Vol. 629 No. 5
7 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects to receive the research commissioned by the Financial Regulator and the Combat Poverty Agency on the nature and extent of debt incurred by low income families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43124/06]
40 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he will introduce legislation to put MABS on a statutory footing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43292/06]
83 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the recently published MABS statistics regarding borrowing by low income families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43291/06]
89 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the latest support he has given to the Money Advice and Budgeting Service in view of the concerns expressed by the organisation that they are being swamped with requests for advice; his views on the increasing levels of personal debt among families here; his further views on whether the structures and organisation of MABS require reform to cope with these new circumstances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43133/06]
96 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has had discussions or plans to have discussions with representatives of the credit union movement with a possible view to providing additional credit options for low income families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43125/06]
114 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when the promised new legislation to place the Money Advice and Budgeting Service on a statutory basis will be published; the principal areas in which it will differ from the Bill published in 2002; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43126/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 7, 40, 83, 89, 96 and 114 together.
The Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS) provides assistance to people who are overindebted and need help and advice in coping with debt problems. There are 52 independent companies nation-wide operating the service. The credit union movement has been a key partner in MABS since its inception and their involvement and support is central to the development and success of the service. Other voluntary and statutory bodies such as the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, the Community Welfare Service, Citizens' Information Centres, Centres for the Unemployed and local authorities work closely with the programme.
In 2006, €16.4 million was provided to fund the service representing an increase of 20% on the previous year. In 2007, I have further increased the annual allocation to €17.64 million. Last year, almost 27,000 people availed of the service as compared with 18,000 in 2001. The growth in demand for the service can be attributed to the increase in the availability of credit generally in the economy and to the quality of the service provided by the MABS advisers. The issues that give rise to problems of over-indebtedness for people are highly complex. The cost and availability of credit for people on low incomes and the barriers they face in accessing mainstream and cheap forms of credit add to the difficulties people on low incomes encounter in managing their finances.
I have held discussions with a number of interests including the Irish League of Credit Unions and the Financial Regulator about these issues. One outcome of these consultations is that research has been initiated by the Financial Regulator with the help of the Combat Poverty Agency to find out more about the nature and the extent of financial exclusion in Ireland and the barriers faced by people on low incomes in accessing a wide range of financial services. The report entitled ‘Financial Exclusion in Ireland — An Exploratory Study and Policy Review' was launched by the Financial Regulator on Monday 11th December. The report is being considered by my Department at present.
The findings of the research, together with the comprehensive statistical data now emerging from the new MABSIS information system will make a significant contribution to our knowledge about the problems of debt in Ireland and the situations that leave people on low incomes vulnerable to high cost credit services. I plan to bring proposals to the Government shortly to establish the Money Advice and Budgeting Service board on a statutory basis while retaining the voluntary input so vital to MABS. My proposals for legislation will build on the best features of the MABS model of service to the public. The proposals will combine a continuation of local voluntary involvement with strong national leadership. This will ensure a high quality and coordinated budgeting and advice service for the future, in particular for people on low incomes.
The proposals for the new legislation will take account of the significant developments which have taken place in MABS since the previous Bill was published in 2002. They will be informed by the outcome of consultations with a range of individuals and groups as well as the expert views of key MABS interests including money advisers, MABS voluntary boards of management and other stakeholders such as the credit union movement and the Financial Regulator.
The proposals will take account of best practice in corporate governance for a customer focussed service that provides value for money for the taxpayers investment and meets the challenges posed by the rapidly changing face of debt in 21st century Ireland.
I have asked my officials, in drawing up the legislation, to seek legal advice to determine if provisions can be included that address the issue of what appears to be the unacceptably high level of interest rates currently being charged by financial institutions and loan companies.
The MABS is highly regarded and respected and it is my intention that this continue to be the case. I believe the support structure put in place by my Department for the MABS in recent years has worked well for clients of the service, for local management and for the staff. The legislation I will be bringing forward will further underpin the service.
8 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of PRSA holders; the percentage and number of the working population who have not made additional pension provision; the percentage and number of the working population who have additional pension coverage; the percentage of the working population who hold PRSAs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43277/06]
23 Mr. Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the measures that have been taken and that are planned to increase long term pension provision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43301/06]
44 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has completed his consideration of the recent report he received from the Pensions Board entitled Special Savings for Retirement Report on Mandatory Pension System; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43136/06]
76 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress that he has made since 2002 in ensuring that lower income groups have an earnings related pension when they retire; the figures for supplementary pension coverage for low income groups in 2002 and 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43286/06]
78 Mr. Mulcahy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the action he is taking to ensure sustainable long term pension provision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43216/06]
82 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects that the promised Green Paper on Pensions will be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43135/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 8, 23, 44, 76, 78 and 82 together.
The most recent results from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) Quarterly National Household Survey show that in the first quarter of 2005 51.5% of those at work had supplementary pension coverage. With a working population of just over 2 million, these figures suggest that about 1.03 million workers have a supplementary pension cover with 0.97 million without such cover. At the end of September 2006, a total of 83,790 PRSAs had been opened which represents just over 4% of those at work.
The Quarterly National Household Survey does not provide information on the income of those with supplementary pension cover. However, an analysis of EU-SILC data undertaken in the context of the Pensions Board report on mandatory pensions suggests that coverage varies from 9.5% to 37.6% in the bottom four income deciles. Pensions coverage for the key National Pensions Policy Initiative target group, those aged 30 years and over, stood at 58.6% in the 1st quarter of 2005. This coverage rate has moved little in recent years.
As the House will be aware, in early 2005 I asked the Pensions Board to undertake a review of overall pensions strategy because I considered that, on the basis of the progress being made at that time, there was little prospect of reaching our targets for pensions coverage within a reasonable timescale. The Pensions Board completed its work in November 2005 and I published the National Pensions Review report in January this year.
The Board reaffirmed the various targets recommended in the original National Pensions Policy Initiative which included a retirement income, from all sources, of 50% of pre-retirement income, a social welfare pension equating to 34% of average industrial earnings and a supplementary pensions coverage rate of 70% for those aged over 30 years. The Pensions Board has recommended enhancements to the current voluntary system of supplementary pensions as it considers that it has the potential to deliver significant improvements in coverage.
However, no truly voluntary pensions system has been able to deliver the sort of coverage rates for which we are aiming. In that context, I asked the Pensions Board to explore in more detail the ideas for a mandatory or quasi-mandatory system which had been set out in the National Pensions Review.
In August, the Government published the Pensions Board report, Special Savings for Retirement, in which the Board suggested a model which could be considered if it were decided that a mandatory system of supplementary pensions was required. The model was aimed at low to middle earners and entails mandatory contributions of 15%, shared between employers, employees and the Exchequer, on earnings between €15,000 and €60,000. This would be backed up by an improved social welfare pension, which would increase from a current level of 33% of Gross Average Industrial Earnings to 40%. A timescale of 10 years was suggested for full implementation.
As the House is aware the Government has committed itself to producing a Green Paper on pensions as part of the social partnership agreement Towards 2016. The Green Paper will outline the major policy choices, the challenges in this area and the views of the social partners. The two reports completed by the Pensions Board — the National Pensions Review and their report on mandatory pensions, Special Savings for Retirement will be major inputs to the Green Paper.
It is expected that the Green Paper will be published by the end of March next year. Following a consultation process, the Government will publish a framework for future pensions policy later in the year.
9 Mr. Kirk asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the effect the Budget 2007 measures to support older people will have; his reasons for adding a mobile phone option to the telephone allowance scheme; the impact this will have on persons with prepaid phones; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43163/06]
64 Mr. Ardagh asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the impact of the Budget 2007 measures to support older people; the reason he introduced a mobile phone option to the telephone allowance scheme; the way it will be of help to persons on prepaid phones; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43161/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 9 and 64 together.
Since taking Office this Government has made the needs of older people a priority with the inclusion of several commitments in the Programme for Government aimed specifically at this group. I am very pleased to say that we have delivered on our commitment to bring the basic State Pension (non-contributory) to €200 a week by increasing it by €18. In addition, the State pension (contributory) has increased by €16 a week to €209.30. The effect of these unprecedented increases is that since 1996, and including increases granted in the current year, pensions have increased by almost 119%, or about 57% in real terms, faster than both price and wages growth over the period.
I am also making significant progress on the Government commitment to increase the Qualified Adult Allowance for spouses and partners of contributory pensioners to the level of the State pension (non-contributory). The Budget 2007 increase of €23.70 per week in the qualified adult payment will benefit some 35,500 couples.
In addition, this improvement will bring the Qualified Adult Allowance for those aged 66 years of age and over to 86.5% of the target rate contained in the Government commitment.
In Budget 2006, for the first time in many years, I increased the basic income disregard for the purposes of the means test for non-contributory pensions to €20 per week. At the same time, I introduced incentives for pensioners on means tested payments, who may wish to earn extra income, to continue in employment, with €100 per week earnings disregarded. I was happy to be able to build on these improvements by increasing the basic means disregard to €30 per week and enhancing the employment earnings disregard to €200 per week. These measures will benefit approximately 26,000 pensioners a week who are currently in receipt of a reduced rate of pension. As a consequence, for them, the additional increases in the personal rate will be up to €10 per week while the Qualified Adult rate will further increase by up to €6.60 per week.
These pensioners will, of course, also benefit from the general €18 per week increase in the personal rate of payment and, where relevant, the €11.90 increase in the payment for qualified adults. The overall effect of these changes means that some non-contributory pensioner couples will gain by over €46 per week from January.
In addition to improvements to pensions and qualified adult allowances, I introduced a range of other measures which will benefit older people.
In order to further develop the telephone allowance to respond to the expanding telecommunications market and to facilitate greater customer choice of telephone services, I expanded the telephone allowance to include mobile phones. This is a particularly important step given the high level of mobile phone ownership in Ireland now and the fact that some households do not have land lines at all. It will also assist in achieving the objectives of the scheme which are to ensure access to help in an emergency and to provide an element of security as well as to encourage social contact and to assist in the prevention of social isolation for those living alone.
Under these new arrangements which will be implemented in April 2007, people will have a choice as to whether the allowance is applied to their mobile phone or to their landline. In order to facilitate pay-as-you-go mobile phones, where the allowance is applied to a mobile phone it will be paid as a cash amount of €24.70 per month which includes the VAT.
I also extended eligibility for the companion free travel pass to those aged 66 to 74 who are certified as medically unfit to travel unaccompanied. This will take effect from March 2007.
I have also announced the introduction, early next year, of an all Ireland Free Travel scheme which will allow Irish pensioners to travel throughout Northern Ireland free of charge on public transport, while Northern pensioners will be able to do likewise here.
I have also provided for improvements for carers which will be of benefit to older people. I have increased the income disregard for carers allowance by €30 to €320 per week for a single person and by €60 to €640 per week for a couple. I have increased the rate of carer's allowance for people aged over 66 by €18 per week to €218 per week.
I was very pleased to introduce fundamental structural reforms in this area whereby people in receipt of another social welfare payment, such as the State pension (contributory), who are also providing full time care and attention to a person, will be able to retain their main welfare payment and receive another payment, depending on their means, the maximum of which will be equivalent of a half rate carer's allowance. The precise details regarding how this new arrangement will operate are being examined and will be set out in legislation early next year. The measure will come into effect in September 2007.
I am conscious of the high heating costs that many pensioners face. That is why I recently made provision for increases in the electricity and gas element of the household benefits package of free schemes. In Budget 2007, I have made further progress with regard to assistance with heating cost which will benefit a significant number of people, many of whom are pensioners. I increased the rate of the national fuel allowance by €4 to €18 per week, from January 2007. I also increased the income threshold for eligibility for fuel allowance from €51 to €100 per week thereby enabling more people to qualify for the scheme.
I was very pleased that EU SILC data for 2005 showed a significant drop in the risk of poverty for older people and this did not include the 2006 or 2007 increases. Accordingly, I am confident that the reduction in poverty risk will be maintained and, indeed, improved on as a result of the improvements I have made in Budget 2007.
10 Mr. Mulcahy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the increases in the weekly earnings threshold for maternity and adoptive benefit; the impact he expects that these changes will have; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43217/06]
17 Mr. Curran asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will explain the increase in the weekly earnings threshold for maternity and adoptive benefit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43153/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 10 and 17 together.
Last week, I was pleased to announce an increase in the ceiling on reckonable earnings applied to maternity benefit from €332 to €350 per week for 2007. This will raise the maximum rate of payment — based on 80% of reckonable earnings — from €265.60 to €280 per week with effect from 1st January, 2007. The minimum rate of maternity benefit payment will be raised concurrently from €182.60 to €207.80 per week.
As the rates of adoptive benefit are linked to the maternity benefit scheme (i.e. to ensure that the same level of support is afforded to both natural and adoptive parents), those in receipt of adoptive benefit will equally gain from the above changes in maternity payments.
This Department pays both maternity and adoptive benefit to workers who have accrued the required number of PRSI contributions on their social insurance record and who could otherwise be without income during a period of entitlement to statutory leave in respect of a birth or an adoption. These payments are funded from social insurance contributions paid by workers and employers.
The maternity benefit measures will cost a total of €10.96 million to implement (i.e. €8.42 million for the change to the ceiling and €2.54 million for the change in the minimum rate of payment — respectively) and the adoptive benefit rate increases will cost a total of €44,000.
It is estimated that some 11,500 women will benefit each week from the increase in the earnings ceiling applied to maternity benefit. An additional 2,200 women will benefit each week from the increase in the minimum rate of maternity benefit payment. Furthermore, it is estimated that some 60 persons will benefit each week from the adoptive benefit rate increases.
In addition to these improvements in rates of payment there have also been recently announced extensions to the periods for which benefits are payable. With effect from 1st March, 2007, the total period of statutory maternity leave attracting a payment will be twenty-six weeks and that of statutory adoptive leave attracting a payment will be twenty-four weeks — a four-week extension in each case.
The changes announced in Budget 2007 build on increases already made to the payment duration of both maternity and adoptive benefit in last year's Budget.
11 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will report on progress being made in relation to the implementation of proposed policy changes aimed at addressing the needs of lone parents as set out in the Government Discussion Paper Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents. [43248/06]
21 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress on removing the cohabitation rule as a condition for receiving lone parent payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43279/06]
34 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects to complete his consideration of the proposed new package of reforms of State aid for lone parents; when he expects to bring forward specific proposals; if such proposals will be included in his budget package; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43132/06]
47 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress to date in introducing the new parental allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43262/06]
81 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress regarding the proposals for supporting lone parents; and when he envisages that new proposals will be brought before Dáil Éireann. [43252/06]
87 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the fact that some lone parents are being discriminated against due to the cohabitation rule; and when he proposes to rectify this anomaly. [43256/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 11, 21, 34, 47, 81 and 87 together.
The Government discussion paper, Proposals for Supporting Lone Parents, put forward proposals for the expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities for lone parents; the extension of the National Employment Action Plan to focus on lone parents; focused provision of childcare; improved information services for lone parents and the introduction of a new social assistance payment for low income families with young children. The paper also proposed the abolition of the cohabitation rule as a condition for receipt of the proposed social assistance payment.
One of the proposals in the report was that the upper income limit for the new social assistance payment should be set at €400 per week. Last year, in Budget 2006, I increased the upper income limits on the one parent family payment from €293 to €375 per week, moving a substantial way towards this limit. In this year's Budget I completed this element of the proposal by increasing the upper income limit for the one parent family payment to €400 per week.
The new social assistance payment, currently being developed by officials in my Department will have the long term aim of assisting people to achieve financial independence through supporting them to enter employment, the avenue that offers the best route out of poverty.
Any proposed new payment can only be introduced when the necessary co-ordinated supports and services are put in place by other Departments and Agencies. This is why the Government has instructed the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion to draw up an implementation plan to progress the non-income recommendations in tandem with the development of the legislation required in my Department to introduce a new payment scheme.
Work on the development of this implementation plan is currently under way. Issues including access to childcare support, education, training and activation measures are being discussed with the relevant Departments and Agencies.
While the formal consultation process on the Government discussion paper has concluded, my officials continue to be in regular contact with lone parents' representative groups, whose views continue to feed in to the shaping and structuring of the proposals.
Once I am satisfied that we have reached conclusions that are equitable, with a fully workable implementation strategy, it is my intention to bring forward proposals for consideration by the Government in the New Year.
12 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his view on the findings of the recent EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions especially the revelation that 18.5% of persons were at risk of poverty in 2005 meaning that they lived on or below the poverty threshold which was as little as €192.74. [43242/06]
49 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on whether the Government will deliver on the pledge in its Programme for Government to reduce the level of consistent poverty to 2%, in view of the fact that the latest figures show 7% were ranked as living in poverty. [43250/06]
57 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the recent UN Development Programme Human Development Report for 2006, published on 9 November 2006, particularly the finding that Ireland ranks seventeenth out of 18 rich countries for poverty levels; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43120/06]
73 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the accuracy of recent figures produced by the Central Statistics Office showing 7% of the population currently in consistent poverty and 18.5% at risk of poverty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43117/06]
105 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will confirm that there was a meeting between his Department and officials from the Central Statistics Office at which his Department was told that the level of consistent policy is approaching a floor and that it is unlikely to be lowered significantly further; if his Department was further advised that it was unlikely that the Government target for consistent poverty of 2% would be met without changes in Government policies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43116/06]
113 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the basis in which he believes the UN poverty index is misleading; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43121/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 12, 49, 57, 73, 105 and 113 together.
The annual EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU–SILC), which commenced in Ireland in 2003, is conducted by the Central Statistics Office (CSO) and provides information on poverty, deprivation and social exclusion. The most recent results, for the year 2005, record continuing positive trends in relation to poverty and social exclusion, and show the impact being made by the greatly increased resources now devoted to social welfare and other social services. For example, the survey revealed that there has been a significant decrease in consistent poverty rates for lone parent households from 31.1 per cent to 27.2 per cent, a drop in consistent poverty levels for people with disabilities from 21.7 per cent to 17.4 per cent, and a substantial drop in the number of older people at risk of poverty from 27.1 per cent in 2004 to 20.1 per cent in 2005. Also reflected in the findings is the impact of employment in ensuring that people achieve a good standard of living, with only 1.7 per cent of people at work experiencing consistent poverty.
These latest survey results show that the overall rate of consistent poverty in 2005, at 7 per cent, has remained relatively unchanged from the rate in 2004. However, because of methodological differences between the EU-SILC survey and the earlier Living in Ireland Survey (LIIS), used when setting the original NAPS target of 2 per cent consistent poverty, it will not be possible to conclude with certainty whether this target will have been reached by 2007.
It is considered unlikely, however, that the actual situation regarding consistent poverty would have deteriorated during the years covered by the new EU-SILC survey, as there were no policy changes that would have brought about a reversal of the earlier downward trend in consistent poverty recorded under the LIIS survey. On the contrary, significant improvements in social welfare rates and in services have been made during this time and the EU-SILC results since 2003 would suggest that the downward trend that was apparent in the LIIS has continued. The low levels of unemployment, and the substantial resources devoted to social welfare and other social services which have been increasing in real terms since 1997 are bringing about this downward trend. In recent years 250,000 people, including 100,000 children, have been lifted out of deprivation and hardship since 1997 as a result of concentrated and targeted measures and supports.
The meeting referred to was an informal technical briefing given by officials from the Central Statistics Office to public sector policy analysts from a number of relevant Departments at the time of the launch on 16 November of the latest results from EU-SILC. I am advised that, at the briefing, the CSO outlined the main results from the survey and provided responses to queries on particular aspects of the results. In relation to the consistent poverty measure, the CSO advised that the understanding of the deprivation questions by respondents to the survey, and their resultant pattern of response, must be taken into account in interpreting current and likely future movements in the measure as monitored by the EU SILC. In particular, the CSO officials drew attention to the finding that, even at relatively high levels of income, some survey respondents reported basic deprivation to questions used to assess the possible existence of consistent poverty amongst those on low incomes. Accordingly, the CSO formed the view that, in the survey environment, it may be unrealistic to expect that those on the lowest incomes would report ‘zero' or ‘close to zero' deprivation levels. In other words it was suggested there may be survey related reasons to conclude that the consistent poverty measure, as currently constructed and measured, may not fall below a certain ‘floor' level.
The issue of selecting the most appropriate poverty reduction measures and targets is currently being considered in the context of formulation of the next National Action Plan for social inclusion (NAPinclusion), which I will launch early in the New Year. This consideration will of course be informed by the EU-SILC survey results and by the subsequent analysis of these results by the CSO, which I have referred to. My main aim is to come up with an agreed measure which will help to give a clear, realistic and objective picture of progress being made to tackle poverty and social exclusion and of the effectiveness of Government policies in this regard.
I have previously expressed my concerns regarding the methodology employed by the UN when creating its Human Poverty Index, one of the measures contained in the UN Human Development Report. The latest report ranks Ireland 17th out of 18 high-income OECD countries on the Human Poverty Index, one of the key determinants of which is the ‘at risk of poverty' measure. The finding is simply not credible. While the latest EU-SILC results do show that our ‘at risk of poverty' rates are falling, I continue to believe that this measure gives a misleading impression of poverty as ‘at risk of poverty' levels are affected by increases in incomes generally. During periods of high economic growth increases in household income can outstrip even substantial increases in the incomes of households with relatively low earnings or on social welfare. This is precisely what happened in Ireland in recent years where increases in household incomes were substantially higher than increases both in individual earnings and social welfare incomes over this period, despite virtually unprecedented improvements in employment and social provision across the board
Furthermore, a recent analysis in the prominent journal "Development and Transition", published by the UN Development Programme and the London School of Economics and Political Science, insisted that relative poverty indicators cannot be used for international comparisons unless countries are similar in their level of economic development. Overall, it concluded that reliance on the ‘at risk of poverty' indicator causes a number of problems. It distorts the reality of Ireland's exceptional economic performance over several years and the significant progress that has been consequentially possible in confronting and tackling poverty.
While different reports can cause confusion, we have undoubtedly made real progress in reducing poverty levels and in promoting social inclusion. However, there are still unacceptable levels of hardship and deprivation among the most vulnerable groups in the population. The priority of Government for the next NAPinclusion will be on providing targeted supports and services so that ultimately we can eradicate poverty from society. The recent Budget 2007 package, containing the largest ever figure for social welfare expenditure of €15.3 billion, is clear evidence of our commitment in this regard.
13 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has considered using the same assessment of capital for farm assist as is used for the State non-contributory pension; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43266/06]
The weekly value of capital is assessed in a similar manner for both state pension (non-contributory) and farm assist. For both schemes, an initial sum of €20,000 is disregarded and the balance is assessed as means. I understand that the Deputy is referring, in particular, to the difference in the assessment of means generally, including capital, for these schemes in the case of couples.
In the case of state pension (non-contributory), the current arrangements provide that the means of the claimant shall be taken to be one half of the total means of the couple. Where means are in excess of €20.00 per week (€30 per week from January next), reduced rates of both the personal payment and the increase for a qualified adult are payable.
In the case of farm assist, the means of a couple are halved where the spouse has earnings from insurable employment and/or where the spouse/partner's means from any source is greater than €76.18 per week. Increases for qualified adults continue to be payable at the full rate where the spouse/partner's income is less than €100 per week and at reduced rates where that income is between €100 per week and €250 per week (€280 per week from January). These provisions are similar to those which apply in the case of other working age schemes such as jobseeker's allowance and disability allowance.
Any change in the method of assessment of capital for farm assist could only be considered in the context of the assessment of means generally for this scheme and associated schemes and there are no plans, at present, to change the current arrangements. However, the matter will be kept under review.
14 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the cross Departmental co-operation between his Department and the Department of Health and Children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43288/06]
My Department works in close co-operation with other Government departments and their agencies in carrying out its responsibilities in the provision of income support and other services. This co-operation includes participation in working committees and groups, collaborative working on a bilateral basis in pursuit of specific Government policy objectives and liaison on day to day matters which arise in the administration of my Department's services.
There are several formal arrangements in place with the Department of Health and Children in relation to major Government initiatives and in line with commitments in my Department's Statement of Strategy 2005- 2007, in its Disability Sectoral Plan and in the social partnership agreement Towards 2016.
My Department participates in a number of groups, chaired by the Department of Health and Children, that are examining disability issues. These include, the Costs of Disability Group and the National Co-ordinating Committee for Training and Work for People with Disabilities. A Protocol agreed between the two Departments identifies the key shared objectives to be achieved by both in relation to people with disabilities. Progress is monitored by regular bi-lateral meetings.
There is close and ongoing co-operation between my Department and the Department of Health in implementing the recommendation made in the Core Functions of the Health Service Report. This will involve inter alia the transfer of certain functions including the supplementary welfare allowance scheme (SWA), and other cost of disability and caring payments, from Health Service Executive (HSE) to my Department.
A number of working groups which include senior officials from my Department and the Department of Health & Children and the HSE have been set up to progress the transfer arrangements. The work is overseen by an interdepartmental steering group chaired by my Department.
The SWA scheme is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare Service of the HSE. Officials of my Department works directly with the Health Service Executive in relation to the administration of the SWA scheme.
My Department supports the Department of Health and Children in progressing the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland and participates in the steering Group which is overseeing the study, the Project Team which is managing it, and in the Scientific and Policy Advisory Group.
Furthermore, officials participate in a number of committees and working groups established by the Office of the Minister for Children to progress the National Children's Strategy.
Both Departments worked together with the Department of Finance and the Department of an Taoiseach in relation to the issue on Long Term Care which is being considered by the Government at present. Further co-operation is planned in relation to the National Carers Strategy to be developed by my Department in line with the Government's commitments in Towards 2016.
The Office for Social Inclusion (OSI) works closely with the Social Inclusion Unit in the Department of Health and Children on the development of the Government's National Action Plan for Social Inclusion. My Department is fully committed to ongoing co-operation with other Government Departments and agencies in the development of my Department's services and to achieve Government objectives. Our overall aim is to ensure that people will have sufficient income and opportunity to participate in the social and economic life of the country and quality integrated public services to enhance their quality of life and well-being.
16 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the extent to which he has considered the possibility of offering insurance contribution credits to women working in the home; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43197/06]
278 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of recipients from the homemakers scheme who would not have qualified in their own right; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43383/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 16 and 278 together.
The social welfare pension rights of those who take time out of the workforce for caring duties are protected by the homemaker's scheme which was introduced from 1994. The scheme allows up to 20 years (from 1994) spent caring for children or incapacitated adults to be disregarded when a person's social insurance record is being averaged for pension purposes.
The scheme will not of itself qualify a person for a pension. The standard qualifying conditions, which require a person to enter insurance 10 years before pension age, pay a minimum of 260 contributions at the appropriate rate and achieve a yearly average of at least 10 contributions from the time they enter insurance until they reach pension age must also be satisfied.
The homemaker's scheme is not yet a significant factor in determining eligibility for social welfare pensions, with relatively few cases involving recourse to the scheme having been decided.
The question of changing the system of disregards to one based on actual credited contributions has been suggested and this will be examined in the context of future developments in pensions policy.
18 Ms B. Moynihan-Cronin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the action he will take arising from the opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice regarding the decision of his Department to extend the payment delivery services contract with An Post; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43141/06]
Following the Government decision in 1999 to extend the An Post contract for the delivery of social welfare payments for a further 3 years a complaint was lodged with the European Commission under the Procurement Services Directive.
The Advocate-General to the European Court of Justice gave an opinion on the case in September 2006 and concurred with the European Commission's view that Ireland breached EU non-discrimination rules by not publicly advertising the payment delivery service. It is expected that the Court will give its judgement within six months of receiving the Advocate General's opinion. I should point out that although the opinion is usually indicative of the courts decision, the court may choose to take a different view.
In the meantime discussions are on-going with the Office of the Attorney General on the legal implications for my Department and on the steps to be taken should the judgement of the Court be in line with the Advocate-General's opinion.
I will be putting appropriate proposals before Government once the court decision is known. My Department will also engage with the Commission in relation to giving effect to the Court's judgment.
Pending any new arrangements being put in place, and recognizing the essential payment delivery service which An Post currently provides for my Department, the Company will continue to provide these services.
19 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects the publication of the national action plan against poverty and social exclusion 2006 to 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43245/06]
63 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he plans to publish the promised new two year social inclusion action plan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43128/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 19 and 63 together.
In line with a commitment in the social partnership agreement ‘Towards 2016', a new National Action Plan for Social Inclusion (NAP inclusion 2007-2016) is currently being prepared by the Office for Social Inclusion in my Department. The Plan will be launched early in 2007 and is being prepared in tandem with and will complement the forthcoming National Development Plan 2007-2013, which will contain a specific chapter on social inclusion. In keeping with the approach taken in the original 1997 National Anti-Poverty Strategy the new plan will adopt a strategic approach reflecting the complex nature of poverty and social exclusion, which is multi-faceted in its causes and effects and, as a consequence, requires a multi-pronged response across a range of policy areas.
These strategies will build on the lifecycle approach in ‘Towards 2016', by assessing the risks which individuals face at each stage of the lifecycle and the supports they need to meet these risks. The groups focussed on using this lifecycle approach are Children, People of Working Age, Older People and People with Disabilities. This strategic framework is also being designed to create more coherent and integrated structures to achieve more effective implementation. It will also facilitate better and more effective reporting and monitoring across the spectrum of government activity in the area of poverty and social inclusion.
The ten-year timescale chosen for the new plan both complements that of Towards 2016 and recognises that policy responses to poverty and social exclusion often require time to achieve their full results. The plan, however, will be reviewed at regular intervals, with the first review taking place in 2008.
In the ten years since the first NAPS, much has been achieved in Ireland towards the EU aim of making a decisive impact on poverty. Much has also been learned, both from our own experience in Ireland and from that of other Member States, on how more effective, coordinated implementation of strategies can be achieved. Full account will be taken of this learning in developing the new Action Plan and the arrangements for its implementation.
My aim and that of the Government is to continue to build not just a prosperous but a fair and equitable society in Ireland, which values and supports its people and particularly its most vulnerable. I am determined to ensure that this Plan and its implementation, in full consultation with all the stakeholders at national, regional and local levels, will make a major contribution to building the type of society we aspire to, by making a truly decisive impact on poverty.
20 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has considered allowing parents of disabled children, issued with a companion pass, to make round trips with the return or outgoing journey being without the travel pass holder; the estimated cost of same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43269/06]
56 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress on removing the remaining travel restrictions on free travel pass holders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43268/06]
71 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress made in discussions with the EU Commission regarding the possibility of providing free travel passes to Irish pensioners resident abroad; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43140/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 20, 56 and 71 together.
The free travel scheme is available to all people living in the State aged 66 years or over. All carers in receipt of carer's allowance and carers of people in receipt of constant attendance or prescribed relative's allowance, regardless of their age, receive a free travel pass.
It is also available to people under age 66 who are in receipt of certain disability type welfare payments, such as disability allowance, invalidity pension and blind person's pension. People resident in the State who are in receipt of a social security invalidity or disability payment from a country covered by EU Regulations, or from a country with which Ireland has a bilateral social security agreement, and who have been in receipt of this payment for at least 12 months, are also eligible for free travel.
The scheme provides free travel on the main public and private transport services for those eligible under the scheme. These services are provided by companies such as Bus Átha Cliath, Bus Éireann and Iarnród Éireann, as well as Luas and services provided by over 80 private transport operators.
The free travel scheme applies to travel within the State and point to point cross- border journeys between here and Northern Ireland. In line with the Government objective to put in place an all Ireland free travel scheme for pensioners resident in all parts of this island, I am pleased that early 2007 will see the start of the introduction of all Ireland Free Travel which will allow Irish pensioners to travel throughout Northern Ireland free of charge while Northern pensioners will be able to do likewise here.
There have been a number of requests and enquiries in relation to the extension of entitlement to free travel in Ireland to Irish born people living outside Ireland, or to those in receipt of pensions from my Department, particularly in the UK, when they return to Ireland for a visit.
I have been advised that it would not be possible to extend entitlement to free travel only to Irish born people living abroad as to do so would be contrary to European legislation which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of nationality. In addition, legal advice also indicates that to extend the free travel scheme to people in receipt of Irish pensions who live outside the State would also be discriminatory under EU law.
However, I am determined to explore all options and I have raised the issue in meetings with the Commissioner for Employment and Social Affairs, and officials from my Department met with European Commission officials on a number of occasions in an effort to clarify the legal issues involved. I am keeping this issue under close review and contacts with the European Commission are ongoing.
All peak time access restrictions associated with the free travel scheme were removed with effect from 25th September 2006. The lifting of all travel restrictions at peak times benefits many people, particularly older people and those with disabilities, who are now able to travel in the main cities, and surrounding areas, on public transport services at times that best suit their needs. The ending of these restrictions removed the need for people to apply for special passes to travel during what were restricted times.
The free travel companion pass entitles the pass holder to have any one person, aged 16 years or over, to accompany him/her free of charge when travelling. Such companion passes are available to persons who qualify for free travel and who, on account of their disability, are unable to travel alone. Those eligible for a companion pass include people who are receiving full time care and attention from someone who is in receipt of a carer's allowance.
Under existing arrangements, since 1998 customers aged 75 years or over who advise the Department that they are medically unfit to travel alone receive a companion free travel pass. At present those who are aged between 66 and 74 who are medically assessed as unfit to travel alone are not entitled to a companion pass unless they had been in receipt of a disability type payment prior to reaching age 66. In the recent Budget, I announced the removal of this requirement. From March 2007 all those aged over 66 will be eligible for a companion pass if they are certified as being medically unfit to travel alone.
The main objective of the free travel scheme is to encourage older people and people with disabilities to remain independent and active in the community, thereby reducing the need for institutional care. The purpose of allowing pass holders to be accompanied while travelling is to further facilitate this mobility. Extension of the companion pass in the manner proposed would not be in keeping with this objective.
22 Mr. Noonan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of children for whom the child dependent allowance is being granted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43299/06]
37 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if it is his intention to introduce a second tier child income support payment once the NESC proposals have been finalised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43271/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 22 and 37 together.
In the context of the partnership agreement ‘Sustaining Progress', the National Economic and Social Council was asked to examine the feasibility of merging the family income supplement and child dependant allowance into a second tier child income support. Such a payment would be aimed specifically at targeting child poverty by channelling resources to low-income families without creating significant disincentives to employment.
NESC has indicated that, as the proposed second tier income support represents a new approach to targeting, the issues involved are complex and there are technical and policy challenges to be overcome. The Council's analysis of these issues will, I believe, be of significant assistance in informing the future direction of child income support policy.
In advance of NESC the examination of the new second tier support to be finalised, a range of other reforms, increased welfare supports and expanded child-centred services are all combining to make significant progress in tackling child poverty. The most recent figures show that at least 100,000 children have been lifted out of deprivation and hardship inside the last decade as a result of targeted measures and supports. These include, in addition to the substantial increases in each Budget in child benefit rates in recent years which directly benefit over one million children, increases in Budget 2007 of from €9 to €111 a week for families on Family Income Supplement which is being claimed by over 21,100 families, increasing the average payment, per child, to €50 per week; the €60 per child increase in the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance which benefits some 85,000 families and the €1,000 a year Early Childcare Supplement which benefits over 396,000 children, a third of whom are the children of lone parents.
Also, the increase in all three child dependant allowance rates to €22 from January 2007 will benefit 342,000 children at a cost of €56.13 million in a full year.
24 Mr. English asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans to improve the family support programmes and measures on offer by his Department and other agencies under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43273/06]
My Department provides for a range of family support programmes and services, via the Family Services Project and the Family Support Agency, through a range of groups and organisations that are involved in the provision of supports and information to parents and families.
Specifically, the Family Support Agency has responsibility for a number of key programmes including the Family and Community Services Resource Centre (FRC) Programme, the scheme of grants to voluntary organisations providing marriage, child and bereavement counselling and the Family Mediation Service.
The emphasis in the Family Resource Centres is on the involvement of local communities in developing approaches to tackle the problems they face and on creating successful partnerships between the voluntary and statutory agencies in the areas concerned. Government commitment to this key sector has been underscored by the allocation of an increase of almost €5million to the FRC programme in 2007, to facilitate its consolidation and expansion, bringing total funding, including an increase announced in the budget, to some €18.75 million.
The scheme of grants to the family counselling sector is another key family support administered by the Family Support Agency. During 2006, financial support was provided to over 540 groups nationwide. 2007 funding will increase to €10 million, including a recent budget increase to allow for an increase in grant payments to those organisations that apply for funding and for an anticipated increase in the number of groups applying for support.
Overall, the budget of the Family Support Agency will increase to over €35.3 million up from €28 million in 2006 and a massive €10.8 million increase since 2005 to continue with its mission to promote family and community well being through the provision of appropriate supports and services to families.
My Department is also responsible for the Family Services Project (FSP) which was established to provide a high quality information service on the range of supports available to families and to provide programmes of support to groups of customers with complex needs for example lone parents, dependent spouses on social welfare payments with children, carers and Traveller families.
Examples of activities funded under the FSP, now administered by the Employment Supports Service in my Department, include parenting projects for very young lone parents, support programmes for families of people with disabilities and family support for Travellers. To date in 2006, over €1.40 million has been expended on some 82 programmes to assist disadvantaged families, 37 of which were parenting programmes. The project is monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure that the funding is targeted at those families most in need of assistance.
25 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will support the introduction of a direct link between eligibility for rent allowance and landlord registration with the Private Residential Tenancies Board; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42555/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which is administered on my behalf by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive, provides for the payment of a rent supplement to assist eligible people who are unable to provide for their immediate accommodation needs from their own resources and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source.
Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004, landlords are legally obliged to register tenancies with the Private Residential Tenancies Board (PRTB) in most cases. My Department is committed to working closely with the PRTB in ensuring that over time, all tenancies where rent supplement is paid comply with the statutory system of tenancy regulation and safeguards. To that end, my Department provides details of rent supplement payments to the PRTB to enable them identify tenancies that are not registered and to take any follow-up action necessary.
It is not a requirement of the rent supplement scheme that landlords must be registered with the PRTB before a rent supplement is paid to the tenant. To make this a requirement would delay or in some cases entirely prevent payments of rent supplement to the tenants. In many cases, when a rent supplement claim is being decided the tenancy will not have been registered with the PRTB as the establishment of the tenancy will be dependent on rent supplement being awarded. I do not wish to penalise tenants for the failure of individual landlords to meet their statutory obligations. In that regard, I am satisfied that the arrangements I have outlined above are currently appropriate.
26 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding the proposed move of the Community Welfare Service to his Department, and when this will take place. [43255/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme (SWA) is administered by some 700 Community Welfare Officers and 59 Superintendent Community Welfare Officers (SCWOs) and supporting clerical staff, working within the Community Welfare Service of the Health Service Executive.
The transfer of the Community Welfare Service to my Department arises from the Government decision earlier this year to implement the recommendations made by the Commission on "Financial Management and Control System in the Health Service".
Following on from the Government decision, a number of implementation working groups were established. One of these groups oversees the implementation of the SWA element of the transfer of functions programme. The group's work to date has centred mainly on providing the necessary foundation for the successful transfer of the scheme. This includes identifying all of the functions at present carried out within the Community Welfare Service for the purpose of identifying appropriate arrangements for the continued administration and management of functions in the context of the transfer.
The transfer of functions will present fundamental reform and developmental opportunities for an integrated and enhanced income support system, including a restructuring and integration of support services within my Department, while facilitating the HSE in concentrating on its core health and personal social services functions. The existing mechanisms of delivery by the Community Welfare Service allow the service to be responsive, flexible and outcome focused. These are attributes for which there will be a continuing need into the future and there will be no diminution in the existing role and responsibilities afforded to SCWO/CWO's. The transfer of functions is an opportunity for an enhancement of the support role that Community Welfare Officers currently provide to those disadvantaged in society.
The implementation of a change programme of this magnitude involves organisational, human resource and service delivery issues. Throughout the change programme both the HSE and my Department will give a very high priority to involving the Community Welfare Service in the planning and implementation of the changes and providing clear and precise information on all elements of the change process. Staff in my own Department who will be impacted by the change will also be involved and kept informed throughout the process.
While no date has been set for the completion of the transfer process, I propose to bring forward enabling legislation to give effect to the transfer in time for the 2007 Social Welfare Bill and I would intend that the transfer would take place as soon as possible thereafter.
During the period of transition my Department will continue to give a high priority to supporting the delivery of the very high standard of service currently provided by staff in the Community Welfare Service.
27 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his proposals for a review of the rent supplement scheme, particularly in view of criticism from the Comptroller and Auditor General of the cost of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43131/06]
46 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the review of the supplementary welfare allowance scheme carried out under the Government’s expenditure review initiative; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43118/06]
85 Mr. Sherlock asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress made to date with regard to consideration by his Department of a new mortgage support plan; when he expects the consultation period to be complete; if the scheme will be directed specifically towards persons currently priced out of the property market; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43130/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 27, 46 and 85 together.
The review of the supplementary welfare allowance (SWA) scheme was carried out as part of the Government's Expenditure Review Initiative series of Programme Evaluation reviews. Given the extensive and complex nature of the scheme, the review was undertaken in two phases. A report was published at the end of the first phase in December 2004. That report gave a broad appraisal of the scheme and identified issues for particular consideration in the second phase which commenced in February 2005.
This second phase of the Review, recently published, on 29th November, considered the issues raised in Phase I of the report and examined the validity of the objectives and the efficiency and effectiveness of all elements of the scheme, including rent supplement. The review also provided a series of recommendations in relation to the future of the scheme.
Overall the review concluded that the scheme has, over the years, met its objective of guaranteeing that every person in the State has a minimum level of income sufficient to meet their basic day to day needs. The main recommendations arising include –
That ultimately, social assistance schemes should be integrated into a unified system of income support;
That payment of basic SWA payments should be part of the Department's (DSFA) remit;
That all matters relating to long-term housing needs should be dealt with by local authorities;
That short-term income support for housing needs should be catered for by DSFA;
that exceptional/urgent needs payments should be rationalised;
that the remaining elements of SWA should become part of a system which would deliver irradiate, flexible circumstances. This service would be decided by the Community Welfare Service in co-operation with the other relevant agencies.
In relation to mortgage supports study has been commissioned from Goodbody Economic Consultants to examine the potential of supplementing home ownership specifically among the client base that comes within the rent supplementation arrangements. The study is aimed at identifying possible viable alternative approaches to meet the housing needs of long-term rent supplement recipients. People in this category are primarily dependent on social welfare or health service executive payments and would not be in position generally to purchase private property at going market rates. The work is nearing completion and I understand that the draft report is currently being finalised.
The Value for Money examination undertaken by the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) looked specifically at the rent supplement scheme during the period 2000 to 2005. One of the main issues raised by the C&AG relates to the substantial increase in expenditure on rent supplement over the period of review. As the report notes, it increased from €151m in 2000 to almost €370m in 2005. In the same period, recipient numbers rose from 42,700 to just over 60,000. The report focuses in particular on the increase in the level of rent supplements paid during this period as a contributory factor giving rise to the increase in expenditure. Other contributing factors include increases in the number of recipients and changes in household composition.
