Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 Sep 2006

Vol. 624 No. 2

Adjournment Debate.

Hospital Services.

The Teamwork report is the latest in a long series of reports on hospital services in the north-east region. Most of these reports have been commissioned for the purpose of supporting the increased centralisation of hospital services and the downgrading of the smaller hospitals in the region. This highly centralised model of hospital care is preferred by the Government and the HSE but it is vitally important to state that this is not the only model of hospital care that exists. At all times, we must challenge the argument that the highly centralised model is the only safe way to deliver hospital services. It is not. Other countries and some parts of this country, to some extent, are doing it differently.

The bottom line is that the Teamwork report recommends the further loss of services at existing hospital sites in the region, namely Monaghan, Cavan, Navan and Dundalk. It is basically a re-hash of the Hanly report, which made similar recommendations about hospitals throughout the Twenty-six counties. The difference with the Teamwork report is that it also holds out the promise, but only the promise, of a new regional hospital. While the carrot of a major new hospital facility will be attractive for some, for the vast majority of people throughout the north east, it spells the end of our hospitals as we have known them and it places that same majority at an even greater risk, given the distances, road and weather conditions that must be faced in journeying to a far-off new hospital location.

The answer to the long standing crisis in our hospital services in the north east lies in the reversal of decisions taken in recent years by the health board and HSE managers, at the behest of the Department of Health and Children and the Minister of the day. We know we cannot have all services available at all sites but we firmly believe that our existing hospital network should be retained, with essential services provided at all five hospitals and specialist services available on an apportioned basis, where appropriate.

The Teamwork report envisages only the most basic of care provision at all existing hospital sites. Minor injuries, routine diagnostics and outpatient clinics will be the order of the day. All surgical and medical emergencies and all accident and emergency treatment will be centred in the new regional hospital. What of travel times from all parts of the north east? What of the so-called "golden hour"? Under this plan, more people are being condemned to death because the doors of hospitals will be closed against them.

The Teamwork report presents an idealised picture of hospital services in the north east, with a new regional hospital in place and with the five existing hospitals working under the new regime. What happens in the meantime, as we wait for years for the new regional hospital to be built, if it is ever built? Already, services have been downgraded further at Monaghan, Dundalk and Navan and ever more pressure is being placed on Cavan General Hospital and the Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda. The picture painted by the Teamwork report relies heavily on an ambulance service which is fully staffed with fully trained paramedics. We do not have such a service. Only a tiny proportion of ambulance crews — some 2% — is trained up to this level, yet under Teamwork, paramedics will be responsible for emergency care until patients reach the new regional hospital.

Do we oppose a new regional hospital? Certainly not, but it must be a hospital that will provide services in addition to, and as an enhancement of, those already being provided at the existing five hospitals. Certainly, major change and real improvements will have to take place in the region. Key services and specialties will be located in the regional hospital, but our focus must be on services as near to the patient and community as possible. Sinn Féin wants to see the configuration of all hospitals to ensure that emergency services are available as locally as possible. For the vast majority of the population, these services should be located less than 45 minute's travel time away. No one should be more than one hour's travel time from an accident and emergency unit, when the three critical access factors of hospital location, road conditions and ambulance provision are taken into account.

The report on the death of Mr. Pat Joe Walsh and the HSE's response to that report fails completely to acknowledge that the embargo on acute surgical services and surgical emergencies being dealt with at Monaghan General Hospital led to that tragic death. The embargo meant that staff at Monaghan General Hospital were prevented from performing a life-saving operation on Pat Joe Walsh. No amount of placing blame on others will dispense with that fact. As highlighted in the report, the matter was compounded by the failure of Cavan and Drogheda hospitals to accept the transfer of Pat Joe Walsh, despite his critical condition and the availability of beds therein.

Monaghan General Hospital is being turned into a five-day week, limited service medical centre. There is consternation at the HSE, which has the full backing of the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Harney, and her Fianna Fáil colleagues in Government, who are dealing the final death blow to Monaghan General Hospital. It is doing a grave disservice to the memory of Pat Joe Walsh that the report emanating on his death is now being used as a tool to aid the objective of further eroding services at the hospital, given that such erosion already contributed to his tragic death.

