Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 11 Dec 2008

Vol. 670 No. 3

Written Answers.

The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised].
Questions Nos. 1 to 8, inclusive, answered orally.

Departmental Agencies.

Ulick Burke

Question:

9 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Finance the implications in terms of a reduction in staff numbers and savings in annual costs of the programme of rationalisation of State agencies outlined in budget 2009. [45145/08]

In my Budget Statement on 14 October last, I announced that the Government had decided to implement 30 rationalisation decisions spread across 11 Government Departments. The details of the rationalisations, which will result in a reduction of some 41 bodies, were set out in Annex D of the Summary Budget Measures.

Implementation of these rationalisation decisions, which are a matter for the relevant parent Government Departments, involves amalgamating bodies, reassigning legislative and administrative functions, and discontinuing bodies in some cases, is a complex exercise. In light of this, my Department has requested all relevant Departments to prepare Implementation Plans by the 12th of December. Each Plan should cover the projected savings and the timeframes for implementation.

Consequently, it is not possible at this stage to identify the specific savings that this round of rationalisations will deliver or to set out a precise deadline for their delivery, as most of the proposals involve the amendment of legislation. However, it is Government policy that these changes should be implemented urgently with the objective of enhancing the relationship between citizens and the State while maximising the level of savings.

While cost-savings and economy are important, I wish to emphasis that alongside major savings in administrative overheads including staff numbers, a key outcome of this process is to deliver a more citizen-friendly system of government with better, more focused delivery of services.

I also hope to identify further bodies to be rationalised in the context of the next Estimates process.

House Repossessions.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

10 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance his views on the establishment of a fund or other mechanism to prevent a huge increase in house repossessions over the 2009 to 2010 period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45358/08]

I have no plans to introduce such a scheme.

As the Taoiseach said in the House earlier this week, the Government has been pro-active in seeking to safeguard the interests of households that experience difficulties in meeting their mortgage payments owing to circumstances beyond their control. A particular priority is to ensure as much as possible that difficulties in relation to mortgage arrears do not result in legal proceedings for home repossession.

One of the most important recent actions taken by the Government has been to include a mandatory requirement that banks operating in Ireland participating in the Guarantee Scheme confirm their compliance with the Irish Banking Federation (IBF) Code of Practice on Mortgage Arrears. This is a detailed and robust Code which has been operated successfully by banks in Ireland since 2000 and has long had a positive impact on the mortgage market here as evidenced by the very low number of Court Orders for repossession attributable to mainstream lenders that subscribe to the Code. The other IBF and Irish Mortgage Council members comply with the IBF Code on a voluntary basis.

There are two important supports under the Social Welfare system for people who find themselves experiencing difficulty in making their mortgage payments. The Mortgage Interest Supplement scheme provides short-term income support to those eligible who are unable to meet their mortgage interest repayments. My Department understands that about €20 million has been paid out under the scheme to-date in 2008. In addition, the Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS), is a national, free, confidential and independent service for people in debt or in danger of getting into debt.

The Financial Regulator's Consumer Protection Code (CPC) applies to home loan providers operating in the State. It requires mortgage lenders to undertake suitability assessments before offering a product or service to consumers. It also requires the regulated provider to contact the consumer as soon as it becomes aware that a mortgage account is in arrears irrespective of the amount of the arrears. Under the CPC, the regulated provider must have in place a procedure for handling accounts in arrears which includes a requirement that lenders should agree a remedial action plan with a borrower as soon as it detects arrears starting to emerge and to try to assist the borrower to manage his or her financial commitments and not allow the situation to worsen.

Home re-possession should be, and generally is, the last resort for the lender and the preferred method of dealing with arrears cases should be early intervention. Although the number of cases involving applications for possession orders has increased, it should be noted that this is from a low base. In addition, orders are not always granted and do not always represent residential mortgages nor are they always followed through by the lender. Levels remain low compared to historical averages and in comparison to similar jurisdictions such as the UK.

In the light of all of the above, I am satisfied that adequate safeguards are currently in place to minimise home re-possessions in Ireland. However the Government will continue to monitor the situation carefully and will of course consider the requirement for any further responses in order that the legitimate interests of mortgage holders are safeguarded.

Foreign Direct Investment.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

11 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance if he or officials in his Department have made contact with the transition team of President-elect Obama; if discussions have taken place, or if correspondence has been exchanged, with respect to possible reforms to the US corporation tax regime and their possible implications for Ireland; if such discussions are scheduled for the coming months; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45372/08]

P. J. Sheehan

Question:

41 Deputy P. J. Sheehan asked the Minister for Finance the meetings that he has had to ensure that the needs of US companies based here are not adversely affected by moves to change the tax rules in the United States. [45224/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 11 and 41 together.

I understand that President-elect Obama is at present concentrating on the appointment of his Cabinet and that it will be some time before we have a firm idea of the make up of the specific policy teams in the various Government Departments. In the circumstances I think the Deputies will appreciate that it is too early to be seeking dialogue in relation to specific tax or any other issues, with an administration which has not yet taken up office.

It is the case that President-elect Obama was involved in one of two Bills introduced in the US Senate aimed at curtailing tax haven abuse. Both Bills contained a list of 34 countries that have been designated as tax havens in Internal Revenue Service court filings. However, it is important to remember that Ireland does not appear on that list. That said I am always mindful of any international developments that could potentially impact on foreign direct investment here and in that respect we will continue to closely monitor developments.

Tax Yield.

Richard Bruton

Question:

12 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance if he has assessed the impact on retail sales here and on VAT receipts of the differential of 6.5 points on VAT in the North and in the UK. [45210/08]

The Budget increase of 0.5% in the standard VAT rate is estimated to yield the Exchequer €208 million in 2009 and €227 million in a full year.

As part of a fiscal stimulus package, the UK Government reduced their standard VAT rate from 17.5% to 15% on a temporary basis with effect from 1 December 2008 to 31 December 2009. I have no plans to make a similar reduction in the standard VAT rate in Ireland or to reduce the rate to the UK level of 15%.

It is not possible to estimate the effect on Exchequer revenues of tax changes in other Member States. In any case, I would point out that the weakening of sterling has had a far more significant impact on relative prices than any VAT changes in this regard.

It must be recognised that our starting point is different from the UK's. We already have a low taxation economy, especially in the area of direct taxation, both income and corporation taxes, which has a direct impact on all employment in the State. This lower starting position for direct taxation makes it is more difficult to reduce taxes further.

Already we are borrowing over 10% of all day to day spending on public services (before capital spending). This is unsustainable and we faced difficult choices in bringing forward corrective measures. The estimated €227m that will accrue in a full year from the VAT increase will go some way towards funding necessary public services.

Each 1 percentage point reduction in our standard VAT rate would cost around €450 million in a full year. For Ireland to reduce the standard VAT rate by 2.5 percentage points would cost around €1,125 million in a full year. For Ireland to reduce the standard VAT rate to the UK level of 15%, which would mean a reduction in the standard VAT rate of 6.5 percentage points, this would cost almost €3 billion in a full year. This is equivalent to around two and a half times the amount of revenues to be raised in a full year through the new income levy.

Some of the goods and services that will be affected by the increase in the standard rate are alcohol, cigarettes, cars, petrol, electrical equipment, furniture, telecommunications, cosmetics, confectionery, soft drinks and adult clothing and footwear. The effect of the 0.5% increase in the standard rate is that the price of goods and services, which apply at this rate, will increase by 0.41%. This equates to an increase of 8 cent on a good costing €20, or 41 cent on a good costing €100.

It must be also be recognised that around half the value of goods and services purchased in the State are not subject to the standard rate of VAT and therefore are unaffected by the change in the standard rate. All Government services, local authorities, hospitals and schools etc., are exempt from VAT. The zero rate of VAT applies to the majority of foodstuffs, oral medicines, books and children's clothes and shoes. In addition, housing, electricity, gas, domestic fuels, restaurant services, and labour intensive services such as hairdressing and shoe repair, are applicable at the 13.5% reduced rate of VAT.

Although the reduction in the UK standard VAT rate will have an impact on the price differential on some goods between the North and the South, I would point out that the UK has increased excise on alcohol, cigarettes, petrol and diesel to offset the 2.5% reduction in VAT on these items. Consequently there will be no reduction in the price of these products in Northern Ireland as a result of the reduction in the UK VAT rate to 15%.

As a small open economy, many of our standard rated goods are imported, and cutting the VAT rate could benefit the economies from which we import more than our own. In other words, while, it might help the consumer, it would not be the most effective way of helping our own economy.

There are other means of stimulating the economy, outside of the VAT system. The Government is providing a long term fiscal stimulus through capital investment of approximately 5% of GNP, which is twice the average in the EU. This fiscal stimulus will not only support jobs in the short term but will also add to our long term productive capacity.

Irish taxation policy of low direct taxation has given us a significant competitive advantage over the past 15 years. We have ensured that we have had the lowest levels of direct taxation on income, therefore we have had marginally higher indirect taxation. That model of taxation has worked well for our economy and will be even more important now in leading us back to the path of economic growth.

Public Service Review.

Olwyn Enright

Question:

13 Deputy Olwyn Enright asked the Minister for Finance the terms of reference and the proposed order of programme review by the advisory group chaired by Colm McCarthy; if the analysis will be published; and the decisions taken on a programme by programme basis. [45176/08]

I refer the Deputy to the Government Statement on Transforming Public Services of 26 November 2008 which stated that the objectives of the Special Group are to:—

a. Review the scope for reducing or discontinuing Expenditure Programmes with a view to eliminating the current budget deficit by 2011.

b. To this end, analyse and make recommendations on reducing the numbers employed in each area of the Public Service having regard to:—

i. the need to identify and prioritise particular output targets and areas;

ii. the achievement of greater efficiency and economy in the delivery of all services;

iii. the scope for rationalising and streamlining delivery of public services in the consumers' interest.

c. Make recommendations on reallocation of staffing or expenditure resources between public service organisations as appropriate to deliver the objectives set out in the Programme for Government.

d. Examine and make recommendations for further rationalisation of State agencies beyond the rationalisation proposals and principles set out in Budget 2009.

As I elaborated in my comments at that time, the Special Group's examination of all programmes funded through public expenditure will identify options for savings in the context of the Government's fiscal objectives as set out in Budget 2009. It will also ensure that public expenditure is being used to address relevant priority policy objectives in the current fiscal environment and the overall efficiency of the public service will also be examined, including any ways of doing business that are out of step with the needs of a modern, responsive public service.

The Group consists of Mr. Colm McCarthy (Chair) and Mr. Donal McNally as core Members and they will be assisted by Mr. Pat McLoughlin, Mr. Maurice O'Connell, Mr. William Slattery and Ms. Mary Walsh. It will establish its own working methodology and any vacancy arising in the Group will be filled by me.

The Group will report to me every two months and will submit a final report to me by the end of June 2009.

The Special Group's analysis and recommendations will assist me and my Government colleagues to identify economies which can be made on the scale necessary to ensure that the public finances are brought under control in a short and economically prudent timeframe. The Group's conclusions will accordingly be considered on an ongoing basis in the context of preparing the Estimates of Expenditure for 2010 and later years, and publication or otherwise will be decided on in that context.