During the period under review my Department took measures to address increases in expenditure. For example in December 2002 limits were set by regulation on the amount of rent in respect of which rent supplements are paid. Rent supplement are not paid where rents exceed the maximum levels set other than in exceptional circumstances. The limits were again reviewed in December 2003 and June 2005 and a further review is due to be completed by the end of this month.
A conclusion arising from the C&AG report, is that rent supplementation under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme has, over the years, developed beyond the original objective of providing short-term assistance with accommodation. A significant number of people have now come to rely on rent supplementation for extended periods, including people on local authority housing lists. For this reason, the scheme has to be viewed in the context of overall housing policy, particularly in the case of long-term claimants.
In response to this situation, the Government has introduced new rental assistance arrangements including the rental accommodation scheme (RAS) giving local authorities specific responsibility for meeting the longer-term housing needs of people receiving rent supplement for 18 months or more, on a phased implementation basis. When fully operational, local authorities will meet the housing needs of these individuals through a range of approaches including the traditional range of social housing options, the voluntary housing sector and, in particular, a new public / private partnership type rental accommodation scheme.
The Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government has indicated that at the end of November 2006 almost 2,600 tenants have been accommodated under the Rental Accommodation Scheme and a further 1,900 persons accommodated in Social Housing. It is projected that by the end of 2006, between 4,500 and 5,000 tenants will have transferred from rent supplement to accommodation provided by local authorities either through the RAS or some other type of social housing, rising to 10,000 by the end of 2007.
These rental assistance arrangements were endorsed by the working group which carried out the review of the SWA scheme. Overall I am satisfied that the current approach in relation to those in receipt of rent supplement with a long-term housing need is the correct one and that my Department will be vigorously pursuing the implementation of the new arrangements.
28 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people being refused unemployment assistance or benefit on the grounds that they are not genuinely seeking work, despite producing letters from employers to the contrary on a county basis, per month, for each of the past twelve months; the reason these letters are not accepted as proof that they are genuinely seeking work; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43287/06]
To qualify for a jobseeker's payment a person must be available for and genuinely seeking work. Reviews of recipients' efforts to find work are carried out regularly by local offices. The onus is on the customer to show that he or she satisfies this condition by providing clear and convincing evidence that he or she has made an active search for work on an on-going basis. Statistics of people refused jobseekers benefit and jobseekers allowance are set out on a county and month basis in table 1 and table 2 attached. However, statistics are not maintained of the number of customers disallowed for not genuinely seeking work, who had supplied letters from prospective employers.
It should be borne in mind that there are many other reasons why a deciding officer may disallow a claim under this heading, including failure to avail of training and developmental opportunities to improve ones chances of securing employment.
The production of letters from employers is only one of a number of factors taken into account by a deciding officer when considering whether a person is genuinely seeking work. There are a number of reasons why employers' letters may not be accepted as evidence that a person is genuinely seeking work, and such letters are not in themselves conclusive evidence of work seeking. Other issues taken into consideration include the number of suitable employment vacancies known to exist in the area and previous experience of being unable to obtain evidence over a long period of time from the customer of having looked for work.
All measures taken by a customer to secure employment will be taken into account provided they offer a reasonable chance of getting employment. The steps expected to be taken to find work will vary from person to person and from one period to another. In determining what are reasonable steps, the deciding officer considers the nature and conditions of the employment sought and the individual circumstances of the persons concerned, including their level of skills and/or qualifications for the employment in question having regard to the labour market opportunities and seasonal factors.
A person who fails to satisfy the deciding officer that he or she is genuinely seeking work is not entitled to a jobseeker's payment. Where a person is dissatisfied with a decision made by a deciding officer he or she may appeal this decision to the Social Welfare Appeals Office.
29 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the way he will improve the supervision of occupational pension schemes by the Pensions Board and by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43275/06]
272 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the way he will improve the supervision of occupational pension schemes by the Pensions Board and by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43569/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 29 and 272 together.
Under the Pensions Act, 1990, trustees have the main responsibility for the administration of funded occupational pension schemes and for compliance with the requirements that apply to these schemes. The Pensions Board has the main statutory responsibility for monitoring compliance with the Pensions Act and is also required under the Act to provide guidance for trustees on their duties and responsibilities in relation to scheme administration and to issue codes of practice on specific aspects of trustees' duties.
The provision made for these Pensions Board functions is a clear recognition of the central role which trustees have in ensuring that occupational pension schemes are properly administered, that scheme members' pension rights are fully safeguarded and that they and their dependants ultimately receive their pensions.
The Pensions Board, as part of its regulatory role, monitors trustees who must account to members for how their scheme is run by providing them with a wide range of personal and scheme information as required by the Pensions Acts 1990 to 2004.
The disclosure of information in a timely manner enables scheme members to monitor their benefits and the financial soundness of their pension schemes.
The Board regards information disclosure as a very important governance requirement for pension schemes and takes steps to enforce this obligation where necessary. In this regard trustees have been prosecuted for failing to comply with disclosure requirements.
There are also statutory provisions which place a legal requirement on a range of specified persons involved in the operation of occupational pension schemes to report suspected fraud or material misappropriation to the Board. There is also provision to make a voluntary report on any matter concerning the state and conduct of the scheme. Specified persons include auditors, actuaries, trustees, insurance intermediaries, investment advisers and any other person who has been involved in assisting the trustees of a scheme. The provisions also contain legal protection for the persons making such reports.
Obviously, it is necessary to keep the regulatory strategy under review to ensure that schemes are administered in accordance with the requirements of the Pensions Act and to an acceptably high standard. In this regard, the Pensions Board is at present carrying out a review of its operations to see how it might perform its role more effectively in the current pensions environment. Broadly, I understand that the Board plans to develop further its approach to the supervision of schemes and Personal Retirement Savings Accounts, in line with international best practise and EU requirements. I would support such an approach. The Board will shortly present its proposals in this regard to the Department and these will be considered in detail.
30 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will make a statement on the progress of Operation Gull aimed at curbing cross-border social welfare fraud; and if the operation has been concluded or if it is ongoing. [43138/06]
A Social Welfare Inspector was assigned to the Garda National Investigation Bureau, GNIB, in July 2004 to assist my Department and the Bureau in the investigation of social welfare fraud and breaches of the Immigration Acts, to provide information and intelligence and to promote the benefits of a multi-agency approach to immigration and employment law enforcement. A second inspector was assigned to the Bureau in August, 2006.
Operation Gull is a joint control exercise undertaken periodically at Airports and Ports in the Republic, Northern Ireland and Great Britain and the operations involve personnel from the GNIB, and the United Kingdom Immigration Service. My Department, through its assignment of Social Welfare Inspectors to the GNIB, participates in these exercises.
I am satisfied that assigning Social Welfare Inspectors to the GNIB has proved beneficial for both organisations and that Operation Gull is an example of the benefits of inter agency and international co-operation. The operation is ongoing and my Department will continue to support such operations in every possible way.
31 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the results of the research carried out by the Vincentian Partnership for Social Justice which suggested that most households on social welfare do not have enough to sustain a basic standard of living; his views on the findings of this research; the steps he will take to deal with this situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43115/06]
I welcome the launch, late last month, of the latest research report of the Vincentian Partnership for Social Justice, titled " Minimum Essential Budgets for Six Households". My Department will examine the research report and its recommendations over the next period in the context of setting future policy direction.
It is clear that Government has already acted, in 2006, to address some of the problems and challenges identified in this report, and in other similar studies. Such actions include:
The introduction of the early childcare supplement (introduced after the research for this project was conducted);
The introduction of new National Childcare Investment Programme;
Changes in the upper earnings limit for one-parent family payment;
Major proposals for lone parents, designed to remove them from poverty and to enable them to (re)join the workforce.
This Government is committed to significantly improving the standard of living of welfare dependent and low-income households and to making a decisive impact on poverty and social exclusion. Over the period since 1997, the Government has greatly increased the levels of income support provided through the social welfare system and this was again evident in the increases announced last week as part of Budget 2007. Expenditure on social welfare has increased by nearly 270% since 1997. In 2007 almost €15.5 billion is being allocated to social welfare compared to €5.7 billion in 1997.
Budget 2007 has provided over €1.4 billion, the largest social welfare package ever in the history of the State. This is more than five times the amount allocated to social welfare in the 1997 Budget. Almost one third of all current Government expenditure is being provided for social welfare in 2007 to directly support and benefit one and a half million people.
Just to list some specifics. In Budget 2007:
We have delivered on our commitment in the Programme for Government by bringing the basic State Pension to €200 a week.
The contributory pension has increased by €16 a week to €209.30 and other social welfare rates by €20 a week to €185.80.
About 35,500 contributory pensioner couples will be nearly €40 a week better off.
We have realised the 2007 target for the lowest social welfare rates. The lowest rate of Social Welfare payments have increased by 12.1%, far in excess of the expected increase of 4.5% in private sector earnings and almost three times the forecast rate of inflation for 2007.
Since 1997, the lowest rates of welfare payments have increased by almost 117%, well ahead of the 53% accumulated inflation over that period.
We are also delivering on the pledge to tackle remaining levels of child poverty. A number of key measures are, in particular, shaped and targeted at confronting and tackling remaining child poverty, including
an increase of €10 in Child Benefit to over one million children that takes this universal support to at least €160 per month.
combining the three rates of Child Dependant Allowance payments into a single rate of €22 per week that will benefit over 340,000 children of families on welfare.
Increasing the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance by 50%.
In recent years, we have lifted more than 100,000 children out of poverty. The measures I have outlined will pay a major part in completing this task.
We are confronting the issue of fuel poverty. Last year, I increased the fuel allowance by €5 a week to €14 and this year I am again increasing it by a further €4 to €18 a week. This means that the level of the fuel allowance, which is paid to 274,000 recipients, will have doubled in the last two years. As I already announced in September last, as and from next January, the number of free units of electricity and gas paid under the Household Benefits Scheme will increase by 600 units a year to 2,400 units.
In Budget 2007, I also announced a wide-ranging employment support package of €21 million. This contained a range of measures which will alleviate poverty and support activation by improving income disregards and tapers for the unemployed and qualified adults. These arrangements maximise the benefits of work for low-income households.
The full package of measures I announced for carers will cost in excess of €107 million in a full year and are further evidence, if such was needed, of this Government's commitment to improving the lot of family carers and the people they look after.
Key reforms included increases in the income disregards for entitlement to Carer's Allowance and a 25% increase in the Respite Care Grant, to €1,500 per week.
I was also delighted to announce that I am introducing fundamental structural reforms in relation to carers. In future people in receipt of another social welfare payment, who are also providing full time care and attention to a person, will be able to retain their main welfare payment and receive another payment, equivalent to a half rate Carer's Allowance. The precise details of this arrangement are currently being examined by my Department and will be set out in legislation next year.
In conclusion, the 2007 Budget package is a strong statement of this Government's commitment to the elderly, children, carers and all those who, for one reason or another, are more vulnerable in our society.
32 Mr. Kelly asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the effect on persons in residential institutions resulting from the payment of full disability allowance; the number who will qualify; the way the payments will be handled by institutions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43159/06]
62 Mr. Curran asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the effect on persons in institutions resulting from the payment of full disability allowance; the numbers eligible; the way these payments will be treated by institutions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43152/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 32 and 62 together.
The improvements made to the Disability Allowance (DA) scheme since its transfer from the Health Boards in 1996 mean that many of those who had previously been disqualified for payment under the DPMA scheme because they were in residential care are now entitled to payment under the (DA) scheme. Furthermore, people who are living in community-based residences are eligible to receive (DA) provided the relevant Health Board is not providing funding towards their maintenance.
However, the position of people in residential care since prior to August 1999, or those who entered residential care subsequent to that date without an entitlement to (DA), has been that they are disqualified from receipt of this payment solely because of their residency.
This situation was partially addressed in Budget 2005 when I introduced a new Disability Allowance (Personal Expenses Rate) to 2,700 people in residential care who qualified for this payment.
This payment replaced the pocket money (spending allowances) which had previously been paid to some of these residents by the Health Services Executive but at the standardised and higher rate of €35 per week. The weekly levels of the pocket money allowance had varied between Health Service Executive areas.
I have now moved beyond simply standardising the current personal allowances to make these people eligible for full (DA) at the rate of €185.80 per week as a matter of right, subject only to the same conditions as apply to others. As part of Budget 2007, the disqualification has been removed so that all persons in residential care will have an income maintenance payment on the same basis (in effect abolishing the disqualification and the Disability Allowance (Personal Expenses Rate)). The removal of the disqualification will ensure that persons in receipt of DA in residential care are treated in the same way as other social welfare recipients.
Arrangements are now being made to extend the payment of (DA), at the rate appropriate to their means, to approximately 2,700 people in residential care. This measure will be effective from 3 January 2007 and payments will be made in accordance with the joint level service agreements in place between my Department and the service providers. The payments to the people concerned will be treated in the same way as other Disability Allowance payments and in line with the protocols of the Health Services Executive for monies paid by my Department on behalf of persons in residential care.
33 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has been involved in discussions with other Government Departments or State agencies regarding the possible introduction of a national waiver scheme on waste charges for those on low incomes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43296/06]
282 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will introduce a national waiver scheme for refuse services, in conjunction with the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government specifically targeted to help social welfare recipients and people on low incomes and those who have no option but to avail of refuse service from a private operator; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43465/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 33 and 282 together.
The setting of waste management charges and the introduction of waivers in respect of waste charges is, as stated by my colleague the Minister for Environment, Heritage and Local Government, a matter for each local authority.
The introduction of a national social welfare scheme to address the issue would be complex given the wide range of charging regimes and cost structures that exist in respect of waste management throughout the State. Charges vary across local authorities and within local authorities where there is more than one provider. In addition, some local authorities already operate waiver schemes.
My officials have discussed this issue with their counterparts in the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. While there are no plans at present for the introduction of a waiver scheme through the social welfare system, I intend to keep the issue under close scrutiny.
35 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if the introduction of the €100 income disregard has been successful in encouraging the labour market participation of non-contributory State pensioners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43260/06]
69 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has satisfied himself that all non-contributory State pensioners who are eligible, are availing of the €100 income disregard scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43259/06]
98 Mr. Kirk asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the impact he anticipates that the increased earnings disregard will have for non-contributory State pensioners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43162/06]
110 Mr. Carey asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the effect for non-contributory State pensioners of the increased earnings disregard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43151/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 35, 69, 98 and 110.
In the Budget of December 2005, I announced a wide range of important reforms for non-contributory pensioners in conjunction with the introduction of the State Pension (non- contributory). These reforms include improvements to the means test for pensioners, the raising of the weekly means disregard from €7.60 to €20. As part of the pension reforms, I also announced a specific additional disregard of €100 per week where the pensioner and/or spouse is in employment. This new disregard, relating to earnings from employment, is intended as an incentive to facilitate non-contributory pensioners who wish to continue working, or to re-enter the workforce.
The effect of this measure is that the first €100 of weekly earnings from employment is fully disregarded from the means test. A similar earnings disregard of €100 per week also applies to the pensioner's spouse or partner. The disregard also applies to people under age 66 who are in receipt of a widow/er's non-contributory pension, deserted wife's allowance and prisoner's wife's allowance.
The new disregard was effective from the 29th September 2006. In June 2006 all relevant non contributory pension customers in receipt of a reduced pension, some 48,000, were notified by my Department of the impending change to the employment disregard. As a result, I am satisfied that all customers who are in a position to avail of the disregard are fully informed of these changes.
The customers benefiting from the new €100 earnings disregard, currently numbering 380, are in addition to the approximately 500 pensioners who already avail of the 30 hours disregard from income earned as a home help with the HSE.
Further to my commitment on encouraging our State pensioners back into the workplace I announced in the Budget earlier this month that I would be doubling this disregard from €100 to €200 effective from January 2007. This specific rise in earnings disregard of €200 per week, equivalent to €10,400 a year will allow a State Pensioner the opportunity to earn additional income through employment while at the same time retaining their full pension entitlements.
Labour force participation by older people has been declining over recent years and I would expect that the doubling of the disregard should act as a further incentive to pensioners to return or remain in the workforce, thereby reversing the trend. It should also help address the concerns of pensioners about reductions in pensions and benefits, along with affording them the opportunity to increase their weekly income and standard of living.
The change to State Pension (Non-Contributory) employment disregard should not only be seen as society's recognition of the contribution our older people have made to the building of modern Ireland, but also sends out the message that we value the potential contribution to society these men and women can make. While it is not yet clear how successful this initiative will be in attracting labour market participation nonetheless early signs are encouraging and I am optimistic for future active age employment.
36 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the financial and other contributions of his Department in ensuring people on low incomes can afford healthy food; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43278/06]
My Department through its various social insurance and assistance schemes provides income supports to people to meet their basic living needs, including food, clothing, heat and light.
Supplements are also payable in certain circumstances for specific needs, for example fuel allowances, rent supplements, living alone allowance for older people or the household benefits package for pensioners, eligible disabled people and carers.
Where people on low incomes have particular medical conditions or dietary requirements, diet supplements are available through the supplementary welfare allowance scheme which is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. It is expected that expenditure on diet supplements will amount to €6 million this year and benefit over 11,000 people.
My Department also provides funding for school meals through two programmes, the urban school meals scheme and the local projects scheme. The urban school meals scheme operates in conjunction with certain local authorities and is co-funded by my Department. The local projects scheme provides funding to secondary, national, pre-schools and community groups in both urban and rural areas who provide school meals.
For families with school-going children, school meals can make a real and important contribution to ensuring that children receive better nutrition. Such services can also contribute to improved school attendance and quality of learning. Expenditure on the schools meals programme for 2006 will be of the order of €13 million and will benefit some 125,000 pupils in approx 1,400 schools in 2006. In Budget 2007, I have provided a further €3m for the school meals scheme.
My Department commissioned the Irish Nutrition and Dietetic Institute to undertake a study into the cost of healthy eating and specialised diets for a single individual in Ireland. This study, which was published in January 2006, brought an up-to-date focus on the varying costs of healthy foods and contained proposals for specialised diets based on the latest dietary and medical views. This study found that, depending on whether a person shopped in a low cost supermarket or convenience store, a healthy eating diet could be purchased for between €40.38 and €59.38 at January 2006 prices. This is equivalent to between 24% and 38% of the minimum weekly social welfare payment of €165.80.
Healthy eating is affected by dietary and nutritional awareness, cultural attitudes and access to good quality grocery shopping, as well as to the adequacy of social welfare income supports. In recent years, budgetary increases in social welfare payment rates have consistently exceeded increases in the cost of living. This key policy is the primary focus of Budget allocations to my Department each year, and it has helped ensure that those depending on social welfare experience real improvement in their ability to meet their basic needs, including provision of adequate food, heating, etc.
In this regard, consumer price index information from the Central Statistics Office indicates that the cost of food and non-alcoholic beverages has increased by 1.7% over the past 12 months. From December 2001 to date, food and non-alcoholic beverages increased by just 3.7% in aggregate while increases in social welfare payment rates increased by between 47% and 56% in the same period. As overall total inflation amounted to less than 18% in that period, there has been a very significant real increase in purchasing power for people on social welfare.
I am satisfied that the policy of providing substantial real increases in primary social insurance and assistance payment rates has been effective in ensuring that those who depend on social welfare income have sufficient income for healthy food.
38 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the persons appointed since he has taken up office to State boards, working groups, committees and other body comprising nominees from outside organisations which are under the aegis of his Department;; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43297/06]
The five statutory agencies operating under the aegis of my Department are the Pensions Board, the Combat Poverty Agency, Comhairle, the Family Support Agency and the Social Welfare Tribunal. In addition the Pensions Ombudsman comes under the remit of my Department.
Since my appointment as Minister for Social and Family Affairs I have appointed persons to fill vacancies as they occur on Boards under the aegis of my Department as follows:
Seventeen to the Pensions Board
Eleven to the Board of the Combat Poverty Agency
Twelve to the Board of Comhairle
Fifteen to the Board of the Family Support Agency
Five to the Social Welfare Tribunal.
When making appointments to the various agencies I take into consideration the experience, skills and suitability of the individuals concerned having regard to the functions of the particular Board or Agency. I also consider the requirements of Government policy on gender balance for membership of State Boards.
39 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will report on progress regarding the development of a National Carers Strategy as committed to under the partnership agreement Towards 2016. [43241/06]
50 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the organisations he has included in his consultation process for a national carers strategy; the progress he has made in relation to same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43289/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 39 and 50 together.
Supporting and recognising carers in our society has been a priority of the Government since 1997. Over that period, weekly payment rates to carers have been greatly increased, qualifying conditions for carer's allowance have been significantly eased, coverage of the scheme has been extended and new schemes such as carer's benefit and the respite care grant have been introduced and extended.
One of the key Government commitments in the national partnership agreement — Towards 2016 — is the development of a National Carer's Strategy. This strategy, which will focus on supporting informal and family carers in the community, will be developed by the end of 2007. It is expected that work on the strategy will begin early in the new year.
While social welfare supports for carers will clearly be a key issue in the strategy, other issues such as access to respite and other services, education, training and employment will also feature strongly. Co-operation between relevant Government departments and agencies is essential if the provision of services, supports and entitlements for carers is to be fully addressed. For that reason all relevant departments and agencies will be involved in the strategy and there will be appropriate consultation with the social partners.
This type of co-operation is also reflected in the "Towards 2016" commitment that my Department lead the development of a structured consultation process to inform future policy in relation to carers. This will involve an annual meeting of carer's representative groups and relevant department and agencies.
I am pleased that the first such meeting has already been held and that the issues raised there informed the package of measure for carers which I announced in Budget 2007. I am committed to working for, and with, carers to deliver increased benefits, supports, and services for them and their families.
41 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the submissions he has received with regard to improvements in the carers allowance scheme; the scope or potential to develop this carers scheme as a social assistance payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43166/06]
43 Mr. M. Brady asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the way persons who qualify for the new half-rate carers allowance can claim their benefit; the number of social welfare recipients he expects to benefit from this change; the impact on carers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43154/06]
45 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the implications for the payment of a half rate carers allowance to people in receipt of other welfare payments will have on the rule which forbids the payment of two welfare payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43285/06]
70 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on either individualising the means test for carers allowance or introducing a cost of care payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43283/06]
72 Mr. Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the procedure for those who are eligible for the new half-rate carers allowance; the numbers expected to benefit from the increased income disregard; the way these changes will affect the availability of carers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43302/06]
86 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on abolishing the means test for the carers allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43123/06]
97 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans to extend the carers allowance to persons currently providing care but not receiving a payment due to means testing; his views on offering a partial payment to such persons; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43198/06]
291 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the anticipated cost of providing a carers payment or part thereof to each person currently caring for someone; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43617/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 41, 43, 45, 70, 72, 86, 97 and 291 together.
Supporting and recognising carers in our society is and has been a priority of the Government since 1997. Over that period, weekly payment rates to carers have been greatly increased, qualifying conditions for carer's allowance have been significantly eased, coverage of the scheme has been extended and new schemes such as carer's benefit and the respite care grant have been introduced and extended.
According to Census 2002, there are some 148,750 people providing care to someone for at least 1 hour per week. Of these, 48,500 people are providing personal care for more than 29 hours per week or just over 4 hours per day. More than 14,300 of this group are employed for more than 15 hours per week.
At present there are just over 27,100 people in receipt of carer's allowance. A further 1,400 people are in receipt of carer's benefit. As a result of the extension of the respite care grant to all full time carers regardless of their means some 34,000 grants are now being paid, including over 8,300 grants to people who are not in receipt of carer's allowance or carer's benefit.
In line with other social assistance schemes, a means test is applied to the carer's allowance so as to ensure that limited resources are directed to those in greatest need. This means test has been eased significantly over the years most notably with the introduction of spouse's earnings disregard.
Following Budget 2006, since April, the earnings disregard for a couple has been set at €580 per week which is equivalent to gross average industrial earnings. As a result of further improvements which I announced in the Budget 2007 this disregard will increase to €640 per week for a couple from April 2007.
When this increase is in place a couple with two children will be able to earn up to €36,240 and still qualify for the maximum rate of carer's allowance as well as the associated free travel and household benefits.
This measure surpasses the commitment in Towards 2016 to ensure that those on average industrial earnings can continue to qualify for a full carer's allowance.
It is estimated that complete abolition of the means test for carer's allowance would cost over €140 million in a full year. The view of some support organisations is that if this level of resources were available, it would be more beneficial to carers if it were invested in further increases to carers allowance and in the type of community care services which would support them in their caring role, such as additional respite care facilities, more home helps, public health nurses and other such services.
From June 2005, I extended the annual respite care grant to all carers who are providing full time care to a person who needs such care regardless of their income. Those persons in receipt of other social welfare payments, excluding jobseeker's assistance and benefit, are entitled to this payment subject to meeting the full time care condition. In Budget 2007 I provided for the level of the grant to increase by €300 to €1,500 from June next year.
The primary objective of the social welfare system is to provide income support and as a general rule only one weekly social welfare payment is payable to an individual. Persons qualifying for two social welfare payments receive the higher payment to which they are entitled. I am aware that this has been a cause of particular concern to people in receipt of a social welfare payment when they become carers.
For that reason I was very pleased to introduce fundamental structural reforms in this area in Budget 2007. In future people in receipt of another social welfare payment who are also providing full time care and attention to a person will be able to retain their main welfare payment and receive another payment depending on their means, the maximum of which will be equivalent of a half rate carer's allowance.
It is estimated that approximately 18,000 carers will benefit from this measure at cost of €56.72 million in a full year. The precise details regarding how this new arrangement will operate are being examined and will be set out in legislation early next year. The measure will come into effect in September 2007.
Each year I receive a significant number of pre-Budget submissions, many of which include proposals in relation to the carer's allowance. I also receive a large number of representations both from public representatives, representative organisations and members of the public relating to income support for carers. Among the most common issues raised are the means test for carer's allowance, the position of people in receipt of a payment other than carer's allowance or benefit who are also providing full time care and attention and the level of the payment. I am pleased that Budget 2007 includes improvements relating to each of these issues.
I have already outlined the new arrangements for people in receipt of another social welfare payment and the increases in the income disregard. In addition, I have increased the rates of carer's allowance to €200 per week for those aged under 66 and to €218 per week for those aged over 66.
Towards 2016 commits the Government to continuing to scope for further development of the carer's allowance, carer's benefit and the respite care grant. I am committed to working for, and with, carers to deliver increased benefits, supports, and services for them and their families. The improvements for carers which I announced in Budget 2007 are further evidence of this commitment.
42 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the IFA estimate as outlined in the IFA Budget Submission 2007, that there are approximately 6000 farmers not availing of farm assist; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43267/06]
The farm assist scheme, which introduced special arrangements for farmers on low incomes, was provided for in the Social Welfare Act, 1999 and came into operation with effect from 7 April 1999.
There are currently 7,483 farm assist recipients and the average weekly payment is €178.52. The level of take-up since the farm assist scheme was first introduced in April 1999 significantly reversed the ongoing downward trend in numbers under the smallholders assistance scheme which preceded it, reaching its highest level at approximately 8,500 prior to the introduction of the rural social scheme (RSS) by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, in May 2004. Numbers participating have decreased since then due to the transfer of farmers to the RSS.
In addition, take up would have been affected by the increase in off-farm employment by farmers and their spouses in recent years.
Farm assist has been widely promoted in various ways over the years, which included a major media campaign on local radio to promote the scheme, conducted in the Autumn of 2002 at a cost of almost €100,000. The campaign consisted of prime time spots in 19 local radio stations and the placing of adverts in the provincial papers and farm publications. During the same period an information video about the scheme was transmitted at 24 livestock marts nationwide. The video was also shown on a large screen at the National Ploughing Championships in September 2002 and in each subsequent year, including this year.
My Department's Information Service, in conjunction with the IFA, has presented information seminars on the scheme to groups of farmers at various locations throughout the country. The farm assist video was shown at these presentations and was followed by a Q&A session. In 2003 a follow up advert was placed in the Irish Farmers Handbook.
Farm assist has brought about significant worthwhile improvements for low income farmers, particularly for those with children, making a valuable contribution to supporting those who are at the lower end of the farm income spectrum. For this reason my Department will continue to promote and publicise the scheme in order to achieve and maintain maximum take up.
48 Mr. M. Brady asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the way he envisages qualified adults benefiting from plans to bring their payments to the level of the State pension; the number of qualified adults he expects to qualify for a direct payment in their own right; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43155/06]
91 Mr. Carey asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the way qualified adults will benefit from the commitment to bring their payments to the level of the State pension; the number of qualified adults who are expected to be eligible for a direct payment in their own right; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43150/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 48 and 91 together.
In the context of the recent Budget, I announced significant improvements in the rate of payment for qualified adults on State pensions and important changes in the way these payments will be made in the future. The Programme for Government contains a commitment "to introduce a personal pension entitlement for pensioner spouses currently in receipt of the qualified adult allowance, set at the level of a full non-contributory pension". The changes introduced in this budget mark a significant step in this regard, while setting in place a programme that will bring the Qualified Adults to the level of the State non-contributory pension within the next three years.
Arising from the Budget the increase payable in respect of Qualified Adults will increase by Eur23.70 per week for State Pension (Contributory), State Pension (Transition) and Invalidity Pension where the Qualified Adult is aged 66 years of age or over. This represents an increase of 15.9% in the rate of payment and brings the payment to 86.5% of the target rate. Prior to the budget the maximum payment for a qualified adult represented 82% of the State non-contributory Pension rate. Some 35,500 Qualified Adults will benefit from this increased level of payment.
The making of personal payments direct to Qualified Adults was introduced for new claimants to State Pension Transition (SPT) and State pension contributory (SPC) with effect from 1 October 2002. Under the procedures currently in place, personal and Qualified Adult payments are made as a combined amount to the applicant. However, applicants may choose to avail of the facility to be paid separately. Thus far, a total of 1,400 couples have opted to have the qualified adult allowance paid directly to the spouse.
Following the changes announced in the Budget qualified adults will be entitled to automatically receive their portion of the pension as a separate payment. Claim forms will be amended accordingly and there will be an opt-out option included for customers who wish to be paid their pension jointly. The revised arrangements will apply to new applicants for SPT, SPC and SPn/c with effect from September 2007.
The operational arrangements for implementing this initiative are currently being devised in my Department and will be finalised shortly. It is envisaged that some 2,000 additional Qualified Adults will benefit from this direct payment of the IQA (Increase for Qualified Adult) during 2007. In a full year approximately 6,000 Qualified Adults would benefit based on current trends.
51 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will report on his Department’s engagement and subsequent policy developments in the latest negotiations at the European Union level Social Questions Group. [43251/06]
At present the European Union Social Questions Group are considering two related proposals dealing with the co-ordination of social security systems within the European Union and a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the portability of supplementary pension rights. These proposals have been discussed over the past 18 months under the UK, Austrian and Finnish Presidencies and officials from my Department have attended the meetings of the Social Questions Working Group dealing with these matters.
The rules on the coordination of social security systems are currently contained in Regulation (EEC) 1408/71 and its implementing Regulation (EEC) 574/72. In 1998 the Commission presented a proposal to modernise and simplify the provisions of Regulation 1408/71. Following negotiation, Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004 was adopted on 29 April 2004. This was the first step in a process aimed at modernizing and simplifying the EU rules on the co-ordination of social security rights of migrant workers. This process must be completed with the adoption of an implementing regulation to replace Regulation (EEC) 574/72 and of a regulation that will form the content of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) 883/04. The new co-ordination rules contained in Regulation 883/04 cannot be applied until both these proposals have been adopted by both the EU Council of Ministers and the European Parliament.
The first proposal sets out these implementing provisions, the aim of which is to define the procedures needed to implement the principles of Regulation 883/2004. The second proposal includes provisions regarding specific aspects of individual Member States' legislation that will form the content of Annex XI to Regulation (EC) 883/2004.
With regard to the proposal for a Directive on the Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights, the Council at its recent meeting, noted the contents of a Progress Report from the Finnish presidency and held a policy debate on the proposals on improving the portability of supplementary pension rights. The draft directive attempts to address a number of issues which, in the context of pension provision, present obstacles to the free movement of workers. These issues relate to the acquisition, preservation and transfer of pension rights in respect of workers who change employment both within and across member States.
Despite extensive discussions at the Social Questions Group, it had not been possible to reach agreement on the proposals in the draft directive, especially those in relation to the transfer of pension rights. It is expected that the Council will continue the examination of these proposals.
52 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will make a statement on the National Report for Ireland on Strategies for Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2006 to 2008. [43244/06]
In March 2006, EU Employment and Social Affairs Ministers agreed a new framework for the modernisation of Member States' social protection systems and the promotion of greater social cohesion across the European Union. Under this new framework, Member States are required to draw up national reports, covering a three year period, on strategies for social protection and social inclusion which address the specific challenges in each of the following policy areas — social inclusion, pensions, healthcare and long-term care. The new framework envisages a positive interaction, at national level, between the National Reform Programmes for growth and jobs and the strategies for social protection and social inclusion.
All Member States submitted integrated National Reports on Strategies for Social Protection and Social Inclusion covering the period 2006-2008. Ireland's national report was prepared by my Department in conjunction with the Department of Health and Children. All other relevant government Departments were consulted including the Departments of An Taoiseach, Finance and Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
The preparation of Ireland's strategy took place in the context of the agreement of a new social partnership agreement, Towards 2016. This agreement outlines a new framework within which key social challenges have been developed around the "lifecycle" approach. The agreed 10 year strategic vision and key long-term goals for each stage of the lifecycle, together with agreed priority actions for the initial phase of the agreement, form the basis of measures outlined in this Report. The Agreement also included commitments to the development of a new comprehensive strategy for pensions policy, including the publication of a green paper and to the delivery of tangible improvements in the health outcomes of children, people of working age, older people and people with disabilities.
The social inclusion component of the national strategy reports represent the National Action Plans for social inclusion (NAP/inclusion) and present the key priorities in Member States' efforts to promote greater social inclusion and make a decisive impact on poverty over the two year period of the plan. In this context, four key priorities were identified by EU Member States as being common to many of them and as areas where they can benefit most from exchanges of experience and best practice. These include child poverty; access to quality work and learning opportunities; integration of immigrants and access to quality services.
The forthcoming new National Action Plan on social inclusion, to be produced in early 2007, will set out in greater detail the social inclusion elements covered in the national report and will elaborate on the commitments contained in Towards 2016.
With regard to pensions, the national report includes an update on developments in both the State and private occupational pensions systems since 2005. It refers in particular, to the Government's commitments in the Towards 2016 agreement to enhancement of social welfare pensions over the period of the agreement subject to adequate resources and building on the commitment to a rate of €200 per week for social welfare pensions by 2007 and to the publication of a Green Paper on Pensions Policy outlining the major policy choices and challenges in this area.
53 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if and when he will deliver on an all-Ireland free travel pass for pensioners as promised in the Programme for Government. [43257/06]
As I have previously advised the House, the proposed all-Ireland free travel scheme will enable pensioners resident here and in Northern Ireland to travel free of charge on all eligible transport services on the island.
Implementation of a single travel pass, acceptable in both jurisdictions, will require the completion of the Integrated Ticketing project being developed under the auspices of the Department of Transport and subsequent integration with the ticketing systems in operation in Northern Ireland. My Department has on-going engagement with these bodies and projects.
Pending development of a single pass, my Department has engaged with the Department of Regional Development and Translink, the main transport authority in Northern Ireland, to put in place an interim scheme to permit residents of both jurisdictions to avail of free travel within the other jurisdiction. This interim scheme will extend the existing cross-border free travel arrangements by allowing pensioners resident here travel free of charge on all bus and rail services in Northern Ireland. Likewise, pensioners in Northern Ireland will travel free of charge on transport services in this State.
Intensive work in relation to the introduction of the scheme has taken place including consultation with the transport operators in both jurisdictions. Work has progressed on the design of the operation of the new scheme including a new registration process, design of a new travel card and application form. The necessary ICT system changes have been identified, the technical elements of the new system have been delivered and a programme of testing and training has commenced. Consultation with staff has commenced on the introduction of this system.
The project is scheduled to be operational at the end of Quarter 1, 2007.
54 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has examined the possibility of introducing a specific payment for people with disabilities to assist them in meeting extra costs they may face; if an estimate has been made of the cost of such a payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43282/06]
A National Disability Survey, a follow-up to the latest Population Census is currently being conducted by the Central Statistics Office, the results of which will be available next year. This is the first national survey in Ireland specifically designed to capture the prevalence of different types of disability and the extent to which those affected participate in various activities.
The three most recent sources of data on the demographics and economic status of people with disabilities are the Census 2002, the Quarterly National Household Survey (QHNS) special modules on disability undertaken in 2002 and 2004, and the Living in Ireland Survey, which was conducted on a uniform basis each year from 1995 to 2001. A recent report by the National Disability Authority on a Comprehensive Employment Strategy for People with Disabilities, drawing on the data sources for 2004, estimates that of a population of 298,300, 110,800 people with disabilities were in employment, 9,200 were unemployed and 178,300 were not economically active.
Using this data, the estimated cost of the introduction of a universal payment of €40 per week for people with disabilities, regardless of labour force status is €620m per annum. If this payment were directed only towards those who are unemployed or not economically active, the estimated cost is €390m per annum.
A working group established under the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness (PPF), with cross-departmental membership which includes my Department and chaired by the Department of Health and Children, has examined the feasibility of the introduction of a cost of disability payment.
The National Disability Authority, on behalf of the working group and in line with its own remit, commissioned research into the feasibility of the introduction of such a payment. The purpose of this research was to advise regarding the additional costs incurred by people with disabilities, owing specifically to the direct or indirect costs of disability and the appropriate mechanisms or instruments by which to address identified additional costs. The resultant report, Disability and the Cost of Living, was subsequently published by the National Disability Authority.
The group considers it vital that comprehensive data is available on which to base consideration of the introduction of a cost of disability payment, in addition to a structured process of the assessment of need. The working group recommended that steps be taken to improve the quality of data relating to disability in Ireland, for example, adjustment of existing data gathering exercises undertaken by the Central Statistics Office. This will be addressed in the aforementioned disability survey currently being undertaken by the CSO.
The group has also examined the scope for addressing barriers that exist for people with disabilities who wish to undertake or increase their employment and thus move to a position of greater economic independence. In this regard, as part of the Social Welfare Budget package 2006, I introduced a change to the withdrawal rate of Disability Allowance and Blind Pension for income in excess of the current earnings disregard level which means that a single person can earn up to a maximum of €390 per week from rehabilitative employment before their Disability Allowance or Blind Pension is fully withdrawn. The outcome of this change will be monitored to assess its effect on increased employment participation and to identify any further policy changes required.
In terms of ensuring adequate levels of income for people with disabilities, the current ten-year Social Partnership Agreement, Towards 2016, includes the commitment to work for the continued enhancement and integration of supports in line with overall social welfare targets. These will include a rationalisation of existing allowances for people with disabilities in the context of the Government's policy of mainstreaming and the proposed transfer of functions from the Health Services Executive to my Department which includes a number of disability-related schemes, including the Domiciliary Care Allowance, Mobility Allowance and Blind Welfare Allowance. An inter-departmental working group has now been established to progress the implementation of this transfer.
Other issues around the cost of disability will be considered following the development of a needs assessment system provided for under Part 2 of the Disability Act, 2005.
My Department's Disability Sectoral Plan similarly contains actions in relation to the rationalisation of existing allowances for people with disabilities. The Plan also includes agreed protocols with the Department of Health and Children and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment on actions required to ensure that income supports and associated benefits do not create financial barriers to people with disabilities participating in the labour force or availing of training, educational or other developmental opportunities.
I look forward to the implementation of the sectoral plan over the next three years and to continuing the commitment to expand and deliver services that best support, recognise and encourage people with disabilities as well as those in a caring role.
55 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on a national advertising campaign to promote greater awareness of social welfare entitlements, similar to the campaign being run by the Revenue Commissioners to promote greater awareness of tax allowances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43143/06]
My Department aims to ensure that all citizens are made aware of their rights and entitlements and that they are kept informed of changes and improvements in schemes and services as they occur. The provision of information in a clear and accessible manner is an essential element in the achievement of this objective.
My Department takes a pro-active approach in advertising its schemes and services by using an appropriate mix of national and provincial media, information leaflets, factsheets, posters, direct mailshots, advertising on television screens in over 60 Credit Unions nationwide, and by distributing information booklets to health centres throughout the country.
National advertising campaigns are undertaken periodically to promote greater awareness of a specific scheme or to highlight changes in schemes and services. The following campaigns have been undertaken in 2006:
In March, my Department undertook a nationwide awareness campaign to promote and encourage take up of the Family Income Supplement (FIS) scheme. An extensive week-long campaign included advertising on television, on national and local radio and in national and regional newspapers. Since this campaign was undertaken the number of new claims applications is 11,551 and renewals are 15,693 compared with 6,327 and 11,966 for the same period in 2005.
In August, the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance was advertised in national and regional newspapers.
During the last week of September, an information campaign was conducted on television, on national and local radio and in national and regional newspapers to raise public awareness of the Carer's Allowance, Carer's Benefit and the Respite Care Grant, schemes designed to provide supports for carers. This campaign has proved successful. For example, the number of Respite Care Grants which will have issued in 2006 is expected to be of the order of 36,000 as compared with 34,300 approximately in 2005.
My Department's PRSI information emailing service was recently advertised in the business supplements of the national newspapers. Employers and payroll companies were invited to register their details with the Department. Early notification, by email, of PRSI changes such as Budget Information will be provided to those who register their email addresses on my Department's website.
As part of the Budget awareness campaign, this year, as in previous years, advertisements were placed in the national and regional newspapers listing phone numbers, including a Budget Freephone number, which customers could contact to receive information on changes in the various social welfare schemes and services.
A LoCall helpline (1890 66 22 44) was provided for all campaigns. In addition to the LoCall number, the campaigns also highlight other sources of information available to the public, including my Department's network of Social Welfare Local Offices, Citizens Information Centres and my Department's website (www.welfare.ie). The responses to the campaigns have been encouraging and resulted in increases in the number of applications received for the schemes.
In view of the range of services available from my Department it would not be possible to highlight all of them in a single advertising campaign. Therefore, nationwide advertising campaigns are designed to highlight specific schemes and services. Targeted advertising campaigns focusing on specific schemes and services will continue to be a key priority for me in the drive to ensure that citizens are aware of and claim their social welfare entitlements. I have secured an additional €0.75m in the budget for entitlement awareness campaigns in 2007.
59 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects to publish the results of the research project designed to establish the factors behind the low level of take up of the family income supplement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43293/06]
93 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs further to Parliamentary Question No. 128 of 14 November 2006, the progress to date in the research project to establish the reason behind the low take-up rate of family income supplement; if the project has begun; if not, when it is due to begin; the estimated completion date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43270/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 59 and 93 together.
The Family Income Supplement provides income support for employees on low earnings with families. This preserves the incentive to remain in employment in circumstances where the employee might only be marginally better off than if he or she were claiming other social welfare payments. There are currently 22,352 people in receipt of FIS.
The reasons for the perceived lack of take-up of FIS have been the subject of significant Parliamentary and interest group enquiry. In response, my Department undertook a nationwide awareness campaign last March to promote and encourage increased take up of the Family Income Supplement scheme for working families on low incomes. This extensive week-long campaign included advertising on TV, on national and local radio and in the national and regional press. A nation-wide poster campaign was also undertaken. As a result, the take up of FIS was substantially improved. In Budget 2007, I was pleased to increase income thresholds for FIS by €15 per week to €185 per week.
