanded to meet a growing need for its service. Over the last few years, the Family Mediation Service has increased from 2 centres in Dublin and Limerick to 16 centres throughout the country. In the past month, two new FMS centres have opened, in Letterkenny to ensure effective access to the service in the North West and in Portlaoise to similarly expand the service in the Midlands.
There has been a dramatic increase in the number of couples seeking mediation, as the benefits of mediation become more widely known. Last year the Service helped approximately 1500 couples — which compares with the figure of 250 a year who used the Service from 1986 up to the end of 1997 before its nation-wide expansion. I would like to pay tribute to the professionalism and hard work of the family mediators who have made a significant contribution to the promotion of the service over the years.
In May of 2003 my predecessor took the development of the service one step further by establishing the Family Support Agency, which will provide a solid and secure base from which this important family service can grow and develop in the future. The Family Support Agency brings together the programmes and family support services formerly under the aegis of my Department. These include services to support families in times of difficulties including the Family Mediation Service, support for voluntary organisations providing counselling and other family supports and a Family Resource Centre programme, which supports and develops local communities. The Family Support Agency is responsible this year for a budget of over EUR20 million for the provision and development of its services.
113 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the plans he has to change the way in which the supplementary welfare allowance is to be administered; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23100/06]
The supplementary welfare scheme is administered by the Community Welfare Service of the Health Service Executive on my behalf. The establishment of the Health Service Executive prompted a fresh consideration of the role and structure of the Community Welfare Service, and of the most appropriate location for that service in the future.
The Commission on Financial Management and Control Systems in the Health Service noted in its report in 2003 that over the years the health system had been assigned responsibility for a number of services which might be regarded as non-core health activities. It recommended that the Government consider assigning non-core activities currently undertaken by agencies within the health service to other bodies.
The Government decided to ask an interdepartmental group to examine this issue. The report of the interdepartmental group was subsequently submitted to, and accepted by, the Government. The report recommends, among other things, that income support and maintenance schemes, together with associated resources, should be transferred to my Department.
This particular initiative has been mooted several times in the past — by the Report of the Commission on Social Welfare in 1986 and by the Review of Supplementary Welfare Allowances by the Combat Poverty Agency in 1991. I welcome this decision as it provides an opportunity to bring about positive change for customers and staff and it is, I believe, a logical approach to provision of these services.
An inter-departmental steering group, comprising officials from my Department, the Department of Finance, the Department of Health and Children and the Health Service Executive, has been established to oversee the implementation of the report's recommendations. There are major organisational, human resource and service delivery issues involved in the transfer. The working group will consult with all relevant stakeholders in relation to this programme of change. I can assure the Deputy that a priority in the context of the transfer process will be to support the high standard of service currently provided by staff in the community welfare service.
The transfer is a major change for all involved but I am confident it will be embraced successfully and will ultimately further enhance the delivery of services to our customers, in particular those who are most disadvantaged in the community.
114 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to reform the social welfare system which continues to be based on a male breadwinner model and which denies women full economic independence. [23023/06]
The social welfare system is designed to provide income supports and access to relevant services in a timely manner to all our customers. The system is now neutral with regard to how it treats men and women; receipt of payment is generally dependent on contingency and other conditions being met. Levels of payment and how they apply are exactly the same for men and women. However, while there is equity in access to the system, the impact of past labour market experience and the traditional roles of women in the home, together with particular features of the social welfare system, can mean that women may be indirectly impacted upon within the system.
The traditional model of social welfare was based on a male breadwinner model, with a father in full-time employment and mother as carer of the children, working full time in the home. Within this system, women tended to have derived rights to social welfare through, for example, their husband's social insurance records, with payments to women defined in relation to their husbands. This model reflected the environment in which the system operated and the roles of men and women in society.
Significant changes have taken place in society in the past two decades and the social welfare system has changed to reflect these changes. Considerable reform and expansion has taken place in the social insurance system to make it as inclusive as possible.
The main beneficiaries of the improvements in coverage and levels of social protection over the past 15 years have been women. For example, in 1991 those in part-time employment were brought into full social insurance cover, in 1995 community employment workers became insurable for all benefits and pensions, in 1997 coverage for maternity and adoptive benefits was extended to the self-employed and in 2002 there were changes to the PRSI contribution conditions which facilitated atypical workers and notably those worksharing. Alongside these changes the expansion of the labour market and changing attitudes towards women's roles have led to increasing numbers of women entering employment and being eligible for social insurance payments in their own right.
The fundamental reforms I am proposing with regard to income support for lone parents and low income families will also address certain other features of the system which may impact more significantly on women. Under the proposals the contingency of lone parenthood would be abolished and instead a new Parental Allowance would be paid to all low income families with qualifying children. In couple households where a Parental Allowance was paid to one of the couple and another social assistance payment made to the other, no limitation on the overall payment to the household would apply. This would increase household income by up to €58 per week and recognises the increasing costs in households with young children.
Another major aspect of the reform being proposed is the ending of the concept of ‘qualified adult' within the system of social assistance. Under the reform, where a household means test is met, all individuals would receive a payment in their own right, thus ensuring consistency in treatment and equity across the social welfare system and recognising the changing role of women in society and the labour market.
These reforms represent a fundamental change in the social welfare system, moving away from derived entitlement to entitlement based on the individual. The social welfare system must reflect the environment in which it operates and meet the changing needs of citizens. One of the most significant changes which has taken place in Irish society is the changing role of women. The fundamental reforms I am proposing for the structure of means tested income support to families, together with the changes which have and will continue to take place in the social insurance system to reflect the changing labour market will ensure that the social welfare system reflects the changing needs of society.
116 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to introduce a second tier support payment for children in unemployed or low-wage households; if so, the progress made to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23096/06]
126 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position in relation to developments within his Department regarding the introduction of a second tier child income payment. [23008/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 116 and 126 together.
Child poverty is a complex area requiring coordinated action across a range of government services and income support payments. The development of income supports which can make the most effective contribution to child poverty lies within my Department's responsibilities and a series of budgets have increased considerably in real terms the level of resources which are going to families with children.
While the solutions to the problem of child poverty cover a wide range of measures, including income supports and services, I am committed to reviewing the role of child income supports in this regard. The National Economic and Social Council was asked to examine the feasibility of merging the family income supplement and child dependant allowance into a second tier child income support. Such a payment would be aimed specifically at targeting child poverty by channelling resources to low-income families without creating significant disincentives to employment.
I look forward to receiving the Council's report on this matter, which will be of significant assistance in informing the future direction of child income support policy.
120 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has intentions of commissioning an investigation into his Department’s practice of re-assessing savings derived from means-tested non-contributory pension payments made to old age pensioners. [23009/06]
In assessing means for social assistance purposes account is taken of any cash income the person may have, together with the value of capital and property (except the home). Capital may include the following:
—Stocks and shares of every description, which are assessed according to their current market value.
—Savings certificates, bonds, national instalment savings, which are assessed according to their current market value.
—Money invested in a bank, building society etc.
The source of any capital held by a pensioner can and does vary. It can include savings from income while formerly working, savings derived from the sale of property or other assets, savings from occupational or social welfare pensions, gifts, inheritances, accumulated interest or dividends or a combination of these. It would not be possible or practical to distinguish savings derived from a particular source. A better approach is to improve the means testing arrangements for pensioners generally and it was in this context that I introduced major improvements for pensioners in the last two Budgets.
For the purposes of old age non-contributory pension, an initial amount of capital has always been disregarded for means test purposes. This amount was £200 up to 1997 and was increased to £2,000 in that year. In October 2000, the disregard was substantially increased to £10,000. In Budget 2005, I was pleased to announce that the amount of capital disregarded for means test purposes for all schemes (except supplementary welfare allowance) was to be increased from EUR12,694.38 to EUR20,000, an increase of over EUR7,300 with effect from June 2006.
These new arrangements mean that a single non-contributory pensioner, with no other means, can have capital of up to EUR28,000 and still qualify for a pension at the maximum rate. This figure is doubled in the case of a pensioner couple.
In Budget 2006, I announced that I propose to establish, a standardised State (Non-Contributory) Pension, replacing the Old Age Pension and, for recipients aged 66 and over, Blind Pension, Widow/er's Pension, One Parent Family Payment, Deserted Wife's Allowance and Prisoner's Wife's Allowance. All the schemes in question feature a common means disregard of EUR7.60 per week, which dates back to the 1970s. The means disregard for the new non-contributory pension will be EUR20 per week, an increase of EUR12.40 per week. Over 30,000 pensioners who are currently in receipt of a reduced rate of payment will gain from this change.
The increase in the general means disregard, from EUR7.60 to EUR20 per week, specifically benefits those older persons who are in receipt of reduced rate non-contributory pensions because one or both of a couple have income from capital, occupational pensions, foreign social security pensions or from some other source. Furthermore, consequent on the increase in the means disregard to EUR20 per week with effect from the end of September next, a single person, with no other means, will be able to have up to EUR35,000 in capital and still qualify for a pension at the maximum rate. This figure is doubled in the case of a pensioner couple.
These improvements, along with record increase in the personal and QAA rates of payment, have been of considerable benefit to all pensioners.
122 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the controls which he intends to introduce to ensure that the child benefit payments only go to those migrant workers who are entitled to them. [23001/06]
Currently EU migrant workers in Ireland with an entitlement to Child Benefit are in one of two categories, those who have their families living with them in Ireland and those whose families reside in their home country. Applications for child benefit from EU migrant workers who come to live in Ireland with their families are dealt with under domestic legislation. Entitlement to Child Benefit is based on the applicant satisfying the Habitual Residency condition and the child being ordinarily resident in Ireland.
Before Child Benefit is awarded the Department will confirm that the applicant or spouse is in insurable employment in Ireland and that the children are resident in the country. Employment status is confirmed either directly with the employer or via the commencement of employment data held by the Department. The residency of the child is normally confirmed with the school the child is attending. If the child is not yet school age, the parent will be asked to provide confirmation from the family doctor or other nominated professional, of the child's residency in Ireland. Birth certificates for the children are obtained.
When the Department is satisfied that the qualifying conditions have been met, the claim is put into payment and a notification is sent to the EU country where the family previously lived to inform them that the family now resides in Ireland and that Child Benefit is being paid here. The authorities in the other member state will then take any necessary action to regularise the customer's payments (if any) in that jurisdiction.
Child Benefit customers are informed at the time of their claim, and in ongoing communications, of their obligation to inform the Department of any change in circumstances that may affect their entitlement to benefit. Regular checks are carried out to ensure that those in receipt of the benefit are entitled to it. These include the use of mailshots and follow-up Social Welfare inspector visits as required.
Migrant workers who are not EU nationals are dealt with in the same manner as EU nationals but Child Benefit section also confirm that the person is registered with the Garda National Immigration Board (GNIB) as legally resident in the state. EU nationals who come to work in Ireland but whose families remain in their home country have an entitlement to claim Family Benefits in Ireland under EU regulation 1408/71.
When an application is received from an EU migrant worker whose family are resident in another member state, the Child Benefit Office contact the relevant authorities in the member state where the workers family reside. As part of the ongoing control process Child Benefit section contacts the other EU country on a regular basis, normally every three months, to confirm the family situation has not changed.
In view of the increasing numbers of claims under EU regulations for non resident children, additional control procedures are also being introduced for Child Benefit claims to confirm that only those entitled to the benefit receive it.
125 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has intentions of abolishing the limitation rule which applies when two adults have eligibility for social assistance in their own right. [23004/06]
Where both members of a couple are claiming social welfare payments and one or both of the claimants is in receipt of unemployment assistance, farm assist or pre-retirement allowance their combined payments cannot exceed the amount which would be payable if only one person was being paid with an increase for a qualified adult dependant, where appropriate. In this situation one or both of the payments would be limited to ensure that the relevant household rate of payment would not be exceeded.
My department has recently published a Government discussion paper: Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents. Under these proposals for reform of income support arrangements for lone parents and low income families, a new parental allowance for all low income families with children under a specified age would replace both the current one-parent family payment and the qualified adult allowance in social assistance. In these circumstances no limitation would apply where a parental allowance recipient cohabits with a person in receipt of a social assistance payment, e.g. unemployment assistance.
Lifting limitation for this limited period of time would have the effect of increasing household income in such situations by up to €58 per week, recognising the higher costs associated with care of young children. It would also assist in addressing the problem of poverty among children in low income families. Any proposal to abolish the limitation rule in full could only be considered in a budgetary context and in the light of competing priorities.
127 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the supports he is making available to encourage the development of community councils and other such groups; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22924/06]
The provision of supports for community groups is now a matter appropriate to my colleague the Minister for Community Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
133 Mr. Kenny asked the Taoiseach the number of full-time farmers and part-time farmers in County Mayo for each year from 1995 to 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23687/06]
The exact information requested by the Deputy is not available. The Farm Structure Survey provides regional estimates and the table shows figures for the West region in June 1995, 1997, 2000 and 2003 (the latest year currently available).
|
Year |
Farmwork is sole occupation of farm owner |
Farmwork is not sole occupation of farm owner |
Total |
|
1995 |
21,400 |
12,500 |
33,900 |
|
1997 |
20,900 |
11,900 |
32,800 |
|
2000* |
17,100 |
15,500 |
32,600 |
|
2003 |
17,000 |
14,900 |
31,900 |
*June 2000 Census of Agriculture figure.
The West region comprises counties Mayo, Roscommon, Galway County and Galway County Borough. Figures at county level are available from the 2000 Census of Agriculture. There were 12,500 farms in county Mayo in June 2000; on 6,600 of these, farmwork was the owner's sole occupation.
134 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Taoiseach the number of live births born to under 15 year olds, 15 to 16 year olds, 16 to 17 year olds, 17 to 18 year olds, 18 to 19 year olds, 19 to 20 year olds and 20 to 21 year olds in the years 1960, 1965, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. [23436/06]
Separate data on the number of live births to mothers aged under 15, and to mothers aged 15 to 16, are not available for the years 1960, 1965, 1970, and 1975. Accordingly, the total number of live births to mothers aged under 16 is given for all years.
|
1960 |
1965 |
1970 |
1975 |
1980 |
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
2000 |
2005 |
|
|
Under 15 |
13 |
5 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
7 |
||||
|
15 to 16 |
50 |
36 |
54 |
42 |
57 |
35 |
||||
|
Under 16 |
40 |
34 |
28 |
60 |
63 |
41 |
66 |
53 |
67 |
42 |
|
16 to 17 |
66 |
78 |
106 |
197 |
196 |
155 |
178 |
206 |
206 |
182 |
|
17 to 18 |
164 |
276 |
324 |
465 |
533 |
413 |
458 |
431 |
504 |
388 |
|
18 to 19 |
265 |
482 |
613 |
972 |
1,023 |
803 |
790 |
782 |
973 |
772 |
|
19 to 20 |
455 |
851 |
1,038 |
1,561 |
1,765 |
1,229 |
1,176 |
995 |
1,366 |
1,043 |
|
20 to 21 |
845 |
1,275 |
1,738 |
2,280 |
2,308 |
1,619 |
1,239 |
1,172 |
1,566 |
1,252 |
135 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason children’s rights have not been incorporated into Irish legislation in the context of the Second Shadow Report to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child; if there are plans to make children’s rights explicit in the Constitution; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23330/06]
The former National Children's Office (now subsumed into the Office of the Minister for Children) undertook responsibility for the co-ordination and transmission of Ireland's Second Report to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. The report deals specifically with this issue. With regard to the full incorporation of the UN Convention into Irish law the State party report states: The All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution review of the Articles in the Constitution dealing with the family was published in 2006. The Review Group recommendation was that a new section should be inserted in Article 41 dealing with the rights of children as follows: All children, irrespective of birth, gender, race or religion, are equal before the law. In all cases, where the welfare of the child so requires, regard shall be had to the best interests of that child.
The Committee's recommendations are under consideration by the Government. The complexities involved in holding a referendum require that the careful consideration be given to the frequency with which referenda can be realistically held and the significance of the issues in question. There are no specific plans to hold any referenda during the lifetime of the 29th Dail.
It should also be noted that a number of the rights set out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child are already provided for in the Constitution, either expressly or impliedly. Others are provided for in legislation. Yet other rights were, or are now, provided for in the State on an administrative basis. Important milestones in Ireland with regard to strengthening children's rights include:
•Status of Children Act, 1987, which abolished discrimination against non-marital children;
•Child Care Act, 1991, deals with children in need of care and protection. The promotion of the welfare of children is the paramount principle underpinning the Act.
•Children Act, 1997, which updated the law on guardianship, custody and access and which introduced a comprehensive range of measures to safeguard the interests of child;
•Criminal Law Act 1997 Section 12 of the Act abolished the power of a court to impose a sentence of corporal punishment.
•Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997 Section 24 of the Act abolished the common law rule under which teachers had immunity from criminal liability for physically punishing pupils.
•Education Act, 1998 giving a statutory basis to existing arrangements governing the running of schools at primary and post-primary level including making provision, in the interests of the common good, for the education of every person in the State including those who have a disability or who have other special educational needs.
•The Education (Welfare) Act, 2000 which established the National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) on a statutory basis as the single national body with responsibility for school attendance and provides a comprehensive framework promoting regular school attendance and tackling the problems of absenteeism and early school leaving.
•The Equal Status Act, 2000 provides protection against direct and indirect discrimination outside of employment on nine grounds. These are: gender; marital status; family status; sexual orientation; religion; age; disability; race; membership of the Traveller Community.
•The Children Act 2001, which was passed by the Oireachtas in June 2001, constitutes a fundamental revision of existing legislation governing the treatment of children in conflict with the law and non-offending children in need of special care or protection.
•Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act, 2004 which provides for the education of people with special educational needs.
136 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her views on the fact that while old age pensioners can get free driving licences, they have to pay €35 for a doctors certificate sometimes on a yearly basis, even though they have a medical card; the steps she will take to rectify this anomaly; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23702/06]
In making arrangements for the provision of publicly funded GP services, under the General Medical Services Scheme, an agreement was negotiated between the Department of Health and Children and the GP representative body, the Irish Medical Organisation (IMO). The provisions of this agreement took the form of the current GMS GP Capitation Contract. This contract is a treatment based contract and gives effect to the statutory requirement to provide free GP medical and surgical services to eligible people which includes people aged 70 and over who are automatically entitled to a medical card. The contract stipulates that the fees paid to the GMS GP's are not made in respect of certain certificates which may be required for example ‘under the Social Welfare Acts or for the purposes of insurance or assurance policies or for the issue of driving licences'. As these non-treatment type services are outside of the GMS GP contract it is a matter between the GP and the person seeking the particular services to agree a fee.
While certificates for applications are provided by medical practitioners they are not a medical service and are not considered a core aspect of public health service provision. Requiring such services to be provided within the terms of the GMS GP contract would more than likely lead to a costly counterclaim by GPs which if allowed would not represent appropriate or best use of resources in terms of current health policy.
137 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the grants and funding available to a group (details supplied) in County Kildare by her Department for the provision of security equipment and landscaping of their new facility; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23709/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
138 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in County Kildare cannot receive financial assistance for transport costs for their child’s hospital appointments in view of the fact that there is no ambulance services provided; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23710/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
139 Dr. Cowley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her Department has plans to introduce screening of B Strep infection for pregnant woman; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23297/06]
Formal screening for B streptococcus is not carried out at present but the issue is being kept under review.
140 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be called for a procedure in Galway Regional Hospital. [23327/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this case investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
141 Mr. Aylward asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason for the delay in opening the new dialysis unit at St. Luke’s Hospital, Kilkenny; and when this unit is expected to open. [23343/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
142 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason the condition of a person (details supplied) in County Clare deteriorated to such an extent that an amputation was necessary; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23355/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
143 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she has received reports or correspondence in relation to the health dangers posed to workers in the asbestos industry here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23356/06]
My Department has no record of having received reports or correspondence of the type referred to by the Deputy. The Deputy may wish to note that the Health and Safety Authority is the national body with responsibility for securing health and safety at work. The Authority has legal powers under the European Communities (Protection of Workers) (Exposure to Asbestos) Regulations 1989 (as amended) to ensure the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to asbestos at work. The Authority operates under the aegis of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
144 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason no autopsy was carried out on a person (details supplied). [23365/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
145 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the length of time stents that are surgically inserted in the treatment of coronary illnesses are meant to last; if they are meant to be replaced; if so, the time intervals at which they should be replaced; and if patients who have had them inserted are meant to have regular checkups. [23366/06]
Cardiac stents have provided a major advance in the treatment of coronary artery disease and have led to a reduction in the need for coronary by-pass surgery in certain cases. They are implanted by cardiologists based on careful clinical assessments. Once they are put in place they remain in place and become incorporated into the wall of the blood vessel. Patients with coronary artery disease are monitored regularly and, if clinical circumstances dictate, further stenting may take place. There are no timeframes for replacement as these are dependent on the clinical condition of the patient.
146 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the position in relation to the case of a person (details supplied); and if the family will be given the maximum support. [23369/06]
In February 2004, Frances Sheridan died after being discharged from the Accident and Emergency Department of Cavan General Hospital. Last December an inquest was held into her death, presided over by the acting coroner for County Cavan. Following the hearing of the inquest, the jury returned a verdict of death by natural causes.
In January 2006, solicitors representing the family wrote to the Attorney General requesting that he direct a fresh inquest pursuant to his statutory power under the Coroners Act 1962. In April, the Attorney General, directed that the acting coroner hold a new inquest.
My Department is advised that the second inquest has now been completed, and that on 16 June last a verdict of death by medical misadventure was returned. I would like to again extend my deepest sympathies to the family of the late Frances Sheridan on their sad loss and to assure them that the issue of patient safety is being treated as a top priority by the Executive. We must do everything possible to avoid a repeat of this tragic event.
My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Health Service Executive to arrange to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy in relation to the action it proposes to take arising from this tragedy.
147 Mr. O’Connor asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her views on proposals in the UK to heavily fine those who attack health care workers; her further views on whether such a development would be useful here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23388/06]
The Deputy will be pleased to note that my colleague the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has brought forward a proposal, by way of a Committee Stage amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill 2004, to address the problem of assaults and obstruction of personnel engaged in providing emergency services, including problems relating to assaults in hospitals, particularly in Accident and Emergency departments. The Minister's proposal amends section 19 of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 which currently provides for offences relating to assault or obstruction of a peace officer, so as to broaden its scope of application and increase the relevant penalties.
The Minister's proposal expands the definition of ‘peace officers' to include members of the fire brigade and ambulance personnel. The current definition of ‘peace officers' covers members of the Garda Síochána, Defence Forces or prison officers acting in the execution of their duty. The range of proscribed conduct is also being broadened to cover threats to commit assault. In addition, it is proposed to provide for an offence in relation to threats, assaults, wilful obstruction and impeding of doctors, nurses and other health service workers in or at a hospital.
The Minister's proposal, as agreed recently by the Select Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights, provides for a maximum penalty for assault or threats to commit assault of a fine or 7 years imprisonment or both. The maximum penalty in relation to wilful obstruction or impeding health service workers will be a fine or 6 months imprisonment or a fine not exceeding €2,500.
148 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to a previous Parliamentary Question if she will arrange an occupational therapists report in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny relative to their needs and the provision of care in their own home; if the Health Service Executive will prioritise their case in view of their immediate needs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23389/06]
I understand from the Health Service Executive that due to an incorrect surname being given by the Deputy the matter raised in the original Parliamentary Question is still under investigation.
The Deputy's current question also relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
149 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if an application for a medical card in the name of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny will be approved; if the general practitioner named by the applicant will be approved in view of the circumstances of the case; and if she will expedite a response. [23390/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
150 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if a response will be expedited in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny who has applied for nursing home subvention. [23391/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
151 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of posts which were terminated in the context of the termination of posts in the former health boards; the superannuation arrangements which were made for personnel to transfer to other sections; and if any persons qualified under the abolition of posts criteria for special payments. [23396/06]
152 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the regulations and legislation which were applied in deciding on the termination payments for the former chief executive officers of the health boards. [23397/06]
153 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the regulations and legislation which were applied in deciding on the termination payments for the former non-chief executive officer posts of the health boards. [23398/06]
178 Mr. Connolly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of early retirement deals awarded to previous health board staff due to the demise of the former health boards and the formation of the Health Service Executive; the cost of such early retirement deals to the Exchequer; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23550/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 151, 152, 153 and 178 together.
Section 60 (1) of the Health Act, 2004 states that "Each person who, immediately before the establishment day, was an employee of a specified body is, on that day, transferred to and becomes an employee of the Executive." In accordance with section 60 of the Act no redundancies occurred, either of a compulsory or voluntary nature, as a consequence of the recent health reforms.
Employment in the Health Boards/ERHA/ Area Boards is superannuated under the Local Government (Superannuation) (Consolidation) Scheme — S.I. 455 of 1998 (LGSS). The superannuation benefits of permanent officers ceasing to hold office are covered under sections 70 and 71 of the Scheme and provide for retirement lump sum and annual pension. Benefits of certain managers, ie those at CEO level, on fixed term contracts are provided for under Section 78 of the Scheme and entitlements include immediate pension, retirement lump sum, 26 weeks severance gratuity, and added years (subject to maximum of ten years). Membership of and the payment of employee contributions to the superannuation scheme is mandatory for all employees.
Ten of the twelve former CEOs opted to exit the system (nine on contract and one permanent post holder (who had full service)). In addition, following discussions under the auspices of Mr. Finbarr Flood, acting as Mediator, exit terms were to be supplemented as follows:
1. a once-off payment of €10,000 to all CEOs in recognition of the legal duties and functions of the chairpersons and members of the Health Boards having been statutorily assigned to them during the period 1st July 2004 to 31st December 2004,
2. a re-training grant of up €10,000 to be paid on basis of vouched expenditure,
3. an ex gratia payment equivalent to six months' gross salary.
Proposals 2 and 3 applied to those CEOs who requested to leave the HSE by 1st July 2005. These proposals were put forward by the Mediator on the basis of: the uniqueness of the position of the CEOs within the context of the abolition of the Health Boards and the transition to the HSE structures under the Government's health service reform programme, and also the leading role played by the CEOs in facilitating the transfer of accountability and ensuring a safe passage to the new structures.
Apart from the CEO posts, three additional posts have been abolished: one contract post (to which Section 78 applied) and two permanent posts. Sections 11 and 66 of the Scheme provide for an "addition to pensionable local service" of a pensionable officer. These sections provide for a qualifying permanent post holder, who ceases to hold office, to be awarded notional added years for superannuation purposes in certain circumstances.
The costs of the superannuation benefits payable were administered by the Health Service Executive and I understand that the cost of providing superannuation benefits and ex gratia payments to former Chief Executive Officers was in the region of €3.4 million. The costs of superannuation benefits payable to the additional three persons who had left the HSE was in the region of €0.5 million. I have asked the HSE to notify the Deputies of the exact figure in due course.
Finally you may wish to note that in the normal course of events where a post becomes vacant, the decision on whether or not to fill that post is a management decision for the HSE.
154 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the cost of court cases and legal expenses accrued to her Department by virtue of their contesting the case of a person (details supplied) in County Wicklow; if she will review their entitlement to abolition of post payments on the dissolution of the National Rehabilitation Board; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23399/06]
158 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which she proposes to deal with the many difficulties in view of legal implications that have arisen concerning the High Court ruling regarding a redundancy from National Rehabilitation Board in 2000 for a person (details supplied) in County Wicklow. [23403/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 154 and 158 together.
As the Deputy was informed in my response to his question of 9 May 2006, the matter to which he refers is a technical legal matter concerning a claim for redundancy taken to the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) and appealed to the High Court by an individual, a former employee of the National Rehabilitation Board (NRB), who had not accepted employment with any of the designated public bodies under the relevant Statutory Instruments on the dissolution of the NRB.
As previously advised, the EAT decided on 19 April 2002 that the named individual had been dismissed (within the special meaning of section 21 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967) by reason of redundancy, being therefore entitled to a redundancy payment. The EAT decided that the claim lay against the Minister for Health and Children as representative of the NRB (dissolved). On appeal in July 2003, the High Court found that the EAT had erred in law in determining that the Minister for Health and Children was the representative of the National Rehabilitation Board. Following this decision, the EAT on the 13 February, 2004 made a finding of redundancy in the case of the individual concerned against the NRB (Dissolved), stating that the amount due was payable from the Social Insurance Fund.
The cost of the court case and legal expenses to my Department were nil as the case was carried by the Office of the Chief State Solicitor. Under the relevant Statutory Instrument on the dissolution of the NRB and the Health Act 2004, the Health Service Executive is the authority vested to exercise right/discretion in relation to the superannuation issues of the individual concerned. I am advised by the Executive that it has authorised the termination of office of the individual as arising from abolition of office and his pension has been adjusted accordingly.
It is important for the Deputy to understand that the EAT did not address the position of other staff in the NRB; it dealt solely in respect of a claim by one individual who did not accept employment with one of the bodies under the SI.
155 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the position regarding the review in the context of the Dáil Éireann debate of 18 May 2006, when she undertook to review the situation of the former staff of the National Rehabilitation Board; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23400/06]
156 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in the context of her decision to abolish the National Rehabilitation Board in 2000, she will appoint a Department official to deal with the residual difficulties that have arisen in the context of employment law; if she will resolve difficulties arising under S.I. 170 and 171 of 2000. [23401/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 155 and 156 together.
I have considered the issues raised in the Dail on 18 May 2006 in relation to the dissolution of the national Rehabilitation Board. These matters have been comprehensively dealt with in a number of PQs.
The National Disability Authority Act 1999 provided for the establishment of the National Disability Authority and is the legal basis for Statutory Instrument No. 170 of 2000 which transferred certain properties, rights and liabilities of the National Rehabilitation Board (NRB) to the National Disability Authority, FÁS, Comhairle and the Eastern Regional Health Authority; and for S.I. No. 171 of 2000 which dissolved the NRB and provided for the transfer of its 184 staff to these four bodies.
Employees of the former National Rehabilitation Board were members of the Local Government Superannuation Scheme. Under that scheme no provision for co-ordination of benefits (ie. between the occupational pension and the contributory Old Age pension) existed for officers. Therefore employees of the National Rehabilitation Board who were Class A PRSI contributors were entitled to a non co-ordinated occupational pension on retirement. The dissolution of the NRB followed on from intensive consultation between NRB management and staff under an independent mediator culminating in an IR agreement within which the existing terms and conditions of staff, including superannuation, PRSI status and incremental dates were protected.
Section 28(8) of the National Disability Authority Act, 1999 provided protection of terms and conditions of employment to staff transferring to other agencies from the National Rehabilitation Board. The protection offered at the dissolution of the NRB extends to immediate re-deployment only. The existing pension rights of all former staff transferred to the receiving employer. If staff subsequently changed employment again (e.g. open competition) regardless of whether the posts advertised related to previous functions of the NRB, they took on the employment terms and conditions associated with the new post.
As the Deputy is aware, one former employee of the NRB did not accept employment with any of the designated bodies. He took a claim for redundancy to the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) which made a finding of redundancy against the NRB (dissolved). He then sought to have his retirement from the NRB treated as arising from abolition of office. I am advised that this was recently granted by the Health Service Executive. It is important for the Deputy to understand that the EAT dealt solely in respect of a claim by one individual who did not accept employment with one of the designated bodies.
The question of abolition of office terms, provided for under Articles 11 and 66 of the Local Government Superannuation Scheme, does not arise for the former staff of the NRB where they transferred to one of the designated bodies.
As I have said the terms and conditions of employees transferring to other agencies were protected on dissolution of the NRB under the relevant legislation and are now a matter for the current employers. In the event that matters arise which are the responsibility of my Department this will be dealt with in the normal way.
157 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the funds allocated to the National Rehabilitation Board for each of the years between 1990 and 2000 in the context of previously unanswered parliamentary questions regarding the NRB. [23402/06]
The funds which were allocated to the National Rehabilitation Board for the years 1990 to 2000 are as shown.
|
Year |
Allocation €M |
|
€M |
|
|
1990 |
4.588 |
|
1991 |
4.350 |
|
1992 |
4.232 |
|
1993 |
4.586 |
|
1994 |
7.111 |
|
1995 |
14.938 |
|
1996 |
15.957 |
|
1997 |
16.649 |
|
1998 |
17.318 |
|
1999 |
24.180 |
|
2000 |
10.587 |
159 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in the context of the dissolution of National Rehabilitation Board in 2000, a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath is entitled to an abolition of posts pension as was the case of another former employee of the NRB in similar circumstances. [23404/06]
160 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the measures which can be taken in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath who was working for the National Rehabilitation Board when it was dissolved, to ensure their entitlement to an un-coordinated pension when they reach 65. [23405/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 159 and 160 together.
The National Disability Authority Act 1999 provided for the establishment of the National Disability Authority and is the legal basis for Statutory Instrument No. 170 of 2000 which transferred certain properties, rights and liabilities of the National Rehabilitation Board (NRB) to the National Disability Authority, FÁS, Comhairle and the Eastern Regional Health Authority; and for S.I. No. 171 of 2000 which dissolved the NRB and provided for the transfer of its 184 staff to these four bodies (referred to here as the receiving employer).
My understanding is that the person concerned transferred to FÁS on the dissolution of the National Rehabilitation Board. I understand that this person has subsequently moved to employment in the Health Service Executive.
Employees of the former National Rehabilitation Board were members of the Local Government Superannuation Schemes. Under that scheme no provision for co-ordination of benefits (i.e. between the occupational pension and the contributory Old Age pension) existed for officers. Therefore employees of the National Rehabilitation Board who were class A PRSI contributors were entitled to a non-co-ordinated occupational pension on retirement.
Section 28(8) of the National Disability Authority Act, 1999 provided protection of terms and conditions of employment to staff transferring to other agencies from the National Rehabilitation Board. The protection offered at the dissolution of the NRB extends to immediate re-deployment only. The existing pension rights of all former staff transferred to the receiving employer. If staff subsequently changed employment again (e.g. open competition) regardless of whether the posts advertised related to previous functions of the NRB, they took on the employment terms and conditions associated with the new post.
The question of abolition of terms, provided under article 11 and 66 of the Local Government Superannuation Scheme, does not arise for the former staff of the NRB where staff transferred to the receiving employer.
161 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if €630 will be refunded to a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3. [23409/06]
The €630 amount constitutes an excess charge, the level of insurance held by the person not being sufficient to provide full cover for services at the hospital concerned. The level of health insurance cover that a person takes out with an insurer is a personal choice. Where a person avails of services not covered by their insurance plan they are liable for any additional costs that arise. It is not open to my Department nor the Health Service Executive to cover such costs. Persons may qualify for tax relief on unreimbursed medical expenses. Any application should be made to the Revenue Commissioners.
The accommodation and related care issues outlined in the details supplied relate to services provided to a private patient in a private hospital. Such services are provided on the basis of a private contract between the two parties, the patient as the service user and the hospital as the service provider. The Department of Health and Children has no role in this relationship. Any difficulties experienced should be resolved between the two parties involved. The Deputy may wish to contact the hospital directly in relation to those issues.
162 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason for the dismissal of a person (details supplied) at Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin; if it was due to cutbacks in paediatrics; the reason for the postponement of patients’ appointments; if the patients under their care will have to be reassessed from the beginning; if patients or their guardians were informed of what had occurred; if not, the reason for same; the situation regarding patients on medication that will need authorisation for renewal of courses of treatment; if she will provide a time by which the person is likely to be replaced or the situation sorted; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23417/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
163 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason the home help provided to a person (details supplied) in County Mayo has been discontinued; the changes which have taken place to justify the removal of their home help hours; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23418/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
164 Mr. Lowry asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the rate of nursing home subvention top-up payments paid in each Health Service Executive region; if she will confirm that patients in the Dublin region are receiving a top-up payment in the order of €700 per week; if patients in other parts of the country will receive similar top-up rates; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23419/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
165 Mr. Lowry asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of oncology nurses in each oncology unit in the country; if oncology nurses trained to clinical nurse specialist level or clinical nurse manager level are employed at that grade; the reasons for delays in ensuring that CNS personnel within the oncology sector are using their skills at this level; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23420/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to examine the matter raised and to reply directly to the Deputy.
166 Mr. Perry asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the directive she has issued in relation to insurance indemnity for facilities that have defibrillators installed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23426/06]
The Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death, whose report "Reducing the Risk: A Strategic Approach" was published in March 2006, recognises the need for early cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Overall responsibility for implementation of the report's recommendations has been assigned to the Health Service Executive. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
167 Dr. Cowley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason persons (details supplied) in County Mayo who must attend appointments for the treatment of breast cancer and for prostate problems have to fight for transport to get to their appointments which are on-going; her views on whether it is fair that elderly people have this additional stress on them when trying to cope with their medical conditions; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23433/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to examine the matter raised and to reply directly to the Deputy.
168 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of new home care packages that have been rolled out in counties Galway, Roscommon and Leitrim in 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23434/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to examine the matter raised and to reply directly to the Deputy.
169 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in County Clare did not qualify for a medical card; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23442/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
170 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the status of the working group on haemochromatosis; when it will complete its deliberations; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23443/06]
As the Deputy is aware, I set up a Haemochromotosis Working Group in March 2006 to examine all of the issues relating to haemochromotosis in Ireland and to advise on the actions necessary to address the problems caused by haemochromotosis.
The Working Group has met formally on three occasions and held a number of other informal sub-group meetings. The Group will present its report to me in the coming weeks.
171 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 332 of 26 January 2005, when she will complete the strategic review of existing service provision for persons with disabilities; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23447/06]
In accordance with a commitment in "Sustaining Progress", the Department of Health and Children has carried out a strategic review of specialist health service provision for people with disabilities, in consultation with relevant interests. A document setting out the key findings of the review will be made available as soon as it has been finalised.
172 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the action she will take to support polio survivors; if she will establish a committee to examine the issues surrounding this condition and to address access to aids and appliances and respite care; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23448/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
173 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if an application for domiciliary care allowance in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Louth will be re-examined in view of the serious medical grounds; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23468/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
174 Mr. Bruton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she has reviewed the level of service available to the young people and to their families who become victims of underage sexual assault; if she has satisfied herself that an adequate system is in place to support these families; and the further initiatives she plans to take for the future. [23534/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
175 Mr. Carey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if there is a scheme which would assist a person (details supplied) in Dublin 11 to build additional accommodation to relieve overcrowding in their home which they are purchasing to specifically cater for the needs of the long term foster care of two children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23535/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
176 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of patients treated under the National Treatment Purchase Fund; and the number of these treated in the same hospital for which they were on the waiting list for treatment. [23538/06]
The National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) was established as one of the key actions for dealing with public hospital waiting lists arising from the 2001 Health Strategy. To date, the NTPF has arranged treatment for some 42,000 patients. The NTPF purchases procedures for public patients predominantly from private hospitals in Ireland. The Strategy envisaged that the NTPF might also make use of any capacity within public hospitals to arrange treatment for public patients. It was recognised that during the start-up phase of the Fund, the use of public capacity could account for up to 30% of total NTPF activity, once public core service planned activity was not compromised. In June 2005 my Department advised NTPF that use by the Fund of public facilities should be limited to 10% of its total referrals for treatment.
My Department has asked the Acting Chief Executive of the Fund to respond to the Deputy in relation to the detailed information requested.
177 Mr. Deasy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her views regarding the growing number of pharmacies that are sited in health centres developed by doctors; her further views on whether this will provide an unfair disadvantage to other pharmacies in the area; her plans to introduce regulations to prevent same from happening; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23549/06]
On foot of the recommendations of the Pharmacy Review Group, my Department has commenced drafting new pharmacy legislation in two pharmacy Bills. The first Bill is to deal with fitness to practice provisions for pharmacists, the removal of the prohibition — the derogation — on non-Irish graduates being supervising pharmacists in pharmacies less than 3 years old, and a stronger statutory basis for the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI).
The second Bill will address the regulation of pharmacy and pharmacy services, including the definition of pharmacy services and of a community pharmacy, enhanced provisions for the inspection of pharmacies, and the provision for regulation of pharmacies for matters such as physical conditions, standards, record keeping and promotional activities. It is also proposed to deal with general provisions relating to community pharmacy contracts for services, as well as the remaining recommendations of the Pharmacy Review Group.
The Government accepted the Review Group recommendation that there should be no beneficial ownership or business interest of any kind between prescribing and dispensing and, in regard to multi-GP practices with adjacent pharmacies, that contracted pharmacies and general practices should occupy discrete premises, with separate entrances. I have agreed to consider the potential conflict of interest issues arising from the development of health centres with adjacent contracted pharmacies and this issue will be addressed in the second Bill in the light of that examination.
In the interim, my Department has advised the Health Service Executive to take due care in assessing pharmacy contract applications so that any commercial relationship between a pharmacy contractor and a health centre will not affect the proper provision of services as required under clauses 21, 22(3), 22(4) and 23 of the pharmacy contract, dealing with ownership of pharmacies and beneficial interest. I have also written to the Medical Council in relation to this issue.
The Deputy will note that the location of services is a land use planning issue and therefore a matter for the relevant planning authority. I am not in a position to dictate the location of privately funded and owned pharmacies or GP practices, nor to restrict the awarding of State pharmacy contracts based on location.
179 Mr. Lowry asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason it takes 21 years for a qualified nurse to reach parity of pay with childcare workers; if she will instruct the Health Service Executive to honour Labour Court commitments given as far back as 1980 which recommended that nursing staff work no longer than a 35 hour week; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23556/06]
The Irish Nurses Organisation and the Psychiatric Nurses Association are pursuing a number of claims in respect of the pay and conditions of nurses. These include claims seeking a reduction in hours from 39 to 35 per week and a pay increase relative to the pay of the social care worker grade (formerly known as child care workers).
There is no pay relationship between nurses and social care workers. Social care workers are employed in intellectual disability and childcare services in a variety of community and residential settings including High Support Centres. The pay of nurses was determined by the Public Service Benchmarking Body which established new absolute levels of pay for each benchmarked grade and confirmed that no benchmarked grade may receive a further increase as a consequence of the Body's recommendations as they affect any other grade.
In relation to the claim for a 35 hour working week in return for 39 hours pay, it should be noted that a reduction in the hours worked by nurses would have a significant adverse impact on the delivery of care to patients. It is estimated that an additional 4,000 nurses at a cost of €200 million per annum would be required to maintain existing services should this claim be conceded.
These two claims from the nursing unions will be heard by the Labour Court on 20 June.
180 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the financial assistance which is available to allow a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3 attend two weeks respite care in a centre in County Roscommon. [23566/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
181 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the cost for each year since 2002 for laboratory testing being processed in private laboratories for acute hospitals in Cavan and Monaghan; the way in which this testing will be carried out as a result of acute hospital cutbacks proposed in Cavan General Hospital and Monaghan General Hospital; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23567/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
182 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount spent by Monaghan General Hospital and Cavan General Hospital on new items of medical and surgical supplies for each year since 2002; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23568/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
183 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the new development posts on hold for acute hospitals in Counties Cavan and Monaghan, by hospital, which have been placed on hold with immediate effect by the Health Service Executive; the reason these new development posts were agreed on initially; the cost of same; the expected impact on services and patient services; the number of persons to be affected; the expected number of patients who will have to travel outside the region as a result; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23571/06]
185 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the details of all pending posts for hospitals in Cavan and Monaghan, by hospital; the savings expected as a result, which have been placed on hold with immediate effect by the Health Service Executive; the length of time these posts have been vacant; the number of patient services affected as a result; the number of individual patients to be affected; the expected number of patients who will have to travel outside the region as a result; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23573/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 183 and 185 together.
The Deputy's questions relate to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have these matters investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
184 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in circumstances where a home parent who is attending third level education has their childcare allowance stopped at the end of May when college term ends, but to retain the child-care place must continue to make the required payments for the three summer months, the allowance will be paid; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23572/06]
I understand from enquiries made of the Deputy that the parent in question is in receipt of an allowance from the Finglas/Cabra Partnership. My Department has no responsibility in relation to the payment of such allowances.
186 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount spent in each year since 2002 in waste management in Counties Cavan and Monaghan by the Health Service Executive; the amount projected to be spent in 2006; the details and expected costs and savings of the proposed recycling programme in Counties Cavan and Monaghan; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23574/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for waste management in the health service in Counties Cavan and Monaghan.
Accordingly, my Department is requesting the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
187 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of home help hours allocated in County Cavan for each year since 2000; the number of persons benefiting in each year; the budget allocated in each year in County Cavan; if the allocation was used in each year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23575/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
188 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of home help hours allocation in County Monaghan for each year since 2000; the number of persons benefiting in each year; the budget allocated in each year in County Monaghan; if the allocation was used in each year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23576/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
189 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the technical adjustments made to the acute hospital budget for Cavan Monaghan General Hospital and Monaghan General Hospital for each of the past three years to date in 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23577/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
190 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the actions proposed by the directors of nursing in Monaghan General Hospital and Cavan General Hospital to initiate a review of equipment being rented; the items which have been identified; the rentals which will cease immediately; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23578/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act, 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
191 Mr. Crawford asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which she intends to reduce maintenance costs in Cavan General Hospital and Monaghan General Hospital; the expected reduction; the locations where maintenance will be carried out; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23579/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
192 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when she intends to publish her Department’s 2006 business plan; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23580/06]
The Department's annual Business Plan for 2006 will, as in previous years, be made available to the public through the Department's website (www.dohc.ie). It is intended that this will happen in the next few weeks.
193 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her plans to develop new services in the west of Ireland in view of the fact that people in the region have the highest prevalence of diabetes; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23584/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
194 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will expedite an application for a medical card for a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny. [23586/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
195 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 151 of 16 May 2006, when a person (details supplied) in County Clare will be facilitated with home help; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23655/06]
I have been advised that the Health Service Executive (HSE) issued a reply to the Deputy on the 1st June, 2006, in relation to Question No. 151.
196 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the progress regarding the issues raised at meetings between the Health Service Executive and an organisation (details supplied) held in 2005 and 2006; if commitments given in 2005 by the HSE will be acted upon; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23656/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
197 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason for the termination of domiciliary care allowance in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Meath notwithstanding her response to Parliamentary Question No. 138 of 6 April 2006 and further reply from the Health Service Executive parliamentary affairs division. [23663/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
198 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if funding will be restored to an agency (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23664/06]
The funding of the organisation referred to by the Deputy is a matter for the Crisis Pregnancy Agency (CPA), which was established by the Government in 2001 to formulate and implement a strategy to address crisis pregnancy. I understand that the CPA and the organisation concerned are at present in communication regarding the question of continued funding. I do not consider it appropriate that I should make any further comment on the matter.