Capital Projects.

Andrew Doyle

Question:

14 Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Finance the 20 projects on which spot checks were undertaken by the central evaluation unit; and the projects which had issues of potential non-compliance with value for money requirements flagged. [45171/08]

The Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit (CEEU) in my Department has undertaken a substantial programme of direct spot checks of individual capital projects encompassing over 20 projects across six different Departments — Transport; Environment, Heritage and Local Government; Education and Science; Health and Children; Enterprise, Trade and Employment; and Arts, Sport and Tourism.

On completion, a final report on each spot-check is submitted to the relevant Department. Final reports have been issued in respect of all projects spot-checked to date bar those relating to the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment projects, in respect of which the reports are currently being finalised.

Four projects were examined in the Department of Health and Children: the amalgamated maternity unit at Cork University hospital; phase 2B of Mullingar hospital; redeveloping the infectious diseases services at the Mater Hospital including provision of a new bioterrorism suite; and, phase 1A of the Midwestern Regional Hospital in Ennis.

In the Department of Arts, Sports and Tourism spot-checks were carried out on the Lansdowne Road stadium project; 3 applications under the Sports Capital Programme; and 2 applications under the Arts and Culture Capital Enhancement Support Scheme. Four projects now coming under the aegis of the Department of Transport were examined: Luas line B1 (extension from Sandyford to Cherrywood); the N5 national primary route bypass of Charlestown/Bellaghy; the Western Distributor Road in Sligo; and, additional buses, garage upgrades and a new garage for Bus Átha Cliath.

Two projects now coming under the aegis of the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government were examined: the Susie's Field housing development in Cork City and the Ennis/Clarecastle sewerage scheme. Three projects were examined in the Department of Education and Science: a primary school in Monkstown, a post-primary school in Athlone and an Information Technology building in University College Cork.

Finally, five projects were examined under the aegis of the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment: a Centre for Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET) under the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) CSET grant scheme; two projects under the Principal Investigator grant scheme run by SFI; support under Enterprise Ireland's Productivity Improvement Fund to Company A and an IDA Fixed Asset Grant to Company B.

The objective of the spot-checks and associated final reports is to identify and affirm good practice where it already exists and to promote improvements where it doesn't. As may be expected, these reports have identified many instances of good practice but they have also raised issues on aspects of the planning, appraisal and execution of specific projects by reference to the VFM framework in place. Compliance with this framework is in the first instance the responsibility of the relevant spending Department and upon notification of any issues arising they are expected to consider and take action as appropriate.

I am sure the Deputy will appreciate that as these reports cover a range of issues over a wide range of sectors, further detail in relation to any specific report would be best obtained from the relevant Minister.

House Repossessions.

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

15 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the fact that other jurisdictions facing rising home repossessions are considering a foreclosure holiday whereby those at risk of losing their homes due to mortgage default will not face this risk for a certain period; his views on such an initiative appropriate in the Irish context; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45354/08]

I refer the Deputy to my answer to Dail Question No. 10 (Ref: 45358/08) of 11th December 2008.

I would add that for 2007 as a whole, the total number of houses repossessed by mainstream lenders in Ireland was of the order of 50. My Department understands that the number of repossessions in 2008 to date is in line with this trend. The Deputy may wish to note that the level of repossessions in Ireland is also very low in comparative terms when compared with the UK.

Economic Forecasts.

Dan Neville

Question:

16 Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Finance if he has revised his forecast for the economy in 2009; and the impact this will have on spending and tax receipts forecast. [45204/08]

Jack Wall

Question:

34 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Finance the forecast for Irish economic growth for 2009 in view of further deterioration in the economy since he forecast a 1% contraction in GNP on budget day 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45361/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 16 and 34 together.

As I indicated in my response to an earlier question, the Budget forecasts were that the economy would contract by 1 per cent in 2009. Forecasts produced at the time by the ESRI and by the Central Bank set out a similar economic assessment. Reflecting the unprecedented recent economic developments since then, by end-November the consensus of market forecasters was for economic activity to decline in 2009 by around 3 per cent.

At Budget time, I identified that there were significant risks to the economic and fiscal forecasts for 2008 and for 2009. The further deterioration in tax receipts in 2008, as seen by the end-November Exchequer Returns, the continuing weakening of consumer and investor confidence, adverse currency movements, continued difficulty in the international financial markets and depressed economic conditions, are all evidence of those risks materialising. All indications are that economic activity in 2009 will contract by significantly more than the forecast in the recent Budget with an overall contraction of perhaps somewhere in the region of 3 to 4 per cent. The disimprovement in the 2008 revenue take alone would push the 2009 General Government Deficit up by about €1.5 billion to 7¼ per cent of GDP. In addition, each 1 per cent disimprovement in economic activity in 2009 beyond the contraction of growth of 1 per cent already forecast would increase the General Government Deficit by about ½ per cent.

Upon receipt of the end-year fiscal data and the latest economic data, including the third quarter national income data, a revised economic and fiscal assessment will be prepared by my Department in early January and brought forward for Government consideration. This assessment will reflect the dramatically changed environment now being faced. We are living in a time of unprecedented economic difficulties, and the changed circumstances that have occurred in a short period of time must be addressed.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Dinny McGinley

Question:

17 Deputy Dinny McGinley asked the Minister for Finance if he is satisfied that businesses are getting satisfactory lines of credit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45197/08]

Nobody wants a situation where viable businesses fail because banks will not lend them money. At my meetings with certain financial institutions over the last two weeks, I asked those institutions covered by the Government's guarantee Scheme to consider the contribution that they can make to the economy through appropriate credit initiatives in relation to small and medium sized businesses and otherwise. I have, therefore, welcomed the fact that certain institutions have announced initiatives in this regard.

The Deputy may also wish to be aware that I recently met Mr. Plutarchos Sakellaris, Vice-President of the European Investment Bank, which recently announced that it was providing additional funding through its lending facility for SMEs in the European Union. Mr. Sakellaris confirmed that the Bank has been in discussion with a number of Irish financial institutions about participating in this facility for SMEs and that the EIB hopes that agreements to provide such loan facilities can be finalised as soon as possible. I have urged Irish banks to utilise the facility to the maximum extent possible with a view to making the additional funding available to SMEs as soon as possible. It is therefore pleasing to note that a number of banks have announced their intention to do so.

Additionally, with my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minster for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, I have been in regular contact with the banks regarding the flow of lending to small business.

The Central Bank's October Monthly Statistics showed that lending to the Irish economy was essentially flat in October and this is a matter of concern. However, we should be cautious about drawing strong conclusions from one month's data. Forfás/Enterprise Ireland are surveying 200 clients or County Enterprise Boards and Enterprise Ireland in order to gather more detailed information.

EU Recovery Plan.

John O'Mahony

Question:

18 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Finance if Ireland will take part in the EU Commission’s €200 billion recovery plan, which aims to protect workers, households and entrepreneurs who risk being adversely affected as the financial crisis spreads into the broader economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45213/08]

I welcome the Commission's Plan as an important signal to EU consumers and business that Member States and the Commission are working together to help boost demand and to support business in these difficult times. The Plan recognises, however, that not all Member States are in the same position to help by a further fiscal stimulus but it also says that for those that have such scope they should do so in a co-ordinated manner.

In common with virtually all the world's advanced economies, Ireland is facing substantial economic and fiscal challenges in the immediate future. Ireland, however, is particularly badly affected and our scope to have a further fiscal stimulus on top of what we are already doing is extremely limited. Our priority must be to stabilise and to restore the public finances to good order, to improve competitiveness and to maintain international confidence in Ireland as a place to work and invest.

While the first priority must be to bring our current budgetary position back to balance, thus once again funding current day-to-day spending from current resources, we are continuing to commit substantial funding to public investment to secure the future growth potential of the economy and maintain employment and competitiveness. We are maintaining public investment at about 5% of GNP which is equivalent to almost twice the EU average. We will be borrowing over €8 billion next year to continue to provide essential infrastructure such as roads, schools, public transport and water treatment projects. This investment represents a significant fiscal stimulus and it supports employment in the short term and increases our productivity in the long term.

For a small, open economy such as ours, sustainable increases in living standards can only be achieved by supplying goods and services to the wider global economy. Therefore, we must also ensure the economy is in a position to take advantage of the global recovery when this emerges. Among other things, this will require a greater focus on competitiveness. To support our competitiveness objectives, the Government is committed to maintaining a low burden of taxation on capital and labour and has implemented a range of policies aimed at improving competition in product markets and flexibility in the labour market.

In addition, the recently published Finance Bill sets out a number of measures that are targeted at the enterprise and environment sectors, such as the R&D tax credit changes and the extension to the categories of technology qualifying under the accelerated capital allowances scheme for energy efficient equipment.

Departmental Programmes.

Liz McManus

Question:

19 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for Finance if he is satisfied that he has addressed the issues with e-Government projects that were highlighted by the Comptroller and Auditor General earlier in 2008; the steps he has taken to ensure that lessons have been learned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43652/08]

Since the publication of the report referred to, the following measures have been taken by my Department:

Firstly, as recommended by the Reach Review, the functions of Reach and the Public Service Broker were transferred to my Department in April, following which the recommendations of the Review regarding simplification and the use of off-the-shelf software were implemented.

Secondly, early in the summer, I presented a memo to Government which set out a new approach to eGovernment, particularly focussing on those services benchmarked by the European Union, and services identified in the agreed Dáil joint motion on eGovernment of 30th April 2008. Currently, my Department is meeting with various Departments and Agencies to establish what measures can be taken in the short-term, and to agree with them how they will make progress in the medium-term. An initial report to Government will be made in February.

Finally, the Deputy will be aware of the recent Government Statement on Transforming Public Services, and the numerous clear commitments on eGovernment that were made in it.

It is clear that lessons have been learned, and that effective action is being taken to deal with any issues that have arisen.

Banking Sector Regulation.

Mary Upton

Question:

20 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Finance his views on stronger legislation against predatory lending, particularly so called sub-prime lending; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45371/08]

At the outset, I would point out to the Deputy that the Government has taken steps last October under Section 19 of the Markets in Financial Instruments and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 2007, which amended Part V of the Central Bank Act, 1997, to provide for an appropriate system of authorisation and supervision by the Financial Regulator of retail credit firms engaged in specialist or so-called sub-prime lending and home reversion providers not previously subject to financial regulation in respect of lending activities. The primary purpose of this amendment was to extend to customers of these firms the benefit of the consumer protections provided for in the Financial Regulator's Consumer Protection Code. This regulatory regime is in place since 1 February 2008.

Consumer credit, including sub-prime lending, is also regulated in Ireland under the Consumer Credit Act 1995. The Act makes detailed provision for the form and content of loan agreements and for advertising of consumer credit. The Financial Regulator has powers of investigation, review and enforcement in relation to matters covered by the Act. Consumer complaints about the performance of creditors with respect to their obligations under the Act also fall within the remit of the Financial Services Ombudsman. The Consumer Protection Act 2007 established the National Consumer Agency with an extensive remit including enforcement powers in relation to unfair commercial practices and unfair terms in consumer contracts. In the case of regulated financial service providers these powers may be exercised by the Financial Regulator.