The second element to address FIS take up issues is the proposed commissioning of a specific research project to examine factors behind the level of take up for the scheme. Tenders to undertake this work have been invited and received by my Department and these are currently being evaluated. The project will commence early in 2007 with a view to its completion in the second quarter of 2007.
60 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the steps he has taken or plans to take arising from criticism by the Pensions Ombudsman of what he called the theft by employers of pension contributions deducted from employees but not remitted to pension schemes, particularly in the construction sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43127/06]
106 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs that steps he will take arising from criticism by the Pensions Ombudsman of what he called the theft by employers of pension contributions deducted from employees but not remitted to pension schemes, particularly in the construction sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43134/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 60 and 106 together.
The Construction Federation Operatives Pensions Scheme operates as a Registered Employment Agreement under the Industrial Relations Acts. There is a statutory obligation on employers to register eligible employees in the scheme and to pay the necessary contributions.
Compliance with the terms of the scheme is enforced through the Construction Industry Monitoring Agency, the Labour Court and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. The Pensions Board also has a role in relation to the scheme in so far as compliance with the various aspects of the Pensions Act is concerned and there are a number of provisions in the Act relating to the remittance of pension contributions to scheme trustees.
It is important that employees are in a position to monitor the deduction and remittance of their contributions so that any problems in this area will be apparent as early as possible. Accordingly, employers are required to ensure that a statement is issued to employees at least once a month, and to the trustees or the person to whom the employer remits contributions direct, specifying the amount of contributions remitted on their behalf to trustees.
In relation to defined benefit schemes this statement should specify the amount of employee contribution which has been remitted. In relation to defined contribution schemes the statement should specify the amount of both the employee and employer contribution remitted. This disclosure can be made via the payslip. The actual amount remitted during the period to which the statement relates may be specified on the payslip or, alternatively, where the amount of employee deduction and employer contribution which were specified on the previous payslip have since been remitted, a statement to that effect may be included on or with the payslip.
Employers who deduct pension contributions from employees and who fail to remit these contributions to the scheme trustees are in breach of Section 58A of the Pensions Act. The Pensions Board will investigate all such cases brought to its attention or, alternatively, it is open to a person to make a complaint to the Pensions Ombudsman.
In general I am satisfied that the necessary legislation is in place to deal with cases where contributions are not remitted to scheme trustees and that any such cases brought to attention will be fully investigated by the appropriate authorities.
61 Mr. Ardagh asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the supports available for bereaved people; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43160/06]
There is a number of social welfare supports available to assist families in coping with bereavement and the associated expenses. The Bereavement Grant is a one off payment paid to families of insured people to assist them with funeral expenses. I was glad to be able to increase the grant from €635 to €850, with effect from Budget day, 6 December 2006. It is paid to the spouse, partner, next of kin or personal representative of the deceased or to the person responsible for the payment of the funeral bill. The scheme covers virtually all insured persons, including the self-employed and people covered by the modified rate of social insurance. In instances where there are insufficient social insurance contributions to qualify for the grant, financial assistance may be sought under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme.
Where a person dies, the surviving spouse may be entitled to a Widow or Widower's (Contributory) Pension, subject to satisfying the insurance based conditions. Alternatively, where the insurance based conditions are not satisfied, the person may be entitled to a non-contributory pension, subject to a means test. Where the widowed person has dependent children a Widowed Parent Grant may also be payable. This payment is designed to assist with the income support needs of widows and widowers with dependent children in the immediate aftermath of a bereavement. It is payable to widows and widowers with dependent children who qualify for a Widow/er's Contributory Pension or a One Parent Family Payment or a Bereavement Grant payable on the death of their spouse. In the Budget, earlier this month, I increased the rate of the Widowed Parent Grant from €2,700, to €4,000 with effect from Budget day, 6 December 2006.
Where a spouse or partner dies while receiving a social welfare payment, the payment is paid to the spouse or partner for 6 weeks after the date of death (provided the original payment included an increase in respect of their spouse or partner). This continued payment provides a financial buffer to the surviving spouse, in the period after the bereavement. This payment is generally paid as a lump sum. Guardian's (Formerly Orphans) Contributory or Non-Contributory Payments may also be payable in the case of bereavement where there is a dependent child, i.e., to age 18 or 22 years if in full-time education.
In order to ensure that people avail of their entitlements, my Department produces a comprehensive range of information leaflets that are available countrywide in Local Offices, Citizen's Information Centres and Post Offices. Information Officers are available in Local Offices to explain the supports and services to customers on a one to one basis and to help and assist them in completing forms and assessing their entitlements. Information relating to social welfare entitlements is also available on my Department's web site at www.welfare.ie and from the Citizens Information Board (formerly Comhairle) at www.citizensinformation.ie. A LO-CALL number is also available nationwide to provide access to information at local call rates at 1890 777121. I am satisfied that a comprehensive range of measures, financial and otherwise, is in place to respond to the support needs of bereaved people.
65 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he expects to allow people aged over 65 years who are working to continue to pay social insurance to improve their contributions record; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43258/06]
Since taking Office this Government has made the needs of older people a priority and the commitment to ensure that as many people as possible can qualify for contributory pensions is at the core of this policy. In this context, changes have been made to the qualifying conditions for pension which make it easier for people to qualify for pensions. These include the reduction in the yearly average number of contributions required for pension purposes from 20 to 10 and the introduction of pro-rata pensions and a number of special half-rate pensions for those who had marginally failed to qualify for contributory pensions.
I consider it important that those who wish to continue in employment after normal retirement age should, as far as is possible, be facilitated and supported. Longer working can play an important role in ensuring that our pensions system is sustainable in the future and can be beneficial to the individual. For this reason, and to improve income support for older people, the new enhanced State pension (non-contributory) for those over 66 years which I introduced at the end of September, featured an employment earnings disregard incentive of €100 per week for those who wish to earn extra income to continue in employment. I was happy to enhance this incentive to €200 per week in last week's Budget.
In a wider context, The National Pensions Review, published in January, includes recommendations from the Pensions Board designed to encourage people to continue working after normal retirement age. The measures suggested involve allowing people to defer receiving their social welfare pension at normal pension age and to grant them an actuarially enhanced payment when they claim. The Pensions Board also considered that if this was combined with allowing those with less than full entitlements to count contributions made after age 65 or 66 in order to improve their contribution record, this would complete the incentives for longer working within the social welfare pensions system. I am in broad agreement with the suggestions and will be seeking to have them introduced as soon as is practical.
However, issues surrounding social welfare payments represent only one aspect of the problem. As I have said before, we require a change in attitudes in relation to longer working from both employers and employees. Employers must seek to retain older employees and create the conditions which will make longer working both attractive and feasible for older workers.
With regard to pensions generally, the Government is committed to producing a Green Paper on pensions as part of the new social partnership agreement Towards 2016 with a view to developing a framework for future pensions policy. This will include an examination of the issues surrounding retirement age and the barriers faced by older workers who wish to remain in employment. The Green Paper will be published within months. A consultation process will then take place and the Government will subsequently publish a framework for future pensions policy.
66 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the estimated take-up rate of the back to school clothing and footwear allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43264/06]
75 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of applications received for the back to school clothing and footwear allowance in 2006; the number of late applications received; the number of unsuccessful applications for 2006; if he will extend the timeframe for applications; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43294/06]
84 Ms B. Moynihan-Cronin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has received final figures on the number of applications received under the back to school clothing and footwear allowance scheme in 2006; the number of applications accepted; the total amount paid out; the average amount paid out; the number of applications turned down; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43142/06]
99 Mr. Andrews asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number he expects to benefit from changes to the back to school clothing and footwear allowance announced in Budget 2007; the way he envisages the extra funding for school meals being used; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43239/06]
111 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on whether the increase in the back to school clothing and footwear allowance reflect the true costs of sending children to school. [43253/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 66, 75, 84, 99 and 111 together.
The back to school clothing and footwear allowance scheme (BSCFA) operates from the beginning of June to the end of September each year and is administered on behalf of my Department by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. Applications for the allowance may be made between the beginning of June and the end of September each year. While the closing date for applications for BSCFA was 30th September 2006, processing and payment of late applications remained ongoing during November. Current indications are that about 84,800 families with approximately 172,000 children will benefit from the scheme this year at a cost of €25.4m. This is an increase on the 2005 figures when some 76,166 families with 157,254 children benefited at a cost of €16.7m.
Based on information received to date the average number of successful applications in 2006 was 89.9% of all applications received. The estimated number of applications refused in 2006 is 19,323 (10.1%) out of applications made in respect of over 191,000 children. In previous years, the national average number of applications granted was 88.3% of all applications received.
The BSCFA is a demand led scheme and statistics are not available on the take-up by families who might satisfy the qualifying conditions for the allowance but who have not applied. The Department has increased its publicity in this area to ensure that as many families as possible are aware of the scheme and further awareness initiatives will be undertaken in 2007.
Final figures in relation to the numbers of applications received and awarded for 2006 are not yet available from the HSE. Current indications are that the number of applications received has increased nationwide. This can be mainly attributed to improvements in income disregards introduced this year, and the significant level of publicity given to this scheme in the media and through the other information services operated by my Department.
Applications for the allowance may be made between the beginning of June and the end of September each year. This period was designated as it is the time that parents are preparing and budgeting for back to school expenditure. As the principal objective of the scheme is to assist eligible families with the extra costs when their children start school each autumn, the most practical time to implement the scheme is in the lead up to each new academic year. In dealing with the large volume of applications received, the Health Service Executive deploys additional staffing resources for the duration of the scheme during the June to September period. In the case of late applications exceptional needs payments under the SWA scheme may be paid where warranted.
Extending the deadline for applications for back to school clothing and footwear allowance would have some scheme and administrative costs and there would be little or no gain to the public. I consider the existing period of application to be adequate and targeted in meeting the demand. In previous years, the national average number of applications made after the end of September was 1.5% of all applications received. Based on information received to date the number of applications received in 2006 after the end of September is approximately 2,600 or 1.4% of all applications received. These have been either processed under BSCFA or as claims for an Exceptional Needs Payment (ENP). From June 2006, an allowance of €120 was payable in respect of qualified children aged from 2 to 11 years, or €190 in respect of qualified children aged from 12 to 22 years.
As announced in Budget 2007, the rate of payment of BSCFA is being increased by €60 per child for children aged 2 to 11 years old and €95 for children aged 12 to 22 — a 50% increase on the current allowance. The new rates (applicable for 2007) are €180 for children aged 2 to 11 years old and €285 for children aged 12 to 22. The annual expenditure on the scheme will increase to €38.1m as a result of this measure (€12.71m + €25.4m). The number of children that will benefit in 2007 is expected to be similar to 2006.
These improvements in BSCFA are very significant when viewed in the context of clothing and footwear price trends. According to the Consumer Price Index for October 2006, the overall cost of clothing and footwear has fallen by 1.7% over the past twelve months. Since December 2001, clothing and footwear costs have decreased by 15.4%.
I consider the back to school clothing and footwear allowance scheme to be an important support for parents at a time of particular financial strain. I am satisfied that the improvements to the scheme for this year and next year provide a major boost to meeting the financial costs associated with return to school for those who most need assistance.
The school meals programme operated by my Department gives funding towards provision of food services for disadvantaged school children through two schemes. The first is the long-standing statutory urban school meals scheme, currently operated by 36 local authorities. The second is the school meals community (local projects) programme through which funding is provided by my Department to participating schools and voluntary community groups in both urban and rural areas who are running specific school meals projects, including breakfast clubs.
The Department of Education and Science has initiated a new action plan "Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools" (DEIS) which incorporates many of that Department's existing schemes which target educational disadvantage including schools with the highest concentration of early school leavers. A total of 875 schools were identified by the Department of Education and Science as disadvantaged under the (DEIS) action plan. Over 400 of these schools are already receiving school meal funding. The remaining schools have been contacted by my Department and invited to apply for funding. The additional €3m funding announced in the recent budget will allow for the current number of participating schools to be increased by over 200 additional disadvantaged DEIS schools which will benefit an estimated 20,000 extra children in 2007.
The school meals programme makes an important contribution to ensuring that school children receive better nutrition and contributes to improved school attendance and quality of learning. All relevant research indicates that there is a strong link between nutritional intake and cognitive ability and that inadequate nutrition impacts negatively on a child's ability to learn and benefit from education. The scheme also supports initiatives that target dispersed disadvantage and children with special needs.
67 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has examined the recent TASC publication Taming the Tiger Social Exclusion in a Globalised Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43249/06]
The TASC publication Taming the Tiger — Social Inclusion in a Globalised Ireland, published last month, has recently been received by officials in my Department and is among the publications currently being examined by them. The various analyses contained in the publication, which consider aspects of the challenge presented by globalisation to social inclusion in Ireland, will form a useful contribution to the ongoing process of policy development to tackle poverty and social exclusion in this country.
68 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his plans for alleviating child poverty in view of his Budget 2007 proposals for the investment of almost €300 million; his plans for specific targeting of qualified child allowance and family income supplement; the number expected to be eligible for back to school clothing and footwear allowance; the way the additional funding for school meals will be utilised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43156/06]
Budget 2007 introduced a package of measures costing €300 million aimed at alleviating child poverty. By channelling income support in a number of ways, this package of measures is designed to balance the need to provide support universally through child benefit, with targeting those most in need by increasing child dependant allowances, family income supplement, back to school clothing and footwear allowance and school meals.
In addition to child benefit increases of €10 per month at a cost of €243.70 in a full year, all three child dependant allowances will also be increased and consolidated into a new single rate of €22.00 per week. This increase, the first in 12 years, will benefit approximately 342,000 children at a cost of €56.13 million in a full year and represents a more selective approach to child income support through its targeting of children in poorer households, while at the same time limiting the extent to which employment incentives are worsened.
Family income supplement income thresholds have been increased in this Budget to add from €9 (for a one child family) to €111 (for a family with eight or more children) to weekly payments of almost all existing FIS recipients. This will increase the average payment, per child, to €50 a week. Research has shown that poverty is more likely to be concentrated in larger families and in this context the new FIS thresholds, while substantially increasing all payments, concentrate additional resources on larger families. This improvement, costing an estimated €32m, continues the re-focusing of thresholds towards larger families which started in Budget 2006, thereby further targeting resources at low-income households. As a result, average FIS payments in 2007 will approach €50 per week per child.
Back to school clothing and footwear allowance (BSCFA) is designed to assist recipients of social welfare, health service executive payments and similar schemes in meeting the costs of school uniforms and footwear. The allowance is not intended to meet the full cost of school clothing and footwear but to provide assistance towards these costs, where people are on low incomes.
Provisional figures for 2006 indicate that some 172,000 children benefited from this scheme in 2006 at a cost of €25.4 million. This is an increase on 2005, when some 76,200 families with 157,300 children benefited at a cost of €16.7m. This increase can be mainly attributed to improvements in income disregards introduced this year and the significant level of publicity given to this scheme in the media and through the other information services operated by my Department.
As announced in Budget 2007, the rate of payment of BSCFA is being increased by €60 per child for children aged 2 to 11 years old and €95 for children aged 12 to 22. This represents a 50% increase on the current allowance, bringing rates to €180 and €285 respectively, and will provide a considerable boost to families at a time of considerable expense in the year. The annual expenditure on the scheme is expected to exceed €38.million as a result of this measure.
The school meals programme operated by my Department provides funding towards provision of food services for disadvantaged school children through two schemes. The first is the long-standing statutory urban school meals scheme, currently operated by 36 local authorities. The Department jointly funds the food costs with these local authorities, who also manage and fund the administration of the scheme. The second is the school meals community (local projects) programme through which funding is provided by my Department to participating schools and voluntary community groups in both urban and rural areas who are running specific school meals projects, including breakfast clubs.
The purpose of funding is to assist disadvantaged children in gaining maximum benefit from educational services. Many of the schools that are currently receiving funding are also in RAPID (Revitalising Areas by Planning, Investment and Development) areas. The school meals programme has been expanding into additional schools each year. Expenditure has increased from €4.6m in 2004 to €8.2m in 2005. The expenditure outturn for the scheme for 2006 will be of the order of €13.6m. This clearly demonstrates the ongoing expansion of the scheme. In 2006, the total number of schools availing of funding (under both schemes) has increased to almost 1,400 while the numbers of pupils benefiting has increased to over 125,000. The additional funding of €3m in 2007 will allow for the current number of participating schools to be increased by over 200, benefiting an estimated 20,000 extra children.
The school meals programme makes an important contribution to ensuring that school children receive better nutrition and contributes to improved school attendance and quality of learning. The scheme also supports initiatives that target dispersed disadvantage and children with special needs. All relevant research indicates that there is a strong link between nutritional intake and cognitive ability and that inadequate nutrition impacts negatively on a child's ability to learn and benefit from education.
74 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress made to date with regard to implementation of the 2003 report of the Dáil Committee on Social and Family Affairs on carers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43122/06]
Supporting and recognising carers in our society is and has been a priority of the Government since 1997. Over that period, weekly payment rates to carers have been greatly increased, qualifying conditions for carer's allowance have been significantly eased, coverage of the scheme has been extended and new schemes such as carer's benefit and the respite care grant have been introduced and extended.
The Joint Oireachtas Committee on Social and Family Affairs Report on the position of full time carers which was published in 2003 makes fifteen recommendations. Some of these relate specifically to my Department and others relate specifically to the Department of Health and Children. The report recommended that the means test of carer's allowance should be abolished. In line with other social assistance schemes, a means test is applied to the carer's allowance so as to ensure that limited resources are directed to those in greatest need. This means test has been eased significantly over the years most notably with the disregard of spouse's earnings.
Following Budget 2006, since April, the earnings disregard for a couple has been set at €580 per week which is equivalent to gross average industrial earnings. As a result of further improvements which I announced in the Budget 2007 this disregard will increase to €640 per week for a couple from April 2007. When this increase is in place a couple with two children will be able to earn up to €36,240 and still qualify for the maximum rate of carer's allowance as well as the associated free travel and household benefits. This measure surpasses the commitment in Towards 2016 to ensure that those on average industrial earnings can continue to qualify for a full carer's allowance. Another of the major recommendations of the report was that where a person who is in receipt of a widow/er's pension and providing someone with full time care and attention, that person should be paid a half rate carer's allowance in addition to his or her pension.
In Budget 2007 I was very pleased to introduce fundamental structural reforms in this area which go beyond the Joint Committee's recommendation. In future, people in receipt of another social welfare payment who are also providing full-time care and attention to a person will be able to retain their main welfare payment and receive another payment, depending on their means, the maximum of which will be the equivalent of a half rate carer's allowance. It is estimated that approximately 18,000 carers will benefit by up to €109 per week from this measure at a cost of €56.72 million in a full year. The precise details regarding how this new arrangement will operate are being examined and will be set out in legislation early next year.
In Budget 2006 I extended the duration of Carer's Benefit from 15 to 24 months. This is in line with the report which recommended that the 15 month restriction be waived where the person continues to provide care.
The recommended extension of the respite care grant to people in receipt of a social welfare payment other than carer's allowance or benefit and who are providing someone with full time care and attention was implemented in Budget 2005. That improvement went beyond the report's recommendation in that the respite care grant was extended to all full time carers regardless of means.
With regard to the provision of information to carers, my Department provided the Carer's Association with a grant to assist them in producing an information pack for carers. I was very pleased to launch that very comprehensive pack during the summer. In addition, my Department has recently run an information campaign in relation to the income supports available for carers. This involved a week-long media campaign which included advertisements on radio, television and in the print media.
Another of the report's recommendations was that a national strategy for carers should be developed. I am delighted that one of the key Government commitments in the national partnership agreement Towards 2016 is the development of a National Carer's Strategy. This strategy, which will focus on supporting informal and family carers in the community, will be developed by the end of 2007. All relevant departments and agencies will be involved in the strategy and there will be appropriate consultation with the social partners.
I am committed to working for, and with, carers to deliver increased benefits, supports, and services for them and their families. The improvements for carers which I announced in Budget 2007 are further evidence of this commitment.
77 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has examined the possibility of paying child benefit on a weekly basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43263/06]
Child benefit is the principal means of providing support to families with children in Ireland. It is neutral vis-à-vis the employment status of the child’s parents and maximises choice for parents. Child benefit is paid monthly in advance to over 561,000 families is respect of over 1,080,000 children. At present there are no plans to move child benefit to a weekly payment. It should be noted that CB is paid in advance and if payments were made on a weekly basis the recipient would receive most payments at a later date than is now the case. A move to weekly payments would also have significant administrative implications, including additional costs.
79 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on the claim made by OPEN that children in the poorest one-parent families will gain just €6.00 per week from the Budget 2007 changes. [43247/06]
The financial support for the poorest lone parent families with, say, one child will increase by over €26 per week or 11.8% in 2007. This includes an increase of €20 per week in the basic rate of payment, plus increases in Child Benefit as well as improvements in the rates of qualified child allowance and the back-to-school clothing and footwear allowance. As I have said many times, the best route out of poverty is through employment and on foot of this year's Government discussion paper on lone parents, work is now progressing on a number of initiatives aimed at improving the employment opportunities of lone parents and parents on low income.
A sub-group of the Senior Officials Group on Social Inclusion is currently working on a plan to implement proposals for the expanded availability and range of education and training opportunities for lone parents; the extension of the National Employment Action Plan to focus on lone parents; focused provision of childcare and improved information services for lone parents. In addition, my Department is currently preparing proposals for Government for the introduction of a new social assistance payment for low income families including lone parents with young children. This new payment will have the long term aim of assisting people to achieve financial independence through supporting them to enter employment.
80 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has considered applying a similar income disregard for non-contributory State pensioners to income from self-employment, in particular from farming; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43261/06]
Last September, I established a new pension scheme, the State Pension Non-Contributory, for persons aged 66 and over. As part of this reform, I increased the basic income disregard for the purposes of the means test for non-contributory pensions to €20 per week. At the same time, I introduced incentives for those pensioners who may wish to continue in employment, or return to employment, by introducing a new disregard on earnings of €100 per week.
In Budget 2007, I was happy to be able to: deliver a pension of €200 per week as promised in the Government commitment; build on the reforms I introduced last year by increasing the basic means disregard to €30 per week; and increase the earnings disregard to €200 per week. These measures will benefit approximately 26,000 pensioners, including many farmers, from January 5 next. As a consequence, in addition to the €18 increase in non-contributory personal rate a further increase of up to €10 per week will apply while the Qualified Adult rate will be further increased by up to €6.60 per week. These increases are on top of the €18 per week provided for non-contributory pensioners generally.
It should also be noted that special arrangements also apply for pensioner farmers who participate in the REPS and SACS schemes. The first €2,540 of all income from these schemes is not assessable for means test purposes and 50% of any balance is assessed. Any expenses necessarily incurred to participate in these schemes are also disregarded.
I am satisfied that the measures introduced in Budget 2007 will ensure that the living standards of all non-contributory pensioners, including farmer pensioners, are greatly enhanced and I have no proposals to introduce further changes at this time.
88 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the activities envisaged under the eGovernment related project measure listed in the Estimates 2007 which represents a 207% increase in expenditure in this area. [43243/06]
My Department is responsible for a number of technology-related projects which are designed to improve the delivery of social welfare services but which also have a wider application and relevance for the delivery of services by other public service agencies in the context of the wider eGovernment programme. In this context and to deal with this work programme as efficiently as possible, a number of key related ICT programmes have been identified for investment over the next few years. These programmes are: The Customer Object project; The Public Service Identity (PSI) services projects; and The Standard Authentication Framework Environment (SAFE) projects.
The ultimate aim of these programmes is to improve the service my Department provides to its customers and to support similar initiatives by other Departments.
My Department is engaged in a strategic programme which involves moving from individual scheme based systems to a more customer-centric approach. This includes examining our customers' future needs in the context of improving service delivery and involves supporting improved access to the Department's services, by either proactively contacting customer for example, when they are coming up to pension age. It also opens up opportunities to use other contact channels such as the phone or online channels.
The Customer Object project will see the redevelopment of the Department's Central Records System and other systems and their migration from the current ICT platform to a new platform. It is planned to support business improvements in the areas of customer registration and claim processing with these technical enhancements. To illustrate the potential of this programme, early work in this area resulted in the automation of the child benefit application process, eliminating the need for multiple form-filling and visits to offices.
The purpose of the PSI Services project is to make a subset of relevant customer related information available to appropriately authorised agencies. Among the advantages to the customer of this change is a reduced need to supply information repeatedly when seeking public services, while advantages to the agencies concerned include increased certainty regarding the identity of the person they are dealing with. The initial project, delivered through Reach, underpins the use of the PPS Number for the PAYE On-line initiative introduced earlier this year by the Revenue Commissioners. It is proposed to carry out further work to make similar facilities securely available to other agencies.
My Department is also responsible for the issue of the Public Service Card. It is working with the Department of Finance to develop a framework for the deployment of public service cards. This programme of work is known as SAFE (Standard Authentication Framework Environment). It is planned to issue new cards to replace the existing Social Welfare Card, commencing in late 2007, primarily to beneficiaries of the free travel scheme. The new card will include a number of improvements and better security features.
90 Mr. Andrews asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding his campaign against child poverty; the impact of the Budget 2007 measures on this campaign; the nature of especially targeted measures in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43238/06]
The Government is determined to substantially reduce child poverty — the evidence of this is in last week's Budget in which I announced a range of measures costing over €240 million to benefit children and families. These measures include combining three rates of Child Dependant Allowance payments into a new single high rate Qualified Child Allowance of €22 per week that will benefit over 340,000 children of families on welfare. I am also increasing the rate of Child Benefit by €10 per week. This increase will apply to all children benefiting over 560,000 families in respect of approximately 1,134,000 children, and will be effective from April 2007.
The Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance provides additional income support for the poorest families at a particularly difficult time of the year. With this in mind, I am increasing the allowance by €60 for children aged 2 to 11, and by €95 for children aged 12 to 22, bringing the rates of payment to €180 and €285 respectively. I have also made provision for additional funding of €3 million to extend the School Meals Programme.
Other budgetary measures, such as the €20 per week increase in the lowest social welfare rate to €185.80 and increases in the earnings thresholds for One Parent Family Payment and Family Income Supplement, will also indirectly benefit children living in poorer households. The package of measures for children and families in Budget 2006 is in addition to recent initiatives such as the new €1,000 a year early childcare supplement for all children under 6 years and the creation of additional childcare places.
In addition to these provisions, preparation of a new National Action Plan for Social Inclusion is currently being coordinated by the Office for Social Inclusion in my Department for launch early in the New Year. Building on the social inclusion provisions in the partnership agreement, Towards 2016, the Plan will adopt a lifecycle approach by assessing the risks which individuals face at each stage of the life cycle and the supports they need to effectively meet these risks. The groups focused on using this approach are Children, People of Working Age, Older People and People with Disabilities. This strategic framework is also being designed to create more coherent and integrated structures that will greatly assist in achieving more effective implementation of the plan. It is also expected to facilitate better and more effective reporting and monitoring across the spectrum of government activity in the area of social inclusion. Ending child poverty remains a key priority for this Government and for me personally as Minister for Social and Family Affairs.
92 Mr. Noonan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of cases of supplementary welfare allowance rent supplement paid out in each of the respective years from 2002 and to date in 2006; the amount paid out in each of these years respectively; the average weekly payment made; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43298/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. The purpose of the scheme is to provide short-term income support, in the form of a weekly or monthly payment, to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source.
The number of tenants benefiting from rent supplementation under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme has increased by over 10% since 2002. At the end of 2005 there were just over 60,000 people in receipt of a supplement, at an annual expenditure of just under €370m. Average weekly payment in 2002 was €94.88 increasing to €101.77 in 2005. At the end of November 2006, the number of beneficiaries has reduced to 59,807 with the average weekly payment at €103.13. Details of the number of recipients and expenditure for each of the respective years 2002 to 2006 are provided in the attached tabular statement.
The scheme has developed beyond the original objective of providing short-term assistance with accommodation. A significant number of people have now come to rely on rent supplementation for extended periods, including people on local authority housing lists. For this reason, the scheme has to be viewed in the context of overall housing policy, particularly in the case of long-term claimants.
In response to this situation, the Government has introduced new rental assistance arrangements including the rental accommodation scheme (RAS) giving local authorities specific responsibility for meeting the longer-term housing needs of people receiving rent supplement for 18 months or more, on a phased implementation basis. When fully operational, local authorities will meet the housing needs of these individuals through a range of approaches including the traditional range of social housing options, the voluntary housing sector and, in particular, a new public/private partnership type rental accommodation scheme.
The Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has indicated that at the end of November 2006 almost 2,600 tenants have been accommodated under the Rental Accommodation Scheme and a further 1,900 families accommodated in Social Housing. It is projected that by the end of 2006, between 4,500 and 5,000 tenants will have transferred from rent supplement to accommodation provided by local authorities either through the RAS or some other type of social housing, rising to 10,000 by the end of 2007.
|
Year |
Recipients |
Annual Expenditure |
Average Weekly Supplement |
% paid weekly |
Average Monthly Supplement |
% paid monthly |
|
€m |
||||||
|
2002 |
54,213 |
252.34 |
94.88 |
78 |
651.65 |
22 |
|
2003 |
59,976 |
331.47 |
97.07 |
75 |
715.96 |
25 |
|
2004 |
57,874 |
353.76 |
100.00 |
72 |
752.91 |
28 |
|
2005 |
60,176 |
368.70 |
101.77 |
71 |
768.47 |
29 |
|
1/12/06 |
59,807 |
*323.66 |
103.13 |
71 |
768.25 |
29 |
* End October 2006.
94 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number benefiting from the fuel allowance; the categories of people entitled to it; the effect of electricity and gas price rises in the context of household benefits; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43157/06]
100 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has given consideration to extending the duration of payment of the fuel allowance by two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43295/06]
108 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of old age pensioners out of the total number who receive the fuel allowance. [43254/06]
115 Mr. Kelly asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people that qualify for the fuel allowance; the way qualification is determined; the changes that have been made to the fuel allowance recently; their expected impact; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43158/06]
117 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people who have been refused the fuel allowance due to a family member residing with them, each year for the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43300/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 94, 100, 108, 115 and 117 together.
The national fuel scheme assists householders on long-term social welfare or health service executive (HSE) payments with meeting the cost of their heating needs during the heating season. Fuel allowances are paid for 29 weeks from end-September to mid-April. The allowance represents a contribution towards a person's normal heating expenses. It is not intended to meet those costs in full. Improvements to the fuel allowance in recent years include an easing of the means test, extending the duration of payment from 26 to 29 weeks and a doubling of the rate of payment in the last two budgets. In Budget 2007, I have provided for an increase in the rate of fuel allowance of €4 from €14 to €18 (€21.90 in designated smokeless areas) and I have also increased the income threshold for eligibility to fuel allowance by €49 from €51 to €100 above the state pension (contributory) rate.
Some 274,000 people will benefit in 2006 at an estimated annual cost €125m. As a consequence of the increase in rate announced in the recent budget, annual expenditure on the scheme in 2007 will increase by €31.8m to €156.9m. Just over 89,500 of the 274,000 people in receipt of fuel allowance are recipients of a state pension contributory or non-contributory scheme. Statistics are not available on the number of fuel allowance applications refused on the basis of a non-qualifying family member residing with the claimant.
The main conditions that apply to the fuel allowance scheme are that a person must be in receipt of a qualifying payment, satisfy a means test and must either be living alone or only with a qualifying dependant. The household composition and means test rules for fuel allowance scheme qualifying purposes is to ascertain the ability of applicant households to meet their normal heating requirements out of their own resources and to ensure that the maximum amount of support is targeted at those most in need of the fuel allowance support.
People who already qualify for means-tested pensions or allowances such as state pension (non-contributory), long-term jobseeker's assistance or one-parent family payment do not have to undergo a further means test to qualify for fuel allowance. The majority of people who receive fuel allowances qualify because they satisfy the relevant means test for their primary weekly payment. In the case of contributory pensions such as state pension (contributory), state pension (transition) and invalidity pensions, which are not means tested, from January 2007 a person may have a combined household income of up to €100 per week, over and above the maximum state pension (contributory) rate (or savings/investments of up to €58,000) and still qualify for fuel allowance. The fuel allowance income limits increase each season in line with the increases in the state pension (contributory) rate.
Some 340,000 pensioner and other households qualify for electricity or gas allowances through the household benefits package, payable towards their heating, light and cooking costs throughout the year, at an overall cost of €119 million in 2006. From 1 January 2007 the Electricity Allowance is being increased from 1,800 units to 2,400 units including normal standing charges and VAT with a pro-rata increase applied on the gas effective from October 2006. In effect, the cash value of these allowances was set at €516 per annum from October 2006 for gas customers and from January 2007 for electricity customers. An additional annual increase of €33 will also be applied to those ESB customers who pay the higher rate rural standing charges, bringing the total cash value of the allowance in their case to €549 per annum.
Following the latest downward price adjustment for electricity announced by CER on 4 December 2006, I have decided to maintain the value of the allowances at €516 per annum and €549 for rural electricity customers which will further increase the value of the allowance to customers through the provision of additional units for the same price outlay. These improvements represent an immediate response by the Government to concerns arising regarding increases in energy costs experienced during the year.
The increase in the rate of fuel allowance to €18 per week as announced as part of Budget 2007 will provide over 274,000 people currently entitled to the allowance with additional help towards meeting their heating costs. The increase in the income threshold to €100 above the maximum state pension (contributory) will allow more people to qualify for fuel allowance. Up to 8,000 additional people are expected to qualify for fuel allowance as a result. Fuel allowances are incorporated in the recipient's weekly social welfare payment. The Government's objective is to ensure that the recipient's total weekly income, including the fuel allowance, is sufficient to meet all of their income needs, including heating costs.
Budget resources are concentrated on providing significant real increases over and above inflation each year in all primary social welfare pension, benefit and assistance rates. The increases of €16 and €18 per week in the rates of payment for contributory and non-contributory pensions respectively announced in the recent budget is a continuation of this policy. (This is a more costly approach than increasing fuel allowances as the increase is paid for the full year and not just for the 29 weeks of the winter heating season). This approach delivers a good outcome for pensioners and others by substantially increasing their income in real terms over the whole year, to better assist them in meeting their normal basic living costs, including heating. Income maintenance measures for social welfare recipients are significant with rates of payments increased in the context of each budget strategy.
At the proposed 2007 fuel allowance rate of €18, an increase of two weeks, four weeks and eight weeks in the duration of the fuel season would cost an extra €10.8m, €21.6 and €43.2m per annum respectively. I will continue to monitor the scheme to ensure it reaches those most in need.
95 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the demand for family mediation services; if he has satisfied himself that this demand will continue to be met; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43274/06]
The Family Support Agency has responsibility for the Family Mediation Service, a free, professional and confidential service for couples, married and non-married, who have decided to separate or divorce and who together want to negotiate the terms of their separation or divorce with the help of a trained mediator. Family mediation assists separating couples to look at the resources and options open to them and to reach an agreement that meets the interests of both and the interests of their children.
The Family Mediation Service has a total of sixteen centres nationally. There are full-time Family Mediation Service centres in Cork, Galway, Limerick and Earlsfort Terrace in Dublin and part-time Family Mediation Service centres in Athlone, Castlebar, Dundalk, Letterkenny, Portlaoise, Sligo, Tralee, Waterford, Wexford and Blanchardstown, Marino and Tallaght in Dublin. There are 26 professionally trained mediators working for the service all accredited by the Mediators Institute Ireland, the professional accrediting body for mediators in Ireland.
Demand for the Family Mediation Service has always been strong and the expansion of the Service from 2 offices in 1997 to its present number of 16 reflects this Government's commitment to provide a nationwide service. Up to the end of November 2006, the Family Mediation Service has helped 1,480 couples this year. The total number helped in 2005 was 1,430.
This year, I opened two new centres, one in Letterkenny to enhance accessibility to the service in the North West and one in Portlaoise to similarly expand the service in the Midlands. In addition, the Service has recently opened a new pilot part-time office in Ballymun to deal with an increased demand in that particular area. The Service has also increased the opening hours in a number of the part-time centres around the country in order to continue to meet demand and reduce waiting times.
I am pleased that funding for the Family Mediation Service in 2007 will be increased to €3.9 million from €3.7 million this year. This increase will help the Service to continue to meet its demand.
101 Mr. Sherlock asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the recent study from the Combat Poverty Agency which shows that the increasing levels of indirect taxation here are having a disproportionate effect on persons on lower incomes; his plans to provide additional supports through the welfare system to assist families to cope with such extra pressures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43129/06]
Earlier this year, I welcomed the publication by the Combat Poverty Agency of its report "The Distributional Impact of Ireland's Indirect Tax System" and the associated policy statement "Promoting Equity in Ireland's Tax System". The report addressed whether and to what extent the Irish system of indirect taxation, namely VAT and excise duties, is regressive. The report outlines that over the period 2000 to 2005, the share of total Current Exchequer Revenues represented by VAT and excises duties combined has remained unchanged at 44.5%.
The authors concluded that the indirect tax system appears to be regressive in the sense that households in the lowest decile pay a higher proportion of their income in indirect taxes relative to households in the higher deciles. However, they also noted that the indirect tax system includes some elements of progressivity such as low tax rates on food and fuel and zero tax rates on children's clothes and footwear. They also pointed out that changes to some tax elements could have negative effects elsewhere. For example, lowering taxes on drink and tobacco could have a negative health impact. In conclusion, the authors do not recommend adjustments to indirect taxes.
Over the period since 1997, the Government has greatly increased the levels of income support provided through the social welfare system and this was again evident in the increases announced last week as part of Budget 2007. In this Budget, the personal and qualified adult rates of payment were increased by unprecedented amounts. The lowest rates of social welfare payments were increased by €20 per week to €185.80, or by 12.1%. This increase is nearly 3 times the expected rate of inflation next year and, therefore, improves and enhances the living standards of all recipients.
Since 1997, the lowest rates of welfare payments have increased by almost 117%, well ahead of the 53% accumulated inflation over that period. In addition, the Budget included a child support package of nearly €244 million which involved major improvements for low-income families and for single parent families. We now have delivered, on time and as promised, on our commitments in the Programme for Government by bringing the basic State Pension to €200 a week and realising the 2007 target for the lowest social welfare rates. The 2007 Budget package is a strong statement of this Government's commitment to the elderly, children and all those who, for one reason or another, are more vulnerable in our society.
103 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has considered paying family income supplement at the 70% differential; the estimated cost of same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43265/06]
Family income supplement is designed to provide support for people on low earnings with child dependants and provide the incentive for them to remain in, or take up, employment. Recent improvements to family income supplement include the change of assessment from a gross income basis to net income, the increase to €20 per week in the minimum payment and, in Budget 2007, the continued re-focusing of income thresholds to include additional gains for larger families.
The improved income thresholds which I announced in Budget 2007 will result in increased average weekly payments for most FIS recipients from €76 (for a one child family) to €392 (for a family with eight or more children), and will also make an estimated 5,600 additional families eligible for a full FIS payment. This will increase the average payment, per child, to €50 a week. The cost of this measure is estimated at €32 million per annum, while the additional cost of paying family income supplement at the 70% differential in a full year is estimated at some €23 million.
104 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he has satisfied himself with the State pension increase to €200 as recently announced in Budget 2007, in view of the fact that the poverty line is currently at €203.55 and some 37% of pensioners are relying on the State pension. [43240/06]
Since taking office this Government has made the needs of older people a priority with the inclusion of several commitments in the Programme for Government aimed specifically at the group. I am very pleased to say that we have delivered on the commitment to increase the state pension to €200 per week by 2007. In addition, the State pension (contributory) has been increased by €16 per week to €209.30 per week. Pension increases have been well ahead of inflation thus ensuring that not only is the real value of pensions maintained but that they are significantly improved in real terms. For instance, since 1996, and including the budget increases, pensions have increased by almost 119%, or about 57% in real terms, faster than both price and wages growth over the period.
The State pension (non-contributory) is a social assistance scheme which, in common with all other such schemes, features a means test to ensure that resources committed to social assistance payments are used to provide support to and improve the position of those who are most in need. The new enhanced State pension (non-contributory) for those over 66 years which I introduced at the end of September, features significant improvements in the means test and an incentive of €100 per week of earnings disregarded for pensioners who may wish to earn extra income to continue in employment. I was happy to be able to build on these improvements in last week's Budget by increasing the basic means disregard to €30 per week, and at the same time enhancing the employment incentives by increasing the earnings disregard to €200 per week. Both of these disregards are doubled for pensioner couples.
Other measures of benefit to older people include last years' increase in the over 80 allowance of €3.60 per week, bringing it to €10 per week and this years' increase in the fuel allowance of €4 per week, bringing the allowance to €18 per week. This represents a doubling of the fuel allowance in the last two years. The household benefits package, which comprises telephone allowance, electricity/natural gas allowance and free TV licence is available to people living in the State aged 66 to 69 years subject to certain conditions, and to over 70's. The electricity/natural gas allowance is of immense benefit to older people who have in general greater heating requirements. As already announced, the value of the natural gas allowance has been increased and the number of free units of electricity will increase by 600 units a year to 2,400 units.
The additional supports, combined with the unprecedented increases in pension rates demonstrate that the needs of older people continue to be a priority for this Government. I will continue to look for opportunities to make further progress on improving the level of supports we provide for our older people.
107 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the measure he will take to recognise and support carers under the age of 18; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43290/06]
I have examined "Caring Before Their Time? Research and Policy Perspectives on Young Carers" by Barnardos and The Children's Research Centre, which was published in September 2004. I was particularly struck by the fact that, of the estimated 3,000 young carers who are providing some care, there are over 300 carers between the ages of 15 and 17 years of age who are providing full-time care. It is clear that this group needs appropriate supports.
I recognise that special help, advice and support is essential for young carers who are often caring for a parent and, in particular, that services must be put in place to support the household and to ensure that young carers remain at school. The Barnardos report recommends that policy relating to young carers should be a matter for the Department of Health and Children with services being delivered by the Health Service Executive. These include the services of home helps, public health nurses and home care packages generally. The report considers that further research should be undertaken on numbers of young carers, the supports available to them, their needs and the impact of their caring role on their education and general development.
I am pleased that the national partnership agreement "Towards 2016" commits the Government to undertaking a study (with the involvement of relevant Departments) of the extent to which children undertake inappropriate care roles in order to establish the extent and degree to which this issue arises and the levels of impact it has on the lives of children concerned. Based on the outcome of this study and an analysis of the issues identified, a programme of in-home supports will be developed to alleviate specific problem areas identified for children.
The report of the Long-Term Care working group is being considered by the Government. This Group was established by the Minister for Health and Children and myself in January 2005 to identify the policy options for a financially sustainable system of long-term care. It comprises senior officials from the Departments of Finance, Health and Children and my own Department. My officials have brought the issue of young carers to the attention of the working group.
Supports for carers from my own Department include the respite care grant and the carers's allowance. The respite care grant, which is an annual payment for carers who look after certain people in need of full-time care and attention, is payable from age 16. The payment is made regardless of the carer's means but it is subject to certain qualifying conditions. The grant from will increase from €1,200 to €1,500 per year from June 2007. Carer's allowance, which provides income support to people who are providing certain older people or people with a disability with full time care and attention and whose incomes fall below a certain limit, is payable from age 18.