199 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the position in relation to the Pharmacy Bill; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23670/06]
Government approval was given on 2nd May 2006 to the draft heads and general scheme of the first Pharmacy Bill and these have now been forwarded to the Parliamentary Counsel's office for priority drafting. I have, with Government approval, circulated a copy of this document to the opposition spokespersons on Health. I have also arranged for my officials to provide a copy to the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland and the Irish Pharmaceutical Union.
200 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she has had discussions with the Irish Pharmaceutical Union in relation to allowing their members to give out prescriptive medicine without the need for a written prescription from a general practitioner; if discussions have taken place in this regard; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23671/06]
I have met with the Irish Pharmaceutical Union. Following consideration of the issue of prescribing by other health care professionals in my Department, it is considered that, apart from nurses under certain defined conditions and existing prescribers (doctors and dentists), the necessary regulatory regimes, in particular adequate fitness to practice regimes, are not in place at the present time to permit the extension of prescribing to registered pharmacists. I should also point out that the Government has accepted a recommendation of the Pharmacy Review Group that there should be no beneficial ownership or business interest of any kind between dispensing and prescribing. Pharmacist prescribing would make this recommendation unsustainable.
201 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if there are grants or mobility allowances available for a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3; and if this person will be given the maximum support. [23676/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
202 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if work has started on a house for a person (details supplied) in County Mayo. [23677/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for the provision of the Housing Aid Scheme for the Elderly, on behalf of the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Accordingly, the Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
203 Mr. J. Higgins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will ensure that a society (details supplied) receives sufficient core funding, as outlined in its recent Health Service Executive funding submission, to continue its work and meet future needs of the coeliac community in the coming years. [23701/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
204 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her Department has the means to provide financial assistance to persons seeking to attend for hospital appointments where no public transport or ambulance service is available and the person or persons have to hire taxis to attend; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23705/06]
205 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the proposals her Department has to address the shortfall of ambulance services for persons who due to financial means have no other transport available to them or their loved ones, who are in need of hospital services, clinics and so on; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23706/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 204 and 205 together.
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
My Department is advised by the executive that it intends to conduct a comprehensive review of patient transport arrangements as an element of its 2006 service plan. It is envisaged that this review will examine the service currently delivered nationally and make recommendations for its future development.
206 Ms Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which interest earned from the financial contribution scheme for senior citizens affects means testing for their medical cards; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23707/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy. Under Section 45 of the Health Act 1970, as amended, persons aged 70 or over are statutorily entitled to a medical card regardless of income. In all other cases an assessment is undertaken having regard to applicants' means.
207 Mr. Eoin Ryan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her Department will expand options for opiate addicts beyond the use of methadone; and if so, when options (details supplied) will become available for use here. [23719/06]
212 Ms McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her views on the comparative merit of a product (details supplied) as an alternative to methadone; if she will provide funding if necessary for this use; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23814/06]
Tógfaigh mé Ceisteanna 207 agus 212 le chéile.
I am aware that the drug buprenorphine (trade name Subutex) is being proposed as an alternative to methadone in the treatment of opiate dependent addicts. The current position is that buprenorphine can be prescribed to opiate users by addiction service consultants in specialist drug treatment clinics, where the prescription and dispensing of buprenorphine is tightly controlled.
The Irish Medicines Board has recently amended the authorisation for Buprenorphine to allow it to be prescribed by General Practitioners who have specialist training in its use. My Department is considering the implications of this revised authorisation, especially in view of the diversion potential of Buprenorphine in its current form.
208 Mr. Eoin Ryan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the steps her Department is considering to bring therapeutic options into the treatment of drug addiction here. [23720/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
209 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the assistance which will be given by her Department to a person (details supplied) in County Cork whose birth was never registered and who requires their birth certificate to obtain a passport (details supplied). [23748/06]
An tArd-Chláraitheoir (Registrar General) is the person with statutory responsibility for the administration of the civil registration system. I have made enquiries with an tArd-Chláraitheoir and the position is as set out below. An tArd-Chláraitheoir maintains a national index of births, which is available in the offices of registrars of births, deaths and marriages around the country. Ideally, to search this index, the applicant should know the date and place of birth, forename of the person concerned and the parents' names. However, it may be possible to locate the relevant entry if only some of these details are available.
Where it is established that a birth has not been previously registered, it is possible, under the provisions of the Civil Registration Act, 2004, to effect registration, provided the particulars required by law to be registered are available. In cases where the parents or any other qualified informant with knowledge of the required particulars failed to register a birth within 12 months of the event, the consent of a Superintendent Registrar of births, deaths and marriages is required to effect registration. Where the parents are deceased, or are incapable of acting as qualified informants, or cannot be found, and where no other qualified informant with knowledge of the required particulars can be found, an tArd-Chláraitheoir may cause the birth to be registered on production of adequate evidence of the details of the birth.
I understand that the minimum information required to be entered in the birth register is the forename(s) and the surname, date and exact place of birth, the parents' names, or at least the mother's name, and the marital status of the parents.
In relation to the birth referred to by the Deputy, it cannot be ascertained from the details supplied which registrar was approached concerning this matter and whether the person concerned had sufficient information to locate an entry in the register or had adequate knowledge of the required particulars to effect a registration. As a first step, I suggest that the person concerned contact any registrar directly in writing, requesting to have the birth registered in accordance with Section 20 of the Civil Registration Act, 2004. A list of registrars' offices and contact details may be found at www.groireland.ie concerning this matter.
210 Mr. O’Shea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when she will receive the report of the review by the National Treatment Purchase Fund of the pain management service nationally; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23802/06]
My Department has been advised by the National Treatment Purchase Fund that it is not carrying out a review of pain management services nationally.
211 Mr. Connaughton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if there is financial assistance available to a person (details supplied) in County Galway who has a distinct hearing problem, a hearing aid for which is costing €7,600; if there is financial assistance available towards such costs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23813/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
213 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of speech and language therapists currently serving the public health system in each Health Service Executive area; their location; the status of their appointment; the guiding ratio per head of population; the number of unfilled positions by area; the steps she will take to address the shortage of qualified speech and language therapists; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23815/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
214 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 334 of 26 January, 2005 if the child care report has been finalised; if training issues for preschool inspection staff will arise as a result of the requirements of the revised regulations; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23827/06]
The review of the Child Care (Pre-School Services ) Regulations 1996 and (Amendment) Regulations 1997 has been completed. I expect to be in a position to sign the revised Regulations in the near future. I understand that work is in progress in the Health Service Executive to address training issues for pre-school inspection staff in anticipation of the introduction of the revised Regulations.
215 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of persons who have gone missing from Health Service Executive institutions or whose outpatient psychiatric treatment was interrupted since 1995 to date in 2006 on foot of being reported missing; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23867/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
216 Ms Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that the cancer ward in our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, which is housed in a prefabricated building, does not have air conditioning facilities; and if she will arrange to have this matter addressed as a matter of urgency. [23881/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
217 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will ensure that better quality footwear is provided in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny in view of the fact that they have registered their complaints regarding the footwear provided over a long period of time without a positive response; and if she will expedite a response. [23882/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
218 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to previous parliamentary questions, the action which has been taken to fulfil a High Court agreement in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny who took an action against the South Eastern Health Board and had it resolved by the High Court; her views on the fulfilment or otherwise of that agreement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23883/06]
The Deputy's question relates to human resource management issues within the Health Service Executive. As these are matters for the Executive under the Health Act 2004, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have them investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
219 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of submissions received from service providers in relation to the use of a property at Myshall, County Carlow for the purpose of providing a range of supports and services to those with autism; when a decision will be made in relation to the submissions; if the property is being maintained to an acceptable standard; if a fund is available to implement the project relative to the submissions received; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23884/06]
This property has transferred to the ownership of the Health Service Executive South Eastern Area. Therefore the Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
220 Mr. Deenihan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Kerry will be called for orthodontic treatment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23885/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
221 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when a decision will be made on foot of previous parliamentary questions as to whether financial assistance will be offered towards the cost of occupational therapy sessions for a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23886/06]
I understand from the Health Service Executive that the matter raised by the Deputy in his previous parliamentary question is still ongoing and when completed a reply will issue to him.
222 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she received a submission from the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children regarding a child protection document; her response to same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23887/06]
I understand the Deputy is referring to the recent document circulated by the ISPCC as part of its ‘How Can We Be Sure They're Safe?' campaign. I have only recently received this document and the issues raised in it are being considered by my Office and by the Departments of Education and Science and Justice, Equality and Law Reform. My Office has also asked the Health Service Executive to consider the document in the context of its provision of Child Protection and Family Support Services under the Child Care Act, 1991.
223 Mr. O’Shea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her proposals to provide funding for a project (details supplied) in County Waterford; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23926/06]
My office is currently developing a recreation policy for young people aged 12-18 in conjunction with a number of Government Departments and agencies directly involved in the provision of recreation facilities and programmes for young people. The policy will be available this year. It is intended that the issue of youth cafes will be dealt with in the policy. The management and delivery of health and personal social services are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. My Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the Health Service Executive to arrange to have this proposal examined and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
224 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if there is a cutback in funding towards the provision of medical aids (details supplied) to private nursing homes; if this means that the quantity that each patient is to receive will be reduced; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23927/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
225 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the funding cut back for medical aids (details supplied) only applies in the counties of Galway and Mayo or if it is nationwide; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23928/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
226 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if there is a cutback in the funding for medical aids (details supplied) in every area of the Health Service Executive; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23929/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
227 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her Department have investigated the impact on patient care of the cutback in funds for the provision of medical aids (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23930/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
228 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will introduce a common subvention policy, which would apply nationwide, for nursing homes in every Health Service Executive area in order that they would all receive the same rates of subvention, irrespective of their location; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23931/06]
The Nursing Home (Subvention) Regulations, 1993 are administered by the Health Service Executive. There are currently three rates of subvention payable, i.e. €114.30, €152.40 and €190.50 for the three levels of dependency which are medium, high and maximum. Additional funding of €20 million was provided for the administration of the Nursing Home Subvention Scheme in 2006, bringing the total available budget to €161 million. The €20 million is to support more basic nursing home subventions and reduce waiting lists for enhanced subventions: it is also to bring more consistency to subventions support throughout the country.
The recently published Health (Nursing Homes)(Amendment) Bill 2006 is designed to ensure that the existing subvention scheme for private nursing home care is grounded in primary legislation and to help the HSE to implement the scheme on a standardised basis across the country. In addition, national guidelines on nursing home subvention regulations are currently being developed by the HSE to ensure an even and equitable application of the regulations nationally.
229 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the action which has been taken in relation to the enhanced subvention payment; if same has been stopped by the Health Service Executive; the reasons for this; if same can be reinstated; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23934/06]
The Nursing Home (Subvention) Regulations, 1993 are administered by the Health Service Executive. There are currently three rates of subvention payable, i.e. €114.30, €152.40 and €190.50 for the three levels of dependency which are medium, high and maximum.
The HSE has discretion to pay more than the maximum rate of subvention relative to an individual's level of dependency in a case, for example, where personal funds are exhausted. The application of these provisions in an individual case is a matter for the HSE in the context of meeting increasing demands for subvention, subject to the provisions of the Health Act, 2004. The average rate of subvention paid by the HSE generally exceeds the current approved basic rates. The supports paid by the HSE vary from person to person and region to region, depending on prices for example.
I wish to advise the Deputy that additional funding of €20 million was provided for the administration of the Nursing Home Subvention Scheme in 2006, bringing the total available budget to €161 million. The €20 million is to support more basic nursing home subventions and reduce waiting lists for enhanced subventions: it is also to bring more consistency to subventions support throughout the country.
This Government is committed to developing the various community and home support schemes with a view to enabling older people to remain living in their own homes and communities for as long as possible, in line with their expressed wishes. Additional funding for services for older people amounting to €150 million was allocated in the 2006 Budget. This is the largest ever increase in funding for services for older people and, reflecting the new emphasis on home and day care, almost three quarters of this funding is being committed to community care supports including, among other things, Home Care Packages, the Home Help Service, Sheltered Housing and Day/Respite Care.
230 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the support services available to children with Downs Syndrome; if speech and language therapy is provided to children with Downs Syndrome; the service providers for such services for children residing in Kildare; the earliest age for receipt of such services; if such services are provided to children at preschool, primary and secondary school levels; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23940/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the parliamentary affairs division of the executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
231 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Finance his views on special measures to encourage more wheelchair accessible taxis such as the reduction or elimination of vehicle registration tax on new vehicles being used for this purpose; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23665/06]
I do not have plans at present to reduce or eliminate Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) on taxis. VRT on vehicles helps to broaden the tax base and provides an important source of Exchequer revenue. I am asked regularly to introduce tax reliefs for one purpose or another, but tax reliefs can be an inflexible and inefficient means of addressing policy issues, and to accede to all such requests would lead to an immediate narrowing of the tax base.
232 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Finance if, due to the historical nature and location and other proposed plans and to stop further dereliction and decay, a detailed plan including the Office of Public Works and Dublin City Council will be put together over the next six months to design a plan for the old magazine fort in the Phoenix Park with costings which would include art, community and historical use. [23678/06]
The Office of Public Works undertakes maintenance and repairs to the Magazine Fort, including security works, to preserve the fabric of the Fort and improve security of the premises, on an ongoing basis. The Commissioners are very much open to the suggestion of discussions with Dublin City Council and other appropriate bodies on this issue, with a view to formulation and consideration of realistic proposals for this heritage site in the Phoenix Park.
233 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the provision of a Garda station at Ballyvary, Castlebar County Mayo; when it is expected that same will be released to tender; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23697/06]
Subject to site investigation a Sketch Scheme for a new Garda Station at Ballyvary, County Mayo should be completed by September 2006. It is expected that tenders will be invited early in 2007.
234 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Finance the level of revenue collected from excise duty on off course betting paid into the Exchequer in 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23342/06]
I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the yield to the Exchequer in 2005 from excise duty on off course betting was €45.85 million. The Deputy may be aware that the betting duty rate will be reduced from 2% to 1% with effect from 1 July 2006 and consequently receipts for 2006 are likely to be less than for 2005.
235 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Finance if he has plans for a building owned by the Office of Public Works (details supplied) in County Clare; the reason same has not been renovated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23353/06]
The Commissioners of Public Works propose to provide staff accommodation for the National Parks and Wildlife Services, of the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government at Church Street, Corofin, Co. Clare. The staff are currently working from offices in Ennis, Co. Clare. This project is due to commence in early 2007. In the meantime the Commissioners have placed a contract to secure and enhance the appearance of the building in the short term. This will commence within the next two weeks.
236 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details of the number of claims for relief made in each year from 2000 to 2005 inclusive under section 86 of the Consolidated Capital Acquisitions Act 2003; the value of the properties transferred; the values of the ten largest houses covered by the relief in each of the above years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23364/06]
Section 86 of the Capital Acquisition Tax (CAT) Consolidation Act 2003, which provides an exemption from CAT in relation to certain dwellings, came into effect for gifts or inheritances taken on or after 1 December 1999. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the relevant information available is of the number of claims for this relief which were made in each of the years 2000 to 2005 inclusive. The numbers of such claims were 3 in 2000, 24 in 2001, 13 in 2002, 252 in 2003, 553 in 2004 and 542 in 2005. Data on the values of properties is not captured in the Revenue database by reference to section 86 claims and the information on property values sought by the Deputy, including the values of the ten largest houses, is not accordingly to hand.
The relief under Section 86 was introduced by my predecessor in order to reduce the tax burden faced by individuals on receipt of the family home, by gift or inheritance, irrespective of the circumstances of the family relationship. The relief was introduced at the time in response to growing concern on the part of home owners as to the tax consequence of transferring their family home. In the light of the increasing value of family properties and the variety of family relationships in existence it was decided not to restrict the relief by property value or relationship, but to extend the relief to shared-home situations.
However, in order to restrict the relief to genuine cases and avoid the relief being used as a means of tax avoidance, a lengthy owner-occupancy condition was included in the legislation. In order to qualify for the relief the beneficiary (i.e. the person who receives the gift/inheritance) must have occupied the dwelling house as his or her only or main residence for a period of at least three years prior to the gift or inheritance and must continue to own and reside in it for a period of six years after the date of the gift or inheritance. These conditions of ownership and residence upon inheritance may be waived where the beneficiary requires long-term medical care in a hospital, nursing home or convalescent home. In addition, in order to avail of the relief, the beneficiary must not have an interest in any other property at the time of inheritance. I am confident that these conditions ensure that only genuine cases qualify for the relief.
237 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Finance if the original deed in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Mayo has been obtained; and if so, when the refund in question will be processed. [23532/06]
I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that, in the case referred to by the Deputy, the original deed was required from the Land Registry in order to finalise the refund. The deed was received from the Land Registry on 16 June 2006. It will be processed immediately and a refund can be expected within 10 working days.
238 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare will be furnished with a P21 statement for 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23555/06]
I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that a PAYE Balancing Statement (P21) for 2005 issued to the taxpayer on 15 June 2006 together with a letter outlining an underpayment of tax for that year.
239 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Finance if he has entered contracts for either permanent or temporary accommodation for the decentralisation of the Department of Education and Science to Mullingar, County Westmeath; when he expects these buildings to be occupied; the staffing capacity of such buildings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23582/06]
The Office of Public Works has identified a suitable site in Mullingar town centre and negotiations to acquire it are at an advanced stage. Contracts will only be entered into when all terms have been agreed and legal documentation is to the satisfaction of the Chief State Solicitor. The building, when built will accommodate 305 Department of Education staff and will have sufficient scope to cater for some 10% future expansion if required.
While there has been some examination by the Department of Education, of the feasibility of relocating a number of the posts scheduled to decentralise to temporary accommodation in Mullingar in advance of the main move, no decision has been taken by the Department on this matter to date. At this point in time, a target date of first quarter 2009 is in place for the completion of the construction of the accommodation in Mullingar. This timetable is contingent on a successful outcome to the tender competition which will follow on the call for expressions of interest, on planning permission being obtained and on no delays being experienced during the architectural planning and construction stages.
240 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Finance the expected cost of making the unused part of personal tax credits refundable to those low income earners who are currently on the Revenue Commissioner’s records and do not benefit from the credit. [23654/06]
I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the most recent estimated cost of making the main personal tax credits refundable when they are unused is broadly in the region of €2.1 billion annually. The main category of refund would relate to the employee credit where the annual cost of refunding the unused portion of the credit to income earners with insufficient income to fully absorb it would amount to €1.1 billion approximately. The next categories of refund in order of scale would be the basic personal credit — single, married and widowed — costing €1 billion approximately.
The estimate of €2.1 billion relates only to the cost of extending refundable tax credits to all those on Revenue's tax files. If a refundable tax credit system were to be introduced, one would have to consider those who are not on the tax files, for example, those who are of employable age but not working, including those in social welfare. This would increase the cost significantly.
Apart from the issue of cost, there would be a range of other policy and practical difficulties arising in introducing such a system. I have no plans to introduce refundable tax credits at the present time.
241 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Finance the steps that have been taken by the Office of Public Works to construct a bridge onto Spike Island in Cork Harbour; the estimated cost of such a bridge; the position and design of the bridge; if planning permission will be required to construct the bridge; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23659/06]
The Commissioners of Public Works are currently evaluating the optimum mainland location for the bridge to Spike Island. Discussions are in hand with various parties and have not yet reached a conclusion. The design of the bridge has yet to be completed and the estimated cost will not be available until the design is finalised. A Planning Procedure is required and will be completed under Part 9 of the Planning Regulations.
242 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Finance if the special allowance for public servants who provide a service through Irish is still available; the amount paid out under this allowance in the past three years; the number of public servants involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23694/06]
There are no allowances payable in the civil service or the Defence Forces for the provision of a service through Irish. In the education sector there are two allowances paid to teachers in first and second-level schools who provide a service through Irish. There is an allowance for teaching through Irish paid to teachers in Gaelscoileanna and Scoileanna lán Gaeilge of €1,472 per annum (as at 1 December 2005). A second allowance of €2,849 per annum (as at 1 December 2005) is payable to teachers in the Gaeltacht. Teachers can only receive one of these allowances. The allowances are not paid to other education staff.
Certain local authority officers receive a Gaeltacht allowance under regulations set out in Statutory Instrument 221 of 1966. Under these regulations a local authority may pay an office holder additional remuneration, not exceeding 7.5% of the annual basic salary of the office holder, where her/his duties are performed mainly or entirely in the Gaeltacht and the local authority is satisfied that s/he possesses a sufficient knowledge of the Irish language to enable her or him to perform the duties of the office competently through Irish. The same arrangements apply in the health service as in local authorities.
In the Garda Síochána, a Gaeltacht allowance equal to 7.5% of basic pay is payable to members up to and including Chief Superintendent. The allowance is payable only in areas where Irish is the general medium of speech and where all the members of the Force are proficient in Irish and are required to perform their duties through Irish. I understand that the Gaeltacht allowance payable to the Garda Síochána is the subject of a separate question to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.
Details of the amounts paid out in the last three years and the numbers in receipt of the aforementioned allowances are not readily available. If the Deputy requires this information I suggest that he direct questions to the relevant Ministers.
243 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to plans by the Office of Public Works to carry out further work on the Tolka River in the Blanchardstown area; if his further attention has been drawn to the proposals for flood relief in the vicinity of Damastown, adjacent to Kepak and the N3; if his further attention has been drawn to the concerns of young people using the river for fishing that the proposals to widen the river by eight metres along a three hundred metre stretch will have a devastating effect on the whole ecosystem of the Tolka Valley and will dramatically reduce water levels; if these proposals have been subject to any form of detailed environmental impact assessment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23718/06]
The flood relief works on the River Tolka are, in the main, being undertaken by the Office of Public Works on behalf of the three Local Authorities concerned, Dublin City Council and Meath and Fingal County Councils. The Local Authorities have employed consultants to design the measures outlined in the River Tolka Flooding Study.
It is the understanding of the Commissioners of Public Works that a number of proposals have been put forward by the consultants to the Local Authorities to alleviate the flood risk in this particular area, one of which is to undertake some widening of the channel. The proposals will be considered by the Local Authorities, and will also be the subject of discussions with the landowners concerned and the Office of Public Works, and a preferred option will be chosen. This preferred option will be taken forward by Fingal County Council and exhibited under the Planning and Development Regulations, and will contain an environmental appraisal of any proposed works.
244 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare will be furnished with a copy of their P45 from their former employer; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23724/06]
I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that P45 forms are issued by a person's employer and not by the Revenue Commissioners. It is understood from contact with the Deputy's constituency office that the person concerned requires details of earnings and tax deducted while working for the company concerned. A statement of earnings for 2004 and 2005 in respect of the taxpayer's former employment has issued to her dated 15 June 2006.
245 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Finance if there is an exemption on the payment of stamp duty for people suffering from illness where the purchased second hand house has to be adapted to meet their special needs (details supplied). [23747/06]
Stamp duty is a tax on certain documents, generally legal documents, used in transferring property or in creating rights for the parties concerned. The stamp duty code generally does not provide exemptions based on an individual's particular circumstances and introducing such a provision would represent a significant departure from normal stamp duty rules. However, I have been advised by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government that a scheme of disabled persons grants is operated by local authorities with capital provision from that Department. These grants are designed to meet the needs of persons who are either physically handicapped or are suffering from severe mental handicap or severe mental illness. Where a new dwelling is being bought or built a maximum grant of €12,700 is payable. In the case of adaptation of an existing dwelling, 90% of the approved cost of the works is available up to an effective maximum grant of €20,320. Full details of the scheme and the conditions applicable are available from the local authority in whose area the dwelling is situated.
I would point out that there is no stamp duty on the purchase of new residential property for owner-occupiers where the dwelling is not greater than 125 square metres and complies with certain conditions in relation to building standards. If the property is over 125 square metres, stamp duty is charged on the site value or one quarter of the total value of the property (whichever is the greater).
Stamp duty is a significant contributor to the Exchequer and stamp duty receipts allow for a broader tax base than would otherwise be possible. These receipts form an important element of State revenues which permits Government spending on services such as health and education.
246 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Finance the number of the 450 decentralised jobs promised to County Clare in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Kilrush and Shannon; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23754/06]
I am informed by Revenue that fifty posts are due to relocate to the Office of the Revenue Commissioners in Kilrush and that acceptances have been received for forty-six posts. Four officers serving in Dublin have accepted the offer to decentralise to Kilrush. The Revenue Commissioners are in discussions with the Office of Public Works to finalise matters in relation to their accommodation needs in Kilrush.
247 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Finance the number of the 290 decentralised jobs promised to County Mayo in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Claremorris; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23759/06]
The Office of Public Works is planning to decentralise some 150 staff to Claremorris and the indicative timeframe for the completion of the construction of the new building to accommodate the total decentralised staffing cadre is early 2009.
In the meantime OPW has begun preparations to establish an advance office with a staffing level of the order of 40 for decentralisation in Claremorris early in 2007. The selection of staff for the advance office will in the first instance focus on surplus Department of Agriculture staff in the region who have expressed a preference for decentralisation to Claremorris through the Central Applications Facility (CAF). There are some 170 plus applicants on CAF for Claremorris of which 30 or more are based in Dublin.
248 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Tipperary is entitled to tax credits; if they are liable for tax in 2006 as they started work on week 23 of the tax year. [23878/06]
I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the person in question recently commenced employment and is also in receipt of a taxable pension from the Department of Social and Family Affairs. All available tax credits are currently being utilised in full against this pension and there are therefore no remaining credits available for offset against earnings from the employment. The taxpayer will be liable for tax. The first €271 earned per week is chargeable at 20% with the balance at 42%.
249 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Finance the plans and timeframe for completing the landscaping proposals with boundary fence or walls at an estate (details supplied) in County Kilkenny as part of the River Nore Relief Scheme; if the plans remain the same as those proposed originally; if the plans will be agreed with the residents; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23879/06]
The Local Authority liaised with local residents regarding the type of railing to be installed at both the Dukesmeadow and Bishops Meadow estates in Kilkenny City. Agreement on this issue was reached some time ago and it is anticipated that production and installation of the railings will be completed by Autumn 2006.
250 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Finance if the plans for the work to be carried out at Lacken Weir, Kilkenny will be put on public display as soon as possible; if work on the weir will commence in July or August 2006; if the work planned will be completed in 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23880/06]
It is anticipated that works on the weir will commence in August 2006 and the work planned will be completed in 2006.
251 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the number of the 425 decentralised jobs promised to Cavan town in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23756/06]
The Government's decentralisation programme provides for the relocation of my Department's Headquarters, involving 378 posts, to Cavan at the end of 2009. A total of 171 first preference priority applications were received on the Central Applications Facility (CAF) for the 378 posts in Cavan. Of these, 109 were from people currently working in Dublin. I have recently announced my decision to relocate a small advance party of decentralising civil servants to temporary accommodation in Cavan this August.
252 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the number of the 265 decentralised jobs promised to County Leitrim in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23758/06]
The Government's Decentralisation Programme, announced in December 2003, included proposals to relocate the Central Fisheries Board (CFB), an Agency of my Department, to Carrick-on-Shannon. This proposal involved the decentralisation of the 62 Dublin-based posts in the Board. The Programme also included proposals to decentralise part of the Department of Social and Family Affairs (220 posts) to Carrick-on-Shannon.
The latest information my Department has received from the Public Appointments Service, based on the decentralisation Central Applications Facility (CAF), is that 42 first choice expressions of interest have been received for the CFB posts of which 18 are from persons working in Dublin.
My Department and the CFB have liaised closely with the Office of Public Works (OPW) on the issue of accommodation. OPW has advised that while they have secured an accommodation solution for the Department of Social and Family Affairs, the availability of suitable sites and property in the town for the CFB remains a significant challenge. In this regard, the Decentralisation Implementation Group (DIG) has not yet set out a definitive timetable for the relocation of the Board.
In addition, following a major review of the inland fisheries sector, the Government has decided that a fundamental restructuring of the sector is required. This will involve the establishment of a new National Inland Fisheries Authority (NIFA), which will subsume the executive functions of the existing central and regional fisheries boards. The Government's decentralisation policy will apply to the location of the NIFA's headquarters in the same way that it applies to all other public sector bodies.
253 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the position in relation to the financial situation at An Post. [23375/06]
In relation to An Post's financial situation, the company's recently published accounts for 2005 showed an operational profit of €16.2 million and a group profit of €40.7 million at year end.
254 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the level of broadband availability in the Brannockstown area, Naas, County Kildare; his plans to enhance or extend same to a wider area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23376/06]
The provision of telecommunications services, including broadband, is a matter in the first instance for the private sector companies operating in a fully liberalised market, regulated by the independent Commission for Communications Regulation.
My Department administers a group broadband scheme which is designed to promote the rollout of broadband access through the establishment of sustainable broadband services in towns, villages, rural hinterlands and under-served areas of larger towns on the basis of local and regional authority coordination and community driven initiatives. The most recent call for proposals has now closed and I expect to launch further schemes of this nature shortly.
My Department's website, www.broadband.gov.ie, gives full details of broadband availability in all areas, including ADSL, cable, fibre, satellite and fixed wireless. The website also lists prices of the various service levels on offer and contact details for each service provider.
255 Mr. Lowry asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources when consultants will be appointed to oversee the remediation of the Silvermines tailings pond; the reason for the delay in appointing the consultants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23411/06]
As the Deputy will be aware the Government has agreed to fund, through my Department, the rehabilitation of the abandoned mine sites at Silvermines, County Tipperary and is providing €10.6 million for that purpose. Rehabilitation of Gortmore tailings pond forms part of that project. North Tipperary County Council has agreed to undertake the rehabilitation works, operating as an agent on behalf of my Department.
It is important that appropriate procedures and processes are followed for the procurement of services of this kind and I am pleased to inform the Deputy that consultants have now been selected. I understand from the council that the contract for their engagement will be signed shortly. The functions of the consultants will be to draw up detailed design plans, prepare tender documents, oversee the works, report on progress etc.
256 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his plans to make grant aid available for rural post offices to ensure their computerisation, including the provision of Internet availability to the public; his views on whether this would help address the information divide; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23440/06]
The primary responsibility for the development of the post office network rests with An Post. The current level of automated coverage is considered by An Post to be extremely comprehensive by any objective standard and this level of coverage makes it difficult to justify on either customer-service or economic grounds the extension of automation to all offices, regardless of their location or business volumes.
Nevertheless, I have asked An Post to undertake a pilot project to automate a selected number of non-automated offices to gauge the effect on new business. Ten post offices have been automated as part of this project and a marketing campaign is under way in the localities where the pilot projects are being undertaken to support the initiative. Upon completion of the pilot, An Post will assess and evaluate the results of the project and the impact of automation on business.
With regard to the provision of internet availability to the public, there are no plans by An Post, at this point, to provide this service to the public through the rural post office network. However, I would like to point out that, with the roll out of eGovernment services, the automated element of the post office network is ideally placed to capitalise on opportunities arising in this space, especially in the area of ePayments.
A core objective for An Post continues to be the retention of access to post office services in as many locations as possible, in the manner which best meets customer needs, whether services are provided via post offices, postal agencies or the postpoint network.
257 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his plans to publish a strategy for the rural post office network; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23441/06]
The development and continued viability of An Post and the post office network is, in the first instance, a matter for the board and management of An Post.
This Government and the Board of An Post are committed to the objective of ensuring the continuation of a viable and sustainable nationwide post office network as set out in the Programme for Government. The challenge for all stakeholders in An Post is to generate sufficient profitable business to maintain the network at its current size.
I have asked the company to ensure that any strategy for the development of the company should ensure the long term viability of the post office network and in this light, An Post is currently working on a financial services initiative which could see the development and expansion of the range of financial services that it can deliver through its network of post offices.
Following recent Government approval the board and management of An Post have now commenced exclusive negotiations with the company's preferred partner, Fortis, to expand the range of retail financial services available through the post office network with a view to increasing the levels of post office business. If the initiative proves to be successful, it could lead to a significant increase in post office business and contribute to the enhanced viability of the network.
258 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the amount of funding obtained by Ireland from the European Union for coastal erosion over the past five years throughout the country; and the breakdown by county of national expenditure for coastal erosion over the same period. [23453/06]
Funding for Coast Protection is provided under the Coast Protection Measure of the National development Plan 2000-2006. Expenditure on coastal protection since 2000 is not funded by the European Union. Details of expenditure under this Department's Coastal Protection Programmes in the years 2000-2005 are set out below.
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
County Louth |
||
|
Annagassan |
Phase 2 Protection Scheme |
118,299.45 |
|
County Dublin |
||
|
Vico Road |
Cliff Protection Works |
50,832.96 |
|
Bull Island |
Study of effects of breaching the causeway |
55,924.34 |
|
County Wicklow |
||
|
Bray |
Phase 2 & Remedial Works |
2,673,444.56 |
|
County Wexford |
||
|
Rosslare |
Beach Protection |
75,675.31 |
|
Rosslare |
Maintenance |
19,656.33 |
|
Cullenstown |
Revetment Works & training walls |
145,638.96 |
|
County Waterford |
||
|
Tramore |
Promenade wall strengthening |
61,492.39 |
|
Cunnigar |
Design of Protection Works |
35,400.95 |
|
County Kerry |
||
|
Rossbeigh |
Consultancy Study |
50,789.52 |
|
Waterville |
Upgrade & Road Protection |
107,424.11 |
|
Dingle-Castlemaine Road |
Rock armour |
2,840,235.21 |
|
County Clare |
||
|
Quilty |
Protection Scheme |
269,551.43 |
|
Seafield |
Dune Protection Works |
27,299.37 |
|
Ballyvaughan |
Road Protection Works |
155,645.76 |
|
County Galway |
||
|
Auginish Island |
Causeway Protection Works |
78,088.89 |
|
Cleggan |
Beach Road Protection |
131,493.73 |
|
Tawin Island |
Beach Road Protection |
66,026.38 |
|
Gorteen Beach |
Beach Protection |
64,756.64 |
|
Renville |
Coast Protection to public recreation area |
67,043.44 |
|
Clifden Beach |
Coast Protection to public recreation area |
127,608.68 |
|
Inishmore Island |
Beach Road |
76,184.29 |
|
Oranmore/Mweeloon |
Road Protection Works |
79,450.05 |
|
County Mayo |
||
|
Achill |
Dune Protection Works |
42,451.15 |
|
Elly Bay |
Seawall Repairs/Dune Protection |
136,145.24 |
|
Bertra Beach |
Dune Protection Works |
63,733.23 |
|
Fahy-Ballycroy |
Sea outfall renewal and Coast Protection |
78,857.08 |
|
Bundoola Belmullet |
Repairs to seawall |
26,858.77 |
|
Keel Beach |
Dune Protection works |
24,152.96 |
|
County Sligo |
||
|
Strandhill |
Dune Protection works |
23,236.21 |
|
Mullaghmore |
Road Protection works |
150,652.38 |
|
Pollacheeney |
Protection Works |
91,421.14 |
|
County Donegal |
||
|
Bundoran |
Road/Cliff Protection |
394,897.43 |
|
Kerrykeel |
Repairs to sea wall |
82,171.10 |
|
Mountcharles |
Rock armouring |
134,797.34 |
|
Rye, Rathmullen |
Sea wall rock armouring |
192,569.75 |
|
Inver |
Coast Protection |
34,324.83 |
|
General |
||
|
Coastal Survey |
45,654.69 |
|
|
GIS System/Maintenance |
224,909.00 |
|
|
Wave Buoys |
17,300.46 |
|
|
Pilot Project for dissemination |
3802.55 |
|
|
Research Startup |
5,743.77 |
|
|
Coastal Survey, County Louth |
2,343.04 |
|
|
GIS initial setup |
224.91 |
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
County Donegal |
||
|
Drung, Quigley’s Pt |
Rock Armour |
276,870.20 |
|
Keadue, Kincasslagh |
Seawall |
42,329.07 |
|
Mountcharles |
Road Protection Works |
311,247.39 |
|
Mahery, Dungloe |
Road Protection Works |
31,549.84 |
|
Kerrykiel, Rossakill |
Road Protection Works |
157,398.00 |
|
Kerrykeel |
Sea Wall Repairs |
2,194.11 |
|
Inver |
Concrete Slab & Low Level Wall |
48,248.78 |
|
Carrickarory |
Repointing existing Seawall |
4,235.85 |
|
Bundoran |
Shorline Protection |
144,666.73 |
|
Rye, Rathmullan |
Sea Wall |
7,309.88 |
|
County Sligo |
||
|
Strandhill |
Slipway |
19,046.07 |
|
Strandhill |
Shoreline Protection |
93,325.75 |
|
Mullaghmore |
Road Protection Wks. |
514,062.35 |
|
Pollacheeny |
Study & Detailed Design |
39,488.85 |
|
County Mayo |
||
|
Westport/Bertra |
Dune Protection |
38,092.14 |
|
Carrowmore Beach |
Dune Protection |
25,394.76 |
|
Roonagh, Louisburg |
Road Protection Works |
38,092.14 |
|
Belmullet Town |
Repair Sea Walls |
126,973.81 |
|
Mulranny Causeway |
Protection Works |
114,276.43 |
|
Bundoola, Belmullet |
Repairs to Seawall |
100,114.61 |
|
Claggan Island |
Dune Protection Works |
71,678.70 |
|
Elly Bay |
Seawall Repairs & Dune Protection |
102,231.41 |
|
County Galway |
||
|
Auginish Island |
Causeway Protection |
50,789.52 |
|
Inishboffin |
Protection Works to South facing Shore |
126,973.81 |
|
Inishboffin |
Erosion Study of South facing shore |
37,807.76 |
|
Renvyle |
Road Protection |
63,486.90 |
|
Inishmore |
Airstrip Protection |
8,281.87 |
|
Ballyconnelly |
Road Protection Works |
114,276.43 |
|
Roundstone Pier |
Study |
36,822.40 |
|
County Louth |
||
|
Annagassan |
Phase 2 Protection Works |
199,877.46 |
|
Salterstown |
Protection Works |
44,606.24 |
|
County Dublin |
||
|
Bull Island |
Study |
85,174.03 |
|
County Wicklow |
||
|
Bray |
Phase 2 Coast Protection |
863,564.76 |
|
Bray |
Remedial Works/Extension of harbour wall |
1,056,175.00 |
|
Bray |
Coast Protection Scheme |
26.70 |
|
County Wexford |
||
|
Courtown |
Revetment Works |
115,866.24 |
|
Cullenstown |
Revetment Works |
914,150.47 |
|
Rosslare Strand |
Study of Nth end of spit |
69,332.75 |
|
Rosslare Strand |
Maintenance |
22,771.86 |
|
Rosslare Strand |
Revetment Works |
95,230.36 |
|
Rosslare Strand |
New Scheme |
251.71 |
|
County Waterford |
||
|
Ballyvoile |
Study of Road Protection Works |
41,978.67 |
|
Tramore |
Promenade Wall Strengthening |
1,173,388.05 |
|
County Cork |
||
|
Durris to Ahakista |
Road Protection Works |
88,419.48 |
|
Youghal |
Preparation of Tender and Planning |
25,394.76 |
|
Youghal |
Sea Wall Repairs |
38,092.14 |
|
County Kerry |
||
|
R561 Dingle to Castlemaine |
Revetment Works |
2,772,860.11 |
|
County Clare |
||
|
Quilty |
Protection Scheme |
98,420.14 |
|
Clahanes Liscannor |
Concrete Wall |
233,449.22 |
|
Rinvalla Bay |
Road Protection Works |
321,239.56 |
|
Aughinish Island |
Causeway Protection Works |
52,368.37 |
|
General |
||
|
Wave Buoys |
2,989.61 |
|
|
Aerial Survey Carnsore to Killiney |
63,281.12 |
|
|
GIS Maintenance |
2,384.52 |
|
|
Coastal Surveys 2001 |
10,240.44 |
|
|
GIS Maintenance & Development |
33,284.28 |
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
Strandhill, County Sligo |
Shoreline Protection |
710,000 |
|
Mullaghmore, County Sligo |
Road Protection |
89,715 |
|
Keadew, Kincaslagh, County Donegal |
Sea Wall |
245,300 |
|
Maghery, Dungloe, County Donegal |
Road Protection |
109,774 |
|
Mountcharles, County Donegal |
Road Protection |
12,333 |
|
Kerrykeel, County Donegal |
Road Protection |
1,574 |
|
Carrickaroary, County Donegal |
Repointing Existing Sea Wall |
22,274 |
|
Drung, Quigley’s Point, County Donegal |
Rock Armour |
15,476 |
|
Lagg, Malin Head, County Donegal |
Study of Coastal Processes |
31,058 |
|
Inver, County Donegal |
Protection Works |
1,322 |
|
Inisboffin, County Galway |
Protection Works to South Facing Shore |
190,500 |
|
Salin to Silverstrand, County Galway |
Study |
106,441 |
|
Tawin Island, County Galway |
Road Protection |
71,885 |
|
Claggan Island, County Mayo |
Repair Works |
33,160 |
|
Bunnafolly, County Mayo |
Protection Works |
36,144 |
|
Lacken, County Mayo |
Cliff/Road Study |
30,000 |
|
Elly Bay, County Mayo |
Installation of ECAB Units |
198,144 |
|
Bellurgan, County Louth |
Embankment Re-instatement |
226,869 |
|
Louth Coastline |
Survey of Coastline |
10,091 |
|
Whitestown, County Louth |
Rock Armour Protection |
49,781 |
|
Blackrock, County Louth |
Seawall Protection |
43,317 |
|
Salterstown, County Louth |
Repairs & Protection to Road Verge |
524,823 |
|
Seapoint, County Louth |
Dune Protection Works |
100,000 |
|
Blackrock to Dundalk, County Louth |
Study |
48,400 |
|
Shelling Hill/Gyles Quay, County Louth |
Protection Works |
45,892 |
|
Carlingford Harbour, County Louth |
Repairs |
831 |
|
Annagassan Harbour, County Louth |
Protection Works |
34,758 |
|
Tramore, County Waterford |
Promenade Refurbishment |
304,260 |
|
Cunnigar, County Waterford |
Rock Revetment |
337,628 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Study of North End of Spit |
152,580 |
|
Courtown, County Wexford |
Design of Breakwater |
178,414 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Revetment Works |
103,795 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Maintenance |
13,292 |
|
Cahore, County Wexford |
Rock Groynes & Beach Nourishment |
57,289 |
|
Ballyconnigar, County Wexford |
Rock Revetment |
29,000 |
|
Garretstown, County Cork |
Road Protection Works |
279,013 |
|
Durris to Ahakista, County Cork |
Road Protection Works |
180,239 |
|
Warren, County Cork |
Beach Groynes |
150,000 |
|
Youghal, County Cork |
Planning Stage |
50,000 |
|
Ballyheigue/Inch, County Kerry |
Road Protection Works |
552,325 |
|
Knightstown, County Kerry |
Protection Works |
50,475 |
|
Carrigaholt, County Clare |
Protection Works |
61,196 |
|
Shanganagh, County Dublin |
Study |
9,977 |
|
Bray, County Wicklow |
Pier Repair Works |
586,992 |
|
Dunlaoghaire, County Dublin |
Vico Road Revetment |
283,624 |
|
Portmarnock, County Dublin |
Dune Protection Works |
49,984 |
|
Coastal Study |
Consultancy Study |
2,955 |
|
Coastal Surveys |
General Coastal & Project Related |
4,212 |
|
GIS System |
Customisation, Maintenance & Training |
9,537 |
|
Wave Buoys |
Maintenance & Deployment |
7,391 |
|
Beach Monitoring |
Monitoring of Nourished Beach, Bray |
5,816 |
|
East Coast |
Aerial Survey — Carnsore to Killiney |
21,785 |
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
Elly Bay, County Mayo |
Installation of ECAB Units |
92,244 |
|
Devlin, County Mayo |
Rock Armour, Retaining Wall |
80,000 |
|
Bellurgan, County Louth |
Embankment Reinstatement |
7,648 |
|
Salterstown, County Louth |
Repairs & Protection of Road Verge |
120,000 |
|
Carlingford Harbour, County Louth |
Damaged Navigational Light |
3,004 |
|
Shore Road, Dundalk, County Louth |
Sea Defence Embankment |
78,000 |
|
Blackrock, County Louth |
Rock Armour |
54,540 |
|
Annagassan, County Louth |
Protection Works |
8,942 |
|
Cruisetown, County Louth |
Extend coastal protection |
80,984 |
|
Salterstown Pier, County Louth |
Protection Works |
30,037 |
|
Drung, Quigleys Pt., County Donegal |
Road Protection Works |
53,703.45 |
|
Meenacross, County Donegal |
Rebuild Portion of Wall, Repoint Wall |
20,000 |
|
Muckross, County Donegal |
Rock Armour Revetment to Protect Public Road |
80,000 |
|
Carrigaholt Castle, County Clare |
Protection Works to National Monument |
43,549 |
|
Cappagh, County Clare |
Road Protection Works |
99,600 |
|
Carrigaholt, County Clare |
Reconstruction of Rock Revetment |
29,004 |
|
Doonbeg, County Clare |
Rock Armour |
22,682 |
|
Liscannor, County Clare |
Rock Armour |
18,280.70 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Study |
11,488 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Capital Works |
19,054 |
|
Rosslare Strand, County Wexford |
Maintenance |
7,957 |
|
Rosslare, County Wexford |
New Scheme |
207 |
|
Cahore, Wexford |
Rock Groynes, Beach Nourishment |
57,715.22 |
|
Rosslare, County Wexford |
Revetment Works |
37,094.68 |
|
Ballyconnigar, County Wexford |
Rock Revetment |
29,652 |
|
Warren Strand, County Cork |
Beach Groynes |
160,000 |
|
Youghal, County Cork |
Coastal Protection Phase, Prep Contract Docs |
30,250 |
|
Warren Strand, County Cork |
Complete Phase 2 Groyne |
55,497.74 |
|
Tramore, County Waterford |
Promenade Refurbishment |
23,429.73 |
|
Cunnigar, County Waterford |
Balance of 2001 Grant |
1,339 |
|
Dublin City Council, Dublin |
Risk Assessment Study |
484,890 |
|
Ballyheigue, County Kerry |
Road Protection Works |
200,000 |
|
Ballyheigue, County Kerry |
Complete Phase 1 |
300,000 |
|
Ventry, County Kerry |
Coastal Protection Works |
29,047.31 |
|
Kenmare, County Kerry |
Sea Wall |
15,026.36 |
|
Brittas Bay, County Wicklow |
Update Study, Extension of Scheme |
49,802.39 |
|
Burrow, Portrane, Fingal |
Repairs to Embankment, etc. |
10,000 |
|
Portmarnock to Malahide Fingal |
Repairs to Coastal Walkway |
5,000 |
|
Coast Protection Strategy Study |
370,471 |
|
|
GIS System |
Maintenance and Customisation |
26,726 |
|
Bray |
Beach Monitoring |
4,646 |
|
Basic Research Tide Gauge |
Review Statistical Analyses |
19,800 |
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
Louth |
||
|
Bellurgan |
Erosion (Road) |
10,968.45 |
|
Annagassan, Strand Road |
Concrete undepinning and rock armour |
149,998.85 |
|
Salterstown |
County road erosion to road edge |
70,450.00 |
|
Drogheda |
Erosion of R167 |
38,648.00 |
|
Cooley (Whitetown/Ballagan) |
Replacement of rock armour |
58,498.00 |
|
Meath |
||
|
Laytown |
Laytown Study |
40,000.00 |
|
Galway |
||
|
Inisboffin |
Emergency work |
193,243.82 |
|
Kerry |
||
|
Kilfinora |
Revetment works |
156,389.99 |
|
Baile an Ruinnaig, Burial Place |
Provision of rock armour |
117,453.77 |
|
Dublin |
||
|
Dún Laoghaire Rathdown CC |
Coastal Survey |
25,652.00 |
|
Corbawn Lane |
Contract documents etc; |
41,140.00 |
|
Cork |
||
|
Warren |
Coast protection works |
190,437.89 |
|
Youghal |
Phase 1 |
505,945.17 |
|
Waterford |
||
|
Helvic |
Emergency works and diving survey |
94,537.01 |
|
Wexford |
||
|
Courtown |
Design of breakwater etc; |
490,938.77 |
|
Curracloe |
Dune protection |
41,374.56 |
|
Rosslare Maintenance |
Beach and Compound Maintenance work |
83,198.63 |
|
Wicklow |
||
|
Greystones |
Site Investigation |
70,000.00 |
|
General |
Coastal Protection Strategy Study |
174,220.62 |
|
GIS System |
Maintenance and Custimisation |
31,389.95 |
|
Wave Buoy |
Maintenance and Deployment |
45,188.39 |
|
Beach Monitoring |
Monitoring of Nourished Beach at Bray |
16,992.27 |
|
Basic Research Tide Gauge |
Installation of gauge for monitoring mean sea level |
11,335.64 |
|
Coastal Video Survey |
Video Survey of National Coastline |
30,991.50 |
|
Location |
Project |
Total cost |
|
€ |
||
|
Donegal |
||
|
Curransport, Meenlaragh |
Protection works |
70,000.00 |
|
Gweebarra Bends |
Protection to Sea Wall |
40,000.00 |
|
Inver Village |
Extension to protection wall |
70,000.00 |
|
Lagg |
Beach Protection works |
60,000.00 |
|
Moville |
Green amenity area and path |
6,000.00 |
|
Rosbeg |
Protection works |
20,000.00 |
|
Rye, Rathmullen |
Protection works |
140,000.00 |
|
Aranmore |
Protection works |
85,000.00 |
|
Maghery |
Protection works |
100,000.00 |
|
Muckross |
Protection works |
25,000.00 |
|
Louth |
||
|
Annagassan |
Strand Road |
37,836.36 |
|
Salterstown |
Road Protection works |
64,258.00 |
|
Port Beach |
Study |
15,004.00 |
|
Mayo |
||
|
Bertra Beach, Westport |
Protection Works |
100,000.00 |
|
Sligo |
||
|
Mullaghmore |
Dune Management Scheme |
15,121.00 |
|
Rathlee |
Coast Protection Works |
41,803.55 |
|
Galway |
||
|
Innishboffin |
Road protection Works, Design, Tenders, etc; |
232,930.55 |
|
Innishboffin |
Road Protection Works |
200,000.00 |
|
Cork |
||
|
Gyleen |
Village Protection Works |
198,071.87 |
|
Youghal |
Phase 1 completion |
310,523.33 |
|
Clare |
||
|
Ross/Kilbaha |
Rock gabions & Rock revetment |
118,650.00 |
|
Carrigaholt |
Road Protection Works |
72,310.00 |
|
Kerry |
||
|
Killelan Caherciveen |
Road Protection Works |
20,000.00 |
|
Baile an Rannaig |
Provision of rock armour |
2,625.17 |
|
Reen Ballinskelligs |
Protection works |
20,000.00 |
|
Maherees |
Road Protection Works |
99,761.97 |
|
Kilfenora |
Revetment Works |
28,133.49 |
|
Dublin City Council |
||
|
Merrion Gates |
Provide banking/ramping to seal opening |
48,514.79 |
|
Clontarf Promenade |
Flood Defences Detailed Design |
40,293.00 |
|
Spencer Dock |
Sea Surge Defence Barrier |
161,192.21 |
|
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown |
||
|
Killiney |
Repairs to Beach Gabions |
145,700.00 |
|
Corbawn/Shankill |
Repairs to Beach Access |
39,930.00 |
|
Waterford |
||
|
Bunmahon |
Protection Works/Scheme Design |
23,769.69 |
|
Cunnigar, Dungarvan |
Protection Scheme/Design |
92,658.10 |
|
Wexford |
||
|
Cahore |
Continuation of Revetment works |
22,155.82 |
|
Kilpatrick |
Soft engineering Works to Beach |
20,361.90 |
|
Rosslare |
Soft Engineering Works to Beach |
13,491.85 |
|
Wicklow |
||
|
Arklow |
South Beach |
59,141.53 |
|
Bray to Greystones |
Cliff path works |
92,887.00 |
|
Bray |
Promenade flood prevention wall at Bray |
74,000.00 |
|
General |
||
|
Coastal Protection |
Strategy Study |
132,816.27 |
|
GIS System |
Customisation, maintenance and training |
18,929.16 |
|
Wave Buoys |
Maintenance and Deployment |
8,556.06 |
|
Beach Monitoring |
Monitoring of nourished beach at Bray, County Wicklow |
4,646.40 |
|
Tide Gauge |
Installation of gauge for monitoring mean sea level |
19,723.00 |
|
Detailed survey of selected coastal areas |
41,881.85 |
|
|
Rosslare |
Maintenance |
14,832.08 |
259 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the number of civil servants who have requested a place in Cavan under the decentralisation programme; if that number includes transfers from the Department of Agriculture and Food offices in Cavan; if so, the number of transfers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23529/06]
A total of 153 civil servants expressed a first place priority Central Applications Facility (CAF) application to decentralise with my Department to Cavan. Included in this figure are 19 first preference priority CAF applicants from civil servants working in the Department of Agriculture and Food's offices in Cavan.