My party and I pledge our continued and outright opposition to what I can only describe as the scorched earth policy of the HSE and the Government regarding acute hospital services in the north-east region.

I am taking this matter on behalf of my colleague, Deputy Harney, the Minister for Health and Children.

The Government did not write this report or any previous report on Monaghan General Hospital. External consultants were retained to write the reports. One of the consequences of the agitation regarding this hospital is that as each complaint is made about a particular incident, a report is then compiled which does not find favour with those concerned about services in the hospital. All involved should reflect on that fact.

The Health Service Executive has recently established a steering group and a north east project group to oversee a programme designed to improve safety and standards across the acute hospital network in the north-east region. The decision was taken having regard to the issues raised in the report prepared for the HSE by Teamwork Management Services, Improving Safety and Achieving Better Standards — An Action Plan for Health Services in the North East, and taking account of the findings of the recent report into the death of Mr. Patrick J. Walsh. Led by the HSE's National Hospitals Office, the steering group has representation from key stakeholders such as clinicians and primary care providers. The project group is being led by a consultant surgeon from outside the region.

The report concluded that the present system, in which five local hospitals deliver acute care to relatively small populations in the region, is exposing patients to increased risks and creating additional professional risks for staff. The report highlights the need to develop a high quality and responsive emergency and planned service, in line with international standards, by developing local services within existing hospitals and other local centres supported by a new regional hospital.

The HSE recently published the report of the independent inquiry into the death of Mr. Walsh. The report details the difficulties that arose in trying to secure his transfer from Monaghan to either Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, or Cavan General Hospital. It also exposes a failure in communications between clinicians and hospitals in the region.

Since the death of Mr. Walsh, a new protocol in respect of patient transfer has been put in place. It provides that all requests for transfer from Monaghan General Hospital to Cavan General Hospital or Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, should be granted and processed immediately.

International best practice demonstrates that patients have better outcomes when treated in hospitals with appropriate numbers of specialist staff, high volumes of activity and access to the right diagnostic and treatment facilities. Patient safety and quality must be paramount and must be the key drivers in the reconfiguration of our acute hospital services. The policy of the Government is to provide safe, high quality services that achieve the best possible outcomes for patients. This will mean rebalancing service delivery so those services that can be safely delivered locally are delivered locally and that more complex services that require specialist input are concentrated at regional centres.

The HSE has assured the Minister that, in progressing the implementation of the Teamwork report and the report of the independent inquiry into the death of Mr. Walsh, there will be no discontinuation of existing services until suitable alternative arrangements have been put in place.

Planning Issues.

I first raised this matter on 29 September 2005 and highlighted the misuse of management companies in traditional housing estates. I was surprised by the reply to that debate. It was very clear that the information I had placed on the record was news to the Minister. I gave the Minister my evidence and followed it up with a priority question which was afforded to me by my Independent colleagues. The Minister was quite clear in his reply that management companies were not to be used by local authorities to sidestep their responsibilities in taking estates in charge.

I am interested in finding resolutions to the many problems that have been highlighted to me since first raising this matter. I have always accepted the need for management companies in the context of apartment blocks. The regulation of these ranges from good to appalling. I received a phone call yesterday from someone who took up occupancy of an apartment under the affordable housing scheme earlier this year. The person received a bill for €900 from the management company yesterday and is being asked to contribute towards a sinking fund for a lift. However, there is no lift in the apartment block in question and the person is being asked to contribute towards public lighting and public liability insurance in the overall estate, which is a mixed development.

Initially, most management companies' directors are friends or relations of the developer of the scheme. On completion of the last dwelling, the shareholders, in other words the owners of the apartments, are supposed to be called to a meeting at which a new set of directors should be elected by the shareholders. These meetings are either not being called or, where they are being called, there is often reluctance to take on responsibility for what is in effect a company governed by company law.