I am satisfied that the legislative framework now in place provides sufficient powers to the Financial Regulator to discharge its statutory mandate in relation to safeguarding the interests of all consumers.

Question No. 21 answered with Question No. 6.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Seymour Crawford

Question:

22 Deputy Seymour Crawford asked the Minister for Finance if he has set specific requirements in the bank plans submitted under the guarantee scheme for the handling of mortgage arrears and repossessions. [45160/08]

The terms and conditions of the Scheme include paragraph 26 of the Scheme, which states "Each covered institution shall, at such frequency as the Minister shall determine, confirm in writing to the Minister its compliance with the Irish Banking Federation Code of Practice on Mortgage Arrears and the Consumer Protection Code issued by the Regulatory Authority."

Moreover, the Scheme requires each covered institution to report quarterly to the Financial Regulator, providing the Regulator with compliance certificates from: (i) its auditors; and (ii) its chairman and chief executive jointly, confirming compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Scheme.

Discussions are currently ongoing between my Department and the covered institutions regarding the compliance certificates for the first quarter. However, I have been assured by the covered institutions that they are operating in compliance with the Irish Banking Federation's Code of Practice on Mortgage Arrears and the Financial Regulator's Consumer Protection Code.

Fiscal Policy.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

23 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Finance the amount the Exchequer will borrow in 2009; the amount he intends to raise through the National Treasury Management Agency on capital markets in 2009; if a schedule has been established for this debt raising; the recent changes in the cost of Exchequer borrowing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45352/08]

The NTMA have advised me that their annual net funding requirement is determined by the level of the Exchequer Balance and the amount of maturities of existing loans. Based on Budget 2009 projections, the NTMA has advised the market of its funding plans for 2009 which includes a €5 billion bond repayment in April 2009. As such a gross debt issuance requirement of €18.4 billion next year is currently being planned. This will obviously be reviewed in the light of the position at end 2008.

The funding requirement in respect of 2009 will be met by a combination of new syndicated benchmark bond issues and auctions. The NTMA's objective is to further develop a continuous and liquid yield curve for Irish Government bonds. The NTMA has advised me that it is in a comfortable cash position and will decide on the timing of its issuance in the light of market conditions.

The interest rates at which the State can borrow are historically low. However, as a result of the increased borrowing requirement in 2008 and 2009, the interest element of the servicing of the national debt has been forecast to increase from €1,641 million in 2008 to €3,295 million in 2009. The 2009 estimate represents around 2% of GNP and this is in line with the average over the last 10 years.

Decentralisation Programme.

Denis Naughten

Question:

24 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance the timetable for the completion of the decentralisation programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45072/08]

As I announced in the Budget, the Government has reviewed the Decentralisation Programme in light of the changed economic circumstances and identified priority elements on which implementation should proceed at this time. The Government's decision will result in the relocation of approximately 6,000 posts to over 40 locations outside of Dublin in the current phase of the programme. This is made up of 2,600 posts already moved, together with an additional 3,400 posts which are in train. Decisions on the timing of further work on implementation of the balance of the programme are being deferred pending a review in 2011 in light of budgetary developments.

The Decentralisation Implementation Group (DIG) and the Department of Finance will give priority to putting in place arrangements for finalising these projects over the coming period.

The October 2007 DIG report provides the most recent update of the OPW timeframes for the expected completion of permanent accommodation. A review of the property timeframes for permanent accommodation is currently being undertaken based on the OPW's experience to date in relation to property selection and acquisition, brief and design issues, tendering periods, planning issues and contractual arrangements. I expect that an update on timeframes will be finalised over the coming weeks and I will make this information available to the Deputy as soon as possible thereafter.

Public Sector Staff.

Tom Hayes

Question:

25 Deputy Tom Hayes asked the Minister for Finance when it is proposed that staff mobility across the various segments of the public service will commence; and the statutory provisions that will be required to implement it. [45186/08]

On 26 November 2008 the Government published the Report of the Task Force on the Public Service, Transforming Public Services, along with a major policy statement which sets out how the recommendations of the Task Force will be implemented.

The Government statement recognises the need to be able to redeploy people in one part of the Public Service from activities which are no longer priorities, towards new challenges which are often in other areas. This means breaking down the barriers to mobility (organisational, sectoral, professional and geographical) between the different parts of Public Service. It also means having appropriate exit options where people cannot be redeployed.

Work will begin immediately to identify and remove barriers to a unified Public Service labour market. This process will include the preparation of any necessary legislation. It will also require urgent negotiations with the Public Service unions. The Government is committed to bringing forward new arrangements on redeployment and exit options within 12 months.

Tax Code.

Terence Flanagan

Question:

26 Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if measures in respect of promotion of research and development are planned which have not been included in the Finance (No. 2) Bill 2008; and the proposals regarding same. [45182/08]

Apart from the increase in the rate of the tax credit from 20% to 25 %, which I announced in my Budget Statement, the Finance Bill includes a number of other very significant changes to the R&D tax credit scheme including: an option to carry-back unused tax credits for set-off against the previous year's corporate tax liability, thus generating a tax repayment; a further option, where there is insufficient or no corporation tax liability in the previous year, to claim payment of the remaining unused credit which will be paid in instalments over a 3 year period, these options will remove any uncertainty about the availability of the tax credit and ensure that a company will secure the full benefit of a tax credit arising in any year from 2009 over a relatively short period; the permanent setting of 2003 as the base year for calculating incremental R&D expenditure under the scheme. Over time, this will have the effect of turning the scheme into a volume-based scheme.

Finally, the Bill provides that a tax credit will be available in respect of a proportion of the expenditure incurred on a new or refurbished building used in part for R&D activities. Up to now, a building had to be used "wholly and exclusively" for R&D in order to avail of the tax credit on qualifying expenditure. This change reflects the reality that R&D takes place in manufacturing or production environments and not only in discrete laboratory conditions. In making this change, I would hope that we will not only encourage more R&D activity in these environments but that it will also capture the fruits of this additional R&D in production and other activities here.

I have no plans for further changes to the R&D tax credit scheme at this time.

Tax Yield.

Pádraic McCormack

Question:

27 Deputy Pádraic McCormack asked the Minister for Finance his latest forecasts for the tax receipts in 2009 in view of the shortfall in tax receipts in October and November 2008 and the downward revision in forecasting for the economy; the way he plans to allocate the shortfall between higher taxes, higher borrowing or lower spending. [45194/08]

Willie Penrose

Question:

54 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Finance if, in view of the November 2008 Exchequer returns, there is a need to revise his forecast general Government deficit of 6.5% of GDP, or just over €12 billion for 2009; if there will a need for a mini-budget or other measures in the first half of 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45347/08]

Kieran O'Donnell

Question:

69 Deputy Kieran O’Donnell asked the Minister for Finance when he proposes to introduce a supplementary budget for 2009 in view of the decline in Exchequer tax receipts to date in 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45381/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 27, 54 and 69 together.

In the period since the Budget was presented to this House, the economic environment has become considerably more difficult. Many of our trading partners have entered recession and projections for demand in our key export markets have been revised downwards significantly. To put this into perspective, the IMF now expects economic activity in the world's advanced economies to contract next year, the first contraction for this group of countries in the post-war period. On the domestic front, the economic and fiscal data which have become available since the Budget have been poor, confirming that the outlook for next year has deteriorated further.

The November Exchequer Returns show that overall government spending for 2008 is close to what was planned. However, the latest 2008 tax returns reflect the severity of the current economic slowdown which has accelerated considerably both at home and internationally in recent times. The gap between spending levels and tax receipts in 2008 has widened and as a result I now expect that the Exchequer will have to borrow about €13 billion in 2008.

In the Budget my Department projected that the economy would contract by 1 per cent in 2009. Forecasts produced by the ESRI and by the Central Bank set out a similar economic assessment. Reflecting the unprecedented recent economic developments since then, by end-November the consensus of market forecasters was for economic activity to decline in 2009 by around 3 per cent.

At Budget time, I identified that there were significant risks to the economic and fiscal forecasts for 2008 and for 2009. The further deterioration in tax receipts in 2008, as seen by the end-November Exchequer Returns, the continuing weakening of consumer and investor confidence, adverse currency movements, continued difficulty in the international financial markets and depressed economic conditions, are all evidence of those risks materialising. All indications are that economic activity in 2009 will contract by significantly more than the forecast in the recent Budget with an overall contraction of perhaps somewhere in the region of 3 to 4 per cent. The disimprovement in the 2008 revenue take alone would push the 2009 General Government Deficit up by about €1.5 billion to 7¼ per cent of GDP. In addition, each 1 per cent disimprovement in economic activity in 2009 beyond the contraction of growth of 1 per cent already forecast would increase the General Government Deficit by about ½ per cent.

Upon receipt of the end-year fiscal data and the latest economic data, including the third quarter national income data, a revised economic and fiscal assessment will be prepared by my Department in early January and brought forward for Government consideration. This assessment will reflect the dramatically changed environment now being faced. We are living in a time of unprecedented economic difficulties, and the changed circumstances that have occurred in a short period of time must be addressed.

In terms of Government action, I would remind the Deputy that last summer in response to the weakness in tax receipts, we took steps in relation to the growth in public expenditure. Then in the autumn we decided to bring forward the Budget so as to address the fiscal situation. In the Budget we took various measures needed to safeguard the public finances as well as underpinning economic activity. For instance we are continuing to invest about 5% of GNP in capital projects that will enhance the productive capacity of the economy. Also the Finance Bill has a number of pro-enterprise measures including various improvements to the Research & Development tax scheme.

Now, in the light of the further deterioration in the economic and budgetary situation, the Government is continuing to identify measures to ensure the sustainability of the public finances, while also focusing on areas that can expand the productive capacity of the economy. This will enable the economy to be suitably positioned to exploit the global recovery when it emerges either late in 2009 or, as is now more likely, well into 2010.

Fiscal Policy.

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

28 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for Finance his views on a fiscal stimulus package to jump-start the Irish economy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45355/08]

Brian O'Shea

Question:

71 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Finance if he proposes measures to boost consumer spending to avoid the risk of a deflationary spiral; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45356/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 28 and 71 together.

In common with virtually all the world's advanced economies, Ireland is facing substantial economic and fiscal challenges in the immediate future. Ireland, however, is particularly badly affected and our scope to have a further fiscal stimulus on top of what we are already doing is extremely limited.

Our first priority must be to stabilise and to restore the public finances to good order by bringing our current budgetary position back to balance over the medium term. This we will do while continuing to commit substantial funding to public investment to secure the future growth potential of the economy and maintain employment and competitiveness. This will then underpin international confidence in Ireland as a place to work and invest.

Furthermore, we are maintaining public investment at about 5% of GNP which is equivalent to almost twice the EU average. This means that we are planning to borrow over €8 billion next year to continue to provide essential infrastructure such as roads, schools, public transport and water treatment projects. This investment represents a significant fiscal package and it supports employment in the short term and increases our productivity in the long term.