260 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if, in view of the indications of continuing significant levels of consumer dissatisfaction with Internet service providers levels of service and the conclusion of his Department in its January 2006 discussion paper, Broadband Demand, he will consider consumer rights legislation specific to the telecommunications and broadband sector empowering and giving rights to consumers in view of the prevalence of dominance and the absence of competition in the sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23530/06]
I have no plans for consumer legislation specific to the telecoms area and have no function in this area. The area of consumer protection falls within the remit of my colleague the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment and the Office of the Director of Consumer Affairs.
In addition, the Deputy may be aware that the objectives of the Commission for Communications Regulation, ComReg, in relation to the provision of electronic communications networks, electronic communications services and associated facilities, include both the promotion of competition and the promotion of the interests of users within the European Communities. ComReg is independent in the exercise of its functions.
261 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the stage of development and future plans during 2006 and 2007 for the EU Fisheries Central Centre at Vigo, Spain; the relationship of this centre with the Irish fisheries control authorities in Haulbowline, the Navy and the proposed new Irish Fisheries Protection Authority. [23562/06]
The Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) was established by Council Regulation No. 768/2005 of 26 April 2005. The CFCA will coordinate fisheries control and inspection activities by Member States through the establishment of Joint Deployment Plans agreed in consultation with the Member States concerned, where a specific monitoring programme has been agreed at EU level and on the basis of control resources made available to it by Member States. The Member States remain responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The establishment of the Irish Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority will not change the relationship between the Irish control authorities and the CFCA.
Since then, Council Regulation work has been progressing on the development of the CFCA. An administrative board has been established comprising representatives of the Commission and of each Member State and the candidate countries of Romania and Bulgaria. At a meeting of the administrative board in Vigo last week, Mr. Harm Koster was appointed as Executive Director of the CFCA. Implementing rules under the CFP governing inspections and the reporting of infringements were agreed in May 2006. The CFCA is to commence its operations in Brussels before moving to Vigo in early 2008.
262 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the capital investment by the State in fishery harbours here under the port infrastructure improvement programme for each of the years 2000 to date in 2006. [23563/06]
The funding available to the Department under the Port Infrastructure Improvement Programme of the National Development Plan 2000-2006 is directed at projects that improve infrastructure and facilities (including ice plants, landing and storage facilities) at key strategic fishery harbours and the construction and improvement of berthage and related facilities at smaller harbours and landing places, with a key role in maintaining jobs in fishing, aquaculture and ancillary activities. Expenditure details for the years 2000-2005 are set out in the table. Funding of €22.5 million is available for the Fishery Harbours Development Programme in 2006, which is now fully allocated.
|
Year |
DCMNR |
Local Authority |
Total |
|
€ Million |
€ Million |
€ Million |
|
|
2000 |
12.719 |
0.639 |
13.358 |
|
2001 |
12.912 |
1.468 |
14.380 |
|
2002 |
27.508 |
2.408 |
29.916 |
|
2003 |
29.163 |
0.631 |
29.794 |
|
2004 |
13.517 |
0.434 |
13.951 |
|
2005 |
17.048 |
1.887 |
18.935 |
|
Totals |
112.867 |
7.467 |
120.334 |
263 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the key targets, components and sources of funding for the Marine Research and Innovation Strategy for 2007 to 2013. [23564/06]
The Marine Institute has recently completed a draft Marine Knowledge, Research and Innovation Strategy for Ireland for the period 2007-2013. The strategy is designed to underpin the development of the marine sector for the coming years and aims to ensure that Ireland fully maximises the economic, social and environmental contribution of its marine resources.
It is my intention to bring the report to Government in the near future and to have it published as soon as possible thereafter. As the Deputy will appreciate, until such time as the report is presented to Government, I am not in a position to comment further.
264 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his investment and product targets and plans for the development of the aquaculture industry here during the period of the next National Development Plan to 2013; his targets for production of fish in tonnes; his views on the key species which should be developed; the levels of employment which may be obtained; and his further plans for protection of the environment as the industry develops. [23569/06]
The central strategic goal of the new NDP 2007- 2013 must be to ensure the long term economic, social and environmental sustainability of the seafood industry as a whole, thus maintaining the value of its activity to the coastal and rural communities who rely upon it, and to the economy as a whole.
With regard to future priorities for aquaculture under the NDP 2007- 2013, given that Ireland is no longer a low cost economy, constant improvement in efficiency is required of this sector for it to remain competitive. Key to achieving this will be the application of technological innovation to further develop environmentally sustainable techniques, including organic farming, and achieve successful diversification into new species, while ensuring the highest international quality standards are met.
Detailed priorities for aquaculture will be defined as part of the development of the overall programme for investment in the seafood sector under the new NDP, taking into account the final form of the European Fisheries Fund, which was agreed at the EU Fisheries Council on 19 June. In order to inform this process, I have proposed plans for the development of a comprehensive strategy to take the sector forward and inform funding priorities for the 2007-2013 period. The development of this strategy will involve a number of key elements including, the appointment of an independent leader of the strategy team, and the holding of regional meetings to hear views from all parts of the sector. There will also be a forum which will bring together industry representatives, key sectoral players and experts from the food and related sectors.
265 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the situation with regard to the establishment of the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority; the expected cost of the Authority in 2006 and 2007; the personnel numbers and skills of the Authority; the maritime and other resources of the Authority; the proposed location of the Authority; and if should be based in a national fisheries harbour. [23570/06]
The establishment of the Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority is provided for in the Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Act 2006. In accordance with the legislation existing staff in my Department assigned to the Seafood Control Division will transfer to the new authority. In addition sanction is in place for 45 additional posts and a significant recruitment drive is taking place at present. The Authority will be located in Clonakilty, County Cork, as will the seafood functions of my Department which are relocating there as part of the Government's decentralisation plans. The budget for the new Authority has yet to be settled.
266 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if it is intended to allow Irish fishing boats to fish in the waters of Western Sahara following the agreement between the EU and Morocco despite the fact that the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara has been found to be illegal by the International Court of Justice. [23588/06]
Ireland has been a firm supporter of the right to self-determination of the people of the Western Sahara, and the Government remains firmly committed to this principle.
At the Fisheries Council in May 2006 which ratified the agreement, Ireland made the following statement to the Council setting down its position on the Fisheries agreement in relation to the Western Sahara situation: Ireland supports the conclusion of the Fisheries partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco on the basis that it does not prejudice the long-standing position of the EU on the status of the Western Sahara. The EU continues to support the efforts of the UN Secretary General to encourage a negotiated solution which will allow the people of the Western Sahara to exercise their right to self-determination. Ireland emphasises the importance of the future dialogue within the EU-Morocco Joint Committee foreseen under this agreement. It is essential that the Joint Committee make use of all instruments under the Agreement to ensure that the Agreement is implemented to the benefit of all the people concerned and in accordance with the principles of international law. Under the terms of the Regulation, Ireland was allocated 2,500 tonnes of pelagic fish per annum. The conditions in place for Irish fishing boats will be the same as will apply to all EU fishing boats under the terms of the agreement.
267 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his views on including small wind turbines which are used for home water heating in the Sustainable Energy Ireland’s greener homes grant programme in view of the fact that wind is one of our best renewable energy resources and that there are no issues about grid connection as small wind turbines are directly connected to a water heater; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23798/06]
I have asked Sustainable Energy Ireland to examine the issue of small wind turbines that are directly connected to water heaters in the overall context of the Greener Homes Scheme.
268 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his views on the announcement in Northern Ireland that full broadband access will be made available to rural and remote communities in the immediate term; and if he will make a statement on the roll-out of broadband in this jurisdiction. [23839/06]
The telecommunications sectors in both jurisdictions on the island of Ireland are fully liberalised but regulated, by ComReg in the Republic and by OFCOM in Northern Ireland. While private sector broadband infrastructure is currently more extensive in Northern Ireland and the percentage of broadband subscribers is higher, the gap continues to narrow. My Department and Northern Ireland's Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment are jointly implementing the €7.5 million, EU supported, INTERREG IIIa initiative, which is funding a number of projects to improve broadband connectivity in border areas.
Broadband subscriber numbers have increased hugely in the last year. Almost 140,000 new broadband subscribers were added in 2005, a growth rate of 103% in 2005. This compares to 100,000 new broadband subscribers in 2004. The latest ComReg quarterly report states there are 270,700 broadband subscribers as of end-2005. This is equivalent to 6.6% of the population. ComReg estimate that there are 320,000 subscribers to the end of the first quarter of 2006.
Home Internet penetration figures currently stand at 18.7% of households. DSL dominates the Irish broadband market (75% market share). However, Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) and cable are growing very strongly, albeit from a small base.
The Government is addressing the infrastructure deficit in the regions by building high-speed, open-access Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs) in 120 towns and cities nationwide. Phase One of this Programme has delivered fibre optic networks to 27 towns and cities throughout the country.
This Programme has been extended to over 90 towns in various locations nationwide. It is expected that these MANs will be completed during 2006 and 2007. These networks will allow the private sector to offer world-class broadband services at competitive costs.
My Department also offers funding assistance for smaller towns and rural communities through the County and Group Broadband Scheme. The scheme is technology-neutral, allowing the community to select the most suitable broadband delivery platform for the area. To date, over 150 projects have been approved for funding under this Programme.
Furthermore, a joint industry/Government fund of €18 million has been established for the Broadband for Schools Programme, which should provide every school in the country with broadband in 2006. This is a crucial strand in the strategy of integrating ICT into teaching and learning, and my Department's wider vision of promoting the use of broadband technologies in local communities around the country. The installation phase is now almost complete, with over 90% of all schools broadband enabled.
Today there are 68 broadband providers, a mixture of DSL, fixed wireless, satellite and cable, offering almost 300 different types of broadband products. Wireless broadband technology is improving rapidly, and the lowering of equipment prices has made this technology much more attractive of late especially in rural areas that cannot obtain ADSL connectivity, and the development of Wi-Max offers considerable potential in the future.
269 Mr. Walsh asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will approve a grant towards improvement works to a pier (details supplied) in County Cork. [23857/06]
Garnish Pier is owned by Cork County Council and responsibility for its repair and maintenance rests with the local authority in the first instance. Cork County Council submitted a proposal to the Department of Communications Marine and Natural Resources for works at Garnish Pier at an estimated cost of €750,000. Last year, under the Small Fishery Harbours Programme, the Department allocated funding of €45,000 to Cork County Council towards pier improvement works at Garnish Pier costing a total of €60,000.
Garnish Pier is in an area coming within the scope of the CLÁR Programme. However, the current project cannot be considered for funding under the coastal development measure of that Programme, which is co-funded between the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and this Department. One of the criteria for grant aid under this scheme is that only projects costing up to a maximum of €200,000 per project are funded.
There was no funding available from the Department of Communications Marine and Natural Resources in 2006 for this project. The question of providing funding in the post 2006 period will be considered in the context of the amount of the funding available for works at fishery harbours generally and overall national priorities.
270 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his proposals in regard to the national eel fishery; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23925/06]
Scientific advice indicates that the eel stock is highly depleted, not only in Ireland but worldwide. Indeed the entire European stock of eel is so seriously depleted that the EU Commission is proposing to introduce a regulation designed to assist in stock recovery. I understand that the life cycle of the eel is such that stock recovery will take several years. The EU regulation, as drafted, will require the preparation of management plans for the recovery of eels in river basin districts as defined under the water framework directive. The Commission proposal also includes emergency measures to be applied, which currently include at least a 50% reduction in exploitation.
The key objective of each management plan will be to allow a minimum of 40% escapement, as would apply in pristine conditions, of adult eel from rivers to the sea to allow for spawning. The plan will set out the mechanisms by which this objective will be achieved and the methods to be employed to monitor their implementation. The Commission has proposed that under the current timescale, plans should be submitted by the end of 2006 and operational, subject to approval in the scientific, technical and economic committee for fisheries, by July 2007.
The methods of application and extent of the prohibition on fishing effort is the subject of on-going debate among member states. In the meantime, the options for implementation of the draft regulation are under consideration by a national working group of officials, even while clarification from the Commission on technical matters is awaited. The fisheries boards will communicate with the industry and keep it informed .
271 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will request the Government of Burma to work with the UN Secretary General in implementing a plan for national reconciliation; if he will further request the UN Secretary General to remain involved in the reconciliation process and to report back to the Council on a regular basis;if he will urge the Government of Burma to ensure immediate, safe and unhindered access to all parts of the country for the United Nations and international humanitarian organisations to provide humanitarian assistance to the most vulnerable groups of the population, including internally displaced people; if he will call for the immediate and unconditional release of Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners in Burma; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23302/06]
Ireland takes a consistently strong position on Burma, including in the European Union framework and at the United Nations. Together with our EU partners, we avail of all opportunities to condemn the abuse of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Burma and deplore the lack of progress towards democracy.
The recent visit by Mr. Gambari, the UN Under-Secretary-General, to Burma from 18-20 May, was the first high-level visit to that country by a UN representative in more than two years. I welcome the fact that he was able to meet with the most senior Burmese leaders as well as with Aung San Suu Kyi and representatives of her party, the National League for Democracy, during the visit. I also welcome the agreement by the Burmese government that the UN should play a role in promoting common ground between the government and the National League for Democracy so that the National Convention, which is due to resume its work in October, can proceed in a more inclusive way. I would appeal to the Burmese authorities to live up to their undertakings in this regard.
While welcoming the above developments, I remain very concerned about the situation. On 26 May, the EU issued a statement which noted with deep concern that the process of democratisation in Burma had recently suffered a worrying setback as the Burmese government stepped up its pressure against ethnic groups and the two main political parties. The statement noted that these actions contradict the professed intention to establish a genuine democratic nation. The statement also urged the Burmese government to accelerate the democratisation process, a process which should engage all political and ethnic forces in the country in a genuine dialogue and lead to the speedy completion of a constitution under civilian rule, which commands popular support and promotes peaceful and sustainable development.
I remain deeply concerned that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi has been detained continuously for three years without charge and, once more, urge the Burmese government to restore fully her freedom and civil liberties. UN USG Gambari's visit generated high hopes that her detention under house arrest, which was up for renewal a few days after he left Burma, might not be renewed by the authorities. This did not happen. On 27 May, the EU issued a further statement which deeply regretted the decision of the Burmese government to extend the house arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and deplored the fact that international appeals, including that of the EU, had once again gone unheard. It said that this decision will be seen as yet another sign that the Burmese government is unwilling to compromise and move in the direction of an all-inclusive democracy.
I will continue to raise concerns about Burma on all possible occasions and to call on the Burmese government to assume its responsibilities towards its people and to allow the fullest possible UN involvement in a genuine process of democratisation and reconciliation. I am also strongly supportive of the fullest possible involvement by the UN Secretary-General, and his representatives, in working with the Burmese authorities on a genuine process of democratisation and reconciliation and in responding to the humanitarian needs of the long-suffering Burmese people.
272 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will raise the issue of the deaths at Guantánamo Detention Centre and challenge the US on their outbursts on these deaths. [23326/06]
The Government regrets the recent deaths at Guantánamo Bay. While the full circumstances surrounding the deaths remain unclear the fact that three detainees committed suicide is deeply troubling. I welcome the fact that the US government has promised a full review of procedures at the camp and that it has been agreed that the International Committee of the Red Cross may shortly undertake another visit to the camp.
The Government has raised the issue of the detainees in Guantánamo Bay with the US Authorities on numerous occasions and we have always made it clear that we believe that those detained in Guantánamo must be treated in accordance with the requirements of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. This position is shared by the EU as a whole and at the meeting of EU Foreign Ministers that I attended in Luxembourg on 12 June, there was general consensus that Guantánamo should be closed as soon as possible. This is also the view of the UN Secretary General.
As I have said previously, I fully endorse the UN Secretary General's view that those held in Guantánamo Bay should either be charged or released, and that the US should close this facility.
273 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he has had with the new Government of Iraq; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23379/06]
The new Iraqi national unity Government was approved by Parliament on 20 May 2006, and the outstanding positions of Defence, the Interior and National Security were filled on 8 June. Iraq now has a sovereign and democratic Parliament and Government, mandated for four years. This is a very significant step in the rebuilding of a democratic Iraq following years of brutal dictatorship.
In order to underline the strong support of the European Union for the new Government, Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari was invited to meet with EU Foreign Ministers, including myself, during the General Affairs and External Relations Council in Luxembourg on 12 June. We had a good exchange of views on the situation in Iraq and on the prospects for the development of a new relationship between Iraq and the EU. The European Council, on 16 June, emphasised the readiness of the EU to renew its engagement with the Government and people of Iraq and looked forward to rapid and early political dialogue with the new Government.
The Government and our EU partners recognise the serious challenges facing the new national unity Government, and are committed to assisting it in its efforts to build security and prosperity for the Iraqi people. Our assistance will be based on the priorities established by the Iraqi Government. The recent opening of an office of the European Commission in Baghdad will enhance this cooperation.
Since 2003, the EU has provided over €700 million in Community support for the reconstruction of Iraq. In the coming year, the Union's contribution will include support for the national reconciliation and constitutional review process, in close cooperation with the UN. The EU will also continue its efforts to promote the rule of law and respect for human rights, including through the Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq. I also expect that the EU will be in a position to launch the negotiation of a Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the new Iraqi Government in the near future.
274 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the details of recent initiatives in respect of the Irish Abroad Initiative; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23380/06]
Maintaining and strengthening links with Irish communities abroad is a key priority of my Department. Officials in our diplomatic missions and in the Irish Abroad Unit are very active in this regard and work closely with Irish community organisations across a wide range of issues.
The Government's firm commitment to enhance support for our communities abroad is reflected in the very substantial level of funding now available for emigrant services. This year, the unprecedented amount of €12 million has been secured for this purpose. This amount follows on other large increases in recent years, so that funding is now 12 times the sum that was available when this Government came to office in 1997.
While the primary emphasis of Government funding continues to be to support frontline welfare services, I am pleased that the additional funding has also made it possible to support a number of capital projects as well as initiatives which foster a greater sense of community.
Supporting the Irish community in Britain, in particular our older emigrants and those at risk of social exclusion, is an area of great importance. In recognition of this, I expect that some 80% of this year's overall allocation will be disbursed to groups there. Grant applications are currently under consideration and I look forward to making an announcement shortly.
Another priority area is that of the undocumented Irish in the United States. Over the St. Patrick's Day period, the Taoiseach and I availed fully of our valuable meetings with President Bush and Members of Congress to make known our strong support for measures that would enable the undocumented to regularise their status. I returned to Washington DC on 24 May to meet again with key legislators so as to reiterate the importance that we attach to this issue. The Ambassador and our officials in the US continue to raise the Government's views in their on-going contacts with key figures.
During my visit to Washington in May, I was happy to meet again with representatives of the Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform (ILIR). This group is proving most effective and the Government has been happy to provide it with financial support. I also greatly appreciate the important work of the Irish welfare and advisory organisations in the US which assist our community there.
While most funding is directed to organisations abroad, I was happy to provide financial support recently totalling €200,000 to three organisations based in Ireland that are engaged in activities of benefit to Irish people abroad. The organisations in question are Emigrant Advice, the Safe Home Programme and the Irish Commission for Prisoners Overseas.
Another positive development has been the recent decision of the Government to widen the eligibility criteria of the Centenarian Bounty scheme such that all Irish citizens born in the island of Ireland who have reached 100 years of age, wherever they may reside, are now eligible to apply for the Bounty.
275 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his contacts with the Democratic Republic of Congo particularly in respect of the forthcoming elections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23381/06]
Presidential and parliamentary elections are now scheduled to take place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) on 30 July 2006. These will be the first multi-party elections in the DRC in over 40 years. A total of 33 candidates will contest the presidency while some 260 political parties and over 9,300 candidates will compete for the 500 legislative seats in the new parliament. Over 25 million people out of an estimated potential electorate of 28 million have registered to vote.
Successfully conducted elections are absolutely critical to the consolidation of peace and security in the DRC and in the Great Lakes Region as a whole. The international community, including Ireland and its EU partners, is investing heavily in ensuring that the forthcoming elections are successful, given the major organisational challenge they represent for a country the size of western Europe with extremely poor basic infrastructure and ongoing security problems. The EU and its Member States alone are contributing some €235 million towards the overall cost of the elections which are estimated at well over $300 million. The EU will also deploy a 250-strong electoral observation mission to monitor the elections.
Nationally, Ireland is also actively supporting the electoral process in the DRC. I was pleased to announce an initial contribution of €500,000 to the UNDP Trust Fund established to meet the costs of the elections, following my meeting last September with the Foreign Minister of the DRC, Mr. Raymond Ramazani Baya, en marge of the UN General Assembly. A further contribution of €800,000 was announced by my Department last month in support of the South African Independent Electoral Commission which is assisting in the logistical organisation and oversight of the elections. The Government has also decided to provide up to ten Permanent Defence Force personnel to serve with the EUFOR RDC mission which the EU is deploying, at UN request, to provide support, if required, to the UN MONUC peace-keeping mission during the electoral period. Ireland also provides three members of the PDF who serve with MONUC while the Government has also contributed over €11 million for emergency and recovery activities in the DRC since 2002, almost €5 million of which has been provided to date in 2006.
Ireland's diplomatic relations with the DRC are handled through our Embassy in South Africa. Officers from the Embassy visit and regularly report on political developments in the DRC, including election preparations and the difficult security situation in eastern DRC, as well as the important role being played by South Africa in support of successful completion of the transition process in the DRC. My Department also maintains regular contact with representatives of the Congolese community based in Ireland.
276 Mr. Lowry asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of visas issued to Belorussian nationals each year since 1986. [23416/06]
Belarus became independent only in 1991 and for some years after that its citizens travelled using USSR passports. Ireland has no representation in Belarus, but the Embassy in Moscow is accredited to that country. The vast majority of visas for Belorussian citizens are, as a result, issued by our Moscow Embassy. Figures for the numbers of visas issued to Belorussian citizens by the Embassy in Moscow are available only from 2003. Following are the available statistics: Visas Issued by the Embassy in Moscow for Belorussian citizens:
740 visas were approved in 2003
322 in 2004
427 in 2005
1,201 in 2006 (up to 31 May).
As a child protection measure, the visa-free status of children who are victims of the Chernobyl disaster was recently lifted and this accounts for the large rise in the numbers issued by the Embassy in Moscow in 2006. In addition to the above, some 89 visas were issued in 2005 by the Visa Office in Dublin for Belorussian citizens, and 56 up to 31 May this year.
277 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the sums committed and those transferred directly or drawn down in each of the years 2004, 2005 and to date in 2006 and projected to year end for emigrant support projects in Britain; the location of each recipient group and their stated programme of work; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23533/06]
Supporting the Irish community in Britain, in particular the more vulnerable members of our community there, is a key priority for the Government. In view of this, most of the Government's emigrant services funding is directed to organisations in Britain that are engaged in a wide range of activities of benefit to our community there.
In 2004, the initial allocation to groups in Britain was €3.57 million. However, during that year additional resources were secured for emigrant services and the final amount distributed to groups in Britain reached €4.33 million. Details of the grants approved and paid out in that year are set out in the table.
In 2005, a further substantial increase in funding for emigrant services was secured. I was happy to approve grants to groups in Britain totalling €7.06 million, an increase of 63% on the previous year. Details of these grant payments are also set out. While the primary area of funding was to support frontline welfare services, additional funding made it possible to also support a number of projects which assist our community in Britain in their wish to maintain and to develop Irish community networks.
This year, €12 million is available for emigrant services worldwide. This figure represents an increase of 45% on 2005 and is twelve-times greater than the 1997 allocation. I expect that some 80% of this will be disbursed in grants to groups in Britain during the course of the year. Grant applications are currently under consideration and I look forward to making an announcement shortly.
|
Location |
Activities of organisation |
||
|
€ |
|||
|
Acton Homeless Concern, North London |
67,560 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Age Concern Ealing |
51,600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Age Concern Hackney Borough |
26,160 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Aisling Return to Ireland Project |
49,980 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Arlington Action Group |
36,420 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Birmingham Irish Community Forum |
40,500 |
Birmingham |
Welfare |
|
Blackfriars Advice Centre |
47,580 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Brent Irish Advisory Service |
120,000 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Broadway — Day Centre & Night Shelter London |
44,800 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Cairde na nGael — Newham & District Friends of Ireland |
61,920 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Camden Elderly Irish Networks |
66,660 |
London |
Welfare |
|
CARA Irish Housing Association |
27,120 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Coventry Irish Society |
93,240 |
Coventry |
Welfare |
|
Cricklewood Homeless Concern |
215,560 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Federated Irish Association, Nottingham & Notts (FIANN) |
43,680 |
Nottingham |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Federation of Irish Societies |
403,080 |
London |
2nd Tier organisation (supports frontline services) |
|
Finsbury Park Street Drinkers Initiative |
39,600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
GAA London Schools Project |
38,400 |
London |
Sport |
|
Gloucester Emergency Accommodation Resource |
15,600 |
Gloucester |
Welfare |
|
Haringey Irish Cultural &Community Care Centre |
99,420 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Immigrant Counselling & Psychotherapy (ICAP) |
110,400 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Centre Housing / Job Powerhouse |
39,120 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Charitable Trust/ ISAS Hammersmith |
124,000 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Commission for Prisoners Overseas |
132,000 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Community Care Manchester |
128,320 |
Manchester |
Welfare |
|
Irish Community Care Merseyside |
130,620 |
Liverpool |
Welfare |
|
Irish Democratic League clubs Lancashire and Yorkshire |
45,000 |
Lancashire and Yorkshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish in Greenwich Project |
111,120 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Travellers Movement |
56,580 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Welfare and Information Centre Birmingham |
181,620 |
Birmingham |
Welfare |
|
Kilburn Irish Pensioners Club |
3,600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Leeds Irish Health and Homes |
100,440 |
Leeds |
Welfare |
|
Leicester Irish Forum |
25,200 |
Leicester |
Welfare |
|
Lewisham Irish Community Centre |
35,640 |
London |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
London Gypsy and Traveller Unit |
77,400 |
London |
Welfare |
|
London Irish Centre Charity Camden |
291,580 |
London |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
London Irish Elders Forum |
50,400 |
London |
Welfare |
|
London Irish Women’s Centre |
104,760 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Luton Irish Forum |
42,180 |
Luton |
Welfare |
|
New Horizon Youth Centre |
38,400 |
London |
Welfare |
|
NOAH Enterprise (Luton Day Centre for the Homeless) |
67,320 |
Luton |
Welfare |
|
Northampton Irish Support Group |
49,980 |
Northampton |
Welfare |
|
RehabCare, Coventry |
65,760 |
Coventry |
Welfare |
|
Safe Home Programme Ltd. (Based in Ireland. Grant in respect of services to emigrants resident in Britain) |
132,000 |
Ireland |
Welfare |
|
Safe Start Foundation |
46,260 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Sandwell Irish Society, West Midlands |
42,360 |
West Bromwich West Midlands |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Sheffield Gypsy and Traveller Support Group |
22,080 |
Sheffield |
Welfare |
|
Sheffield Irish Peoples’ Support & Development Group |
53,280 |
Sheffield |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
South London Irish Welfare Society, Wimbledon |
82,860 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Southwark Irish Pensioners Project |
79,680 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Southwark Travellers’ Action Group (STAG) |
70,500 |
London |
Welfare |
|
St. Mungo’s Housing Association |
34,500 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Tara Irish Pensioners Club |
3,600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Connection at St. Martin’s |
28,440 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Emerald Circle, Harrow |
3,600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Maya Centre |
21,840 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Passage |
55,210 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Simon Community |
56,890 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Location |
Activities of organisation |
||
|
€ |
|||
|
Acton Homeless Concern |
55,128 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Age Concern Ealing |
50,776 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Aisling Return to Ireland |
87,045 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Angel Drug Service |
40,621 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Arlington House |
7,330 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Batley Irish Democratic League Club |
14,507 |
Batley, Yorkshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Birmingham Irish Club |
53,833 |
Birmingham |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Birmingham Irish Community Forum Ltd. |
87,045 |
Birmingham |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Blackfriars Advice Centre |
54,403 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Bolton Irish Community Association |
53,678 |
Bolton |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Brent Adolescent Centre |
14,660 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Brent Irish Advisory Service (BIAS) |
130,643 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Brian Boru Irish Democratic League |
29,015 |
Wigan |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Broadway Homelessness & Support |
36,269 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Cairde na nGael |
50,776 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Camden Elderly Irish Networks |
63,989 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Cara |
28,044 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Celtic & Irish Cultural Society |
7,254 |
Crawley West Sussex |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann |
79,791 |
London |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Conradh na Gaeilge |
29,015 |
Glasgow |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Coventry Irish Society |
117,672 |
Coventry |
Welfare |
|
Cricklewood Homeless Concern |
305,492 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Croy Historical Society |
1,451 |
Glasgow |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Cumann na mBunscoil |
43,522 |
London |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Dundee Dalriada GAA |
7,330 |
Dundee Scotland |
Sport |
|
Equinox Care |
14,507 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Federation of Irish Societies |
870,448 |
London (with regional staff) |
2nd Tier organisation (supports frontline services) |
|
Feis Ghlaschú |
2,932 |
Glasgow |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Fiann |
39,170 |
Nottingham |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Finsbury Park Street Drinkers Initiative |
36,269 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Fireside Day Centre |
47,225 |
Birmingham |
Welfare |
|
GEAR Projects |
29,015 |
Gloucester |
Welfare |
|
Greenwich Irish Pensioners |
2,932 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Halifax Irish Amateur F.C. |
1,451 |
Halifax, Yorkshire |
Sport |
|
Halifax Irish Amateur Rugby League Club |
1,451 |
Halifax, Yorkshire |
Sport |
|
Halifax Irish Centre |
10,155 |
Halifax, Yorkshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Halifax Irish Junior FC |
1,451 |
Halifax, Yorkshire |
Sport |
|
Halifax Irish Society |
7,254 |
Halifax, Yorkshire |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Hammersmith Irish Centre |
36,269 |
London |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Haringey Irish Cultural & Community Centre |
217,612 |
London |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Haringey Irish Pensioners |
4,398 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Harrow Emerald Circle |
2,932 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Hillingdon Borough Irish Society |
59,481 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Huddersfield Irish Centre |
14,507 |
Huddersfield |
Welfare |
|
Immigrant Counselling & Psychotherapy (ICAP) |
142,355 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Association High Wycombe |
14,507 |
High Wycombe Bucks. |
Welfare |
|
Irish Centre Housing |
21,761 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Chaplaincy in Britain |
4,000 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Chaplaincy Traveller Outreach |
58,258 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Charitable Trust, Hammersmith |
90,022 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Commission for Prisoners Overseas |
151,040 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Community Care Manchester |
184,245 |
Manchester |
Welfare |
|
Irish Community Care Merseyside |
188,597 |
Liverpool |
Welfare |
|
Irish Democratic League - Haslingden Davitt Branch |
93,058 |
Haslingden |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish Diaspora Foundation |
47,875 |
Manchester |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish Heritage in Haslingden |
5,658 |
Haslingden |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish In Greenwich |
137,972 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Music Project Leeds |
29,015 |
Leeds |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish National Institute |
14,507 |
Ashton under Lyne Lancashire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Irish Travellers Movement in Britain |
60,048 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Irish Welfare and Information Centre, Birmingham |
174,595 |
Birmingham |
Welfare |
|
Irish World Heritage Centre |
14,507 |
Manchester |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Kilburn Irish Pensioners Club |
4,352 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Kingdom Kerry Gaels |
7,330 |
London |
Sport |
|
Lancashire Federation of the Irish Democratic League |
21,822 |
Nelson & Bolton Lancashire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Leeds Gypsy and Traveller Exchange (GATE) |
52,328 |
Leeds |
Welfare |
|
Leeds Irish Health & Homes |
180,805 |
Leeds |
Welfare |
|
Leicester Irish Forum |
35,906 |
Leicester |
Welfare |
|
Lewisham Irish Community Centre |
53,678 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Lichen Films -Tattie Hokers’ film |
10,262 |
Edinburgh |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
London Gypsy and Traveller Unit |
111,435 |
London |
Welfare |
|
London Irish Centre |
399,930 |
London |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
London Irish Elder’s Forum |
17,825 |
London |
Welfare |
|
London Irish Pensioners Choir |
1,466 |
London |
Welfare |
|
London Irish Women’s Centre |
101,552 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Luton Irish Forum |
295,970 |
Luton |
Welfare |
|
Manchester Irish Festival |
21,761 |
Manchester |
Cultural |
|
Marian Senior Citizens Club |
7,254 |
London |
Welfare |
|
New Horizon Youth Centre |
47,951 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Noah Enterprise |
84,786 |
Luton |
Welfare |
|
Northampton Irish Support Group |
82,693 |
Northampton |
Welfare |
|
Oldham Irish Society |
7,254 |
Oldham |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Pendle and District Irish Society |
1,451 |
Nelson Lancashire |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Queens Park Senior Citizens Group |
4,398 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Rehab Irish Elders Centre Coventry |
101,552 |
Coventry |
Welfare |
|
Round Towers and Treacy Minor GAA |
9,865 |
North Cheam Surrey |
Sport |
|
Safe Home Programme Limited (Based in Ireland. Grant in respect of services to emigrants resident in Britain) |
124,743 |
Mulranny |
Welfare |
|
Safe Start Foundation |
72,537 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Sandwell Irish Society |
20,501 |
West Bromwich West Midlands |
Welfare |
|
Shalloe Pearses GFC |
7,330 |
London |
Sport |
|
Sheffield Gypsy & Traveller Support Group |
21,625 |
Sheffield |
Welfare |
|
Sheffield Support & Development Group |
90,763 |
Sheffield |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
South London Irish Association |
29,091 |
London |
Welfare |
|
South London Irish Welfare Society |
89,946 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Southwark Irish Pensioners |
83,135 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Southwark Irish Youth |
4,352 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Southwark Travellers Action Group (STAG) |
87,045 |
London |
Welfare |
|
St. Anne’s Senior Citizens Club |
2,932 |
Birmingham |
Welfare |
|
St. James The Great Branch Comhaltas |
5,803 |
Glasgow |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
St. Mary’s Social Club & Parochial Hall |
14,507 |
Batley West Yorkshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
St. Michael’s Irish Centre, Liverpool |
42,264 |
Liverpool |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
St. Mungo’s |
45,535 |
London |
Welfare |
|
St. Patrick’s Festival Committee |
14,529 |
Coatbridge Scotland |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
St. Patrick’s Traditional Music Group |
2,901 |
Coatbridge Scotland |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
St. Theresa’s House, Peterborough |
43,979 |
Peterborough |
Welfare |
|
Tara Irish Pensioners |
3,661 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Connection at St Martin’s |
21,761 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Irish Club |
10,764 |
Warrington Cheshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
The London Irish Networks |
5,513 |
London |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
The Maya Centre |
26,552 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Passage |
55,833 |
London |
Welfare |
|
The Simon Community |
52,208 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Tír Conaill Harps |
29,015 |
Glasgow |
Sport |
|
Tuesday Club |
4,352 |
Leeds |
Welfare |
|
Tyneside Irish Centre |
58,030 |
Newcastle upon Tyne |
Welfare & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Tyneside Irish Cultural Society |
14,507 |
Newcastle upon Tyne |
Heritage/Cultural |
|
Warwickshire GAA |
29,015 |
Birmingham |
Sport |
|
Payments made in 2005 in respect of grants approved in 2004 |
|||
|
Lancashire & Yorkshire Irish Democratic League Clubs |
10,000 |
Nelson, Yorkshire |
Community Networks & Heritage/Cultural |
|
Tara Irish Pensioners Club |
600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Emerald Circle, Harrow |
600 |
London |
Welfare |
|
Coventry Irish Society |
15,535 |
Coventry |
Welfare |
278 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the status of the EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement; and the efforts which Ireland has made to exclude the waters of the Western Sahara from the provisions of this agreement, in view of the fact that the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara has been found to be illegal by the International Court of Justice. [23587/06]
The EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement was adopted by the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 22 May 2006. When Morocco has completed its ratification procedures, the Agreement will come into force following an exchange of notifications by both sides.
The Agreement states that it applies to the waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Kingdom of Morocco. As the Deputy will be aware, Morocco regards the Western Sahara and its waters as a part of its territory. However, Ireland and our EU partners do not recognise Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara. The Government strongly supports the right to self-determination of the people of the territory.
The European Commission is responsible for the negotiation of such agreements with third countries. They are adopted by the Council by Qualified Majority Vote. In 2005, the Council approved the Commission's mandate for the negotiations with Morocco. At that time, Ireland raised concerns about possible implications for the overall issue of the status of the Western Sahara and regarding the exploitation of the resources of the Saharawi people. The Commission undertook to ensure that the Agreement would not compromise the issue of status, and would reflect exactly the terms in relation to territorial extent contained in previous Fisheries Agreements between the EU and Morocco.
During consideration by the Council of the draft Agreement negotiated by the Commission, Ireland again focused on these issues. The Government proposed that, in order to clarify the situation beyond question, the EU might adopt a Declaration which would accompany the Agreement. However, it emerged that there was a qualified majority of Member States in favour of approving the Agreement without an EU Declaration.
At the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 22 May, Ireland agreed to the adoption of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement, which is regarded as very important by the European fishing industry, and made a National Statement in relation to the Western Sahara. The full text of the Statement is as follows:
Ireland supports the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco on the basis that it does not prejudice the long-standing position of the EU on the status of the Western Sahara. The EU continues to support the efforts of the UN Secretary General to encourage a negotiated solution which will allow the people of the Western Sahara to exercise their right to self-determination. Ireland emphasises the importance of the future dialogue within the EU-Morocco Joint Committee foreseen under this agreement. It is essential that the Joint Committee make use of all instruments under the Agreement to ensure that the Agreement is implemented to the benefit of all the people concerned and in accordance with the principles of international law.
279 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he has received diplomatic assurances from the US Government regarding their adherence to the procedures and circumstances under which prisoners may be transported through Irish airspace and ground based facilities; if, in view of the discovery that a prisoner was being transported through Shannon Airport without the prior consent of the Irish Government, he remains satisfied as to the trustworthy nature of such assurances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23704/06]
282 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether the recent discovery of a prisoner being transported via Shannon airport in the absence of consent from the Department of Justice was an isolated incident; the way in which he can be certain that other such prisoner transportation’s have not occurred; if he has received assurances from the US Government that no other such transportation’s have taken place without permission from the Irish Government; if so, the form in which these assurances have been communicated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23739/06]
I propose to answer Questions Nos. 279 and 282 together.
On 13 June, I gave the House a detailed account of the matter to which the Deputy's questions refer. On the basis of my and my Department's discussions with the US authorities, I have no reason to believe that this was other than an isolated incident which arose from an administrative error. At my meeting with him on 12 June, the US Ambassador conveyed his deep regret for the breach of procedures, and confirmed his authorities' determination that the use of Irish airspace and airports by the US be completely transparent and in conformity with Irish law and the wishes of the Government.
I am awaiting a written report from the US Embassy. In addition, to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to prevent any recurrence of this incident, we are engaging in further discussion with the US authorities on arrangements for notification and information sharing, and the strengthening of verification procedures as necessary.
As I have previously emphasised, this incident is quite distinct from the much more serious question of extraordinary rendition, and I remain confident of the continuing validity and weight of the clear assurances repeatedly given to us by the US authorities in that context.
280 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of Irish passports issued to Irish people in Rhodesia during the period of sanction from 1965 to 1980; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23721/06]
281 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of Irish passports which were withdrawn from Irish people living in Rhodesia during the period of sanction from 1965 to 1980; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23722/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 280 and 281 together.
In accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 253 of 1968, which imposed mandatory sanctions on the illegal regime in what was then Southern Rhodesia, new passports, or the renewal of existing ones, were not processed in the period 29 May 1968 to 21 December 1979 to Irish citizens for emigration to Southern Rhodesia nor to those of our citizens residing in Southern Rhodesia whose activities furthered or encouraged the unlawful actions of the regime. Since those restrictions were lifted, people who were affected have been able to avail of Irish passport facilities in the same way as Irish citizens generally.
The Department has been unable to locate a record of any individual passport having been withdrawn from an Irish citizen in the then Rhodesia during that period. However, if the Deputy has a particular case in mind, I will be happy to have the position checked out further.