I am always prepared to consider changes to existing arrangements where these are for the benefit of recipients and financially sustainable within the resources available to me. I will continue to strive to bring forward proposals that recognise the valued and valuable contribution of all carers in a tangible way.
109 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will accept the recommendation of the Law Reform Commission that same sex cohabitants should be treated in the same way as opposite sex cohabitants for social welfare payments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43119/06]
Two important pieces of work have recently been completed regarding different types of partner relationships and how they should be treated and recognised in Irish society. The first report an "Options Paper, presented by the Working Group on Domestic Partnership" to the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, focuses on different types of cohabiting relationships, both same and opposite sex and presents a range of options with regard to giving legal recognition to these relationships. Officials from my Department contributed to the work of this Group. The second report — the "Report of the Law Reform Commission on the Rights and Duties of Cohabitants" makes substantial recommendations for reform of the law concerning cohabitants including both opposite sex or same sex couples who live together.
These reports come at a time of wide public debate on the question of according legal status to cohabitants generally and same sex couples in particular and will contribute to the informed debate on these important topics. In addition my own Department is currently carrying out a technical review of the entire social welfare code to examine its compatibility with the Equal Status Act 2000 (as amended). The review will examine the schemes and services provided for both in social welfare legislation and the administrative schemes operated by the Department. It will identify any instances of direct or indirect discrimination, on any of the nine grounds under the Act, including: gender, sexual orientation, marital status and family status that are not justified by a legitimate social policy objective or where the means of achieving that objective are either unnecessary or inappropriate. This work, together with the reports I have referred to, will contribute to informed planning and policy making to ensure that the social welfare system reflects the needs and expectations of citizens and is equitable in meeting those needs.
112 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people in receipt of a social welfare payment due to being unable to obtain employment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43167/06]
There were 148,529 people on the Live Register at end-November 2006, which comprised 88,583 males and 59, 946 females. There were 56,343 claiming Jobseekers Benefit, 82,713 claiming Jobseekers Allowance and other registrants amounting to 9,473. This is the lowest November Live Register since November 2001, when it was 147,100. The Live Register stood at 150,073 at end-November 2005, so it can be seen that there has been a reduction of 1,544 in the year.
My Department through its employment support and other services has assisted many people away from long-term unemployment and back into the workforce. The primary role of my Department's locally based facilitators is to assist the unemployed and other welfare dependants back to work, training or further education by providing them on an individual basis with assistance to access the necessary programmes or supports which their circumstances demand. Facilitators have access to some additional services, such as the special projects and family services funds which provide funding for specialised training and supports for those who are distant from the labour market and who need additional help in preparing them for further training and employment. The back to work allowance was introduced in September 1993 as part of my Department's programme of initiatives designed to assist the long term unemployed to return to the active labour force.
My Department also administers the back to education allowance or BTEA which is a second chance education opportunities scheme designed to encourage and facilitate people on certain social welfare payments to improve their skills and qualifications and, therefore, their prospects of returning to the active work force. In the recent budget I announced that I would extend immediate entitlement to BTEA to people who have been made redundant and who have an entitlement to statutory redundancy payments and to a social welfare payment. They will have an immediate access to BTEA to prevent long term dependency on unemployment payments. In addition, under the Employment Action Plan (EAP), customers, aged 18 to 64 years, who are approaching 3 months on the Live Register, are systematically referred to FÁS for guidance, intervention or placement.
The services provided by my Department to assist the unemployed, particularly their continued relevance and flexibility, are under constant review. I am particularly interested in advancing measures that blend activation with supports and that make the transition from welfare to work as seamless as possible.
116 Mr. English asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the progress to date in reaching the target of 100 family resource centres here by the end of 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43272/06]
The administration of the Family and Community Services Resource Centre (FRC) Programme is one of the key functions of the Family Support Agency. The FRC programme provides financial assistance to projects to assist with the staffing and equipping of local resource centres which provide a focal point for community development activities. The emphasis in the projects is on the involvement of local communities in developing approaches to tackle the problems they face and on creating successful partnerships between the voluntary and statutory agencies in the areas concerned. The services provided and activities supported by the resource centres are designed to meet the needs of the local community and include the provision of training, information, advice and support to target groups and families in the area; the provision of education courses, childcare facilities to those attending such courses and the running of after-school clubs.
Family Resource Centres are an example of the kind of community initiative which the Government is keen to develop, focusing as they do on family support and social inclusion. For this reason I am pleased to say that the target set by the Government under the 2000-2006 National Development Plan of including 100 Family Resource Centres in the FRC Programme nationwide by the end of 2006 has been delivered on. There are currently 96 centres in receipt of core funding by the Family Support Agency with a further 4 having received approval to join the Programme. Funding under the Programme has increased substantially from €317,500 in 1994 to over €12.9 million in 2006.
118 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the measures he will take to ensure that original copies of speeding offences are produced and maintained in order that speeding charges are executed in full compliance with judicial procedure; and the steps he has taken to ensure that the operation of the new privatised speeding cameras will meet the procedural requirements of the courts. [43468/06]
I have requested a Garda report in relation to this matter and I will contact the Deputy again when the report is to hand.
119 Mr. Kehoe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the cost of advertising and promoting the recent gun amnesty; his views on whether it represented good value for money as so few weapons were handed in; if his attention has been drawn to a fact that a similar Swedish gun amnesty yielded over 17,000 guns; if he plans to have a further gun amnesty; if so, the lessons he has learnt from the recent amnesty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43375/06]
A total of €331,608.26 (inclusive of VAT) was spent on advertising and promoting the recent Weapons Amnesty. I am satisfied that the Amnesty, which resulted in the surrender of 1,002 weapons, has been a success and fully achieved its aims.
The purpose of the amnesty was to afford people an opportunity to hand in illegally held weapons at their local Garda Station before the introduction of new more stringent sentences for firearms offences which I provided for in the Criminal Justice Act, 2006. I was never of the view that large numbers of hardened criminals were going to hand over their weapons. Such criminals can only be dealt with by applying the full rigour of the law; they are and will continue to be pursued relentlessly and brought to justice. However, I did believe that there were people who had unlicensed guns and offensive weapons in their homes, who would have found it difficult to come forward or to admit that they had such weapons, and that an amnesty would afford them an opportunity to surrender their weapons safely before the introduction of the new minimum mandatory sentences provided for under the 2006 Act. I was glad to see so many people avail of the opportunity before I introduced the minimum mandatory sentences provisions on 1st November, 2006.
One cannot draw a valid comparison between the recent Amnesty here and the Swedish Amnesty in 1993. Under the Swedish Amnesty persons were allowed to hand in illegally held guns anonymously and no questions were asked, neither were those surrendering weapons required to present any form of identification or asked for their names. The basis of our Amnesty, and one which all parties agreed with in the course of the passage of the Criminal Justice Act, 2006 through the Oireachtas, was that persons would be required to give their name and address when surrendering weapons, that the weapons surrendered would be forensically tested and where a surrendered weapon was found to have been used in the commission of a crime both the weapon and forensic evidence could be used in evidence in any subsequent proceedings. To provide otherwise would, in my view, allow for the possibility that criminals would avail of the Amnesty to "dump" weapons used in the commission of crime thus making it more difficult to secure prosecutions in some cases.
120 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the mechanism available to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare to take custody of their sister and take care of her here. [43376/06]
The person referred to by the Deputy has sought to enter the State to be reunited with family members. She had previously been granted a visit visa and adhered fully to the conditions of that visa. However, the reasons to enter the State on this occasion did not meet with current criteria and the application was refused. The person in question may of course appeal this decision and any supporting documentation will be fully examined by my Department. All appeals must be received within two months of the decision to refuse.
121 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if, in view of the disclosure of confidential information relating to a tragic case which was recently leaked and published (details provided) despite many years of official refusal to furnish the family concerned with similar information, he will at this stage reverse the policy of the continued refusal to fully investigate the murder of the unarmed Garda on 3 April 1970; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43396/06]
I am aware of the publication in question, the relevant parts of which either reiterate claims previously aired in the public domain or recount information already provided to the family of the unarmed Garda who was murdered in 1970. It is also the case that this appalling murder was fully investigated by the Garda Síochána at the time. Arising from this investigation, three persons were prosecuted, and they were subsequently acquitted by the Courts. I facilitated a briefing of a representative of the family and his legal adviser in this matter by the Garda Síochána in particular by a leading member of the investigation team who shares my view the matter was fully investigated by the Gardaí at the time and that no new evidence is likely to become available.
I am aware of and sympathise with the continuing concerns of the family. However, I remain unconvinced that any further practical step is open to me which would be likely to alter the outcome in this case.
122 Mr. Gogarty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made on a family reunification application for a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43424/06]
The person in question made a Family Reunification application on behalf of his wife and child in January 2006.The application was forwarded to the Refugee Applications Commissioner for investigation as required under Section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996. This investigation is completed and the Commissioner has forwarded a report to my Department. This application will be considered by my Department and a decision will issue in due course.
123 Mr. Sargent asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will publish the guidelines, instructions or guidance that are given to Gardaí regarding dealing with individuals who require medical attention. [43425/06]
125 Mr. Sargent asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will publish details of guidance given to Gardaí regarding the use of marked or unmarked Garda cars for conveying injured individuals to a hospital to receive medical attention. [43429/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 123 and 125 together.
I am informed by the Garda authorities that the carriage of civilian passengers in official Garda vehicles (marked or unmarked) is prohibited except in certain specific circumstances which include conveyance of persons where necessary for the preservation of life. It is also the case that Regulations relating to the treatment of persons in custody make provision for individuals who require medical attention.
I am further informed that the Garda Síochána Code covers all areas of Garda duties including operational, security and administrative duties. All members of An Garda Síochána are issued with a personal copy of the Code, which is retained by the member for the duration of his/her service. The Garda Code is a confidential publication. The Garda Commissioner is of the view that it is necessary that confidentiality be maintained in respect of the Code in order to maintain the operational effectiveness of An Garda Síochána.
124 Mr. Sargent asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the training provided to Gardaí in medical or paramedical practices or first aid. [43428/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities, who are responsible for the detailed allocation of resources, including personnel, that Student Gardaí at the Garda College receive the following instruction in First Aid:
Phase I — All Student Gardaí received up to twenty (20) hours of First Aid instruction.
Phase III — Student Gardaí are given a refresher training of four (4) hours.
The instruction is provided by staff that are qualified by the National Ambulance Training School as Occupational First Aid Instructors. During Phase I and Phase III, Student Gardaí are given instruction and tested on the following:
(a) Lay rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (C.P.R.)
(b) Haemorrhage Control
(c) Crush & Spinal Injury
Student Gardaí also receive instruction in dealing with other medical emergencies, which include the following:
(a) Heart Attack
(b) Shock
(c) Burns
(d) Fractures
(e) Loss of consciousness
(f) Diabetes, Asthma, Epilepsy.
126 Mr. Broughan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the memorandum prepared by a person (details supplied) on behalf of the Stardust Relatives and Victims Committee. [43442/06]
I can advise the Deputy that a response to the Stardust Relatives and Victims Committee is imminent.
127 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he is satisfied with penalty points and fines imposed on trucks that break the three tonne limit; his views on revising same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43443/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that the fine for breaching a three tonne limit is €80. Legislation in respect of Road Traffic Offences is the responsibility of my colleague the Minister for Transport. Provision is made in the Road Traffic Act 2002 for inclusion of offences contrary to Section 12 of the Road Traffic Act 1961 in the fixed charge penalty point system. The Minister for Transport will be giving consideration to the rolling out of this and other penalty point offences in due course. I am further informed that Garda management is satisfied with the level of enforcement of this restriction.
128 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will furnish the crime statistics for the Bantry Garda district for the years 2000 to 2005 respectively in view of the fact that such statistics are not separately contained in the Garda annual reports. [43445/06]
Headline crime statistics for the years 2000 to 2005 for the Garda Division of Cork West, which includes the Garda District of Bantry, are contained in the relevant Garda Annual Reports, copies of which are available in the Oireachtas Library. Headline crime statistics have not yet been published in the manner requested by the Deputy.
Following the submission to me in 2004 of a report and recommendations by an expert group on crime statistics, I decided that the compilation, production and publication of crime statistics should be taken over by the Central Statistics Office, as the national statistical agency, from the Garda Síochána. The Garda Síochána Act, 2005 consequently makes provision for this and the CSO established a dedicated Unit for this purpose. Following the setting up of the necessary technical systems and auditing of the data from which the statistics are compiled, I am pleased to note that the CSO are now compiling and publishing criminal statistics and have published the figures for the third quarter of this year.
I understand that the CSO is examining how the crime statistics published might be expanded and made more comprehensive.
129 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of former prisoners who are on early release, temporary release, or are otherwise out on licence, or are not in the custody of the Prison Service as of 1 December 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43446/06]
As of 1st December 2006, I can inform the Deputy that the figures at unlock indicated that there were 149 persons on temporary release with an additional 55 life sentence prisoners on long term release. This compares with a total figure of 552 persons on temporary release on 9 December 1996.
130 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of bench warrants which are presently outstanding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43447/06]
Under the provisions of the Courts Service Act 1998, it is a function of the Court Service to provide appropriate information on the courts. I have therefore arranged to have the matter raised by the Deputy referred to the Courts Service, which has informed me that it will reply directly to the Deputy.
131 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of speed cameras which are functioning and are actively being operated here as of 1 December 2006; the number of such cameras that are not functioning or are otherwise not being operated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43449/06]
I have requested a Garda report in relation to this matter and I will contact the Deputy again when the report is to hand.
132 Mr. Stagg asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí in each Garda Division on 31 December 1997 and 30 November 2006. [43473/06]
I have been informed by the Garda authorities, who are responsible for the detailed allocation of resources, including personnel, that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána increased to a record 13,000 on Thursday, 16 November, 2006, following the attestation of 299 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 (all ranks) as at 30 June, 1997 and represents an increase of 2,298 (or 21.5%) in the personnel strength of the Force during that period. The induction of 280 new Garda recruits to the Garda College on 6 November, 2006 resulted in a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,137. The Garda Budget now stands at €1.3 billion, a 13% increase on 2005 and an 85% increase since 1997 in real terms. I have been further informed by the Garda authorities that the personnel strength of each Garda Division as at 31 December, 1997 and as at 30 November, 2006 was as set out in the table:
|
Division |
31/12/97 |
30/11/06 |
|
D.M.R. South Central |
707 |
741 |
|
D.M.R. North Central |
585 |
673 |
|
D.M.R. South |
471 |
595 |
|
D.M.R. North |
577 |
638 |
|
D.M.R. West |
513 |
720 |
|
D.M.R. East |
546 |
598 |
|
Louth/Meath |
498 |
549 |
|
Carlow/Kildare |
281 |
371 |
|
Laois/Offaly |
274 |
290 |
|
Longford/Westmeath |
232 |
273 |
|
Wexford/Wicklow |
269 |
346 |
|
Waterford/Kilkenny |
306 |
380 |
|
Tipperary |
297 |
340 |
|
Cork City |
540 |
639 |
|
Cork North |
209 |
261 |
|
Cork West |
223 |
263 |
|
Kerry |
230 |
296 |
|
Limerick |
423 |
529 |
|
Clare |
219 |
329 |
|
Galway West |
310 |
404 |
|
Roscommon/Galway East |
231 |
261 |
|
Mayo |
258 |
280 |
|
Sligo/Leitrim |
257 |
290 |
|
Donegal |
440 |
444 |
|
Cavan/Monaghan |
371 |
383 |
I should add that the current recruitment drive to increase the strength of the Garda Síochána to 14,000 members, in line with the commitment in the Agreed Programme for Government, is fully on target. A total of 1,125 recruits were inducted to the Garda Training College in 2005. The first four groups of newly attested Gardaí under this accelerated recruitment programme came on stream in March, June, September and November of this year. A further 1,114 were inducted to the Garda Training College this year and further tranches of approximately 275 newly attested Gardaí will follow every 90 days hereafter until the programme is complete. The Garda Commissioner will now be drawing up plans on how best to distribute and manage these additional resources.
133 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision on family reunification will be made in relation to a person (details supplied) in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43507/06]
The person in question made a Family Reunification application on behalf of his family members in March 2006. The application was forwarded to the Refugee Applications Commissioner for investigation as required under Section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996. This investigation is completed and the Commissioner has forwarded a report to my Department. This application will be considered by my Department and a decision will issue in due course.
134 Mr. Morgan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the general policy issue that underpinned the refusal to grant a person (details supplied) a visa; and if he will review the recommendation not to grant a visa to the person in view of the fact that they will only be here for five months and has sworn an affidavit outlining their intentions to return to Bangladesh and has fulfilled all financial requirements. [43521/06]
The application referred to by the Deputy was received in the Dublin Visa Office on 10th November, 2006. The decision of the Visa Officer to refuse the application was taken on 27th November, 2006. The application was refused on the grounds that it is not the general policy to permit any person, whether related or not, to join or visit any person who is in the State on a study visa. The applicant failed to demonstrate any compelling grounds as to why an exception to this policy should be made. It is open to the applicant to appeal the refusal decision. Comprehensive guidelines on making an appeal can be found on my Department's website (www.justice.ie). All appeals must be made within two months of the decision to refuse.
135 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 273 of 27 September 2006, if he will report on the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43524/06]
136 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 1055 of 29 September 2004, if he will report on the issue; his plans to introduce a family law Bill; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43525/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 135 and 136 together.
In the matter of a new system for civil legal costs, I wish to inform the Deputy that the Implementation Advisory Group recently submitted their recommendations to me for consideration. With regard to the general scheme of a family law Bill, I have nothing further to add to my reply to Question No. 121 of 28 September 2006.
137 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of serious sexual assaults in the Dublin Garda north central district in 2005 and to date in 2006; the special action the Garda is taking following the recent series of gang rapes in Dublin’s north inner city; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43535/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that the statistics provided on the following table show the number of sexual offences recorded and detected in the North Central Division of the Dublin Metropolitan Region for 2005 and to date in 2006. Local Garda management is aware of the increase in such offences being reported and have directed that additional high-visibility beat and mobile patrols by uniform and plain-clothes Gardaí be carried out. Relevant information regarding known offenders for sexual offences is regularly circulated to personnel within the Division. All offences reported to the Garda authorities in the Division are being actively investigated.
I am further informed that Garda management has met with a number of relevant stakeholders, including representatives of local property management companies, residents and tenants to provide personal crime prevention advice. The meetings also discussed other preventative measures, including the provision of CCTV systems and appropriate lighting, that can be put in place to prevent this type of criminality.
|
Sexual Offence Type |
2006* |
2005 |
||
|
Recorded |
Detected |
Recorded |
Detected |
|
|
Buggery |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rape Section 4 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
Sexual Assault |
36 |
14 |
30 |
7 |
|
Rape of a Female |
24 |
12 |
16 |
7 |
|
Aggravated Sexual Assault |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Unlawful Carnal Knowledge |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
|
Gross Indecency |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Indecency |
0 |
0 |
6 |
4 |
*Figures provided for 2006 are provisional, operational and liable to change.
138 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of gun attacks resulting in death in 2005 and to date in 2006; the number of detections made; and the number of charges brought. [43536/06]
I am informed by the Garda authorities that there were 21 murders with firearms in 2005, of which four were detected and two have proceedings commenced. In 2006 to date there have been 24 murders with firearms, of which eight were detected and five have proceedings commenced. Operation Anvil is central to the strategy of the Garda Síochána in combating serious crime and in particular murder. The Operation, which commenced in the Dublin Metropolitan Region in May, 2005 and was subsequently extended nationwide at my request, has proved to be very successful in disrupting the criminal activities of a number of key criminal gangs. It has resulted in a number of high-profile arrests and the acquisition of intelligence on the movements of criminals. Notable improvements have been achieved in the recorded number of incidents of crime being targeted by the Operation.
The most recent figures available to me show that since the introduction of Operation Anvil in May 2005, 549 firearms have been seized in the Dublin Metropolitan Region. Up to 19 November, Operation Anvil has resulted in the Dublin Metropolitan Region in more than 3,350 arrests for the serious crimes of murder, robbery, burglary and serious assaults, including 56 arrests in connection with murder. Outside the DMR and up to 1 November, 2,600 persons have been arrested and 238 firearms seized.
In addition to the introduction of Operation Anvil, the Garda Commissioner in November 2005 augmented the Organised Crime Unit at the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation with an additional 55 Garda members to address the problem of criminal gang activity. Enforcement by the Unit has resulted in further firearms being seized and a number of persons arrested, thereby disrupting their criminal activities. There has also been an increase in Garda monitoring and targeting of individuals and groups involved in armed crime in particular.
Following the completion of the weapons amnesty on 31 October, the mandatory minimum sentences in relation to possession of firearms came into effect on 1 November. The penalties available to the courts have now been greatly strengthened and stringent penalties now apply.
I am very satisfied with the outcome of the 2007 Estimates process. The allocation for the Garda Vote is increasing by €135.3 million to €1.445 billion — an increase of 10% on 2006. This year's budget in turn represented an increase of 13% on 2005 and an increase of 85% in real terms since 1997. The additional overtime allocation included in this will yield almost three million extra man hours of policing by uniformed and special units throughout the State. As a result, innovative and targeted anti-crime strategies and operations such as Operation Anvil will be continued and intensified on a nationwide basis. This budgetary increase demonstrates that this Government continues to provide record resources for anti-crime strategies.
The Government and I are also committed to increasing the strength of the Garda Síochána. I am informed that the personnel strength of An Garda Síochána increased to a record 13,000 on 16 November, following the attestation of 299 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 on 30 June, 1997 and represents an increase of 21.5% (2,298) in the personnel strength of the Force in the period since then. The induction of 280 new Garda recruits to the Garda College on 6 November resulted in a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,137. Next year will see more than 275 fully trained Gardaí graduating from the Garda College every quarter, allowing the Commissioner to focus a highly visible policing presence throughout the country.
I would like to stress that all killings, regardless of the background of the victim or the method of killing, are the subject of a rigorous investigation by the Garda authorities.
139 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will make a decision on leave to remain in the State in relation to a person (details supplied) in County Limerick as his judicial review proceedings have now been completed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43537/06]
I refer the Deputy to my previous replies to Parliamentary Question No. 1123 of 25 January 2006 and Parliamentary Question No. 133 of 19 October 2006 regarding the person in question. Judicial Review proceedings, which were instituted on 29 September 2005, are still ongoing. Accordingly, as the matter is sub judice, I do not propose to comment further on the matter.
140 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his response to a letter (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43545/06]
The licensing of firearms is solely a matter for the Garda Síochána under the Firearms Act, 1925 as amended and I may not interfere in any way. Officials of my Department have regular meetings with the Chairman and Director of the NARGC on matters relating to firearms and I am informed by the Gardaí that they also meet regularly with the NARGC. I have also been informed that the recommendations in the Barr report relating to firearms have been the subject of recent discussions between the Gardaí and the NARGC.
I am aware of a number of cases which are currently before that courts where members of the public have sought judicial reviews of decisions of Superintendents on the grant of firearms certificates and authorisations under the Firearms Acts. These are matters which will be dealt with in due course by the Courts.
141 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his response to a letter (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43546/06]
I refer the Deputy to my reply to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 194 to 196 of 5 December, 2006.
142 Dr. Upton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will reconsider the refusal of a temporary visa for a person (details supplied) to visit Ireland over Christmas 2006. [43564/06]
The application referred to by the Deputy was received in the Dublin Visa Office on 22nd November, 2006. The decision of the Visa Officer to refuse the application was taken on 29th November, 2006. The decision was appealed on 6th December, 2006. Following a re-examination of the case, the decision to refuse was upheld on 11th December, 2006. As each applicant is entitled to one appeal only, no further review in this matter can be granted; however it is open to the applicant to make a fresh application.
143 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will assist in the return of the children of a person (details supplied) in County Louth under the Hague Convention; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43587/06]
As the Deputy will appreciate, it would not be appropriate for me to comment in detail on an individual case. I can tell the Deputy that the case referred to by him is the subject of an application to the Central Authority which operates in my Department for the purposes of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. That Convention is designed to ensure the return of children who have been abducted from one contracting state to another. The application in this case was received by the Irish Central Authority on 18 September 2006, and after translation into French was forwarded to the Central Authority in France on 27 September 2006. The Irish Central Authority is in regular communication with its counterpart in France, which is responsible for ensuring that whatever steps are available to it in that jurisdiction, including if necessary the institution of proceedings before a French court, are taken as expeditiously as possible. The Irish Central Authority, in this case as in all others it deals with, is keeping the applicant fully informed of developments as they occur.
144 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he has received a new application for reunification in regard to the person referred to in Parliamentary Question No. 95 of 9 November 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43595/06]
My Department has no record of a current visa application in respect of the persons referred to in Parliamentary Question No. 95 of 9th November, 2006.
145 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if having regard to his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 185 of 5 December 2006, he will arrange for the issue of temporary travel documentation in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43596/06]
The person concerned arrived in Ireland on 30th April, 2005 and was permitted to enter the State for a three month period. This permission was later extended by her local registration office up to 07th February, 2006. The person concerned subsequently lodged a residence application in June, 2006 with the Immigration Division of my Department and I understand that a decision in relation to the application will issue shortly.
146 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason he proposes to deport the father of a child born here to a native Irish mother; if he will review this case as a matter of urgency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43597/06]
I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 94 of Thursday 16th November, 2006, and 133 of Thursday 23rd November, 2006 and the written replies to those Questions. The position is unchanged.
147 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of the residency application in the name of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 22; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43598/06]
I refer the deputy to my previous reply of 30 November 2006 in relation to the person in question. The position remains unchanged.
148 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if his attention has been drawn to the circumstances whereby a person (details supplied) in County Kildare who recently returned here illegally arising from threats, intimidation and physical violence in the UK; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43599/06]
I would refer the Deputy to my replies to Dáil Questions Numbers100 of 07 December, 2006, and 701 of 25 April, 2006, in relation to the person concerned. Since my last reply I understand from the Garda National Immigration Bureau that the person concerned was removed to the United Kingdom on 09 December, 2006. I would advise the Deputy that any person who receives threats, intimidation and/or physical violence in the United Kingdom should report any such incidents to the British police authorities.
149 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will award extended residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8 in view of the availability of compelling and supporting evidence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43600/06]
The person concerned arrived in the State on 3 April, 2001 and applied for asylum. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, by the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended, he was informed by letter dated 5 July, 2002, that the Minister proposed to make a deportation order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State; leaving the State before an order is made or consenting to the making of a deportation order. Representations have been received on behalf of the person concerned.
This person's case file, including all representations submitted, will be considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended, and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (Prohibition of Refoulement). I expect the file to be passed to me for decision in due course.
150 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if and when he expects to be in a position to accept a valid or eligible application for naturalisation in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43601/06]
The persons referred to in the Deputy's question both applied for certificates of naturalisation in November, 2002 and I decided to refuse both applications. The reasons for my decision were disclosed to the individuals concerned in letters dated 16 February 2005. It is open to both persons to submit further applications at any time provided they satisfy the relevant statutory conditions. In doing so, however, they should give due regard to my reasons for refusing the previous applications.
151 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 56 of 30 November 2006 and the full circumstances surrounding this case, if his attention has been drawn to the fears and concerns of the person concerned in the event of being deported to Belgium from whence they were previously returned to their homeland with serious consequences; the way it is proposed to give effective support to an application under council regulation, EC No. 343/2003 if the appeal procedure is ignored while the appeal is pending the applicant is then transferred or deported but subsequently given permission to return here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43602/06]
I would refer the Deputy to my reply to Dáil Question number 56 of 30 November, 2006, in respect of the person concerned. First of all I would like to advise the Deputy that the person concerned has still failed to present herself to the Garda National Immigration Bureau, (GNIB), as requested and continues to be illegally present in the State. She should, without any further delay, present herself to the appropriate authorities, in this case either the GNIB or An Garda Síochána.
I would also like to inform the Deputy that the person concerned is not being deported, but rather transferred to Belgium in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No. 343/2003. Belgium is the appropriate State to process her application for asylum on the basis that she made an asylum application there on 18 February, 2005.
I also wish to advise the Deputy that Belgium is a party to and thus bound by international human rights instruments which prohibit refoulement. The current development of a common EU asylum policy is predicated on the full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 New York Protocol, thus maintaining its principle of non-refoulement. Council Regulation (EC) No. 432/2003 is based on this common policy. Belgium respects the principle of non-refoulement thus ensuring that a person is not sent back to face persecution.
In relation to the appeals procedure and as I previously illustrated to the Deputy, in my reply to his previous Dáil Question in relation to this case, an appeal of the determination of the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, (ORAC), can be appealed to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. However the appeal can be pursued from the receiving Regulation State, in this case Belgium. If the appeal is successful, my Department will make arrangements with the appropriate authorities in Belgium in order to arrange for the person concerned to be returned to Ireland and for her asylum application to be examined substantively by the ORAC.
In conclusion, I would like to remind the Deputy that the person concerned continues to evade her transfer and is illegally present in the State. She should present herself to the GNIB or An Garda Síochána without any further delay.
152 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if an investigation has been carried out to ascertain if the transfer to France in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare will result in a direct deportation to the Democratic Republic of Congo which in turn will result in serious endangerment; if he will defer transfer pending such an investigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43603/06]
As the Deputy is no doubt aware, the case of the person concerned falls under the terms of the Dublin II Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No. 343/2003. This Regulation is intended to prevent the phenomenon of ‘asylum shopping' across Europe and sets out criteria for determining which Regulation State is responsible for examining an asylum application where applications have been lodged in more than one Regulation State or whereby an asylum seeker has been granted a visa to enter another Regulation State and has entered that other State before entering Ireland and making an asylum application here. At the same time, it guarantees applicants that one State will process their application, thereby preventing the creation of ‘refugees in orbit', a situation which had previously pertained in Europe. Under the Dublin II Regulation, the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) can, on the basis of relevant criteria, request another Regulation State to accept responsibility for an asylum application and have it processed in that other state.
The person concerned lodged an asylum claim in this State on 19 May, 2006. Following investigation by the ORAC and pursuant to the provisions of the Dublin II Regulation, it was established that France was the appropriate State to process the application as the person concerned had previously lodged an asylum claim there on 14 January, 2005, and the appropriate authorities in France have accepted their responsibilities accordingly. The ORAC informed the person concerned of their determination on 08 August, 2006, whilst at the same time affording her an opportunity to appeal the determination to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal (RAT). The person concerned appealed the ORAC determination to RAT which the RAT upheld and the person concerned was informed of this by way of letter on 28 September, 2006.
As a direct consequence of the ORAC determination, a Transfer Order was signed in respect of the person concerned on 10 August, 2006. This Order was issued to her on 24 August, 2006, requiring her to present herself to the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB), 13-14 Burgh Quay, Dublin 2 on 29 August, 2006, in order for arrangements to be made for her transfer to France. The person failed to attend the GNIB on this date and was recorded as having evaded her transfer pursuant to the provisions of the Dublin II Regulation.
The situation in the home country of the person concerned and her need, if any, for international protection are matters for France to consider as part of its examination of her asylum claim. The Deputy may also wish to know that France is a party to and thus bound by international human rights instruments which prohibit refoulement. The current development of a common EU asylum policy is predicated on the full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 New York Protocol, thus maintaining its principle of non-refoulement. Council Regulation (EC) No. 432/2003 is based on this common policy and every Regulation State respects the principle of non-refoulement thus assuring that no person is sent back to face persecution.
This said I do not propose to instigate any investigation into the asylum process in France as the Dublin II Regulation is binding on all EU Member States and the transfer of the person concerned will be effected at the earliest possible opportunity.
153 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of an application for family reunification in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43604/06]
I understand from the Immigration Division of my Department that a decision has been reached in relation to the application in question. The refugee will be informed of the decision shortly.
154 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to previous parliamentary questions, the extent to which an investigation has been undertaken to confirm the safety and well-being of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7 in the event of them being deported to their homeland in view of the fact that they have lived here for five years and have serious concerns for their safety in the event of their deportation; if he has studied reports of the ORAC or RAT and other information relevant in this case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43624/06]
I would refer the Deputy to my earlier Replies to his previous Parliamentary Questions in this matter. As previously stated, the person concerned arrived in the State on 11 April 2001 and applied for asylum. His application was refused following the consideration of his case, at first instance by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) and, on appeal, by the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. As the Deputy is aware, the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner is a statutory body, independent in the performance of its functions, in accordance with the provisions of Section 6 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended). Similarly the Refugee Appeals Tribunal is a statutory body, independent in the performance of its functions, in accordance with the provisions of sections 15 and 16 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended). Additionally, each of those bodies is required to examine all elements of each asylum application it receives and, this being the case, I am entirely satisfied that all elements of the asylum application and appeal submitted by the person concerned was examined in detail before any final position was arrived at by those bodies. Equally, I am satisfied that any documentation or correspondence included as part of the asylum application or appeal was given appropriate consideration by those bodies.
I would refer the Deputy again to my Reply to Parliamentary Question No. 86 of Thursday 26 October 2006 where I explained how a Deportation Order came to be made against the person concerned. The Deputy will note from that Reply that a Deportation Order was signed by me only after all relevant factors and documentation had been taken into account. Consequently a Deportation Order was signed by me on 11 September 2003.
I am satisfied that all elements of the asylum application, appeal and application for permission to remain in the State submitted by the person concerned have been fairly and comprehensively examined. As a result, I am satisfied that the decision to issue a Deportation Order in respect of the person concerned was entirely justified.
155 Ms Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will expedite a decision on a request for a work visa for a person (details supplied) in Dublin 9; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43657/06]
Further to Parliamentary Question No. 52 put down by Deputy Pat Carey for answer on the 30th November 2006, the Immigration Division of my Department was in contact with the person concerned requesting documentation. I understand the person concerned has recently submitted the requested documentation and the Immigration Division will be in contact with him shortly.
156 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the establishment of a special unit within An Garda Síochána dedicated to the investigation of missing persons reports in view of the additional resources that will be available to the Garda with the introduction of the new Garda Reserve Force; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43658/06]
Under section 15 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005, which provides for the establishment of a Garda Reserve, the powers and duties of reserve members may be determined by the Garda Commissioner. It is the responsibility of Garda management to allocate personnel to and within Divisions. These personnel allocations are determined by a number of factors including demographics, crime trends, administrative functions and other operational policing needs. Such allocations are continually monitored and reviewed along with overall policing arrangements and operational strategy. This ensures that optimum use is made of Garda resources, and that the best possible service is provided to the public.
The Garda Missing Person Bureau is attached to Garda Headquarters and is responsible for maintaining data relating to missing persons. The District Officer in the area where the person has been reported missing takes direct responsibility for all issues relating to the investigation of the circumstances of the missing person. When a person is reported missing, the local Garda Superintendent will appoint an investigation team to include any specialised unit deemed necessary, for example, the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation or the Technical Bureau. The services of Interpol and Europol are also available to assist in these investigations. In addition, every Garda District has a specially trained search team that is familiar with the locality. The investigation of missing persons is a dedicated subject on the curriculum at the Garda College, Templemore, and is also a subject covered in in-service training.
The Garda authorities are continuously monitoring international developments in relation to investigations of missing persons in order to ensure that best practice is followed and have assured me that they are satisfied that adequate resources are available for the investigation and monitoring of incidents where persons are reported missing.
157 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will clarify the amount of funding allocated to Victim Support between 1985 and 2000, and subsequently between 2000 and 2005 in view of conflicting information regarding same (details supplied); the amount of funding supplied to Victim Support between 1985 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43659/06]
In view of the possible confusion arising from the previous replies to the Deputy, my officials are preparing a full response and I will revert to the Deputy as soon as possible with the relevant information.
158 Mr. Nolan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of deportation orders issued for persons with addresses in County Carlow over the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43660/06]
The deportation statistics requested by the Deputy are set out in the following table:
|
Year |
Number of deportation orders served to addresses in County Carlow |
|
2001 |
6 |
|
2002 |
20 |
|
2003 |
14 |
|
2004 |
22 |
|
2005 |
17 |
|
2006 (to date) |
16 |
|
Full total |
95 |
159 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the measures he has taken to enhance the co-operation between his Department and other Government Departments regarding the increase in security measures at small airfields; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43661/06]
Following events involving Weston aerodrome this autumn, I informed the House that I would commence a process within my Department to audit the actions being taken at Weston Aerodrome and other airfields. Since then, my officials have been in discussions with An Garda Síochána and the Revenue Commissioners. Both organisations are generally satisfied with the level of cooperation that exists between them. However, it has been agreed that enhanced arrangements should be put in place for liaison between the Gardaí and Customs at local and regional levels particularly in the context of small airfields.
I am also informed that the Revenue Commissioners are carrying out a review of their arrangements at small airports. This review is expected to be finalised in the coming weeks. It is likely that the review will deal, inter alia, with risk assessments, intelligence driven operations and spot checks at these airports.
160 Ms C. Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the establishment of an interdepartmental body between his Department and the Department of Health and Children to investigate the measures that may be taken to tackle the growing missing persons problem, in view of his Department’s involvement in such matters from a policing perspective and the involvement of mental health services with missing persons experiencing difficulties; his further views on taking such action also with a view to tackling the growing problem of suicide; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43662/06]
The Garda authorities take direct responsibility for all issues relating to the investigation of the circumstances of missing persons. Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act 2004. While there is ongoing co-operation between An Garda Síochána and the HSE on the matters referred to, currently there are no proposals to establish an inter-departmental group.
As the Deputy may be aware, the HSE established the National Office for Suicide Prevention following the launch in September 2005 of "Reach Out", a National Strategy for Action on Suicide Prevention. The Office was established to oversee the implementation of the Strategy and to coordinate suicide prevention activities across the State, consult widely in relation to the planning of future initiatives and ensure best practice in suicide prevention.
161 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the reason child care fees in his Department’s crèche in Athlone were increased; his views on whether it is acceptable, in view of Government policy, for a 30% increase in fees for children over 12 months old and a 20% increase for those under 12 months; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43462/06]
The Interim Board of the Civil Service Childcare Agency (the Board), which is the body responsible for licensing the operators who run the Civil Service crèches, decided at its meeting on 20 September 2006 to increase the weekly fees at the Athlone Civil Service crèche from 127 Euro to 150 Euro for babies and from 100 Euro to 130 Euro for children over 1 year of age with effect from 1 January 2007. These increased fees compare favourably with fees charged by private crèches in County Westmeath as per the National Children's Nurseries Association which quotes a maximum fee of 160 Euro per week for children and 176 Euro per week for babies in County Westmeath.
Fees at the Athlone Civil Service crèche have not been increased since October 2005. The Board, in deciding to increase the fees took into account the increasing costs being incurred by all the Civil Service crèches, in particular wage costs which represent the biggest cost to operators. The fee increases will ensure that the salaries paid to staff are in line with levels generally applying in the field and that the crèches will continue to be in a position to attract high calibre staff. In addition the fee increases will ensure that standards of child care are maintained at the highest level and that the crèches will be operating on a sound financial basis into the future.
In line with the regulations governing childcare services, the Board is committed to ensuring that all staff in Civil Service crèches are properly qualified, receive ongoing training and are paid accordingly. The regulations have recently been reviewed and the revised regulations will come into effect on 1st January 2007. These new regulations will place a greater emphasis on staff training with a view to enhancing the quality of childcare provision and the Civil Service crèches must be in a position to comply with these regulations. The Board has also decided that the same fee levels will apply from January 2007 for the Sligo and Ennis Civil Service crèches in order to standardise the fee levels and implementation dates across the three crèches. I can assure the deputy that the Board is totally committed to ensuring the highest standards and the best possible care for the children in Civil Service crèches.
162 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Finance the reason a farmer who involuntarily makes a disposal under a compulsory purchase order can be forced into a situation whereby they have to pay 20% of the market value back to the State, if the capital gains tax should be an allowable expense and awarded to the land owner; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43519/06]
Capital gains tax (CGT) is a tax on a capital gain arising on the disposal of an asset. A 20% rate of CGT generally applies on the gain arising on the disposal of assets.
Where compensation is received for land that is compulsorily acquired, any gains arising from the amount paid for the acquisition of the land are chargeable to capital gains tax. In other words, if there is a sum paid by a public authority for the compulsory acquisition of land, then irrespective of its components (for example disturbance, injurious affection etc.), that total sum will be the amount to be assessed for tax. If additional sums were paid in respect of land acquired (however described), they would still be regarded as part of the consideration payable and would be liable to tax in the normal way.
The CGT due on a disposal of land under a CPO is calculated in the same way as any other disposal of land.
163 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Finance if Section 469 of the Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997 will be amended to allow tax relief on the cost of specific tuition for people with dyslexia. [43346/06]
The position is that expenses in respect of tuition for children with dyslexia do not qualify for health expenses tax relief and have never qualified for the relief since it was first introduced in 1967.
I understand from the Revenue Commissioners, who deal with such claims, that individuals may have been under the impression that tuition for children with dyslexia was allowable under the heading of health expenses relief. I also understand that the Revenue Commissioners have written to the Dyslexia Association to clarify the matter.
In recent years, the Government has increased significantly the supports available through the direct expenditure system for children with disabilities, including those with dyslexia.
As with many areas where State support may be required, the question arises as to whether such support may be more effectively provided through the direct expenditure route rather than through the tax system. One advantage of the former mechanism is that the support may be better targeted at those in need, irrespective of family income, whereas support through the tax system can only benefit those whose incomes are high enough to benefit from tax relief.
I have no plans to extend Section 469 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 to cover expenses incurred by parents who have children with dyslexia. However, this matter, like any other, can be raised by the Deputies at Finance Bill time.
164 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 160 of 28 September 2006, the status of the negotiations for the acquisition of a site in Mullingar; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43404/06]
The Commissioners of Public Works have informed me that negotiations are continuing for the acquisition of a suitable site in Mullingar.
165 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the procedures for removing a person who is employed by or under the State; if there is a difference in the employment status of the two definitions; if an outside body other than an agent of the State can terminate such a persons employment or instruct it to be terminated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43405/06]
I understand that the Deputy's question relates specifically to the position of an established civil servant subject to the provisions of the Civil Service Regulation Act 1956.
There are a number of grounds on which a civil servant may be removed from office:
[a] Under the Civil Service Regulation Act 1956, the Government may dismiss or discipline an established civil servant for misconduct or fraud. There is a disciplinary code which sets out the procedures under which this action can take place; the Code also provides for an appeal process to allow the officer the opportunity to state a defence. In the case of an unestablished civil servant, dismissal may be decided by the relevant Minister.
[b] The Civil Regulation Act 1956 also allows for compulsory retirement on grounds of ill-health at the initiative of the employing Department or Office.
[c] Under the 1909 and 1963 Superannuation and Pensions Acts, an officer may be retired early on grounds of organisational efficiency or effectiveness and receive a pension before the normal pension age.
[d] Before the commencement on 4 July, 2006 of the Civil Service Regulation (Amendment) Act 2005, the termination of employment of an established civil servant was decided by the Government. With the commencement of the Act, the relevant Minister has powers of discipline for the grades of Principal upwards, and Secretaries-General and Heads of Office have responsibility for grades below Principal.