For a small, open economy such as ours, sustainable increases in living standards can only be achieved by supplying goods and services to the wider global economy. Therefore, we must also ensure the economy is in a position to take advantage of the global recovery when this emerges. Among other things, this will require a greater focus on competitiveness. To support our competitiveness objectives, the Government is committed to maintaining a low burden of taxation on capital and labour and has implemented a range of policies aimed at improving competition in product markets and flexibility in the labour market.

In addition, the recently published Finance Bill sets out a number of measures that are targeted at the enterprise and environment sectors, such as the R&D tax credit changes and the extension to the categories of technology qualifying under the accelerated capital allowances scheme for energy efficient equipment.

Public Service Contracts.

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

29 Deputy Pat Rabbitte asked the Minister for Finance the details of the new public procurement unit to be established in the Office of Public Works; the annual savings this unit is expected to make for the Exchequer; if this unit will be responsible for, or will oversee all procurement by Government Departments and agencies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45373/08]

It is proposed that the new public procurement unit to be based in the Office of Public Works will (i) oversee procurement on the part of central Government Departments and Offices, agencies and non-commercial State bodies so that they can acquire a range of goods and services more effectively, efficiently and with better value for money; (ii) provide professional procurement advice across the entire public service; (iii) develop targeted and accredited procurement training and education measures for the public service and (iv) further develop web-based e-tenders, including the use of eAuctions for certain goods and services where this would deliver better value for money.

It is intended that better public procurement practices will make a significant contribution to reducing Exchequer expenditure on goods and services and in this regard the Government will set targets on an annual basis for substantial savings on procurement resulting from the Unit's activities.

Tax Code.

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

30 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Finance if he will revisit the €10 and €2 exit tax to ensure that no airport has a comparative advantage over another due to Government policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39969/08]

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

40 Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he has held discussions with the Department of Finance on the operation of the new €10 air travel tax which will operate for airports here; the person who will collect the tax from departing passengers; if his Department undertook an analysis of the potential impact on volumes of airline passengers were a new airline tax to be introduced; the reason the owners of private jets with less than twenty seats will be exempt from the tax; if he will review the operation of the €10 air tax from Galway, Shannon, Ireland West, Cork and Kerry Airports in view of the higher tax that passengers from those airports will face when travelling to major UK destinations; if his attention has been drawn to the comments made by the chief executive officer of Galway Airport and of Ryanair regarding the impact on the aviation industry of the proposed new €10 air travel tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40065/08]

Olivia Mitchell

Question:

45 Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance his views on the impact of the €10 departure tax on the outcome of tourism policy here in view of the fact that it will increase the costs on tourists visiting; the discussions that he has had with the Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism and the Department of Transport on the impact of a departure tax in terms of the effect that it will have on the numbers of tourists that will visit here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41831/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 30, 40 and 45 together.

I announced in Budget 2009 that an air travel tax will come into force in respect of passengers departing from Irish airports on and from 30 March 2009. A general rate of €10 per passenger will apply, with a lower rate of €2 for shorter journeys.

The Finance Bill confirms the introduction of an air travel tax from 30 March 2009. However, I have taken account of concerns raised by the regional airports particularly those on the western seaboard. The lower rate of €2 will apply to departures from any Irish airport where the destination is 300kms or less from Dublin airport. This means that all Irish departures to locations such as Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow will be subject to the €2 rate. The airlines will be the liable persons for the tax, including paying it to Revenue.

Ireland is not unique in regard to applying a tax on air travel. A number of countries within the EU apply similar taxes including, the UK, France and the Netherlands, as do Australia and New Zealand. The proposed rates for the Irish air travel tax are not unreasonable both for shorter and longer journeys, when compared to rates in other countries.

Aircraft with less than 20 passenger seats are exempt from the air travel tax. This is a practical arrangement towards the operation of the tax. The cost of collecting the tax in respect of small aircraft would be high relative to the amounts of tax collected in respect of such aircraft. It also ensures that passengers travelling to and from the Irish islands are exempt from the tax, as the aircraft used on those services have less than 20 passenger seats. I would point out that the UK, France and the Netherlands all have arrangements in place that result in their air travel taxes effectively not applying to small aircraft.

It should be recognised that tourists will only be subject to the tax on their return journey. The additional €10 or €2 in the context of a much larger purchasing decision involving travel, hotel expenditures etc. shouldn't have much of an effect on tourist numbers. I appreciate the airline industry continues to go through a difficult period. However, this difficult trading period has, in addition to weak world economic activity, been largely driven by a massive spike in oil prices. Oil prices have now halved from the all-time high prices experienced earlier in the year.

I tried to be as fair as possible in looking at areas for additional tax revenues. It is also worth noting that fuel used by commercial airlines is completely exempt from tax, so it's a sector that already has considerable preferential treatment.

National Museum.

Olivia Mitchell

Question:

31 Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance if the funding for the new exhibition space at the National Museum at Collins Barracks is provided for in the 2009 capital budget; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41275/08]

Progress on this project is at an advanced stage and the Office of Public Works is currently preparing tender documents which should be finalised by April 2009. A decision to invite tenders and place a contract will then depend on the availability of funding.

Tax Collection.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

32 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the number of Irish people, and the amount of money, he believes have moved assets overseas through offshore trusts in each of the past five years to date in 2008; the number and the proportion of these people who declared income for tax in the appropriate year; when the Revenue Commissioners expect to be able to complete its investigation into the utilisation of such tax avoidance mechanisms using the new powers set out in the Finance (No.2) Bill 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45366/08]

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that investigations carried out under the various legacy enquiries revealed the use of offshore trusts in the settlement of funds by Irish residents on non-resident trustees. The existence of such trusts came to light in the probing and examination of financial records and transmission of funds in individual cases. These investigations highlighted the need for access to information to assist in the identification of persons who have settled assets and funds on offshore trusts.

The Finance (No 2) Bill 2008 provides for measures which would assist in this identification process in the five year period up to the date of the passing of the Finance Act and would also provide a flow of information in respect of the period post that date. In addition, the provision allows for an Authorised Officer to serve a notice requiring a person, whom the Authorised Officer has reason to believe has information relating to a settlement, to deliver such information as required under the notice.

Details of the overall number of Irish persons who have settled assets and funds on offshore trusts, and the related value of the settlements, in each of the five years to 2008 is not readily available. Accordingly, it is not possible at present to state the number of persons who have declared income from such sources for tax purposes.

In regard to settlements made in the five-year period to 2008 the Finance Bill itself provides for the delivery of information to Revenue within six months of the passing of the Act. As such, the receipt of information will be expected to commence in mid 2009. The Revenue investigation of cases involving offshore trusts will be concerned with establishing the identities of persons who have made settlements on the trusts and also investigating whether any additional liabilities to tax arise on the settled funds. These enquiries will involve an examination of the trust structures, the nature and character of the settled assets and funds and the manner of operation and control of the trust assets. The scope of the Revenue investigation of this sector will largely depend on the nature and extent of the information received in respect of the settlements and it is not possible at this stage to determine a likely completion date.

Departmental Expenditure.

Liz McManus

Question:

33 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Minister for Finance the provision for pay increases and increments that has been made in respect of public sector pay in Budget 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45351/08]

No specific provision has been made for the cost of the first phase (3.5%) of the new agreement: Towards 2016 — Review and Transitional Agreement 2008-09, scheduled for 1st September 2009. The cost arising would have to be found from within existing allocations. There is also a pay contingency amount of €40m provided for in 2009.

No additional provision has been made for increments for 2009. Year-on-year increases in allocations would not normally be granted for increments. In the normal way, the overall cost of increments for staff on incremental scales should be offset by reductions in cost arising from retirements or other movements by staff.

Question No. 34 answered with Question No. 16.

National Pensions Reserve Fund.

Michael D. Higgins

Question:

35 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for Finance the work of a person (details supplied) on the review of the National Pension Reserve Fund; the terms of reference for this review; if consideration is being given to the adoption by the fund of comprehensive principles or rules on ethical investing; if consideration is being given to modifying the investment criteria to encourage investment in domestic infrastructure or public private partnership projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45375/08]

I announced in my Budget speech that I was conducting a review of the National Pensions Reserve Fund in the context of recent economic and fiscal developments. I asked Mr Maurice O'Connell, former Governor of the Central Bank, to conduct the review. Mr O'Connell has now submitted his review to me and I am considering his conclusions.

As I stated in my Budget speech, any changes requiring legislation will be brought forward in due course.

Question No. 36 answered with Question No. 6.

Tax Code.

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

37 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Finance the strategy his Department has to implement the proposed parking levy; the areas which he considers are urban areas; if he plans to end renting car park spaces for public servants in his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40250/08]

The levy will apply where employers provide parking facilities for employees in the urban centres of Cork, Dublin, Galway, Limerick and Waterford. The specific areas to which the levy will apply and the date from which the levy will apply will be designated by me by way of Order. This will be done after appropriate consultation has been carried out. I can, however, confirm at this stage that, in accordance with the terms of the legislation, the levy will apply only to areas which are within the administrative areas of the five city councils. While the extent to which car parking is provided in association with Government offices varies, the number of spaces provided is always a fraction of the number of staff serving in the office and there are no immediate proposals to change policy in this regard.

State Borrowing.

Brian O'Shea

Question:

38 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Finance his views on the recent spike in the cost of credit default swaps on Irish sovereign debt; his further views on whether Ireland could lose its AAA sovereign rating at some point over the coming two years; his further views on the expected higher cost of State borrowing Ireland will face in 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45353/08]

The National Treasury Management Agency have advised me that the current aversion to risk in global markets has led to an increase in the cost of insuring exposure to all counterparties, and the associated increase in credit spreads has more to do with the general sentiment in the credit markets than the financial position of individual issuers. Irish government debt has not been immune to this trend. However, the market for Irish government credit default swaps is small and prices quoted are volatile. Also, it should be noted that such spreads represent a cost to the investor and do not directly affect the cost of debt to the Exchequer.

The interest rates at which the State can borrow are historically low. However, as a result of the increased borrowing requirement in 2008 and 2009, the interest element of the servicing of the national debt has been forecast in Budget 2009 to increase from €1,641 million in 2008 to €3,295 million in 2009. The 2009 estimate represents around 2% of GNP and this is in line with the average over the last 10 years.

Ireland has the top AAA rating from all the major rating agencies. In assessing overall credit worthiness, consideration has to be given to the overall level of government debt. The government debt ratio was forecast in Budget 2009 to be around 36% of GDP at end-2008. This ratio does not take into the account the assets of the National Pensions Reserve Fund or the significant cash balances that the NTMA has built up for the Exchequer. When the assets of the NPRF are netted off, the projected net indebtedness position for end-2008, as set out in Budget 2009, is in the region of 25% of GDP. The projected EU average for end 2008 is around 60% of GDP. However, given the continuous deterioration in the public finances, as evidenced in the end-November Exchequer returns, and the downside risks to growth next year, it is inevitable that our borrowing will rise in the years ahead. The Government is concerned at such a development and is giving priority to stabilising and restoring the public finances to a sustainable position, particularly by bringing the current budget back to balance as soon as possible.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Arthur Morgan

Question:

39 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Finance the meetings or correspondence he has had with a group (detail supplied) since the announcement of the Government's credit institution guarantee scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45325/08]

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

59 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Finance the meetings or correspondence he has had with a group (details supplied) since the announcement of the Government's credit institution guarantee scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45330/08]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

78 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Finance the meetings or correspondence he has had with a group (details supplied) since the announcement of the credit institutions (financial support) scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45326/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 39, 59 and 78 together.