283 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the reason 33 per cent of all money goes to the greyhound industry and horse racing while the Eircom League is under funded; and if he will support Eircom League clubs in 2006. [23325/06]
Funding for horse and greyhound racing is provided for under Section 12 of the Horse and Greyhound Racing Act 2001. This provides for the establishment of a fund which is derived from the revenues accruing to the Exchequer from the excise duty collected as duty on off-course betting. This provides for a guaranteed level of funding each year up to an aggregate total for horse and greyhound racing which is independent of the amount provided for sport in the annual estimates process.
The development of professional football is a matter for the Eircom league and the FAI itself and while over €9 million has been provided by the Irish Sport Council in grants to the FAI since 1999, much of this has been aimed at supporting programmes aimed at increasing participation in football by young people.
My Department has provided grants directly to Eircom league clubs under the sports capital programme to assist with improvements to league grounds. In the period 1998 to 2002, over €11.4 million has been allocated in funding to 17 Eircom league clubs of which about €10million of this amount has been paid out to date. Following the advent of club licensing in 2004, which aims to improve standards across all aspects of the Eircom league, I announced further funding in 2005 of €5.275 million in respect of 16 Eircom league clubs.
Overall my Department has allocated over €84 million to soccer clubs under the sports capital programme since 1998 which underlines my commitment to the development of facilities for soccer in Ireland at all levels.
284 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if a club (details supplied) in Dublin 3 will be assisted with grants and funding in 2006. [23373/06]
Applications for funding under the 2006 Sports Capital Programme were invited through advertisements in the press on 27 and 28 November last. All applications received before the deadline, including one from the organisation in question were evaluated against the programme's assessment criteria, which are outlined in the guidelines, terms and conditions of the programme. I announced details of the provisional grant allocations for local projects on 6 June last.
The application referred to by the Deputy was successful this year and the club were granted a provisional allocation, subject to the terms and conditions of the programme, of €100,000 towards their project. A letter advising the organisation of this allocation, together with details of how the grant may be drawn down, will issue in the near future.
285 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the position regarding the provision of a swimming pool for Castlebar County Mayo; when this project will be put to tender; when a contract will be awarded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23693/06]
Under the Local Authority Swimming Pool Programme, there are four stages in the development of a public swimming pool project. These are, in order of progress, Feasibility Study/Preliminary Report, Contract Documents, Tender and Construction. My Department's technical advisors, the Office of Public Works (OPW), evaluate each stage and prior approval is required before local authorities can proceed from one stage to the next. Grant aid is formally allocated when the tender for the project is approved.
I approved the Preliminary Report for the replacement public pool in Castlebar in April 2005, thus allowing Mayo County Council to prepare Contract Documents for the project. These documents are awaited. It should be noted that progress of projects under the Local Authority Swimming Pool Programme is largely determined, not by my Department, but by the speed at which individual Local Authorities progress their projects.
286 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if a person (details supplied) can apply for a work authorisation visa while they are here working on a holiday visa. [23824/06]
292 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if a person (details supplied) will receive a work permit without having to return home to Australia. [23593/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 286 and 292 together.
I am informed by the Work Permit section that the above named individual entered the State on receipt of a Holiday Working Visa. The purpose of this Exchange Programme is to allow persons into the state for a Working Holiday for a specified period at the end of which they must return home. This person could be the subject of a work permit application; if such an application was made the normal requirements would apply. Whether an employee stays in the State whilst the application is being processed is a matter for the Immigration Authorities.
287 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of factories on a county basis, on which the IDA have long term lease agreements, which are empty; and the cost to the State of long-term lease agreements for such premises. [23307/06]
At present there are 37 vacant properties on which IDA Ireland has long-term lease agreements. These leases, which are 35 year leases, were entered into between 1983 and 1989. The outstanding balance of these leases ranges from 12 to 18 years. The outstanding amount due on the balance of the leases is €41,211,735. It is hoped that a number of these properties might be occupied or redeveloped during the period, which would have the potential to reduce this possible amount.
|
County |
Number of properties |
|
Cork |
7 |
|
Donegal |
3 |
|
Dublin |
9 |
|
Galway |
2 |
|
Kildare |
4 |
|
Waterford |
7 |
|
Westmeath |
3 |
|
Wexford |
2 |
288 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if he, or any body under the aegis of his Department have received reports or correspondence in relation to the dangers posed to workers in the asbestos industry here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23351/06]
The Health and Safety Authority is the national competent authority with responsibility to enforce legislation governing the protection of workers from exposure to asbestos at work. I am informed that in this context, the Authority receives approximately 350 notifications and accompanying site specific reports and plans per year relating to asbestos at work as required by legislation, as a result of workplace inspections, and in the context of requests for advice.
I am informed that to ensure that current best practice is used to prevent and control the risk of exposure of workers to asbestos fibres at work, the Authority takes account of the latest available international research, reports, and guidance documentation in its enforcement activities.
289 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if civil servants being decentralised to Carlow will have to undergo six months training in Dublin before they can take up their position in Carlow; if certain exemptions will be made to allow for family illnesses and so on; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23362/06]
It is essential that the decentralisation of staff to Carlow be on a basis that allows for training overlap and transfer of knowledge to new staff without affecting service delivery. Ideally, Carlow bound staff should be in their sections for up to six months in advance of the actual physical move to Carlow. With regard to exemptions to allow for family illnesses and so on, such cases will be assessed on their individual merits, having regard to the business needs of the sections concerned.
290 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 669 of 28 September 2005, the progress to date on the inspection regime under the metrology law; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23445/06]
The Deputy will be aware of the background to this matter from replies on 28 September 2005, 25 January and 16 February 2006. Limited inspections of meat plants are continuing to be undertaken; fourteen plants have been visited since January 2006 and no breaches of the legislation requiring prosecution were found. However, a full programme of inspections of weighing equipment in meat processing plants will not be possible until an industrial relations issue relating to the hiring of private hauliers for the conveyance and lifting of test equipment is resolved.
A Labour Relations Commission hearing on 27 March 2006 was unsuccessful in resolving the matter and further negotiations are ongoing between management and staff representatives. An external facilitator has been engaged but due to the non-availability of some of the parties to the negotiation over the coming weeks the facilitation process is not expected to take place for a number of weeks. Failing resolution at that stage, the matter will be referred back for hearing by the Labour Relations Commission.
291 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if core funding will be provided to allow people who are currently working on community employment schemes providing services for the disability sector to be appointed on a permanent basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23450/06]
Community Employment is an active labour market programme designed to provide eligible long term unemployed people and other disadvantaged persons (including those with a disability) with an opportunity to engage in useful work within their communities on a fixed term basis. CE helps unemployed people to re-enter the active workforce by breaking their experience of unemployment through a return to a work routine and to assist them to enhance/develop both their technical and personal skills.
The aim of CE still remains as an active labour market programme with the emphasis on progression into employment. The programme is managed within this context and with consideration to the needs of participants and the community and the demand for CE resources from those Organisations delivering services.
On 10 November, 2004, following a review of FÁS Employment Schemes (Community Employment, Job Initiative and Social Economy Programmes), I announced that Community Employment places supporting the delivery of health services, including those for people with disabilities would continue to be ring-fenced.
Decisions regarding the provision of core funding for the health services generally are a matter for the Minister for Health and Children.
293 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 200 of 29 September 2004, the grant aid returned to his Department by the company; the grant aid paid to the company in the past 10 years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23832/06]
The total amount of grants paid by Enterprise Ireland and its predecessors to the company in question over the period 1995-2005 was €424,065. In addition, the company received payments of €824,324 under the FEOGA Programme.
The company has not returned any grant aid to Enterprise Ireland. Discussions concerning grant aid to the plant at Rooskey, County Roscommon are still continuing. Progress is being made on the negotiations and I understand that a conclusion will be reached shortly. This will take account of a very significant investment which is being undertaken by the company in its pork division in Ireland. In addition, Enterprise Ireland is continuing its efforts to stimulate further investment at the Rooskey plant.
294 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the efforts currently being made in cooperation with Enterprise Ireland, IDA, County Enterprise, FÁS and other agencies involved in issues to do with job creation and training to address the unemployment issues in the north west and east Donegal in particular; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23844/06]
The Deputy will be aware that there have been significant employment developments for Donegal recently. In March 2006, I announced the establishment of a new Enterprise Managed Service Centre by AssetCo in Buncrana. The project involves an investment of €5.2 million and will lead to the creation of 130 new jobs. Also, in March 2006, I announced that Abbott, one of the world's largest healthcare companies, is to make a further high value healthcare investment in Ireland of €36 million, to establish a manufacturing facility in Donegal town which will create at least 155 high quality jobs with over 45% requiring a third level qualification. I announced 210 new jobs last September being created by Zeus Industrial Products, Letterkenny and PowerBoard, Burnfoot. These projects are being supported by the Industrial Development Agency and Enterprise Ireland.
I can assure you that the State development agencies under my auspices, IDA, EI, FÁS and Donegal County Enterprise Board, are fully committed to supporting and promoting job creation and job retention in Donegal. In addition to recent job announcements, this commitment is also evidenced by ongoing development and support by the Agencies for a number of business parks and enterprise centres in Donegal. These include the completion of the IDA Letterkenny Business Park, the provision of a 25,000 square foot advance office building at Windyhall, the completion of site development work at Ballyshannon for a new facility and also a development at Buncrana, where IDA is working with a local developer to provide new manufacturing and office buildings. In addition to providing support for nine Community Enterprise Centres in Donegal, Enterprise Ireland has also provided substantial support for the expansion of the Letterkenny Institute of Technology Business Development Centre and the development of a Marine Biotechnology Centre.
However, I also recognise that there have been significant job losses in Donegal in recent years, particularly in traditional sectors such as textiles and clothing. The Government is doing all in its power to create structures through its Enterprise Development and Training agencies, which will facilitate those who have lost jobs to gain new ones, particularly ones that offer more opportunity both in terms of skills and permanence.
This Government recognizes the particular difficulties in Donegal and is working to assist in improving the overall environment to increase the attractiveness of Donegal as a location for enterprises. In that context, I established the Inter-Departmental Group on Donegal, which is chaired by the Secretary General of my Department. I intend to announce the findings of the Group in the very near future, having consulted my Cabinet colleagues.
Finally, I can assure the Deputy that support for job creation in Donegal will continue to be a priority for the State development agencies under the auspices of my Department.
295 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his views on the reality that the Council of Europe’s Committee on Social Rights in its conclusions for 2005 found that Ireland was in breach of implementing the revised European Social Charter. [23956/06]
The Council of Europe has standard reporting procedures in relation to the revised Social Charter which apply to all Contracting Parties (i.e. those Member States that have signed and ratified the Charter). Ireland signed and ratified the Revised Social Charter on 4 November 2000. The Revised Social Charter has 31 Articles. In preparing Reports, the Department has to consult both internally and with most other Government Departments in relation to updating material on any relevant legislative and/or administrative changes that have taken place which impact on our implementation of the Revised Social Charter. Given the range of issues to be covered and the number of Departments to be consulted, gathering and clarifying up- to-date responses on a wide range of topics can be quite demanding, having regard to the steady growth in other reporting obligations on all Departments.
In light of the substantially increased reporting requirements under the Revised Social Charter — 31 Articles compared with 19 in the original Social Charter from 1961 — the Department undertook to review criticisms of the Irish response made by the European Committee of Social Rights — who examine in detail, individual Member States' Reports on the implementation of the Revised Social Charter — and how implementation might be made more effective in the future. As part of this process, officials of this department had a meeting in Dublin on 4 October 2005 with a Delegation from the Council of Europe, including their Secretariat and members of the European Committee of Social Rights.
At that meeting, the delays in submitting our Second and Third Reports on our implementation of the Revised Social Charter were discussed. It was acknowledged by the Council of Europe delegation that 3 of the Articles in our Second Report had already been submitted to Strasbourg. However, as we had in parallel done some work on our Third Report — which updates Ireland's reporting on the 9 "core" Articles for the period ending 31 December 2004 — the Department agreed with the Council representatives to prioritise the completion of the Third Report, before reverting to the completion of the Second Report.
The reason for this approach is that the Third Report is effectively, an update of our First Report submitted in May 2004 on the 9 core Articles, and it was anticipated that this Report could be completed quickly. In fact, I am happy to say that the Department submitted the completed Third Report last month. This Department will now complete the Second Report on the outstanding 21 Articles as the material involved is received from Departments and Agencies and edited by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. Having due regard to other pressing demands, I expect that this process should be completed by mid July. Accordingly, there is no question of information being withheld from the Council of Europe and the Department is determined to eliminate backlogs in reporting developments as soon as possible. If, in effect, Ireland has been remiss in relation to any aspect of the European Social Charter, it has been in relation to some reporting requirements and not in relation to the substance of the Charter.
I consider that the Revised Social Charter is being properly implemented by Ireland, having regard to our national legislation and administrative practices. Any queries raised by the European Committee of Social Rights are, and will continue to be, addressed as part of the Reporting procedures laid down by the Council of Europe.
296 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of the 450 decentralised jobs promised to County Clare in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Kilrush and Shannon; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [24206/06]
The Government has decided that the Headquarters of Enterprise Ireland, including 300 posts, will relocate to Shannon as part of the Decentralisation programme. The timing of the major move of Enterprise Ireland staff to Shannon Town is dependent on the assembly of sufficient suitably qualified and experienced people volunteering to transfer to Shannon, within the terms of the Government decision, to undertake the work of the areas scheduled for location in Shannon. This, in turn, is dependent, inter alia, on the outcome at national level of negotiations between the Department of Finance and the unions representing public sector staff in relation to the key issues of concern to the staff in the Agencies scheduled to transfer to regional locations.
The most immediate implementation step for Enterprise Ireland is to provide for a new HQ building, designed to meet the business needs of the organisation. Enterprise Ireland, working closely with the Office of Public Works (OPW), has identified but not yet acquired a preferred site from the submissions received by the OPW in relation to the Shannon location. The preferred site is a 13-acre site owned by Shannon Development. In addition, and in co-operation with Shannon Development and OPW, the site was valued and a feasibility study carried out. The site occupies a prime position near the centre of Shannon and is considered suitable for a major landmark building or civic structure related to the town centre.
The most recent information from the CAF indicated that 19 Enterprise Ireland staff have applied for decentralisation to Enterprise Ireland in Shannon. Of these, 15 are Dublin based and 4 are based outside Dublin.
297 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of the 380 decentralised jobs promised to County Donegal in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Buncrana, Donegal Town and Gweedore; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23755/06]
298 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of the 265 decentralised jobs promised to County Leitrim in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23758/06]
299 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of the 110 decentralised jobs promised to County Monaghan in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Carrickmacross and Monaghan; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23760/06]
300 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of the 100 decentralised jobs promised to Sligo Town in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23762/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 297 to 300, inclusive, together.
Under the Government decentralisation programme announced in Budget 2004, this Department is due to decentralise all of its Dublin based headquarters sections, involving some 1,210 staff, to six locations throughout the country. In addition, the Combat Poverty Agency and Comhairle, agencies under the aegis of the Department, will be relocated to Monaghan and Drogheda, respectively. According to the Progress Report to the Minister for Finance on 30 June 2005, the following are the indicative construction start and finish dates for each of the locations.
|
Location |
Indicative Construction Start |
Indicative Construction Completion |
|
Carrick-on-Shannon |
Underway |
Q4 2006 |
|
Drogheda |
Q1 2007 |
Q1 2009 |
|
Sligo |
Underway |
Q3 2006 |
|
Buncrana |
End 2007 |
Early 2009 |
|
Carrickmacross |
End 2007 |
End 2008 |
|
Donegal |
End 2007 |
Mid 2009 |
This Department is due to relocate 220 posts to Carrick-on-Shannon — the remaining posts will be relocated from the Central Fisheries Board. The move to Carrick-on-Shannon will be completed in a two phases — phase one will involve some 130 posts and a building is scheduled to be ready for occupation in early 2007. There is no agreed timeframe for the second phase.
To date, 20 staff have been relocated to Sligo under the decentralisation programme. All of the posts were filled by applicants on the Central Application Facility (CAF). The remainder of the posts will move to Sligo early in 2007. According to figures received from the Central Applications Facility (CAF), the number of applications for each location and those based in Dublin are as follows.
|
Location |
Total Applications |
Dublin based Applicants |
|
Buncrana |
33 |
17 |
|
Carrickmacross |
74 |
18 |
|
Carrick-on-Shannon |
280 |
69 |
|
Donegal |
109 |
48 |
|
Monaghan |
39 |
15 |
|
Sligo |
131 |
96 |
These figures, with the exception of Sligo, represent applications made through the CAF before the priority application date of 7 September 2004. In the case of Sligo, new applications made or applicants who amended their application to indicate Sligo as their first preference are included in the total. The CAF will remain open for new applications until the full decentralisation programme is complete.
301 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will provide details of the wide package of reforms of State aid for lone parents that he is currently considering; when he hopes to have this package complete; if he expects same to be in place before the end of 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23224/06]
The major Government discussion paper, "Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents", which I launched in March this year, addresses the social exclusion and risk of poverty faced by many such families and their children. The report puts forward radical proposals for reform of the income support system for all parents on a low income. The report proposes the expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities for lone parents, the extension of the National Employment Action Plan to focus on lone parents, focused provision of childcare, improved information services for lone parents and the introduction of a new Parental Allowance for low income families with young children.
The Government has asked the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion to draw up an implementation plan to progress the non-income recommendations of the discussion paper, including those related to childcare, education, training and activation measures and work on this has already commenced in consultation with the Departments and agencies concerned. Issues including the impact of the proposals on the qualified adult allowance, the limitation rule, part-time unemployment payments and age related poverty traps, will all be taken into account in the implementation of the proposals.
As a follow-up to the publication of the discussion paper, I hosted a National Consultative Forum on 27th April 2006. This Forum was attended by social partners, representatives of organisations dealing with lone parents and the unemployed, representatives of Government departments and State agencies who will be responsible for the implementation of the proposals in the discussion paper and members of the Oireachtas. At the Forum, I heard the views of each organisation on the proposals including their comments on the proposed parental allowance and invited them to make a formal written submission setting out those views.
The Government will listen closely to the views expressed and will give very serious consideration to them. As soon as I am convinced that we have reached conclusions that are fully workable and equitable, it will be my intention to bring forward proposals for legislation in the course of this year.
302 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of mailshots carried out to child benefit recipients in the past five years; the dates on which these mailshots occurred; the cost of same respectively; the number and percentage of letters which were returned on each of the respective dates; the action he has taken as a result of such returns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23227/06]
My Department issues mailshots to customers as a means of communicating with them regarding their entitlements and changes which arise from time to time as a result of budgetary and other actions. The mailshots form part of the Department's control activities on the Child Benefit scheme. In the past 5 years a total of 6 mailshots have issued to Child Benefit recipients. One result arising from the mailshots has been savings of some €22m in Child Benefit expenditure. A single claim termination can result in annual savings of up to €10,000.
Mailshots result in a significant number of letters being returned undelivered by An Post, thus indicating that the customer is not at the address notified to the Department. The customer may simply have moved address and not notified the Department or alternatively could have left the country, in which case Child Benefit may no longer be payable.
Details of the mailshots carried out over the last 5 years and resultant action are as follows: July 2001 — A mailshot issued to all Child Benefit customers informing them of budget changes and information concerning the upcoming EURO conversion and how it would affect their payments. The total number of forms issued was 511,000 at a cost of £219,498. Over 10,000 letters were returned undelivered by An Post as the customer was not at the address. Subsequent investigation of these cases resulted in 353 claims being terminated as the whereabouts of the customer could not be established.
In July 2002 and again in July 2003, a mailshot was issued to Child Benefit customers being paid by Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT), informing them of recent budget rate changes. A total of 171,000 customers were contacted. The total cost was €68,773.00 in 2002 and €72,618 in 2003. As a result of these mailshots over 5,000 letters were returned. Following investigation, 605 claims were terminated as the customer was found to have either left the state or their whereabouts could not be established. In August 2004, an information mailshot issued to the then 195,580 EFT-paid customers informing them of the most recent rates increases. The total cost was €83,950. A total of 6,186 letters was returned undelivered. On investigation of these cases some 1,065 claims were terminated.
During 2005 a targeted mailshot was issued, for control purposes, to a group of over 10,000 customers to confirm their residency status. The cost of this was €5,993. A total of 816 letters was returned and after investigation some 250 claims were terminated.
In April 2006, an information leaflet was issued by the Department, on behalf of the Office of the Minister for Children, to the 259,000 Child Benefit customers who will qualify for the Early Childcare Supplement (ECS). This provided information to customers regarding claim and payment arrangements in connection with the scheme. The total cost of this was €135,000. To date 4,500 letters have been returned and investigations are ongoing to establish the present position of these customers.
303 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if the over 80 allowance is automatically paid in respect of the qualified adult on a person’s pension and the claimant directly when both people are over the age of eighty years; if not, the amount it would cost to extend the qualified adult allowance element to include the over 80 allowance on an annual basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23305/06]
The over 80 allowance is an extra payment to people receiving social welfare pensions and in Budget 2006 I was pleased to raise this to €10 per week. The allowance is paid in respect of the main claimant and is not available to those receiving social welfare support as qualified adults on the pension of their spouse or partner. There is no necessity for a person to make an application for payment of the allowance as it is applied automatically to their pension when they reach 80 years of age. At present, there are approximately 5,500 qualified adults who are over 80 years of age on old age contributory and retirement pensions. The cost of extending the allowance to this group would be about €3 million per annum.
304 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans to retain the services of An Post for the payment of social welfare entitlements to the public; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23446/06]
The current range of payment options offered by my Department include payment at post offices by means of a pension order book and by electronic or manual postdraft, issued to the customer's designated post office each week. Currently some 55% of customers have chosen to receive payment through their local post office. Payments are also made by cheque to the home address of the customer and direct payment to the customer's bank or building society account. Some 9% are paid by cheque through the postal system and 36% have chosen to receive direct electronic payment to their bank or building society account.
My objective is to ensure that a wide choice of payment options is available to customers of my Department and that service is continually improved by providing access to an increasing range of payment services. Customers opt for a particular payment method having regard to their own circumstances.
It is Government policy to facilitate the greater use of electronic payment systems in the economy in the interests of developing a world class payments environment in Ireland. In this context, I have initiated a strategic review of my Department's payment requirements with the aim of identifying a payment solution for the future, which will be flexible, cost-effective and customer focused. I am aware that An Post is conscious of the need to introduce modern payment systems and my expectation is that An Post will respond to developments and product innovation in the money transmission market so that it can maintain its position as a leading player in this area of commercial activity and thus ensure a viable network of post offices serving the needs of local communities throughout the country.
An Post and my Department have been partners in the delivery of social welfare payments since the foundation of the State. I am confident that An Post and the network of post offices will continue to play a key role in the delivery of social welfare payments in the future.
308 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans for social housing and rent support having particular regard to the views of his predecessor to the effect that housing is a matter for the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23252/06]
309 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to get directly involved in meeting the housing requirements of those currently on housing waiting lists and applicants for or in receipt of rent support; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23253/06]
311 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to take over responsibility for local authority or social housing from the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23255/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 308, 309 and 311 together.
I do not intend to take over responsibility for housing from my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, nor do I intend to get directly involved in meeting the housing requirements of those currently on housing waiting lists. Under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare Division of the Health Service Executive, a weekly or monthly rent supplement is available to assist eligible people who are unable to meet their immediate accommodation needs through their own resources.
In recent years, a significant number of people have come to rely on rent supplements for extended periods, including people on local authority housing waiting lists. In response to this situation, the Government has introduced new rental assistance arrangements giving local authorities specific responsibility for meeting the longer-term housing needs of people receiving rent supplement for 18 months or more, on a phased implementation basis. When fully operational, local authorities will meet the housing needs of these individuals through a range of approaches including the traditional range of social housing options, the voluntary housing sector and, in particular, the new rental accommodation scheme.
The Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government has indicated that at the beginning of June 2006 over 1,200 tenants have been accommodated under the Rental Accommodation Scheme, with a further 770 accommodated in local authority housing. This is the first step towards having the new arrangements fully operational nationwide by September 2008. These arrangements are intended to be a long-term housing option for the people concerned. In order to finance this initiative €19 million was transferred from my Department's Vote to the Environment, Heritage and Local Government Vote in 2005 and a further €19 million has been transferred for 2006. Similar arrangements will apply in successive years as the new arrangements are fully implemented.
The new rental assistance arrangements provide an imaginative additional approach in supporting people with longer-term housing needs. By definition, people on rent supplement for extended durations have a long-term housing need that they cannot otherwise meet, and many of them are on local authority housing lists. The new scheme, particularly the rental accommodation component, will reduce housing waiting lists by providing a useful additional mechanism for providing social housing, alongside more traditional social housing construction programmes and the expansion of the voluntary housing sector.
At the end of 2005, 60,176 households were in receipt of assistance under the rent supplement scheme. Over half of these, almost 33,000 tenants, have been on the scheme for 18 months or more. My Department and the Health Service Executive are actively assisting the local authorities and the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in implementing the new arrangements. I am satisfied that the difficulties faced by long-term private sector tenants are being tackled and all of the relevant agencies are co-operating actively to make the new system work successfully.
In recent weeks I have mentioned the concept of some form of housing supplement as a possible alternative to rent supplementation. I am conscious that the rent supplement scheme has become a form of social housing in its own right and for this reason, I am anxious that all avenues are explored to provide financial support for people on long-term rent supplementation who may be in a position to purchase their own home. In this regard my Department and the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, are together overseeing a study which will examine possible approaches. I have asked that the study be undertaken as a matter of urgency and I expect to have a report in the Autumn.
310 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of persons in receipt of rent support in each of the past five years; the number of houses built to meet their housing needs in the same period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23254/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. The purpose of the scheme is to provide short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source. Neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to decisions on individual claims.
The number benefiting under the scheme has increased from 45,028 in 2001 to 60,176 at the end of 2005 and at 9 June 2006, there were 60,281 in receipt of a payment. The tabular statement shows details of the number of recipients for each of the years 2001 to 2005. Responsibility for housing, including housing statistics, are a matter for my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
|
Year |
Recipients |
|
2001 |
45,028 |
|
2002 |
54,213 |
|
2003 |
59,976 |
|
2004 |
57,874 |
|
2005 |
60,176 |
|
9/6/06 |
60,281 |
312 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of countries with which bilateral social welfare agreements exist; if such arrangements are working satisfactory in terms of the length of time taken to process an application; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23256/06]
Ireland has social security agreements with Austria, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the USA and Switzerland. These agreements came into effect between 1989 and 1999, except for that with the UK which came into effect in 1971. Ireland also has a bilateral understanding with Quebec since 1 October 1994.
All of these agreements are currently in operation and working satisfactorily. The main purpose of the agreements is to protect the social security pension rights of workers who have worked both in Ireland and the other country to which the agreement applies. In the case of certain countries they have limited application as the EU Regulations normally apply in these cases.
Liaison procedures have been established with each country and are kept under constant review. Regular contact is made with the appropriate agencies to ensure the smooth transfer of the necessary information required to decide on claims. At present, no significant difficulties are being experienced in relation to any of the agreements.
For all schemes, the time taken to process claims that fall to be examined under bilateral agreements is longer than that for standard Irish entitlements, reflecting the added complexity that arises in determining entitlements under these agreements. While every effort is made to minimise processing times, the overriding objective in dealing with these claims is to ensure that people receive their full entitlements.
I am satisfied that overall the procedures are working effectively and efficiently.
313 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he intends to improve or liberalise the conditions for receipt of free schemes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23257/06]
The household benefits package, which comprises the electricity/gas allowance, telephone allowance and television licence schemes, is generally available to people living permanently in the State, aged 66 years or over, who are in receipt of a social welfare type payment or who satisfy a means test.
The package is also available to carers and people with disabilities under the age of 66 who are in receipt of certain welfare type payments. People aged over 70 years of age can qualify regardless of their income or household composition.
Widows and widowers aged from 60 to 65 whose late spouses had been in receipt of the household benefits package retain that entitlement to ensure that households do not suffer a loss of entitlements following the death of a spouse.
A range of proposals, have been made to extend the coverage of the household benefits package of free schemes. These proposals are being kept under review in the context of the objectives of the scheme and budgetary resources.
314 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of applications for rent support refused in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23258/06]
315 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of appeals against decisions in respect of rent allowance in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23259/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 314 and 315 together.
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme (SWA), is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive (HSE). Neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to decisions on individual claims or in the Executive's appeals process.
Statistics are not available on the number of people refused rent supplement as all claims are not registered on the Department's computer system. However, information is available on the number of claims registered for rent supplement and on the number of claims awarded since 2003. The tabular statement (Table 1) shows the number of rent supplement claims registered and awarded for this period.
Under existing arrangements, an appeal against a decision for entitlement to rent supplement is made in the first instance to the designated appeals office in the HSE. Following on from this a person may if they so wish, make a subsequent appeal to the Social Welfare Appeals Office if they are dissatisfied with the decision of the HSE appeals office.
Details of the number of appeals to HSE Appeals Officers relating to rent supplement are available only for the calendar year 2005. 549 rent supplement appeals were allowed, 860 rent supplement appeals were disallowed and 267 rent supplement appeals were withdrawn in the HSE Appeals Offices in 2005.
Details of the number of appeals relating to rent supplement dealt with by the Social Welfare Appeals Office are available for each year since 2003. Table 2 shows the number of rent supplement claims allowed and disallowed since then.
|
Year |
Registered |
Awarded |
|
2003 |
54,466 |
53,750 |
|
2004 |
44,126 |
41,838 |
|
2005 |
43,744 |
41,734 |
|
2006 |
19,314 |
18,511 |
|
Year |
Disallowed |
Allowed |
|
2003 |
238 |
50 |
|
2004 |
150 |
59 |
|
2005 |
120 |
50 |
|
2006* |
51 |
24 |
* Statistics for 2006 available up to June 2006.
316 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of applications for family income supplement in each of the past five years; the numbers, granted, refused or pending; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23260/06]
The information requested by the Deputy is as follows:
|
Family Income Supplement |
Claims Received |
Claims Awarded |
Claims Refused |
Pending Decision at the end of the year |
|
Position at |
||||
|
31 December 2001 |
16,582 |
12,396 |
3,844 |
1,264 |
|
31 December 2002 |
17,878 |
13,439 |
3,300 |
1,454 |
|
31 December 2003 |
18,611 |
13,795 |
3,235 |
2,582 |
|
31 December 2004 |
20,458 |
17,904 |
3,507 |
1,175 |
|
31 December 2005 |
22,928 |
19,371 |
2,982 |
2,130 |
|
Week ending 9/6/06 |
15,276 |
10,416 |
1,830 |
5,132 |
317 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if rent support will be increased in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23262/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. Neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to decisions on individual claims.
The Executive has been contacted concerning this case and has advised that a rent supplement has recently been awarded to the person concerned but that the bank details of the person concerned are required before payment can issue. It has further advised that her personal contribution towards her rent is at €13 per week. This is the minimum contribution payable, and means that she is getting the maximum weekly rate of rent supplement payable to a person in her circumstances.
318 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs further to Parliamentary Question Number 42 of 10 May 2006, if he will confirm whether, in a case where a fire-fighter must seek employment within the geographical area of his or her retainer contract with a local authority, such a contract could be used by a deciding officer to determine that this is an unreasonable restriction on the location of the employment he or she is prepared to accept. [23820/06]
Social Welfare legislation provides that a person must satisfy the conditions of being available for and genuinely seeking work in order to be entitled to unemployment benefit or assistance. Any person who fails to satisfy these conditions on an on-going basis is not entitled to an unemployment payment.
Part-time fire-fighters are entitled to an unemployment payment in respect of days that they are engaged in fire-fighting or training. They are, however, required to satisfy the statutory conditions for the receipt of an unemployment payment i.e. they must continue to be available for and genuinely seeking work and, in this respect, Deciding Officers do not treat them differently to any other unemployment benefit or assistance claimant.
In applying the legislation, Deciding Officers have regard to the availability of job vacancies in the locality, the age and educational qualifications together with the family circumstances of the particular claimant. Regard is also had to the extent to which a claimant has sought to take advantage of existing labour market opportunities in their locality.
The legislation does not impose any restriction or limitation on the right of a person to the opportunity to engage in the employment of his or her choice. Where a person is seeking work in his or her usual employment and there is a reasonable prospect of securing work of that nature she or he would normally satisfy the conditions for receipt of payment.
After a period of unemployment, a person must be prepared to accept any employment for which she or he is qualified. It is a cardinal principle of the availability for work condition that a person's unemployment must be involuntary and it is not possible for an unemployed person to hold herself or himself available exclusively for employment that is within a restricted distance from a fire station where she or he is employed as a part-time fire person. Such action would be taken as placing an unreasonable restriction on his/her availability to secure full-time employment.
While the importance of retained fire brigade personnel is fully recognised, the introduction of special arrangements exempting them from the requirements to fulfil any of the statutory conditions for entitlement to unemployment benefit or assistance would raise equity issues vis-à-vis other claimants to unemployment payments and there are no current plans to make any changes to this legislation
320 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reasons deciding officers in his Department decided that a person (details supplied) in County Wexford was not insurable under the Social Welfare Acts; if this decision was influenced by the fact that the person in question was employed by their spouse; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23943/06]
The social welfare code provides that a person who is employed by his/her husband or wife is excepted for social insurance coverage (Part 2 of the First Schedule of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act, 2005). This is a long-standing provision and it mirrors similar exclusions under employment protection legislation. This applies to both men and women in family employment and recognises the practical difficulties in establishing the nature of a genuine contract of employment in such circumstances.
The person concerned applied for Maternity Benefit. During an examination of her application it became clear that she was employed by her husband and the case was referred to Scope section in my Department for determination of the insurability of her employment. A deciding officer issued a formal decision that her employment was not insurable under the social welfare acts as it was excepted under the above legislation. The person appealed this decision and an Appeals Officer upheld the deciding officer's decision.
321 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Transport if he will ensure an end to the noise pollution from jet skis after 9.00 pm near Clontarf Road, Dublin 3; and if he will work with Dublin City Council, the Health Service Executive and other relevant bodies on this issue. [23374/06]
Under the Maritime Safety Act 2005 local authorities have been given the necessary powers to control the operation of jet skis and other fast powered craft in their functional areas.
The framework for regulating such craft came from the 2000 Report of the Action Group on Small Powered Recreational Craft (including personal watercraft) which concluded that the primary public policy response should be the use of local bye-laws. Conditions and issues vary in different parts of the country and it makes sense that those closest and with local knowledge regulate for the particular circumstances.
Section 6 of the Maritime Safety Act 2005, provides that by-laws may be made regulating or controlling the operation of craft or specified craft, including jet skis, by local authorities in waters in their functional areas, harbour authorities and Waterways Ireland in waters under their control or management. The by-laws can be used to prohibit or restrict in specified waters or at specified times/periods the use of such craft, for the purposes of, amongst other things, preventing nuisance to persons.
The Maritime Safety Directorate of my Department has issued guidelines to the relevant authorities, including Dublin City Council, on the powers available to them to regulate craft under the 2005 Act.
Furthermore, any person who feels that noise from a watercraft is causing a serious nuisance may raise the matter with the local authority or harbour authority concerned for consideration having regard to the provisions of the 2005 Act.
Under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (Noise) Regulations 1994, a local authority or any person may seek an order in the District Court to have noise giving reasonable cause for annoyance abated. The procedures involved have been simplified to allow action to be taken without legal representation. A public information leaflet outlining the legal options available to persons experiencing noise nuisance is available from the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government and on that Department's website, www.environ.ie.
322 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Transport his views on the shortage of wheelchair accessible taxis for people with disabilities; the percentage of taxi cabs which are wheelchair accessible; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23665/06]
The Taxi Regulation Act 2003 established the Commission for Taxi Regulation as the independent body responsible for the development and maintenance of the regulatory framework for the control and operation of small public service vehicles, including taxis, and their drivers. One of the specific objectives given to the Commission in the 2003 Act is to promote access to small public service vehicles by people with disabilities.
The Commission for Taxi Regulation has published a detailed Action Plan 2006-2007, Driving Forward, which sets out a range of changes the Commission proposes to make over the next two years in relation to the control and regulation of taxis, hackneys and limousines and their drivers. Among the specific proposals being developed by the Commission are measures aimed at improving accessibility. I understand that in July 2006 a further consultation process will be undertaken by the Commission in relation to vehicle standards, with a particular emphasis on improving accessibility.
The Sectoral Plan for Transport under the Disability Act 2006 is currently being finalised for presentation to the Houses of the Oireachtas by end July 2006, as required by the Act. The Plan will also set out a programme for action on accessibility in a number of key transport areas, including the taxi and hackney sector.
Data in relation to the overall number of taxis licensed to operate and the percentage of that total that are wheelchair accessible taxis is available from the Commission for Taxi Regulation.
323 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Transport the measures he intends to introduce to ensure the availability of wheelchair accessible taxi cabs for people with disabilities under his Departments outline sectoral plan for the disabled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23666/06]
The Taxi Regulation Act 2003 established the Commission for Taxi Regulation as the independent body responsible for the development and maintenance of the regulatory framework for the control and operation of small public service vehicles, including taxis, and their drivers. One of the specific objectives given to the Commission in the 2003 Act is to promote access to small public service vehicles by people with disabilities.
The Commission for Taxi Regulation has published a detailed Action Plan 2006-2007, Driving Forward, which sets out a range of changes the Commission proposes to make over the next two years in relation to the control and regulation of taxis, hackneys and limousines and their drivers. Among the specific proposals being developed by the Commission are measures aimed at improving accessibility. I understand that in July 2006 a further consultation process will be undertaken by the Commission in relation to vehicle standards, with a particular emphasis on improving accessibility.
The Sectoral Plan for Transport under the Disability Act 2006 is currently being finalised for presentation to the Houses of the Oireachtas by end July 2006, as required by the Act. The Plan will also set out a programme for action on accessibility in a number of key transport areas, including the taxi and hackney sector.
324 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Transport if he will issue a copy of the report following the naval diving unit dive and examination of a trawler (details supplied). [23744/06]
In regard to the trawler referred to by the Deputy the Naval Service Diving Unit produced a Report to this Department which consisted of videos of the trawler taken by remote operated vehicle and divers and a log of events as they occurred during the search process.
The videos have been forwarded to the family of the deceased skipper of the trawler and I will arrange for a copy of the log of events to be forwarded to the family also.
325 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Transport the number of the 140 decentralised jobs promised to County Galway in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Ballinasloe and Loughrea; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23757/06]
The table shows the number of applications received for each Agency and for this Department in respect of jobs due to decentralise to Galway. The NRA and the RSC have not been identified by the Decentralisation Implementation Group as early movers. Implementation issues, including the identification of accommodation in Ballinasloe, are being pursued by the agencies themselves.
It is expected that the move to Loughrea will be completed by 1st quarter 2007 involving a total of 50 posts in the Road Safety Authority and the Department of Transport. Temporary accommodation is being considered as an interim measure and a suitable site has been identified by the OPW in this regard.
There are 19 eligible Dublin based staff who have applied on CAF to decentralise to Loughrea. The breakdown of the number of Dublin based staff in respect of the Agencies is not available to this Department and is a matter for the Agencies themselves.
|
Agency/Section |
No. of Posts to decentralise |
CAF Applicants |
|
|
Civil Servants |
Public Servants |
||
|
National Roads Authority (Ballinasloe) |
90 |
59 (external) |
6 (external) 1 (internal) |
|
Railway Safety Commission (Ballinasloe) |
20 |
4 (external) |
2 (external) |
|
Department of Transport / Road Safety Authority (Loughrea) |
50 |
69 (external) |
42 (internal) 8 (external) |
|
National Safety Council (Loughrea) |
10 (13) |
24 (external) |
5 (external) |
326 Mr. McHugh asked the Minister for Transport the progress which has been made in relation to a project contained in Transport 21 (details supplied); when works will commence; the timeframe for completion; if it is possible to reduce the timescale for the project from that previously set out; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23306/06]
The current position regarding the Western Rail Corridor is that Iarnród Éireann has, in accordance with Transport 21 which provides for the reopening of the Western Rail Corridor on a phased basis, submitted detailed business proposals to my Department relating to Phase 1 (the reopening of the Ennis to Athenry section) and Phase 2 (re-opening of the Athenry to Tuam section). These proposals have been assessed in my Department and I will be reporting on them to Government shortly.
327 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the statutory instruments which transposed EU Directive 2000/56/EC; if the directive is fully transposed; and the timetable for the full commencement of the provisions of this directive. [23470/06]
Directive 2000/56/EC was transposed into national law by the Road Traffic (Licensing of Drivers) (Amendment) Regulations 2004, S.I. number 705 of 2004. The provisions were commenced on 15 November 2004 and 14 February 2005. Some matters in the Directive that are to be implemented by dates in 2008 and later will be transposed in due course.
328 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Transport the reasons the south Kildare transport initiative does not service the only general hospital in the County, which is Naas General Hospital; if he will investigate the procedure to address this major problem for persons seeking to attend the hospital for clinics or to visit patients and so on and where such persons have to hire taxis due to the lack of public transport; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23712/06]
The Rural Transport Initiative (RTI) is a pilot scheme, under which funding is made available to thirty-four community-based organisations across the country to address the transport needs of their rural areas through the provision of local transport services. South Kildare Community Transport Ltd. is one of the pilot projects being funded under the RTI.
While Pobal administers the RTI on behalf of the Department of Transport, the individual RTI groups are responsible for the operational aspects of the initiative, such as route planning and related matters. My Department has no role in these matters. However, I will convey the Deputy's concerns in the matter to Pobal.
The pilot period for the RTI comes to a close at the end of 2006 and the Minister of Transport, Martin Cullen T.D., has already announced his intention to put the scheme on a permanent footing from 2007 onwards, following a consultation period later in the year to which the public will be invited to respond.
329 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the national average pass rate for the driver theory test in each of the years since its inception; and, if available, to provide the regional breakdown in each of those years. [23713/06]
The table sets out the information requested. The pass rate is not compiled on a regional basis.
|
Year |
Percentage Pass |
|
2001 |
82.15 |
|
2002 |
82.90 |
|
2003 |
82.78 |
|
2004 |
82.72 |
|
2005 |
81.61 |
330 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Transport the reason in the case of a person (details supplied) penalty points were notified on 4 July 2006 almost six months after the speeding offence of 26 January 2006; the plans he has to ensure that the penalty bears some relation in time to the actual offence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23714/06]
Information regarding payment of a fixed charge in respect of an alleged speeding offence by the person concerned on 26 January 2006 was received from An Garda Síochána on 12 May 2006. The information was processed by the company who convert the data to electronic format on 30 May 2006 and was forwarded to the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, who hold and administer the National Driver File, on 2 June 2006 for endorsement of penalty points on the licence record and issue of the notification of penalty points. Such notification issued on 6 June 2006.
331 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Transport if his Department was consulted in advance of the decision of Shannon Foynes Port Company to seek tenders or expressions of interests in portions of Limerick Docks; if his Department expressed support for the decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23804/06]
332 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Transport if an impact study will be required by his Department before a decision to close Limerick Docks will be made; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23805/06]
334 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Transport if his approval has been sought for a proposal from the Shannon Foynes Port Company to sell off Limerick Port; if his approval has been given for such a proposal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23868/06]
335 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Transport his views on whether the proposal to sell off the functioning and profitable port of Limerick is consistent with the objectives of national marine transport policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23869/06]
336 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Transport his views on whether the proposal to sell off the functioning and profitable port of Limerick is consistent with the objectives of stated EU marine transport policy which is to encourage the transport of freight by shipping rather than road; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23870/06]
337 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Transport the steps he intends to take to ensure the continued operation of Limerick Docks in view of its importance to existing users and to the Limerick area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23871/06]
338 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Transport the guidelines or procedures in place where a State owned port company, established under the Harbours Act 1996, proposes to dispose of plans, particularly with regard to ensuring openness and transparency in regard to any transaction and value for money for taxpayers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23873/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 331, 332, 334, 335, 336, 337 and 338 together.
Limerick docks are owned and operated by Shannon Foynes Port Company. The company is a State-owned company established under the Harbours Act 1996. The Act provides that the principal objects of the company include the provision of such facilities, services and lands within its harbour for ships, goods and passengers as it considers necessary. The company is required to take all proper measures for the management, control, operation and development of its harbour.
The company manages six different port installations at various locations within the Shannon estuary and it projects significant increases in the volume of trade within the estuary over the coming years. The company has stated that investment in new modern facilities that can handle bigger ships is required to accommodate this growth in trade in the region. In line with the company's commercial mandate under the Harbours Act 1996, decisions regarding the use of the land within the port estate are primarily a matter for the port company and its board.
The company is required to comply with the Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies, which states that disposals of land must be by competitive tendering, other than in exceptional circumstances. The company's latest annual report for 2005 confirms compliance with the code for that year. These guidelines are in place to ensure that State companies carry out transactions with the maximum openness and transparency with regard to value for money for the taxpayer.
Accordingly, it was not necessary for me to give approval to decisions the company has taken thus far on Limerick docks, nor is an impact study required before a final decision is made. I am aware that on 15 March last Shannon Foynes Port Company announced that it was conducting a strategic review of its property portfolio, which the company states could result in a major expansion and upgrade of its facilities in the Shannon Estuary at a cost of over €100 million.
As part of this Strategic Review the company sought tenders for two sites within the Limerick docks, and has also sought expressions of interest regarding the entire docks. However, no decision has been taken with regard to the sale of lands or indeed the closing of the port facilities within the docks.
Whatever the conclusions of the strategic review, the company has said it will continue to work in partnership with other stakeholders in the region and that a comprehensive consultation will take place in advance of any final decision being made with respect to the future of Limerick docks.
The company has informed me that the port users have already been afforded regular opportunities to interact with the management and Board of Shannon Foynes Port Company since the inception of the Limerick Dockland Initiative. The company states that it has formally met with the Limerick Port Users Group on a number of occasions since 2003.
The Government's Ports Policy Statement from January 2005 outlines that the disposal of non-core assets is a potential source of funding for new port developments. It also identifies as a key challenge the provision of additional port capacity to meet the demands of the growing economy.
A process is underway in my Department to examine future port capacity requirements at a national level, particularly for unitised trade. Seven project proposals to increase capacity have been received from the ports, including one from Shannon Foynes Port Company.
Shannon Foynes Port Company's plans are to increase both short sea and deep sea port capacity within the estuary, and in that sense such plans are consistent with both national and EU maritime transport policy.