[e] In relation to the definition of the term "employed by or under the State", this phrase has been interpreted by the courts in a number of cases. The phrase covers both civil servants of the State and of the Government. The former refers to persons employed by the organs of the State established by the Constitution such as the Attorney General and the President. The latter refers to persons employed in the Civil Service of the Government, that is Departments controlled by individual Ministers. The distinction is a technical one and both groups are civil servants.
[f] It is not possible to comment on the role of an "outside body" in relation to the dismissal of an employee as this may depend on a number of factors including the employment relationship and who the employer is in any particular situation.
166 Mr. McGinley asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details, in respect of all increases, including those awarded arising from review body recommendations and the partnership agreements, granted to An Taoiseach, Tánaiste, all Government Ministers and Ministers of State; the increases in remuneration which each has received since 1997; the date of the increase and the percentage increase in all cases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43408/06]
The following table lists the pay rates in place at 1 January 1997 and all subsequent pay increases (General, Review Body on Higher Remuneration in the Public Sector and Benchmarking) since then for the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, Ministers, Ministers of State and TD.
Report No. 38 of the Review Body on Higher Remuneration in the Public Sector recommended that the salary of a TD should be set at the ordinary maximum of the grade of Principal (standard) in the civil service. This recommendation has since been implemented. The provision of long service increments for T.D.s is in line with the views expressed in the above Review Body report. Any increases for Principals awarded by the Public Service Benchmarking Body will be paid to TDs.
The salaries of the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, Minister and Minister of State are made up of two elements the office holder's salary plus the T.D.'s basic salary. While the TDs element of the salary is determined in the manner set out above the office holder's element is based on general pay increases and recommendations by the Review Body on Higher Remuneration. The office holder's salary does not attract increases recommended by the Public Service Benchmarking Body.
|
Application of Benchmarking and Sustaining Progress |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General Increases |
1.01.97 PCW Phase 5 1% |
1.07.97 P2000 Phase 1 2.5% |
1.04.98 P2000 Phase 2 2.5% |
1.07.98 P2000 Phase 3 2.25% |
1.07.99 P2000 Phase 4 1.5% |
1.04.00 P2000 Phase 5 1% |
1.10.00 PPF Phase 1 5.5% |
|||
|
Special Increase |
1.04.97 R/ Body Report No. 37* |
+ 2% Local Bargaining |
25.09.00 R/Body Report No. 38 — Phase 1 — 5%* |
1.03.01 R/Body Report No. 38 — Phase 2* |
||||||
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
|
(3.02%) |
(4.76%) |
|||||||||
|
TD — basic |
44,068 |
45,398 |
45,730 |
46,533 |
47,581 |
49,261 |
49,753 |
52,241 |
55,114 |
57,739 |
|
(28.26%) |
(4.76%) |
|||||||||
|
Taoiseach |
68,091 |
87,334 |
87,665 |
89,518 |
91,532 |
94,762 |
95,709 |
100,495 |
106,022 |
111,070 |
|
TD |
44,068 |
45,398 |
45,730 |
46,533 |
47,581 |
49,261 |
49,753 |
52,241 |
55,114 |
57,739 |
|
Total |
112,159 |
132,732 |
133,395 |
136,051 |
139,113 |
144,023 |
145,462 |
152,736 |
161,136 |
168,809 |
|
(32.5%) |
(4.76%) |
|||||||||
|
Tánaiste |
51,879 |
68,739 |
69,070 |
70,457 |
72,042 |
74,586 |
75,331 |
79,098 |
83,448 |
87,421 |
|
TD |
44,068 |
45,398 |
45,730 |
46,533 |
47,581 |
49,261 |
49,753 |
52,241 |
55,114 |
57,739 |
|
Total |
95,947 |
114,137 |
114,800 |
116,990 |
119,623 |
123,847 |
125,084 |
131,339 |
138,562 |
145,160 |
|
(33.35%) |
(4.76%) |
|||||||||
|
Ministers |
45,393 |
60,531 |
60,862 |
62,044 |
63,440 |
65,678 |
66,335 |
69,651 |
73,482 |
76,982 |
|
TD |
44,068 |
45,398 |
45,730 |
46,533 |
47,581 |
49,261 |
49,753 |
52,241 |
55,114 |
57,739 |
|
Total |
89,461 |
105,929 |
106,592 |
108,577 |
111,021 |
114,939 |
116,088 |
121,892 |
128,596 |
134,721 |
|
(11.8%) |
(4.76%) |
|||||||||
|
Minister of State |
24,318 |
27,188 |
27,519 |
27,867 |
28,494 |
29,501 |
29,796 |
31,286 |
33,007 |
34,578 |
|
TD |
44,068 |
45,398 |
45,730 |
46,533 |
47,581 |
49,261 |
49,753 |
52,241 |
55,114 |
57,739 |
|
Total |
68,386 |
72,586 |
73,249 |
74,400 |
76,075 |
78,762 |
79,549 |
83,527 |
88,121 |
92,317 |
*Review Body increases are shown as percentage increases over salary levels indicated in the previous column.
|
General Increases |
1.04.01 PPF Phase 2 2% |
1.10.01 PPF Phase 3 5.5% |
1.10.02 PPF Phase 4 4% |
1.01.04 SP Phase 1 3% |
1.07.04 SP Phase 2 2% |
1.12.04 SP Phase 3 2% |
||||
|
Special Increases |
1.07.01 R/Body Report No. 38 — Phase 3(2) |
1.12.01 PSBB Phase 1 |
1.04.02 R/Body Report No. 38 — Phase 4(2) |
1.01.04 PSBB Phase 2 |
||||||
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
|
(5.6%) |
(6.7%) |
|||||||||
|
TD — basic |
58,893 |
62,173 |
65,592 |
66,600 |
71,071 |
73,914 |
76,131 |
80,457 |
82,066 |
83,707 |
|
(5.5%) |
(5.2%) |
|||||||||
|
Taoiseach |
113,292 |
119,565 |
126,141 |
126,141 |
132,761 |
138,072 |
142,214 |
142,214 |
145,058 |
147,959 |
|
TD |
58,605 |
62,173 |
65,592 |
66,600 |
71,071 |
73,914 |
76,131 |
80,457 |
82,066 |
83,707 |
|
Total |
171,897 |
181,738 |
191,733 |
192,741 |
203,832 |
211,986 |
218,345 |
222,671 |
227,124 |
231,666 |
|
(5.2%) |
(4.98%) |
|||||||||
|
Tánaiste |
89,170 |
93,841 |
99,003 |
99,003 |
103,931 |
108,088 |
111,331 |
111,331 |
113,558 |
115,829 |
|
TD |
58,605 |
62,173 |
65,592 |
66,600 |
71,071 |
73,914 |
76,131 |
80,457 |
82,066 |
83,707 |
|
Total |
147,775 |
156,014 |
164,595 |
165,603 |
175,002 |
182,002 |
187,462 |
191,788 |
195,624 |
199,536 |
|
(4.03%) |
(3.9%) |
|||||||||
|
Ministers |
78,522 |
81,686 |
86,178 |
86,178 |
89,516 |
93,097 |
95,890 |
95,890 |
97,808 |
99,764 |
|
TD |
58,605 |
62,173 |
65,592 |
66,600 |
71,071 |
73,914 |
76,131 |
80,457 |
82,066 |
83,707 |
|
Total |
137,127 |
143,859 |
151,770 |
152,778 |
160,587 |
167,011 |
172,021 |
176,347 |
179,874 |
183,471 |
|
(2.5%) |
(2.4%) |
|||||||||
|
Minister of State |
35,270 |
36,148 |
38,137 |
38,137 |
39,062 |
40,625 |
41,844 |
41,844 |
42,681 |
43,535 |
|
TD |
58,605 |
62,173 |
65,592 |
66,600 |
71,071 |
73,914 |
76,131 |
80,457 |
82,066 |
83,707 |
|
Total |
93,875 |
98,321 |
103,729 |
104,737 |
110,133 |
114,539 |
117,975 |
122,301 |
124,747 |
127,242 |
* Review Body increases are shown as percentage increases over salary levels indicated in the previous column.
|
General Increases |
1.06.05 SP Phase 4 1.5% |
1.12.05 SP Phase 5 1.5% |
1.06.06 SP Phase 62.5% |
1.12.06 T2016 Phase 1 3% |
||
|
Special Increases |
1.06.05 PSBB Phase 3 |
1.07.05 Interim RB Phase 1 3.75% |
1.01.06 Interim RB Phase 2 3.1624% |
|||
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
|
TD — basic |
87,247 |
87,247 |
88,556 |
88,556 |
90,770 |
93,493 |
|
Taoiseach |
150,178 |
155,810 |
158,147 |
163,863 |
167,960 |
172,999 |
|
TD |
87,247 |
87,247 |
88,556 |
88,556 |
90,770 |
93,493 |
|
Total |
237,425 |
243,057 |
246,703 |
252,419 |
258,730 |
266,492 |
|
Tánaiste |
117,566 |
121,975 |
123,805 |
128,279 |
131,486 |
135,431 |
|
TD |
87,247 |
87,247 |
88,556 |
88,556 |
90,770 |
93,493 |
|
Total |
204,813 |
209,222 |
212,361 |
216,835 |
222,256 |
228,924 |
|
Ministers |
101,260 |
105,057 |
106,633 |
110,488 |
113,250 |
116,648 |
|
TD |
87,247 |
87,247 |
88,556 |
88,556 |
90,770 |
93,493 |
|
Total |
188,507 |
192,304 |
195,189 |
199,044 |
204,020 |
210,141 |
|
Minister of State |
44,188 |
45,845 |
46,533 |
48,215 |
49,420 |
50,903 |
|
TD |
87,247 |
87,247 |
88,556 |
88,556 |
90,770 |
93,493 |
|
Total |
131,435 |
133,092 |
135,089 |
136,771 |
140,190 |
144,396 |
167 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the annual cost of the VRT remittance in respect of hybrid electric vehicles on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; the number of cars that received the remittance for each of the years for which figures are available; the VRT tax take for each of the years; the number of cars registered and paid VRT in each year; the percentage of car registrations registered for remittance under this scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; the estimated number of vehicles to register in this way; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43409/06]
168 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the annual cost of the VRT remittance in respect of flexible fuel vehicles on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; the number of cars that received the remittance for each of the years for which figures are available; the VRT tax take for each of the years; the number of cars registered and paid VRT in each year; the percentage of car registrations registered for remittance under this scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; the estimated number of vehicles to register in this way; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43410/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 167 and 168 together.
As the Deputy is aware the 50% VRT relief in respect of electric vehicles was introduced in 2001 and the relief was extended to flexible fuel vehicles in 2006. It is difficult to predict sales of hybrid electrical vehicles and flexible fuel vehicles for 2007. The popularity of hybrid electrical vehicles should continue to grow while the supply of flexible fuel vehicles will be limited in the short term as the technology involved is still in its infancy.
The following Table sets out data regarding the annual cost of the VRT remittance and the number of vehicles qualifying for the relief in respect of hybrid electric and flexible fuel vehicles on an annual basis since the introduction of the schemes. It also contains data relating to the total VRT yield and total number of cars registered in each of the years in question.
|
Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
Flexible Fuel Vehicles |
Total car registrations and VRT receipts |
||||
|
Number |
Cost |
Number |
Cost |
Number |
Yield |
|
|
€ |
€ |
€m |
||||
|
2001 |
20 |
56,361 |
n/a |
n/a |
181,314 |
771.9 |
|
2002 |
11 |
36,980 |
n/a |
n/a |
170,151 |
777.1 |
|
2003 |
9 |
33,975 |
n/a |
n/a |
160,034 |
806.7 |
|
2004 |
246 |
0.98m |
n/a |
n/a |
178,070 |
930.0 |
|
2005 |
324 |
1.65m |
n/a |
n/a |
213,682 |
1,129 |
|
2006 to End Nov. |
643 |
4.99m |
77 |
0.25m |
230,798 |
1,254 |
169 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Finance the reason the section of the Tolka River wall at the rear of the houses at Tolka Road, Dublin 3 is the only section of river wall along the Dublin City stretch of the Tolka that has not been strengthened or increased in height; the estimated cost of strengthening this section of wall and increasing the wall to the same height as the new wall on the northern side of the river, directly opposite; if the Office of Public Works inspectors viewed the Tolka River at this location during the high tides of the week ending 10 December 2006 when the water was lapping the top of the wall; if he will direct the OPW to review this matter again urgently; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43439/06]
Dublin City Council is the contracting Authority for the River Tolka flood relief works and the Office of Public Works has been advised by the City Council that the wall has been re-evaluated, in the last few weeks, by the Engineering Consultants undertaking the design of the works, and is considered to be high enough to cater for the flood event which the works are constructed for, as well as providing the necessary freeboard of 300mm. Many other walls in the City area have also been found to be of adequate height and have not been altered.
As the Deputy will be aware, parts of this wall were raised during the works in order to bring the wall to adequate defence height. As I have informed the Deputy before, the wall on the opposite side of the channel is higher in places for safety reasons as it is required to ensure a safe height from the footpath on the road side.
The Office of Public Works has not received any reports of water levels reaching the top of this wall last weekend. However, my officials have asked the City Council to investigate the matter.
170 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Finance if the contents of a letter (details supplied) will be noted; if as stated the applicant was not made aware either by letter, newspaper advertisement or radio notification the options available to them to appeal or seek a refund of outstanding amount of taxes due to them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43457/06]
I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the contents of the taxpayer's letter have been noted. Whilst an individual letter did not issue to the taxpayer, or indeed any taxpayer, to advise of the changes to the period of permissible claims, the extensive media campaign undertaken by Revenue was deemed to be the most appropriate method by which to notify taxpayers of the important changes concerned. As indicated to the Deputy in response to an earlier question on this issue, these changes were passed into legislation by the Government in the Finance Act 2003.
The taxpayer was not requested to submit any outstanding tax returns as he did not register for income tax until 26 October 2005, and only then notified the Revenue Commissioners that his business had commenced on 1 July 1995. There is an obligation on the taxpayer to submit a self assessment return for each year in accordance with the provisions of Section 951 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997.
171 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Finance if there has been progress in concluding the contract for the purchase of a site for the new school (details supplied) in County Kildare. [43477/06]
I refer to my responses to Parliamentary Question No. 29984/06 of 27th September 2006 and Parliamentary Question No. 36866/06 of 8th November 2006. The updated position remains the same.
172 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Finance when will the catchment flood risk assessment and management study for the Rye River commence. [43482/06]
The Commissioners of Public Works met with Kildare County Council on the 13th November 2006 and it was agreed that flood protection could be provided for Dun Cairn Estate early next year provided the necessary planning process is completed successfully. OPW will undertake the work as agents for the County Council. Since it has been possible to identify a viable scheme it is not considered necessary to undertake a Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study for this area at present.
OPW and Kildare County Council are continuing to consider options to relieve the flooding at Mill Lane with the intention that if a viable scheme is confirmed works would also be undertaken early next year.
Subject to it being possible to resolve both these issues as anticipated, it is not intended to proceed with the Rye Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study at this stage. The Rye and the Sillechain watercourses will instead be included in a planned future study of the River Liffey Catchment.
173 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Finance when work on the new Garda station for Leixlip will commence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43509/06]
It is expected that construction of the new Garda station at Leixlip will commence early in the new year.
174 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 117 of 9 November, 2006 when a site purchase will be completed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43528/06]
Signed contracts have been forwarded to the vendor's solicitors, week ending 8th December 2006. The purchase is expected to be completed in January 2007.
175 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Finance if he will request a report form the Office of Public Works on the result of the consultation with the local community following the meeting in the Navan Road district on 8 December 2006; the action the OPW will take in response to the concerns expressed by the community and in particular if the issue of the negative impact on Blackhorse Avenue, Dublin 7 will be addressed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43534/06]
179 Dr. Fitzpatrick asked the Minister for Finance if, in view of the public opposition to the Office of Public Works plans to make Cabra and Ashtown gates, Phoenix Park one way, he will abandon the planned implementation of the one way system; if he will arrange for traffic lights at Ashtown gates; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43649/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 175 and 179 together.
The OPW has engaged in extensive consultations with stakeholders and the local community in relation to their proposed traffic control measures for the Phoenix Park.
Following that consultation, the OPW are now considering the issues raised by various parties and hope to amend and finalise their proposals for implementation in the new year.
176 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Finance the stamp duty provisions, which are applicable to a farmer who wishes to buy lands; if there are any exemptions; if provisions for stamp duty liability that would be levied, could be paid over a period of time; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43573/06]
Stamp duty is liable on the conveyance of any property by the person receiving the property. Where a farmer purchases land, he or she is liable to stamp duty at the rates applicable to non-residential property. However, there are a number of reliefs and exemptions within the stamp duty code that assist with the transfer of farmland.
There is an exemption from stamp duty for qualified young trained farmers receiving farmland. Farmers aged under 35 years who possess specific agricultural qualification may be eligible for this relief. In addition, transfers of land between certain blood relatives qualify for consanguinity relief which reduces the rate of stamp duty to one-half of the rate which would otherwise apply.
Relief from stamp duty is also available for exchanges of farmland between two farmers for the purposes of consolidating each farmer's holding. There are conditions relating to consolidation, farming and ownership attached to this provision. I announced in the Budget that this relief will be extended to qualifying exchanges of land where only one farmer is consolidating his/her holding. In such cases both farmers may qualify for relief, provided they both meet all other conditions of the relief. These changes will be included in the 2007 Finance Bill. However, commencement of these changes is dependent on EU approval.
Under the stamp duty legislation, any stamp duty payable on conveyances must be paid within 30 days of the transfer of the property concerned.
177 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the tax incentives that apply to the provision of staff showers at places of employment; the cost to the Exchequer in each of the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43643/06]
I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that there are no specific tax incentives available for the provision of staff showers at places of employment. However, there may be capital allowances available depending on the circumstances of the particular case. Wear and tear allowances are given in respect of the cost of providing plant and machinery to be used for the purposes of a trade. These allowances are given at the rate of 12½% per annum of the amount of the capital expenditure on the plant over an 8-year period. The actual shower units, i.e. the sanitary ware and fittings involved, would generally be regarded by Revenue as plant.
Industrial buildings allowances are given for buildings and structures that are provided for the recreation or welfare of staff that are employed in particular types of industrial buildings. Some examples of such buildings are factories, hotels, airports, nursing homes and private hospitals. Again, depending on the circumstances of the case, industrial buildings allowances may be available for a building or part of a building or a structure that is used to house staff showers. The rate at which the allowances are given depends on the type of building involved. For example, capital expenditure on factories can be written off at the rate of 4% per annum over a 25-year period while capital expenditure on a nursing home can be written off at the rate of 15% for the first six years and 10% in year 7.
I am also informed by the Revenue Commissioners that no information is available in relation to any capital allowances that might have been claimed in respect of the provision of staff showers. All of the claims for wear and tear allowances for plant and machinery are aggregated on the income tax return form and claims for the different types of plant are not separately identified. Similarly, claims for industrial buildings allowances do not distinguish between the different parts of a building or where there are separate buildings involved so that it is not possible to identify any claims for buildings or structures that house staff showers.
178 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if the review of customs arrangements at Weston Aerodrome has been completed; the recommendations of the review; if customs inspections at the facility will be stepped up in view of the review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43648/06]
I have been informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the review of licensed aerodromes should be completed later this week. In the circumstances, I am not in a position to comment on the recommendations which may be contained in the report pending its completion and its consideration in the first instance by the Revenue Commissioners.
180 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children if a group (details supplied) have benefitted under the increases announced in Budget 2007; if they will receive the allocation to accommodate another 22 and a half hour post; if there will be provision to allow them get new accommodation as their current accommodation is inadequate; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43459/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
181 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children if her Department will provide adequate funding for a pre-school for the blind and visually impaired (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43499/06]
182 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that a number of people are unable to get a place in a Dublin pre-school (details supplied) due to the lack of resources; if in line with her Department’s commitment to early intervention, she will provide funding to ensure it can continue to operate and more children can avail of the service; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43584/06]
221 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that a number of people are unable to get a place in a Dublin pre-school (details supplied) due to the lack of resources; if she will provide funding to ensure it can continue to operate and more children can avail of the service; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43586/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 181, 182 and 221 together.
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
Furthermore, the Deputy should note that my colleague, Mr. Brian Cowen T.D. and Minister for Finance, allocated additional ongoing funding of €250,000 to the facility referred to by the Deputy in Budget 2007.
183 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of children on the waiting list for the facilities (details supplied); the number of children who have been refused entry to each of these units in 2005 and 2006; the capacity of each unit; the number of children treated at each of these units in the years 2005 and 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43352/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act, 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
184 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of children refused entry to a unit (details supplied) in County Limerick during the time in which it was operating; when this unit will be reopening; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43353/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
185 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Health and Children her views on whether 1600 FÁS community enterprise places should be mainstream State funded personal assistant roles or jobs, as recommended by the Disability Federation of Ireland; if she will acknowledge that approximately 25 to 30 of these provisions would be needed by the Mayo Centre of Independent Living; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43354/06]
In line with the Government decision of 1998, which provided for the mainstreaming of services for people with disabilities, responsibility for the provision of vocational training and employment services transferred from the Department of Health and Children to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment in 2000. At that time an Inter-Departmental Committee, the National Coordination Committee on Training, Work and Employment (NCC), was established to co-ordinate activities during the transition period and to plan for the further development of these services in the following years. The work of the NCC is on-going and it continues to provide a valuable forum for the consideration of new and effective enhancements for these key services.
In the estimates for 2006, significant additional funding totalling €100 million has been included for the improvement of health funded support services for people with disabilities. As part of this provision, funding of €10 million has been made available to address core under-funding and core staffing issues in services provided by the voluntary sector. The Health Service Executive has been asked to allocate this funding on an equitable basis, having regard to the needs of people with disabilities.
I expect that the Executive's consideration of these needs will take into account any urgent case for funding of necessary services currently provided through FÁS employment schemes.
186 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of contract beds provided in private nursing homes in each of the eight Health Service Executive areas in 2004, 2005 and 2006; and the number planned for 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43355/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
187 Ms McManus asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of publicly owned community nursing beds provided in each of the eight Health Service Executive areas in 2004, 2005 and 2006; the number planned for 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43356/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
188 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 17 who is a medical card holder must pay €18 per visit for chiropody care due to a dispute between her Department and chiropodists; the reason the person has been restricted from receiving treatment after 1.30pm during December 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43357/06]
There is no statutory obligation on the Health Service Executive (HSE) to provide chiropody services to GMS patients; however, in practice, arrangements are made to provide these services. Before the establishment of the HSE the nature of the arrangements for chiropody and the level of service provided was a matter for individual health boards and so a degree of variation in practice developed over time. Priority is usually given to certain groups of people, including people who are medical card holders aged 65 years and over. In several regions the service is provided by private chiropodists by arrangement with the HSE.
I consider that it is inappropriate for private chiropodists who are providing services on behalf of the HSE to charge patients a top-up fee, and I have conveyed this view formally to the HSE. My Department requested the HSE to review the fee arrangements in place for the provision of chiropody services, with a view to ensuring that such additional fees will no longer be levied on persons in receipt of this service. I am hopeful that this process, which has been underway for some time, will be concluded soon and that this will ensure that no supplementary charges are levied.
My Department is currently preparing legislation to clarify and update existing legislation on eligibility for health and personal social services. The Bill will define specific health and personal services more clearly; define who should be eligible for what services; set out clear criteria for eligibility; establish when and in what circumstances charges may be made and provide for an appeals framework.
As the Health Service Executive has the operational and funding responsibility for Primary Care services, it is the appropriate body to consider that part of the Deputy's question which relates to appointment times. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
189 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason children attending a private Montessori school (details supplied) in Dublin 22 recognised by her Department cannot access public dental care facilities; the reason they are not eligible for 3 in 1 immunisation at a local public health clinic; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43358/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
190 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Health and Children her plans for the health centre site (details supplied) which has previously been the subject of a planning application by a company; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43359/06]
The Primary Care Strategy aims to develop services in the community to give people direct access to integrated multi-disciplinary teams of general practitioners, nurses, health care assistants, home helps, occupational therapists and others.
It has been estimated that up to 95% of people's health and social services needs can be properly met within a primary care setting and the establishment of new Primary Care Teams can contribute greatly to enhancing community based health services in these areas.
The provision of the appropriate infrastructure for the effective functioning of the teams is being considered by the HSE, having regard to a number of factors. These include the type and configuration of the services involved, the mixed public/private nature of our health system, the suitability of existing infrastructure and the capital requirements of the health services generally over the coming years.
As the Health Service Executive has the operational and funding responsibility for Primary Care services, it is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
191 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Health and Children when the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Unit promised for Limerick will be in service. [43360/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
192 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Health and Children if and when an ADHD specialist will be appointed to the South Eastern Health Board Area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43373/06]
The Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy, entitled ‘A Vision for Change', was launched on 24th January 2006. This provides a framework for action to develop a modern, high quality mental health service over the next 7 to 10 years. In 2006, a sum of €26.2 million was provided for the development of our mental health services in line with "A Vision for Change". A further sum of €25 million has been allocated for 2007 to continue this development.
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
193 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children when a medical card will issue in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43374/06]
Medical cards are made available to persons and their dependants who would otherwise experience undue hardship in meeting the cost of General Practitioner (GP) services. In 2005 the GP visit card was introduced as a graduated benefit so that people on lower incomes, particularly parents of young children, who do not qualify for a medical card would not be deterred on cost grounds from visiting their GP.
Since the beginning of 2005 substantial changes have been made to the way in which people's eligibility for a medical card is assessed and these apply equally to the assessment process for a GP visit card. The income guidelines have been increased by a cumulative 29% and in addition allowance is now made for reasonable expenses incurred in respect of mortgage/rent, childcare and travel to work costs. In June 2006 I agreed with the Health Service Executive a further adjustment to the assessment guidelines for GP visit cards and these are now 50% higher than those in respect of medical cards.
As the Health Service Executive has the operational and funding responsibility for these benefits, it is the appropriate body to consider the particular case raised by the Deputy. My Department has therefore requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to address this matter and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
194 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 265 of 4 July 2006 regarding the status of the development project for a community hospital, day care unit and primary care centre, if she will provide a breakdown of these costings to include the funding estimated for each of the facilities; the timetable for construction; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43400/06]
The Government's sustained high level of investment in healthcare has enabled the completion and commissioning of numerous new facilities in both the acute and the non-acute sectors. This year, the sum available for expenditure in health under the Health Service Executive's capital plan is €555 million.
The HSE has responsibility for the planning and management of capital projects in the health sector, including the development(s) referred to in the Deputy's question. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
195 Mr. J. Higgins asked the Minister for Health and Children when the four neurologists budgeted for 2005 will be appointed. [43419/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular issue raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
196 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the state of rheumatology services here; her plans to implement the Comhairle na nOspidéal report; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43420/06]
In December 2005, Comhairle na nOspidéal published a report on Rheumatology Services which included recommendations on the organisation and development of rheumatology services in the future.
Responsibility for the implementation of these recommendations rests with the Health Service Executive. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
197 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Health and Children the average response time for ambulances on each night of the week. [43426/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall Vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular issue raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
198 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will request the Health Service Executive to review the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; if there are places available in a centre; if a place will be allocated to them there; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43440/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular case raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
199 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will review the decision not to issue a primary medical certificate in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare in view of her reply to Parliamentary Question No. 82 of 13 October 2005; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43441/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
I also wish to bring the Deputy's attention to the Motorised Transport Grant and Mobility Allowance which are administered by the HSE for which the individual may be eligible. The individual concerned should apply to their local HSE office regarding these schemes.
200 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that there is a delay of two years for young children with development co-ordination disorders being able to get an appointment to see an occupational therapist, as evidenced by the case of a child (details supplied) form Cork south west; and if she will put in place adequate facilities for such children. [43458/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
201 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 92 of 6 July 2006, if there has been further progress in relation to the acquisition of the site. [43490/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular issue raised by the Deputy. My Department has again requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
202 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason for the delay in issuing a response to Parliamentary Question No. 203 of 8 November 2006. [43491/06]
My Department requested the HSE to investigate the matter raised by the Deputy. This was done and I wrote to the Deputy on the 8th December outlining the position regarding Home Help Hours in the Kildare/West Wicklow area.
203 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children if tenders have been invited for Phase 3C of Naas General Hospital. [43493/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for considering new capital proposals or progressing those in the health capital programme.
Accordingly, my Department is requesting the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
204 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that the cost of extending BreastCheck to women aged 65 to 70 nationwide is €7 million; if she will provide additional resources to BreastCheck to enable them to implement this extension in tandem with the roll out of BreastCheck to the western and southern regions; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43494/06]
I am committed to ensuring that the BreastCheck service is rolled out to the remaining regions in the country as quickly as possible. I have approved additional revenue funding of €8 million for 2007 to meet the additional costs involved, bringing BreastCheck's revenue budget to €21.7 million in 2007. I have also made available an additional €26.7 million capital funding to BreastCheck for the construction of two new clinical units, five additional mobile units and the provision of state of the art digital equipment. I am pleased that screening will commence in the South and West in the Spring of next year.
When the national roll-out of the programme is sufficiently developed and it is assured that a quality service is being delivered at national level, consideration will be given to including older women and thereby continuing the screening of women in the programme who have reached 65 years of age. Any woman irrespective of her age or residence who has immediate concerns or symptoms should contact her GP who, where appropriate, will refer her to the services in her area.
205 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will direct the Health Service Executive to sanction a further three speech therapists in County Kildare to bring the number up to the complement which was approved prior to the implementation of the employment ceiling. [43495/06]
Over 120,000 people work full-time or part-time in our public health services. In recent years, the Government's ongoing high level of investment in health has achieved and maintained significant increases in the numbers of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals employed in the public health services. The Government has also invested heavily in the education and training of such personnel in order to secure a good supply of graduates to provide for the healthcare needs of the population into the future.
Subject to overall parameters set by Government, the Health Service Executive has the responsibility for determining the composition of its staffing complement. In that regard, it is a matter for the Executive to manage and deploy its human resources to best meet the requirements of its Annual Service Plan for the delivery of health and personal social services to the public. The Executive is the appropriate body to consider the matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
206 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Health and Children the position in the case of a person (details supplied); and if she will ensure they receive a public nursing home place. [43503/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular case raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
207 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the transition arrangements in place between her Department and the Department of Education and Science for children moving into primary school and who had been attending a facility (details supplied). [43504/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
208 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the funding that will be available in 2007 for the purpose of implementing the recently published recreation policy; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43505/06]
The Deputy might wish to note that the national recreation policy for young people has not yet been published but I expect that it will be published during 2007.
The Steering Group overseeing the development of the national recreation policy completed its work last June. Since then, considerable work has been undertaken by my Office in finalising the policy in consultation with relevant Government Departments and Agencies who will have a crucial role to play in the implementation of a range of individual actions.
209 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of public beds in private nursing homes; the locations of these beds; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43506/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
210 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be provided with home help. [43520/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
211 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 750 of 27 September 2006 if she will furnish a response to the issues raised; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43526/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
212 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 747 of 27 September 2006 the position regarding her plans to introduce a screening programme for bowel cancer for 60 to 69 year olds; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43527/06]
As I have previously advised the Deputy, I will shortly establish a National Cancer Screening Service. The Service will, in consultation with the Health Service Executive, advise in relation to a colorectal cancer screening programme. Specifically, the Service will advise on the population to be screened, at what intervals screening should take place, the type of test required and the requirements for a quality assured and well organised cost effective symptomatic service.
213 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the percentage of young people attending the out of hours crisis intervention service who become involved in the criminal justice system; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43557/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy. However, it should be noted that it is unlikely that the Health Service Executive would collate information on those homeless young people who are also involved with the criminal justice system.
214 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the measures her Department has taken to bring about a comprehensive child psychiatric service for children experiencing difficulties; the number of new units, facilities, and staff that have been employed since 2002 for child psychiatric services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43558/06]
216 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the community-based child psychiatric services currently available; her plans to establish such services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43560/06]
217 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the measures in place, or planned to be established to provide a psychiatric service to 17 years olds and younger in order that they do not have to attend adult services which are unsuited to their needs and requirements; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43561/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 214, 216 and 217 together.
The Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy, entitled ‘A Vision for Change', was launched on 24th January 2006. This provides a framework for action to develop a modern, high quality mental health service over the next 7 to 10 years. In 2006, a sum of €26.2 million was provided for the development of our mental health services in line with "A Vision for Change". A further sum of €25 million has been allocated for 2007 to continue this development.
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
215 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the measures her Department has taken to tackle the problem of homelessness among young people here; the action it planned to take towards tackling this crisis in view of the dangers that such children are exposed to due to the vulnerable position in which they find themselves; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43559/06]
The Youth Homelessness Strategy was published on 31st October 2001. The Strategy provides a strategic framework for youth homelessness to be tackled on a national basis. The goal of the Strategy is "to reduce and if possible eliminate youth homelessness through preventative strategies and where a child becomes homeless to ensure that he/she benefits from a comprehensive range of services aimed at reintegrating him/her into his/her community as quickly as possible." There are 12 key objectives in the Strategy divided into three broad categories: preventative measures, responsive services and planning/administrative supports.
Under the strategy, the Health Service Executive, has lead responsibility for implementation of the Strategy and they prepared detailed action plans in this regard to address youth homelessness in line with the objectives set out in the Strategy. The Office of the Minister for Children supported the implementation process by establishing the Youth Homelessness Strategy Monitoring Committee (YHSMC). The Committee is representative of the relevant stakeholders and is chaired by the Office of the Minister for Children.
This Government is committed to the implementation of the Youth Homelessness Strategy, with funding of approximately €12m being allocated to the Health Service Executive for the development of youth homelessness services since 2001.
The Office of the Minister for Children is reviewing the implementation of the Health Service Executive action plans to date and is considering the next steps to be taken in the implementation of the Youth Homelessness Strategy.
218 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for Health and Children the date on which she will introduce the vaccine damage compensation scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43562/06]
The issue of the feasibility of introducing a no-fault compensation scheme for those damaged by vaccination is being considered by my Department. A steering group with specific terms of reference is now being established and it will be asked to furnish its report as a matter of urgency.
219 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Health and Children when a reply will issue from the Health Service Executive to Parliamentary Question No. 98 of 14 June 2006, which according to Parliamentary Question No. 325 of 3 October 2006 was due to issue shortly. [43563/06]
The Health Service Executive has informed my Department that a response has issued to the Deputy.
220 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Health and Children the timeframe for the sexual assault treatment unit for the midlands; the location of the SATU in the region; when it is expected to open; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43585/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the funding, management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
222 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which a person (details supplied) in County Kildare has an entitlement to extended sick leave; if the case will be examined as a matter of urgency; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43592/06]
Over 120,000 people work full-time or part-time in our public health services. In recent years, the Government's ongoing high level of investment in health has achieved and maintained significant increases in the numbers of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals employed in the public health services. The Government has also invested heavily in the education and training of such personnel in order to secure a good supply of graduates to provide for the healthcare needs of the population into the future.
Subject to overall parameters set by Government, the Health Service Executive has the responsibility for determining the composition of its staffing complement. In that regard, it is a matter for the Executive to manage and deploy its human resources to best meet the requirements of its Annual Service Plan for the delivery of health and personal social services to the public. The Executive is the appropriate body to consider the matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
223 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the position in regard to three unsuccessful hip operations which a person (details supplied) in County Kildare underwent at Cappagh Hospital, Dublin; the reason matters have not been concluded or resolved in view of the severe pain which the patient continues to suffer; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43593/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004 and funding for all health services has been provided as part of its overall vote. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular case raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
224 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare can obtain financial assistance towards specialised eye treatment which is not covered by private insurance and without which serious loss of sight will follow; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43594/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this issue examined and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
225 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of searches made in the research section of Civil Registrations in 2005; the number of these that were general searches; the number that were particular searches; the cost of running this section in 2005; the reason there were substantial increases in fees in 2006; if the increased charges for research imposed in 2006 affected the number of searches; the income it generated; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43631/06]
226 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children if, in view of the importance of civil registration as one of the primary sources for genealogy purposes, her Department has explored with other Departments, agencies and institutions a joint approach to making available on-line such information as the 1901 and 1911 census, primary valuation and cancelled valuation books, the tithe records and church records; if such consideration has been given, the outcome of same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43632/06]
227 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children when work on completing the digital format of the civil registration records back to 1845 will be completed; the stage the project is at; when a new research premises will be available to the public; when the new system will be available on-line; if consideration has been given to making the 1901 and 1911 census available at this location in a digitised format; if consideration has been given to the charging regime around the digital format; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43633/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 225 to 227, inclusive, together.
Statutory responsibility for the administration of civil registration in Ireland, which includes the provision of facilities for searching indices to civil registration records, is vested in An tArd-Chláraitheoir (The Registrar General). His office, Oifig an Ard-Chláraitheóra (The General Register Office — GRO) is the central repository for all records, and index books to such records, relating to the civil registration of births, deaths, marriages, domestic adoptions and stillbirths in the State.
I have made enquiries of An tArd-Chláraitheoir regarding the matters raised by the Deputy and he advises me that he does not routinely collect and collate data relating to the numbers of searches, general or otherwise, undertaken at the Research Facility maintained by him at Joyce House, Dublin 1.
The fees for registration services, including the fees for family/genealogical research, were set in 1987. These fees were revised in December 2005. The charge for a particular search increased from €1.90 to €2.00 while the charge for a general search increased from €15.24 to €20.00. The latter represents an increase of 31%. During the period 1987 to 2005 the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by 68%. The increase in fees is justified on the basis that the last increase was in 1987 and a substantial investment has been made in modernising the civil registration system in recent years.
The number of persons presenting at the facility to undertake family history/genealogical research varies from year to year but would average 8000 persons per annum. The income generated from search fees will vary as a consequence but in the current year will be of the order of €240,000. There is no evidence to date to suggest that the fees increase in 2005 has impacted adversely on the numbers availing of the service.
The position in relation to the cost of running the research facility in 2005 is that, as the entire GRO staff complement was located in Joyce House until the decentralisation of GRO to Roscommon in April, 2005 it is not possible to isolate the precise cost of providing the research facility from other costs generally associated with running the entire operation during the period in question. However, based on current salary scales and a notional 40% addition for office facilities and overheads, the estimated cost of providing the research facility is of the order of €400,000 in a full year.
Searching of GRO records for members of the public involves accessing index books to records of births, deaths and marriages and searching these indices in order to identify specific entries in the records and, if required, purchasing either photocopies or certified copies of the identified entries in the records.
The Civil Registration Service has been engaged in a major programme of modernisation in recent years which included the introduction of a computerised civil registration system and a project to capture electronically in excess of 150 years of historical paper records, and their associated indices, relating to life events. Thus far, birth records from 1864 to date, death records from 1924 to date and marriage records from 1920 to date are available on a live computer system. The remainder of the data viz. death records from 1864 to 1923 and marriage records from 1845 to 1919, has been captured electronically but a substantial amount of data cleaning and conversion work is required before it can be released to the computer system. An tArd-Chláraitheoir is unable to give a specific timeframe for the completion of this requirement but it will be considered in the context of planning for the continued development of the service in 2007. It is important to note, however, that the years covered by the data currently available on the computerised Civil Registration System is sufficient to meet the vast majority of the daily business needs of the service.
Part of the modernisation programme includes a project to create an electronically searchable database of the indices to the electronic records. From a research perspective, where the focus of family history researchers and genealogists alike tends to lean towards the retrieval of older records, the creation of an electronic database of indices will facilitate easier and more efficient and effective record searches. It will also facilitate the extension of the availability of the indices beyond the single physical repository, at the moment, of the Research Facility at GRO, Dublin to the wider HSE offices nationwide where civil registration is carried out. A new Research Facility, a feature of which will be electronic research, is being developed at a city centre location, adjacent to public transport services and the refurbishment works and fitting-out required to facilitate its use as such is underway. It is hoped that it will be commissioned towards the middle of 2007 and will be extended in due course to facilitate internet research. I have not, as yet, given any consideration to charges in connection with electronic research.
An tArd-Chláraitheoir is aware that the records he maintains are a valuable source for research purposes and the particular requirements of those engaged in such research are being taken into account in the context of the overall modernisation of the service. The provision of a new research facility is evidence of this and he is satisfied that substantial benefits from its commissioning will accrue to members of the public who wish to avail of the service.
He points out, however, that his primary function is to ensure the delivery of the system of civil registration of births, deaths, marriages, adoptions and stillbirths in the State and to provide for the extension of the system to decrees of divorce and decrees of civil nullity in line with the provisions of the statutes governing civil registration. His office does not engage in family history/genealogical research, which has developed as a spin-off to civil registration.
Plans to make information available on-line in relation to the 1901 and 1911 census, primary valuation and cancelled valuation books, tithe records and church records are a matter for the agencies having ownership or control of those records and do not come within the statutory functions of An tArd-Chláraitheoir.
228 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a promised meeting (details supplied) has not taken place; the further reason phone calls and messages to the Health Service Executive regarding this funding issue are not being responded to; if the situation will be dealt with; if she will expedite the matter; and if she will confirm the way replies to the public are benchmarked relative to efficiency and courtesy of reply. [43650/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
229 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children her views on the establishment of an inter-Departmental body between her Department and the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform to investigate the measures that may be taken to tackle the growing missing persons problem, in view of the latter’s involvement in such matters from a policing perspective and the involvement of her Department from a mental health services perspective; her further views on taking such action also with a view to tackling the growing problem of suicide; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43651/06]
The Garda authorities take direct responsibility for all issues relating to the investigation of the circumstances of missing persons. Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act 2004. Any assistance that the Health Service Executive can give in relation to missing persons is a matter between the HSE and the Garda.
As the Deputy may be aware, the HSE established the National Office for Suicide Prevention following the launch in September 2005 of "Reach Out", a National Strategy for Action on Suicide Prevention. The Office was established to oversee the implementation of the Strategy and to coordinate suicide prevention activities across the State, consult widely in relation to the planning of future initiatives and ensure best practice in suicide prevention.
230 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children if a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be provided with an extra half-hour home help per evening particularly as the medical evidence in this case has been submitted and their general practitioner has submitted an application for same. [43652/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
231 Cecilia Keaveney asked the Minister for Health and Children the position in relation to the outcome of a meeting for a group (details supplied) in County Donegal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43653/06]
The Deputy's question relates to a Lottery Application received from Moville Active Retirement Group. The Department of Health and Children provides funding to voluntary organisations under a National Lottery funded grant scheme. This funding is discretionary. There is a set protocol in place in the Department for dealing with applications/ requests for grants from discretionary National Lottery funds. An application form is made available to any individual, group or agency which requests a grant. When the completed application form is received in the Department it is registered in the Finance Unit and forwarded to the relevant Services Division for their assessment, evaluation and recommendation.
All applications are then considered in the context of the recommendation and the overall level of funds available to the Minister and each organisation is then informed of the decision reached in relation to its application. The lottery application from the above Group will be considered, along with the many applications received this year, in this context.