The Government's Guarantee Scheme has been successful in safeguarding the stability of the Irish banking sector and in restoring its liquidity position. However, international capital market expectations in relation to capital levels in the banking sector have altered. In my statement on 28th November, I indicated that it would be appropriate for the State in certain circumstances, through the National Pensions Reserve Fund or otherwise, to consider supplementing private investment with State participation, consistent with the aim of securing the financial system. In that regard, the State is open to evaluating proposals from potential investors that would add value to the security and stability of the financial system and would enhance its ability to contribute in a positive way to economic development.

I have met in recent weeks with a number of banks and investment businesses. I have indicated that it is a matter for the Board of each financial institution concerned to develop further their own plans for raising capital where appropriate. The relevant institutions have agreed that they will work closely with potential investors and the Government to develop matters further.

Any parties with serious propositions for investment in an institution are of course referred to the institutions concerned. Any proposals involving State participation or investment would be considered only following advice from the NTMA and from financial and legal advisors as appropriate.

It would not be appropriate for me to comment on any specific proposals as the issue of their capitalisation is a matter for individual banks in the first instance, and the details are potentially market sensitive.

Question No. 40 answered with Question No. 30.
Question No. 41 answered with Question No. 11.

James Bannon

Question:

42 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Finance if he is satisfied that the charge made for the guarantee of bank deposits represents a commercial charge. [45140/08]

The Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Scheme provides that each covered institution shall pay a charge to the Exchequer for the guarantee provided under the Scheme.

The charge for the provision of the guarantee is structured to cover the Government funding cost, which is regarded as the closest measure possible to what could be considered an appropriate price in the current financial environment. It is estimated that the total aggregate charge paid by the covered institutions over the next two years will amount to approximately one billion euros. Each institution will pay its portion of the charge having regard to factors such as the amount of covered liabilities, its risk profile and the steps it is taking to reduce that risk consistent with the overall objectives of the Scheme.

The intention in framing the charge was to protect the taxpayer's interest, while not imposing such charges as would add to the problems we are seeking to solve. At the same time, it was our intention that financial markets would continue to function normally and that no unfair competitive advantage would be given to the covered institutions.

While it may be possible in theory to make an estimate of a commercial or market value for the guarantee, any such estimate would have to make a number of fundamental assumptions. In practice there is no real market price for such a guarantee as provided under the Scheme and it is doubtful if any quasi-market price estimate could reliably be made.

Economic Competitiveness.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

43 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which Irish enterprises and lending institutions have utilised EU funding for small and medium enterprises through the competitiveness and innovation framework programme and joint European resources for micro-to-medium enterprises; the extent to which he and his Department have encouraged financial institutions to provide European investment fund guaranteed loan finance to small businesses in the period from May 2007 to date in 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45359/08]

In relation to the general question of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) being able to access finance, I am very conscious of the difficulties that are being faced by Irish businesses in this regard. At my meetings with certain financial institutions over the last two weeks, I asked those institutions covered by the Government's guarantee scheme to consider the contribution that they can make to the economy through appropriate credit initiatives in relation to small and medium sized businesses and otherwise. I, therefore, welcome the fact that certain institutions have announced initiatives in this regard.

The Deputy may be aware that I recently met the Vice-President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) who has responsibility for the Bank's activities in Ireland. The EIB recently announced that it was providing additional funding through its lending facility for SMEs in the European Union. The Vice-President confirmed that the Bank has been in discussions with a number of Irish financial institutions about participating in this facility for SMEs and that the EIB hopes that agreements to provide such loan facilities can be finalised as soon as possible. I have urged Irish banks to utilise the facility to the maximum extent possible with a view to making the additional funding available to SMEs as soon as possible. It is, therefore, good to note that a number of banks have announced their intention to do so.

Additionally, with my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Ms Mary Coughlan, TD, I have been in regular contact with the banks regarding the flow of lending to small business.

I am also informed by the Tánaiste, that the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) contains a financial instrument, the SME Guarantee Facility, that aims to improve the financial environment for SMEs by facilitating their access to debt and equity finance and that the SME Guarantee Facility is operated by the European Investment Fund (EIF) on behalf of the European Commission. I would urge financial intermediaries to make contact directly with the EIF concerning participation in the facility and I am informed that some have done so in the past.

In response to a recommendation of the Small Business Forum in relation to the above loan guarantee facility, I understand that the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment provided information to the Irish Bankers' Federation on the proposal in December 2006, including the operation and scope of the arrangement. I also understand that the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has made itself, and continues to make itself, available to any bank interested in pursuing the possibility of securing funding under the SME Guarantee, with a view to facilitating their contact with relevant officials in the EIF and the European Commission, as appropriate, for further advice and assistance.

I understand that proposals from financial intermediaries will be examined by the EIF on a continuous basis, within the constraints of the available Community budget allocations. Irish financial intermediaries will, therefore, continue to have an opportunity to participate in the facility. I am informed that the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment will continue to encourage participation and will remain available to financial intermediaries wishing to access the facility. Participation in the facility is, of course, a commercial decision for any financial intermediary concerned.

In addition, I am informed that the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, in response to a recommendation of the Small Business Forum, is currently researching the possibility of the financial institutions accessing loan guarantees from the European Investment Fund that would enable them to expand their lending to small enterprises.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Kathleen Lynch

Question:

44 Deputy Kathleen Lynch asked the Minister for Finance the extent to which small businesses and personal borrowers are having difficulties in accessing the credit they need; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45346/08]

An important aim of the Bank Guarantee Scheme is to ensure that we have a banking system that as a whole works effectively, efficiently and competitively in facilitating all the day-to-day ordinary economic transactions of commercial, business, family and social life. At a round of meetings with the banks covered by the guarantee scheme on 28 November I asked them to come back to me with proposals regarding the extension of credit to SMEs, thus helping to ensure that the banking sector serves the needs of the Irish economy. I welcome the fact that many of these institutions have already announced funding schemes aimed at meeting the funding needs of the SME sector.

I will continue to keep this most important area of economic activity under review. The bank guarantee scheme includes strict terms and conditions on covered institutions to ensure that the public interest, which includes the general consumer and small business sector, is protected. By putting guarantees in place we have removed a major obstacle to financial institutions continuing to play their proper role in facilitating enterprises and individuals with credit where it is sought on the basis of a sound business proposition.

The extent of lending to the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector is dependant on demand by businesses as well as on the supply of lending by the banks. My colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Ms. Mary Coughlan, T.D., has asked Enterprise Ireland to carry out a survey examining the effects of the current credit situation on lending to the SME sector. While this survey is as yet incomplete, initial indications are that while there has been a reduction in lending, most of companies approaching the banks have received some or all of the finance requested, albeit with greater restrictions in place.

Finally, I would also point out that the European Investment Bank (EIB) recently announced that it was increasing its support for Europe's SMEs to help mitigate the effects of the current credit crisis. I understand that the EIB has had discussions with a number of Irish banks about participation in the facility.

Question No. 45 answered with Question No. 30.

Decentralisation Programme.

Joan Burton

Question:

46 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the savings he anticipates making in expenditure on property, rents and leases arising from the suspension of parts of the decentralisation programme; the leases or purchases of properties that are now redundant to requirements following his decision to suspend these elements of the programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45344/08]

As announced in the Budget, the Government has reviewed the Decentralisation Programme in light of the changed economic circumstances and identified priority elements on which implementation should now proceed. The Government's decision will result in the relocation of up to 6,000 posts to over 40 locations outside of Dublin. This is made up of 2,600 posts already moved, together with an additional 3,400 posts that are in train. Decisions on the timing of further work on implementation of the balance of the programme are being deferred pending a review in 2011 in light of budgetary developments.

Having regard to the fact that the decision by Government is to defer, and not to cancel, elements of the programme pending a review in 2011, it is not possible, in advance of that review, to say what, if any, savings will be achieved as a result of the review. The total amount of expenditure to date in relation to the property aspects of the programme is approximately €270m. This includes the cost of site/property acquisitions, fit-out works and rent paid to date. These costs have been offset by property disposals in Dublin.

Sites have been acquired in the following locations where the programme has been deferred: Cavan, Dungarvan, Edenderry, Thomastown, Thurles and Waterford. The total cost incurred in their acquisition was €17.5m.

Public Private Partnerships.

Jack Wall

Question:

47 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Finance the implications for public private partnership projects of the current economic difficulties; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45362/08]

The general tightening of credit markets has implications for all privately funded projects, including PPPs. These include an increase in the cost of private finance, changes to the terms and conditions of finance deals and a reduction in the number of lenders in the infrastructure market. These challenges have to date required more detailed contract negotiation. It is still too early to assess whether more strategic changes may be required. It should be noted that in the longer term, PPPs are likely to remain relatively attractive investment targets for financial institutions because of their national dimension and Exchequer-funded unitary payments.

The situation is slightly different in relation to the PPP housing regeneration projects that have been the subject of media attention recently. These projects are based on a Design, Build and Finance model and are closely linked to the value of private housing output obtained by the developer. The market for private housing has substantially changed in the past 12-18 months which has made it much more difficult in the current economic climate to advance this model. Nonetheless, there are a number of options that can be developed to make such projects viable again and these are currently being examined by Dublin City Council.

The overriding principle to be followed in assessing whether a specific project is suitable for procurement as a PPP remains value for money. PPP has demonstrated that it has a role to play, along with other procurement options, in delivering investment in our economic and social infrastructure. The Government remains committed to the use of PPPs in appropriate circumstances as an option in delivering certain public investment projects.

Tax Code.

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

48 Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on discussions held with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government on the proposed new annual €200 tax for urban-based employees; if he will define an urban area for the purpose of this tax; if he will introduce any exemptions or partial exemptions to this tax on urban workers who may be shift or part time workers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39835/08]

I am presuming the Deputy is referring to the parking levy. The specific areas to which the levy will apply will be designated by me by way of Order. This will be done after appropriate consultation has been carried out. I can, however, confirm at this stage that, in accordance with the terms of the legislation, the levy will apply only to areas which are within the administrative areas of the five city councils in Cork, Dublin, Galway, Limerick and Waterford.

Where parking spaces are shared by employees, the levy is reduced to €100 where the ratio of the number of employees to the number of parking spaces is two to one or more. Reductions in the levy are also provided for to take account of atypical work patterns, such as part-time or shift working. The levy will not apply to disabled drivers. I would also point out that occasional permission to park, for not more than ten days in a year, is excluded, as is occasional use of a space by a retired person.

Departmental Agencies.

Brian Hayes

Question:

49 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Finance the non-commercial State bodies for which performance-related bonuses have been approved by his Department; if a pool of 10% pay applies in these schemes; and if the full pool has been taken up since the schemes commenced. [45164/08]

In terms of the operation of performance related award (PRA) schemes in non commercial State Bodies, the role of the Minister and Department of Finance is to approve the introduction of such schemes where the relevant Board and parent Department are of the view that the remit of the State body in question is such as can meet the principles laid down by the Review Body on Higher Remuneration in the Public Sector for the effective application and operation of such schemes.