333 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Transport if his attention was drawn to the National Safety Council Newsletter of August 2003 which indicated that research into child vehicle occupant fatalities in the period from 1996 to 2000 showed that 77 per cent of child fatalities were not to have been wearing a child restraint or seatbelt; if statistics are currently available to show whether this trend has improved in the period from 2000 to date in 2006; and could he make a statement on the measures being taken to deal with such statistics. [23841/06]
I am aware of the National Safety Council Newsletter of August 2003 referred to by the Deputy which indicated that research into child vehicle occupant fatalities in the period from 1996 to 2000 and showed that 77 per cent of child fatalities were not wearing a child restraint or seatbelt.
The latest report on the wearing of seat belts, the National Roads Authority 2005 Survey of Seat Belt Wearing Rates, was published earlier this year and is available from the NRA. The survey indicates that overall front wearing rates in 2005 improved to 86% (an increase from 84% in 2003, 72% in 2002, and 57% in 1999.) Overall rear seat-belt wearing rates in 2005 was 46%. This is the same as the level estimated in 2003.
A survey was conducted into the seat-belt wearing practice of primary and secondary school-goers and front seat belt wearing rates averaged 70% for children attending primary school (68% in 2003), and 68% for those attending secondary school (62% in 2003).
Rear seat belt wearing rates also improved showing an average of 60% for children attending primary schools (increase from 48% in 2003), and 55% for those attending secondary schools (increase from 44% in 2003).
The driver of a vehicle in which safety belt use is compulsory is responsible for ensuring that passengers under 17 years are restrained by a safety belt or appropriate child restraint. Failure to comply with this requirement is a penalty point offence. The ultimate aim is to have full compliance with seat belt wearing.
The Road Safety Authority (RSA) will have a significant input into advancing the road safety agenda in the future. The functions assigned to the Road Safety Authority include a mandate in relation to the collation of data and statistics as well as policy research and development.
339 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Transport the number of the 450 decentralised jobs promised to County Clare in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Kilrush and Shannon; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [24207/06]
The table shows the number of applications received for the Irish Aviation Authority due to decentralise to Shannon.
|
Agency/Section |
No. of Posts to decentralise |
CAF Applicants |
|
|
Civil Servants |
Public Servants |
||
|
Irish Aviation Authority (Shannon) |
100 |
10 (external) 1 (external) |
2 (internal) |
The IAA has not been identified by the Decentralisation Implementation Group as an early mover. Implementation issues, including the identification of accommodation in Shannon is a matter for the Agency itself to pursue.
The breakdown of the number of Dublin based staff in respect of the Agencies is not available to this Department and is a matter for the Agencies themselves.
340 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if there are grants or funding available for pensioners to install security lights in their gardens and homes in order to improve their safety from anti-social activities; and if he will work with other Departments on this matter. [23370/06]
My Department operates the Scheme of Community Support for Older People, which aims to encourage and assist the community's support for older people by means of a community based grant scheme to improve the security of older people in their own homes.
The Scheme is administered by local community and voluntary groups with the support of my Department and is open to people aged 65 and over who have a genuine need for assistance.
The Scheme provides funding towards the cost of installing external security lighting (front and back), socially monitored alarm systems, door locks, window locks, doors chains and smoke alarms, as well as interior emergency lighting for qualifying older people living on our offshore islands.
The maximum individual grants provided under the Scheme are as follows: €200 in respect of security lighting; €300 in respect of the once-off installation cost of socially monitored alarms; €200 in respect of physical security equipment; €50 in respect of smoke alarms; and €150 in respect of interior emergency lighting for qualifying older people living on our offshore islands.
341 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the number of the 380 decentralised jobs promised to County Donegal in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Gweedore; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to this location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23755/06]
The only issue coming within my remit, which is relevant to the Deputy's Question, is the proposal that 30 Foras na Gaeilge posts be located in Gaoth Dobhair, Co. Donegal. This was announced in Budget 2003, subject to agreement of the North-South Ministerial Council. Agreement on the issue was finalised earlier this year and the Board of Foras na Gaeilge was subsequently asked to bring forward firm proposals in relation to the phases of locating a staff complement of 30 in Gaoth Dobhair, as well as the precise sections and functions to be located there.
I have been informed by Foras na Gaeilge that the issue was discussed at their Board meeting on 8 May 2006 and that it will be discussed further at their next Board meeting which is scheduled for 26 June 2006. I look forward to these proposals being made available shortly after that meeting.
342 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the number of the 80 decentralised jobs promised to County Galway in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Clifden and Furbo; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23757/06]
343 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the number of the 290 decentralised jobs promised to County Mayo in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Knock Airport; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23759/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 342 and 343 together.
The Department's programme for decentralisation to Galway involves relocating 10 posts to Na Forbacha. 7 posts have already relocated there and it is expected that the balance will be in place next year. 6 out of the 11 officers who applied to decentralise to Na Forbacha were located in Dublin.
Pobal is relocating 40 posts to Clifden, 19 of which will be in place in Clifden by the end of August. The selection process to fill a further 2 posts is ongoing. The full complement of staff will be relocated when Pobal's permanent offices are complete, which is expected early in 2008. One post was filled by an officer relocating from Dublin and the remaining posts have or are being filled by way of local recruitment.
As regards decentralisation to Mayo, the Department is committed to relocating 140 posts to Knock Airport. OPW have indicated that the Department's headquarters building will be in place by mid 2008. To further the decentralisation process, 65 posts will be relocated into temporary accommodation in Tubbercurry from next month. Those posts will then be relocated to Knock Airport when the new building is ready.
We have received 145 applications to decentralise to Knock Airport, 48 of which came from officers located in Dublin.
344 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the reason a person (details supplied) in County Tipperary is not being accepted under the rural social scheme. [23292/06]
Participants are allowed to transfer on to the Rural Social Scheme (RSS) from Unemployment Benefit only in those cases where the Unemployment Benefit (UB) refers to a period spent on a Community Employment (CE) Scheme. In these circumstances, the participant must transfer to the RSS within 15 months of the cessation of CE.
In this particular case, the applicant's UB claim is on the basis of a CE Scheme which finished in September 2004 and is, therefore, outside the 15 month limit. Notwithstanding the above, the applicant can re-apply for participation on the RSS after he has exhausted his UB entitlement if he is subsequently in receipt of a qualifying Social Welfare payment.
345 Mr. English asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if there has been a replacement community representative appointed to the implementation team for the National Drugs Strategy, in view of the recent resignation of the previous representative; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23412/06]
A replacement community representative has not been appointed to the National Drugs Strategy Team yet. Prior to the resignation of the previous community representative on the National Drugs Strategy Team, my Department wrote to the Team suggesting that they request the community representatives on both the Regional and Local Drugs Task Forces to consider putting forward a candidate for consideration for appointment as a replacement.
The community representatives recently put forward proposals for discussion and I am currently in the process of considering these with a view to meeting with them in the near future.
346 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs when the requirements of the Language Act will become operational; the requirements that each Department and agency will have to comply with; the resources in place to have contemporaneous publications of Government papers provided; the extra translators recruited for this purpose; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23688/06]
Firstly, I wish to advise the Deputy that, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, all provisions of the Official Languages Act 2003 will come into operation automatically on the 14 July 2006. Consequently, the following provisions of the Act which have yet to be commenced will come into effect on that date:
•Section 7, which relates to the publication of Acts of the Oireachtas simultaneously in both Irish and English.
•Section 8, which relates to the right of a person to be heard and to use the Irish language in court proceedings.
•Section 9(3), which relates to communications by public bodies with the public in writing or by electronic mail for the purpose of providing information.
As the Deputy is aware, the Act seeks to provide a framework and mechanism with a view to ensuring that the State's constitutional obligations with respect to providing public services through Irish are met in a coherent way with progress being achieved in the context of existing resources over time. The Act provides for this to be achieved in three ways:
(i) Through directly applicable provisions of the Act which are applicable to all public bodies, including the provisions outlined above and also, the duty of public bodies under section 9(2), to reply to correspondence — in writing or by electronic mail — in the language in which that correspondence was written.
(ii) Through the agreement of language schemes with individual public bodies that provide for significant improvement in the level of public services available through Irish over time subject to the level of demand; and
(ii) Through Regulations to be made by me as Minister in accordance with the terms of the Act.
To date, I have agreed language schemes with 27 public bodies and have requested a further 70 public bodies to prepare such language schemes.
In relation to the issue of contemporaneous publications of Government papers I assume that the Deputy is referring to the obligations placed on public bodies under section 10 of the Act. Section 10 provides for the simultaneously publication in both official languages of a what is in fact a very limited number of key documents such as annual reports, annual financial statements/ accounts and documents setting out public policy proposals (examples of this last category would include Green Papers and White Papers published by Government Departments).
These are all key documents by which public bodies account back to the general public, to their specific customers and to us as members of the Oireachtas in relation to how they have in the previous year or propose to in future discharge their public functions.
It is the case that many Government Departments and other public bodies do not have translation capacity in-house and that external expertise has to be bought in. As the Deputy will be aware, I have requested Foras na Gaeilge to develop an accreditation system for Irish language translators. This will be the first such accreditation system to be made available for Irish language translators. As part of the system, it is intended that a panel of accredited translators will be established, and I understand the panel will be available to the public and private sectors shortly.
347 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the funding available to local authorities for the erection of flashing amber safety lights at schools; the budget available within his Department for this initiative; if the funds can be used to erect electronic speed limit signs or if it is specifically for flashing amber safety lights; the allocation provided to each local authority in 2005 for this scheme; the number of schools where such lights have been erected to date under the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23852/06]
Under the CLÁR Non-National Roads Measure which operated in 2005 and which was co-funded with the Department of the Environment, Heritage & Local Government, local authorities had the option to install flashing amber safety lights at primary schools. In this regard, nine local authorities funded 52 sets of lights at a cost to CLÁR of €154,177.
I subsequently introduced a fully funded Flashing Amber Safety Lights measure in 2005 for schools without same under CLÁR and all proposals received from the local authorities in the original CLÁR areas were approved at a total cost of nearly €1.7m for 242 schools. Five local authorities claimed €236,531 in respect of 37 completed projects. Any residual projects in the original areas, that may have been inadvertently omitted by the local authorities in the first round, can continue to be submitted.
In May 2006, I announced that funding in the region of €3m for 2006/2007 is being made available for the provision of Flashing Amber Safety Lights at all primary schools in the extended CLÁR areas that do not have some already. This measure is fully funded under the CLÁR programme and all the relevant local authorities have been asked to submit proposals. The maximum cost per set of these lights is €7,000. Should a local authority opt to install electronic speed limit signs with the amber lights, the maximum funding under CLÁR stands at €7,000 towards the cost. My Department is currently examining proposals received and announcements will be made in due course.
Tables A and B respectively detail this information.
|
County |
No. of Primary Schools |
Total Allocation |
Total Amount Claimed 2005 and to date 2006 |
Completed Works |
|
€ |
€ |
|||
|
Cavan |
32 |
248,500 |
||
|
Clare |
13 |
87,500 |
79,719 |
13 |
|
Cork |
42 |
294,000 |
||
|
Donegal |
13 |
91,000 |
||
|
Galway |
26 |
182,000 |
||
|
Kerry |
6 |
42,000 |
||
|
Leitrim |
32 |
224,000 |
98,000 |
14 |
|
Louth |
8 |
53,120 |
45,400 |
8 |
|
Meath |
1 |
7,000 |
6,534 |
1 |
|
Monaghan |
10 |
70,000 |
||
|
Roscommon |
15 |
105,000 |
||
|
Sligo |
32 |
214,500 |
||
|
Tipperary North |
5 |
35,000 |
||
|
Tipperary South |
1 |
7,000 |
6,878 |
1 |
|
Waterford |
2 |
14,000 |
||
|
Westmeath |
4 |
28,000 |
||
|
Total |
242 |
1,702,620 |
236,531 |
37 |
No applications were received from Limerick, Longford and Mayo.
|
County |
No. Primary Schools |
Total Amount Paid |
|
€ |
||
|
Cavan |
1 |
3,500 |
|
Cork |
2 |
7,000 |
|
Donegal |
21 |
56,569 |
|
Galway |
7 |
14,747 |
|
Mayo |
12 |
42,000 |
|
Roscommon |
4 |
13,300 |
|
Sligo |
2 |
6,989 |
|
Tipperary North |
1 |
3,072 |
|
Waterford |
2 |
7,000 |
|
Total |
52 |
154,177 |
348 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie if he will provide a breakdown of all information technology consultancy service and other consultancy services paid for by his Department in 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23915/06]
My Department has made available on its website details regarding consultancies, including information technology and other management-related consultancies (excepting those of minor value), relating to the period since the Department's establishment in June 2002 up to the end of 2005.
The relevant link, which will take the Deputy directly to the information sought by him in relation to details of expenditure paid by my Department in 2005, is: www.pobail.ie/en/ CorporateSupportServices/Finance/Consultancies. For the Deputy’s convenience, I have arranged for a copy of the material in question to be sent directly to him at his Oireachtas email address.
349 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the details of all foreign travel undertaken by his Department or by Ministers in 2005 and to date in 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23916/06]
A breakdown of foreign travel costs (net of insurance and management charges) incurred in respect of official business undertaken by Department Officials, the Minister of State and myself in 2005 and to date in 2006 are set out in the tables.
Detailed information was given at the estimates debate on the provisions for this expenditure and any questions raised was answered. The Committee approved the estimates and all the above expenditure is within the amount approved.
|
EU Institutions |
Other EU Destinations |
Non-EU Destinations |
Total |
|
|
Minister |
3,278.05 |
303.86 |
33,094.06 |
36,675.97 |
|
Minister of State |
2,013.60 |
121.83 |
4,856.09 |
6,991.52 |
|
Department Officials |
12,433.59 |
44,718.22 |
19,733.90 |
76,885.71 |
|
Total |
17,725.24 |
45,143.91 |
57,684.05 |
120,553.20 |
|
EU Institutions |
Other EU Destinations |
Non-EU Destinations |
Total |
|
|
Minister |
0 |
1,165.58 |
21,344.79 |
22,510.37 |
|
Minister of State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Department Officials |
8,737.46 |
10,362.07 |
39,711.08 |
58,810.61 |
|
Total |
8,737.46 |
11,527.65 |
61,055.87 |
81,320.98 |
350 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the number, location and staff grades in his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23917/06]
The number, grades and locations of posts in my Department are as laid out in the table.
|
Grade |
Number |
Location |
|
Secretary General |
1 |
Dublin |
|
Assistant Secretary |
3 |
Dublin |
|
Principal Officer |
11 |
Dublin |
|
2 |
Galway |
|
|
Assistant Principal |
25 |
Dublin |
|
6 |
Galway |
|
|
1 |
Donegal |
|
|
1 |
Kerry |
|
|
Higher Executive Officer |
40.3 |
Dublin |
|
10 |
Galway |
|
|
1 |
Donegal |
|
|
1 |
Kerry |
|
|
Administrative Officer |
6 |
Dublin |
|
Executive Officer |
41.7 |
Dublin |
|
10 |
Galway |
|
|
Staff Officer |
0.6 |
Dublin |
|
2 |
Galway |
|
|
Clerical Officer |
40.4 |
Dublin |
|
15 |
Galway |
|
|
1 |
Donegal |
|
|
1 |
Achill |
|
|
1 |
Kerry |
|
|
Services Officer |
4 |
Dublin |
|
2 |
Galway |
|
|
Senior Agricultural Inspector |
1 |
Dublin |
|
Agricultural Inspector |
1 |
Navan |
|
1 |
Athlone |
|
|
1 |
Donegal |
|
|
1 |
Galway |
|
|
Assistant Agricultural Inspector |
1 |
Kerry |
|
1 |
Kildare |
|
|
1 |
Laois |
|
|
Accountant |
1 |
Dublin |
|
Translator |
1 |
Galway |
|
Maoirseoir Tithe |
2 |
Galway |
|
2 |
Donegal |
|
|
Chief Placenames Officer |
1 |
Kerry |
|
1 |
Dublin |
|
|
Higher Placenames Officer |
2 |
Dublin |
|
Placenames Officer |
2 |
Dublin |
|
Engineer Grade 1 |
1 |
Galway |
|
Engineer Grade 2 |
1 |
Donegal |
|
Ministers Personal Secretary |
1 |
Dublin |
|
Ministers Personal Assistant |
1 |
Galway |
|
Ministers Senior Adviser |
1 |
Dublin |
|
Ministers Media Adviser |
1 |
Galway |
|
Total |
253 |
351 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the road and water schemes that have been assisted by his Department in 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23918/06]
All this information was made public by press releases in 2005. All the press releases are on www.pobail.ie. For the Deputy’s convenience, I am arranging to send to him copies of all the relevant press releases issued in 2005.
352 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the support schemes for the voluntary and community sector that have been developed to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23919/06]
353 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie with reference to economic and social development in rural and disadvantaged areas, the number of community groups in targeted areas participating in the decision making process. [23920/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 352 and 353 together.
The following are the support schemes for the voluntary and community sector provided by my Department. Community Services Programme The Social Economy Programme transferred to my Department on 1st January 2006. I have re-named this Programme the Community Services Programme, to reflect the fact that I have changed the nature of the programme from a labour market training scheme to a scheme to provide support for essential community services. I have also secured an additional €5 million to fund new projects in 2006. Eligible activities include:
—Community Childcare Services
—Community Services for the Elderly (Excluding Health Care Provision)
—Community Services for People with Disabilities (Excluding Health Care Provision)
—Supervising Community Halls & Facilities in disadvantaged communities (RAPID etc.)
—Island Projects
—Rural Tourism-Heritage Centres and Managed Walks
—Community Radio
The overall budget for 2006 is now €42 million.
White Paper funding
Funding under the White Paper on a Framework for Supporting Voluntary Activity and for Developing the Relationship between the State and the Community and Voluntary Sector was published in September 2000. It sets out the rationale for developing the relationship between the State and the sector and the principles, which should underpin this relationship. The White Paper included a wide range of cross-cutting recommendations and a number of funding initiatives detailed as follows:
•Funding Scheme to Support the Role of Federations, Networks and Umbrella Bodies in the Community and Voluntary Sector
The White Paper provided for an allocation of funding over a three-year period to end of 2006 for a scheme to support the role of federations, networks and umbrella bodies in providing support services to their member groups and in representing their interests. There are currently 32 groups being funded in 2006 at an annual cost of €2.6m.
•Funding Scheme for Training and Supports in the Community and Voluntary Sector
The White Paper on Supporting Voluntary Activity recognised that the growth of the Community and Voluntary Sector in recent years has created increased needs for training and supports for the Sector. The White Paper provided for multi-annual Training and Supports Grants. There are currently 20 groups being funded in 2006 at an annual cost of €600,000.
The Department is engaged in a review of funding provided under the White Paper. It is expected that a new Scheme will be advertised later this year.
National Anti-Poverty Networks
The National Anti-Poverty Networks scheme assists National Anti-Poverty Networks to develop their capacities to contribute to policy development at national level and to develop the capacities of the National Anti-Poverty Networks members to draw policy from the experiences at local and national levels. 9 groups are currently being funded at a cost of €1.4m in 2006.
Supporting Volunteering
In 2005 the Department decided to fund an interim three-year package of volunteering initiatives to promote and develop volunteering in Ireland at the local level. Funding in 2006 totalling €954,594 is being provided to 8 Volunteer Bureaux, Volunteer Centres Ireland, Focus Ireland, Boardmatch, Young Social Innovators, and the Community Learning Programme Project. Under the LDSIP, €500,000 has been ringfenced for a range of local volunteering initiatives by Partnership Companies. In addition, €1.4m from the Department's Volunteering Cohesion Fund was provided to County Development Boards (CDBs) in December 2005 for a range of volunteering initiatives; €70,000 from the volunteering Cohesion Fund has also been provided to Carlow CDB in 2006 to date.
Philanthropy
My Department has committed funding to Philanthropy Ireland totalling €300,000 over three years to 2008 for the promotion of philanthropic giving.
Community Development Programme (CDP)
The Community Development Programme (CDP) is designed to reduce poverty and social exclusion in both urban and rural areas through targeting support at disadvantaged and socially excluded communities. €23.95 million has been allocated to the programme in 2006, providing funding to 182 community development projects nationwide.
Funded projects:
•have an anti-poverty focus and promote the participation of people experiencing poverty and exclusion at all levels of the project
•act as a resource within the communities of which they are a part
•are managed by local voluntary management committees made up predominantly of people from the local area/target groups who themselves have experience of disadvantage and social exclusion
•promote co-ordination and co-operation between community, voluntary and statutory groups in their areas.
Some 30,000 people use the services and resources of their local CDP on an annual basis, with 15,000 of these participating in CDP-based training and education courses. CDPs also provide resources/facilities for over 700 local community organisations. These include groups representing lone parents, people with disabilities, the elderly, youth groups, childcare groups and other miscellaneous groups working with disadvantaged communities.
Programme of Grants for Locally-Based Community and Voluntary Organisations
The Programme of Grants for Locally-Based Community and Voluntary Organisations is funded by this Department and operates throughout the country, supporting the activities of local voluntary and community groups who are addressing disadvantage in their community.
The Programme makes funds available for small-scale refurbishment of premises, for the purchase of essential equipment, including I.T. equipment, and for education, training and research. The maximum grant for refurbishment under the 2005 Scheme was €40,000; equipment €10,000; and for training, education and research also €10,000.
The 2006 Programme will be advertised in the coming weeks in the national and provincial newspapers and a copy of the guidelines and application form will be available on the Department's website at that time.
Scheme of Community Support for Older People (CSOP)
The CSOP Scheme is also funded by this Department and aims to encourage and assist the community's support for vulnerable older people, aged 65 years and older, by means of a community-based grant scheme. This Scheme provides funding for door locks, window locks, door chains, security lighting, smoke alarms and towards the once-off cost of installing socially-monitored alarm systems. Any local voluntary or community-based organisation in any part of the country, especially those working with or providing support for older people, can apply to the Department for funding under the Scheme.
RAPID programme
The RAPID programme aims to ensure that priority attention is given to tackling the spatial concentration of poverty and social exclusion within the 45 designated RAPID areas. The priorities for each RAPID area are identified locally by each RAPID Area Implementation Team (AIT), and are incorporated into a plan for each area. Each of the nine Departments represented on the RAPID National Monitoring Committee, which I chair reports on a quarterly basis on progress in relation to the proposals from these plans that fall within their remit.
It is estimated that over €337m has been invested in extra infrastructure in RAPID areas in social provision under the NDP since the programme's inception. In 2004 a new funding mechanism, RAPID Leverage Fund, was introduced which supports small-scale local actions through co-funding with other Departments/Local Agencies. This fund which is administered by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs allows many small-scale actions to be dealt with more effectively at local level. In 2006 a sum of €7.8m was allocated by my Department for these schemes.
LDSIP (Local Development Social Inclusion Programme)
The LDSIP is a series of measures designed to counter disadvantage and to promote equality and social and economic inclusion. The programme is delivered at local level by 38 area partnerships, 31 community partnerships and 2 employment pacts. The following groups are specifically targeted: long-term unemployed, socially and economically disadvantaged women, young people at risk, travellers, people with disabilities, homeless people, ethnic minorities, lone parents, ex-prisoners, low income households.
€48.8 million is being spent on this Programme in 2006.
Dormant Accounts
Disbursements from the Dormant Accounts Fund are designed to tackle economic, social and educational disadvantage and to assist persons with a disability. In line with the commitment in the Dormant Accounts Disbursement Plan, allocations from the Fund are prioritised towards those areas designated as most disadvantaged (i.e. RAPID, Local Drugs Task Force and CLÁR areas). Under the initial round of funding, 521 projects were approved involving a total allocation of approximately €60 million. 84 of these projects are based in CLÁR areas and the allocation in respect of these projects exceeds €10 million.
All of the various programmes, measures and schemes outlined above make due provision for the participation of the communities or targeted groups or individuals in the relevant decision making processes.
354 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the number of town and village renewal projects completed to date; the amount expended on each respective project as outlined in his statement of strategy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23921/06]
While my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has the primary responsibility for the Urban and Village renewal scheme, the position in relation to my own Department is set out in the Appendix.
Appendix
CLÁR Village and Countryside Enhancement Scheme CLÁR supports the joint Village and Countryside Enhancement Scheme operated by the LEADER companies and the local authorities covering small-scale infrastructural projects. Eligible projects include amenity areas and parks, footpaths and walking areas, playgrounds and other recreational facilities, local heritage projects, tidy town projects, public lighting, enhancing streetscapes, church car parks etc. Projects promoted by Sporting Clubs/Organisations, which are outside their mainstream sporting activities and of general benefit to the local community, can also be considered for funding. The funding may also be used for the establishment of farmers' markets or the upgrade of existing farmers' markets in CLÁR areas. The average cost per project is €100,000 funded as follows:
•33.33% to be funded by CLÁR to a max of €33,333
•16.66% to be funded by the LEADER Group to a max of €16,666
•16.66% matching local contribution.
•33.33% to be funded by the local authority.
As per LEADER Operating Rules, voluntary labour and donations i.e. buildings, land etc., can be included as part of the local matching funding. However, 10% of the local contribution must be in the form of cash. In the event of a project costing more than €100,000, the excess private funding can be sourced from either the local contribution and/or the local authority.
Expenditure to date
This expenditure relates to projects approved in 2005 and early 2006 when the maximum cost per project was €30,000. The same percentage funding ratios applied. The increase to €100,000 per project is effective from May 2006.
|
County |
Village |
DED |
Total Cost |
CLÁL |
|
€ |
€ |
|||
|
Cavan |
Mullahoran |
Kilcogy |
30,000 |
10,000 |
|
Gowna |
Scrabby |
30,000 |
10,000 |
|
|
Cork |
Durrus, Glengarriff, Caheragh, Carrignamana and Kilcrohane |
Durrus East, Glengarriff, Caheragh, Rahalisk and Seefin |
120,000 |
10,000 |
|
Galway |
Boyounagh, Dunmore, Clooncun, Milltown, Cleggan, Williamstown |
Boyounagh, Dunmore, Glwnamaddy, Milltown, Silerna, Kilcroan |
144,645 |
10,030 |
|
Kerry |
Brosna |
Brosna |
60,000 |
20,000 |
|
Mayo |
Moygownagh |
Kilfian |
30,000 |
10,000 |
|
Carnacon |
Burriscarra |
45,161 |
10,000 |
|
|
Sligo |
Dromore |
31,646 |
8,312 |
|
|
Tipperary North |
Moyaliffe |
Moyaliffe |
27,240 |
9,080 |
|
Total |
518,692 |
97,422 |
Gaeltacht Village Renewal Programme
The Gaeltacht Village Renewal programme stimulates environmental improvements by upgrading village locations to make them more attractive places in which to live and work, encourage social and economic development and facilitate and support the development of tourism and tourism-related activity. This scheme operates on a 50:50 basis with the Local Authorities. 2005 expenditure to date follows. The 2006 payments will commence shortly.
|
Contae |
Ainm an Bhaile |
2005 |
|
€ |
||
|
Dún na nGall |
Cill Charthaigh |
30,000 |
|
Clochán Liath |
30,000 |
|
|
Dobhar |
7,500 |
|
|
Ailt a Chorráin |
35,000 |
|
|
Loch an Iúir |
9,000 |
|
|
Brockagh |
12,500 |
|
|
Carraig Airt |
30,000 |
|
|
Mín Beannaid |
3,000 |
|
|
Na Dúnaibh |
17,000 |
|
|
Luinnigh |
12,500 |
|
|
An Glaiseach |
1,500 |
|
|
An Fál Carrach |
15,000 |
|
|
An Bun Beag/Droichead an Chladaigh |
50,000 |
|
|
An Charraig |
12,500 |
|
|
Port an Chabhlaigh |
15,000 |
|
|
An Chlochán Liath/Bóthar an tSéipéil |
10,000 |
|
|
An Clochán Liath/Bóthar na Cé |
15,000 |
|
|
Na Machairí |
1,500 |
|
|
An Chlochán Liath/Bóthar an Chairn Mhóir |
11,000 |
|
|
Seirbhísí Pleanála Céimithe agus Tacaíochta |
34,000 |
|
|
Sraith Mháirtín |
67,000 |
|
|
Athnuachán Baile/Sean Dóirí Beaga |
16,000 |
|
|
Gaoth Dobhair — An Bun Beag/Doirí Beaga |
75,000 |
|
|
An Bun Beag |
6,850 |
|
|
Carraig Airt — Sráidbhaile Carraig Airt |
55,500 |
|
|
Contae Mhaigh Eo |
An Geata Mor |
28,250 |
|
Poll an Thomáis (Reilig Nua) |
21,000 |
|
|
Ceathru Thaidhg |
25,000 |
|
|
Cill Ghallagáin, Ceathrú Thaidhg |
21,000 |
|
|
Dumha Eige, Acaill |
25,000 |
|
|
An Geata Mor |
28,250 |
|
|
Contae na Gaillimhe |
Cill Chiaráin |
30,000 |
|
Bearna |
25,000 |
|
|
An Spidéal |
30,000 |
|
|
Leitir Móir |
20,000 |
|
|
Ros Muc (Gort Mór) |
15,000 |
|
|
Carna |
30,000 |
|
|
An Cheathrú Rua |
20,000 |
|
|
Camus |
15,000 |
|
|
Tír an Fhia |
15,000 |
|
|
Trá Mór, Tír an Fhia |
30,000 |
|
|
Na Forbacha |
25,000 |
|
|
An Fháirche |
25,000 |
|
|
Doire an Fhéiche 30,000 |
30,000 |
|
|
Contae Chiarraí |
Baile an Chaladh |
16,350 |
|
Muiríoch |
9,175 |
|
|
An Gleann, Baile an Sceilg |
12,650 |
|
|
Baile an Fhirtéaraigh |
22,750 |
|
|
L5010 Droichead Beag — Crosaire Mhuileann an Daingean |
30,000 |
|
|
L12071 Crosaire Muileann an Daingean — An Cheapaigh |
26,550 |
|
|
Contae Chorcaí |
Baile Mhuirne |
9,000 |
|
Cúil Aodha |
4,000 |
|
|
Cill na Martra |
7,500 |
|
|
Béal Átha an Ghaorthaidh |
12,500 |
355 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the measure that he has put in place or intends to put in place to encourage philanthropy as outlined in his Department's strategy statement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23922/06]
My Department has committed total funding of €300,000 to Philanthropy Ireland over a three-year period to 2008, to support Philanthropy Ireland's programme aimed at promoting the concept and practice of philanthropy and raising the level of awareness of its value and benefit to civil society in Ireland.
Philanthropy Ireland is an association of independent grant-making trusts, foundations and corporations and is a not-for-profit limited company with no share capital and with charitable status. It comprises twenty-five mainly Irish grant-making trusts and foundations, with disbursements to a wide variety of causes and needs and community and voluntary organisations in Ireland.
I hope to be in a position to announce further measures in the near future.
356 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the way in which he intends to ensure democratic legitimacy on local boards appointed to implement development programmes; the boards where such legitimacy has already been ensured; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23923/06]
In furtherance of the cohesion process commenced in 2004 and in line with the Government decision on the review of local and community development structures, City and County Development Boards and Údaras na Gaeltachta were invited to submit proposals during 2005 aimed at achieving county/city coverage by local development agencies and involving, in rural areas, the integration of Leader and Partnership groups. The intention is that, from 2007, there will be one structure delivering services in any given area and fewer structures overall in the country.
The Boards of Partnerships established under the Local Development Social Inclusion Programme are required to have a broad representation of locally based representatives which includes the community and voluntary sectors, statutory agencies, social partners, and public representatives. Arrangements are in place to ensure that Boards maintain a balance level of representation across these sectors during the course of the annual funding cycles and regular reviews.
With respect to the Community Development Programme (CDP), Community Development Projects are required to have a Board structure drawn from the local area within which they operate. This includes representatives of the target groups served by the Project. The Department reviews the composition of Boards regularly and ensures compliance with guidelines on this matter during site visits and ongoing inspection and audit work.
The boards of all local development structures, including any new entities, will be expected to continue to operate in accordance with good governance principles and to have appropriate mechanisms in place to enable accountability to their communities and their funders. To this end, it is intended to address the procedures for the establishment of the boards of the new bodies and their membership in the context of the cohesion process, with particular reference to ensuring that genuine community representation is secured. It is also intended to have public representatives on these boards. It is in this way I see the democratic legitimacy of the local boards being achieved.
357 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 14 June 2006 in which he referred this Deputy to www.pobail.ie the breakdown of the €3,291,000 expended by his Department in 2005 under subhead F3 as outlined in the Revised Estimates for Public Services 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23924/06]
The details sought by the Deputy are set out in the following Table.
|
Purpose |
Amount €000 |
|
€000 |
|
|
Acadamh na hOllscolaíochta Gaeilge and Gaeltacht Outreach Centres |
1,209 |
|
Language Awareness Campaign; Socio-Linguistic Study; Language Planning Initiative |
418 |
|
Miscellaneous small Gaeltacht projects (delegated approvals for Regional Gaeltacht Directors) |
133 |
|
Gaeltacht cultural organisations |
796 |
|
Scéim na gCúntóirí Teanga |
250 |
|
Scéim na gCampaí Samhraidh d’Aos Óg na Gaeltachta |
274 |
|
Miscellaneous |
211 |
|
Total |
3,291 |
358 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the number of the 85 decentralised jobs promised to County Wexford in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to Enniscorthy; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23763/06]
To date 24 Bord Bia staff members have indicated a willingness to relocate to Enniscorthy. Applications have been made by 47 persons from outside Bord Bia for positions in Enniscorthy under the decentralisation programme, of whom 19 are based in Dublin.
Issues relating to the transferability of staff between State Agencies and between the Civil Service, Public Service and State Agencies generally are being examined centrally by the Department of Finance who deal with general human resource and industrial relations issues arising from decentralisation. Bord Bia is not one of the organisations given early mover status under the Government's decentralisation plan and a precise timeframe has not been established.
359 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when the 2006 application for the national reserve should be submitted; the categories to be included; when allocations will take place; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23299/06]
The question of categories for the 2006 National Reserve will be decided in due course following consultations with the Single Payment Advisory Committee which comprises of representatives from the farming bodies, Teagasc, and officials from my Department.
It should be noted that the only mandatory category for 2006 will be Category A which caters for farmers who inherited land or received land free of charge or for a nominal sum from a farmer who had retired or died by 16 May 2005 and who had leased out his/her holding to a third party during the reference period 2000-2002. Category D (new entrants to farming) continues to be a non-mandatory category.
The time frame for allocations under the 2006 National Reserve will depend on the volume of applications to be processed.
360 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the grants which are available for the renovation of agricultural sheds and buildings. [23300/06]
The conversion of existing structures may be eligible for grant aid under either the Scheme of Investment Aid for Farm Waste Management or the Scheme of Investment Aid for the Improvement of Dairy Hygiene Standards provided the estimated cost of conversion to the relevant Specification does not exceed 70% of the cost of an equivalent new structure.
Where conversion is the only feasible option because of space constraints, for example, conversion costs must not exceed the cost of a new structure.
361 Ms Cooper-Flynn asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if an application by a person (details supplied) in County Mayo for the single payments scheme will be considered under the force majeure scheme. [23333/06]
The EU Regulations governing the Single Payment Scheme make no provision for the application of Force Majeure in circumstances where land has not been available to an applicant for at least a 10-month consecutive period in the year of application.
362 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the reason a person (details supplied) in County Cavan has not been awarded their headage and premium as agreed by the appeals office; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23334/06]
The person named applied to the Department in 2002 for a Flock Number. Following an inspection dated 31st March 2003 it was decided that the application could not be processed as it was not in compliance with Article 7 of Regulation EC 1259/1999. The Department were also not satisfied that the applicant's flock was managed independently and therefore the allocation of a Flock Number in this case was denied.
The person named appealed this decision at an oral hearing on 6th July 2004 where the Department explained that the application for a Flock Number was rejected on the grounds that the applicant did not have proper holding facilities which should have conformed to Sections 7, 8, 9 and 11 of the Health and Safety Act of 1989 along with the problem of not having the perimeter stock proofed at the time of inspection.
It was decided following this appeal hearing that, as the applicant had addressed the questions of stock proofing and handling facilities, complied with the EU Regulations and submitted applications for the 2003 and 2004 EU Ewe Premium Schemes in respect of twenty-six and forty-four animals respectively, the Department would issue a Flock Number backdated to December 2002. All monies due to the applicant will issue shortly.
363 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when payment of a beet grant will issue to a person (details supplied) in County Tipperary. [23361/06]
I presume that this Question relates to the compensation package available under the agreement on reform of the EU sugar regime. There are three elements to the compensation package. The first element is the compensation to beet growers of up to 64% of the reduction in the minimum price for beet. This compensation, which will be incorporated in the existing Single Payment Scheme and will be payable from this year, is worth approximately €123m to Irish beet growers over the next seven years.
The second element is the restructuring aid covering the economic, social and environmental costs of restructuring of the sugar industry involving factory closure and renunciation of quota. In Ireland's case, this would be worth up to €145m. This aid is subject to the submission by the processor of an aid application including a detailed restructuring plan for the industry following consultations with the beet growers. Where restructuring takes place in the first year of the new sugar regime, as in Ireland's case, the application must be submitted by 31 July 2006. The third element of the package is the diversification aid, worth almost €44m in Ireland's case, which would be drawn down in the framework of a national restructuring programme.
With regard to the second element of the package, the Council Regulation provides that at least 10% of the restructuring aid shall be reserved for sugar beet growers and machinery contractors. That percentage may be increased by Member States after consultation of interested parties provided that an economically sound balance between the elements of the restructuring plan is ensured. In that context, my Department issued an open call for submissions last month with a closing date of 2 June. These submissions are subject to scrutiny by Indecon International Economic Consultants, who have been appointed by the Government to provide me with independent expert advice on matters relating to the implementation of the restructuring fund. A final decision on the percentage will be made in due course having regard to this advice and the recently-adopted Commission Regulation laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the restructuring aid. Payment arrangements will then be announced.
364 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the subsidies a person (details supplied) in County Sligo is entitled to; the payment issues; the payments outstanding; when payments will be issued; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23425/06]
The person named established 131.47 standard entitlements at a net value of €11.25 each during the Single Payment Scheme reference period. Full payment of €1,434.67 in respect of these entitlements issued to him on 1 December 2005. Prior to 2 August 2000, the herd number was in the name of the late brother of the person named. In accordance with the provisions of the Single Payment Scheme, 65.73 standard entitlements, at a net unit value of €11.27, were established in the name of this late brother. An official from my Department has been in direct contact with the person named requesting him to submit an application for the transfer of his late brother's entitlements by inheritance. As soon as the completed application form is received in my Department, it will be processed immediately.
It is also noted that the late brother of the person named was a participant in the Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS), which, in some cases, required partial de-stocking. My Department is currently reviewing these cases with a view to granting the higher sheep numbers prior to joining REPS in the calculation of Single Payment Entitlements. In this case, the years 1997 and 1998 are being used to re-calculate the entitlements under the Single Payment Scheme and this measure will only be implemented where it proves more financially beneficial. If the inheritance application of the person named is successful he will also inherit these Single Payment Entitlements.
365 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food her proposals placed before the EU Commissioner in Brussels on 17 May 2006 designed to aid and assist the poultry sector here currently facing severe financial hardship as a result of contraction in both the domestic and international markets for poultry meat; if approval has issued for the package of measures tabled; when she intends their implementation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23526/06]
In April the Council of Agriculture Ministers adopted Regulation 679/2006 which provides a legal basis for exceptional market support measures for the poultry sector where there are serious market disturbances directly attributed to a loss in consumer confidence arising from the avian influenza situation. I submitted a proposal to the Commission requesting co-funding and approval for a range of measures to assist those in the industry who suffered financial losses arising from the recent disturbances in the poultry market. These proposed measures included schemes of payment to breeders who had to destroy hatching eggs and reduce their breeding stock capacity, to growers and processors who had to reduce throughputs and to operators who had to carry unusually high stock levels of poultry meat due to a virtual collapse in our export markets.
The Commission has now presented its first outline of a draft regulation for the information of Member States. This draft includes only some of the measures in my proposal. I along with a number of other Member States raised the issue at Council this week and pressed for the extension of the range of measures being considered by the Commission. The matter will come up again for discussion and probable vote at the meeting of the management committee for poultry meat and eggs on 21 June. My delegation to that meeting will present the case for further measures to be included. The Commission will be aiming for consistency across all Member States who have proposed schemes as regards the types of measures that will be allowed and the rates of funding. It is my intention that once any measures are approved by the EU, we will expedite implementation of the appropriate schemes here as soon as possible.
366 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the number of personnel employed in her Department office in Cavan on 1 January 2000; the number there are at the present time; the efforts been made to find alternative work in these offices as some work has ended as a result of single payment scheme and other work has been transferred out; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23527/06]
There were 203 staff working in my Department's Cavan Office on 1 January 2000. Currently, two hundred and twenty eight people work in my Department's office in Cavan, including 57 job sharing staff. These staff are fully engaged in work on Accounts, Legal and Land Services, Livestock Breeding, Integrated Controls, BSE, Scrapie Medicines, District Veterinary Operations, Feed Fertiliser Grain Pigs and Poultry, Beef and Sheepmeat and on the residual processing of the old coupled livestock payment schemes. However, the Department does foresee some changes to the work areas in Cavan arising over the next months into 2007. Overall this will result in a net decrease of up to 25 staff in Cavan or approximately 10%. This will occur through natural wastage and the transfer of staff to offices in other Departments in Cavan.
367 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if the proposals, which she indicated needed to be sent forward to the European Commission, regarding to the nitrates directive, have been submitted to date; the proposals for change to the regulations, which the authorities here have outlined in the said submission. [23541/06]
The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government announced on 18 May 2006 that he had sent proposals for amendments to the Good Agricultural Practice for the Protection of Waters Regulations 2005 to the European Commission for consideration. The proposals, which the Minister has outlined, were developed in conjunction with my Department and with the input of Teagasc and address a range of important issues identified in the Teagasc submission and raised by the farming bodies. I am satisfied that the changes proposed to the Commission will be of major benefit to Irish farmers, in that they will provide them with greater flexibility in complying with fertiliser limits and simplify certain aspects of the Regulations.
368 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath has received their entitlements from the national reserve, following submission of certain additional information as requested; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23542/06]
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the Single Payment Scheme National Reserve under Category D. Category D caters for farmers who commenced farming after 31 December 2002 or who commenced farming in 2002 but who received no direct payments in respect of that scheme year. My Department requested additional information from the applicant, but there is no record of this information having been received in my Department. On receipt of the additional information requested this case will be examined and a formal letter setting out my Department's decision will issue to the person named. If she is dissatisfied with my Department's decision in relation to the National Reserve, she then has the opportunity to appeal this decision to the Independent Payment Appeals Committee. An appeals application form is available from any of my Department's offices or on the Department website at www.agriculture.gov.ie.
369 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the amount of illegal foods confiscated by the inspectors at airports and ports here to date in 2006; the comparable figures for 2005; the respective number of seizures, bags searched and passengers questioned; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23551/06]
370 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the estimated percentage of illegally imported foods which are confiscated at ports and airports here; her plans to place amnesty bins at ports and airports or to train sniffer dogs to identify such products; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23552/06]
371 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food her plans to complete a full risk assessment on illegal food and meat imports into the country; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23553/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 369 to 371, inclusive, together.
Community rules have been established to ensure the protection of animal and public health in the importation of animal products into the EU. These harmonized controls are applied at the main points of entry into the EU at approved Border Inspection Posts (BIP). Importers are required to demonstrate compliance with the requirements that such products have been sourced in approved countries from approved establishments, that they travel with the required health certification issued by the competent authorities of the exporting country and that prior notice of import has been given to the BIP at which entry into the EU is proposed. They also apply in the case of the personal import of animal products from third countries for one's own personal consumption. In such cases they may only be released on to the market where they have undergone BIP control and are accompanied by the Common Veterinary Entry Document (CVED) endorsed by the BIP veterinary officer.
Application of these EU controls is risk based and they are operated in close co-operation with the Customs services. BIPs would also assess for risks and carry out their random controls on consignments based on experience, instances of previous non-compliance in relation to importers, countries of origin, particular animal products as well as on consignments where no declaration of animal product content is provided. Commercial consignments seized at Irish BIPs for return to the country of origin or destruction at the importers expense have been recorded as follows:
|
Year |
Total Number of Seized Consignments |
Total Quantity of Animal Products Seized (kgs.) |
|
2005 |
21 |
37,110.12 |
|
2006 to 31 May |
19 |
56,942.5 |
To enforce its personal import rules the EU has regulated that at all points of entry into the EU a general ban on passengers importing meat and meat products and milk and milk products be applied, that this ban be brought to the attention of passengers and that Member States operate controls on the personal baggage of passengers arriving into the EU at these points. Transport operators who bring passengers from third countries into the EU are required to bring these regulations, including the ban, to the attention of passengers. Announcements are made on airlines and posters are on display at arrivals halls in airports and at the disembarkation points for sea passengers. Amnesty bins have been provided in the main airports for surrender of any animal product that has been inadvertently carried. My Department has put information on to its web site and transport operators, foreign embassies accredited to this country and Irish embassies abroad have been requested to inform travellers to this country and have been invited to include a link to my Department's web page.
Officers of my Department are deployed to carry out passenger interviews and bag searches on a random basis at ports and airports where travellers from third countries arrive. This approach is risk based and is intended to focus on in the identification of passengers coming to this country from third countries as most of these arrive here through hub airports located in other Member States of the EU. My Department is also considering extension of the personal baggage import control through the deployment of a specially trained dog and its handler. The interception of illegal imports from passengers whose journeys commenced within the EU is also carried out. The following activities associated with this deployment have been recorded:
|
Year |
Number of Passengers Interviewed |
Number of Bags Searched |
Number of Food Seizures |
Quantity Seized (kgs.) |
|
2005 |
58,884 |
14,183 |
1,175 |
5,156.75 |
|
2006* |
30,278 |
6,739 |
792 |
4,310.5 |
*To 31 May 2006.
The Commission also monitors operation of personal import controls by the Member States through its Food and Veterinary Office (FVO). It is considering proposals including the introduction of a requirement for a written declaration to be made by each third country originating passenger concerning meat and milk products in their personal possession and extending the personal import ban to cover egg and egg products. Currently import of such animal products are banned under the EU Safeguard Decisions imposed wherever outbreaks of high pathogenic avian influenza are suspected or have occurred in third countries.