232 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will arrange for a person (details supplied) in County Cork to be seen by a consultant; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that they are suffering from prostate cancer and have to wait 16 months for an appointment; if she will have them referred to the National Treatment Purchase Fund; and if her attention has been further drawn to the fact that they are in severe pain. [43654/06]
I would be most concerned if a cancer patient had to wait for treatment for the period referred to by the Deputy, especially if the patient is suffering pain.
My Department has requested the Health Service Executive to have the matter examined as a matter of urgency, including the issue of referral under the National Treatment Purchase Fund if appropriate and to respond directly to the Deputy.
233 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children if she has concluded her consideration into the draft code of governance prepared by the Health Service Executive which was submitted to her Department in late September 2006; when she anticipates the final report will be completed and published; if issues raised in the draft report are being considered by her Department or other Departments; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43655/06]
Section 35 of the Health Act, 2004 requires the Health Service Executive to submit a code of governance for my approval.
As you are aware, a draft code of governance has been prepared by the Health Service Executive and was submitted to my Department in late September. The contents of this Code are being assessed and considered by my officials.
I anticipate that the examination of the Code will be complete in the New Year.
The Executive will publish its code of governance once it has been approved by me under section 35 of the Health Act, 2004.
234 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Health and Children the arrangements in place to transfer nursing home residents from private nursing home beds to public facilities; the number of transfers that have taken place within the past year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43656/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular matter raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
235 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Health and Children if, in respect of the 60 person campus complex for people with intellectual disabilities at St. Ita’s Hospital Portrane, she will confirm that funding for the project has been provided by her Department; if further approval from her Department is required to enable the project to proceed; and when it is expected that tenders will be published in the European Journal which is a requirement. [43669/06]
The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for considering new capital proposals or processing those in the health capital programme.
Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
236 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Health and Children when payment will be issued to patients and their families who are due moneys under the nursing home refund scheme; if she will appoint a person in each long stay institution to deal with queries; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43677/06]
The Health (Repayment Scheme) Act 2006 provides a clear legal framework to repay recoverable health charges for publicly funded long term residential care. All those fully eligible persons who were wrongly charged and are alive will have their charges repaid in full. The estates of all those fully eligible persons who were wrongly charged for publicly funded long term residential care and died since 9 December 1998 will have the charges repaid in full. The scheme does not allow for repayments to the estates of those who died prior to that date.
Recoverable health charges are charges which were imposed on persons with full eligibility under the Health (Charges for In-patient Services) Regulations 1976 as amended in 1987 or charges for in-patient services only, raised under the Institutional Assistance Regulations 1954 as amended in 1965.
In relation to dates of repayments to applicants, the HSE has informed the Department that over 21,000 forms have been submitted to the scheme administrator applying for repayments and these applications are being processed at present. The timeframe for repayment is predicated primarily on whether the applicant is alive or whether the application is being made by the estate of a deceased person. Living people who were wrongly charged will be the first to receive payments under the scheme. It is estimated that there are now in the region of 15,000 people within this category. Queries in relation to individual applications should be referred to the scheme administrator.
In addition, the Health Service Executive has put arrangements in place whereby it can make application on behalf of living persons in long stay institutions where there is no other connected person to make an application and where the applicants are unable to apply themselves due to ill health, or mental or physical disability.
The HSE has advised that offers of repayment commenced in November and that the first payments have already issued with further payments continuing on an ongoing basis. It is expected that the bulk of payments to estates will commence in the Spring of 2007. Provision has been made for applications to be received up to 1 January 2008.
A dedicated website www.repay.ie and an information phone line 1890 886 886 have been established by the scheme administrator to assist the public in accessing claim forms and general information on the scheme. The information line operates between the hours of 8.00 am and 9.00 p.m. from Monday to Saturday.
237 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for Health and Children if steps will be taken to investigate the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 20 who was originally committed to a secure unit in Tallaght Hospital in 1999; the reason he was subsequently released from Tallaght Hospital; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43683/06]
Operational responsibility for the management and delivery of health and personal social services was assigned to the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Therefore, the Executive is the appropriate body to consider the particular case raised by the Deputy. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.
238 Mr. English asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources when an applicant (details supplied) will have an application to get listed finalised with Sustainable Energy Ireland as a product or supplier; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43414/06]
It is a requirement that all equipment registered under the Greener Homes Scheme must meet recognised quality and performance standards. I understand that Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) have been in contact with the individual concerned regarding the registration of his product and that they are awaiting clarification of certain details. Once the required information is received SEI will finalise its assessment in order to ensure that the equipment is compliant with the required standards.
239 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the annual cost of the Greener Homes grant scheme, delivered through Sustainable Energy Ireland on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; the number of new units of housing and existing units of housing that installed a renewable energy heating system under the scheme for each year for which figures are supplied; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year under the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43415/06]
The Greener Homes Scheme was launched in March 2006 and it provides support to homeowners to invest in a range of renewable energy heating technologies including wood biomass boilers and stoves, heat pumps and solar technology.
In the 34 week period since the scheme commenced a total of €2.476m has been paid out in grant aid to 775 householders. Grant aid of €1,100 to €6,500 was paid depending on the individual technology used.
240 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the annual cost of the biofuels scheme II, on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; if he will quantify the activity generated by the scheme for each year for which figures are supplied; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year under the scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43416/06]
The successful applicants under the Biofuels Mineral Oil Tax Relief Scheme II were announced on 23 November 2006. Under the scheme no direct payments are made to individuals. The successful applicants under the scheme will be exempt from paying excise on the production of specified amounts of biofuels.
The scheme, which is being rolled out over a five year period, will cost in excess of €200m in excise foregone to end 2010. Officials in my Department are currently liaising with successful applicants with a view to providing a schedule of roll-out over the five years of the scheme, including 2007.
241 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the post offices, sub-post offices and postal agents which have been closed for each of the years 1997 to date in 2006. [43431/06]
The closure of individual post offices is in the first instance a matter for the board and management of An Post and one in which I have no function.
An Post has supplied the following information.
|
Year |
Company Staffed Branch Offices Closed |
Contractor-operated offices Closed |
Postal Agents Closed |
|
Jan. 1997 |
— |
19 |
— |
|
1998 |
— |
22 |
— |
|
1999 |
— |
10 |
— |
|
2000 |
— |
31 |
— |
|
2001 |
— |
62 |
— |
|
2002 |
— |
19 |
2 |
|
2003 |
— |
75 |
52 |
|
2004 |
1 |
19 |
17 |
|
2005 |
— |
19 |
16 |
|
2006 |
— |
17 |
10 |
242 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources his views on a directive or legislation in relation to a possible fuel variation provision having to be considered by CER in its regulation of gas and electricity prices. [43432/06]
I would advise the Deputy that I have no function in the matter. Electricity and gas tariffs are the statutory responsibility of the Commission for Energy Regulation, under the Electricity Regulation Act, 1999, as amended by the Gas (Interim) (Regulation) Act, 2002, and the European Communities (Internal Market in Electricity) Regulations 2005.
I am advised that the CER has stated its intention re-examine fuel cost variation mechanisms in tariffs and will develop a consultation paper on this topic before the end of 2006. No additional legislative measures are required as the existing legislation allows the CER to consider such changes to tariff structures.
243 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the terms of reference of the Indecon consultancy on Ireland’s natural resources; when he expects to have the report; and if he will introduce legislation on the matter before the general election. [43433/06]
The terms of reference for the consultancy project to review the current licensing regime are as follows:
Consideration of the Department's views on how the licensing regime could best be changed, as set out in two reports covering fiscal and non-fiscal terms respectively.
Advice on any alternative fiscal regimes which could better achieve the objectives.
Advice on peer countries (comparable in terms of size or petroleum development) considering relative tax and royalty burdens and other licence terms vs. objectives.
A quantitative analysis of the preferred regime (underlying model, specific details — thresholds, rates etc.).
Advice on any additional non-fiscal features considered beneficial to the State.
The report of the consultants is due this month. I shall consider the report and its recommendations before bringing my proposals to Government early in the new year.
244 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will make a statement on further discussions he has held with Eircom, e-net, BT or other telecom providers in relation to the full broadband enablement of all parts of Ireland; if and when he will introduce a tendering process for this project; and the anticipated cost to the Exchequer. [43434/06]
The provision of telecommunications services, including broadband, is a matter in the first instance for the private sector companies operating in a fully liberalised market. There are many areas of the country where for demographic or other reasons the private sector has been slow to respond to demand for broadband. In cases where the market is seen to have failed, my Department is addressing the investment shortfall in infrastructure using a combination of Government and ERDF funding through the Regional Broadband Programme.
Despite Government investment in broadband in the regions through the regional broadband programme, there are still some parts of the country where the private sector will be unable to justify the commercial provision of broadband connectivity. Options to address the gaps in broadband coverage are currently being considered by a Steering Group comprising officials from my Department and representatives from ComReg. The Steering Group has met with representatives from the various technology platforms through which a service can be delivered. I expect to finalise proposals shortly.
245 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will report on the quotas and TACs sought by the EU Fisheries Commission for 2007 and on the priorities for the Irish negotiating team in Brussels in December 2006; and if this will include further invigilation of gill nets. [43435/06]
The draft Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and Quotas Regulation for 2007 was published by the EU Commission on the 5th December 2006, and will be decided on at the Council of Agriculture and Fisheries Ministers next week from the 19th to 21st December 2006.
I met with our industry representatives on Tuesday in order to discuss the proposed EU Regulation and to identify our priorities for the Council. I will have further discussions with the industry on an ongoing basis throughout these negotiations at Council.
My primary aim, together with the Department, is to ensure that all Irish fishermen will have the maximum possible quantity and range of fishing possibilities that can be justified on a sustainable basis, available to them in 2007.
With regard to gill nets, the EU Commission has proposed a number of regulatory measures on the advice of its Scientific Committee and I will be seeking to have these measures adopted.
246 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the way the new regulations will affect draft net fishermen on the River Boyne (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43498/06]
I recently published the draft Wild Salmon and Sea Trout Tagging Scheme Regulations and made them available for public consultation up until 17 December 2006. The regulation provides for the revised quotas for the taking of salmon (including sea trout over 40 centimetres) by commercial fishing engines and the introduction of a quota for anglers. The quotas are to be allocated on a river-by-river basis. The draft regulation, sets out the Total Allowable Catch that may be taken by commercial fishing engines and rod and line on a river by river basis and by river catchments.
The scientific advice of the Standing Scientific Committee of the National Salmon Commission indicates that the River Boyne is not reaching its conservation limit and in the circumstances there is no quota for salmon and sea trout that may be taken by commercial fishing engines and rod and line in 2007.
247 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources when the report of the interdepartmental committee on the health effects of mobile phones will be published. [43550/06]
The Expert Group on Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, established by the Inter-Departmental Committee to provide science-based advice, will shortly finalise its report. This report will provide a review of the most up-to-date international expert consensus of the totality of the scientific evidence available.
The Inter-Departmental Committee will then complete its consideration of the Expert Group's report and will provide advice to Government on the appropriate action to be taken on foot of the recommendations contained in the report of the Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, published in June 2005.
248 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if funding has been provided for a pier (details supplied) in County Mayo; the amount provided; and when work can be expected to start on the upgrading of this pier. [43644/06]
Porturlin Pier is owned by Mayo County Council and responsibility for its repair and maintenance rests with the local authority in the first instance.
In 2002 Mayo County Council engaged consultants to carry out a Feasibility Study and Preliminary Report for harbour improvements at Porturlin Pier. In order to proceed with the project the County Council sought funding of €200,000 from the Department towards Site Investigations and Planning Permission in 2004. The Department had no Exchequer funding available for this project in 2004 or 2005.
Under the 2006 Small Harbours Programme I approved grant aid of €112,500 to Mayo County Council towards a Site Investigation and Feasibility Study at Porturlin at a total cost of €150,000. I understand the study is under way at present and a report will be available shortly.
The question of providing funding for development at Porturlin in 2007 will be considered taking account of the results of the Study and Site Investigation and the amount of funding available for works at fishery harbours generally and overall national priorities.
249 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will report on the recent EU Communications Ministers meeting on mobile phone roaming charges; the Irish Government’s policy in this regard; when EU-wide action will be taken against roaming charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43671/06]
I attended the EU Ministerial Council on Monday 11 December 2006. Roaming charges were on the agenda. At the meeting I strongly supported the Commission proposals to protect mobile phone users from excessive roaming charges.
The issue of high roaming charges is one that I take very seriously and one that I raised at my first Telecoms Council meeting when I took over this brief. I have repeatedly made my position on this issue known to the telecommunications sector in Ireland and I have called for action by them to reduce costs to the consumer in this area. Earlier this year I was very encouraged when operators in Ireland introduced tariff initiatives to address the issue of Northern Ireland roaming following a direct call from me to do so. I will continue to work to get movement at a European level on this issue.
The Commission's draft regulation is currently being negotiated in the Council Working Group and debated in the European Parliament. I hope that agreement on the proposed Regulation will be reached in 2007.
250 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he has set 2012 as the date for switching off the analogue signal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43673/06]
A digital terrestrial television (DTT) pilot programme is currently being implemented by my Department. The purpose of the pilot is to bring further momentum to the transition to digital terrestrial broadcasting and to test and trial various aspects of the service.
The DTT pilot is now in the "soft trial" phase during which the network and user technologies will be tested. The initial transmission sites are at Clermont Carn in the northeast and Three Rock covering parts of the Dublin region. The trial is planned to continue over a two-year timeframe and will provide the opportunity for technical and user testing of both existing and new broadcast services, including both television and audio services.
My Department is preparing legislation with regard to DTT with a view to facilitating a national roll-out.
It is anticipated that the pilot will generate awareness and discussion among interested parties in a full national roll-out of digital terrestrial television. As the trial progresses and proposals are developed for a national rollout of digital terrestrial television, the question of possible analogue switch-off dates will be considered.
Switch-off of analogue television services is being strongly advocated by the European Commission, with 2012 a target date suggested by the Commission. While the pilot is under way, I intend to hold discussions with all relevant stakeholders around the issue of digital switchover.
When decisions have been taken about the nature and timing of analogue switch over, it will be necessary to ensure that Irish viewers are fully informed of all the issues arising.
251 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he will establish a tendering process to achieve the 100% broadband enablement of Ireland; the amount this process will cost; the timeframe for commencement of the tendering process; the way he will structure the tendering process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43674/06]
The provision of telecommunications services, including broadband, is a matter in the first instance for the private sector companies operating in a fully liberalised market. There are many areas of the country where for demographic or other reasons the private sector has been slow to respond to demand for broadband. In cases where the market is seen to have failed, my Department is addressing the investment shortfall in infrastructure using a combination of Government and ERDF funding through the Regional Broadband Programme.
Despite Government investment in broadband in the regions through the regional broadband programme, there are still some parts of the country where the private sector will be unable to justify the commercial provision of broadband connectivity. Options to address the gaps in broadband coverage are currently being considered by a Steering Group comprising officials from my Department and representatives from ComReg. I expect to finalise proposals shortly.
252 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he is still examining proposals for a new semi-State telecoms company; if Project Dingle is still under consideration in his Department; the discussions he has had with all the relevant semi-State bodies regarding the telecommunications infrastructure and the development of a new telecoms operation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43675/06]
In April 2005 a team of advisers was engaged to examine the potential for enhancing and augmenting existing state owned infrastructure. This team submitted a Feasibility Report in December 2005. The report found that, while technically feasible, there would be considerable financial, legal, regulatory, operational and organisational challenges in harnessing and enhancing the existing state owned infrastructures. My Department is considering options to enhance competitive backhaul connectivity.
253 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the cost to date of phase 1 of the MANs; the estimated cost of phases 2 and 3 of the MANs; the amount of the MANs network that is currently lit; the level of uptake on the MANs; if he will report on the recent contact his Department has had with the MANs operator; if he will continue with the current level of funding, if the present multi-million euro level of losses continues; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43676/06]
The total cost of Phase One of the Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs) was approximately €85 million. Phase Two is estimated to cost in the region of €140 million.
The 27 Phase One networks are complete and open for business. They have been handed over to the Management Services Entity, e-net, who manage, market and maintain the networks on behalf of the State. e-net had sixty-nine customer contracts in place with service providers by the end of October 2006.
My Department maintains regular contact with e-net to ensure that it is meeting its obligations. e-net's contractual obligations for the management, operation and maintenance of the MANs are set out in the Concession Agreement between my Department and e-net. Tight controls exist within the Concession Agreement to closely monitor e-net's performance. e-net formally reports to my Department on a quarterly basis and is obliged to file various documents throughout the contract term dealing with its activities. e-net also publishes an annual set of accounts.
254 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if he will approve an application under the Access II programme for a project (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43522/06]
An independent selection committee is currently assessing the applications received under ACCESS II and will provide me with recommendations early in 2007. I understand that an application in respect of the project in question was received.
255 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if he will confirm that has Department has received an application for sports capital funding from an organisation (details supplied) in County Westmeath; and the steps he will take to ensure that same is favourably considered due to the ambitious project being undertaken; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43575/06]
The sports capital programme, which is administered by my Department, allocates funding to sporting and community organisations at local, regional and national level throughout the country. The programme is advertised on an annual basis.
Applications for funding under the 2007 programme were invited through advertisements in the Press on October 15th and 16th last. The closing date for receipt of applications was Friday November 24th last. All applications received before the deadline, including one from the organisation in question, will be evaluated against the programme's assessment criteria, which are outlined in the guidelines, terms and conditions of the programme. I intend to announce the grant allocations for the programme as soon as possible after the assessment process has been completed.
256 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the reason a company (details supplied) which was fined in the UK in 2005 for facilitating the sending of unwanted reverse charged premium rate text messages is allowed to do so here. [43336/06]
257 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a company (details supplied) is operating a premium rate mobile phone line that targets customers of another company offering alleged cash and credit prizes and which customers’ credit is taken from them simply by receiving the unsolicited text messages. [43337/06]
258 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a company (details supplied) is operating reversed charged premium rate text competitions here for which it was fined by the UK regulator; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43339/06]
259 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the legal status of Regtel, the independent regulator of the Irish telecom sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43341/06]
260 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if there is a means whereby mobile phone customers can be compensated for unsolicited reverse charge premium rate text messages. [43343/06]
261 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the action that can be taken by persons or the State against mobile phone operators who are in breach of EU Directive on Privacy and Electronics Communications 2003 in relation to unsolicited text messages from commercial companies. [43344/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 256 to 261, inclusive, together.
I would advise the Deputy that I do not have any function or responsibility in relation to regulating the activities of mobile phone service providers. Furthermore, I have no function or responsibility in respect of the charges imposed by such service providers. Nor have I any function or responsibility in regard to the operation of Regtel which I understand is a private limited company.
Similarly, I do not have any responsibility in relation to the enforcement of the EC (Electronic Communications Networks and Services) (Data Protection and Privacy) Regulations 2003. These regulations were made by the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources.
Where I do have Ministerial responsibility is in relation to consumer law but the Deputy's question does not contain enough detail to allow me to form a judgment as to whether or not any breach of existing consumer law might arise in relation to these matters. I have, however, brought the substance of the Deputy's questions to the attention of the Director of Consumer Affairs. If the Deputy believes that a breach of consumer law arises, I would urge him to communicate with the Director and to provide her with as much information as possible in order to allow a judgment to be made in that respect.
262 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of new foreign companies and jobs brought by the IDA to the mid-west in 2006; the breakdown by county and company location of where the jobs will be; the number of visits by potential foreign investors organised by the IDA to the region; the breakdown of the sites the potential investors visited; and his views on the outlook for foreign direct investment opportunities in 2007 in the mid-west. [43370/06]
State support for enterprise and job creation is channelled through the industrial development agencies. IDA Ireland has statutory responsibility for the attraction of foreign direct investment to the Mid-West, except for the Shannon Free Zone, which falls within the remit of Shannon Development.
While IDA Ireland is actively marketing all areas within their remit, including the Mid-West, for new investment projects and jobs, decisions regarding where to locate, including what areas to visit as potential locations are ultimately taken by investors. IDA Ireland inform me that they hosted 23 site visits to County Limerick, 5 site visits to County Clare and 2 site visits to North Kerry this year. So far this year IDA Ireland hosted no site visits to North Tipperary.
While agreements entered into between IDA Ireland and individual investors are confidential by nature and not always announced, the following announcements were made in 2006:
In March 2006 Vistakon announced it is to invest over €100 million in its Limerick Manufacturing facility. This development is part of Vistakon's aggressive growth strategy to capitalise on the global contact lens market's huge potential.
In September 2006 Northern Trust announced its decision to locate its second fund administration centre in Limerick, which lead to the creation of over 300 jobs. In addition R&D expenditure of over €10m has been committed in four separate projects during 2006 in Limerick.
The Forfás Annual Employment Survey records jobs gained and lost in companies supported by the industrial development agencies. Data are compiled on an annualised basis and data for 2006 will not be available until mid-2007. The following table provide details of the number of IDA supported companies, total employment in these companies and jobs gained and lost in each of the Mid-West counties for 2005.
IDA Ireland advise me that the Mid-West has excellent prospects in terms of attracting additional foreign direct investment in 2007 and beyond. In particular, IDA Ireland believe there is very significant scope for the region to grow as a centre of excellence in research and development activity. The IDA, through its partnership with University of Limerick (UL) and the various Institutes of Technology throughout the region, is strongly promoting this concept. In addition, UL in collaboration with Science Foundation Ireland in appointing world-renowned researchers has greatly added to the reputation and attraction of the region as a centre for research and development.
I am confident that the strategies being pursued by IDA Ireland will continue to bear fruit in terms of additional investment and jobs for the people of the Mid-West.
|
County |
Clare |
North Kerry |
Limerick |
North Tipperary |
|
Employment Data |
2005 |
2005 |
2005 |
2005 |
|
No. of Companies |
9 |
11 |
38 |
6 |
|
Permanent Jobs |
1,024 |
1,026 |
8,633 |
717 |
|
Job Gains (New Jobs) |
129 |
89 |
374 |
38 |
|
Job Losses |
-34 |
-15 |
-127 |
-83 |
|
Net Change in Employment |
95 |
74 |
247 |
-45 |
263 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of new foreign companies and jobs brought by Shannon Development in 2006; the number of visits by potential foreign investors organised by Shannon Development to the region; the breakdown of the sites the potential investors visited; and his views on the outlook for foreign direct investment opportunities in 2007 in the Shannon free zone. [43371/06]
Shannon Development is responsible for promoting foreign direct investment in the Shannon Free Zone. In 2006, Shannon Development hosted 11 first time itineraries to the Shannon Free Zone on behalf of companies. 20 new enquiries have been handled by Shannon Development in the course of the year to date. These inquiries are at various stages of progression. By year end, investment proposals on behalf of three new companies seeking to establish operations at the Shannon Free Zone will have been considered by Shannon Development.
In 2006, two sizable company expansions, Halifax Ireland and Sykes International, and one sizable new operation, Digital River Ireland, were announced for the Shannon Free Zone, amounting to a total job creation potential of 635 jobs over the next five years.
Shannon Development is confident that it will continue to secure significant new foreign direct investment projects for the Shannon Free Zone in the future.
264 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 290 of 20 June 2006, the progress to date on the inspection regime under the metrology law; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43397/06]
265 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the role his Department has in monitoring the weighing equipment in meat slaughtering facilities; the number of discrepancies in such plants and the plants involved in each of the past two years; the last date on which each meat plant was inspected and equipment calibrated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43398/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 264 and 265 together.
The Deputy will be aware of the background to this matter from previous replies.
Weighing equipment used for trade is subject to control by the Legal Metrology Service in accordance with the Metrology Acts 1980 to 1998. The regime of control includes approval of new designs of weighing equipment, verification of instruments of an approved design upon installation and following repair or recalibration, and inspection over the life of the instruments.
Limited inspections of meat plants are continuing to be undertaken; 10 meat plants have been visited since June 2006. No breaches of the legislation requiring prosecution were found in the past two years.
The tabular statement contains details of the dates of last visits to meat plants.
As the Deputy was previously advised, a full programme of inspections for weighing equipment in meat processing plants will not be possible until an industrial relations issue relating to the hiring of private hauliers for the conveyance and lifting of test equipment is resolved.
A Labour Relations Commission hearing on 27 March 2006 was unsuccessful in resolving the matter and further negotiations are ongoing between management and staff representatives. An external facilitator was engaged and negotiations commenced in July 2006. It is expected that these will conclude shortly. Should the matter remain unresolved following these negotiations, it will be referred back for hearing by the Labour Relations Commission.
|
Name & Location of Meat Plant |
Visit Dates |
|
AIBP Bandon |
02/04/2004 |
|
AIBP Cahir |
11/01/2005 |
|
AIBP Clones |
22/05/2006 |
|
AIBP Dromod |
03/10/2001 |
|
AIBP Longford |
12/02/2002 |
|
AIBP Nenagh |
02/06/2006 |
|
AIBP Rathkeale |
26/05/2006 |
|
AIBP Roscrea |
24/04/2002 |
|
Ashbourne Meats, Naas |
24/04/2002 |
|
Ashbourne Meats, Roscrea |
23/08/2006 |
|
Dawn Meats, Ballaghadreen |
09/05/2006 |
|
Dawn Meats, Ballyhaunis |
26/09/2001 |
|
Dawn Meats, Kilmacthomas |
04/03/2004 |
|
Dawn Meats, Rathdowney |
19/02/2004 |
|
Donegal Meat Processors, Carrigans |
07/12/2006 |
|
Exel Meats, Kilbeggan |
18/04/2004 |
|
Fair Oak Foods, Bagenalstown |
16/03/2000 |
|
Glenside Bacon, Glenties |
23/03/2006 |
|
Jennings, Ballinrobe |
27/02/2002 |
|
Kepak, Ballymahon |
12/12/2006 |
|
Kepak, Clonee |
06/06/2006 |
|
Kepak, Hacketstown |
12/07/2006 |
|
Kepak, Athleague |
17/02/2006 |
|
Kepak, Clonee |
06/07/2006 |
|
Kildare Chilling, Kildare |
04/04/2003 |
|
Liffey Meats, Ballyjamesduff |
06/03/2006 |
|
McGavigan Meats, Lifford |
21/06/2006 |
|
Meadow Meats, Rathdowney |
24/02/2006 |
|
Moyvalley Meats, Broadford |
01/10/2001 |
|
Newgrange Meats, Navan |
10/07/2006 |
|
QK Coldstores, Grannagh |
05/05/2005 |
|
QK Coldstores, Kilmacthomas |
27/07/2005 |
|
Riverview Meats, Lifford |
15/06/2006 |
|
Slaney Meats, Bunclody |
18/05/2005 |
|
Vanstar, Jamestown, Co. Leitrim |
28/11/2003 |
266 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his views on the recent inspections carried out by the International Transport Workers’ Federation on board a ship (details supplied) whose shipments operate between the United Kingdom and Ireland, which resulted in the recovery of $168,871 for unpaid wages and the revelation of a number of other abuses of seafarers’ rights; and if he will re-examine protections afforded to seafarers working in Irish waters. [43500/06]
The named merchant vessel is not registered under the Irish flag. The wages and conditions of employment of workers on board that vessel are, therefore, governed by the flag State's legislation (in this case, Jamaica) and neither I nor the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment have any responsibilities in these matters.
I understand that the vessel is subject to Port State Control (PSC) inspections in Ireland under the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)/EU Directive 95/21/EC. PSC inspections, which are undertaken by Marine Surveyors of the Department of Transport, include, amongst other items, inspection of the vessels living and working conditions as regulated under the current International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions and in this case ILO 147/ ILO 180, which Ireland has ratified.
As Deputies know, the Government has already communicated its intention to engage fully and effectively in the process of devising policies and measures which would protect employment standards and arrest a race to the bottom in terms of employment practices. I am confident that a successful response to these issues can be found for our economy, where the very particular legal and other characteristics of the marine sector do not apply. I believe they are best found within the context of a social partnership agreement, which continues the stability and progressive modernisation of our labour force and employment practices in order to sustain jobs and living standards. In this regard the Social Partnership Agreement "Towards 2016" sets out a number of commitments with regard to the improvement of employment standards and compliance.
In addition to the measures contained in Towards 2016, a new Maritime Labour Convention was adopted in February 2006 at the 94th International Labour Organization in Geneva. Ireland fully supports the new Convention and voted in favour of the proposal.
At a national level Ireland has consistently supported the International Labour Organisation in its efforts to promote decent global labour standards for seafarers and was represented at the 94th Convention by a tripartite delegation consisting of government officials, nominees of the employers (IBEC) and of the workers (ICTU). The new Convention sets out clear principles and rights for seafarers.
267 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the measures being taken to secure a replacement industry for a plant (details supplied) in County Kildare, the closure of which was recently announced; the supports his Department will provide to the workers to assist in securing new jobs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43629/06]
The full services of the Industrial Training agency FÁS, will be made available to the workers in question if they wish to avail of the agency's services.
In recent years, a number of world-class manufacturing companies such as Intel, Wyeth Medica and Hewlett Packard have been attracted to Co. Kildare. As regards Naas itself, in May of this year, I announced a major investment of €28m by Dawn Farm Foods Ltd with support from Enterprise Ireland. A total of 100 new jobs will be created. A major expansion by Green Isle Foods is under way and on target. The Millennium Park in the town has three modern advance office buildings available for marketing to investors. A financial services company has already established in the Park.
According to the most recent Quarterly National Household Survey published by the Central Statistics Office on 30 November, the numbers in employment in the Mid-East region, of which Naas is a part, continue to grow. The numbers increased from 225,600 people in the second quarter of 2006 to 231,800 in the third quarter. This represents a continuing strong rise of over 20,000 in the number of people in employment in the region over the last two years.
I am satisfied that the efforts of the Industrial Development agencies will continue to attract investment and job opportunities to the area.
268 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the measures he has taken to secure redundancy payments for workers in a company (details supplied) in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43630/06]
Two hundred and forty-four employees who were made redundant between 20 October 2006 and 10 November 2006 from the company concerned have been paid their full statutory redundancy entitlements from the Social Insurance Fund. Most of these claims were processed through our new on line redundancy payments system and paid within four weeks of receipt.
There are no further claims on hand at the present time. If further claims are received in this Department, they will be processed without delay.
269 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 185 of 29 November 2006 if he will expedite a decision on the request for a work visa for a person (details supplied) in Dublin 9; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43646/06]
The Work Permits Section of my Department informs me that it still has no record of a work permit application in this case as previously indicated in Parliamentary Question No. 185 of 29 November 2006.
270 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will acknowledge that the increase given to people in receipt of disability benefit in Budget 2007 was insufficient in view of the fact that research done by the Disability Federation of Ireland recommended that it be increased by €40 per week; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43347/06]
Budget 2007 delivered the largest increase in social welfare spending in the history of the State with a package of over €1.4 billion. The total social welfare spending in 2007 will exceed €15.3 billion and this funding will directly support and benefit one and a half million people.
In its pre-Budget submission, the Disability Federation of Ireland made two recommendations; firstly that the rate of Disability Allowance be increased by €20 per week which, as outlined above, has been achieved and, secondly that a cost of disability payment at a rate of €40 per week be introduced, commencing with the recipients of the means-tested disability allowance payment. There are currently over 83,000 recipients of disability allowance.
A working group established under the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness (PPF), with cross-departmental membership which includes my Department and chaired by the Department of Health and Children, has examined the feasibility of the introduction of a cost of disability payment. The National Disability Authority, on behalf of the working group and in line with its own remit, commissioned research into the feasibility of the introduction of such a payment. The purpose of this research was to advise regarding the additional costs incurred by people with disabilities, owing specifically to the direct or indirect costs of disability and the appropriate mechanisms or instruments by which to address identified additional costs. The resultant report, Disability and the Cost of Living, was subsequently published by the National Disability Authority.
The group considers it vital that comprehensive data be available on which to base consideration of the introduction of a cost of disability payment, in addition to a structured process of the assessment of need. The working group recommended that steps be taken to improve the quality of data relating to disability in Ireland, for example, adjustment of existing data gathering exercises undertaken by the Central Statistics Office. This will be addressed in the disability survey currently being undertaken by the CSO.
The group has also examined the scope for addressing barriers that exist for people with disabilities who wish to undertake or increase their employment and thus move to a position of greater economic independence. In this regard, as part of the Social Welfare Budget package 2006, I introduced a change to the withdrawal rate of Disability Allowance and Blind Pension for income in excess of the current earnings disregard level which means that a single person can earn up to a maximum of €390 per week from rehabilitative employment before their Disability Allowance or Blind Pension is fully withdrawn. The outcome of this change will be monitored to assess its effect on increased employment participation and to identify any further policy changes required.
In terms of ensuring adequate levels of income for people with disabilities, the current ten-year Social Partnership Agreement, Towards 2016, includes the commitment to work for the continued enhancement and integration of supports in line with overall social welfare targets. These will include a rationalisation of existing allowances for people with disabilities in the context of the Government's policy of mainstreaming and the transfer of functions from the Health Services Executive to my Department which includes a number of disability-related schemes, including the Domiciliary Care Allowance, Mobility Allowance and Blind Welfare Allowance. An inter-departmental working group has now been established to progress the implementation of this transfer. Other issues around the cost of disability will be considered following the development of a needs assessment system provided for under Part 2 of the Disability Act, 2005.
My Department's Disability Sectoral Plan similarly contains actions in relation to the rationalisation of existing allowances for people with disabilities. The Plan also includes agreed protocols with the Department of Health and Children and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment on actions required to ensure that income supports and associated benefits do not create financial barriers to people with disabilities participating in the labour force or availing of training, educational or other developmental opportunities.
I look forward to the implementation of the sectoral plan over the next three years and to continuing the commitment to expand and deliver services that best support, recognise and encourage people with disabilities as well as those who provide a caring role.
271 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when mortgage supplement will be awarded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43615/06]
290 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when mortgage supplement will be awarded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare;; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43616/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 271 and 290 together.
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme which includes rent and mortgage interest supplements is administered on behalf of my Department by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive.
The Executive has advised that while it has received a mortgage interest application from the person concerned it has requested additional information together with supporting documentation so that a decision can be made in this case. The Executive has further advised that it has not yet received the documentation requested.
273 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when an illness benefit appeal for a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be finalised. [43361/06]
Payment of disability benefit (now known as illness benefit) to the person concerned was discontinued from 28 August 2006 following an examination by a Medical Assessor of the Department on 15 August 2006 who expressed the opinion that he was capable of work. The person appealed this decision and in that context he was examined by another Medical Assessor on 5 October 2006 who also expressed the opinion that he was capable of work. In accordance with the statutory procedures the relevant departmental papers and the comments of the Deciding Officer were also sought.
The papers have now been referred to an Appeals Officer who proposes to hold an oral hearing in the case as soon as possible. The person is currently in receipt of jobseeker's allowance pending the resolution of his appeal.
Under Social Welfare Legislation decisions in relation to claims must be made by Deciding Officers and Appeals Officers. These officers are statutorily appointed and I have no role in regard to making such decisions.
274 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be approved and awarded the respite care grant; and if it will be backdated to 2005. [43363/06]
The person to whom the Deputy refers submitted an application for Respite Care Grant which was received in the Department on 27 November 2006. This application was treated as an application for the 2005 Respite Care Grant. A decision not to award the Respite Care Grant in this case was made by a Deciding Officer on 30th November 2006. Amongst the documentary information relied upon by the Deciding Officer was the opinion of a medical assessor who, on examination of the medical evidence submitted with the application, was of the view that the person being cared for was not so incapacitated as to require full time care and attention.
The person submitted additional medical evidence on the 6th December 2006 for review of the decision. In reviewing the original decision, the Deciding Officer sought the opinion of the Chief Medical Adviser who, having examined the additional medical evidence submitted, was of the view that the person being cared for is not so incapacitated as to require full time care and attention. Accordingly, the Deciding Officer confirmed the original decision and a letter outlining this decision was issued on the 13th December 2006.
The most recent correspondence from the person concerned is being treated as an appeal against the original decision and is being forwarded to the independent Social Welfare Appeals Office for their consideration.
275 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he was consulted prior to the enactment of the Health Amendment Act 2005 as to the implications of charging persons on social welfare payments up to 80% of those payments for their time in residential care facilities; if consideration was in particular given to the impact such a charge would have on persons with intellectual or physical disabilities who have or will spend the majority of their lives in residential care; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43365/06]
Normal inter-departmental procedures were followed in the course of preparation of the Act in question prior to the decision of Government. The consideration of relevant issues raised in that context would be a matter for my colleague the Minister for Health and Children.
With regard to the income support arrangements for people with disabilities, the improvements made to the Disability Allowance (DA) scheme since its transfer from the Health Boards to my Department in 1996 mean that many of those who had previously been disqualified for payment under the former DPMA scheme because they were in residential care are now entitled to payment under the DA scheme. Furthermore, people who are living in community-based residences are eligible to receive DA provided the relevant Health Board is not providing funding towards their maintenance.
However, the position of people in residential care since prior to August 1999, or those who entered residential care subsequent to that date without an entitlement to DA, has been that they are disqualified from receipt of this payment solely because of their residency.
This situation was partially addressed in Budget 2005 when I introduced a new Disability Allowance (Personal Expenses Rate) to 2,700 people in residential care who qualified for this payment. This payment replaced the pocket money (spending allowances) which had previously been paid to some of these residents by the Health Services Executive but at the standardised and generally higher rate of €35 per week. The weekly levels of the pocket money allowance previously had varied between Health Service Executive areas.
As part of Budget 2007, the disqualification has been removed so that all persons in residential care will have an income maintenance payment on the same basis (in effect abolishing the disqualification and the Disability Allowance (Personal Expenses Rate)). The removal of the disqualification will ensure that persons in receipt of DA in residential care are treated in the same way as other social welfare recipients.
Arrangements are now being made to extend the payment of DA, at the rate appropriate to their means, to approximately 2,700 people in residential care. This measure will be effective from 3 January 2007 and payments will be made in accordance with the joint level service agreements in place between my Department and the service providers. The payments to the people concerned will be treated in the same way as other Disability Allowance payments and in line with the protocols of the Health Services Executive for monies paid by my Department on behalf of persons in residential care.
276 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when family income supplement will be awarded to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43381/06]
Family Income Supplement (FIS) is designed to provide income support for employees on low earnings with children and thereby preserve the incentive to remain in employment in circumstances where the employee might only be marginally better off than if s/he were claiming other Social Welfare payments.
My Department received an application for Family Income Supplement from the person concerned on 17 October 2006.
It was necessary for her application to be referred to a Social Welfare Inspector for investigation.
These investigations have not yet been concluded. The application will be decided on completion of these investigations and a decision communicated to the person concerned.
277 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the conclusions and recommendations of the long-term care working group established in January 2005; the progress made with their report; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43382/06]
My colleague the Minister for Health and Children and I established the Working Group on Long Term Care in January 2005. The group is chaired by the Department of An Taoiseach and comprises senior officials from the Departments of Finance, Health and Children and my own Department.
The objective of this Group was to identify the basic policy options for a financially sustainable system of long term care, taking account of the Mercer Report, the views of the consultation that was undertaken on that report and the Eamonn O'Shea review. The issues raised in the Carer's Association's ‘Towards a Family Carers Strategy' were also included in the Group's deliberations.
The report of the working group which is being considered by Government, influenced not only last year's Budget package but also the commitments in "Towards 2016" and now this year's Budget package both in terms of income support for carers and improvements regarding home support packages and other community based services announced by the Minister for Health and Children.
279 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of death benefit pension recipients; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43384/06]
Death benefit is payable under the Occupational Injuries Scheme. If a person dies as a result of an accident at work or an occupational disease their dependants may receive death benefit payments. Their dependants may also get death benefit if the person at the time of their death, had been getting disablement pension assessed at 50% or more regardless of the cause of death. There are no special PRSI contribution conditions attaching to death benefit: it is sufficient that a person was in employment insurable for occupational injuries benefit purposes.
Death benefit includes widow's or widower's pension, orphan's pension and dependent parents' pension.
Widow's or widower's pension, including increases for dependent children, is payable to a person whose spouse dies as a result of an occupational accident. There are currently 636 customers in receipt of this pension under the occupational benefit scheme. Orphan's pension is payable in respect of a child if the parent, step-parent or person who supported the child dies as a result of an occupational accident. A child is regarded as being an orphan if both parents are dead or one parent is dead, and the other parent is unknown, has abandoned or refused or failed to provide for the child. The child's guardian should apply for the pension. There are currently 5 customers in receipt of orphan's pension in respect of 15 children.
Dependent parents' pension is payable where the person who dies leaves a dependent parent or parents. To qualify, the parent must have been wholly or mainly maintained by the deceased. Because of the expansion of other services this payment has not been claimed for many years. There are currently 7 customers in receipt of dependent parents' pension.
280 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the fund and the allocation of such fund for marriage, child and bereavement counselling and other services for the years 2000 to 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43385/06]
My Department, through the Family Support Agency, has responsibility for a number of initiatives to support families and help prevent relationship breakdown.
The Scheme of Grants for Voluntary Organisations providing Marriage, Child and Bereavement Counselling Services is a non-statutory scheme of once-off grants to voluntary organisations providing a range of family counselling services aimed at enhancing stability in family life, and assisting families and their members to deal with difficult periods which they may experience.
In 2006 over €9 million was provided by the Family Support Agency and a total of 541 organisations countrywide received funding under the scheme. During 2006, the Family Support Agency also commissioned a review of the scheme and preliminary findings from the report indicate that up to 70,000 people benefit from the counselling provided. Some €10 million has been allocated to the scheme for 2007.
The amount of funding allocated for the scheme of grants for each of the years 2000 to 2005 was as follows:
|
Year |
Total Funding |
Number of Voluntary Organisations Funded |
|
€million |
||
|
2000 |
4.7 |
397 |
|
2001 |
5.97 |
430 |
|
2002 |
6.659 |
465 |
|
2003 |
7.009 |
460 |
|
2004 |
7.61 |
523 |
|
2005 |
8.258 |
547 |
281 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of people who availed of the bereavement grant; the number who availed of widowed parent grant; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43386/06]
Bereavement Grant is a once off payment designed to assist families in dealing with funeral expenses on the death of an insured person. The recent Budget saw an increase in the payment to EUR 850, with effect from 6 December 2006. It is paid by cheque to the spouse, partner, next of kin or personal representative of the deceased or to the person responsible for the payment of the funeral bill. The scheme covers virtually all insured people, including the self-employed and people covered by the modified rate of social insurance, for example, public servants.
The number of people who availed of bereavement grant in the full year 2005 was 22,302 and in this year to end November was 21,794. The widowed parent grant is designed to assist with the income support needs of widows and widowers with dependent children in the immediate aftermath of a bereavement. It is payable to widows and widowers with dependent children who qualify for a Widow/er's Contributory Pension or a One Parent Family Payment or a Bereavement Grant payable on the death of their spouse. A qualified child for the purpose of the Grant is a child under 18 years or a child between the ages of 18 and 22 years who is in full time education. The rate of the widowed parent grant is EUR 2,700, increasing to EUR 4,000 with effect from 6 December 2006.
The number of people who availed of widowed parent grant in the full year 2005 was 1,131 and this year to end November was 1,126.