I typically find that a minimum of one third of the bill charged by a management company is for administrative purposes, even in the early stages. In Kildare, quite a number of the dwellings that will be provided under Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2005 will be apartments, some of which will be of the social and affordable variety. There are already problems in that the council is telling residents to contact their management company and very often, they do not respond. It is not clear how the council will be represented on these management companies and the person or persons representing the council will need to be sufficiently competent in company law or problems will arise for it. I ask that this issue be considered seriously.

Consider those living in housing estates where a management company was or is mandatory. Conditions of this kind are sometimes attached to the planning permission but many are conditions of sale. Not only does the developer want to make a killing on the price of the house but he wants the residents to pick up the tab for all the maintenance obligations until the estate is taken in charge. While it appears local authorities no longer impose these conditions, which is very welcome, management companies continue to be imposed as part of a condition of sale in many locations. This needs to be addressed in legislation.

In some locations, including my own, there is a considerable backlog. Kildare has front-loaded the taking in charge of estates where a planning condition was imposed requiring a management company. However, it depends on the estate being finished satisfactorily. Some local authorities, particularly those in areas with continuous and rapid development, are concerned with the costs they will incur when large numbers of estates are taken in charge. While they might have large capital receipts that will go towards the provision of infrastructure, there is a serious problem with the revenue accounts. That needs to be factored into the local government fund if the problem is to be resolved properly.

The staff embargo also needs to be considered. Restrictions are such that where a development control unit is put in place, it is done at the expense of other sections of the council. In the case of Kildare, there seems to be an ever-increasing list of unauthorised developments and the price is being paid for it.

The Office of Corporate Enforcement is receiving large numbers of complaints about management companies not being run properly. I constantly get calls from people asking if they should go along to the annual general meeting and whether they should allow the developer to walk away. The planning conditions attaching to a development are often not complied with. Residents cannot see what they are paying for. A number of initiatives have been suggested and a consultation paper is expected shortly. The National Consumer Agency is to produce an information document, but it depends what is in it. The amendment to company law expected later this year seems to be piecemeal in comparison with the extent of the problem, which requires legislation in its own right.

I reply on behalf of Deputy Roche, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

I thank the Deputy for raising this matter. I accept there is much concern about the management of multi-unit developments. Many of the issues in the area involve several different parties in the public and private sector. I know the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government is actively engaging with those parties. The Department looks forward to the publication by the Law Reform Commission of the consultation paper on the management of multi-unit structures. It is expected shortly and will be followed by a final report that will enable the Government to consider what legal measures must be taken in the area.

In the meantime, several developments have taken place regarding this matter. Planning authorities traditionally required, as a condition of planning permission, that a management company be established for apartment developments. In response to concerns that planning conditions requiring management companies were being inappropriately applied to other residential estates, the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government carried out a survey of county, city and borough councils in late 2005 and early 2006. It found that planning authorities had been attaching planning conditions requiring management companies in mixed developments of apartments and houses, but generally only to the apartment elements. Regarding estates comprising houses only, planning authorities had occasionally attached such conditions, but only in very specific circumstances, for example, holiday home or gated developments.

The Department issued a circular letter to planning authorities on the matter in July 2006. It states that a management company should not be conditioned by a planning authority for a "traditional" housing estate, that is, estates of houses with individual private gardens, except in very specific circumstances, for example, if a particular service or facility is provided for residents' use only, such as a playground. The Department has also advised planning authorities that they should attach planning conditions to the ongoing management of shared facilities only in circumstances where they judge that they are clearly required for the benefit of residents of an estate.

A previous circular issued in January 2006 had already reminded planning authorities of their responsibilities under the Planning and Development Act 2000 regarding the taking in charge of such estates.

The question of who should be responsible for the maintenance of certain shared facilities in the newer type of mixed estate, that is, whether and to what extent planning authorities should take those in charge or what responsibilities residents should have for maintenance, requires further consideration.