A list of schemes currently in operation in Non Commercial State Bodies is shown in the following table.

Most of the schemes listed apply to the post of CEO or equivalent only. In this context a "pool" does not apply — rather access to such a scheme forms part of the relevant employment contract and generally provides for awards up to a maximum of 20% of salary. In a total of five organisations, schemes have been approved for 2nd level management. While individual awards in these 2nd level schemes may be up to 20%, the pool for performance-related awards for relevant staff will be 10% of the pay bill for those covered by the Scheme.

I have no role in the subsequent determination of individual awards made under such schemes. Individual awards made in non commercial state sponsored bodies are a matter for consideration and determination by the Boards of the relevant bodies themselves and are subject to monitoring by relevant parent departments.

Parent Department

Name of Body

Communications Energy & Natural Resources

1

National Oil Reserve Agency

2

Sustainable Energy Ireland

3

Broadcasting Commission of Ireland

4

Digital Media Development

Enterprise, Trade and Employment

5

Enterprise Ireland*

6

FÁS

7

Forfás*

8

Health and Safety Authority

9

Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority (IASSA)

10

IDA *

11

National Consumer Agency

12

National Standards Authority of Ireland (NSAI)

13

Personal Injuries Assessment Board

14

Science Foundation Ireland

Health and Children

15

Food Safety Authority of Ireland

16

Mental Health Commission

17

Irish Medicines Board

18

Adoption Board

Justice, Equality and Law Reform

19

Courts Service

20

Equality Authority

21

Human Rights Commission

22

Irish Prison Service

23

Land Registry and Registry of Deeds

24

Legal Aid Board

Social and Family Affairs

25

Combat Poverty Agency

26

Comhairle

27

Family Support Agency

28

The Pensions Board

Transport

29

Road Safety Authority (was Driver Testing Standards Authority)

30

National Roads Authority

Arts, Sport and Tourism

31

Fáilte Ireland*

32

Irish Sports Council

33

National Concert Hall

Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

34

Teagasc

35

Bord Bia

36

Irish Marine Institute

37

Bord Iascaigh Mhara

Environment, Heritage and Local Government

38

Heritage Council

39

Local Government Management Service Board*

* PRA schemes in place for 2nd level.

Tax Code.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

50 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Finance his views on allowing tax relief at the marginal rate, or other appropriate financial supports, on charges for IVF treatment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45368/08]

The position is that health expenses relief will be granted at the standard rate only in respect of expenses incurred from 1 January 2009 with the exception of nursing home expenses which will continue to be granted at the marginal rate.

Issues relating to financial support for health care are a matter in the first instance for the Minister for Health and Children.

Departmental Staff.

Seán Barrett

Question:

51 Deputy Seán Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the number and percentage of disabled persons employed by the Office of Public Works, as compared with the requirement of 3% disabled staff to be employed by State bodies; the reason for this situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45073/08]

The Office of Public Works (OPW) is staffed by both Civil Servants and Non-Established State Industrial Employees.

The OPW conducted a census of its Civil Servant employees in early 2008 for the year ending 2007 seeking voluntary disclosure of disabilities in accordance with the definition provided in the Disability Act, 2005. There is no statutory obligation on an employee to declare that they have a disability. The census was conducted for the purpose of reporting on the 3% compliance target for the employment of persons with disabilities under the Disability Act, 2005. The returns received indicated that a total of 25 people had self-declared a disability representing 3.4% of the total number of Civil Servants employed in OPW.

The census did not extend to the Non-Established State Industrial Employees. Accordingly, there are currently no up to date figures available for the number of non-established state industrial employees who have a disability.

Tax Code.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

52 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Finance if he has assessed the expected impact of the 0.5% VAT increase on consumer spending and VAT revenue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45331/08]

The Budget introduced a general package of revenue-raising measures to fund key public services, one measure of which was increasing the standard VAT rate by 0.5% to 21.5% from 1 December 2008. The VAT increase is estimated to yield the Exchequer €208 million in 2009 and €227 million in a full year.

With regard to assessing the impact of the VAT increase in consumer spending, consumer price inflation is easing, which will help real disposable income. Accordingly, it is not anticipated that there will be any considerable negative impact from the increase in VAT on consumer spending.

Already we are borrowing over 10% of all day to day spending on public services (before capital spending). This is unsustainable and we faced difficult choices in bringing forward corrective measures. The estimated €227m that will accrue in a full year from the VAT increase will go some way towards funding necessary public services.

Some of the goods and services that will be affected by the increase in the standard rate are alcohol, cigarettes, cars, petrol, electrical equipment, furniture, telecommunications, cosmetics, confectionery, soft drinks and adult clothing and footwear. The effect of the 0.5% increase in the standard rate is that the price of goods and services, which apply at this rate, will increase by 0.41%. This equates to an increase of 8 cent on a good costing €20, or 41 cent on a good costing €100.

It must be also be recognised that around half the value of goods and services purchased in the State are not subject to the standard rate of VAT and therefore are unaffected by the change in the standard rate. All Government services, local authorities, hospitals and schools etc., are exempt from VAT. The zero rate of VAT applies to the majority of foodstuffs, oral medicines, books and children's clothes and shoes. In addition, housing, electricity, gas, domestic fuels, restaurant services, and labour intensive services such as hairdressing and shoe repair, are applicable at the 13.5% reduced rate of VAT.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

53 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance his views on the establishment of a fund to lend directly to small and medium enterprises, ensuring that they can access credit and working capital; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45357/08]

Lending by banks is, in the first instance, a commercial decision for individual financial institutions who will evaluate loan applications submitted by small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Through the introduction of the Bank Guarantee Scheme the Government have sought to maintain an environment where the financial markets can continue to function normally and banks can continue to support economic activity through their lending policies.

At a round of meetings with the banks covered by the guarantee scheme on 28 November I asked them to come back to me with proposals regarding the extension of credit to SMEs, thus helping to ensure that the banking sector serves the needs of the Irish economy. I welcome the fact that many of these institutions have already announced funding schemes aimed at meeting the needs of the SME sector and I will keep this important area of economic activity under review.

The Deputy will be aware that in my Budget speech on 14 October, I announced tax relief measures which will assist the SME sector by way of remission in Corporation Tax and Capital Gains Tax in the first three years for start-up companies. These measures will help to grow small business and promote an entrepreneurial culture.

My colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Ms Mary Coughlan, TD, has responsibility for enterprise development, including supports for SMEs. Support for indigenous companies arises through maintaining a positive business environment and through particular interventions from the State development agencies such as Enterprise Ireland, FÁS and the County and City Enterprise Boards. The significant allocations in the 2009 Estimates to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and to its development agencies will provide for the continued support of the SME sector.

I would also point out that the European Investment Bank (EIB) recently announced that it was increasing its support for Europe's SMEs to help mitigate the effects of the current credit crisis. I understand that the EIB has had discussions with a number of Irish banks about participation in the facility.

Question No. 54 answered with Question No. 27.

Public Service Review.

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

55 Deputy Pat Rabbitte asked the Minister for Finance the precise terms of reference and membership of the special group on public service numbers and expenditure programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45374/08]

I refer the Deputy to the Government Statement on Transforming Public Services of 26 November 2008 which stated that the objectives of the Special Group are to: review the scope for reducing or discontinuing Expenditure Programmes with a view to eliminating the current budget deficit by 2011; to this end, analyse and make recommendations on reducing the numbers employed in each area of the Public Service having regard to: the need to identify and prioritise particular output targets and areas, the achievement of greater efficiency and economy in the delivery of all services, the scope for rationalising and streamlining delivery of public services in the consumers' interest; make recommendations on reallocation of staffing or expenditure resources between public service organisations as appropriate to deliver the objectives set out in the Programme for Government; examine and make recommendations for further rationalisation of State agencies beyond the rationalisation proposals and principles set out in Budget 2009.

As I elaborated in my comments at that time, the Special Group's examination of all programmes funded through public expenditure will identify options for savings in the context of the Government's fiscal objectives as set out in Budget 2009. It will also ensure that public expenditure is being used to address relevant priority policy objectives in the current fiscal environment and the overall efficiency of the public service will also be examined, including any ways of doing business that are out of step with the needs of a modern, responsive public service.

The Group consists of Mr. Colm McCarthy (Chair) and Mr. Donal McNally as core Members and they will be assisted by Mr. Pat McLoughlin, Mr. Maurice O'Connell, Mr. William Slattery and Ms. Mary Walsh. It will establish its own working methodology and any vacancy arising in the Group will be filled by me.

The Group will report to me every two months and will submit a final report to me by the end of June 2009.

Sports Facilities.

Lucinda Creighton

Question:

56 Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Finance the action that will be taken to provide sporting facilities such as football pitches for residents of an area (details supplied) in view of the fact that they are being prevented from using the gardens themselves; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41315/08]

The Iveagh Gardens were laid out as exhibition gardens during the 19th century, with many unusual and unique garden features such as the Maze, Rosarium, Cascade, the Grottoes and the sunken Archery Grounds. On account of its designation as a National Historic Garden, its small size, and the fact that its features are designed primarily for passive recreation, it is not proposed to facilitate any active sporting activities in the Iveagh Gardens.

Tax Code.

Mary Upton

Question:

57 Deputy Mary Upton asked the Minister for Finance his plans to heed the recent ruling in the EU Court of Justice which stated that services to sports clubs can be VAT exempt under certain conditions; his further plans to transpose this information into Irish law; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41124/08]

It is assumed that the Deputy is referring to the Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-253/07 — Canterbury Hockey Club and Canterbury Ladies Hockey Club v The Commissioners for H.M. Revenue and Customs. In that case the European Court of Justice considered the scope of the exemption from VAT provided by Article 13A(1)(m) of the EU Sixth VAT Directive, now Article 132(1)(m) of the EU VAT Directive 2006. That provision provides for exemption from VAT for certain services closely linked to sport or physical education supplied by non-profit making organisations to persons taking part in sport or physical education.

The European Court of Justice ruled that the provision is to be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of persons taking part in sport, it includes services supplied to corporate persons and to unincorporated associations, provided that those services are closely linked and essential to sport, that they are supplied by non-profit-making organisations and that their true beneficiaries are persons taking part in sport. The Court also ruled that Member States are not permitted to limit the exemption under that provision by reference to the recipients of the services in question.

I am further advised by the Revenue Commissioners that Irish VAT law and practice in this area is already fully in conformity with the decision in the case and the services concerned are exempt from VAT in Ireland.

Economic Forecasts.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

58 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance if, based on the most recent data available to him, he is satisfied that he can accurately predict the likely trend in the economy in view of the current or projected position in respect of the economic fundamentals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45295/08]

At the current juncture, there is greater uncertainty than normal attached to any set of forecasts, given the scale of the shocks to which the global and domestic economies have been subjected to. In this context, the Stability Programme Update, published alongside the Budget, highlighted that the Budget day economic forecasts were more uncertain than normal, with risks to the outlook firmly on the downside.

The further deterioration in tax receipts in 2008, as seen by the end-November Exchequer Returns, the continuing weakening of consumer and investor confidence, adverse currency movements, continued difficulty in the international financial markets and depressed economic conditions, are all evidence of those risks materialising.