372 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the reason the value of the entitlements allocated to a person (details supplied) in County Mayo from the national reserve were so low when the person had expected to receive a higher entitlement value; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23669/06]
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the Single Payments Scheme National Reserve under category C. Category C caters for farmers who, between 1 January 2000 and 19 October 2003, sold the milk quota into the Milk Quota Restructuring Scheme and converted their enterprise to a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia or Arable Aid Schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000 to 2002.
The intention under this category is to compensate farmers who, having disposed of their milk quota, were unable to avail of the new dairy premium element of the Single Payment Scheme which was introduced for the first time in 2004, decoupled from production on 31 March 2005 and added to the existing Single Payment. The allocation represents the difference between the Single Payment established and the potential Single Payment that would otherwise have been established if the dairy premium element was included. Where the existing Single Payment established for such farmers is greater than the Single Payment they would otherwise have established had they remained in milk production and got the benefit of the decoupled dairy premium, then no allocation can be made from the National Reserve.
A formal letter setting out my Department's decision has issued to the person named and if he is dissatisfied with my Department's decision in relation to the National Reserve he now has the opportunity to appeal this decision to the Independent Payment Appeals Committee. An appeals application form is available from any of my Department's offices or on the Department website at www.agriculture.gov.ie.
373 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the position with an application for single farm payment from the national reserve for persons (details supplied) in County Galway; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23806/06]
The persons named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the Single Payments Scheme National Reserve under Category B and Category C. Category B caters for farmers who, between 1 January 2000 and 19 October 2003, made an investment in production capacity in a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia and /or Arable Aid schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000 — 2002. Investments can include purchase or long term lease of land, purchase of suckler and/or ewe quota or other investments.
Category C caters for farmers who sold their milk quota into a re-structuring scheme between 1 January 2000 and 19 October 2003 and who converted to a farming sector for which a direct payment under the Livestock and/or Arable Aid Schemes would have been payable in respect of the years 2000 to 2002. It should be noted that the rules governing the Single Payment Scheme stipulate that an applicant who is found to be eligible under more than one category in the Reserve may only receive an allocation of entitlements under whichever category is most beneficial.
A formal letter setting out my Department's decision has issued to the persons named and if they are dissatisfied with my Department's decision in relation to the National Reserve they now have the opportunity to appeal this decision to the Independent Payment Appeals Committee. An appeals application form is available from any of my Department's offices or on the Department website at www.agriculture.gov.ie.
374 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the year standard costings her Department is using when calculating grant aid on the new 60 percent farm pollution grant scheme; if such standard costings are based on 2004 prices; if so, if her attention has been drawn to the increase in roofing, concrete, iron, welding and contractor costs over the past two years; if farmers now being approved for grant aid under this new scheme will have their grant aid based on 2006 standard costings; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23808/06]
My Department's current standard costings are being used in the calculation of grant aid under the revised Farm Waste Management Scheme. These costings, introduced in 2004, are under review to take account of price adjustments in the interim period. Revised standard costings will be introduced as soon as possible, following completion of the review.
375 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food further to Parliamentary Question No. 234 of 29 September 2004, the grant aid returned to her Department by the company; the grant aid paid to the company in the past 10 years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23831/06]
My Department, in conjunction with Enterprise Ireland, has been examining the position regarding contingent liabilities arising from the closure of the plant at Rooskey, Co. Roscommon. Discussions are on-going between Enterprise Ireland and the Company on the possible level of liability arising from the decision to discontinue the slaughtering and boning activities at Rooskey, while retaining and developing the cannery operations from the Rooskey site, and having regard to the company's other investment plans. As the issues are complex, the discussions and examination have taken some time but it is anticipated that they will reach a conclusion in the near future and where any amounts are identified as due the process of recovery will follow.
376 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when she intends to publish the animal health Bill; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23833/06]
Work on drafting the Animal Health Bill is proceeding in my Department. There is still a significant body of preparatory work to be completed and it is not possible at this stage to indicate a date for publication.
377 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will extend the closing date under the land purchase annuities redemption scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23853/06]
The current discounted buy out scheme for Land Purchase Annuities is governed by the Land Purchase Annuities Redemption Scheme Regulations 2005 (SI No 830 of 2005). These regulations provide that the scheme commences on 1 January 2006 and terminates on 30 June 2006. I have no plans to extend the closing date.
378 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food further to her reply to Parliamentary Question No. 258 of 17 May 2005, if the same regulations are applied on the import of lamb direct from the UK or via Northern Ireland from the UK; the inspection procedure in place to ensure the regulations are complied with; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23854/06]
379 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food further to her reply to Parliamentary Question No. 258 of 17 May 2005, if the same regulations are applied on the import of lamb direct from Northern Ireland; if the Northern Ireland authorities have a derogation to these regulations, and if so, the restrictions to ensure that such a derogation is not abused; the inspection procedure in place to ensure that the regulations are complied with; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23855/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 378 and 379 together.
EU legislation governing intra-community trade in sheep prescribes the conditions for trade which vary by reference to the category of sheep involved. For all categories it is a requirement that a veterinary inspector must be satisfied, inter alia, that the sheep were resident on the holding of origin for 30 days (21 days for slaughter sheep) and that no sheep were moved onto the holding during the previous 21 days. However, as part of the development of an all-island animal health strategy, a derogation is applied from these requirements in the case of trade in sheep to and from Northern Ireland which are for immediate slaughter.
There is no derogation from the requirement that all sheep for intra-community trade must be accompanied by the necessary intra-community health certification. I understand that specific measures are operated by the Northern Ireland authorities to control the movement of sheep into Northern Ireland from other parts of the United Kingdom and, under EU rules, sheep from Great Britain may be imported legitimately into this State provided they are accompanied by the necessary intra-community health certification.
380 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if payment will be made of all monies due to a person (details supplied) in County Kerry in relation to single payment; the details of all their payments to be paid in 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23856/06]
The person named has 24.03 Single Payment entitlements. An eligible hectare of land must be declared for each entitlement held to receive maximum payment. The person declared 22.58 hectares of eligible land on his 2005 Single Payment application and was paid on 22.58 entitlements.
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the Single Payments Scheme National Reserve, under category D. Category D caters for farmers who commenced farming after 31 December 2002, or who commenced farming in 2002 but who received no direct payments in respect of that scheme year.
A formal letter setting out my Department's decision issued to the person named and my Department's records indicate that an appeal was submitted by him on 9 May 2006. The Independent Payment Appeals Committee will carry out a full review of the case and will correspond directly with the person named following the outcome of their review.
It should be noted that to date the National Reserve Section of my Department has received 927 appeals.
381 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if the national reserve application for a person (details supplied) in County Limerick has been examined; and the position regarding this application. [23863/06]
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the 2005 Single Payment Scheme National Reserve under Category B.
Category B caters for farmers who, between 1 January 2000 and 19 October 2003, made an investment in production capacity in a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia and/or Arable Aid schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000-2002. Investments can include purchase or long term lease of land, purchase of suckler and/or ewe quota or other investments.
The Regulations governing the Single Payment Scheme provide that checks must be made to ensure that an allocation from the National Reserve, to an applicant who has already benefited under other measures associated with the Single Payment Scheme, does not result in double benefit. An applicant may only benefit from the measure that is most beneficial. The person named has already benefited from another measure (New Entrant during the reference period). Each such case has to be examined individually to see which measure is the most beneficial. My Department is currently examining all such cases and will write to the person named as soon the examination is completed.
382 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare in relation to a submission by the human resources directorate of the Irish Prison Service to his Department regarding professional added years for pension purposes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23378/06]
The Irish Prison Service is bound by the guidelines for the award of added years for pension purposes as provided by the Department of Finance.
I have been informed that information was sought by the Irish Prison Service, in the first instance, from the Public Appointments Service in relation to the terms of recruitment of the officer concerned in order to ascertain whether he is eligible to be credited with Professional Added Years.
I can now advise the Deputy that following receipt of this information, a submission was sent to the Department of Finance for observations. That Department has now advised the Irish Prison Service that the essential requirements of the competition from which this individual was appointed would not have precluded anyone from being appointed by the age of thirty i.e. in sufficient time to acquire the maximum service of thirty years required for optimum superannuation benefits.
Accordingly, the person in question (or anyone else appointed from the same competition) is not entitled to an award of professional added years. I understand from the Irish Prison Service that the person has been advised of the situation.
383 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if, in view of the recent administrative error on the part of the US Government in failing to request the permission of his Department to transport a military prisoner through Shannon Airport, he has made or will make enquiries as to whether similar administrative omissions have been made in the past; the number of applications for permission to transport prisoners via Irish airspace or facilities which have been made by the US Government since 2001; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23703/06]
My colleague, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, on 13 June, gave the House a detailed account of the matter referred to by the Deputy. This followed a meeting with the US Ambassador on 12 June, at which the Ambassador conveyed his deep regret for the breach of procedures, and confirmed his authorities' determination that the use of Irish airspace and airports by the US be completely transparent and in conformity with Irish law and the wishes of the Government. On the basis of discussions with the US authorities, there is no reason to believe that the incident in question was other than an isolated one. The Minister for Foreign Affairs has, however, formally asked for a written report from the US Embassy on the matter.
There is no record in my Department of any applications for permission to transport prisoners via Irish airspace or facilities by the US Government since 2001.
384 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of the 230 decentralised jobs promised to Roscommon Town in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23761/06]
The Land Registry is scheduled to decentralise two hundred and thirty posts to Roscommon and the organisation is actively pursuing its decentralisation implementation programme. I understand that negotiations by the Office of Public Works on the acquisition of a site for the permanent accommodation are at an advanced stage and construction is scheduled to be completed in mid-2009. Accordingly, no staff have been decentralised to Roscommon to-date.
In order to move matters forward, the Land Registry has requested the Office of Public Works to identify suitable temporary accommodation for the Land Registry in Roscommon town which would accommodate a small advance party of staff. Once the Land Registry receives confirmation of the extent and date of availability of the proposed temporary accommodation, it will be in a position to commence the actual decentralisation of staff to Roscommon without further delay.
On an ongoing basis, the Land Registry has been undertaking the process of making formal offers to staff, both internal and external, who have expressed an interest in decentralising to Roscommon. To-date, a total of seventy-five people across the Civil Service have accepted offers of decentralisation to Roscommon with the Land Registry. Of these seventy-five, twenty-two are currently Dublin based.
385 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he has established if the Gardaí at any level were advised in advance of the planned bomb attack on the Sinn Féin offices in Monaghan in March 1997 which was known to members of the RUC special branch and British Army intelligence for some time before the attack took place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23821/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that they were not advised in advance of a planned bomb attack on the Sinn Féin offices in Monaghan in March 1997.
386 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will provide a report detailing the number of applications for EU residency permits which have been received each year in the past five years; the number of those applications which were concluded within a six month period; the number which took longer than six months for a decision; the length of the waiting period for those that took longer than six months; the number which have currently been waiting more than six months for a decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23294/06]
387 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will provide a report listing the countries of origin of applicants for EU residency permits; the number of applications granted per each country of origin; the number denied for each country of origin; the number of those still awaiting a decision; the number of those that have taken longer than six months for a decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23295/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 386 and 387 together.
Article 18 of the EC Treaty lays down the right of every citizen of the Union to move freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the EC Treaty and by measures adopted to give it effect.
The rights of Union citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States are set out in Directive 2004/38/EC which was adopted on the 29 April, 2004. This directive codifies in a single instrument the complex legislative provisions and the case law on free movement and residence. This directive was transposed into Irish law by the European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) Regulations 2006 which came into force with effect from 28 April, 2006.
The detailed information required by the Deputy, including a report listing the countries of origin of applicants for EU residency permits, is not maintained in the format requested. This would require an inordinate amount of time to obtain and an inappropriate expenditure of limited resources.
The statistical data that is readily available is set out in the tabular statement below and only relates to cases where the application was made in writing to my Department (the data does not include persons who report to their local registration office to register and obtain the appropriate permission to remain).
|
Year |
Applications received |
Applications processed |
Approved |
Refused |
Could not be processed |
|
2001 |
220 |
183 |
137 |
024 |
22 |
|
2002 |
288 |
361 |
211 |
125 |
14 |
|
2003 |
288 |
239 |
176 |
063 |
23 |
|
2004 |
355 |
374 |
251 |
077 |
46 |
|
2005 |
757 |
568 |
366 |
181 |
21 |
There are a number of applications that have not been processed within the stipulated six month time frame laid down in the Directive. There are a number of reasons for this, including a failure on the part of applicants to provide the required documentation within the specified time frame.
388 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of an application for EU residency submitted by a person (details supplied) in October 2005; the reason a decision on the application has taken longer than the six months set by EU Directive; and when the person can expect a decision. [23296/06]
In order to avail of the Free Movement of Persons Directive a national of a non Member State married to a citizen of the Union must be lawfully resident in a Member State when he moves to another member State to which the citizen of the Union is migrating or has migrated. This principle has been established by the European Court of Justice in a ruling dated 23 September, 2003.
The person concerned has recently been informed that he is not a person who can avail of the Free Movement of Persons Directive as he was illegally resident in another Member State prior to his arrival in Ireland.
Notwithstanding this fact his residency application requires further consideration before a decision is reached.
389 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on transferring a person (details supplied) from Cork Prison either to Clover Hill or to Mountjoy; his plans to improve the visiting facilities for Cork Prison; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23329/06]
The person referred to is serving cumulative sentences totalling 22 months for assault causing harm and handling stolen property. He was committed to custody on 22 September, 2005 and is due for release on 17 February, 2007. I am advised that this person has been subject to numerous disciplinary reports since his committal to prison custody for incidents such as fighting, assaulting prisoners, possession of mobile phones and damaging prison property. He was transferred from the Midlands Prison to Cork Prison on 7 June, 2006 after being found in possession of a mobile phone. I am not inclined to approve a transfer for this person back to either Cloverhill Prison or Mountjoy Prison.
While there are no plans at present to spend additional capital on improving the visiting area of Cork Prison, the Deputy will be aware of plans for a major prison development on Spike Island, Co Cork. It is intended that this new facility will offer significant improvements in a number of areas.
390 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason for amending the Gaming and Lotteries Act 1956 in view of the fact that over 800 people will become unemployed from an association (details supplied) as a direct consequence; and if his attention has been drawn to the fact that 23 out of 25 EU Member States have a regulated casino sector. [23331/06]
The Gaming and Lotteries Act 1956 prohibits casino-type operations, and I am strongly of the view that there should be no departure from settled policy in this area.
As I already indicated in an earlier Parliamentary Question (No. 409 on 4 April 2006) I have concerns about the enforceability of the present law as it applies to casino-style operations and the scope for use of such operations for money-laundering. There has been concern for some time about the scope that casinos offer for money laundering and the concealment of the proceeds of crime. This was highlighted in a recent report of an evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) — the leading international anti-money laundering organisation — of Ireland's anti-money laundering legislation and other measures. In that Report, the FATF evaluation team expressed their concern and stated that ". . . . . this system [of private clubs operating as casinos] does create the potential for real AML/CFT (Money Laundering/Financing of Terrorism) risks.
I also indicated in that reply that I intended to bring forward proposals for further changes to the gaming and lotteries legislation that will facilitate the prosecution of offences and the closing down of establishments engaged in such illegal operations. It is my intention to seek Government approval within the next few weeks for these changes, to be included, by way of Committee Stage amendments to the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006.
My officials recently met with representatives of The Gaming and Leisure Association of Ireland in connection with this matter and the Association made a written submission to the Department following that meeting; in both those contexts the matters referred to in the Deputy's question were raised.
391 Mr. McHugh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the process available to a person (details supplied) who is the parent of an Irish child to enable them to remain here. [23332/06]
The Immigration Division of my Department has recently been in contact with the person concerned requesting particular documentation. On receipt of this documentation, a decision will be made on his case.
392 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when the provision of Garda closed circuit system will be implemented for the city of Kilkenny; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23344/06]
As the Deputy is aware Kilkenny is one of the 11 remaining locations nationwide which form part of the Garda CCTV programme. Following recommendations from the Garda authorities, I have approved the implementation of six new Garda CCTV systems. With the addition of these 6 new locations a total of 17 Garda Town Centre CCTV Systems, including Kilkenny, will be implemented in the following locations: Athlone, Ballyfermot, Carlow, Castlebar, Clondalkin, Clonmel, Drogheda, Dungarvan, Ennis, Kilkenny, Kinsale, Mullingar, Portlaoise, Sligo, Tallaght, Tullamore and Waterford.
As I have indicated previously I am anxious to accelerate the implementation of this CCTV programme and reduce as far as possible the workload of the Garda Síochána in this regard. I believe that the answer is to outsource the installation of Garda CCTV systems to the greatest extent possible, making use not only of the technical but also of the project management expertise in the private sector.
In recent months the Garda Síochána have conducted a thorough examination of all aspects of Garda involvement in CCTV Systems. Following this review, I have recently received a comprehensive and innovative proposal for the project management and the outsourced service provision of Garda CCTV systems, including Kilkenny, from the Garda Commissioner.
The Garda authorities wish to commence the initial public procurement process and I am also anxious to proceed urgently with this comprehensive request for tender to source the best CCTV service possible for Kilkenny and the other 16 locations selected. This will happen in conjunction with Section 38 of the Garda Síochána Act, 2005, which provides a legislative basis for the operation of CCTV in public places.
My Department is currently in consultation with the Department of Finance with a view to proceeding as quickly as possible with the procurement process to contract the project managers and outsourced service providers for the development, installation and management of these CCTV systems.
My ambition is to have a Garda CCTV system operating in Kilkenny and in the other locations, at the earliest opportunity, subject to compliance with relevant procurement legislation and procedures.
393 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the remission potentialities relating to sexual assault offences. [23357/06]
In general, prisoners are entitled to remission totalling one quarter of the sentence imposed by the Courts. There are exceptions to this rule, for example, life sentenced prisoners and persons serving sentences of less than one month, which do not attract any remission. The Courts are aware of the statutory entitlement to remission when passing sentence.
394 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will make a statement on sentencing patterns in the area of sexual assault offences. [23358/06]
The Courts are, subject only to the Constitution and the law, independent in the exercise of their judicial functions. The traditional approach to sentencing is for the Oireachtas to lay down the maximum penalty and for a court having considered all the circumstances of the case to impose an appropriate penalty up to that maximum. This approach reflects the doctrine of the separation of powers. The Executive lays down the possible punishment range but it is for the Courts to decide the punishment to be applied to the offender taking account of the seriousness of the crime and all the circumstances of the case and of the offender.
Statistics are, of course, compiled by the Courts Service, in relation to the business transacted by the Courts including, inter alia, sentencing, but it is recognised that more focussed information than is at present available is needed to inform sentencing policy. To this end, the Board of the Courts Service has established a Steering Committee chaired by Mrs Justice Susan Denham with the task of planning and providing a system of information about sentencing. The work of the committee is still underway.
395 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the schedule being followed in respect of the introduction of anti-social behaviour orders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23382/06]
As the Deputy will be aware the Criminal Justice Bill 2004 which is awaiting Report Stage in this House contains provisions to deal with anti-social behaviour. The Bill, as agreed by the Select Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights on 14 June 2006, empowers a senior member of the Gardaí to apply to the District Court by way of a civil procedure for an order which will prohibit an adult from behaving in an anti-social manner. Specially tailored provisions, fully integrated into the Children Act 2001, are being provided for young people engaged in anti-social behaviour.
The enactment of this Bill is a top priority and I hope to see it complete its passage through the Dáil and Seanad without any undue delay. Once the Bill is enacted I intend to consult (as provided for in section 1 of the Bill) with the Commissioner of the Garda Síochána before commencing the provisions relating to anti-social behaviour. The purpose of these consultations is to ensure that the Gardaí have the systems and personnel in place to operate these provisions and that any necessary arrangements about, for example, training for Gardaí in relation to these provisions, will have been addressed.
396 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of intoxilysers held by An Garda Síochána; the location of such equipment within each Garda division; the number of Gardaí trained in the use of this equipment within each division and their location; the cost of an intoxilyser; the cost of training a member of the force to use such equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23384/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that there are sixty four evidential breath testing instruments (intoxilysers) in use by An Garda Síochána. The location of each is set out in the following table.
|
Station |
|
Ashbourne |
|
Athlone |
|
Ballina |
|
Baltinglass |
|
Bandon |
|
Bantry |
|
Belmullet |
|
Birr |
|
Blanchardstown |
|
Bray |
|
Bridewell, Cork |
|
Bruff |
|
Buncrana |
|
Cahirciveen |
|
Carlow |
|
Carrick on Shannon |
|
Carrickmacross |
|
Castlebar |
|
Cavan |
|
Clifden |
|
Clonmel |
|
Donegal |
|
Drogheda |
|
Dun Laoghaire |
|
Dundalk |
|
Dungarvan |
|
Ennis |
|
Ennistymon |
|
Galway |
|
Glenties |
|
Gorey |
|
Gort |
|
Henry Street, Limerick |
|
Kanturk |
|
Kells |
|
Kilkenny |
|
Killarney |
|
Kilrush |
|
Letterkenny |
|
Longford |
|
Loughrea |
|
Macroom |
|
Mallow |
|
Midleton |
|
Monaghan |
|
Mullinga |
|
Naas |
|
Nenagh |
|
Newcastle West |
|
Pearse Street, Dublin |
|
Portlaoise |
|
Roscommon |
|
Santry, Dublin |
|
Sligo |
|
Store Street, Dublin |
|
Terenure, Dublin |
|
Thurles |
|
Tralee |
|
Trim |
|
Tuam |
|
Tullamore |
|
Waterford |
|
Wexford |
|
Wicklow |
I am further informed that the number and locations of personnel trained in the use of the Evidential Breath Testing Instruments as at the 15 June, 2006 are set out in the following table.
|
Station |
Total |
|
Abbeyfeale |
1 |
|
Anglesea St, Cork |
20 |
|
Arklow |
1 |
|
Ashbourne |
13 |
|
Athlone |
26 |
|
Ballina |
15 |
|
Ballinagh |
1 |
|
Ballinasloe |
2 |
|
Ballingarry |
1 |
|
Ballybay |
1 |
|
Ballymote |
1 |
|
Ballymun |
5 |
|
Ballyshannon |
1 |
|
Ballytore |
1 |
|
Ballyvourney |
1 |
|
Baltinglass |
12 |
|
Banagher |
1 |
|
Bandon |
26 |
|
Bangor Erris |
1 |
|
Bantry |
13 |
|
Barrack St, Cork |
2 |
|
Belmullet |
14 |
|
Birr |
11 |
|
Blackrock |
3 |
|
Blacksod |
1 |
|
Blanchardstown |
47 |
|
Boherbue |
1 |
|
Bray |
24 |
|
Bridewell, Dublin |
3 |
|
Bridewell Cork |
29 |
|
Bruff |
15 |
|
Buncrana |
15 |
|
Bundoran |
1 |
|
Cahirciveen |
15 |
|
Callan |
1 |
|
Carlow |
17 |
|
Carna |
1 |
|
Carrick-on-Shannon |
18 |
|
Carrick-on-Suir |
3 |
|
Carrickmacross |
16 |
|
Castleblayney |
1 |
|
Castlebar |
29 |
|
Castlecomer |
1 |
|
Castlerea |
14 |
|
Castletown |
1 |
|
Castletownbere |
3 |
|
Cavan |
28 |
|
Clifden |
11 |
|
Cloghan |
1 |
|
Clonakilty |
2 |
|
Clonmel |
23 |
|
Clontarf |
4 |
|
Cloone |
2 |
|
Coachford |
2 |
|
Collooney |
1 |
|
Coolock |
2 |
|
Harcourt Square, Dublin |
1 |
|
Crookstown |
2 |
|
Crossmolina |
1 |
|
Delvin |
1 |
|
Donegal Town |
15 |
|
Donnybrook, Dublin |
3 |
|
Drogheda |
39 |
|
Dromod |
1 |
|
Dublin Castle |
48 |
|
Dun Laoghaire |
9 |
|
Dundalk |
44 |
|
Dungarvan |
27 |
|
Durrus |
1 |
|
Enfield |
1 |
|
Enniscrone |
1 |
|
Ennis |
36 |
|
Ennistymon |
16 |
|
Ferbane |
2 |
|
Fermoy |
8 |
|
Fitzgibbon St, Dublin |
4 |
|
Galway |
46 |
|
Glantane |
1 |
|
Glenamaddy |
1 |
|
Glengarriff |
2 |
|
Glenties |
11 |
|
Gorey |
23 |
|
Gort |
10 |
|
Hacketstown |
1 |
|
Harcourt Tce, Dublin |
1 |
|
Henry St, Limerick |
43 |
|
Holycross |
1 |
|
Howth, Dublin |
2 |
|
Kanturk |
20 |
|
Kells |
18 |
|
KIlcormac |
1 |
|
Kilkenny |
17 |
|
Killaloe |
1 |
|
Killarney |
20 |
|
Kilmainham |
1 |
|
Kilmallock |
2 |
|
kilmeedy |
1 |
|
Kilrickle |
1 |
|
Kilrush |
13 |
|
Kinnegad |
1 |
|
Kinsale |
3 |
|
Letterkenny |
36 |
|
Lisdoonvarna |
2 |
|
Longford |
18 |
|
Loughglynn |
1 |
|
Loughrea |
15 |
|
Macroom |
8 |
|
Malahide |
3 |
|
Mallow |
13 |
|
Manorhamilton |
1 |
|
Mayorstone, Limerick |
4 |
|
Meelin |
1 |
|
Midleton |
30 |
|
Mill Street |
1 |
|
Miltown Malbay |
1 |
|
Mohill |
3 |
|
Monaghan |
35 |
|
Mountjoy |
2 |
|
Muinebeag |
1 |
|
Mullingar |
32 |
|
Naas |
35 |
|
Nenagh |
14 |
|
New Ross |
1 |
|
Newcastle West |
14 |
|
Newmarket |
3 |
|
Newtown Cashel |
1 |
|
Omeath |
1 |
|
Oylegate |
1 |
|
Pearse St, Dublin |
84 |
|
Portarlington |
2 |
|
Portlaoise |
33 |
|
Portroe |
1 |
|
Portuma |
2 |
|
Raheny |
4 |
|
Rathmore |
1 |
|
Ring |
2 |
|
Roosky |
2 |
|
Roscommon |
28 |
|
Roxboro Road, Limerick |
4 |
|
Rush |
1 |
|
Santry, Dublin |
28 |
|
Shannon |
4 |
|
Shannonbridge |
1 |
|
Shinrone |
1 |
|
Skreen |
1 |
|
Sligo |
34 |
|
Store St, Dublin |
63 |
|
Stradone |
1 |
|
Stuake |
1 |
|
Swords |
2 |
|
Taghmon |
1 |
|
Tallow |
1 |
|
Terenure |
14 |
|
Thurles |
20 |
|
Toomevara |
1 |
|
Tralee |
27 |
|
Trim |
14 |
|
Tuam |
20 |
|
Tullamore |
19 |
|
Tullow |
1 |
|
Waterford |
21 |
|
Wexford |
39 |
|
Whitehall |
5 |
|
Wicklow |
26 |
|
Youghal |
1 |
I am further informed that there is no cost to the Garda Vote for the provision of intoxilyzers. The Medical Bureau of Road Safety, which is under the aegis of the Department of Transport, is responsible for the provision of intoxilysers and their ongoing maintenance.
Training in the use of the intoxilyzers is provided by the Garda in-service training school in conjunction with the Medical Bureau of Road Safety. This training is carried out at the in-service training school offices in Harcourt Square as part of their regular training programme.
The cost for training members is calculated from the expenses incurred in transferring the member to the training centre and the costs of instructors from An Garda Síochána and the Medical Bureau of Road Safety over the two day training period. Calculating for a standard class of twelve participants, taking an estimated average expense incurred in transferring the member to the training centre and the cost of the instructors, the total cost of training each member is estimated at €650.
I am further informed that no additional costs are included in the Garda Vote for the provision of the training.
397 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a green card will issue to a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23385/06]
I refer to my reply of 9th March 2006 to Parliamentary Question No. 195 and advise the Deputy that the case of the person in question is still under consideration. Officials from my Department have recently corresponded with the legal representatives of the person concerned to further process the residency application. On receipt of a reply to that request for information further considerations will be made on the application for renewal of his permission to remain in the State.
398 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of an application to remain in the State in the name of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; and if he will expedite a response in the matter. [23386/06]
The person in question arrived in the State on 18 January, 2001 and applied for asylum. Her application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal by the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.
Subsequently, in accordance with the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended, she was informed by letter dated 31 December, 2003, that it was proposed to make a deportation order in her case. She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of making representations to the Minister setting out reasons why she should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State, leaving the State before the deportation order is made or consenting to the making of a deportation order.
The person's youngest daughter and son arrived in the State on 5 October, 2005 and were re-united with their parent. This person's case file, including all representations submitted, will be considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended, and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (Prohibition of Refoulement). I expect the case file to be passed to me for decision in due course.
399 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the plans he has to introduce specific legislation to penalise those who are guilty of attacks on health care workers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23387/06]
419 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on new legislation which would give additional protection to emergency workers that come under attack from persons while doing their job; if his attention has been drawn to a similar range of additional penalties that exist in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23743/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 399 and 419 together.
As the Deputy will be aware the Criminal Justice Bill 2004 which is awaiting Report Stage in this House makes specific provisions in relation to attacks on emergency workers. Section 182 of the Bill as amended by the Select Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights amends section 19 of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994. Section 19 currently provides for specific offences relating to assaulting or obstructing a peace officer, that is, a member of the Garda Síochána or the Defence Forces or prison officers acting in the execution of their duty. Section 182 of the Criminal Justice Bill expands the definition of ‘peace officers' to include members of the fire brigade.
In addition the Bill further amends section 19 in order to create specific offences of threatening, assaulting, resisting, wilfully obstructing or impeding doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, pharmacists, other health service workers and any persons assisting them in or at a hospital. The penalties in relation to an offence under section 19 of the 1994 Act are also being increased. The maximum penalty for assault or threats to commit assault will be a fine and/or 7 years imprisonment. The maximum penalty in relation to wilful obstruction or impeding health service workers will be a fine of €2,500 and/or 6 months imprisonment.
Although the law already provides for a range of assault type offences, I believe the special demands of acting in an emergency situation necessitate explicit statutory protection for this essential group of workers and those assisting them. That is why I brought forward my proposals to extend the existing offences relating to assaulting or obstructing peace officers to other workers providing emergency services. I am pleased that the Select Committee agreed my proposals on 14 June 2006.
I am concerned that ambulance personnel acting in the execution of their duty outside the hospital environment should be comprehensively covered by these special statutory provisions. Accordingly I intend to bring forward a Report Stage amendment to include ambulance personnel in the definition of "peace officer". This will put them on the same footing and give them the same protection as members of the Garda Síochána and the Defence Forces and prison officers. I am aware that an Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill is currently before the Parliament of the United Kingdom and also that the Scottish Parliament enacted similar legislation last year.
400 Mr. English asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the plans he has to introduce a gratuity recognition scheme for peace commissioners, reflecting the workload of each peace commissioner; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23421/06]
Peace Commissioners are appointed under section 88 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1924. The Office of Peace Commissioner is an honorary appointment and Peace Commissioners receive no remuneration or compensation by way of fees or expenses for their services. At present the powers and duties of Peace Commissioners consist primarily of taking statutory declarations, witnessing signatures on documents for various authorities and signing certificates and orders under various Acts. However, while I have no plans to amend the legislation in the immediate future, the current legislation will, like all my Department's legislation, be kept under review.
401 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress which has been made on the deeds for a person (details supplied) in County Sligo as the file was sent to research the property; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23423/06]
I understand that the Land Registry has forwarded the information requested directly to the Deputy. I would like to refer the Deputy to my letter of 26 May, 2006 to members of the Oireachtas regarding a new service for T.D.s and Senators concerning the current status of Land Registry/Registry of Deeds applications. As outlined in my letter, the service was introduced, inter alia, to provide a speedier and more cost effective alternative to submitting Parliamentary Questions.
402 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress made on an application by a person (details supplied) in County Sligo; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23427/06]
The position in relation to granting long term residency is as follows: persons who have been legally resident in the State for over five years (ie: 60 months) on the basis of work permit/work authorisation/work visa conditions may apply to the Immigration Division of my Department for a five year residency extension. In that context they may also apply to be exempt from employment permit requirements.
I understand the application from the person concerned was received in the Immigration Division on the 2nd June 2006 and will be dealt with in chronological order. It is noted that the person's permission to remain will expire on the 22nd July 2006. While the application for long term residency is being processed, the person concerned should ensure that her permission to remain is kept up to date at all times.
403 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress made on a naturalisation application by a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23428/06]
An application for a certificate of naturalisation by the person referred to by the Deputy was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department in May 2006 and has been assigned reference no. 68/2687/06. Applications received in the first half of 2004 are currently being processed and there are approximately 9,000 applications awaiting processing before that of the person in question. It is likely that processing of the application of the person in question will commence in the second half of 2008. I will inform the Deputy and the person concerned when I have reached a decision on the application.
404 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress made on a naturalisation application by a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23429/06]
An application for a certificate of naturalisation by the person referred to by the Deputy was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department in May 2006 and has been assigned reference no. 68/2688/06. Applications received in the first half of 2004 are currently being processed and there are approximately 9,000 applications awaiting processing before that of the person in question. It is likely that processing of the application of the person in question will commence in the second half of 2008. I will inform the Deputy and the person concerned when I have reached a decision on the application.
405 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 1055 of 29 September 2004, if he will report on the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23439/06]
I have nothing further to add to my reply to Question No. 184 of 1 March 2006 other than to confirm that the implementation advisory group is continuing its work to oversee the steps necessary towards a new system for civil legal costs.
406 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the outcome of his recent meeting with the families of a victim of under age sexual assault; if as a result of this meeting, he has identified initiatives which could be put in place to better support the victims and families in such cases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23536/06]
I can inform the Deputy that I had an hour long meeting with the family referred to which was very useful. However, as the Deputy will appreciate the meeting was a private one and I do not propose to comment on it further.
407 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding a visa application for a person (details supplied) in County Louth; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23537/06]
A visa has been recently approved in respect of the person concerned to enable them enter and reside in the State with their spouse who is working and residing in Ireland.
408 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when an application for a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath in relation to section 49 of the Land Registry Act, will be dealt with; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23545/06]
I understand that the Land Registry has forwarded the information requested directly to the Deputy. I would like to refer the Deputy to my letter of 26 May, 2006 to members of the Oireachtas regarding a new service for T.D.s and Senators concerning the current status of Land Registry/Registry of Deeds applications. As outlined in my letter, the service was introduced, inter alia, to provide a speedier and more cost effective alternative to submitting Parliamentary Questions.
409 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will investigate the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8 who has applied for permission to remain here; and the position in relation to this case. [23558/06]
The person in question applied for permission to remain in the State on the basis of having an Irish born child prior to 1 January 2005, in accordance with the revised arrangements announced by me on 15 January 2005.
It is a requirement under the revised arrangements that each applicant is resident with their child on a continuous basis since the child's birth and that evidence of such residence be provided with each application. The person in question has not provided satisfactory evidence of being continuously resident in the State since his child was born on 14 May 2003. He has stated on his application that he entered the State on 16 November 2004, eighteen months after the birth of his Irish born child. As he failed to meet the criterion of continual residence in the State following the birth of his child, his application for permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements was refused.
This information was communicated to the applicant on 30 November 2005. A further letter to the person concerned containing this information was issued on 18 January 2006. When this person's immigration status is being reviewed, he will then have an opportunity to make representations as to his continued presence in the State.
410 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason a person (details supplied) in County Clare received four penalty points instead of two for a minor speeding offence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23585/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that the Department of Transport was notified in duplicate of the payment of the fixed charge for this speeding offence. Two penalty points were allocated on foot of each notification i.e. a total of four penalty points. I am assured that the matter is being rectified as a matter of urgency.
411 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his plans to establish a national guardianship register for unmarried fathers; if legislation is required to establish such a register; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23660/06]
I have no plans to establish a national guardianship register for unmarried fathers.
412 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the design, planning, tendering and other requirements that must be undertaken in order to proceed with his plans to construct a prison complex on Spike Island in Cork Harbour; the status of these plans and requirements; if plans for the complex have been drawn up; the amount of land that will be required for the prison complex; the estimated cost; when he expects to begin construction; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23661/06]
I have instructed the Office of Public Works (OPW) to prepare the relevant planning procedures including an assessment of the environmental and related issues arising to enable the construction of a bridge to the island. I am advised by the OPW that this planning process will have commenced by August next. As soon as the planning requirements are complete it is intended to commence construction of the bridge which will take about 18 months to complete. The commissioning of the bridge will facilitate the development of new prison facilities on the island to replace the existing outdated accommodation at Cork Prison.
The contracts for the bridge and the prison facilities will be placed following public tender competitions and I have instructed the OPW to prepare the design and other works which are required prior to the issue of the tender for the construction of bridge. Outline plans for the island prison facilities are being developed at present and these will be finalised later this year. I am not, at this stage in a position to give an estimate of the amount of land required for the prison development or the costs of the project as this will be the subject of a public tender competition.
413 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if his attention has been dawn to the circumstances where gardaí who do not hold a B driving licence are driving in the performance of their duties as members of the Garda, as a result of having secured authorisation from a chief superintendent; the number of gardaí within the force to which this situation applies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23684/06]
As the Deputy will be aware, a class "B" driving licence is the standard licence for cars and vans. Members of An Garda Síochána are not permitted to drive official vehicles of these types unless they hold at least a full class "B" licence, whereupon they may be authorised by Divisional Officers or Chief Superintendents to do so, subject to being otherwise deemed suitable. This is known as "Chief's Permission".
414 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a dealing in the Land Registry Office will be completed for a person (details supplied) in County Mayo. [23685/06]
I understand that the Land Registry has forwarded the information requested directly to the Deputy.
I would like to refer the Deputy to my letter of 26 May, 2006 to members of the Oireachtas regarding a new service for T.D.s and Senators concerning the current status of Land Registry/Registry of Deeds applications. As outlined in my letter, the service was introduced, inter alia, to provide a speedier and more cost effective alternative to submitting Parliamentary Questions.
415 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason Garda personnel serving in the Gaeltacht areas of Donegal, Mayo and Cork are ineligible to avail of a Gaeltacht bonus for providing a service in Irish; the further reason Garda personnel in the Gaeltacht areas of Galway and Kerry are so eligible; if he will make arrangements to have this situation examined and rectified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23695/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities, who are responsible for the detailed allocation of resources, including personnel, that when the Gaeltacht allowance was introduced in 1934, it was decided that it would only be paid in areas where Irish was the general medium of speech and where all the members of the force were proficient in Irish and were required to perform their duties in Irish. The areas where the allowance was to be paid were determined on the basis of Districts. These are Garda administrative areas, each comprising a number of Garda Stations, under the supervision of a Superintendent. It was not regarded as practicable to arrange for members of the force in any particular Station to conduct all their duties in Irish if Irish was not also in use at the District Headquarters.
Garda Districts in the Division of Galway West were approved by the Government for payment of the Gaeltacht allowance in 1934, followed by Garda Districts in the Divisions of Donegal and Kerry in 1935. No other Districts have been approved for payment of the allowance since that date.
The arrangements for the payment of Gaeltacht allowances are among the issues being examined at present by an Interdepartmental Group on the use and promotion of the Irish language in An Garda Síochána, particularly taking into account the needs of Gaeltacht areas and the requirements of the Official Languages Act 2003. This Group consists of senior representatives of An Garda Síochána, my Department and the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs. I expect to receive the report of the Interdepartmental Group shortly, and I will carefully examine whatever recommendations are made.
416 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of flak and anti-stab jackets available to Gardaí in County Mayo; the number of such jackets available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23696/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities, who are responsible for the detailed allocation of resources, that there are 33 Ballistic vests on issue to the Gardaí in the Mayo Garda Division ten (10) of which have both ballistic and anti-stab properties.
I have been further informed by the Garda authorities that a total of 1,946 Ballistic vests are available to Gardaí nationwide. A Request for Tender (RFT) for the supply and delivery of 2,100 Ballistic Vests with anti-stab properties was published in the EU Journal and the Government's tendering website on 6th April, 2006. A total of 9 proposals were received which are currently being evaluated by An Garda Síochána. These lightweight and flexible vests will be worn generally as an outer garment but can be concealed under a jacket/coat and will be navy blue in colour.
In addition, an RFT for the supply of a further 11,000 Anti Stab Ballistics Vests and without prejudice or commitment to purchase a further quantity of no more than 4,000 over the duration of the contract, was published in the EU Journal and the Government's tendering website on 8th May, 2006 with a closing date for receipt of tenders of 21st June, 2006.
It is intended that the acquisition of these vests will provide for the personal issue of anti-stab ballistic vests to all members of the Force.
417 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a dealing (details supplied) in the Land Registry Office will be completed. [23708/06]
I understand that the Land Registry has forwarded the information requested directly to the Deputy.
I would like to refer the Deputy to my letter of 26 May, 2006 to members of the Oireachtas regarding a new service for T.D.s and Senators concerning the current status of Land Registry/Registry of Deeds applications. As outlined in my letter, the service was introduced, inter alia, to provide a speedier and more cost effective alternative to submitting Parliamentary Questions.
418 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí working in community policing in Dublin City and County in each year over the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23742/06]
I have been informed by the Garda Commissioner that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána rose to a record 12,641 on 8 June 2006 with the attestation of 273 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 (all ranks) as at 30 June 1997 and represents an increase of 1,939 (or 18.1%) in the personnel strength of the Force during that period.
I have been further informed by the Garda authorities that the personnel strength of each Community Policing Unit in the Dublin Metropolitan Region and in the Balbriggan District as at 31 December, 2000 to 2005 (inclusive) was as set out in the table hereunder.
|
Station |
00 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
|
Pearse St. |
10 |
12 |
11 |
11 |
15 |
11 |
|
Harcourt Tce. |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
Kevin St. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
|
Kilmainham |
5 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
|
Donnybrook |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
|
Irishtown |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
Crumlin |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
|
Sundrive Rd. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Rathfarnham |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
|
Tallaght |
20 |
20 |
22 |
24 |
24 |
20 |
|
Rathmines |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Terenure |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
|
Santry |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
Whitehall |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
Ballymun |
6 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
9 |
|
Coolock |
6 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
|
Malahide |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
Swords |
3 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
|
Raheny |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
|
Clontarf |
4 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
|
Howth |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
|
Blanchardstown |
11 |
19 |
18 |
19 |
17 |
17 |
|
Cabra |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
|
Finglas |
9 |
13 |
9 |
9 |
13 |
12 |
|
Lucan |
4 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
|
Leixlip |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
Ballyfermot |
9 |
8 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
|
Clondalkin |
8 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
16 |
|
Ronanstown |
11 |
9 |
12 |
13 |
16 |
13 |
|
Rathcoole |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Store St. |
20 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
24 |
26 |
|
Fitzgibbon St. |
14 |
15 |
14 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
Mountjoy |
8 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
13 |
|
Bridewell |
14 |
14 |
13 |
15 |
14 |
15 |
|
Dún Laoghaire |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
|
Dalkey |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
Kill-O-Grange |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Cabinteeley |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
|
Bray |
5 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
Shankill |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
Greystones |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
Blackrock |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
|
Dundrum |
4 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
|
Stepaside |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Balbriggan |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
It is the responsibility of Garda management to allocate Community Gardaí on a priority basis in accordance with the requirements of different areas. These personnel allocations are determined by a number of factors including demographics, crime trends, administrative functions and other operational policing needs. Such allocations are continually monitored and reviewed along with overall policing arrangements and operational strategy. This ensures that optimum use is made of Garda resources, and that the best possible service is provided to the public.
I should add that the current recruitment drive to increase the strength of the Garda Síochána to 14,000 members, in line with the commitment in the Agreed Programme for Government, is fully on target. This will lead to a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,000 by the end of this year. The first group of newly attested Gardaí under this accelerated recruitment programme came on stream in March and the second such group did so on the 8th of June. Further tranches of approximately 275 newly attested Gardaí will follow every 90 days thereafter until the programme is complete.
The Garda Commissioner will now be drawing up plans on how best to distribute and manage these additional resources, and in this context the needs of Community Policing will be given the fullest consideration.
420 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if the completed file arising from a fresh Garda investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of a person (details supplied) and which has recently been forwarded to the Garda Commissioner will be made available to the spouse of the deceased or to their solicitor. [23753/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that a review of the investigation file into the collision referred to by the Deputy has been completed by a Garda Superintendent, and a copy of the resulting investigation file has been forwarded to the Law Officers for consideration.
I am further informed that Garda investigation files relating to road traffic accidents are not made available. However, an application may be made to the local District Officer (Superintendent) for the supply of an abstract of the Garda report, copies of statements of witnesses and sketches or maps of the scene of the accident.
421 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if a person (details supplied) in County Sligo will be given leave to apply for asylum here. [23803/06]
I wish to advise the Deputy that the case of the person concerned falls under the terms of the Dublin II Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No. 343/2003. Consequently, I wish to preface my reply by briefly explaining the workings of this Regulation.
The Dublin II Regulation is intended to prevent the phenomenon of 'asylum shopping' across Europe and sets out criteria for determining which Member State is responsible for examining an asylum application where applications have been lodged in more than one State. At the same time it guarantees applicants that one State will process their application, thereby preventing the creation of 'refugees in orbit', a situation which had pertained in Europe prior to the introduction in 1995 of its predecessor, namely the Dublin Convention. Under the Dublin Convention, and now the Dublin II Regulation, the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) can, on the basis of relevant criteria, request another State to accept responsibility for an asylum application and have it processed in that other State.
The person concerned lodged an asylum claim in this State on 3 March, 2006. Following investigation, it was determined by the ORAC that, pursuant to the provisions of the Dublin II Regulation, the United Kingdom was the appropriate State to process the application as the person concerned had previously been issued a visa in Islamabad on 12 September, 2005, to enter the United Kingdom, which was valid up to 9 March, 2006. He entered Heathrow Airport, London on this visa on 7 October, 2005.
Article 9.2 of the Dublin II Regulation provides, inter alia, that 'Where the asylum seeker is in possession of a valid visa, the Member State which issued the visa shall be responsible for examining the application for asylum—'. The U.K. Authorities accepted the transfer of the person concerned pursuant to the terms of Article 9.4. of the Dublin II Regulation which provides, inter alia, that 'Where the asylum seeker is in possession only of one or more residence documents which have expired less than two years previously or one or more visas which have expired less than six months previously and which enabled him actually to enter the territory of a Member State, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall apply for such time as the applicant has not left the territories of the Member States.'