283 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the payments which are subject to a Christmas bonus and the way that bonus is applied in each case. [43515/06]
The Christmas Bonus is paid to all recipients of long-term social welfare payments. The payment was made at the beginning of this month, at an estimated €157 million this year and benefited some 1.25 million persons comprising 855,000 recipients and 394,000 dependants.
The focus of the bonus has always been on persons who rely on the social welfare system for financial support over the long term. These include recipients of Blind Pension, Carer's Allowance, Carer's Benefit, Death Benefit by way of pension, Disability Allowance, Disablement Pension, Farm Assist, Guardian's Payment (Contributory and Non-Contributory), Invalidity Pension, Jobseeker's Allowance in respect of a continuous period of unemployment of at least 15 months, One-parent Family Payment, Pre-Retirement Allowance, Deserted Wife's Benefit and Allowance, Prisoner's Wife's Allowance, State Pension (Contributory and Non-Contributory), State Pension (Transition), Widow's and Widower's (Contributory) Pension, and Widow's and Widower's (Non-Contributory) Pension. As Carer's Benefit is now payable for up to 2 years, the bonus was, for the first time this year, paid to recipients of this benefit. The bonus is also payable to recipients of certain income support payments administered by the Ministers for Health and Children, Education and Science, Enterprise, Trade and Employment and Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
284 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will arrange for a full payment to persons on disability benefit similar to the Christmas bonus granted to persons on other social welfare payments. [43538/06]
The Christmas Bonus has again been paid this year to all recipients of long-term social welfare payments, at a rate equivalent to 100% of the person's normal weekly payment, subject to a minimum payment of €30. This measure costs an estimated €157 million this year and benefited some 1.25 million persons comprising 855,000 recipients and 394,000 dependants.
The focus of the bonus has always been on persons who rely on the social welfare system for financial support over the long term. These include recipients of State Pension (Transition), State Pension (Contributory and Non-Contributory), Widow's, Widower's and Invalidity Pensions, One-parent Family Payment, Carer's Allowance, Disability Allowance, long-term Jobseeker's Allowance, Farm Assist and people in receipt of employment support payments.
As Carer's Benefit is now payable for up to 2 years, the bonus was, for the first time this year, paid to recipients of this benefit.
The bonus is also payable to participants in the Rural Social Scheme, which was introduced in 2004, and operates under the aegis of the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
Any extension of entitlement to the bonus payment to short-term schemes would have significant cost implications. In relation to illness benefit, it is open to persons who have been in receipt of illness benefit for at least a year to apply for Invalidity Pension, and, if they qualify for the pension, they would also qualify for the Christmas Bonus payment.
285 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when he will meet with the sufferers of pneumonocosis with a view to addressing their concerns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43605/06]
287 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will review the qualification guidelines for payment of occupational injury with a view to awarding payment to all sufferers of pneumonocosis regardless of the extent to which they are deemed to have contracted the illness; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43607/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 285 and 287 together.
Pneumoconiosis is a prescribed disease for the purpose of the Occupational Injuries scheme administered by my Department. The legislation governing the Occupational Injuries Scheme provides entitlement to benefit for persons suffering from certain prescribed diseases which are listed in the legislation and where that person has contracted that disease in the course of their employment.
Where a person has contracted one of the diseases listed in the legislation, benefits are payable if they were employed in an occupation which is specifically prescribed in relation to that disease. In addition, benefits may be payable if the claimant can show that the disease was contracted through an employment not specifically prescribed in relation to that disease.
Employment under a contract of service as a miner is insurable for Occupational Injuries Benefit under the Social Welfare Acts. Miners who are unable to work due to an accident arising from their employment may be entitled to occupational injury benefit for the first 26 weeks of their claim. If their incapacity extends beyond that period they may receive Disability Benefit or Invalidity Pension, subject to meeting the qualifying conditions for these payments.
Miners may be entitled to Disablement Benefit if they suffer a loss of physical or mental faculty as a result of an accident at work or a disease prescribed in legislation that they contracted at work.
Medical assessments are undertaken in all such cases to determine the degree of disablement, which is calculated by comparison of the state of health of the applicant with a person of the same age and gender.
Persons claiming Occupational Injuries Benefit in cases of Pneumoconiosis are referred to Consultant Respiratory Physicians in the first instance for an examination and report. This examination consists of a clinical assessment and pulmonary function testing (PFT). Disablement benefit is awarded on the basis of the consultant's report, including the pulmonary function test result. The degree of disablement is expressed as a percentage of loss of faculty and the compensation payable varies accordingly.
Loss of faculty may be determined within a range of less than 1% to 100%, depending on the severity of the condition. With regard to the 21 persons currently in receipt of disablement benefit as a result of contracting pneumoconiosis arising from their occupation, the percentage of disablement assessed ranges from 8% to 90%. A person must be assessed as having a minimum of 20% loss of faculty before they may be considered as being incapable of work due to their disablement.
The arrangements which apply to pneumoconiosis under the occupational injuries scheme are in line with practice elsewhere and there are no plans at present to change those arrangements. My officials will be glad to meet with representatives of the group involved to discuss any concerns in relation to the present arrangements.
286 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on offering old age pension payments on a pro-rata basis to persons with an average of less than 10 contributions during their working lives; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43606/06]
In order to qualify for the maximum rate of the state pension (contributory) a person must, amongst other qualifying conditions, achieve a yearly average of at least 48 contributions paid or credited on his/her social insurance record. Reduced pensions are paid to those with yearly averages as low as 10 contributions and arrangements are also in place for the payment of pro-rata pensions to those with mixed rate insurance records or contributions from other EU member States or countries with which Ireland has a reciprocal agreement.
I am anxious to ensure that as many people as possible can qualify for a contributory pension and, in this regard, the range of reduced payments has been expanded over the years so that more people can receive a payment. In relation to the current qualifying conditions I might add that up until 1997 an average of 20 contributions was required for a minimum pension.
However, in considering eligibility for contributory payments it is necessary to uphold the contributory principle which underpins entitlement. This requires, amongst other things, that people meet a minimum contribution threshold in order to qualify. This is a normal feature of pension schemes in other countries. On balance I think the threshold which we have set is a reasonable one and, in the circumstances, I do not consider that it would be appropriate to reduce it further.
288 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the extent to which he will improve the qualification guidelines for rent allowance with particular reference to the sensitivities of some cases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43613/06]
The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. The purpose of the scheme is to provide short-term income support to eligible people living in private rented accommodation whose means are insufficient to meet their accommodation costs and who do not have accommodation available to them from any other source.
In Budget 2007 I introduced a combination of measures which when taken together offer a significant reform of the manner in which rent and mortgage interest supplement entitlement is decided.
From April 2007, the means test for Rent and Mortgage Interest Supplement is being reformed so that recipients retain at least half of any extra income they get from part-time employment, education or training allowances, subject to a limit of €200 in extra income. This means that they may be better off by up to €100 per week as a result of availing of such opportunities.
In addition, from April 2007, any person who is on a local authority waiting list for accommodation under the Rental Accommodation Scheme (those with a long-term housing need), may now return to full-time employment and be considered for a rent supplement payment under the standard means test as outlined above. This new system replaces the existing special retention arrangements.
From January 2007, any additional amount of State pension which is in excess of the supplementary welfare allowance rate will be disregarded when calculating rent or mortgage interest supplement entitlements.
These new measures do not in any way restrict the flexibility available to the Health Service Executive to deal with exceptional cases. In this regard the Executive may provide assistance in the form of a supplement in any case, where, in its opinion, the circumstances of the particular case so warrant.
Overall, I believe that Budget 2007 provides for significant improvements to the rent supplement scheme both in terms of simplifying the current assessment process and in offering clear incentives to those returning to work.
The Community Welfare Service provides a responsive and flexible approach to meeting individuals' needs under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme. Within the service customers are dealt with in a setting that facilitates privacy, sensitivity and confidentiality and supports the access to information. I am confident that this ethos would be followed in all cases by Community Welfare Officers and Superintendent Community Officers in their dealings with applicants for rent supplement
289 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will further improve and ease the qualification guidelines for family income supplement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43614/06]
Family income supplement is designed to provide support for people on low earnings with child dependants and provide the incentive for them to remain in, or take up, employment. Recent improvements to family income supplement include the change of assessment from a gross income basis to net income, the increase to €20 per week in the minimum payment and, in Budget 2007, the continued re-focusing of income thresholds to include additional gains for larger families.
The increased family income supplement weekly thresholds announced in Budget 2007 will benefit families by various amounts, from €9 (for a one child family) to €111 (for a family with eight or more children). This will increase the average payment, per child, to €50 a week. These increases will make an estimated 5,600 additional families eligible for a full FIS payment. The cost of this measure is estimated at €32 million in 2007 and in a full year.
Research has shown that poverty is more likely to be concentrated in larger families. The new FIS thresholds both significantly increase all payments and concentrate additional resources on larger families. This continues the re-focusing of thresholds which started in Budget 2006, to target resources at households in poverty.
In the context of an overall review of targeted child income support payments, the National Economic and Social Council was asked to examine the feasibility of merging the family income supplement with child dependant allowance and possibly including other child supports such as the back to school clothing and footwear allowance, resulting in a single second tier child income support. Such a payment would be aimed specifically at targeting child poverty by channelling resources to low-income families without creating significant disincentives to employment. This commitment to examining such a change was subsequently embodied in the partnership agreement ‘Toward 2016' which committed to completing consideration of the issue within one year.
I have long held the view that implementing such a second tier of payment for children in low income and welfare families is the most effective method of significantly reducing remaining child poverty. Overall, Child Benefit remains the main universal support for families with children.
I now intend introducing in this Bill, a new single high rate Qualified Child Allowance (formerly Child Dependant Allowance) targeted specifically at families on welfare where, naturally, children are most at risk of poverty. The current three Qualified Child Allowance rates will be combined into a single rate of €22 per week to be paid for over 340,000 children of welfare families. For those on the current lower rates of €16.80 and €19.30 per child per week, this represents a substantial improvement, particularly when taken with Child Benefit and other increases.
I view this improved and targeted allowance as representing a substantial move in the direction of a second tier payment and that is why in this Budget I have deliberately taken the decision to focus increased child supports in this area. I intend to build on the advances made on a second tier payment system in Budget 2007 when I receive the NESC report.
292 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the extent to which carers can or will receive credited contributions for the time they have spent caring; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43618/06]
Credited contributions, or ‘credits' as they are termed, are intended to protect the entitlements, particularly the pension rights, of employees and other persons participating in the social insurance system when they are ill or unemployed. A person who is providing full time care and attention to a person as a carer is awarded credits on the same basis as if they were out of the workforce due to illness or unemployment. Under the current statutory provisions governing the award of credited contributions, recipients of the carer's allowance may be awarded credits if they switched to that payment from another credit-bearing payment such as jobseeker's allowance. From April 1999, formal provision was made for the award of credits to claimants of carer's allowance who have left insurable employment to engage in caring duties.
Recipients of carer's allowance, who are not entitled to credits, may be eligible for home-makers disregards which preserve the carer's entitlement for contributory pension purposes. The home-maker scheme provides that contribution years spent working in the home while caring on a full-time basis for a child up to 12 years of age or an incapacitated person will be disregarded in calculating a person's yearly average number of contributions for old age contributory pension purposes. The provisions apply from the contribution year commencing on 6 April 1994 and up to 20 contribution years may be disregarded. The award of credits is subject to certain conditions. For example, when a person has no paid or credited contributions for a period of two years, they cannot be awarded further credits until 26 contributions are paid. In recognition of their caring role, this rule will be waived where claimants of carer's allowance were eligible for home-makers disregards immediately prior to claiming carer's allowance. This, in effect, means that credits will be awarded where a person who has a gap of two years in their paid or credited contributions was eligible for home-makers disregards before claiming carer's allowance. This will protect the position of people who did not give up work to become carers but may have qualified for home-makers disregards due to child-minding duties and who subsequently became carers after a two year period had expired. All aspects of the carer's allowance scheme and supports for carers are kept under review and ways of increasing and expanding services for carers will continue to be examined.
293 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will increase or expand the free fuel allowance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43619/06]
In Budget 2007, I have provided for a number of improvements in the fuel allowance scheme. These comprise an increase in the weekly rate of fuel allowance of €4 from €14 to €18 (€21.90 in designated smokeless areas) — a doubling in two years — and an increase in the income threshold for eligibility to fuel allowance by €49 from €51 to €100 above the state pension (contributory) rate. These changes add to a range of improvements made to the scheme in recent years including an easing of the means test, extending the duration of payment from 26 to 29 weeks and an increase of €5 in the rate of payment in the 2006 Budget. Some 274,000 people will benefit in 2006 at an estimated annual cost €125.1m. As a consequence of the increase in rate announced in the recent Budget, annual expenditure on the scheme in 2007 will increase by €31.8m to €156.9m.
294 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the most common reason for delays in processing social welfare claims through jurisdictions with which Ireland has a bilateral arrangement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43620/06]
Ireland currently has bilateral social security agreements with seven countries: Austria, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the USA and Switzerland. Ireland also entered into a bilateral understanding with Quebec on 1 October 1994. The main purpose of these agreements is to protect the social security pension rights of workers who have worked both in Ireland and the other country to which the agreements apply. Ireland also processes claims under EU legislation from workers in the EU states. The bilateral arrangements with Austria, Switzerland and the United Kingdom have limited application as EU Regulations apply in most cases.
Social welfare entitlements that fall to be examined under EU or Bilateral agreements take a longer time to process than domestic claims due to the need to obtain and exchange information with the other countries involved. Reviews of the implementation of EU and Bilateral arrangements are carried out from time to time by officials of the Department and institutions in the other countries are requested to expedite the transfer of information as quickly as possible. The logistics involved in transferring information between institutions in different countries inevitably leads to delays outside the control of my Department. There is currently a build-up in this Department of claims for processing under EU and Bilateral arrangements arising from the substantial increase in claims from EU nationals in recent years. In the majority of cases the persons involved are already in receipt of a pension from another Member State or country with which the Department has a bilateral agreement. My Department is endeavouring to process these claims as quickly as possible through the use of overtime and the deployment of additional staff from other areas. In addition, the use of temporary staff to assist in the processing of claims is being considered. Delays in processing claim applications do not result in any losses to pensioners and those who qualify for payment have their claims backdated fully in accordance with the normal provisions for backdating of claims.
295 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he will improve the eligibility guidelines for qualification of free schemes with particular reference to widows with dependent children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43621/06]
The household benefits package, which comprises the electricity/gas allowance, telephone allowance and television licence schemes, is generally available to people living permanently in the State, aged 66 years or over, who are in receipt of a social welfare type payment or who satisfy a means test. The package is also available to carers and people with disabilities under the age of 66 who are in receipt of certain welfare type payments. Widows and widowers aged 60 to 65 whose late spouses had been in receipt of the household benefits package retain that entitlement to ensure that households do not suffer a loss of entitlements following the death of a spouse.
People aged over 70 years of age can qualify for the household benefits package regardless of their income or household composition. Those aged under 70 must live alone or only with certain excepted people in order to qualify. Excepted people for the purposes of the scheme include qualified adults, dependent children under age 18 or under age 22 if in full time education, people who are so incapacitated as to require constant care and attention for at least 12 months; people who would qualify for the allowance in their own right, people who are providing constant care and attention to any member of the household who is so incapacitated as to require constant care and attention for at least 12 months. A range of proposals, have been made to extend the coverage of the household benefits package of free schemes. These proposals are kept under review in the context of the objectives of the scheme and budgetary resources.
296 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if he proposes to ease the qualification guidelines for the back to education allowance with particular reference to the required period of unemployment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43622/06]
The back to education allowance is a second chance education opportunities scheme designed to encourage and facilitate people on certain social welfare payments to improve their skills and qualifications and, therefore, their prospects of returning to the active work force. The qualifying period for access to the second level option of the scheme is six months. As the Deputy is aware, I reduced the qualifying period for access to the third level option of the scheme to 12 months in the 2005 Budget. I also increased the annual cost of education allowance, paid to people on BTEA, from €254 to €400. These changes came into effect from 1 September 2005. Following an undertaking to the Dáil and the Social Affairs Committee, I further reduced the qualifying period for access to the third level option to 9 months. This condition applies to persons who are participating in the National Employment Action Plan (NEAP) process and where a FÁS Employment Services Officer recommends pursuance of a third level course of study as essential to the enhancement of the individual's employment prospects. This new condition also came into effect from 1 September 2005. In the 2006 Budget, I announced that time spent in receipt of supplementary welfare allowance from the Health Services Executive or the direct provision system operated by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform can count towards the qualifying period for back to education allowance in circumstances where the person establishes an entitlement to a relevant social welfare payment prior to commencing an approved course of study. This provision came into effect from September 2006. In Budget 2007 I extended the entitlement to participate in the back to education scheme to persons losing their employment with an entitlement to statutory redundancy, provided they have an underlying entitlement to a relevant social welfare payment. There will be no need to satisfy the qualifying period normally required. This enhancement to the scheme recognises their need to retrain at the earliest possible time, in order to re-access the changing labour market. This will be effective from September 2007. I will continue to monitor the scheme but I believe that, overall, the current arrangements ensure that the scheme continues to provide valuable assistance to people who have been out of the workforce for some time and enhances the opportunities of obtaining employment.
297 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be approved and awarded the respite care grant for 2006. [43665/06]
The person to whom the Deputy refers submitted an application for Respite Care Grant which was received in the Department on 4 October 2006. A decision to award the Respite Care Grant for 2006 was made by a Deciding Officer on 27 October 2006. The Respite Care Grant was not awarded in respect of 2005, on the grounds that the person concerned was not so incapacitated as to require full-time care and attention at that time. The application submitted made it clear that care recipient's medical condition had deteriorated between 2005 and 2006. An error was made in communicating the decision. The person concerned was told that he had been awarded the Respite Care Grant for 2005 and accordingly a cheque for €1,000, the amount of the grant for 2005, was issued to him. This mistake has now been rectified and the balance of the payment, €200, is being issued to him along with an appeal form in respect of the 2005 grant. The miscommunication is regretted.
298 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Transport if his Department has investigated the cost to the economy of traffic congestion in the greater Dublin area; if so, the outcome of such investigations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43627/06]
I am very conscious of the adverse impacts of traffic congestion on the economy and on the national well-being. The need to tackle congestion is one of the key aims of Transport 21. Transport 21 provides funding for measures to relieve congestion in the Greater Dublin Area in a number of ways — through the provision of increased public transport services, through investment in improved traffic management systems and the improvement of the road network. Transport 21 will transform the public transport system in the Greater Dublin Area through the development of an integrated network of light rail, Metro, heavy rail and buses running on an expanded Quality Bus Network. This will lead to almost a doubling of public transport passenger journeys by 2015. This, together with the upgrading of the M50 and new traffic management systems will make a major contribution to reducing congestion in the capital. The establishment of a Dublin Transport Authority will provide a coordinated approach to the issue of traffic management and will, therefore, result in improvements to traffic flow.
299 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Transport when the additional 100 buses for Dublin Bus will be in service on bus routes. [43488/06]
I am informed by Dublin Bus that as of 8 December 2006 it had taken delivery of 80 of the 100 additional buses for which I announced funding 28 September 2006. The remainder are due to be delivered by the end of January 2007. I also understand from Dublin Bus that these buses will begin to be introduced into service in the coming weeks and that they will be phased in over a period of six months following commissioning trials.
300 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Transport when work will begin on footbridges over the railway line at Coolmine and Clonsilla stations; and when these bridges will be completed. [43539/06]
The provision and maintenance of footbridges over railway lines is a matter for Iarnród Éireann and not one in which I have any role. I understand however from Iarnród Éireann that tenders for the construction of the new footbridges at Coolmine and Clonsilla stations are due to be received by 18 December 2006 and the project programme provides for the bridges to be completed and in use by June 2007.
301 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Transport when additional services will be added to the Maynooth line. [43540/06]
I understand from Iarnród Eireann that the Company plans to introduce additional services on the Maynooth line next year when the Docklands Station opens. The scheduling and timetabling of trains is however, a day-to-day operational matter for Iarnród Éireann.
302 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for Transport when the review of bus routes that Dublin Bus are currently undertaking will be completed; if public consultation will be permitted on the outcome of this review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43541/06]
The Bus Network Review was completed for Dublin Bus by MVA Consultants in February, 2006. I understand from Dublin Bus that consultation took place prior to its publication with representative groups across Dublin as well as with key stakeholders.
The Review is available on the Dublin Bus website www.dublinbus.ie
303 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport if he will seek an explanation from Bus Éireann as to the reason for their failure to respond to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 428 and 430 of 3 October 2006; the reporting arrangements that exist between his Department and the CIE companies in relation to the collation of such information; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43566/06]
My Department wrote to Bus Éireann on 6th October forwarding a copy of the reply to the Dáil Question of 3rd October and requesting that the company forward directly to the Deputy the information being sought. A reminder was issued to the company on the 2nd November. I understand that Bus Éireann have now provided to the Deputy the information sought.
304 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Transport if the increase in tolls due to be imposed by NTR at the Westlink toll plaza will increase the cost of the buy out; if so, the amount by which it will increase; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43628/06]
I should explain that the statutory power to levy tolls on national roads, to make toll bye-laws and to enter into toll agreements with private investors in respect of national roads is vested in the NRA under Part V of the Roads Act 1993 (as amended by the Planning and Development Act 2000).
The negotiations between the NRA and NTR on the ending of the latter's involvement with the Westlink facility are not concluded and I do not propose to comment on that matter at this juncture.
305 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the reason for the continuing delay in reintroducing height limits for HGVs as promised; and when he proposes to do so. [43638/06]
I propose to make an announcement on this matter shortly.
306 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport if he has received the proposals from the Integrated Ticketing Project Board in relation to scope, timelines and a budget for the phased completion of the integrated ticketing project; the way he will proceed with details of the timescale; and the cost envisaged. [43640/06]
I await proposals from the Integrated Ticketing Project Board in relation to scope, timeliness and a budget for the phased completion of the integrated ticketing project. I expect these details to be included in the Board's report up to end November 2006, which I expect to receive in the coming days.
307 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport if an EU standard for the retro-fitting of passenger side blind-spot mirrors has been agreed by the EU and is available to his Department; and if so his views on introducing legislation or regulations for the compulsory retro-fitting of these mirrors to HGVs and large vehicles prior to any further EU decision in relation to the blind spot in front of such vehicles. [43641/06]
In October 2006, the European Commission published a proposal for a directive to require existing HGVs to be retrofitted with enhanced mirrors on their passenger side to improve the lateral field of indirect vision of drivers. Earlier this week the proposal was considered by EU Transport Ministers at a meeting of the Transport Council and agreement was reached on the general approach to the draft directive. Essentially, the approach involves requiring HGVs registered since 1 January 2000 to be retrofitted with the enhanced mirrors within three years of the directive coming into force. Also at the Council, in response to requests from a number of Member States, including Ireland, to include in the proposals measures to address the blind spot to the front of existing HGVs, the Transport Commissioner indicated that the Commission would undertake a study of this particular matter.
The proposals cannot be adopted as a directive until such time as they have been considered by the European Parliament and agreed by the Transport Council. I will await the outcome of the consideration of the proposals by the European institutions before legislating in relation to the retrofitting of mirrors to existing HGVs.
308 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Transport when he will announce funding allocations to the regional airports; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43667/06]
I refer the Deputy to Question No. 133 of Wednesday, 6th December 2006 and I confirm that the position remains unchanged.
309 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Transport if he has discussed the proposed sale of international assets by the State airport authority; the proposals in relation to the latter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43668/06]
Matters relating to the assets of the Dublin Airport Authority fall within the statutory responsibilities of the board of the Authority. I am kept informed of all major issues in this regard.
310 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if he will consider funding through the dormant accounts for a group (details supplied) in County Mayo; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43391/06]
Among the priority measures approved by Government for assistance from dormant accounts in 2006 is one providing small-scale equipment grants for youth groups. Applications received for this funding measure, including one received from the organisation in question, are currently being processed and assessed by the relevant Vocational Education Committees under the auspices of the Department of Education and Science. It is anticipated that recommendations will be submitted to Government for decision early next year, in accordance with the legislation.
311 Mr. J. Breen asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if, in view of his stated commitment to the development of rural Ireland, and in an effort to facilitate the creation of further employment to boost the rural economy, he will reverse the decision to discontinue the community broadband scheme, especially in view of the fact that the Mid West Regional Authority has already made provision in Estimates 2007 for the anticipated funding for community broadband connection; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43532/06]
In 2003 and 2004, 15 projects covering 17 locations in CLÁR areas, received broadband supply (DSL, wireless, satellite, etc) under two specific measures operating under the CLÁR Programme.
Having consulted with the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, however, I do not propose any further investment in broadband in CLÁR areas. My Department have been advised that the County and Group Broadband Schemes, run by that Department, can amply accommodate broadband supply to rural areas.
312 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs his response to a letter (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43543/06]
While I have publicly responded to the issues raised in recent days, I am unable to say anything of substance on the record of the House in reply to the Question given that the Question is presented on a details supplied basis.
313 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive their disadvantaged area payment. [43330/06]
The person named submitted an application for Single Farm Payment/ Disadvantaged Areas Scheme on 21 April 2006. The application has been fully processed and payment will issue shortly.
314 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when a person (details supplied) in County Wexford will receive their area aid; if same will be awarded as soon as possible; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43368/06]
The position is that an application for the Transfer of Entitlements under the Single Payment Scheme from the person named was submitted on the 10th May 2006. During processing of the Transfer application, it was necessary for an official of my Department to write to the person named to seek clarification on certain matters relating to the application. Upon receipt of this information, my Department will process the application and will correspond directly with the person named.
315 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the reason a person (details supplied) in County Mayo has not received their single payment scheme for 2006; the reason for the delay in this case; when this will be resolved; and the payment that will issue to this person. [43369/06]
The person named applied to transfer in entitlements by lease under the Private Contract Clause measure of the Single Payment Scheme. These entitlements had to revert to the lessor before the applicant's 2006 Trading application could be processed. This has now taken place and payment in the order of €9,453.38 will issue to the person named shortly.
316 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will ensure that farmers have a clear and unimpeded view for the scales in meat plants; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43399/06]
Officials of my Department carry out regular inspections of meat plants to ensure that weighing equipment is checked and that weighing procedures are being correctly carried out in a consistent manner. In some meat plants, farmers have a clear view of the scales readout where the plant has installed a special viewing area specifically for this purpose. In some cases it might not be practical for the meat plant to install a viewing area because of plant design. In such cases it would be a matter for the plant to decide, taking account of hygiene and health and safety concerns, whether a farmer would be permitted access to the scales area during processing of his or her animals.
317 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the annual cost of the afforestation grants for conifers and broadleaves grant scheme, on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; if she will quantify the activity generated by the scheme for each year for which figures are supplied; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year under the scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43411/06]
The current scheme was introduced as part of the Rural Development Programme 2000-2006. The details requested by the Deputy are shown in the following table. Activity is presented in terms of hectares planted.
|
Year |
Grant |
Hectares |
Highest Payment |
Lowest Payment |
Average Payment |
|
€m |
|||||
|
2000 |
33.7 |
15,696 |
270,600.67 |
12.69 |
22,627.24 |
|
2001 |
35.6 |
15,463 |
222,861.89 |
387.59 |
24,602.97 |
|
2002 |
35.9 |
15,054 |
154,654.33 |
539.63 |
23,619.19 |
|
2003 |
23.5 |
9,097 |
117,777.00 |
838.03 |
22,833.62 |
|
2004 |
25.2 |
9,739 |
241,207.70 |
482.50 |
22,158.21 |
|
2005 |
26.9 |
10,096 |
158,172.16 |
586.00 |
21,899.75 |
An amount of approximately €31m will be provided for the payment of first Grants for afforestation in 2007.
318 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the annual cost of the farm waste management grant scheme, on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; if she will quantify the activity generated by the scheme for each year for which figures are supplied; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year under the scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43412/06]
The Scheme of Investment Aid in Farm Waste Management provided for in the National Development Plan 2000-2006 was introduced on 1 February 2001. This Scheme is a sub-Measure under the Regional Operational Programmes for the Border, Midlands and Western Region and the Southern and Eastern Region. A revised scheme was introduced at the end of March this year.
The following is the information requested by the Deputy:
|
Year |
Expenditure |
No. of Applications |
Smallest Payment |
Average Payment |
Largest Payment |
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
||
|
2001 |
153,000 |
2,454 |
600 |
3,000 |
7,000 |
|
2002 |
9,399,000 |
2,997 |
600 |
7,500 |
20,000 |
|
2003 |
20,607,000 |
1,515 |
400 |
10,000 |
28,000 |
|
2004 |
16,655,000 |
3,074 |
500 |
10,000 |
41,250 |
|
2005 |
19,097,000 |
3,075 |
500 |
10,000 |
41,250 |
|
2006 (to end Sept) |
15,743,000 |
9,760 |
500 |
10,000 |
41,250 |
The financial allocation for the Farm Waste Management Scheme in 2007 will be indicated in the Revised Book of Estimates to be published in February 2008. The Scheme will close for new applications at the end of 2006.
319 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the annual cost of the rural environment protection scheme, on an annual basis from the date the scheme started; if she will quantify the activity generated by the scheme for each year for which figures are supplied; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year under the scheme; the projected cost of the scheme in 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43413/06]
The information requested is as follows:
|
Year |
Cost |
Participants |
|
€million |
||
|
1994 |
1.5 |
336 |
|
1995 |
37.4 |
8,415 |
|
1996 |
70.9 |
18,194 |
|
1997 |
127.6 |
29,132 |
|
1998 |
167.9 |
36,300 |
|
1999 |
183.2 |
41,092 |
|
2000 |
205.6 |
44,802 |
|
2001 |
164.8 |
34,293 |
|
2002 |
172.6 |
43,643 |
|
2003 |
183.9 |
38,493 |
|
2004 |
208.9 |
42,697 |
|
2005 |
284.6 |
47,483 |
|
2006 (Projected out-turn) |
323 |
58,500 |
The size of the average farm in REPS is 34 hectares. Since the scheme was introduced in 1994, a farm of that size would have qualified for €5,406 per annum under REPS 1 (1994-99), for €5,134 per annum under REPS 2 (2000-04), and for €6,450 per annum under REPS 3 (2004-06). Some €328 million has been provided for REPS in the 2007 Estimates.
320 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will immediately pay all moneys due to a person (details supplied) in County Kerry. [43452/06]
An application for the Transfer of Entitlements to the person named under the Single Payment Scheme was submitted on 20 March 2006. The application was examined and further documentation was required. An official from my Department contacted the person named and requested the outstanding documentation. The requested documentation has since been received and the application has now been fully processed. Payment in respect of 20.27 entitlements transferred by way of lease will issue shortly. A separate application for the Transfer of Entitlements to the person named under the 2006 Single Payment Scheme was submitted on the 22nd of March 2006. However, the entitlements in question had already been transferred to the person named under the private contract clause for a period of nine years from 2005 under the 2005 Single Payment Scheme. The person concerned has been informed accordingly.
321 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will reinstate payment under the early retirement scheme to a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny in view of the circumstances of their case. [43453/06]
It is a requirement of the EU Council Regulation under which the 1994 Early Retirement Scheme was introduced that the Early Retirement Pension can be paid only as a supplement to any national retirement pension to which the participant, and his or her spouse or partner in a joint management arrangement, is entitled. This means the entire value of any such national retirement pension payable must be deducted from the Early Retirement Pension. The person named was reminded by my Department in July 2006 of the requirement to apply for a national retirement pension. Where details of a participant's entitlement or otherwise to a national retirement pension are not submitted to my Department, it is necessary to avoid overpayment to suspend payment of the Early Retirement pension until such time as they are received. In this case, the person named reached the age of 66 in November 2006. Accordingly the Early Retirement Pension has been suspended pending the receipt of details of the outcome of her application for a national retirement pension.
322 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when entitlements under the single farm payment scheme will issue to persons (details supplied) in County Tipperary. [43461/06]
The position is that an application for the Transfer of Entitlements under the Single Payment Scheme to the persons named was submitted on the 10th May 2006. During processing of the Transfer application it was necessary for an official from my Department to make contact with a third party in relation to the transfer and request further documentation. Upon receipt of this documentation, my Department will process the application and will correspond directly with the persons named. A separate application was also submitted to transfer entitlements under the 2006 Single Payment Scheme to the persons named on the 11th May 2006. During processing of the Transfer application, it was necessary for an official of my Department to make direct contact with the persons named and request outstanding documentation. Upon receipt of this documentation, my Department will process the application and will correspond directly with the persons named. A further application was also submitted to transfer entitlements under the 2006 Single Payment Scheme to the persons named on the 2nd October 2006. This application was accepted even though the closing date for receipt of completed applications to transfer entitlements was the 16th May 2006. This application has now been fully processed and payment in respect of 46.10 national reserve entitlements transferred by way of gift will issue shortly. The person named was paid €1,369.45 in respect of Disadvantaged Areas Scheme 2006 on 22 September 2006.
323 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if an application for a tree felling licence has been made in respect of a building development (details supplied) in County Tipperary; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43496/06]
324 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she has received a report from the National Parks and Wildlife Services on the conservation implications of a proposed tree felling operation (details supplied) in County Tipperary; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43497/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 323 and 324 together.
The Forest Service of my Department has received an application for a limited felling licence to facilitate the building development referred to by the Deputy. The application is currently being processed in consultation with South Tipperary County Council and the National Parks and Wildlife Service. No report has been received from the National Parks and Wildlife Service on the proposals to date.
325 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the way she proposes to deal with what is now perceived to be incorrect advice given by Teagasc advisers when advising dairy farmers in respect of the storage of soiled water from milking parlours (details supplied); the person with whom the responsibility for this error lies; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43516/06]
I am satisfied that my Department has correctly interpreted the requirements of the Good Agricultural Practice Regulations (SI No. 378 of 2006) with regard to slurry and soiled water.
The requirement for soiled water storage is clearly set out in the Good Agricultural Practice Regulations (S.I. No. 378 of 2006). Article 8 requires that facilities for soiled water storage shall equal or exceed the capacity required to store all soiled water likely to arise on the holding during a period of 10 days. The Regulations also contain a very precise definition of soiled water.
The reference to 16 weeks relates to the storage of livestock manures. The requirements in relation to storage of livestock manure are 16, 18, 20 or 22 weeks, depending on the Zone in which the holding is located.
This is a farm management issue and it is up to each individual farmer to decide, in consultation with his or her adviser if they wish, how best to meet the requirements of the Regulations regarding the storage and management of soiled water and livestock manures on his or her holding.
326 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the level of backlog that exists in the processing of the transfer of entitlements from one herd number to another, in particular where a father and son would have combined their farm in a farm partnership; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43517/06]
The position is that the introduction of the Single Payment Scheme in 2005 brought the new concept of Payment Entitlements into the direct payments system. Payment entitlements are not attached to land but are the property of the farmer who was farming during the reference period and was in receipt of direct payments under one or more of the Livestock Premium and/or Arable Aid schemes.
Entitlements may now be sold with or without land but can only be sold without land once 80% have been used in one calendar year. On the other hand entitlements may only be leased to another farmer if accompanied by an equivalent number of hectares of eligible land. Entitlements may also of course be transferred, with or without land, by gift or through inheritance. The registration details of entitlements may also be changed (for example from one name to joint names).
It is incumbent on my Department to maintain a database of entitlements which contains the name and herd number under which entitlements are registered with a view to ensuring that payment issues to the correct holder(s) of the entitlements in any particular year. When entitlements are transferred from one farmer to another or when the registration details of the herd number are changed, the parties must complete an application to have the registration details of the entitlements changed. The application forms to be completed by farmers engaged in transferring or changing the registration details of entitlements are available on my Department's website. In this context, where the registration details of an entire holding are being changed (for example from one name to joint names) within the 10 months period for compliance with the Single Payment Scheme requirements, the parties must complete a separate declaration of undertaking under which the persons being newly registered undertake to succeed to the responsibilities of the original applicant and thereby become entitled to payment.
The closing date for receipt of applications to transfer entitlements for 2006 was 16 May 2006 while application to change the registration details within the 10 months period may be accepted at any time during that period. Some 5614 applications have been received in my Department to transfer entitlements for the 2006 Single Payment Scheme. Some 1460 of these applications were received after the closing date — many have only been received in recent months. Since 2006 was the first year that these new arrangements were in place it is understandable that many farmers were unfamiliar with the requirements relating to registration of entitlements. My Department is making every effort to have all of these applications processed as quickly as possible. Applications for the sale of entitlements with land or the lease of entitlements must be accompanied by appropriate documentation (copy deed of transfer/lease agreement etc). In over 50% of cases the required documentation was not furnished with the original applications necessitating further contact with the parties involved.
327 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the reason the single farm payment due to a person (details supplied) in County Carlow is being held up; and if she will ensure that they receive payment before Christmas 2006. [43542/06]
The 2006 Single Payment application for the person named has been fully processed and payment will issue shortly.
328 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when payment of the EU single payment will issue to a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [43548/06]
An application under the 2006 Single Payment Scheme was received from the person named on 5 May 2006. An initial payment issued to the person named on 11 December 2006 and it is expected that the balancing payment will issue to the person named in the coming week.
329 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she has had any communication from the EU Agriculture Commission regarding payment of compensation to former Greencore workers; if it is a condition of the compensation payments to Greencore that unless there was a social plan attached to the business plan from the company, which not only deals with proper compensation for workers but also takes into account decisions of the Labour Court, the Commission would not make the compensation payments to Greencore; if this regulation would also apply to growers, transporters and so on; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43570/06]
The EU restructuring aid for the sugar industry, as provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No. 320/2006, is to cover the economic, social and environmental costs of restructuring, involving factory closure and renunciation of quota. The aid is to be drawn down on the basis of an aid application, including a detailed restructuring plan, submitted by the sugar processor. In July 2006 the Government made decisions regarding the percentage of the aid to be reserved for beet growers and contractors and the indicative breakdown of the potential allocation of the aid to be followed by Greencore in preparing its restructuring plan. These decisions are now the subject of judicial review proceedings instituted by Greencore in the High Court and, in the circumstances, it would not be appropriate for me to make any comment.
Subject to the outcome of the Judicial Review, the application and restructuring plan which includes a social plan dealing inter alia with redundancy payments, has been submitted to the EU Commission in accordance with the requirements of the Regulation.
I understand that the Commission has not taken a view on compensation for former Greencore workers other than to reiterate the requirements of the Regulation in regard to the restructuring plan.
The position remains that there is a dispute between the workers and Greencore over the interpretation of the Labour Court recommendation and resolution of that dispute is a matter in which I have no function. My colleague Mr. Tony Killeen TD, Minister for Labour Affairs, outlined the position regarding the Labour Court recommendation in this House on 25 October 2006 and said that the Court remains available to the parties to advance a resolution to the dispute.
330 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the reason a single farm payment in which all documentation has now been finalised, and which the applicant was assured would be paid on the week of 4 December 2006, has not been paid to this person (details supplied) in County Westmeath; the steps which will now be taken to ensure that the Cavan office of her Department is notified that same can now be paid; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43571/06]
The person named submitted an application for Single Payment Scheme/ Disadvantaged Areas Scheme on 4 May 2006. Following processing of the application issues arose regarding the registration of the herd, which had been amended to include the spouse's name and this has caused the delay in making payment. An official from my Department has been in direct contact with the person named so that an early resolution can be found to this case.
331 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the progress to date on the appeal by a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny for an allocation of payment entitlements from the 2005 single payment scheme national reserve. [43580/06]
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the 2005 Single Payment Scheme National Reserve under Category C.
Category C caters for farmers who sold their milk quota into the Milk Quota Restructuring Scheme and converted their enterprise to a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia and/or Arable Aid Schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000 to 2002.
The person named did not convert to a farming sector for which a direct payment under the Livestock and/or Arable Aid Schemes would have been payable in respect of the years 2000 to 2002 and therefore did not satisfy the criteria for an allocation of entitlements under Category C.
The person named submitted an appeal against this decision. This appeal was forwarded to the Independent Single Payments Appeals Committee who have completed their review and disallowed the Appeal. A letter outlining the decision of the Committee has issued to the person named.
332 Mr. Noonan asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when will the single premium payment for 2006 be granted to a person (details supplied) in County Limerick. [43582/06]
The position is that an application for the Transfer of Entitlements under the Single Payment Scheme from the person named was submitted on the 13th April 2006.
This application has now been fully processed and payment in respect of 3.4 entitlements transferred by way of gift will issue shortly.
333 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive their suckler cow premium scheme payment for 2001, their slaughter premium for 2002 and their special beef premium scheme payment for 2003. [43634/06]
The records of the animals from the herd number of the person named submitted under the 2001 Suckler Cow Premium Scheme, the 2002 Slaughter Premium Scheme and the 2003 Special Beef Premium Scheme, are being examined with a view to identifying those that may be eligible for payment. Eligibility under these Schemes required, inter alia, that the animals concerned comply with the relevant identification and registration requirements. The person named will be notified in due course, as to what payment, if any, will be due in respect of the Schemes in question.
334 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if, further to correspondence (details supplied), she will furnish a response; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43682/06]
The person named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the 2005 Single Payment Scheme National Reserve under Category B and D.
Category B caters for farmers who made an investment in production capacity in a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia and/or Arable Aid schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000-2002. Investments can include purchase or long term lease of land, purchase of suckler and/or ewe quota or other investments.
The person named applied under Category B(i) in relation to investment in land, B(ii) in relation to the purchase of suckler quota and B(iv) in relation to other investments. The person named has been deemed successful under B(i) and B(iv) but not under B(ii) as he did not purchase suckler quota during the relevant period.
Category D caters for farmers who inherited or purchased land and who commenced farming after 31 December, 2002 or who commenced farming in 2002 but who received no direct payments in respect of that scheme year. The person named has been deemed unsuccessful under this category as he is a joint herd owner and the other party to the herd number had received direct payments during the reference years.
A formal letter outlining my Department's decision on the National Reserve has issued to the person named and payment will issue shortly. In addition a response to the correspondence referred to has issued to the Deputy.
335 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of school places available in primary and secondary schools in Lucan and Clondalkin, County Dublin; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43333/06]
I have arranged for the information requested to be collated and forwarded directly to the Deputy.
336 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Education and Science, further to Parliamentary Question No. 537 of 21 November 2006, the position regarding this report; and when the family will hear from her. [43334/06]
My Department has requested additional information from Bus Éireann and will advise the parents of the position regarding transport when this information is received and reviewed.
337 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will arrange to have an application for a higher education grant for a person (details supplied) in County Cork reconsidered. [43392/06]
The decision on eligibility for third level and further education grants is a matter for the relevant Local Authority or VEC. These bodies do not refer individual applications to my Department except, in exceptional cases, where for example, advice or instruction regarding a particular clause in the relevant scheme is desired.
Under the prescribed terms and conditions of my Department's student maintenance grant schemes, grant assistance may not generally be awarded in respect of a repeat period of study at the same level, irrespective of whether or not funding was previously awarded. However, the awarding body may waive this provision in exceptional circumstances such as cases of certified serious illness. It should be emphasised, however, that this discretion would generally only be exercised where a candidate is repeating a period of study on the same course.