As I have already said today, all indications are that economic activity in 2009 will contract by significantly more than the forecast in Budget 2009 with an overall contraction of perhaps somewhere in the region of 3 to 4 per cent.

Upon receipt of the end-year fiscal data and the latest economic data, including the third quarter national income data, a revised economic and fiscal assessment will be prepared by my Department in early January and brought forward for Government consideration. This assessment will reflect the dramatically changed environment now being faced. We are living in a time of unprecedented economic difficulties, and the changed circumstances that have occurred in a short period of time must be addressed.

Finally, as I have said previously, short-term economic forecasting is not an exact science, given the many moving parts which make up an economy. This is well evidenced by the revisions that most international forecasters have had to make to their recently published forecasts.

Question No. 59 answered with Question No. 39.

Tax Code.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

60 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Finance if, in view of the EU Commission’s veto of tax incentives for docklands regeneration as announced in Budget 2009, he will bring forward revised proposals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45350/08]

In my Budget speech on 14 October, I announced the introduction of a new tax incentive scheme to facilitate the removal and relocation of Seveso-listed industrial facilities which hinder the residential and commercial regeneration of Docklands in urban areas. The EU Seveso Directive seeks to protect public safety by placing land-use restrictions on new residential and commercial development near locations where potentially dangerous activities are undertaken. The Deputy will also be aware that I indicated in my speech that this scheme will be subject to clearance by the European Commission from a State Aids perspective.

Although there have been some initial discussions on this matter with the EU Commission, those discussions were undertaken by officials from Departments represented on the Cork Docklands Development Forum and raised matters relating to the work of that Body on the regeneration of the Cork docklands. In relation to the incentive announced in my Budget speech and detailed in the Finance Bill, there have not been any discussions with the EU Commission either in advance of, or after, my Budget announcement and publication in the Finance Bill of the draft legislation.

During the discussions undertaken in the context of the Cork Docklands Development Forum, the EU Commission indicated that the use of tax incentives to facilitate the remediation of sites vacated by Seveso-type industrial facilities for any future residential and commercial use will not pass the EU State Aid rules because of the ‘polluter pays principle'. This ensures that an industry which creates a pollution incident (or in this case, which undertakes the land-use that has damaged a particular location) must bear the cost of remediating the property back to a pre-pollution/pre-damage, land-use basis. As a result, the remediation of lands occupied by Seveso-type industrial facilities is not covered by the incentive contained in the Finance Bill and it is not appropriate to develop any other tax-based incentives to address this matter.

It should be noted however, that any company engaged in Seveso-type industrial facilities which remediates lands occupied by those facilities during the course of developing those lands for sale is allowed deduct the costs of this remediation against their taxation in the normal manner attributable to business-related costs.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

61 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance the outcome of his recent discussions in Farmleigh with Irish banking executives, public servants, Irish and international investors; the individuals involved in these discussions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45370/08]

The Government's Guarantee Scheme has been successful in safeguarding the stability of the Irish banking sector and in restoring its liquidity position. To ensure the effective implementation of the Scheme, and to ensure that covered institutions are meeting their obligations under the Scheme, my officials and I are in regular contact with the covered institutions. In addition, the Central Bank and Financial Regulator are consulted on the implementation of the Scheme on an ongoing basis.

I have met with the CEO and Chairpersons of the covered institutions and asked them to examine their options to attract or raise private capital to underpin their long term sustainability and support their lending to the economy. These discussions have been productive and informative. I have also met with a number of investment businesses in recent weeks. Parties with serious propositions for investment in an institution are of course referred to the institutions concerned.

In certain circumstances it would be appropriate for the State, through the National Pensions Reserve Fund or otherwise, to consider supplementing private investment with State participation, where in doing so the aim of securing the financial system can be better met. The relevant institutions have agreed that they will work closely with potential investors and the Government to develop matters further.

As part of monitoring ongoing compliance with the terms of the Bank Guarantee Scheme, and in assessing proposals to raise capital levels in the covered institutions, I have consulted with my legal and financial advisors as well as other interested stakeholders as appropriate. It would not be prudent for me to elaborate further on these market sensitive discussions.

National Pensions Reserve Fund.

Michael D. Higgins

Question:

62 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for Finance the holding of the National Pension Reserve Fund; if they are held directly or through funds, in banks quoted on the Irish Stock Exchange and banks quoted on international stock exchanges; if he will set out a table of these holdings on 30 September 2007, 31 December 2007, and 30 September 2008; the acquisition cost of each investment; the market value of each investment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45376/08]

The National Pensions Reserve Fund, as a large diversified global investor, has invested in over 2,500 stocks globally. As required by the National Pensions Reserve Fund Act 2000, the National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission publishes a detailed list of the assets of the Fund at end-year, including its holdings in banking stocks. The Report, which is available on the Fund's website www.nprf.ie, also includes the market valuation of each investment at end-year. Holdings of equities and debt securities of banks represented some 11.4% of the Fund at 31 December 2007. The Commission does not publish details of its investments at end-quarters.

Shares in individual companies are acquired at a variety of prices as and when the Fund invests the Exchequer contributions received on a quarterly basis each year. More generally, it is worth making the point that the return on an investment portfolio should be assessed on the basis of the overall return, not by reference to an individual investment or class of investments.

Tax Code.

David Stanton

Question:

63 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Finance the number of people availing of the rent-a-room tax relief; the cost to the State of this relief in 2006, 2007 and 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45322/08]

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the most recent year for which the necessary detailed statistical information is available in relation to the Rent-a-Room Scheme is the income tax year 2005. In that year, an estimated 2,820 claimants availed of the tax exemption at an estimated cost to the Exchequer of €3.3 million.

Flood Relief.

David Stanton

Question:

64 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Finance the plans of the Office of Public Works in relation to carrying out works on the weir in Fermoy, County Cork; the progress made in resolving certain issues in relation to the rowing club in the town; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45323/08]

The Office of Public Works has agreed in principle to a request from the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, to facilitate the construction of a rock ramp fish pass at Fermoy Weir in the course of the execution of the proposed Flood Relief Scheme Works. This agreement is subject to the proviso that the proposal is agreed with Fermoy Town Council, and that its inclusion will not delay the progress of the Flood Relief Scheme.

In facilitating construction of the fish pass, OPW would be acting as agent for the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources and Fermoy Town Council, which it is understood is the owner of the weir and which will be required to maintain the works.

Design of the rock ramp fish pass and consultation with the Town Council and other stakeholders is being undertaken by the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources.

I am aware that Fermoy Rowing Club has expressed reservations about the impact of the proposed fish pass on its activities and that the matter is also of concern to the Town Council and to inhabitants of the town. The Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources has responsibility for dealing with these issues, but the Office of Public Works is happy to assist the Department with a view to seeing them resolved.

The Office of Public Works expects to invite tenders for the Flood Relief Scheme within the next week.

Departmental Expenditure.

Jimmy Deenihan

Question:

65 Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Finance when the contracts for the building of the new Department of Defence headquarters were signed; the cost commitments entered into with the contract; if the signing of the contract was reconsidered in view of the budgetary problems being experienced; if the costs allocated to the building and equipping of the building are being reviewed in view of the declining budgetary situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42924/08]

On 21 May 2008, following a competitive tendering process, the Office of Public Works awarded a Fixed Price Contract to P. Elliott & Co. Ltd. in the sum of €24,894,842, including VAT, to construct a new Headquarters for the Department of Defence at Station Road, Newbridge, Co. Kildare. Work on site is well underway and is expected to be completed by the end of 2009.

This contract does not include for fitting out the canteen. Tenders for this aspect will be invited in due course.

The provision of equipment such as IT, telephones, etc., will be a matter for the Department of Defence when the building is ready for occupation. A separate contract is in place for supply of furniture.

Banking Sector Regulation.

Joe Costello

Question:

66 Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Finance his views on the high level of credit card debt held by consumers here; if consideration has been given to increasing the minimum payment on credit card balances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45377/08]

I have no role in relation to payment terms for commercial debt (including credit card debt) which, for the generality is a matter, for the parties concerned.

While the overall level of debt on credit cards has been rising, the pace at which it has been growing has declined significantly. From a high of almost 20% year on year growth in March 2007, the equivalent data for outstanding indebtedness on credit cards in October 2008 was an increase of less than 9%. Credit card debt represents less than 2% of personal sector credit overall. In addition, credit card data refers to debt outstanding on all credit cards at end-month and includes balances that subsequently may be paid in full at the payment due date. The increase in the number of credit cards issued and the amount of debt outstanding is in line with a general trend of increased market penetration in the EU and a move towards electronic retail payment methods.

A survey, conducted by the Financial Regulator, indicated in March 2007 that 55% pay their balance in full each month, thus incurring no interest. Unfortunately, a small minority of borrowers develop credit card debt problems. Anyone experiencing difficulty in repaying such a debt should discuss the matter with the credit card provider and seek appropriate advice without delay. The Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS), which falls under the remit of my colleague, the Minister for Social and Family Affairs, is a national, free, confidential and independent service for people in debt, or in danger of getting into debt. MABS offices, throughout the country, work with people in order to assist them with their financial planning and budgeting for the future.

As Minister for Finance, I have consistently highlighted the need for responsible behaviour by both borrowers and lenders and, in particular, the need to factor into their financial decision making the effects of potential future changes in economic and financial conditions.

All credit card providers must comply with the Financial Regulator's Consumer Protection Code, which states that financial services providers must act in the customers' best interests and only provide financial products that are suitable for the consumer. In addition, the Code specifies that when a credit institution is announcing a change in its interest rates, it must state clearly the effective date of the new rate in its notification. The credit institution must also update the interest rate details on its information services as soon as the change comes into effect. Furthermore a consumer's credit card limit may only be increased following a request from the consumer.

The Financial Regulator spends significant time and resources informing consumers about the potential risks of availing of credit card credit. Its publications, including its credit card cost surveys, are designed to help consumers choose the card that best suits their needs. In addition, its help-line and website provide details to help those who have problems with credit card debt. In particular, its publication "Managing your Money" is aimed at helping consumers to plan for the future, control spending and avoid debt problems.

The Financial Regulator's Consumer Director regularly highlights the issues of credit card debt in the television and radio interviews, the key messages for consumers being: Use your credit card for short-term credit but failure to pay your bill in full every month can mean that debt can build up quickly. Shop around, using the online credit card cost comparisons, to see if you can get a card with a lower interest rate or a no-interest introductory special offer. Don't just make the minimum payment — it will not be enough to reduce your balance in a reasonable time and you will end up paying a lot of money in the long-term. If you cannot pay your bill in full, pay off as much as you can afford to, don't miss any repayments and don't use your card again until the balance is paid off.

The Financial Regulator has also carried out a review of the transparency of the information contained on credit card statements and will be consulting on this as part of the Review of the Consumer Protection Code due to begin in 2009.

Finally, the Irish Banking Federation (IBF) and its members do not recommend credit cards as a tool for longer-term borrowing. The credit card is a beneficial payment instrument — offering credit, flexibility and safety — when used responsibly. It is not suitable for long-term credit — there are other more suitable forms available such as personal loans.