The Department has therefore established a working group representative of the interests involved to look further at those matters. Its first meeting is being held today.

The property services regulatory authority will have the function of licensing, regulating and dealing with complaints relating to managing agents. These are commercial firms engaged by management companies to carry out day-to-day management and maintenance. The authority will also have a public information function regarding property management. The authority and its functions will be provided for in legislation currently being prepared by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. I understand an implementation group and a director designate are already in place.

The National Consumer Agency is to publish a report on the issue of management charges very shortly and also intends to publish a consumer information document, which should help reduce the information deficit.

The Law Reform Commission, LRC, has already recommended certain changes to company law to avoid problems for management companies regarding company law requirements. Proposals for the amendment of company law are expected to be made to the Government later this year, and the Minister expects those to include certain changes relevant to management companies.

The Minister is conscious these are matters of great concern, and every effort is being made to address them in the most appropriate manner.

Customs and Excise.

The remaining two matters are related. I will call on Deputy Burton, who has five minutes, and Deputy Gregory, who also has five minutes. The Minister of State will give a single reply.

I can give a joint reply, but I have two separate texts, since the issue raised by Deputy Gregory is being addressed by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Deputy McDowell.

In that case, they can be taken separately. I call Deputy Burton.

I have raised the issue of airport smuggling checks on several occasions, as have certain party colleagues. As the Minister of State has pointed out, customs regulation is ultimately a function of the Department of Finance and the Revenue Commissioners. I call for the introduction of permanent customs and security checks at Weston Executive Airport and all the other small airports around the country following yesterday's seizure of drugs from a passenger and the arrest of the pilot and co-pilot on a flight to Belgium that originated there.

Small airports dotted around the country unsurprisingly offer great opportunities for smuggling drugs, goods and even people into Ireland and the EU. I congratulate gardaí on the success of their operation in co-operation with Belgian police. They intercepted a massive quantity of heroin that would otherwise have made it onto the streets of Ireland, Britain or mainland Europe and brought misery to people's lives.

However, that two Irishmen were arrested and that the flight originated at a private Irish airport, that an Irish plane was used, and that no security was in place suggests that our small airports risk being used as staging-posts in the international drugs trade. Criminals are clearly able to charter private aircraft and proceed to rendezvous points either in this country or abroad without the authorities knowing of their cargo or the purpose of their journey. That is extraordinary, and the Government must move quickly to address that anomaly, particularly as we all know that in Celtic tiger Ireland there has been massive growth in the ownership of private aeroplanes and helicopters.

Moreover, it is staggering that private individuals can lease their aircraft or allow them to be used by others, as was the suggestion yesterday regarding Mr. Mansfield, the owner of the plane. I understand his company also owns Weston Aerodrome. He appears to have been completely in the dark regarding what the aeroplane was being used for. There must clearly be a wholesale review of security arrangements, and especially customs arrangements, at every airport in the country. We cannot have Ireland as a drop-off point or staging-post for the international drugs trade.

Weston's location in west Dublin and the severe problems of gang and drug violence on the entire west side of the city, of which I know the Minister of State is acutely aware, make it a particularly vulnerable target. If one adds to that the absolute lack of community policing there and the intelligence that such policing would provide, one sees that we are very vulnerable. We want the kind of surveillance at those small airports that one has nowadays in Dublin Airport. Statistics on seizures there show that the use of sniffer dogs and more up-to-date technology to track flights and so on will, over a period, produce results.

We clearly now have an unlocked door at small airports regarding smuggling and the international drugs trade. We saw in the Ryder Cup the massive use of private helicopters and aircraft in and out of Weston and similar locations on the west side of Dublin. Thankfully, what happened this time has ended with some success for the policing authority. However, a plan must be put in place immediately, and we clearly require the co-operation not only of the customs authorities and the Minister for Finance but of the Garda and policing authorities.

I make this reply on behalf of the Minister for Finance and the Customs Service of the Office of the Revenue Commissioners. I thank Deputy Burton for raising this matter.