My Department understands from officials at Fingal County Council, the body responsible for the assessment of the candidate referred to by the Deputy, that she previously attended year one of a degree course in 2001/2002 at UCC. She is currently pursuing year one of her current degree course and therefore is ineligible for funding under the terms and conditions of my Department's 2006 HEG Scheme.
The candidate will be eligible to be assessed again for maintenance grant when she progresses to the second year of the degree course.
338 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Education and Science if a school (details supplied) in County Meath, which was capped by her officials in the 2003 to 2004 school year at 16 teachers and 464 pupils, will during the 2006 to 2007 school year be upgraded to a 24 teacher senior school in view of the fact that the upgrade will be on the 2.4 acre site presently occupied by the school; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43393/06]
Prior to 2005/06 the school to which the Deputy refers was the only primary school in the area. At that time the school was a fully vertical co-educational facility meaning it catered for pupils from Junior Infants to 6th class. It became a co-educational senior school in September 2005 following the establishment of a corresponding junior co-educational facility. No cap was ever placed by the Department on the school's enrolments.
As the Deputy will be aware, the area in which the school is located is rapidly developing. The Department has determined that to meet the long term need for pupil places, 2 x twenty four classroom schools are required. This provision will be made by way of a new greenfield school site for the junior school and an extension to the existing school. How the extension project can be achieved is a professional matter for the Project Manager who has been appointed by the Department to master plan the sites in question.
339 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress made in moving forward projects identified in the M4 and N4 School Accommodation Report; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43394/06]
As the Deputy will be aware, the local area development plan for the N4/M4 corridor is the framework document for the Department's long-term educational strategy at both primary and post-primary level for the area concerned. The recommendations in the plan are being actioned in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme subject to the published prioritisation criteria for large scale building projects.
340 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 511 of 14 November 2006, if the Office of Public Works negotiations have been completed; if she will proceed with the project; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43401/06]
The Property Management Section of the Office of Public Works (OPW) which acts on behalf of my Department in site acquisitions generally, has been requested to source a suitable site for the school in question.
At this stage the OPW have identified what they consider to be the most suitable site and my Department has conveyed its approval for its acquisition. The site comprises two lots of land. Negotiations for the acquisition of the site are now complete and the OPW have issued letters of offer and are awaiting draft contracts.
On completion of the site acquisition the project can be considered further in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme.
341 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 478 of 7 November 2006, if her Department has received a response to the queries raised with the school; the status of the project; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43402/06]
A response has been received to the queries raised and this is currently being examined by the technical staff of my Department's Planning and Building Unit. The project will proceed to tender once the stage 4/5 submission (detail design/bill of quantities) has been approved.
342 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Education and Science the steps she is taking to ensure that a school (details supplied) in Dublin 13 is retained for community and educational purposes after the school’s proposed closure in June 2007. [43436/06]
When the school to which the Deputy refers closes in June 2007, ownership of the school property, which is currently vested in the trustees, will revert to the Department. In the period leading up to the closure, the Department will consider all available options with regard to its future use.
343 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will explain her reply to Parliamentary Question No. 169 of 7 December 2006. [43437/06]
The reason that data are not yet available on the numbers leaving primary schools in June 2006 is that data were collected from primary schools in the weeks following the Census reference date of 29th September 2006 and preliminary results will not be ready for some time. Similarly, Census forms at second-level are still being processed and preliminary results of students enrolled in first year are not yet available.
344 Mr. Walsh asked the Minister for Education and Science her plans to commence work on the provision of a gaelscoil in Clonakilty, County Cork; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43454/06]
A suitable site has been acquired by the Office of Public Works on behalf of my Department for this project. The long term projected staffing, on which the accommodation needs will be based, has been determined and also notified to the school authority. The building project required to deliver the new school will be progressed in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006-2010.
345 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will make a statement regarding a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if she will ensure that the person will not see their grant aid reduced as per current proposal, in view of the fact that they are receiving payment under the old system. [43455/06]
The Indemnity Agreement concluded between the State and religious congregations in June 2002 provides for a fund of €12.7 million to be used by the State for educational programmes for former residents of institutions and their families.
Pending the establishment of this fund on a statutory basis, my Department introduced an ad-hoc grants scheme for former residents and their families, which was administered by the National Office for Victims of Abuse (NOVA) between 2003 and 2006.
The Education Finance Board is a new statutory body which was set up under the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (Amendment) Act 2005 to replace this ad hoc scheme. I formally established the Board on 17th February 2006 and appointed Mr. Dick Langford, former CEO of City Cork VEC, as Chairperson along with 8 other Board members, four of whom are former residents.
The functions of the Board are laid down in Section 25 of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (Amendment) Act 2005. The principal functions are:
(a) to pay grants to former residents of institutions and their relatives to assist them in availing of educational services
(b) to determine and publish the criteria by reference to which it will make decisions on applications for the payment of such grants, and
(c) to make available to the persons aforesaid information in relation to the educational services in respect of which grants are payable.
After deducting some €2.5 million expenditure incurred under the ad hoc scheme and allowing for interest of some €0.75 million, the Education Finance Board had a net fund of approximately €11 million at its disposal on establishment.
This money is being managed by the National Treasury Management Agency on behalf of the Board. The Board recently published their criteria for the awarding of grants.
As the Board is independent in its functions, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on an individual application before the Board.
346 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for Education and Science when a committee (details supplied) in County Donegal will receive a reply from the school planning section, Tullamore, County Offaly; the reason for the delay in receiving this reply; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43463/06]
An application has been received from County Donegal VEC to establish a Gaelcholáiste in Buncrana from September 2007 and this is under active consideration in my Department. A decision on the granting of recognition to the proposed school will be conveyed to the VEC when the assessment is finalised.
347 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if a design team has been appointed for the required extension to a school (details supplied) in County Kildare; and the status of the architectural planning phase at this point in time. [43474/06]
A Design Team was appointed on the School referred to by the Deputy on the 28th November last and the School Authorities were instructed to inform their Design Team to prepare a stage 1/2 submission (Outline sketch scheme with costings). The Stage 1/2 documentation is now awaited and when this is received in my Department, my officials will arrange a meeting with the School Authorities and their Design Team in order to evaluate the documentation. It is envisaged that unless there are very exceptional circumstances involved, the meeting will be sufficient to authorise the project to progress to the next stages of architectural planning. Progression of the project to tender and construction will be considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2007-2011.
348 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science when the new gaelscoil (details supplied) in County Kildare will go to tender. [43475/06]
The building project for the school referred to by the Deputy was one of sixty two projects that I announced to commence the architectural planning process in January of this year. The brief for the project consists of a 16 classroom Generic Repeat Design with an additional bolt-on Special Education Tuition room. A Design Team was appointed on the project in July of this year and following a briefing seminar in my Department's Offices in Tullamore, the Design Team were instructed to proceed to Stage 3 (detailed design with costings) of my Department's Design Team Procedures.
The Stage 3 documentation is now awaited and when this is received in my Department, my officials will, if necessary, arrange a meeting with the School Authorities and their Design Team in order to evaluate the documentation. Once the Stage 3 is approved, the new school building project will proceed, in accordance with the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2007-2011, to advanced design and thereafter to tender and construction.
349 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if the outline sketch scheme of the new gaelscoil (details supplied) in County Kildare has been received; and when this project will go to tender. [43476/06]
The Stage 1/2 documentation (outline sketch scheme with costings) in respect of the school referred to by the Deputy has not been received to-date, but when the stage 1/2 submission is received in my Department, my officials will arrange a meeting with the School Authorities and their Design Team to evaluate the documentation. It is envisaged that unless there are very exceptional circumstances involved, the meeting will be sufficient to authorise the project to progress to the next stages of architectural planning.
On completion of architectural planning, progression of the project to tender and construction will be considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2007-2011.
350 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if a design team has been appointed for the new national school for Kill, County Kildare. [43478/06]
The new school building project for Kill is one of the 80 projects which I recently approved for the commencement of architectural planning. The school authority will be attending an information session shortly on the next steps to initiate the design phase of the project.
351 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if a design team has been appointed for the new national school for Ardclough, County Kildare. [43480/06]
A new school building project for Ardclough is one of 80 projects which I recently approved for the commencement of architectural planning. The school authority will be attending an information session shortly on the next steps to initiate the design phase of the project.
352 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of national school teachers in County Kildare; the number of national school resource teachers in County Kildare; and the number of pupils in national schools in County Kildare. [43483/06]
The total number of national school teachers on my Department's payroll in Kildare in September 2006 was 1,271. The total number of special needs teachers in Co. Kildare for the 2005/2006 school year was 226. The total number of pupils for the 2005/2006 school year was 22,298. This includes pupils in special classes and traveller pupils.
353 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science when a design team will be appointed for the required extension to a school (details supplied) in County Kildare. [43485/06]
The Department has received an application for major capital funding from the management authority of the school to which the Deputy refers. The application has been assessed in accordance with the published prioritisation criteria for large scale projects. Progress on the proposed works is being considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme from 2007 onwards.
354 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if the implementation report in relation to commencing the relevant sections of the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 which covers the provision of mandatory educational plans for pupils with special educational needs has been received; and the action she will take to implement the sections of the Act. [43486/06]
The National Council for Special Education (NCSE) recently submitted its Implementation Report which sets out its views and recommendations on a plan for the implementation of the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004. The report is currently being examined by my Department.
While the report focuses on the implementation of the Education for Persons with Special Education Needs Act 2004, it does have regard to the implementation of Part 2 of the Disability Act 2005 and the need for the health and education sectors to work in close co-operation to ensure the proper implementation of both acts.
355 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a person (details supplied) in County Mayo was refused the top-up grant. [43518/06]
Officials of my Department contacted the Higher Education Grants Section of Mayo County Council concerning the candidate referred to by the Deputy. Mayo County Council confirmed that the candidate was not eligible for the Top-Up grant as the reckonable income exceeded the prescribed limit for the academic year 2006-07, which is €16,748. I regret that it is not possible to award the top-up grant where reckonable income exceeds the prescribed limits, irrespective of the particular circumstances.
356 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Education and Science if arrangements will be made to provide one to one tuition for a person (details supplied) in Dublin 1 with dyslexia and ADHD. [43533/06]
The pupil referred to by the Deputy is currently enrolled in a special class with a pupil teacher ratio of 6:1. I understand that the pupil also has the support of an individual special needs assistant (SNA).
As the Deputy is aware, the National Council for Special Education (NCSE), through the local special educational needs organisers (SENO), is responsible for processing applications from schools for special needs supports.
My officials have been in contact with the local SENO who is not aware of any application for additional resources for this pupil. It is open to the parents-guardians or school to contact the SENO regarding any special educational needs that the pupil may have. Contact with the relevant SENO can be made by contacting the NCSE, Mill Street, Trim, Co. Meath, telephone number (046) 948 6400 or by accessing the NCSE website at www.ncse.ie.
357 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science if, in the interest of aiding parents, she will consider the compilation of a register of qualified teachers offering home tuition services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43551/06]
370 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 444 of 28 November 2006, if she will allow a period for such teachers to gain the required qualification to satisfy her Departmental rules; if she will postpone the implementation of the trained primary school teacher rule beyond January 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43680/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 357 and 370 together.
As the Deputies are aware the home tuition scheme provides funding to parents to provide education at home for children who, for a number of reasons such as chronic illness, are unable to attend school. The scheme was extended in recent
years to facilitate tuition for children awaiting a suitable educational placement.
Having reviewed a number of applications for home tuition, details regarding the qualifications of some of the proposed tuition providers gave rise to concern. The Deputies will appreciate, that as home tuition takes place outside of the normal school framework, the need to ensure that tuition providers are appropriately qualified to give education to the children concerned. The usual requirement is a fully qualified teacher. However, other qualifications are acceptable depending on the individual needs of the child. A comprehensive review of qualifications has taken place in consultation with my Department's Inspectorate resulting in a definitive list of qualifications acceptable under the scheme as appropriate to the individual pupils. In this context the clarity that now exists in relation to qualifications should assist the parents concerned in sourcing suitable tutors and there are no current plans to compile a data base of tuition providers.
Nominated tuition providers with qualifications other than teaching qualifications had been accepted for the first school term this year to allow time to undertake the review. Officials in my Department are currently communicating the status of the tuition providers to the parents concerned. In cases where the tuition provider is not approved a direction is being given to recruit a tuition provider with suitable qualifications. However my Department is prepared to facilitate parents/guardians who experience difficulties in this regard by extending the sanction with the current tuition provider until the end of this school year to facilitate the recruitment process.
It is important to stress that the allocation of tuition hours under the scheme was never at issue in the context of the review of qualifications in this regard.
358 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will define the differences between a classroom assistant and a special needs assistant; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43552/06]
The Deputy will be aware that the National Council for Special Education (NCSE), through the local Special Educational Needs Organisers (SENOs), is responsible for processing applications for special educational needs supports from primary and post primary schools. Special Need Assistant (SNA) support is provided specifically to address the care needs of pupils with special educational needs. The nature and level of support provided is based on the assessed needs of the individual child having regard to the criteria set out in my Department's circulars.
The post of Special Need Assistant is often referred to as a classroom assistant post. However, I should clarify that the posts which are funded on my Department's payroll to provide support for children with special needs are SNA posts and are defined as such both in terms of the payscale which applies and the governing circulars.
My Department does not provide funding to schools in respect of a separate category of classroom assistant posts.
359 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science if she has received an application from a school (details supplied) for funding to provide science laboratory facilities; when she expects to make a decision in respect of this application; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43553/06]
363 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science if she has received an application from a school (details supplied) for funding to provide science laboratory facilities; when she expects to make a decision in respect of this application; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43578/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 359 and 363 together.
The school referred to by the Deputy has applied for funding under the Summer Works Scheme 2007 for the provision of Science and Home Economics Specialist Rooms. My Department is currently assessing all applications received from schools for funding under this programme. The list of successful applicants will be published as soon as possible.
360 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of new science laboratories that have been funded by her Department in second level schools in the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43554/06]
364 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of new science labs that have been funded by her Department in second level schools in the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43579/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 360 and 364 together.
As part of the multi-annual school building programme my Department has invested heavily in modernising school facilities throughout the country including science facilities in post-primary schools. Typically this investment involves the provision of modern science facilities in new post-primary schools or the upgrading of science facilities in existing schools either as part of a school building project or as a dedicated investment to facilitate the teaching of science.
Additionally I have provided for class materials, basic general equipment and chemicals for practical work for the Sciences.
My Department also spent in excess of €13m in 2004 to facilitate the introduction of a revised Junior Science syllabus. Schools received a basic grant of €3,500 per science laboratory to enable them to provide the new curriculum. Additional funding was made available to schools where other specified equipment was required. In addition, certain schools identified as needing new or refurbished science laboratories as a result of a 1998 national survey received funding. Funding was also available this year to schools that had not originally applied for the basic grant of €3,500 per science laboratory and for other specified equipment to enable them to provide the new curriculum.
Schools have also received funding under the Summer Works Scheme in 2004 and 2005 to refurbish science laboratories. In the application for funding under the 2006 Summer Works Scheme post-primary schools were asked to specifically identify and provide details of any science and technology upgrade or refurbishment projects separate from any other projects being applied for so that consideration could be given to approving these projects for 2006. I approved funding for 26 such projects under the 2006 Summer Works Scheme.
The Deputy can be assured that my Department will continue to take a proactive approach in the provision of the necessary facilities for the teaching of science in schools.
361 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children in the Greater Dublin area, under the age of 16 years, not attending school; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43555/06]
The Education (Welfare) Act, 2000 established the National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) as the single national body with responsibility for school attendance. The Act provides a comprehensive framework promoting regular school attendance and tackling the problems of absenteeism and early school leaving. The general functions of the Board are to ensure that each child attends a recognised school or otherwise receives a certain minimum education.
In January 2005, the National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) issued guidelines to the management authorities of all primary and post primary schools on reporting student absences,suspensions and expulsions. These guidelines advise that a school must report to the NEWB where a decision has been taken to expel a student. Schools are also required to periodically report to the NEWB on student absences. There are seven possible categories of absence which are reported on.
As regards the specific data requested by the Deputy on the number of children in the Greater Dublin area, under the age of 16 years, not attending school, I have requested the NEWB to provide this information to me as a matter of urgency. I will reply directly to the Deputy when the data is to hand.
362 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science when the purpose built special education unit within a school (details supplied) in County Kildare will be opened; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43556/06]
The Deputy will be aware of my commitment to ensuring that all children included those with autism receive an education appropriate to their needs.
Officials from my Department, the National Council for Special Education and the Health Service Executive met with members of the Board of Management of the school in June 2006 in order to progress the opening of the unit and the NCSE has continued to liaise with the school in this regard.
I share the Deputy's desire to see this purpose built facility for children with autism utilized to full potential and have requested the NCSE for an immediate update of progress.
365 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science if persons (details supplied) in County Offaly attending a Church of Ireland national school in County Offaly will be permitted to use buses travelling from near their homes in Lorrha, County Tipperary, to the school as it is the closest Church of Ireland school to them; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43583/06]
The pupils referred to by the Deputy are not eligible for school transport to the school in question as they reside in a ‘closed school area'. In the case of amalgamations, pupils residing in a ‘closed school area' are eligible to the school of amalgamation only. The parents/pupils should check with their local Bus Éireann office regarding the availability of spare seating and any other procedures to be followed in this case.
366 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science the outstanding issues to be resolved in relation to a school (details supplied) in Dublin 9 and the expected timescale for the completion of all refurbishment works in order for the proposed amalgamation to proceed, and for accommodation to become available for another school. [43637/06]
A technical assessment has been carried out on the buildings to which the Deputy refers. On foot of this report, the Department will be liaising with the school authorities concerned to advance the projects as quickly as possible.
367 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science the actions she proposes to take to provide suitable school accommodation for a school (details supplied) in Dublin 11 where the whole school evaluation found that the accommodation is very poor, the classrooms are unsuited to the needs of the teachers and students and there is insufficient outdoor space for physical education activities; and if she will ensure that this matter is given urgent attention. [43639/06]
The Department is aware of the need to re-locate the school to which the Deputy refers. Possible accommodation solutions are currently under consideration and when a decision has been taken the school authority will be contacted directly.
368 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 492 of 20 June 2006, the status of the project; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43678/06]
As part of the expansion of the devolved scheme for primary school building works, a grant of €820,000 was sanctioned in March 2006 under the Small Schools Scheme to enable the management authority of the school in question to provide a new three classroom school.
The Devolved Initiative allows Boards of Management to address their accommodation and building priorities with a guaranteed amount of funding and gives Boards of Management control of the building project.
I understand that the Board of Management has sought Planning Permission for the construction of this school.
369 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a course in an institution (details supplied) is not approved by her Department for the higher education grant scheme; her plans to review this; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43679/06]
The Higher Education Grants Scheme operates under the Local Authorities (Higher Education Grants) Acts, 1968 to 1992. An approved institution is defined to mean a university, college or other institution of higher education in so far as it provides a course, or courses, of not less than two years duration at Undergraduate level and not less than one years duration at Postgraduate level, being a course or courses of which the Minister for Education and Science approves for the time being for the purposes of the Acts.
The Higher Education Grants Scheme specifies a list of approved institutions for the purposes of the Scheme. The approved institutions are mainly comprised of publicly funded third level institutions. In this regard, the Fitzwilliam Institute is a private college and is not on the list of approved institutions for the purpose of the scheme.
Any general extension to the scope of the grants scheme to include private colleges such as The Fitzwilliam Institute can be considered only in the light of available resources and in the context of competing demands and priorities within the education sector. There are no plans at present to extend the scope of the student support schemes to private colleges.
371 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Defence if he will confirm the acreage of a property (details supplied) in the ownership of his Department; the townlands this property occupies; the number of military personnel employed there; the number of civilian employees; the acreage which is under lease to local farmers; the area of this property which is the preferred area that his Department would agree to for the new proposed development; and if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the local community are welcoming the proposal. [43645/06]
My Department administers an area of some 3,352 acres at the property referred to by the Deputy. The property is vested in the Minister for Finance and is situated in a number of townlands which includes Ballinrush, Ballinvoher, Gortnahown, Killally West, Caherdrinny, Graigue, Skeheen Upper, Glenatlucky, Whitebog, Toor, Killakane, Pollardstown, Ballybeg and Turbeagh. All of the lands in question are used for military training and exercises, including the firing of live ammunition. For land management purposes, 136 acres approximately are let to local farmers on an 11-month basis, a further 76 acres are let to Teagasc at Moorepark, for agricultural research purposes, while the remaining area (excluding the Camp and ancillary infrastructure) in excess of 3,000 acres approximately is grazed by sheep on a per capita basis.
There are ten civilian employees attached to the location in question along with one Land Steward and an Assistant Land Steward employed on a full time basis. During peak training periods, a further four civilians are employed on a contract basis.
It is not the practice for security reasons to give details regarding the numbers of military personnel serving at individual military locations.
The proposal referred to by the Deputy is currently under examination in my Department.
372 Mr. McHugh asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the statement of Galway County Council that of the twenty five water and sewerage schemes in County Galway scheduled to start in 2007 only a bundle of four schemes are expected to meet the programme start date of 2007; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43372/06]
I am not aware of any such statement. I assume that the Question relates to the schemes approved for funding and authorised to start in 2007 in my Department's Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007, published in December 2005. Local authorities are responsible for the procurement of individual projects and the funding allocated in the Programme is available to Galway County Council for the construction of these schemes.
My Department is awaiting the submission of Preliminary Reports, Contract Documents or other necessary information by Galway County Council in relation to the majority of the schemes referred to. In the remaining cases the Department has such submissions under examination. Submissions from the Council which are with the Department are been dealt with as quickly as possible.
In order to accelerate progress under the Water Services Investment Programme generally, I have introduced a number of measures to streamline the approval procedures. I have reduced the number of stage approvals local authorities are required to obtain from my Department and also simplified Water Services Pricing Policy procedures and affordability criteria. I have also introduced a new Project Control System to assist local authorities to adopt a consistent "best practice" approach to managing the planning, procurement and construction stages of all water services projects.
I am anxious to see the Galway schemes completed as quickly as possible and my Department is giving every possible assistance to Galway County Council in that regard, including the provision of ongoing funding for two additional engineering posts in the Council's Water Services Section.
373 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his plans for carbon or green credits; the way in which he will allocate these credits; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43403/06]
I refer to the reply to Question No. 192 of 5 October 2006.
Carbon credits will be used by the government for the sole purpose of achieving compliance with Ireland's commitment under the Kyoto Protocol to limit its greenhouse gas emissions to 13% above 1990 levels.
The Government has stated its intention to purchase up to a maximum of 3.607 million allowances or credits per annum over the Kyoto Protocol commitment period 2008-2012. Budget 2007 announced a commitment to provide up to €270 million for the purchase of allowances or credits.
Following the approval of the Dáil on 30 November, I signed a contract with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development for €20 million to source carbon allowances through the Bank's Multilateral Carbon Credit Fund. Last Friday I published the Carbon Fund Bill 2006 and this is scheduled for second stage debate on Thursday 14 December. I am also seeking Dáil approval this week to enter into agreements with the World Bank with a view to an investment of a further €20 million.
374 Ms Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will provide a complete list of grants under the 2006 biodiversity plan; the value of each grant made; the estimated cost of the scheme in 2006; the projected cost of the scheme for 2007; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43417/06]
I assume that the Question refers to the Biodiversity Fund, which I announced in November 2005, following the publication of the Interim Review of the National Biodiversity Plan. The Fund was one of a range of initiatives which I announced to support the ongoing implementation of the National Biodiversity Plan, and is administered by the Heritage Council.
A total of €500,000 was allocated to the Fund in 2006 and a similar funding will be made available in 2007. Details of individual grants paid are available from the Heritage Council and are also available on the Council's website.
375 Ms Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will provide a complete list of grants made under the waste management infrastructural grant scheme; the value of each grant made in 2006; the estimated cost of the scheme in 2006; the cost for each year since the scheme started; the smallest, the average and the largest individual payment made in each year for which figures are given under the scheme; the projected cost of the scheme for 2007; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43418/06]
The information requested is set out in the following tables.
Since 2002 my Department has allocated over €90 million in capital grants to assist local authorities in the provision of recycling and recovery services. The projects assisted include bring bank networks, civic amenity sites, materials recovery, composting and biological treatment facilities.
Projects for which grants have been allocated can take a number of years to complete as they go through the various project stages, e.g. design, planning, construction, and consequently claims will be submitted and monies paid typically over a number of years. In 2006 to date, and in respect of projects for which monies have been allocated since 2002, a total drawdown of €7,923,310.83 has been achieved.
The projected cost for the scheme in 2007 is €25m.
|
Year |
Paid |
Lowest Payment |
Highest Payment |
Average Payment |
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
|
2002 |
3,657,715.40 |
3,630.00 |
528,713.00 |
261,265.38 |
|
2003 |
5,615,698.48 |
742.87 |
686,199.48 |
83,816.39 |
|
2004 |
20,758,554.09 |
381.15 |
5,891,400.00 |
266,135.30 |
|
2005 |
6,202,252.58 |
2,250.00 |
379,629.59 |
150,051.19 |
|
2006 |
7,923,210.83 |
428.34 |
1,208,571.82 |
240,100.32 |
|
Project |
Grant Allocation |
|
€m |
|
|
Kernanstown Civic Amenity Facility |
0.306 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.057 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.058 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.059 |
|
Plastic Bottle Bring Banks |
0.039 |
|
Inagh Civic Amenity |
0.878 |
|
Inagh Composting Facility |
0.495 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.144 |
|
Civic Amenity Facility |
0.424 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.165 |
|
Raffeen Civic Amenity Facility |
0.604 |
|
Bandon Civic Amenity Facility |
0.481 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.197 |
|
North Strand Civic Amenity |
0.250 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.197 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.062 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.051 |
|
Carrowbrowne Composting Facility |
1.784 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.046 |
|
Ballinasloe Composting Facility |
0.310 |
|
Ballinasloe Civic Amenity Facility |
0.443 |
|
Clifden Civic Amenity Facility |
0.257 |
|
Tuam Civic Amenity Facility |
0.074 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.439 |
|
Athy Civic Amenity Facility |
0.950 |
|
Dunmore Civic Amenity Facility |
0.315 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.142 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.028 |
|
Mountmellick Composting Facility |
0.090 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.038 |
|
Gortnadroma Composting Facility |
0.395 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.149 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.092 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.194 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.240 |
|
Rathroeen Civic Amenity Facility |
0.410 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.111 |
|
Kells Civic Amenity Facility |
0.407 |
|
Trim Civic Amenity Facility |
0.382 |
|
Scotch Corner Materials Recovery Facility |
0.086 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.085 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.092 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.287 |
|
Ballaghveny Civic Amenity Facility |
0.380 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.160 |
|
Tramore Civic Amenity Facility |
0.184 |
|
Dungarvan Civic Amenity Facility |
0.154 |
|
Lismore Civic Amenity Facility |
0.222 |
|
Tramore Composting Facility |
0.127 |
|
Dungarvan Composting Facility |
0.127 |
|
Lismore Composting Facility |
0.105 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.136 |
|
Athlone Civic Amenity Facility |
0.862 |
|
Killurin Civic Amenity Facility |
0.150 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.079 |
|
Total 2002: |
14.999 |
|
Bailieboro Civic Amenity Facility |
0.362 |
|
Corranure Civic Amenity Facility |
0.086 |
|
Ringsend Civic Amenity Facility |
0.381 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
0.981 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.206 |
|
Silliot Hill Composting Facility |
0.522 |
|
Bring Banks Upgrade |
0.025 |
|
Carrick-on-Shannon Civic Amenity Facility |
0.408 |
|
Park Road Civic Amenity Facility |
0.027 |
|
Kilmallock Civic Amenity Facility |
0.637 |
|
Newcastle West Civic Amenity Facility |
0.820 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.058 |
|
Dundalk Civic Amenity Facility |
1.035 |
|
Scotch Corner Materials Recovery Facility (2 projects) |
0.230 |
|
Tullamore Civic Amenity Facility |
1.070 |
|
Ballaghadereen Civic Amenity Facility |
0.386 |
|
Blessington Civic Amenity Facility |
1.108 |
|
Total 2003: |
8.342 |
|
Ennis Civic Amenity Site |
0.3 |
|
Macroom Civic Amenity Site |
1.8 |
|
Letterkenny Civic Amenity Site |
0.754 |
|
Donegal Town Civic Amenity Site |
0.345 |
|
Stranorlar Civic Amenity Site |
0.510 |
|
Bring Banks |
0.319 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
6.546 |
|
Manorhamilton Civic Amenity Site |
0.336 |
|
Drogheda Civic Amenity Site |
1.395 |
|
Cornacass Civic Amenity Site |
0.772 |
|
Carrickmacross Civic Amenity Site |
0.741 |
|
Tubbercurry Civic Amenity Site |
0.610 |
|
Mullingar Civic Amenity Site |
0.903 |
|
Bring Banks Upgrade |
0.064 |
|
Birr Civic Amenity Site |
0.772 |
|
Edenderry Civic Amenity Site |
0.463 |
|
Kilcock Civic Amenity Site |
0.775 |
|
Kells Civic Amenity Site |
0.077 |
|
Ballisodare Green Waste Facility |
0.45 |
|
Cashel Civic Amenity Site |
0.568 |
|
Cashel Transfer Station |
0.987 |
|
In-Vessel Composting |
0.469 |
|
Composting Facility |
2.47 |
|
Dungarvan Materials Recovery Facility |
4.68 |
|
Rosbercon Civic Amenity Site (upgrade) |
0.150 |
|
New Ross Civic Amenity Site |
0.559 |
|
Total 2004: |
27.815 |
|
Shannon Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
Ballyconnell Civic Amenity Site |
0.45 |
|
Kinsale Road Landfill (WEEE Acceptance) |
0.15 |
|
Northside Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
Raffeen Civic Amenity Site |
0.53 |
|
Milford & Dungloe Civic Amenity Sites |
1.6 |
|
Ballymount Materials Recovery Facility |
10 |
|
Biological Treatment |
10 |
|
Coolmine Civic Amenity Site |
0.54 |
|
Carrowbrowne Facilities |
0.7 |
|
Loughrea Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
WEEE Acceptance Facilities |
0.045 |
|
Listowel & Dingle Civic Amenity Sites |
1.8 |
|
Athy Civic Amenity Site |
0.191 |
|
Kyletalesha Civic Amenity Site |
0.622 |
|
Portarlington Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
Mohill Civic Amenity Site |
0.314 |
|
Mungret Civic Amenity Site |
2.605 |
|
Farnagh Composting Facility |
0.03 |
|
Longford Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
Drogheda Civic Amenity Site |
0.729 |
|
Kells Civic Amenity Site |
0.346 |
|
Roscommon Waste Park |
2.3 |
|
Ballaghveny Landfill (WEEE acceptance) |
0.034 |
|
Nenagh Civic Amenity Site (WEEE Acceptance) |
0.027 |
|
Roscrea Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
New Ross Civic Amenity Site |
0.6 |
|
Kilcannon Civic Amenity Site |
0.8 |
|
Arklow Civic Amenity Site |
0.748 |
|
Wicklow Civic Amenity Site |
1.113 |
|
Bray Civic Amenity |
1.148 |
|
Total 2005: |
42.222 |
|
Shannon Recycling Centre |
0.8 |
|
Portable Compactors for Plastics |
0.142 |
|
Portable Compactors for Green Waste |
0.057 |
|
Estuary Recycling Centre |
0.635 |
|
Silliot Hill Composting |
1.109 |
|
Drogheda Civic Amenity Site |
0.671 |
|
Total 2006: |
3.414 |
376 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the amount granted to a local authority in respect of a project (details supplied); if he has satisfied himself that a proper job was done on this register. [43423/06]
In law, the preparation of the Register of Electors is a matter for each local registration authority. It is their duty to ensure, as far as possible and with the cooperation of the public, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Register.
In April 2006, I announced a package of measures to assist local authorities in their work on preparing the 2007/8 Register. These measures included the provision of additional ring-fenced financial resources to support local authorities' own spending in respect of the register campaign and authorities were advised that a contribution of some €6 million can be made available in this regard. €3 million (€92,000 to Mayo County Council) was paid to local authorities in July and a further €2.1 million (€106,109 to Mayo County Council) in register funding is being paid to authorities this month.
Local authorities have carried out an extensive and intensive campaign in respect of the Draft Register for 2007/8, with the information available indicating both significant numbers of additions (379,394) to, and deletions (505,042) from, the Register. Final figures regarding the number of additions to and deletions from the Register will not be known until authorities and County Registrars have completed their work and the final register is published in February. However, on the basis of the work already undertaken, I am satisfied there will be significant improvement in the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Register.
377 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the average response time for ambulances on each night of the week. [43427/06]
My Department has no function in relation to ambulance services.
378 Mr. N. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will approve funding in respect of an application (details supplied). [43438/06]
Since 1980, my Department has given considerable financial assistance towards remedial works undertaken by Cobh Town Council to strengthen areas susceptible to landslides. The assistance takes the form of 100% grants, subject to prior approval of the remedial works by my Department. Since 1980, grants of over €4 million have been paid to Cobh Town Council.
As there has been an ongoing programme of works over almost a quarter of a century, periodic review is important. It is now desirable to quantify the number of projects left to be completed, the estimated completion date and the potential final cost.
Cork County Council will take the lead in this review. A draft brief for the engagement of a specialist advisor in connection with the review has been endorsed by my Department, subject to some adjustments. Cork County Council has also been advised that, if they are of the opinion that immediate remedial works are essential in the interest of public safety, my Department is prepared to consider a proposal from them.
Cork County Council is also free to commit its own resources to meet such works as the council considers necessary. In this regard, I have announced increased Local Government Fund allocations of almost €948 million in general purpose grants to all local authorities, including Cork County Council and Cobh Town Council. Cork County Council will receive €54.8 million from the Fund next year (an increase of over 6%) while Cobh Town Council will receive over €1.3 million (up nearly 8% on its 2006 allocation).
379 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will introduce a national waiver scheme for refuse services, in conjunction with the Department of Social and Family Affairs specifically targeted to help social welfare recipients and people on low incomes and those who have no option but to avail of refuse service from a private operator; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43444/06]
Waste management services have traditionally been provided at a local level, with individual arrangements being locally determined and tailored to local circumstances. The present legal framework, as determined by the Oireachtas, reflects this. In accordance with section 52 of the Protection of the Environment Act 2003, the determination of waste management charges, and any associated waiver scheme, is a matter for the relevant local authority, where it acts as the service provider. Similarly, where a private operator provides the collection service, it is a matter for that operator to determine charges. However, my Department has asked local authorities to engage with commercial waste collectors to agree on arrangements to assist lower income households by offering alternatives to periodic lump-sum payments.
In August this year, I published a consultation paper on options for future regulation of the waste sector. Submissions were invited on whether there is a need for a regulator for the sector, if so on what model of regulator might be most appropriate and on what powers any such regulator should be given. Among the possible powers discussed in the paper is the power to impose a public service obligation so that services can be provided where they would not otherwise be economically feasible. Following consideration of the submissions received, which is currently underway, I intend to finalise further policy proposals.
380 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will immediately appoint an expert group to fast track the selection process and the installation of a permanent water filtration system plan for Ennis, County Clare in view of the continuing boil notices as a matter of urgency. [43456/06]
The Ennis Town Water Supply Treatment Scheme, which will provide a new water treatment plant for Ennis, is approved for construction in my Department's Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007.
My Department issued approval to Clare County Council to invite tenders for the scheme in October 2005. I understand that the closing date set for submission of tenders was 13 October 2006 and that the Council is currently assessing the bids received.
The provision of clean drinking water is a fundamental customer service priority for local authorities. Accordingly my Department has emphasised to Clare County Council the need to accelerate the provision of the new treatment plant and to minimise the disruption and inconvenience caused to Ennis consumers by Boil Water Notices.
In the meantime and to alleviate the problem, my Department provided the Council with funding for a temporary water treatment plant. The Council's report to the Department in relation to the latest Boil Water Notice, caused by technical difficulties with the temporary plant, indicates that a tender recommendation for the new permanent plant will be submitted for Departmental approval in the new year with a view to construction starting before the end of the Spring. I will be closely monitoring progress in that regard.
381 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason he has closed off the opportunity to appeal SAC designations already notified to the EU Commission without allowing a period for landowners to submit appeals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43470/06]
I refer to the reply to Question No. 48 of 12 December 2006.
382 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he will take to extend the closing date for SAC appeals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43471/06]
I refer to the reply to Question No. 48 of 12 December 2006.
383 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will issue regulations under the Local Government Act 2001 to allow by order the establishment of new town councils. [43479/06]
I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 342 of 8 November and 228 of 1 June 2006. The issue remains under review.
384 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has approved the contract documents for the Lower Liffey Valley sewerage scheme. [43481/06]
395 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the stage the upgrade of the Lower Liffey waste water plant in Leixlip is at; if he has considered giving Kildare County Council the go ahead for works to alleviate the smell in Leixlip Village in advance of the expansion of the plant; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43626/06]
I propose to take Questions Nos. 384 and 395 together.
I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 428 and 429 of 22 November 2006. My Department has received no proposals from Kildare County Council in relation to advance works at Leixlip.
385 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, in view of Budget 2007 he will insist on the public service recruitment embargo for local authorities in the greater Dublin area including Counties Kildare, Meath and Wicklow. [43484/06]
I am keeping the overall employment position in the local authority sector under regular review having regard to the need to deliver quality front line services and achieve value for money within the parameters of Government policy on public service employment generally.
386 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has concluded his review of the disabled persons grant scheme; and his view on funding 100% of the grant rather than requiring local authorities to fund 33%. [43487/06]
The review of the Disabled Persons Grant scheme, which incorporates the conditions governing the Essential Repairs Grant scheme and the Special Housing Aid for the Elderly scheme, was recently finalised within my Department. The requirement that local authorities make a contribution from their own resources towards the financing of the scheme has been considered in the context of the overall review. Proposals for the future operation of the schemes are expected to be announced early next year.
387 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when discussions will take place between his Department and Mayo County Council, as stated by Mayo County Council on 28 November 2006 regarding Achill sewerage scheme and the polluter pays principle report; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43501/06]
I refer to the reply to Question No. 316 of 28 September 2006. My Department is examining a further submission received from Mayo County Council earlier this week and a response will issue to the Council immediately.
388 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department assessed the conservation implications of a tree felling operation by a construction company (details supplied) in County Tipperary during 2004; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that this operation was conducted during the nesting season which has given rise to local concern; if he will request a wildlife officer of his Department to investigate same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43502/06]
The development in question is not within any site designated under the Habitats Regulations or the Wildlife Acts. While Section 40 of the Wildlife Act 1976, as amended, protects vegetation from being cut, grubbed, burned or otherwise destroyed during the period from 1 March to 31 August, the legislation also provides for a number of exemptions. For example, section 40 exempts from the provisions the clearance of vegetation in the course of road or other construction works or in the development or preparation of sites on which any building or other structure is intended to be provided.
In these circumstances, it would not be practicable at this stage to commit my Department's resources to investigating the matter referred to in the Question.
389 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government further to Parliamentary Question No. 621 of 1 November 2006, the status of these regional water schemes; the reason for the delay; when he will approve funding for the projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43529/06]
A decision will be conveyed to Roscommon County Council very shortly.
390 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the specific purpose of the €10 million allocated in the Budget 2007 for water infrastructure for local authorities; the allocation to each local authority concerned; when these funds will be issued; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43530/06]
The purpose of this funding is to alleviate pressure on local authorities most affected by the additional operational costs arising in relation to the domestic element of new water services infrastructure. Allocations in respect of this funding will be notified to relevant local authorities shortly.
391 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government further to Parliamentary Question No. 1529 of 27 September 2006, the status of the project to upgrade the north east Roscommon regional water supply; the reason for the delay in responding to the local authority; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43531/06]
I expect a decision to be conveyed to Roscommon County Council very shortly.
392 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his response to a letter (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43544/06]
The letter in question was first received in my Department on 8 November 2006 and acknowledged on that date. The subject matter of the query involved liaison between my Department and the Office of Public Works. A substantive reply to the letter issued on 12 December.
393 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his plans to ensure the preservation and protection of a building (details supplied) in County Kildare in respect of which there have been two arson attempts; if he will directly or through Kildare County Council provide security fencing with a view to ensuring that the building is not damaged further; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43623/06]
The structure in question is in the ownership of Kildare County Council. As such, responsibility for the protection of the structure rests with the County Council to whom detailed queries should be addressed.
However, I understand that the County Council has confirmed that while the lodge house alongside the structure named has been damaged (by the arson attempts which the Deputy refers to) the structure itself and two dovecotes are not affected. Kildare County Council has assured my Department that they are arranging 24 hour security which will remain in place for the foreseeable future. In tandem with this, the County Council is also actively developing a strategy for a viable use for the complex thus ensuring its conservation and preservation in the long term.
394 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the income streams available to local authorities for the purpose of dealing with loans raised for capital purposes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43625/06]
The main income streams available to local authorities to finance loans raised for capital purposes are general-purpose grants from the Local Government Fund, commercial rates, and miscellaneous receipts from fees and local charges. Earlier this week, I announced record levels of general-purpose grants for local authorities for 2007. I allocated a total sum of €948m, representing an increase of €70m or 8% over the record amount provided in 2006 and an increase of some 2.6 times the initial allocation funded in 1997.
396 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the main differences between the REP scheme and the proposed national compensation scheme for commonage farmers who are not in the REP scheme but are affected by de-stocking regulations; if the amount of livestock units was taken into account when the destocking of sheep on mountains for commonage framework plans was being drawn up. [43635/06]
Adherence to the grazing restrictions prescribed in a commonage framework plan is a requirement of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition and therefore a condition for receipt of Single Farm Payments.
In the Owenduff/Nephinbeg Special Protection Area (SPA), it is a condition of the Notifiable Actions for the SPA that farmers be in an approved agri-environmental plan. This is necessary because of the poor condition of the peatland habitat of the SPA generally and the lack of recovery in the commonage area, specifically, since the commonage plans were initially prepared.
The REPS scheme, which is administered by the Department of Agriculture and Food, is a per hectare payment for commonage lands, regardless of the restrictions, whereas the NPWS farm plan compensated the farmer for the actual loss suffered in farming in the required way. In the case of destocking, payment in the NPWS scheme is for destocked sheep.
In the destocking calculation, all livestock (including cattle) are converted to ewe equivalents. In the case of commonages, sheep are required to be destocked first in all cases and farmers cannot voluntarily destock cattle instead of sheep. However, in the rare cases where cattle destocking is an environmental requirement of the farm plan, compensation will also be paid for this destocking.
397 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of cycling officers by each local authority in each of the past five years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43642/06]
The information requested is not available in my Department. Staffing returns received from local authorities do not contain the classification of employee referred to in the question.
398 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has examined the findings of the European Environment Agency’s report which cited Dublin as a negative planning example; the conclusions that have been drawn; the policy responses he is considering; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43647/06]
I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 103 and 107 of 12 December 2006.
399 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has received a submission from Fingal County Council in respect of a grant towards the cost of the replacement of the steel windows in local authority houses (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if so, when it is expected that he will be in a position to respond to the request. [43670/06]
Fingal County Council has submitted a proposal to my department in respect of a Remedial Works Scheme to Mourne View Estate in Skerries. This proposal is currently under examination.