The person concerned claimed asylum in this State using a different name and date of birth than that which appeared on his British visa document. The person concerned was offered an opportunity to appeal the determination of the ORAC, to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, but did not do so. The person concerned was kept informed of developments throughout the course of his asylum application in this State and was made aware as soon as it was possible to do so that his case came under the terms of the Dublin II Regulation.
Following the acceptance by the United Kingdom of responsibility for the case of the person concerned, a Transfer Order was signed in respect of him on 7 June, 2006. This Order was issued to the person concerned on 15 June, 2006, requiring him to present himself to the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB), 13-14 Burgh Quay, Dublin 2, on 20 June, 2006, to make arrangements for his transfer to the United Kingdom. The enforcement of the transfer order is now an operational matter for the GNIB.
In accordance with the provisions of the Dublin II Regulation, the United Kingdom, and not Ireland, is responsible for examining the asylum claim of the person concerned. As a result, it is not my intention to grant the person concerned any period of leave to reside here. Given that the person concerned had been issued a visa to enter the United Kingdom and not Ireland, it is entirely appropriate that he be transferred to that State.
422 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will provide the information requested in Parliamentary Questions No. 88 of 10 May 2006 and No. 452 of 23 May 2006 in relation to the number of non-Irish, non-British European Union nationals released from prison in each of these years from 2000 to 2006; and the number of such released prisoners considered for deportation and subsequently deported under section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999. [23816/06]
423 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will provide the information requested in Parliamentary Questions Numbered 84, 85, and 86 of 10 May 2006 and in Parliamentary Question Number 453 of 23 May 2006 in relation to the number of non-Irish national prisoners released, consequently considered for deportation and deported subsequent to release under section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 for each of the years since 2000 to date in 2006. [23817/06]
I can inform the Deputy that the information sought is being compiled. The provision of this information is complicated by two factors. Firstly, two data sources — the Irish Prison Service and the Garda National Immigration Bureau — must initially compile and then cross reference data from separate recording systems. Secondly, records are not maintained in such a way as to conveniently access the specific data requested in respect of previous years. I can assure the Deputy, however, that there will be no unavoidable delay in providing the available information to him.
424 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reasons for the delay in appointing a judge to the bench of the eastern circuit where a vacancy has existed for over 12 months; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23818/06]
425 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason for the delay in appointing a judge to the bench of the northern circuit where a vacancy has existed for over six months; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23819/06]
Where a vacancy exists in a Circuit for a permanent judge the President of the Circuit Court assigns a judge to the Circuit on a temporary basis. This is the position at present in the Eastern and Northern Circuits.
The permanent assignment of a Judge to a particular Circuit is a matter for Government. It is open to serving Circuit Court Judges to seek assignment or transfer to a vacant circuit and expressions of interest have been received by me from a number of judges in relation to these vacancies.
The Government will shortly be giving consideration to the matter of the assignments in question.
426 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of arrests for the sale of illegal substances; the convictions as a result of such arrests; the type of illegal substances that caused the arrests; the quantity of such substances seized in each of the Garda stations within the Carlow Kildare division the Gardaí for each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23822/06]
It has not been possible, within the timeframe available, to collate the information required by the Deputy. I will contact the Deputy directly when the information is to hand.
427 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of arrests and convictions for each of the Garda stations within the Kildare and Carlow division of the Gardaí for each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23823/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities that the information requested by the Deputy is not readily available and is currently being researched. I will contact the Deputy again when the information is to hand.
428 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of an application for citizenship for a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23829/06]
A declaration of acceptance of Irish citizenship as post-nuptial citizenship was received from the person referred to in the Deputy's question on 26 November 2004.
I informed the Deputy in response to Parliamentary Question No 553 of 21 February 2006 that officials in the Citizenship Section of my Department had written to the person concerned on 5 August 2005 seeking additional documentation and information in relation to the declaration. Delivery of the letter could not be effected and the letter was returned to the Department marked "gone away, no forwarding address." On 25 April 2006, the wife of the person in question provided a new address and the letter was re-issued on 15 May 2006 to that new address. To date, a reply to this letter has not been received. Processing of the declaration cannot continue until my officials received the documentation and information which has been sought.
429 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status in respect of residency and work permit eligibility in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23845/06]
I would refer the Deputy to my Reply to Dáil Question No. 469 of 31 January 2006. The position is relation to the person concerned is as set out therein.
The person concerned continues to be classified as having evaded his deportation. The effect of the deportation order is that he must leave the State and remain thereafter out of the State.
The enforcement of the deportation order remains an operational matter for the Garda National Immigration Bureau.
430 Mr. Carey asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8 will be granted permission to remain in the State on the grounds that they are the parent of an Irish born child; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23846/06]
The person in question applied for permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements for non EU national parents of Irish children born prior to 1 January 2005, commonly referred to as the IBC/05 scheme.
It is a requirement under the IBC/05 scheme that each applicant is resident with their child on a continuous basis since the child's birth and that evidence of such residence be provided with each application. The person in question has not provided satisfactory evidence of being continuously resident in the State since his child was born on 24 September 2004. As he failed to meet the criterion of continual residence in the State his application for permission to remain in the State under the IBC/05 scheme was refused. This information was communicated to the applicant on 12 August 2005. A further letter to the applicant's solicitor containing this information was issued on 25 August 2005.
As a result of a recent court settlement the person in question has made further representations to be allowed remain in the State. These representations will be considered in the context of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 and will be dealt with in due course.
431 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will take steps to have an application for registration in the Land Registry Office by a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath expedited; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23847/06]
I understand that the application concerned was completed on 13 June, 2006 and that the Land Registry has already forwarded this information directly to the Deputy.
I would like to refer the Deputy to my letter of 26 May, 2006 to members of the Oireachtas regarding a new service for T.D.s and Senators concerning the current status of Land Registry/Registry of Deeds applications. As outlined in my letter, the service was introduced, inter alia, to provide a speedier and more cost effective alternative to submitting Parliamentary Questions.
432 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of arrests for drinking and driving offences in each of the Garda stations of the Kildare and Carlow division of the Garda for each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23848/06]
433 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of arrests for traffic offences where the use of alcohol was a determining factor in each of the Garda station areas within the Kildare and Carlow division of the Garda for each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23849/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 432 and 433 together.
I am informed by the Garda authorities that the numbers of arrests for drinking and driving offences in the Carlow/Kildare Division for each of the past five years are set out in the following table:
|
Year |
Number |
|
2002 |
619 |
|
2003 |
665 |
|
2004 |
821 |
|
2005 |
740 |
|
2006* |
318 |
*2006 figures are up to 31 May 2006.
434 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of traffic offences that warranted the issuing of penalty points in each of the Garda station areas of the Kildare and Carlow division of the Garda since the inception of the penalty points system; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23850/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities that from the commencement of the penalty points system in October 2002 to 31 May 2006, 21,341 traffic offences warranted the issuing of penalty points in the Carlow/Kildare Division.
435 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Garda checkpoints set up for drinking and driving offences and penalty points offences in each Garda station area of the Kildare and Carlow division of the Garda for the past five years and since the inception of the offences for penalty points; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23851/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities that the information requested by the Deputy is not readily available and is currently being researched. I will contact the Deputy again when the information is to hand.
436 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of persons reported missing each year since 1995 to date in 2006 who have since been accounted for and who it was suspected or confirmed were the victims of crime; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23864/06]
437 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of persons reported missing each year from 1995 to date in 2006 who had a known history of psychiatric illness; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23865/06]
438 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if, further to Parliamentary Question No. 159 of 2 February 2006 and his statement (details supplied), he has identified an existing service that the Missing Persons Helpline could be provided as an add on to; the efforts he has made to identify such a service; his views on the need for the re-establishment of a missing persons helpline to accommodate the needs of missing persons and their families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23866/06]
439 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the services which are available for the families of missing persons; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23909/06]
440 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the amount of money allocated to services connected with searching for and seeking information on the whereabouts of missing persons each year from 1995 to date in 2006; the way in which this funding was spent; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23910/06]
441 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the amounts expended by his Department in funding the Missing Persons Helpline during its operation; the dates between which this funding was expended; if this money was provided directly to the Missing Persons Helpline or indirectly through another organisation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23911/06]
442 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of persons reported missing each year since 1995 to date in 2006 who have been accounted for as deceased; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23912/06]
443 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the purpose of the report commissioned by his Department and carried out by the Department of Social Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, at the end of 2003 regarding the Missing Persons Helpline; if he will implement all recommendations contained in that report; the consideration he has given to service provision for missing persons and their families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23913/06]
445 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the persons who were accounted for as having died during their time as missing persons of those reported missing between 1995 and 2006; the official causes of death; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23941/06]
446 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the amount of money used to fund the report commissioned by his Department to review the Missing Persons Helpline, as conducted by the Dublin Institute of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, in 2003; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23942/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 436 to 443, inclusive, and 445 and 446 together.
Funding of €110,000 in respect of a National Missing Persons Helpline, made available by my Department in 2002 and 2003, was channelled through the Victim Support organisation, an independent, non-governmental organisation with charitable status. This funding was in addition to the ongoing funding that that organisation received for the provision of services to victims of crime. This funding was provided subject to the conditions that no funding beyond the year 2003 should be implied and audited accounts should be provided to my Department on a calendar year basis. To date, no audited accounts have been received in my Department.
The Victim Support organisation received financial support from my Department from 1985 to 31 March 2005, during which period almost €5.5 million was made available.
The Missing Persons Helpline operated from the headquarters of Victim Support alongside Victims Support's own helpline for victims of crime. The conditions under which the Department provided funding did not include any requirements concerning the operational activities of the Helpline, such as the strategy of the Helpline. Any decision relating to the operation of the Helpline were made by Victim Support which managed the operation of the Helpline in conjunction with the Helpline itself.
As a matter of good practice in the handling of public money, my Department required that an independent evaluation of the Helpline should be undertaken after the first year of its operation and submitted to my Department. The operational details in relation to the evaluator and costings were a matter for Victim Support.
In March 2005, I decided that continued funding of the Victim Support organisation could no longer be justified due to serious concerns in relation to governance, accountability for public funds and poor service levels, after a lengthy period of instability within the organisation. I understand that Victim Support closed down its headquarters operation during 2005 and that a number of staff were made redundant, including the person employed to operate the Missing Persons Helpline. My Department had no role in the decision of Victim Support to make a number of its staff redundant, other than to insist that statutory requirements (notice, holiday pay, etc.) be met and that the interests of the staff be protected.
Also in March 2005, I established a new Commission for the Support of Victims of Crime to devise an appropriate support framework for victims of crime into the future and to disburse funding for victim support measures. The Commission is entirely independent in its decision making and examines each application on its merits. The Commission received an application from Missing in Ireland Support Service for €71,600 to establish, staff and operate a helpline for missing persons. After careful consideration of the application the Commission decided to offer funding of €25,000. However, this offer was rejected by the Missing in Ireland Support Service. It should be borne in mind in this context that the Commission is charged with funding support services for victims of crime, and that, while some persons who are missing are crime victims, most are not.
It remains open to the Missing In Ireland Support Service to make an application to my Department for assistance if they so wish. I have been advised by the Commission that no request has been made to them by the Missing in Ireland Support Service to review the funding as allocated in 2005 nor for funding in 2006.
The disappearance of any person is traumatic for their family and friends, and for this reason I am anxious to assist them in any way I can. I am of the view that a helpline for this purpose is best set up on an independent basis and by a non-official, voluntary organisation. Any proposals for funding for such a purpose which are made to my Department will be carefully considered on their merits.
The Missing Persons Bureau in Garda Headquarters is responsible for maintaining data relating to missing persons. All cases of a person reported missing in suspicious circumstances remain open and under ongoing review and investigation until the person is located or, in the case of a missing person who is presumed drowned, a verdict to that effect by the coroner.
At present, local Garda management take direct responsibility for missing person cases, and special investigation teams are appointed as necessary. All missing persons are recorded on the PULSE system. When a person is reported missing, the local Garda Superintendent will appoint an investigation team to include any specialised unit deemed necessary, for example, the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation or the Technical Bureau. The systems put in place by An Garda Síochána to manage and deal with reports of missing persons are in line with best international police practice, and Garda management have assured me that they are satisfied that the systems in place are adequate to deal with any reported case of a missing person.
I have been informed by the Garda authorities that the investigations into the whereabouts of missing persons are undertaken as part of normal duties and that separate cost entries are not established to track the cost of missing person investigations.
An Garda Síochána interacts fully and as appropriate with all of the media outlets — print, radio and TV — in highlighting cases involving missing persons. The services of other external agencies such as Interpol and Europol are also available to assist in the investigation. In addition, every Garda District has a specially trained search team that is familiar with the locality. The investigation of missing persons is a dedicated subject on the curriculum at the Garda College, Templemore, and is also a subject covered in in-service training.
The Garda authorities are continuously monitoring international developments in relation to investigations of missing persons in order to ensure that best practice is followed. If their professional judgement is that some change in the existing legislation, protocols or structures would be of assistance in improving investigations, this would be considered by me.
I have been informed by the Garda authorities that the number of untraced persons recorded at the end of 2005 was 395. I regret that it has not been possible in the time available to obtain the specific statistics requested by the Deputy. I will revert to the Deputy in relation to this matter when the information becomes available.
444 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the level of funding provided to non-governmental organisations by his Department each year between 1995 and to date in 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23914/06]
I wish to inform the Deputy that the information sought is not readily available and could only be obtained by the application of a disproportionate amount of staff time and resources.
However, I can inform the Deputy that since 1995 my Department has made substantial funding available to areas of Irish life in which non-governmental organisations operate. For example, as can be seen from the Justice Vote for 2006, €37.406m has been allocated in respect of such areas as grants to National Women's Organisations, Equality Proofing, Violence Against Women, Gender Mainstreaming and Positive Action for Women, Childcare, the Status of People with Disabilities, Disability Projects and Services to Victims of Crime.
447 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Education and Science the status of the proposal to move the National College of Art and Design from its existing location to a site on the University College Dublin campus; her views on the strong opposition from students and staff; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23807/06]
I understand that An Bord of NCAD recently decided that it wishes to remain at the Thomas Street campus. My Department, in association with the Higher Education Authority (HEA), is willing to consider the implications of this decision in the context of the original campus development plan or any amendment of it that the College Authorities decide to put forward.
448 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of primary schools in the Dublin 24 area which have classes of 20 or more children under nine years of age; if same is in line with a commitment given by the Government that there would be no class of over 20 students for under nines; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23293/06]
The information requested by the Deputy is not readily available in my Department. If the Deputy would like information on a particular school or schools, my officials would be happy to provide it.
Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.
Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education.
Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.
It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year. Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.
This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.
449 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Education and Science the steps which have been taken to redevelop schools (details supplied) in Dublin 7; when the redevelopment is expected to begin and be completed; the locations where the pupils will be housed in the interim; the expected cost of the temporary accommodation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23301/06]
I am pleased to inform the Deputy that my Department issued a tender approval letter in March 2006 for the proposed project at the school in question. The project consists of the following: (1) The restoration & refurbishment of the original 19th century school building at St. Peter's National School, which is a protected structure; (2) The demolition of buildings to the rear of the retained building; (3) The construction of eight new classrooms, a special needs room, library, general purpose room and associated stores and toilets. The construction will also include a larger playground, retaining and boundary walls.
A two storey temporary school building, located within the grounds of St. Peter's Church, Dalymount Road, Phibsboro and accessible from the North Circular Road has been provided for the pupils during the construction phase. The provision of the temporary accommodation is included as part of the overall contract for the project.
Contracts have been signed and the Main Contractor has recently commenced works. The estimated project completion date is September/ October 2007.
450 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of special language units here; the waiting list for each unit; and the number of hours that children in each unit receive in speech therapy on a weekly basis. [23328/06]
I can confirm that there are approximately 63 special classes for children with specific speech and language disorder in primary schools nationwide. The classes operate at a pupil teacher ratio of 7:1. Responsibility for enrolment to these classes rests with the individual school authority and my Department would not hold any information in relation to waiting lists for these classes.
As the Deputy will be aware, the provision of therapy services is a matter for the Health Services Executive (HSE) and funding is provided to the HSE for such purposes. The extent of service provided to these classes is a matter for the HSE and this information is not available in my Department.
451 Mr. Noonan asked the Minister for Education and Science if the site proposed for accommodating a new Gaelcholáiste and Gaelscoil (details supplied) in County Limerick has been assessed by her Department; if the assessment has proved satisfactory; the steps she is taking to provide permanent accommodation for the Gaelscoil; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23335/06]
479 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science if issues relating to the proposed site for a school (details supplied) in County Limerick have been clarified; if the site can be acquired; the expected timeframe in this regard; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23658/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 451 and 479 together.
The Property Management Section of the Office of Public Works which acts on behalf of my Department in relation to site acquisitions generally has been requested to source a site for the gaelscoil in question.
While a suitable parcel of land has been identified, an map of the specific area offered for sale is awaited from the vendor. This map is required in order to clarify specific suitability issues such as access, connections to services etc.
As soon as OPW receive this map, these more detailed issues can be examined. On completion of the site acquisition, the project will be considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006-2010.
452 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science if a person (details supplied) in County Dublin is eligible for a home tuition grant or other assistance from her Department to pay for the cost of home tuition as they missed over 20 days of school this year, due to illness. [23336/06]
My officials will forward an application form for home tuition to the family referred to by the Deputy. When this is returned to my Department it will be considered and a decision will be conveyed to the family subsequently.
453 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason for her Department’s decision to allocate differing pupil teacher ratios to boys, mixed and girls schools and disadvantaged schools in relation to the deployment of special educational resources in view of special education circular SP ED 02/05 of August 2005; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23337/06]
454 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science the way in which her Department calculates the deployment of special educational resources pupil teacher ratios for primary schools who have mixed classes up to first class and then become a solely girls school, given that differing pupil teacher ratios apply in view of special education circular SP ED 02/05 of August 2005. [23338/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 453 and 454 together.
In light of the reality that pupils in the high-incidence disability categories of mild and borderline mild general learning disability and dyslexia are distributed throughout the education system, my Department, in consultation with educational interests, developed a general model of learning support/resource teacher allocation to schools to support students in these disability categories.
The model was constructed so that allocations would be based on pupil numbers, taking into account the differing needs of the most disadvantaged schools and the evidence that boys have greater difficulties than girls in this regard. The logic behind having a general allocation model is to reduce the need for individual applications and supporting psychological assessments, and put resources in place on a more systematic basis, thereby giving schools more certainty about their resource levels. This will allow for better planning in schools, greater flexibility in identifying and intervening earlier with regard to pupils' special needs, as well as making the posts more attractive to qualified teachers.
The advantages of using a general allocation model are as follows: It facilitates early intervention as the resource is in place in the school when the child enrols; it reduces the need for individual applications and supporting psychological assessments; it puts resources in place on a more systematic basis, thereby giving schools more certainty about their resource levels. it gives more security to special education teaching posts and makes special education teaching a more attractive option; it allows flexibility to school management in the deployment of resources, leading to a more effective and efficient delivery of services; it will automatically adjust a school's general allocation on the basis of changing enrolment.
This is a model for resource allocation to schools. These resources may in turn be allocated, as appropriate by schools to those pupils with special educational needs in the categories mentioned and to pupils with learning support requirements.
Staffing levels under the general allocation model are allocated on the basis of the following categories of school: Larger schools: Differing pupil teacher ratios apply to boys' mixed and girls' schools; schools for boys with 135 pupils or more get their first post at 135; second post at 295; third post at 475, fourth post at 655, and so on. Mixed schools with 145 pupils or more get their first post at 145; second post at 315; third post at 495; fourth post at 675, and so on. Schools for girls' with 195 pupils or more get their first post at 195; second post at 395; third post at 595; fourth post at 795, and so on. All designated disadvantaged schools get their first post at 80; second post at 160; third post at 240; fourth post at 320, and so on.
It should be noted that schools qualify for a pro rata part of a post for pupil numbers below the enrolment point for the first post and between the first and second post, the second and third post, and so on. Small schools: To ensure that small schools are not disadvantaged by the introduction of the general allocation model, the point at which smaller schools can appoint their first post is significantly reduced. For the purposes of the general allocation model, a boys' school is considered to be small if it has an enrolment of fewer than 135 pupils, a mixed school is considered to be small if it has an enrolment of fewer than 145 pupils, and a girls' school is considered to be small if it has an enrolment of fewer than 195 pupils.
Small schools for boys will qualify for their first post at 100 pupils; small mixed schools will qualify for their first post at 105 pupils; and small schools for girls will qualify for their first post at 150 pupils. However, no additional general allocation will be made to small schools for boys on the basis of an enrolment between 100 and 135, to small mixed schools on the basis of an enrolment between 105 and 145, or to small schools for girls for an enrolment between 150 and 195.
For the purposes of this model, my Department categorises schools that had an enrolment of at least 30 percent boys in the 2003/2004 school year as a mixed school with the allocations in accordance with the ratios for mixed schools above, otherwise the ratios for girls' schools is used. The ratio for schools designated as disadvantaged for the general allocation is 80:1 irrespective of the gender breakdown of the enrolment.
Additional resource teacher support to schools in respect of pupils with low-incidence special educational needs are made on the basis of applications, supported by certain professional assessments and recommendations, to special educational needs organisers, officials of the National Council for Special Education.
455 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the provision of a new school at Listellick, Tralee, County Kerry; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23341/06]
An application for capital funding towards the provision of a new school on a greenfield site has been received from the school authority of Listellick National School. The application has been assessed and the long-term projected staffing figure on which accommodation needs will be based has been determined.
The Office of Public Works which acts on my behalf of my Department in relation to site acquisitions has been requested to investigate the acquisition of a suitable site. Once site acquisition is finalised the building project required to deliver on the school's accommodation needs will be considered for progression in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006-10.
456 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science further to her refusal to provide data in respect of retention rates for second level schools on an area basis, if she will make these figures available for the education co-ordinators of the area partnerships in order to facilitate their work in respect of education disadvantage; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23367/06]
In my opinion, it is desirable that parents and the public in general have information about schools that is meaningful, fair and fully rounded. Data on school retention in respect of individual schools or local areas are not provided by my Department as these could be used to create statistical comparisons that take account of only one dimension of school performance and outcomes and do not adjust for the varying social and educational background of students entering these schools as well as the range of learning outcomes not captured in measures of examination performance or school completion. In the absence of a broader range of outcomes such comparisons could therefore impact in a negative way on schools in disadvantaged areas.
It is my policy to facilitate the provision of the broadest and most meaningful information based on school performance through the progressive publication of school inspection reports at primary and post-primary level. My Department provides the funding for the education co-ordinators in Pobal who work with Area Partnerships throughout the country. They concentrate on target groups in need of alternative or supplementary educational supports and interact with RAPID co-ordinators to help bring a more integrated and co-ordinated approach to educational services for young people at risk of educational disadvantage. The Department will continue to work with the Area Partnerships to achieve the best possible educational outcomes for the communities they serve.
457 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science if, in view of the difficulties which have arisen in a school (details supplied) in Dublin 9 due to the recent rushed and ill-thought out amalgamation, and in further view of the negative impact which the difficulties are having on students and staff, she will accede to the request for additional interim resources; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23368/06]
Teacher allocations to second level schools are approved annually by my Department in accordance with established rules based on recognised pupil enrolment. Each school management authority is required to organise its teaching time-table and subject options having regard to pupils needs within the limit of its approved teacher allocation. The rules for allocating teaching resources provide that where a school management authority is unable to meet its curricular commitments, my Department will consider applications for additional short term support. An independent appeals mechanism is available to school authorities who wish to appeal the adequacy of their teacher allocation.
The school in question applied for curricular concessions amounting to 6.6 whole time equivalent posts for the 2006/07 school year. My Department granted 6.33 whole time equivalent teaching posts and advised the school that, in the event of its not being satisfied with this allocation, it could appeal to the independent Appeals Committee. The school subsequently appealed this decision. However, the Appeals Committee decided that no further teaching allocation was warranted for the 2006/07 school year. The decision of the Appeals Committee is final. The total teaching staff allocation to the school for the 2006/07 school year is 65.14 wholetime equivalent teacher posts including an allocation of 5.84 wholetime equivalent teacher posts to cater for its pupils with special educational needs. Based on an enrolment of 781 pupils, this level of allocation leaves the school with an actual pupil teacher ratio of 11.98:1.
458 Mr. Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will make a statement regarding the higher education grants system of assessment which is in operation since 1983. [23377/06]
The assessment of means under my Department's Third Level Student Maintenance Grant Schemes is based on gross income from all sources, with specified social welfare and health board payments being excluded from the calculation.
Under the schemes reckonable income is defined as income from: Employment/Pensions; Self Employment/Farming; Rent and income from Land/Property; Deposit/Investment Accounts; Maintenance Arrangements; Gifts/Inheritances and Disposal of Assets and Rights; Social Welfare in certain circumstances.
I have no plans at present to depart from the above practice in respect of the determination of income.
459 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Education and Science if her attention has been drawn to the circumstances outlined in correspondence (details supplied) and the detailed reports already submitted to her Department officials; if she will intervene on this case and appoint an external adjudicator in view of the circumstances; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23410/06]
My Department has received correspondence in relation to this case. However, it is considered that the complaint is one which can be adequately addressed through the internal processes of the University itself.
460 Mr. Blaney asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will give her support and approval to a committee (details supplied) in County Donegal in their endeavours to establish a gaelscoil; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23413/06]
It is my Department's policy to support the provision of all-Irish school facilities at primary and post-primary level in all areas where a demand for such provision is clearly demonstrated and no alternative exists within a reasonable distance. An application has been received from the founding committee to establish a Gaelcholáiste in the area referred to and is under active consideration in my Department.
461 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Education and Science her views on whether Ireland has the second highest primary school class size in the EU; her proposals to deal with same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23422/06]
The most recent comparative figures which are available relate to the 2003/2004 year and indicate that this was the case at that time. However, the Deputy will be aware that major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4,000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.
Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.
Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.
It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.
Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.
This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.
462 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will ensure that a place is available in the autism unit for a student (details supplied) in County Cork. [23430/06]
I wish to advise the Deputy that the enrolment of a pupil in a primary school is a matter for the school's Board of Management. I can confirm that the local special educational needs organiser is liaising with the school authorities in relation to an application to have the child enrolled in the school in question.
463 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Education and Science the action she will take in the case of person (details supplied) in County Galway who has been a special needs assistant for a number of years under the FÁS community employment scheme. [23431/06]
The recruitment, employment and dismissal of individual Special Need Assistants (SNAs) are matters for each school authority.
My Department understands from the Board of Management of the school referred to by the Deputy, that the Special Need Assistant in question has been employed under a FÁS Community Employment Scheme. The SNA is not on my Department's payroll and any issues in relation to his contract of employment is a matter for the school authority and FÁS/Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
464 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science if an application will be approved with her primary building unit for a school (details supplied) in County Roscommon; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23449/06]
An application for capital funding towards the provision of an extension project has been received from the school to which the Deputy refers. My Department has recently sought clarification from the school authorities in relation to aspects of the proposal. Upon receipt of same, further consideration will be given to the application.
465 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 317 of 15 December 2005, her plans to introduce physical education as an examination subject at leaving certificate level; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23451/06]
In accordance with the Rules and Programme for Secondary Schools, all second level schools should offer Physical Education as part of the curriculum. The programme should be based on the Department's approved syllabuses and teaching hours should be registered on the school timetable. The syllabuses in Physical Education have been developed on the basis of a time allocation of two hours per week.
The phasing in of a revised Physical Education syllabus (non-examination) at Junior Cycle level commenced in September 2003. The Junior Cycle Physical Education Support Service has been in place since then to support teachers in the implementation of this syllabus. It is not possible at this time to set a timescale for the introduction of Physical Education as an examination subject.
466 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 219 of 1 June 2006 and your letter, when the funding will be available so that work can commence on this vital life saving project; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23465/06]
I am pleased to inform the Deputy that the advertisement seeking design team consultants for the proposed development project at the school in question was published on the public procurement portal, www.etenders.gov.ie, on Friday 16 June.
The closing date for receipt of expressions of interest from consultants is Wednesday 9 August and the selection process will be carried out by the Client, the Vocational Education Committee. Architectural planning of the project will begin immediately after the design team is formally appointed. Progression of this project to tender and construction will be considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006-2010.
467 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will make a personal intervention in the ongoing impasse regarding the collection of students (details supplied) from Latton village in the interest of fair play and above all safety; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23466/06]
The pupils from the Latton area may apply for catchment boundary transport to the college referred to in the details supplied by the Deputy subject to the terms of the Post-Primary School Transport Scheme. My Department has requested Bus Éireann to comment on the safety issues raised by the Deputy.
468 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the amount of funding that has been spent on the provision of prefab buildings in each county per year between 1995 and 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23469/06]
I am providing the Deputy with the total expenditure incurred by my Department on both the purchase and rental of temporary accommodation for primary and post primary schools nationally since 1998. It is not possible to readily provide this information for years prior to 1998; or to provide the information in the format that the Deputy has requested.
Nationally, between 1998 and the end of 2005, a total of €88.997m has been expended on the purchase of temporary accommodation for primary and post primary schools. This expenditure was for the supply and installation of prefabricated buildings including associated site works, and other costs such as for compliance with planning permission conditions, professional fees, connections for water, electricity and sewage. This represents less than 5% of the total expenditure on school buildings (€2.101billion) between 2000 and 2005. In the period since 1998 to the end of 2005, my Department spent €58.55 million on renting temporary accommodation for primary and post primary schools. This represents less than 3% of the total expenditure on school buildings between 2000 and 2005.
The demand for additional accommodation in schools has risen significantly over the last number of years mainly due to the rapid expansion in teacher numbers particularly in the area of special needs, the growth in the school-going population in rapidly developing areas and the demands to cater for diversity through the recognition of new Gaelscoileanna and Educate Together schools. The current focus within my Department is to empower schools to resolve their accommodation needs, wherever possible, by way of permanent accommodation. In order to reduce the amount of temporary accommodation at primary level a new initiative was launched in 2003. The purpose of this initiative is to allow primary schools to undertake a permanent solution to their classroom accommodation needs and to achieve the best value for money.
My Department has also used other innovative solutions to deliver urgently required permanent accommodation for schools in rapidly developing areas. An example of this is the new 16 classroom primary school for Griffeen Valley Educate Together National School in Lucan which was delivered through the use of a design and build contract within 13 months.
469 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the action she has taken or will take to give effect to the recommendation of the Evaluation of Educational Provision for Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders as published by the inspectorate of her Department in June 2006, which states that children with ASDs in all educational placements should have access to an adequate, systematic, and coordinated multi-disciplinary support structure; if her actions deriving from the publication of this report will include specific provision for secondary school children who are now enrolled in second level schools and whom it is expected will transfer from primary to secondary school education in the next year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23531/06]
483 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Education and Science if there has been a recent review of her Department’s policies in relation to early intervention for children on the autistic spectrum; if she has satisfied herself that the scope and phasing of intervention provided by her Department is up to international best practice; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23698/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 469 and 483 together.
My Department's Inspectorate carried out an Evaluation of Educational Provision for Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD) which has recently been published and can also be accessed through my Department's website.
This inspectorate report describes an evaluation of the education that is provided for children with ASD in a variety of settings nationwide. The elements of good practice identified during the evaluation process and in the literature review form the basis for the report's recommendations which will make a positive contribution to policy development and to the continuing improvement in the quality of education that is available to children with ASD. The Deputy will be aware of my commitment to ensuring that all children, including those with autism receive an education appropriate to their needs and in this regard my Department currently provides the following facilities for the education of children with autism: approximately 162 Special Classes for children with autism, attached to special and mainstream schools; 15 pre-school classes; 5 Special classes for children with Asperger's Syndrome; 12 Stand-Alone facilities providing an Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA) specific methodology. The NCSE co-ordinates with the health services, schools and other relevant bodies regarding the provision of education and related support services to children with disabilities/ special needs.
My Department supports the education of individual students with autism in various second level schools throughout the country. The precise model of provision made available at second level will depend on the assessed needs of the pupils involved. Some pupils are capable of attending ordinary classes on an integrated basis with additional teacher and/or special needs assistant support. In other cases, placement in special dedicated classes or units attached to the school may be the more appropriate response. Such special classes operate at significantly reduced pupil teacher ratios. In general where a special class for pupils with autism is established by my Department though the number in attendance can vary as pupils attached to these special classes may be facilitated in attending ordinary subject classes on an integrated basis wherever possible.
In addition, my Department's Teacher Education Section has developed a strategy designed to meet the continuing professional development needs of personnel working with children with special educational needs. This involves a major expansion of the range of post-graduate professional training programmes available to teachers in the special needs area and the ongoing development of the Special Education Support Service (SESS) to support schools staff locally. My Department continues to develop and co-ordinate services between the SENO, the HSE and the National Educational Psychological Services (NEPS) in relation to multi-disciplinary support teams for children with autism.
My Department will continue to ensure that the necessary resources are made available for the education of children with special needs. I am confident that the advent of the NCSE will prove of major benefit in ensuring that all children with special educational needs receive the support they require, when and where they require it.
470 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath who has downs syndrome and is in full time education has not been afforded a full time special needs assistant assigned specifically to them; if in this context her Department will take steps to ensure that what was promised in correspondence of 22 December 2005 is afforded to this person; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23543/06]
My Department provides a range of supports to second level schools to enable them to cater for students with special educational needs, including pupils with Downs Syndrome. The supports in question include remedial and additional teaching support, special needs assistant support and funding for the purchase of specialised equipment.
With effect from 1 January 2005, the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) has taken over key functions from the Department of Education and Science in relation to special educational provision. The NCSE was formally established as an independent statutory body on the 1st October 2005 under the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2005. The Council acts under the broad policy direction of the Department of Education and Science but has the resources and the remit to play the leading role in the delivery of education services to children with disabilities/ special needs.
The NCSE co-ordinates with the health services, schools and other relevant bodies regarding the provision of education and related support services to children with disabilities/special needs. The responsibilities of the NCSE include the following: Deciding on applications for additional teaching support in respect of children with disabilities with special educational needs at second level; Deciding on applications for special needs assistant (SNA) hours; Processing applications for school placement in respect of children with disabilities with special education needs.
The precise model of provision made available at second level will depend on the assessed needs of the pupils involved. Some pupils are capable of attending ordinary classes on an integrated basis with additional teacher and/or special needs assistant support. In other cases, placement in special dedicated classes or units attached to the school may be the more appropriate response. Such special classes operate at significantly reduced pupil teacher ratios. Students attached to these special classes may be facilitated in attending ordinary subject classes on an integrated basis wherever possible.
The NCSE, through the local Special Educational Needs Organiser (SENO) will process the relevant application for resources and inform the school of the outcome. It is important to note that in the case of decisions on additional teaching and SNA support, the SENO will outline the process to the school and parents, where appropriate, and will at the end of the process outline the basis on which the decision was made.
In the case of the school in question, 73.48 hours additional teaching support per week and 82 hours special needs assistant support per week have been allocated for the 2005/06 school year to cater for the special educational needs of its pupils, including the pupil to whom the Deputy refers. The NCSE has also confirmed that the school's resources for special educational needs will shortly be reviewed for the 2006/07 school year. The school will be notified directly by the SENO when the review has been finalised. My Department will continue to ensure that the necessary resources are made available for the education of children with special needs. I am confident that the advent of the NCSE will prove of major benefit in ensuring that all children with special educational needs receive the support they require, when and where they require it.
471 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Education and Science her Department’s proposals in relation to a recent survey carried out by way of independent study for her Department as to the provision of secondary school facilities for the Kinnegad area of County Westmeath, as it is an increasing area of population; if it is proposed that a secondary school would be put in place by 2011 based on population projections for this area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23544/06]
As the Deputy will be aware, the local area development plan for the N4/M4 corridor outlines my Department's long-term educational strategy at both primary and post-primary level for the area concerned. The recommendations in the plan are being considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme from 2006 onwards subject to the prioritisation criteria for large scale building projects.
472 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the level of grant aid payable per student which will apply in the case of primary schools operating a book loan or rental scheme in 2006 and 2007; the level of seed capital to second level schools operating such a scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23554/06]
My Department has urged school authorities to put in place book rental schemes, at both primary and post-primary level, to the greatest extent possible. To that end the School Books Grant Scheme may be used by school authorities for the support of book loan/rental schemes. In respect of the 2005/2006 school year, primary schools operating book rental schemes were paid €23.20 in respect of each eligible pupil in the infant classes and €31.20 for each eligible pupil in the 1st to 6th classes.
In respect of the 2006/2007 school year, primary schools operating book rental schemes have been paid €28.40 in respect of each eligible pupil in the infant classes and €38.10 for each eligible pupil in the 1st to 6th classes. In respect of the 2005/2006 school year primary schools designated as disadvantaged that operated book rental schemes were paid €26.20 in respect of each eligible pupil in the infant classes and €36.20 for each eligible pupil in the 1st to 6th classes. In the 2006/2007 school year primary schools designated as disadvantaged that operated book rental schemes have been paid €32.00 in respect of each eligible pupil in the infant classes and €44.30 for each eligible pupil in the 1st to 6th classes.
An additional €0.5m has been made available under the School Books Grant Scheme in respect of the 2006/2007 school year to primary schools in the School Support Programme under DEIS. Schools participating in the SSP that indicate that they will operate a book/loan rental scheme in 2006/2007 will, in the case of primary schools, receive grant aid at a higher rate per eligible pupil than will apply in the case of schools generally and will, in the case of targeted second level schools, receive a seed capital allocation. The extra funding will be aimed at supporting the establishment, development and ongoing operation of book loan/rental schemes.
The Seed Capital Grant for second-level schools is based on the number of needy pupils in the previous academic year as submitted to my Department under the School Books Grant Scheme. The returns for the 2005/2006 academic year are currently being processed and the rate for 2006 will be finalised shortly.
473 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Education and Science if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare whose spouse is the holder of a work permit to work here is eligible to apply for a third level grant; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23559/06]
Under the terms of the Higher Education Grants scheme grant assistance is awarded to students who meet the prescribed conditions of funding including those which relate to nationality, residency, means and previous academic attainment. The Nationality requirement as set out in Clause 4.5 of the Vocational Education Committee Grant Scheme 2005 states that candidates must: hold E.U. Nationality; or have Official Refugee Status; or have been granted Humanitarian Leave to Remain in the State; or have permission to remain in the State by virtue of marriage to an Irish national residing in the State or be the child of such person, not having EU nationality; or have permission to remain in the State by virtue of marriage to a national of another EU Member State who is residing in the State and who is or has been employed, or self-employed, in the State, or be the child of such a person, not having EU nationality; or be nationals of a member country of the European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland. As the candidate referred to by the Deputy does not satisfy the nationality requirement I regret that she is ineligible for grant assistance under the grant Scheme.
There are no plans at present to extend the nationality clause of the student support schemes. Any extension to the scope of the maintenance grants scheme, can be considered only in the light of available resources and in the context of competing demands within the education sector.
474 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will review the situation of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 12; if this person is entitled to funding while undertaking studies to obtain a higher diploma in education; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23560/06]
Under the terms of the Third Level Maintenance Grant Schemes (which are administered under the aegis of the Department, by the Local Authorities and the Vocational Education Committees) the position is that generally speaking, students who are entering approved courses for the first time are eligible for grants where they satisfy the relevant conditions as to residence, means, and nationality and previous academic attainment. An approved course for the purpose of the Schemes means a full-time undergraduate course of not less than two years duration and a full time postgraduate course of not less than one years duration pursued in an approved institution.
The decision on eligibility for third level grants is a matter for the relevant local authority or VEC. These bodies do not refer individual applications to my Department except, in exceptional cases, where, for example, advice or instruction regarding a particular clause in the relevant scheme is desired. It appears that no such advice or instruction has, to date, been sought in the case of the student, referred to by the Deputy. The student referred to by the Deputy should request the grant application form from their local authority with a view to being assessed for grant assistance for the Higher Diploma Course.
475 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science when she intends to commence the transfer of civil servants to Mullingar, County Westmeath under the decentralisation programme; the initial numbers involved; if her Department has sourced temporary accommodation in the town; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23581/06]
The Office of Public Works placed a notification on the eTenders Public Procurement website seeking Expressions of Interest for the design, build, financing and maintenance of office buildings in three of the locations included in the decentralisation programme, including Mullingar on 1 June 2006. The call for expressions of interest is a preliminary stage in a process that will eventually lead to the placing of contracts for the design and construction of accommodation for the 300 posts in my Department to decentralise from Dublin to Mullingar.
The OPW has previously indicated to my Department a target date of Quarter 1 2009 for the completion of the construction of the accommodation for Mullingar. This timetable is contingent on a successful outcome to the tender competition which will follow on the call for expressions of interest, on planning permission being obtained and on no delays being experienced during the architectural planning and construction stages. While there has been some examination of the feasibility of relocating a number of the posts scheduled to decentralise to temporary accommodation in Mullingar in advance of the main move, no decision has been taken on this matter to date.
476 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science the cost of registering to repeat the leaving certificate in 2004 and 2005; her views on a waiver scheme for those for whom the cost of repeating causes financial difficulty; the reason it is significantly more expensive to repeat the exam than to take it for the first time; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23590/06]
The examination fee for school-based repeat Leaving Certificate candidates was €225 in 2004 and €236 in 2005. Special fees for repeat candidates were introduced in 1987 on the basis that it is not unreasonable to expect those who have already benefitted from the normal course of second level education, and who wish to take an extra year, to make a contribution towards the cost of providing the necessary resources. A course fee is also payable in respect of such candidates.
Generally, examination fees cover only a fraction of the cost of running the examinations, and these costs have been spiralling in recent years as new methods of assessment are introduced in various subjects. There is an alleviation scheme in place whereby current medical card holders and their dependents are exempt from the payment of fees. This exemption applies to approximately 30% of all examination candidates each year. This alleviation scheme also applies in the case of repeat candidates in respect of both the course fee and the repeat examination fee.
477 Mr. Healy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the transfer of an organisation (details supplied) in County Tipperary; the position regarding the expressions of interest by property developers; the timescale for the evaluation of the expressions of interest; the timescale for the appointment of a developer, commencement of the building work and transfer of the Institute; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23591/06]
The Report of the Capital Review and Prioritisation Working Group under the Higher Education Authority (HEA) sets out a strategy to meet the future capital needs of the third level sector. In its submission to the Review Group, Tipperary Rural & Business Development Institute (TRBDI) included a proposal to develop a permanent campus in the planned Clonmel Technology Park (Ballingarrane Estate). The Report of the Review Group stated that the proposal, which involves the disposal of an existing property in Clonmel and the building of alternative facilities without incurring any Exchequer funding, has merit.
In March 2005, my Department gave TRBDI approval to proceed with seeking expressions of interest from private sector property developers to determine what could be provided at Ballingarrane in exchange for the Institute's current property in Clonmel. The request for expressions of interest was advertised publicly in June 2005. An evaluation committee, set up by TRBDI to evaluate the expressions of interest, met on the 2nd June 2006. The evaluation committee reviewed the expressions of interest and a shortlist of candidates was drawn up. The Institute will now enter into more detailed discussions with each of the shortlisted candidates with the objective of identifying a preferred bidder.
These discussions with the shortlisted candidates will represent a crucially important phase in this evolving process. Accordingly, it is not possible to specify the likely duration of these discussions. If successfully concluded, and a preferred bidder is selected, it is to be expected that still further and more specific discussions are likely to follow with the preferred bidder. It is at these discussions that significant points of detail including matters such as the appointment of a contractor, duration on site and associated issues shall be firmly resolved such that they can be incorporated into binding legal agreements.
478 Mr. Healy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the amalgamation of schools (details supplied) in County Tipperary; when she proposes to approve the amalgamation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23592/06]
With regard to the proposed amalgamation of the two schools to which the deputy refers, my department has requested the local inspector to provide long term projections for both the boy's and girl's schools to establish the extent of accommodation which will be needed to facilitate the amalgamation. In addition, a technical inspection has been carried out on the existing buildings to determine which, if either, would be suitable to act as a host for the new school. My Department has informed the schools of the outcome this technical inspection.
In the meantime, the project has been assessed in accordance with the agreed prioritisation criteria for large scale projects and it has been assigned a band 1.4 rating (i.e. rationalisation). It will be considered for commencement of architectural planning when the various strands have been pulled together in terms of the long term projected enrolment and a proposed accommodation solution with the objective of identifying a preferred bidder.
These discussions with the shortlisted candidates will represent a crucially important phase in this evolving process. Accordingly, it is not possible to specify the likely duration of these discussions. If successfully concluded, and a preferred bidder is selected, it is to be expected that still further and more specific discussions are likely to follow with the preferred bidder. It is at these discussions that significant points of detail including matters such as the appointment of a contractor, duration on site and associated issues shall be firmly resolved such that they can be incorporated into binding legal agreements.
480 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science if a decision has been made in relation to an application for temporary classroom accommodation at a school (details supplied) in County Tipperary for the school year 2006 to 2007, while awaiting commencement of works on permanent accommodation approved by her Department. [23686/06]
I am pleased to inform the Deputy that the school referred to has been granted initial approval for the rental of temporary classroom accommodation for the school year 2006 to 2007. The initial letter of approval was issued to the school authorities on the 6th of June 2006 and the school must now return the form of acceptance included in that letter. The final approval for rental of temporary accommodation will be considered when all relevant details are furnished by the school.
481 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science when a sports hall will be provided at a school (details supplied) in County Mayo; when she expects work to commence; if same will be in place for the 2007 school year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23690/06]
The provision of PE Halls at post-primary level is considered an integral part of the design stage for any major refurbishment programme of existing school buildings. All applications received in the Department are banded in accordance with the prioritisation criteria put in place following consultation with the Education partners. The PE Hall project at the school referred to by the Deputy has been assessed in accordance with the published prioritisation criteria, and the project is being considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006-2010.
482 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science if her attention has been drawn to the difficulties being experienced by teaching staff at a school (details supplied) in County Mayo; her views on whether the dimensions of the staff room are adequate in the context of health and safety regulations; her proposals to improve this situation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23691/06]
My Department are currently examining an application for additional accommodation submitted by the school authorities. However no mention of the inadequate dimensions of the staff room are made in the application.
My Department would be happy to examine any submission from the school in relation to the need for extra facilities for staff accommodation in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006 -2010.
484 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for Education and Science her proposals and the timeframe for the provision of a permanent school building for a school (details supplied) in County Meath; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23723/06]
The school to which the Deputy refers opened, with provisional recognition from my Department, in September 2005.
During the period of provisional recognition, it is the responsibility of the school patron to provide interim accommodation. This accommodation must be capable of fully meeting the needs of the developing school until permanent recognition has been secured and my Department is in a position to acquire a site and provide a permanent school building.