The Customs Service of the Office of the Revenue Commissioners has primary responsibility for the prevention, detection, interception and seizure of controlled drugs at importation. It has particular responsibility for implementing import controls at points of entry to the State, specifically at ports and airports, including licensed airfields, and on the land frontier. The control of licensed airfields in the State is carried out by customs enforcement teams. Those are dedicated anti-smuggling teams that focus on the smuggling of prohibited drugs and fiscal products.

Other duties undertaken by officers in attending licensed airfields include the clearance of aircraft and passengers arriving from third countries, spot checks on EU flights, the verification of fuel drawback claims, verification of end-use authorisations, clearance of aircraft under transfer of residence, and checks on private aircraft to ensure compliance with import procedures.

Best practice in customs administration worldwide shows that the development of information and intelligence is critical to the detection of drug smuggling. In Ireland, this has become very important since the completion of the Single Market in 1993, based as it is on the free movement of goods and people within the Community. As EU citizens have the right of free movement, Revenue has no power to stop an EU citizen except on the basis of a suspicion, normally grounded in specific intelligence.

A number of years ago, Revenue introduced a memorandum of understanding initiative, which involved reaching agreement with a number of organisations, trade associations and individual companies in the transport industry to encourage them to join the fight against drug smuggling as part of the Customs Drugs Watch programme. The programme incorporates a coastal and airfield reporting system whereby local customs officers visit all licensed aerodromes and airfields regularly. They have put in place a confidential system of communication between the licensed aerodrome operators and customs enforcement. Through this network, which is two-way, officers have discussed with the operators such matters as known methods used by drug smugglers and indicators of suspicious activity. This can help the operators in identifying situations and activities that may indicate a drug smuggling operation is under way and which they should report. This reporting system is an important element in the fight against drug smuggling.

In addition to local intelligence, the Customs and Excise shares and receives information and intelligence on drug smuggling from a number of international bodies, including the World Customs Organisation, United Nations Drug Control Programme, Interpol, Council of Europe, Europol and the UK's Serious Organised Crime Agency.

Customs and Excise liaises on an ongoing basis with other national and international enforcement services such as the Garda Síochána, the Naval Service, the Air Corps, and foreign customs and police services. It takes part regularly in European, bilateral and national surveillance operations focused on specific drug smuggling methodologies, including general aviation. Some of these operations have been specifically directed at light aircraft and helicopter movements.

The Deputy will appreciate that it would be inappropriate for the Minister to comment in detail on specific operations in the criminal area of drug smuggling. The reported seizure earlier this week in Belgium of 50 kg of heroin, the arrest of three Irish nationals and the seizure of an aircraft based at Weston Aerodrome are of major concern to the Revenue Commissioners. To give an indication of the volume of arrivals in the State through Weston, the Minister understands that from February 2006 to the end of July 2006 there have been 142 flight arrivals from EU countries there and five from non-EU countries. This is in comparison with 1,500 flights every week arriving in Dublin Airport. It should be noted that drugs to the value of €6.7 million have been seized by Customs and Excise to date in 2006 at Dublin Airport.

In 2004, officers attached to the Dublin enforcement district carried out 12 planned and six unplanned visits to Weston. During 2005, ten planned and six unplanned and to-date in 2006, 11 planned and three unplanned visits have been made to Weston by officers of the Revenue's customs service.

In light of the Belgian seizure this week, the Minister is advised that the Revenue Commissioners are reviewing the risks attached to the operation of, and procedures attaching to, all 27 licensed aerodromes in the State, including in particular Weston. I am assured that the monitoring of licensed aerodromes in the State by the Revenue Commissioners is in line with international standards. The Revenue's customs service is continually engaged in the analysis and evaluation of seizure trends, routes and smuggling risks and consequential resource deployment. All Customs and Excise operations are risk focused, and staff are deployed to combat areas of greatest risk. The level of activity at licensed aerodromes is constantly monitored from a risk perspective.

However, in light of the concerns raised by the seizure this week, the conditions under which the Revenue Commissioners approve licensed aerodromes will be immediately reviewed. The review will include options for improving the level of control and prior reporting of arrivals from EU and non-EU countries. Revenue will also review the frequency of checking incoming flights to these aerodromes.

My issue is substantially the same. I am glad to hear the Minister of State state that the Customs and Excise cover is now being reviewed. The local Independent Deputy for the Weston area, however, Deputy Catherine Murphy, who is present, raised this issue with the Minister on Question Time in February this year. In the reply on that occasion, the Minister accepted that customs officers should visit the aerodrome regularly as a check against the landing or exploitation of prohibitive goods, in particular controlled drugs, but it did not happen. It is now water under the bridge, but I hope the Minister will be somewhat more attentive when these issues are raised in the future.

I note that the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Lenihan, in his reply on behalf of the Minister for Finance, said that the total value of drugs that came into Dublin Airport in one year which were seized came to €6.7 million. Despite this, one flight to Weston yesterday could have brought in €10 million worth of the worst of drugs, heroin. It is no wonder that licence cover should now be reviewed. This is in the context of the seizure of a consignment of heroin valued at €7 million at Ratoath, County Meath, a couple of months ago. These amounts of heroin are unprecedented in the history of the drugs crisis in this State. It seems to be in the context of the enormous heroin crop in Afghanistan in recent times. Whatever happened via Weston when the Belgian authorities were able to seize the drugs demonstrates the sophisticated level the international drugs trade has reached. Unfortunately, the replies to Deputy Catherine Murphy in this House indicate that this State has not reached the same sophisticated level in response to these issues. I hope to heaven that it does respond effectively.

One other aspect of this concerns me. Apparently an executive jet with half a dozen people on board or whatever can land at Weston and they can just step into a taxi on the tarmac and drive off. That is quite incredible in this day and age. There is no check by the Garda or Customs and Excise or anybody. We know the owners of Weston have not got a great record in terms of their respect for the law of this land. I am not sure why the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Lenihan, finds this so amusing. I do not find it amusing. Neither do I believe does Deputy Catherine Murphy, who has raised this issue for a long time, find it amusing.

The reality is that this plane was owned by Mr. Mansfield. It came——--

The Deputy should not raise the names of private individuals in the House as they have no way of defending themselves.

It is not the first time he has been mentioned here. The Leas-Cheann Comhairle did not mention that to the previous speaker who raised his name. However——

He should not be mentioned in this context. The Deputy should not abuse the privilege of the House.

I am simply stating something that is a matter of public record, namely, that he has no regard for the planning laws of this State in particular. I find that an additional worrying aspect to the manner in which this airport has been used by the international drugs trade. I hope all these issues are addressed. I have already raised this issue on the floor of the House in the context of the Criminal Justice (Mutual Assistance) Bill today. I called on the Minister to ensure that the Criminal Assets Bureau thoroughly investigates all those connected with that drugs operation in Belgium.

I thank Deputy Gregory for raising this important issue and giving me the opportunity, on behalf of the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, to update the House on this matter.

The reported seizure earlier this week in Belgium of 50 kg of heroin, the arrest of three Irish nationals and the seizure of an aircraft based at Weston Aerodrome is a matter of major concern to the Government. All attempts at large-scale smuggling of illegal drugs into this country need to be considered in the context in which such activity takes place. The global illicit drugs trade, according to the United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime, is reputed to exceed billions of dollars annually. The key drivers for this phenomenon include both economics and the attitude of societies towards illicit drug consumption.

The economic environment impacts on illicit drug consumption and supply in two principal ways. First, the increased prosperity brought about by globalisation and by the development of our own economy has provided significant disposable income to most citizens. This has pulled the demand for drugs within the State, as well as making Ireland a popular market for criminal organisations involved in the international drugs market. Second, globalisation itself has caused international trade in both goods and services to increase exponentially over the past decade, making it easier for criminal networks to conceal illicit commodities within legitimate freight. As a small open economy Ireland is particularly vulnerable. The economics of drug trafficking make it a particularly attractive activity for criminal organisations. This is principally driven by the considerable financial rewards which can accrue at each stage of the trafficking process. With the potential for high profit margins which the business of drug trafficking can facilitate, it is hardly surprising that drug trafficking and distribution is such an attractive prospect for organised crime.