However, in this particular case, the Patron has indicated that it is his intention to provide the site for the permanent school building. When the site has been acquired, progress on the building project will be considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme from 2006 onwards.
485 Mr. Andrews asked the Minister for Education and Science the stage the building project for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin has achieved; and the timetable for completion of same. [23745/06]
The project referred to by the Deputy is one of 122 projects I announced last year for proceeding to tender and construction over a 12 to 15 month period.
Issues in relation to the site for this new 16 classroom school have recently been finalised and this now enables work to be done on the detailed design for the lodgement of planning permission. My Department is using a generic repeat design for this project to facilitate the early lodgement of planning permission and progression to tender and construction as soon as possible.
486 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Education and Science the breakdown of primary school class sizes in County Clare showing in each case the number of pupils in classes of 19 and under; 20 to 29, 30 to 39 and 40 plus; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23799/06]
The most recent information on class sizes for County Clare is for the 2005/2006 school year and is as follows:
Classes of 19 and under — 1,890 pupils:
Classes of 20 to 29 — 6,746 pupils:
Classes of 30 to 39 — 3,116 pupils:
Classes of 40 plus — 41 pupils.
As the Deputy will be aware, major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.
Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. Indeed, with the thousands of extra primary teachers hired by this Government, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule.
As you know all schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher. So, as I have pointed out the general rule in the current school year is that at least one classroom teacher is provided for every 29 pupils. Furthermore, the actual average class size nationally is 24.
It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.
Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.
Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, I often find that when I look into why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade, the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.
I appreciate that splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, I believe that principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.
This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.
487 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Education and Science if her Department has received a comprehensive submission from the board of management of a school (details supplied) in County Westmeath seeking a new school which is required to accommodate the significant increase of school going children in the general area and which is projected to increase by 350 per cent; if she will give approval for the construction of a new school without delay; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23800/06]
The School Planning Section of my Department has received an application from the school to which the Deputy refers for a new school building. The application is currently being assessed. A decision in the matter will issue to the school authority as quickly as possible.
488 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will report on the position regarding a site for a school (details supplied) in Dublin in view of the fact that three suitable sites have been identified by the school following consultation with Fingal County Council; if her officials will sanction one of them and allow the process to proceed. [23810/06]
The school referred to by the Deputy was granted provisional recognition earlier this year. This recognition is contingent on the proposed accommodation meeting the criteria as set out in the Department's guidelines under the Criteria for the Recognition of New Schools. These criteria state that "In accordance with Section 10 (2) (e) of the Education Act 1998, the proposed interim accommodation complies with the Local Government (Planning and Development) Acts 1963 to 1996, the Building Regulations 1991 to 1997 (including the Building Control Regulations), the Health, Safety and Welfare Act, 1989 and any modifications, statutory instruments or orders made in accordance with these Acts."
School Planning Section of my Department is of the view that the school has not, as yet met the accommodation criteria and this view has been communicated to the Patron of the school.
There are three sites reserved for Primary schools in the Balbriggan area. One of these sites has been earmarked as the permanent location for Balbriggan Educate Together N.S. Ownership of this site is currently being transferred to my Department through Fingal County Council. Neither of the two other reserved school sites is in the ownership of Fingal County Council or my Department at present and no proposal has been received from the promoters of the new school regarding any of these sites.
489 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science her views on the Blackstock Report; if she intends to implement its recommendations; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23811/06]
491 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science her plans to address the discrepancy in the level of funding provided to voluntary second level schools and those in the community and comprehensive sector; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23828/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 489 and 491 together.
As the Deputies will be aware, differing funding arrangements have evolved for the different school types at second level. At the core of all arrangements is a reliance upon capitation as the principle determinant of funding. There are however significant differences in the approaches to the funding of back-up services such as for secretaries and caretakers. Following on the Blackstock Report, which reviewed this area including the matter of equity of funding between the different sectors, a range of equalisation measures have been introduced that are designed to reduce the historic anomalies in the funding arrangements.
In addition to the increases in the standard per capita grant that now stands at €298 per pupil from January last, voluntary secondary schools have benefited additionally by the introduction of grants under the School Services Support initiative. The standard support services grant that was increased to €107 per pupil from January 2006, now stands at €159 per pupil since January 2006 in the case of voluntary secondary schools. This equalisation measure of €52 per pupil for voluntary secondary schools, is paid in addition to grants of up to €15,554 per school. Schools are afforded considerable flexibility in the use of these resources to cater for the needs of their pupils.
I am committed to improving further the funding position of second level schools in the light of available resources and to addressing the issue of equity highlighted by the voluntary school sector.
490 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the plans she has to assist schools with rising insurance costs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23812/06]
Insurance costs for schools are entirely a matter for the managerial authorities of individual schools. My Department provides funding to primary and secondary schools by way of per capita grants, which affords schools considerable flexibility in the use of these resources to cater for the needs of their pupils. This is in my view a preferable approach to putting in place grants for specific cost items such as insurance.
There have been significant improvements in the level of funding provided to primary and post-primary schools. Since 1997 the standard rate of capitation grant at primary level has been increased from €57.14 per pupil to €133.58 with effect from 1st January, 2005 and has been further increased by €12 per pupil with effect from 1st January, 2006 bringing the standard rate to €145.58. This represents an increase of almost 155% in the standard rate of capitation grant at primary level since 1997.
At second level, the standard per capita grant, which stood at €256 per pupil in the school year 2001/02, has been increased by a further €12 to €298 per pupil from January, 2006. Under the School Services Support Fund initiative secondary schools will also benefit from further significant increases. The grant that was increased for secondary schools from €131 per pupil to €145 per pupil in January, 2005, has been increased by a further €14 per pupil to €159 per pupil from January, 2006. These grants are in addition to the per capita funding of up to €40,000 per school that is provided by my Department to secondary schools towards secretarial and caretaking services. A secondary school with 500 pupils now receives annual grants of up to €270,000 towards general expenses and support services as against annual grants of up to €237,000 in 2002.
These significant increases in the funding of primary and post primary schools are a clear demonstration of my commitment to prioritise available resources to address the needs of schools.
492 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to parliamentary reply No. 431 of 6 December 2005, if funding will be approved for the project; the status of the application; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23830/06]
As part of the expansion of the devolved scheme for primary school building works, a grant of €820,000 was sanctioned in March 2006 under the Small Schools Scheme to enable the management authority of the school in question to provide a new three classroom school.
The Devolved Initiative allows Boards of Management to address their accommodation and building priorities with a guaranteed amount of funding and gives Boards of Management control of the building project. I understand that the Board of Management have appointed a Consultant to progress the design stage of the project.
493 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Education and Science if there are supports available above and beyond the summer works scheme and minor works grants to facilitate important works to be carried out to a school (details supplied) in County Donegal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23837/06]
An official from my Department has been in contact with the school in question regarding additional works required to the school building. The school management has been advised to submit an application for funding for the works in question and when this is received in my Department, the matter will be given urgent consideration.
494 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Education and Science the status of the introduction of the Youth Work Act 2001; her plans for the roll-out of more of the services for young people in the second half of 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23838/06]
The Youth Work Act, 2001, provides a legal framework for the provision of youth work programmes and services to be organised by the Minister for Education and Science, the Vocational Education Committees and national and regional youth work organisations. Section 1 of the Act provides for sections to be commenced at different stages.
As I advised the Deputy previously, a sub-committee of the National Youth Work Advisory Committee, representative of both statutory and voluntary sectors, has been steadily progressing the groundwork, including the development of detailed guidelines and procedures, which are vital for the further rollout of the Act in a planned and structured manner. To date work has been completed on the following:
1. Criteria for the Approval of National Voluntary Youth Work Organisations
2. Criteria for the Designation of Local Voluntary Youth Work Organisations
3. Guidelines for the Establishment of Voluntary Youth Councils.
Work on other areas including Standing Orders for Local Voluntary Youth Councils, Terms of Reference for Youth Work Committees, and Criteria for The Authorisation of Organisations is nearing completion. The sub-committee is also addressing other provisions of the Act.
It is my intention that the additional €2.839m secured in 2006 for the main funding line for the youth work sector will be used to develop the youth work service in a strategic manner and will include the progressive roll out of the Youth Work Act, 2001. The resourcing of VECs, including the appointment of Youth Work Officers, to carry out the functions set out for them under the Act has been agreed in principle by my Department and the IVEA. My Department is currently finalising the detail involved. This will be a significant step forward which will allow for the development of local youth work plans and ensure co-ordination of youth work programmes and services in the area with education and other programmes for young people.
I identified the capacity development of voluntary youth work organisations to assist them in preparing themselves organisationally for the implementation of the Act as a priority for 2005. To this end I established a Development Fund to help ensure that youth work organisations can achieve the new standards for approval and engage effectively with the new structures arising from the Youth Work Act, 2001. Some 30 national and major regional youth organisations received once-off grants amounting to over €300,000 to help develop their ICT capacity in 2005. I am making similar funding available to national and major voluntary youth work organisations in 2006 and my Department is currently discussing priority areas for development with the various youth work interests.
With regard to the roll-out of more services for young people, my Department is currently identifying priority areas for development and expansion in 2006. It is my intention to announce the allocation of funding to youth organisations and youth projects very shortly. The establishment of a National Youth Work Development Unit in the National University of Ireland in Maynooth will be a key element in the development of youth work. Its functions will include researching and developing guidelines for best practice in youth work and assisting youth organisations to implement same, as well as managing and coordinating research. Another new and important development is the imminent appointment of an Assessor of Youth Work. This post is viewed by all involved in youth work, both in the statutory and voluntary sectors, as an essential step forward.
In addition, I would like to point out that my Department has secured an additional €2m in 2006 from the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs which is responsible for the disbursement of Dormant Accounts (via the Economic and Social Disadvantage Committee). This provision will focus on small capital grants for equipment for local youth clubs and will complement my Department's existing Local Youth Club Grant Scheme.
495 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science if she intends to appoint a student representative to the Grangegorman Development Board or the Docklands Rail Development Authority; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23860/06]
The relocation of DIT, which is currently spread over 30 different sites in Dublin, to a 65-acre campus in Grangegorman is a major priority for this Government. The move will enable the Institute to provide better academic and support services for its nearly 20,000 students. It also has great potential to regenerate an underdeveloped area of the North Inner city.
I recently appointed Mr. John Fitzgerald, City Manager, Dublin City Council as Chairman of the Grangegorman Development Agency and I am now actively considering the other appointments to the Agency. The general aim of the Agency is to oversee the Development of the lands at Grangegorman on behalf of the Departments of Education and Science and Health and Children, the Dublin Institute of Technology and the Health Service Executive.
The Grangegorman Development Agency Act 2005 provides for a total membership of 15 in the agency including the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer. There is no specific provision for a student or staff representative from the DIT.
The legislation does provide that 2 ordinary members of the agency will be nominated by the President of DIT and it is clearly a matter for the President to determine who to nominate having regard to the functions of the agency set out in the Act and its governance role in relation to the development.
The legislation recognises the student body of DIT specifically among the stakeholders that should be represented on the Consultative Group provided for in Section 22 of the Act. Up to 2 members of the Consultative Group can come from the student body.
My officials recently met the President of DIT Students' Union and explained how the Consultative Group will give the stakeholders an opportunity to outline their views and participate fully in the Grangegorman development. The Act also provides for the Consultative Group to hold as many meetings as may be necessary to maintain an adequate communications strategy concerning the development of the Grangegorman site. The Consultative Group reports to the Chairperson of the Agency.
As the Docklands (Rail) Development Authority is not under my remit I am unable to comment regarding appointments to that Authority.
496 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Education and Science the position in relation to the provision of a new primary school at Forgney, County Longford, as same is required in view of the recent projection relating to pupil numbers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23861/06]
497 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Science the timeframe for the provision of a new primary school which is required at Forgney, County Longford; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23862/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 496 and 497 together.
The School Planning Section of my Department has received an application from the school to which the Deputy refers for a new school building. The application is currently being assessed. A decision in the matter will issue to the school authority as quickly as possible.
498 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science the way in which it is expected she or her Department can have an up to date appraisal of the extent of school bullying in the absence of a direct liaison between schools and her Department; if she intends to create a monitoring mechanism; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23874/06]
There is no absence of a direct liaison between schools and my Department.
The evaluation of all school policies, including a policy to deal with bullying behaviour, is part of the Whole School Evaluation process. WSE involves a full examination of all the varied activities of a school — from teaching standards to the availability of extra-curricular activities, the ethos of the school and the implementation of policies in areas such as bullying and health and safety. The inspection process also includes consultation with parents, staff members and students.
I am acutely aware of the issue of bullying in schools and my Department has in place a multi-faceted strategy to tackle the issue. The education of students in both primary and post-primary schools in relation to anti-bullying behaviour is a central part of the SPHE curriculum. SPHE is now a compulsory subject both at primary level and in the junior cycle of post-primary schools. The SPHE curriculum provides for the development of personal and social skills including self-awareness, respect for others, self-esteem and communication skills, all of which are important elements in addressing the issue of bullying. In Primary education, the issue of bullying is addressed in the SPHE curriculum in the Strand "Myself and Others" from Infant classes onwards. In Second-level education, the issue of bullying is addressed from first year onwards in the SPHE Curriculum at Junior Cycle, in the Module on "Belonging and Integrating".
Each school is required to have in place a policy which includes specific measures to deal with bullying behaviour, within the framework of an overall school Code of Behaviour and Discipline. Such a code, properly devised and implemented, can be the most influential measure in countering bullying behaviour in schools. Recently, when I addressed the annual conference of the Irish Primary Principals Network, I asked school principals to ensure that effective policies are in place in their schools and that bullying is not tolerated in any way, shape or form.
My Department, in its "Guidelines on Countering Bullying Behaviour in schools", has provided a national framework within which individual school management authorities may meet their responsibilities for implementing effective school-based policies to counter bullying. These guidelines were drawn up following consultation with representatives of school management, teachers and parents, and are sufficiently flexible to allow each school authority to adapt them to suit the particular needs of the school. My Department will keep these Guidelines under review with a view to updating them where necessary.
In recent years, there have been a number of pilot programmes which have also addressed this issue. Pilot programmes are utilised as a means of informing possible new initiatives or how best existing provision may be improved upon. The function of pilot programmes is to test and evaluate different ideas and approaches in order to aid and enhance existing provision. Pilot programmes, when completed, are evaluated in terms of programme content, effectiveness and appropriateness and the recommendations and findings are considered in the context of developing existing programmes and structures which are designed to meet the needs of schools at local level.
My Department also participates in an OECD "International Network on School Bullying and Violence". Sharing good practice and the most up to date approaches to addressing issues in this area is a key objective of the group.
An effective framework is in place whereby schools are given guidelines and support in how to tackle bullying. I urge all schools to ensure that they have the procedures in place to deal with bullying so that all children can feel safe and happy at school.
499 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science if, further to recent reports, schools in County Kildare have experienced an increase in pupil/teacher ratios in the past five years; the action she proposed to take to address the issue in areas of population growth; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23875/06]
500 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science further to previous parliamentary questions and the replies thereto which indicated an improvement in pupil/teacher ratios, the way in which it has transpired that some schools have actually recorded increased pupil/teacher ratios; the cause or causes of same; if such schools are located in areas of population growth; her plans to address the issue; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23876/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 499 and 500 together.
The information requested by the Deputy is not readily available in my Department. If the Deputy would like information on a particular school or schools, my officials would be happy to provide it.
The mainstream staffing of a primary school is determined by reference to the enrolment of the school on the 30th September of the previous school year and by reference to a staffing schedule. The staffing schedule for the 2006/07 school year is outlined in Primary Circular 23/06 which issued to all primary schools recently.
Within the terms of the current staffing arrangements for primary schools there is provision for additional posts, referred to as developing school posts, to be assigned to schools on the basis of projected enrolments for the next school year. Under these arrangements, a developing school post may be sanctioned provisionally where the projected enrolment at 30th September of the school year in question equals or exceeds a specified figure. If the specified figure is not achieved on 30th September, sanction for the post is withdrawn.
To ensure openness and transparency in the system an independent Appeal Board is now in place to decide on any staffing appeals. The criteria under which an appeal can be made are set out in Department Primary Circular 0024/2006 which is also available on my Department's website.
501 D'fhiafraigh Mr. McGinley den Aire Oideachais agus Eolaíochta cad é an socrú atá déanta idir a Roinn agus an Roinn Gnóthaí Pobail, Tuaithe agus Gaeltachta maidir le cómhaoiniú a dhéanamh ar thógáil halla spóirt ag scoil (sonraí tugtha); agus an ndéanfaidh sí ráiteas ina thaobh. [23908/06]
Tá áthas orm a dheimhniú, ar bhonn ranníoc suntasach áitiúil a bheith á chur ar fáil ag pobal na scoile agus tiomantas ó mo chomhghleacaí an tAire Gnóthaí Pobail, Tuaithe agus Gaeltachta cómhaoiniú a dhéanamh faoin Scéim Feabhsúcháin Gaeltachta, gur cheadaigh mé an tionscadal Halla Corpoideachais a chur tríd an bpróiseas pleanála ailtireachta agus ar aghaidh go tairiscint agus tógáil.
502 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the special educational services available to children with Down’s Syndrome at both primary and secondary school levels; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23935/06]
503 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science if children diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome are precluded from being allocated special needs assistants if they have been enrolled in preschool education from an early age; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23936/06]
504 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children with Down’s Syndrome currently attending primary and secondary schools in the State; if it is the preferred policy of her Department that children with Down’s Syndrome attend mainstream schools or special schools; if within mainstream schools children with Down’s Syndrome are usually accommodated in special classes or in mainstream classes; the number of special classes in mainstream schools which accommodate students with Down’s Syndrome; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [23937/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 502 to 504, inclusive, together.
As the Deputy will be aware, my Department provides a range of teaching and care supports for children with special educational needs, including children with Down Syndrome. The precise level of support is determined by the special educational needs of the particular child.
Children with Down Syndrome are entitled to additional provision in primary school, either under the terms of the general allocation system of teaching supports if the assessment places the child in the high incidence disability category or through an allocation of additional resources if the child is assessed as being within the low incidence category of special need, as defined by my Department's circular.
Children with Down Syndrome who have been enrolled in a pre-school are not precluded from being allocated special needs assistant support (SNA) in the primary and post primary school system. The need for SNA support is determined by the special educational needs organisers in the context of the criteria outlined in my Department's circular.
The position at second level is similar in that my Department provides a range of supports to second level schools to enable them to cater for pupils with special educational needs including pupils with Down Syndrome. The supports in question include learning support and additional teaching support, SNA support and funding for the purchase of specialised equipment.
My Department's policy is to ensure the maximum possible integration of children with special educational needs into ordinary mainstream schools. The precise model of provision made available will depend on the assessed needs of the pupils involved. Some pupils are capable of attending ordinary classes on an integrated basis with additional teacher and/or special needs assistant support. In other cases, placement in special dedicated classes attached to the school may be the more appropriate response. Such special classes operate at significantly reduced pupil teacher ratios. Pupils attached to these special classes at post primary level may be facilitated in attending ordinary subject classes on an integrated basis wherever possible.
Specific data in relation to the number of Down Syndrome pupils attending primary and post-primary schools nationwide is not available in my Department. Similarly, it is not possible to confirm the numbers of those pupils attending mainstream schools who are either integrated into mainstream classes or alternatively enrolled in special classes. As indicated above, the precise model of intervention is based on the assessed needs of the individual child. Pupils assessed as being Down Syndrome do not attend special classes specifically for Down Syndrome pupils. Rather it is the case that, if appropriate, they would enrol in a special class for pupils with an assessed general learning disability (GLD) e.g. a class for pupils with a mild GLD or moderate GLD.
I am satisfied that the mechanisms are in place to provide appropriate resources for children with special needs in our schools, including those with Down Syndrome.
505 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Defence his plans for redevelopment of the St. Bricin’s Hospital site Dublin 7. [23565/06]
I have previously indicated my willingness to make the facilities at St. Bricin's Military Hospital available to the public health service, in the event that the public health service would wish to secure access to these facilities.
Representatives from the Health Service Executive (HSE) and the Department of Health and Children visited St. Bricin's Hospital in 2005 to inspect the facilities. I inspected the hospital facility myself in late April 2005. The Department of Health and Children and the Health Service Executive have given some very detailed consideration to the possible utilisation of the facilities at St. Bricin's for public health purposes. Following this detailed consideration, their view was that St. Bricin's was not suitable for use as an acute or sub-acute facility.
Specialist engineering/architectural surveys carried at St. Bricin's in 2001 indicated that total capital expenditure in the region of at least €20 million (2001 prices) would be required to bring the entire St. Bricin's Hospital facility up to the standard of acute health board and public voluntary hospitals. While some upgrading work has taken place at St. Bricin's since 2001, the building overall, however, remains essentially un-modernised.
The actual expenditure required for full upgrading and modernisation would of course depend on the nature of the intended use of the facility. Any such expenditure would be a matter for the HSE and the Department of Health and Children.
Any future proposals for possible public health care use of the St. Bricin's facilities will be considered positively by me. My Department remains available to do everything possible to co-operate with the Department of Health and Children and the Health Service Executive in that regard should such a consideration arise in the future.
As the Deputy will be aware, the Government agreed on 16 December, 2003 to the release of circa 2.5 acres at St. Bricin's Military Hospital for inclusion in the Sustaining Progress affordable Housing Initiative. The legal formalities in relation to the transfer of the site at St. Bricin's Military Hospital to Dublin City Council are nearing completion.
506 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Defence the reason no FCA or defence training camps are being held in the military barracks, Castlebar as heretofore; his proposals for the development of the barracks there; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23689/06]
Castlebar Military Barracks is primarily a Reserve Defence Force Facility and provides training facilities, office accommodation and storage facilities for Permanent Defence Force Cadre and Unit personnel of Units stationed in the Barracks. I have no plans to change this position.
The accommodation currently available in Castlebar Military Barracks is not of the standard required for the conduct of training camps. There are currently no proposals for the development of these barracks.
507 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the funding available to groups for the provision of a skate board park; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23557/06]
In May 2005, I introduced a new initiative for the provision of skateboard facilities by local authorities. Each City and County Council was invited to submit expressions of interest for grant assistance towards the provision of a skateboard park in its area. Applications were assessed in my Department in conjunction with the National Children's Office and some 21 projects in 21 different local authority areas were recommended for grant aid. A sum of €1 million had initially been earmarked for the scheme in 2005 but, in light of the number and quality of submissions received, I approved all 21 projects in November 2005 and increased the funding allocation to over €2 million which is expected to be spent over a two year period.
Grants for skateboard park facilities are not provided by my Department directly to bodies other than local authorities.
508 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of the 455 decentralised jobs promised to County Wexford in Budget 2003 which have been delivered; if they have not yet been delivered the precise timeframe for delivery of these decentralised jobs to New Ross and Wexford Town; the number of people who have opted for decentralisation to each location; and the number of those who have indicated their willingness to move who are currently working in Dublin. [23763/06]
The present state of progress in relation to the transfer of staff to my Department's new decentralised offices in Wexford and New Ross is set out in the table.
|
Wexford |
New Ross |
|
|
Total posts to be Decentralised |
249 |
125 |
|
Total number of civil servants that have accepted a decentralisation offer from the Department |
132 |
28 |
|
Total number of Dublin-based civil servants that have accepted a decentralisation offer from the Department |
98 |
10 |
It is expected that the Department's Offices in Wexford will be completed in the third quarter of 2008, while the indicative construction date for offices in New Ross is early 2009.
The National Building Agency (55 staff), under the aegis of my Department, is also included in the decentralisation programme and 3 Dublin based staff have applied for decentralisation to the planned Wexford head quarters.
509 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will exempt turbines with a diameter less than 2.5 metres from planning permission under Schedule two of the Planning and Development regulations. [24059/06]
530 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on exempting small wind turbines with rotor diameter less than 2.5 metres from planning permission; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23801/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 509 and 530 together.
I have asked my Department to review the exempted development regulations to ensure that they support the use of renewable energy for domestic and small business users. Any revisions to the exempted development regulations, for example to permit the construction of small wind turbines without planning permission, would require the approval of both Houses of the Oireachtas.
510 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the premium for taking out a quarterly payment system on motor taxation can be over €100; the way in which this premium can be justified in terms of additional costs; and if he has examined the costs of similar phased payment arrangements in private sector transactions of a similar kind. [23339/06]
The surcharge on non-annual discs is designed to cover the higher administrative costs involved. Current surcharge levels are lower than the maximum permitted under motor tax law, and were slightly reduced in 2001. My Department will continue to keep the level of surcharge under review in light of the expansion of e-motor tax arrangements. A surcharge at the level referred to in the Question would relate to cars over 2.3 litres, which constitute 3% of the national car fleet of 1.6 million.
511 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the situation in which Ballina Town Council are disposing of lands to private housing developers when people in the town of Ballina, County Mayo are on housing lists and a pre-school (details supplied) is seeking a site for a community playschool; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23340/06]
Ballina Town Council have a 15 acre site at Ard Na Rí which they are currently developing. In 2005, the Town Council completed construction of 71 local authority and voluntary houses on almost 9 acres of the site, availing of capital funding provided by my Department.
It is understood from the Town Council that, in order to provide varied tenure types in the development, the Council advertised for expressions of interest from developers to provide private housing on a 2.6 acre portion of the site in 2005. While the Council did not receive any replies to this request, they are still pursuing this course of action which, I understand, has the support of the elected members of the Council.
It is the intention of the Council to provide sporting and community facilities on the balance of the site. The Council are also in discussions with the Ard Na Rí Community Pre-school Group with a view to providing a suitable site in the development for a playschool.
512 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he, or any body under the aegis of his Department have received reports or correspondence in relation to the dangers posed to workers in the asbestos industry here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23352/06]
No such reports or correspondence have come to my Department's attention. In so far as this may relate to asbestos as a waste the primary responsibility for the management of any waste lies with the holder or producer of the waste. The Waste Management Acts 1996-2005 prohibit any person from holding, transporting, recovering or disposing of waste in a manner which causes or is likely to cause environmental pollution, defined in Section 5 to include action which would to a significant extent endanger human health.
Health and safety issues in the workplace generally are a matter for the Health and Safety Authority.
513 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of affordable houses made available in County Meath in 2003, 2004, 2005 and to date in 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23363/06]
Information on the number of housing units provided under the various affordable housing schemes in each local authority area is published in my Department's Housing Statistics Bulletins, copies of which are available in the Oireachtas Library and also on the Department's website at www.environ.ie.
While data is currently being compiled for the first quarter of 2006, provisional figures supplied by Meath County Council indicate that 24 units had been acquired, 59 units were in progress and a further 28 proposed under the various affordable schemes.
514 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the plans that are in place for the upgrading of a sewage system (details supplied); the number of houses that the system was built for and the number currently using it; and the number of times the system has been upgraded. [23414/06]
The Downings Sewerage Scheme was twenty-seventh on the list of water and sewerage schemes submitted by Donegal County Council in response to my Department's request to all local authorities in 2003 to undertake assessments of needs for capital works in their areas and to prioritise their proposals on the basis of these assessments. The priority lists were taken into account in the framing of the Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007. Given the rating afforded to the scheme by the Council, it was not possible to include it in the current Programme.
Local authorities have, however, recently been asked to carry out a new assessment of needs and to review their water and waste water infrastructural priorities in light of economic, demographic and other developments that have taken place since the previous needs assessments were completed. Priorities emerging from this process will be reflected in future phases of the Water Services Investment Programme.
Detailed information in relation to water services in Downings may appropriately be sought from Donegal County Council.
515 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department’s attention has been drawn to the ongoing problems in the village of Rathmullan, County Donegal in relation to the poor infrastructure in the town, the poor quality of water, the continued blockage of storm drains leading to the shore and the condition of the sewage system; and the action his Department will take to alleviate this problem. [23415/06]
The Rathmullan Sewerage Scheme is included in my Department's Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007 as a scheme approved to commence construction in 2007. My Department is awaiting submission of a Preliminary Report for the scheme by Donegal County Council.
The Milford/Rathmullan/Ramelton Water Supply Scheme was twelfth on the list of water and sewerage schemes submitted by Donegal County Council in response to my Department's request to all local authorities in 2003 to undertake assessments of needs for capital works in their areas and to prioritise their proposals on the basis of these assessments. The priority lists were taken into account in the framing of the Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007. Given the rating afforded to the scheme by the Council, it was not possible to include it in the current Programme.
Local authorities have, however, recently been asked to carry out a new assessment of needs and to review their water and waste water infrastructural priorities in light of economic, demographic and other developments that have taken place since the previous needs assessments were completed. Priorities emerging from this process will be reflected in future phases of the Water Services Investment Programme.
The operation and maintenance of water services infrastructure within their area is a matter for Donegal County Council.
516 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 167 and 775 of 8 November 2005, the steps his Department is taking to provide public access to sites at Rathcroghan, County Roscommon; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23444/06]
In agreement with Roscommon County Council and under its responsibility for the conservation of archaeology, my Department has commissioned consultants to carry out a conservation study of the Rathcroghan, County Roscommon archaeological complex. It is intended the study will assist in the development of a conservation framework for the site, which will prioritise features of archaeological importance within the study area and suggest workable policies for their conservation. Issues to be addressed in the study will include the improvement of public access, having regard to the complex ownerships involved. The consultants appointed are required in the execution of their brief to consult with relevant stakeholders in the study area and to complete the preparation of the plan by end 2006.
517 Mr. Ardagh asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when funds will be provided by his Department in order that a person (details supplied) in Dublin 12 will receive the heating grant which has been approved under the Health Service Executive home improvement scheme for older persons. [23452/06]
I assume that the Question refers to the Special Housing Aid for the Elderly Scheme which is operated by the Health Service Executive, formerly the Health Boards, in line with guidelines issued from time to time by the Task Force who administer the scheme under the aegis of my Department. Under the scheme, aid is provided to improve the housing conditions of elderly persons living alone in unfit or unsanitary conditions and was extended in 2000 to include the provision of suitable heating system where found necessary.
An initial allocation of €4.2 million for the scheme was notified to Dublin/North East and Dublin Mid Leinster regions in February 2006 and it is a matter for the HSE Directorate of Services for Older People, which has responsibility for the administration of the scheme, to apportion funding to a particular area.
My Department understands that while the overall funding has not been exhausted, the total allocation apportioned by them to undertake work connected with heating has been used. However, the Eastern Community Works Limited have been requested to consider this matter further with a view to making some additional funding available for the provision of heating until a further allocation of funding will be notified to the Regions following the next meeting of the Task Force.
518 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the amount of funding obtained by Ireland from the European Union for the preservation of heritage buildings over the past five years throughout the country; and the breakdown by county of national expenditure for the preservation of heritage buildings over the same period. [23454/06]
EU co-financing has operated in relation to my Department's Architectural Conservation Grants under the Urban and Village Renewal Scheme. Conservation grants are paid to local authorities and bodies such as Civic Trusts to upgrade public buildings of significant architectural and heritage merit. A sum of €2,141,358 has been recouped from the European Commission in respect of expenditure under this scheme for the years 2001-2004 inclusive. The 2005 claim has yet to be submitted.
My Department funds a scheme of Architectural Conservation Grants for protected structures which is administered by the local authorities. The breakdown by county of expenditure for the years 2001-2005 is outlined at Table 1.
My Department also has overall responsibility for the Built Heritage Capital Programme which is implemented principally through the Office of Public Works. The Heritage Council also provides grant assistance from its overall budget in respect of heritage buildings at risk. The Heritage Council provides a comprehensive breakdown of its expenditure in its annual reports, which have been laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas. Details are also available on its website, www.heritagecouncil.ie.
The breakdown of the Department's funding through the OPW under the Built Heritage capital Programme since 2004 on a county-by-county basis is being compiled and will supplied to the Deputy when completed.
|
Local Authority |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
|
City Councils |
|||||
|
Dublin |
1,478,159.55 |
894,154.57 |
617,376.10 |
853,749.62 |
860,000.00 |
|
Cork |
255,475.11 |
105,265.00 |
98,907.50 |
130,788.72 |
613,640.83 |
|
Galway |
44,095.46 |
17,976.16 |
9,907.40 |
0.00 |
19,338.50 |
|
Limerick |
73,644.81 |
40,000.00 |
20,000.00 |
60,000.00 |
69,423.83 |
|
Waterford |
69,678.15 |
49,477.00 |
40,000.00 |
60,003.00 |
45,875.00 |
|
County Councils |
|||||
|
Carlow |
63,445.00 |
40,000.00 |
30,000.00 |
29,950.00 |
45,000.00 |
|
Cavan |
63,486.90 |
40,000.00 |
40,000.00 |
89,540.00 |
120,000.00 |
|
Clare |
103,420.17 |
92,146.75 |
76,359.00 |
101,300.00 |
139,990.00 |
|
Cork |
402,112.08 |
220,586.78 |
251,075.00 |
371,722.50 |
117,465.00 |
|
Donegal |
58,493.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
96,154.61 |
120,000.00 |
|
Dún Laoghaire/ Rathdown |
351,675.60 |
191,447.00 |
157,650.00 |
205,467.33 |
310,088.70 |
|
Fingal |
205,056.78 |
109,887.04 |
96,106.43 |
99,774.17 |
204,702.00 |
|
Dublin South |
152,417.66 |
104,000.00 |
100,000.00 |
82,674.50 |
175,987.29 |
|
Galway |
102,103.45 |
84,000.00 |
79,835.00 |
107,401.50 |
270,570.00 |
|
Kerry |
128,243.55 |
84,000.00 |
80,000.00 |
115,000.00 |
66,664.00 |
|
Kildare |
64,487.46 |
178,356.25 |
65,533.57 |
151,543.24 |
150,970.31 |
|
Kilkenny |
183,404.78 |
53,237.00 |
79,500.00 |
103,070.00 |
190,000.00 |
|
Laois |
37,787.94 |
40,000.00 |
40,000.00 |
28,392.00 |
120,000.00 |
|
Leitrim |
27,934.24 |
30,000.00 |
16,205.58 |
25,446.00 |
71,474.11 |
|
Limerick |
274,136.45 |
104,000.00 |
106,350.00 |
161,085.00 |
403,070.00 |
|
Longford |
40,255.78 |
25,000.00 |
35,300.00 |
43,833.00 |
84,981.00 |
|
Louth |
74,497.88 |
84,000.00 |
50,500.00 |
84,000.00 |
99,300.00 |
|
Mayo |
17,776.33 |
60,448.00 |
63,445.00 |
60,594.76 |
64,047.00 |
|
Meath |
121,715.82 |
84,000.00 |
78500.00 |
73,900.00 |
169,500.00 |
|
Monaghan |
19,046.07 |
57,137.00 |
82,005.00 |
93,716.90 |
143,755.50 |
|
Offaly |
175,759.68 |
28,574.00 |
43,596.00 |
80,000.00 |
134,449.00 |
|
Roscommon |
54,697.78 |
40,000.00 |
40,000.00 |
60,000.00 |
94,000.00 |
|
Sligo |
22,855.29 |
40,017.57 |
0.00 |
27,911.00 |
89,000.00 |
|
Tipperary North |
0.00 |
40,049.99 |
26,966.54 |
43,789.86 |
96,399.89 |
|
Tipperary South |
116,829.84 |
52,815.30 |
55,000.00 |
162,506.00 |
194,198.71 |
|
Waterford |
86,781.23 |
40,000.00 |
59,790.00 |
60,000.00 |
130,000.00 |
|
Westmeath |
68,502.37 |
30,750.00 |
40,000.00 |
61,680.00 |
110,000.00 |
|
Wexford |
42,297.98 |
54,193.00 |
60,567.00 |
77,000.00 |
262,121.00 |
|
Wicklow |
133,322.50 |
35,500.00 |
54,622.00 |
100,000.00 |
134,449.00 |
|
Total |
5,113,596.71 |
3,151,018.41 |
2,695,097.12 |
3,901,993.71 |
5,920,460.67 |
519 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, further to Parliamentary Question No. 562 of 16 May 2006, he will amend the Environmental Noise Regulations 2006 to encompass movements at small airports or aerodromes that are for training purposes on light aircraft, in view of the significant level of environmental noise generated by such movements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23464/06]
I refer to the reply to Question No. 562 of 16 May 2006. It is not proposed at this stage to regulate in this area beyond the requirements of EU Directive 2002/49/EC which apply to major airports only.
520 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the confusion for people in the counties in Connacht where a person applying for a waste permit has to apply to Mayo County Council which clearly gives the impression to anyone reading the advertisement that this is a matter only affecting Mayo County Council; if it will be made a requirement of the advertisement that it would have to be clearly stated in large print which county the permit was being applied for even though the application is to Mayo County Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23471/06]
The Waste Management (Collection Permit) Regulations, 2001 require applicants for waste collection permits to publish notice of their intention to make a permit application in a newspaper circulating in the area or areas in which the activity concerned is or will be carried on. To ensure that the public are well informed regarding the nature of the application, the newspaper notice must contain as a heading the words "APPLICATION TO [NAME OF THE RELEVANT LOCAL AUTHORITY] FOR A WASTE COLLECTION PERMIT RELATING TO ACTIVITIES IN [NAME OF RELEVANT LOCAL AUTHORITY AREA or AREAS]".
I am satisfied that the requirement to include details in the heading of the newspaper advertisement both of the administering local authorities and the local authority within whose area the activity will take place provides clarity to the public as to the area(s) to which a particular permit application relates.
The consideration of waste permit applications and the decision making process in relation to the granting of waste collection permits, as well as ensuring compliance with the requirements of the regulations, is a matter for the relevant local authority and my Department has no function in the matter.
521 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position regarding the provision of funding for a replacement fire station at Tallow, County Waterford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23547/06]
The provision of funding for a replacement Fire Station at Tallow, Co Waterford is under consideration in my Department in the context of the 2006 fire services capital programme, which I will be announcing in the coming days.
522 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason a person who meets all eligibility criteria for the improvement works in lieu of rehousing scheme is deemed ineligible due to the fact that the local authority does not have first charge as the person has a mortgage on the property; if he will review this situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23583/06]
Under the Improvement Works in Lieu of local authority housing scheme, a local authority may improve or extend a privately owned house to eliminate defects or to provide additional accommodation where it is necessary to eliminate overcrowding or to accommodate a person not at present residing in the house. Persons benefiting under the scheme are required to pay a weekly or monthly charge calculated in relation to their means and the cost of the works carried out by the local authority. My Department is not aware of difficulties at local authority level in the operation of the scheme regarding the issue of the first charge on the property.
523 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if an audit to check the responsiveness of local authorities to representations made by the Houses of the Oireachtas Members since the ending of the dual mandate will be carried out; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23667/06]
The Local Government Act 2001 (Section 237A) Regulations 2003, provide, inter alia, for the supply of specified documentation to Oireachtas Members by the local authority such as local authority budget, draft development plan etc. In addition, equivalent systems, procedures and timeframes to those used in relation to correspondence from local authority members apply also in respect of Oireachtas Members.
As indicated in earlier replies to Questions on this topic, I am concerned that local authorities should at all times facilitate parliamentary representatives, in both the spirit and the letter of the regulations in relation to the timely provision of local authority documentation to members of the Oireachtas carrying out their work on behalf of local communities.
My officials have been engaged in gathering information from local authorities on the practical application of the arrangements to date and arising from this, I will, if necessary issue supplementary guidance to local authorities taking account of the responses on the matter.
524 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the breakdown, in each county and the cost to the Exchequer of paying to end the dual mandate, including details of all costs on a category basis such as gratuity, additional gratuity, representational costs, salary costs, allowances and other expenses paid out; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23668/06]
The costs referred to in the Question are financed by the local authority from their revenue accounts and do not bear directly on the Exchequer. My Department does not have the detailed information requested in the Question, which may appropriately be sought from the individual local authorities concerned.
525 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if there are minimum standards that the local authorities are required to meet with regard to the sizes and internal dimensions of kitchens, bedrooms and bathrooms when building local authority housing. [23699/06]
The Social Housing Design Guidelines published by my Department include recommendations in relation to target floor areas and minimum room sizes for typical dwellings. These floor areas and room sizes were re-examined and amended in 2002 in light of changes to Part M of the Building Regulations which require that all new dwellings be visitable by people with disabilities. These Design Guidelines along with the 2002 amendments are available on the Department's website at www.environ.ie. The Design Guidelines are currently under review and it is expected that draft revised guidelines will be issued shortly for consultation with a view to publication by end 2006.
526 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when the legislation on the protection of pet animals and the promotion of responsible ownership was last reviewed; if his Department has examined international best practice in terms of the legislative framework; his plans to update laws here to provide a more modern and effective framework for this area of growing public concern; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23700/06]
The principal statutes governing animal welfare are the Protection of Animals Acts 1911 and 1965. Responsibility for that legislation, including any proposals for amendment, is a matter for my colleague the Minister for Agriculture and Food.
My Department's functions relate to the provisions of the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992. The main focus of these Acts is the control of stray and dangerous dogs, such as guard dogs, which could present nuisance or danger to the general public or to other animals. The implementation of the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992 is vested in local authorities who have power, inter alia, to appoint dog wardens, to provide shelters for stray and other dogs, to impose on-the-spot fines for a number of offences and to take prosecutions. This legislation is kept under review in my Department.
The report of a Working Group which was established to review the management of dog breeding establishments contained a number of recommendations including recommendations in relation to the introduction of statutorily enforceable standards for the dog breeding industry in Ireland and proposed the introduction of a registration system for dog breeding establishments. On 30 May 2006, I announced my intention to proceed with implementation of the majority recommendations of the Working Group. My Department will now, in consultation with the Department of Agriculture and Food, develop the new system as quickly as possible. This process will include the development of standards for relevant dog breeding establishments and the drafting of new Regulations under the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992.
527 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will provide this Deputy with copies of the assessments reports regarding the application of the Community legislation referred to on page 10 of the Press Release for the 2713th [European] Council Meeting of 9 March 2006; the position she is taking in the June 2006 European Council of Environment Ministers meeting on the issue of whether or not the precautionary principle should be applied to the assessment, as part of the EU’s approval process for genetically modified organisms, of the possible long-term consequences of the use of GMO products; her views, in view of the 28 January 2005 comments by the European Communities on the Scientific and Technical Advice to the WTO panel investigating allegations on the part of the USA, Canada and Australia that the measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products DS291, DS292 and DS293 constituted illegal barriers to trade, of the possibility of intensifying scientific research into the long-term health and environmental implications of GMOs; the importance of considerations as to the long-term health and environmental consequences of the use of GMO products being a part of the EU’s GMO approval process; and when the 2006 European Council of Environment Minister’s meeting will take place. [23715/06]
My Department understands that copies of the assessment reports referred to have not yet been made available to member states by the European Commission.
The forthcoming Environment Council of 27 June 2006 will provide for an exchange of views on GMOs, including specifically on the role of the precautionary principle in the authorisation and risk assessment of GMOs and GMO products. The precautionary principle is already a central component of Ireland's national policy on GMOs; this policy is positive but precautionary based on the Report of the Inter-Departmental Group on Modern Biotechnology published in October 2000.
The EU Commission has recently decided to introduce practical changes to the GMO approval process employed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to enhance the scientific consistency and transparency of GMO decision-making. These will include a requirement that the potential long-term effects of GMOs, as well as bio-diversity issues, are to be addressed more explicitly and with due regard to the uses of the product.
The Commission's approach represents an attempt to bridge the different positions adopted by Member States. I also acknowledge the good work of the Austrian Presidency in organising expert meetings on co-existence and the precautionary principle as these apply to GMOs. Ireland broadly welcomes these developments as contributing to a better understanding among member states of these issues and a more transparent and consistent regulatory regime.
528 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position of a project (details supplied) in County Mayo; if funding has been provided for same; the work which has been carried out on it to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23717/06]
Moorehall, Claremorris, Co. Mayo is in the ownership of Coillte. Any proposals for works there would be a matter for Coillte as owners and any limited grant assistance by my Department would be dependent on discussions with Coillte on the costs involved and an assessment of the future use to which the property might be put.
529 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the locations currently being considered by the affordable homes partnership to develop social and affordable housing in Dublin City and County; the ownership of the lands in question in each case; the timeframe involved in each case in terms of starting development under the affordable homes partnership; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23741/06]
The Affordable Homes Partnership, established in August 2005, has been assigned responsibility for, inter alia, taking steps to bring forward additional land in the Dublin area for housing development, including land that, although not currently zoned for housing, may be suitable for that purpose. The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has issued guidelines in relation to the exercise of this function by the Partnership; and further guidelines for planning authorities, designed to support the outcome of the Partnership's work on this initiative, are currently under consideration.
The Partnership published advertisements in November 2005 inviting interested parties to come forward with proposals for the provision and development of lands mainly for affordable housing. I understand that the Partnership has identified a number of proposals which it considers would be appropriate from a planning point of view and is now engaging with the sponsors of these, with a view to concluding agreements which will secure the delivery of a significant affordable housing yield on the lands in question.
It is expected that the Partnership will conclude this process in relation to a number of sites in the next few weeks and, where necessary, make recommendations to the relevant planning authorities in relation to any appropriate variations to their Development Plans that may be required. Decisions on the making of recommendations in relation to individual sites are a matter for the Board of the Affordable Homes Partnership. Decisions on any consequential Development Plan variations that may be required will be taken up by the planning authorities concerned, taking account of the relevant guidelines referred to above.
531 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government further to various parliamentary questions, when it was decided to re-examine the e-voting system; the person on whose instructions the decision was taken; the persons with whom consultations took place in view of the previous indicators to the effect that the system is unreliable; the name of the firm of consultants who have been given the responsibility for the re-evaluation; their terms of reference and any briefing given to them prior to or since their appointment; the person by whom it was given; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23877/06]
The Government, in May 2005, agreed to a programme of further assessment, testing and validation of the electronic voting and counting system. This programme is intended to address issues raised by the Commission on Electronic Voting (CEV) and demonstrate that the system operates reliably, securely and accurately.
The programme includes the commissioning of a security and risk assessment of all aspects of the system (security measures and in-built protections of the voting equipment hardware and the integrated election software, a review of PC security and system hardening, and a risk analysis of the potential for internal or external interference) and the development of a programme of additional testing. The consultancy has been commissioned by my Department and, following an open procurement process, is being undertaken by Rits Information Security. The work to date has included liaison with officials from my Department, the CEV, Returning Officers, the Local Government Computer Services Board and the system manufacturers.
532 Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the role his Department has with regard to ensuring that contractors hired by local authorities are in compliance with the Construction Industry Registered Employment agreement, Pension assurance and Sick Pay scheme. [23938/06]
I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 209 and 210 of 23 March 2006.