The second major factor influencing the illicit drugs trade is the attitude within societies to the consumption of illicit drugs. Ireland continues to record significant levels of drug prevalence, as demonstrated by the results of the most recent comprehensive drug prevalence study conducted by the national advisory committee on drugs in 2002 and 2003. The significant demand for illegal drugs by Irish citizens fuels the drugs trade as well as the organised criminal gangs that supply and distribute illegal drugs within this society. The national drugs strategy addresses the problem of drug misuse across a number of pillars — supply reduction, prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and research — and implementation of the strategy across a range of Departments and agencies is co-ordinated by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.

The criminal justice response is primarily, though not exclusively, in the area of drug supply control and the Garda plays a key role in tackling the problem of drug misuse locally, nationally and internationally. Garda strategies for dealing with drug offences are designed to undermine the activities of organised criminal networks involved in the trafficking and distribution of illicit drugs. These strategies include gathering intelligence on individuals and organisations involved in the distribution of drugs, conducting targeted operations on criminal networks based on intelligence gathered and working in collaboration with other law enforcement agencies within and outside the jurisdiction to address the national as well as international aspects of drug trafficking and distribution. These strategies continue to result in operational successes as evidenced by the ongoing levels of drugs seized by the Garda. The trafficking and distribution of all illicit drugs at local, national and international level is constantly monitored by the Garda.

The Customs and Excise service of the Revenue Commissioners has primary responsibility for the prevention, detection, interception and seizure of controlled drugs at importation. The service has particular responsibility for implementing import controls at points of entry to the State, specifically at ports, airports, including licensed airfields, and on the land frontier. A number of the specific measures being undertaken by both the Garda and the customs service to address the issues raised by the Deputy include continued co-operation between the Garda and the Customs and Excise service under the terms of the memorandum of understanding in place between both agencies in the proactive investigation of persons suspected to be involved in international drug trafficking; continued liaison with various law enforcement agencies throughout Europe through Europol and Interpol; ongoing formal and informal contact with management of aerodromes throughout the country; ongoing liaison with the Irish Aviation Authority in regard to the registration of aircraft and licensing of flight crews; rigorous checks on the issue of airside passes at larger airports to flight crews of smaller aircraft; and the customs drug watch programme which incorporates a coastal and airfield reporting system whereby local customs officers visit all licensed aerodromes and airfields regularly. This also includes a confidential system of communication between the licensed aerodrome operators and the Customs and Excise service. In addition to local intelligence, the customs service shares and receives information and intelligence on drug smuggling from a number of international bodies.

In light of the Belgian seizure this week, the Minister has been advised that the Revenue Commissioners are reviewing the risks attached to the operation of all 27 licensed aerodromes in the State, including Weston. The Government has been assured that the monitoring of licensed aerodromes in the State by the Revenue Commissioners is currently in line with international standards. The Customs and Excise service is continuously engaged in the analysis and evaluation of seizure trends, routes and smuggling risks and consequential resource deployment. All customs operations are risk focussed and staff are deployed to combat areas of greatest risk. The level of activity at licensed aerodromes is constantly monitored from a risk perspective. However, in light of the concerns raised by the seizure this week, the conditions of under which the Revenue Commissioners approve licensed aerodromes will be immediately reviewed. This review will include options for improving the level of control and prior reporting of arrivals from EU and non-EU countries. The Revenue Commissioners will also review the frequency of checking incoming flights to these aerodromes.

The Government's top policing priority for 2006 is to target organised crime, including drug trafficking, and to ensure that the necessary strategies and measures are in place to tackle the problem.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.25 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 3 October 2006.
Top
Share