Pension Provisions.

Arthur Morgan

Question:

67 Deputy Arthur Morgan asked the Minister for Finance the meetings or correspondence he has had with the Irish Pension Board since 1 January 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45324/08]

Under the Pensions Act 1990 the Pensions Board reports to the Minister for Social and Family Affairs — rather than the Minister for Finance — on all matters relating to the functions assigned to the Board under that Act and on matters relating to pensions generally. I have not met with the Pensions Board but my Department has regular contact with the Executive of the Board on a range of pensions and related matters.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Kieran O'Donnell

Question:

68 Deputy Kieran O’Donnell asked the Minister for Finance the measures he proposes to ensure that the recapitalisation of the banks will ensure that credit is provided to businesses and consumers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45382/08]

As outlined in my statement of 28 November, I have asked the covered banks to examine their options to attract or raise private capital to underpin their long term sustainability and support their lending to the economy. I am not promoting or supporting any particular proposal nor would it be appropriate for me to do so. I have however asked all the covered institutions to engage actively with all credible proposals and of course I am prepared to explore proposals for what Government participation or involvement may accompany the private investment.

Further, I have also asked these Institutions to consider the contribution that they can make to the economy through appropriate credit initiatives in relation to small and medium sized businesses and otherwise. On foot of this request several Institutions have announced comprehensive SME support packages.

The Deputy may also wish to be aware that I recently met Mr Plutarchos Sakellaris, Vice-President of the European Investment Bank, which recently announced that it was providing additional funding through its lending facility for SMEs in the European Union. Mr Sakellaris confirmed that the Bank has been in discussion with a number of Irish financial institutions about participating in this facility for SMEs and that the EIB hopes that agreements to provide such loan facilities can be finalised as soon as possible. I have urged Irish banks to utilise the facility to the maximum extent possible with a view to making the additional funding available to SMEs as soon as possible. It is therefore pleasing to note that a number of banks have announced their intention to do so.

Question No. 69 answered with Question No. 27.

Tax Code.

Denis Naughten

Question:

70 Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance his plans to review the capital gains tax regime; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45071/08]

As the Deputy may be aware, I have made a number of changes to the capital gains tax code in my recent Budget and Finance Bill (as initiated). These include changes to the payment dates in respect of disposals made on or after 14 October 2008 and also an increase in the rate of capital gains tax from 20% to 22%.

I have no plans at this time to make further changes to the capital gains tax code.

Question No. 71 answered with Question No. 28.

Live Register.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

72 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Finance his views on recent trends in live register figures and the latest quarterly household employment survey; if he will revise his forecast of average unemployment for 2009, from the 7.3% forecast on Budget 2009 day; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45360/08]

The latest Live Register figures relate to November 2008, when the number of people on the Register reached 277,200 on a seasonally-adjusted basis. This represents an annual increase of 106,800. This corresponds to a standardised unemployment rate of 7.8%. Both the scale and the speed of the deterioration point to the continued difficult economic conditions pertaining.

The latest Quarterly National Household Survey data relate to the third quarter of this year. These data show that employment declined at an annual rate of 1.2% in the third quarter, the first decline in employment since the early 1990s. Unemployment on a QNHS basis rose to 6.3% in the third quarter, once adjustment is made for seasonal factors.

The Budget day forecast for unemployment to average 7.3% next year was based on the assumption that while employment would decline, there would be some easing in the growth of labour supply, brought about by lower participation rates and lower rates of migration. However, as I have already said in response to an earlier question, my Department is in the light of the recent negative information revising downwards its macroeconomic forecasts. While that assessment is not finalised yet, I expect that the Department's view of the labour market will reflect the worsening economic position now emerging.

Public Service Review.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

73 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Finance the terms of reference of the special group on public service numbers and expenditure programmes, chaired by Mr. Colm McCarthy; if these terms of reference include a review of all proposed current and capital expenditure for 2009 and beyond; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45349/08]

I refer the Deputy to the Government Statement on Transforming Public Services of 26 November 2008 which stated that the objectives of the Special Group are to:—

a. Review the scope for reducing or discontinuing Expenditure Programmes with a view to eliminating the current budget deficit by 2011.

b. To this end, analyse and make recommendations on reducing the numbers employed in each area of the Public Service having regard to:—

i. the need to identify and prioritise particular output targets and areas;

ii. the achievement of greater efficiency and economy in the delivery of all services;

iii. the scope for rationalising and streamlining delivery of public services in the consumers' interest.

c. Make recommendations on reallocation of staffing or expenditure resources between public service organisations as appropriate to deliver the objectives set out in the Programme for Government.

d. Examine and make recommendations for further rationalisation of State agencies beyond the rationalisation proposals and principles set out in Budget 2009.

As I elaborated in my comments at that time, the Special Group's examination of all programmes funded through public expenditure will identify options for savings in the context of the Government's fiscal objectives as set out in Budget 2009. While the focus of the Group is on current expenditure, this does not preclude the Group from looking at capital expenditure if that is necessary to fulfil its remit. It will also ensure that public expenditure is being used to address relevant priority policy objectives in the current fiscal environment and the overall efficiency of the public service will also be examined, including any ways of doing business that are out of step with the needs of a modern, responsive public service.

The Group consists of Mr. Colm McCarthy (Chair) and Mr. Donal McNally as core Members and they will be assisted by Mr. Pat McLoughlin, Mr. Maurice O'Connell, Mr. William Slattery and Ms. Mary Walsh. It will establish its own working methodology and any vacancy arising in the Group will be filled by me.

The Group will report to me every two months and will submit a final report to me by the end of June 2009.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Martin Ferris

Question:

74 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Finance the way he is monitoring and the actions he is taking to ensure that section 44 of the credit institutions (financial support) scheme which states that a covered institution shall not pass on the costs of the guarantee to its customers in an unwarranted manner is being adhered to by financial institutions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45328/08]

The Scheme is a major benefit not only to the banks but also to their customers and, of course, the economy as a whole. Of course, the Scheme includes the application of strict terms and conditions on covered institutions to ensure that the public interest, which includes the taxpayer, the general consumer and small business sector, is paramount.

As I have stated previously, the cost of the charge to institutions should not be passed on to ordinary customers under the Scheme and that is the meaning and purpose to paragraph 44.

Of course the Scheme itself is only about two months old and I will be monitoring its effects over time. My Department and the Financial Regulator are setting up mechanisms for monitoring the financial institutions in relation to the Guarantee and this issue will form part of the work programme.

The Deputy will also be aware that the Financial Regulator has the power to monitor, review, and approve bank charges pursuant to section 149 of the Consumer Credit Act.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

75 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance if he is satisfied that the return to traditional banking practices and principles in respect of lending and borrowing is achievable in the current or predicted climate; if there has been an identification of bad borrowing or lending practices which can or will be addressed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45294/08]

The Guarantee Scheme for financial institutions put in place by the Government has been successful in safeguarding the stability of the Irish banking sector and in restoring its liquidity position in order to support its normal lending activities. The Scheme is intended to provide a detailed framework for the positive and constructive changes that must flow from this to restore and uphold for the future the traditional banking values of responsible and balanced risk-taking lending in order to underpin the long-term sustainability of the banking system.

Financial institutions particularly those participating in the guarantee Scheme have a key role to play in supporting both individuals and businesses in the current challenging economic and financial environment. As I made clear when presenting the Guarantee Scheme to the Oireachtas in mid-October the boards and senior executives of the participating institutions have a key role to play in ensuring that finance is channelled appropriately to support and underpin sustainable economic activities on a prudent and responsible basis which is clearly in the interest of both the bank, the borrower and wider economy.

The Deputy will be aware at recent meetings with certain financial institutions I asked them to consider the contribution that they can make to the economy through appropriate credit initiatives in relation to small and medium sized businesses and otherwise. Subsequently certain institutions have announced new initiatives to help the SME sectors. I welcome these important announcements and look forward to further dialogue on this important issue in the coming days and weeks.

The regulation of lending practices of Irish financial institutions is the statutory responsibility of the Financial Regulator. In addition to what is contained in the Guarantee Scheme, and building on revised capital and liquidity measures which it introduced during 2006 and 2007, the Regulator has instigated a series of new regulatory measures to take account of the changed financial environment, including an increased focus on the management of credit and liquidity risks of the banks. Among the actions the Financial Regulator is taking are the following:- the immediate recruitment of an additional 20 senior supervisory staff with banking experience to be placed on-site in key banks to monitor developments; requiring banks to set out new business plans focusing on the need to reduce their risk profile and how their models of banking are sustainable in the new environment; and enhanced reporting obligations in relation to capital, asset quality and individual large loans to supplement daily liquidity reporting requirements.

In conclusion, many aspects of our regulatory systems have proved themselves to be robust and sound in the recent turmoil. But it is also clear that regulators in Ireland as elsewhere need to learn the lessons of recent events. I am relying on the Financial Regulator to do just that, and to adapt its regulatory systems to new conditions, to take on new skills and to ensure that Ireland has a top class regulatory system.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

76 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the current additional cost of public borrowing in the aftermath of the bank guarantee of covered institutions; the way this compares to the costing of the guarantee in the scheme presented by him to Dáil Éireann; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45343/08]

The thinking behind the Charging Model is set out in some detail in the Annexe to the Scheme. However, the main principle is that the Minister for Finance estimates an aggregate cost that the State will bear as a consequence of the guarantee and each covered institution will pay its share in accordance with its risk profile and the guarantee charging model, subject to the estimated cost to the Exchequer being fully recouped. In case the actual cost for the State is higher, the charge will be adapted accordingly.

The Deputy will be aware that a cost of €1 billion over two years was the original estimate for recouping the cost to the State of extra borrowing. Nothing has yet arisen to suggest that this estimate was inaccurate. The cost of public borrowing constantly changes in the financial markets in response to many different influences, and there is no reason to suggest that these changes are all driven by the guarantee scheme.

Economic Competitiveness.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

77 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether Irish retailers are at a serious competitive disadvantage to those in the UK in view of the 6.5% differential in the respective top rates of VAT in both jurisdictions; his views on introducing measures to help retailers who may be disadvantaged by this tax deferential; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45363/08]

As part of a fiscal stimulus package, the UK Government reduced their standard VAT rate from 17.5% to 15% on a temporary basis with effect from 1 December 2008 to 31 December 2009. I have no plans to make a similar reduction in the standard VAT rate in Ireland or to reduce the rate to the UK level of 15%.

It must be recognised that our starting point is different from the UK's. We already have a low taxation economy, especially in the area of direct taxation, both income and corporation taxes, which has a direct impact on all employment in the State. This lower starting position for direct taxation makes it is more difficult to reduce taxes further.

Already we are borrowing over 10% of all day to day spending on public services (before capital spending). This is unsustainable and we faced difficult choices in bringing forward corrective measures. The estimated €227m that will accrue in a full year from the VAT increase will go some way towards funding necessary public services.

Each 1 percentage point reduction in our standard VAT rate would cost around €450 million in a full year. For Ireland to reduce the standard VAT rate by 2.5 percentage points would cost around €1,125 million in a full year. For Ireland to reduce the standard VAT rate to the UK level of 15%, which would mean a reduction in the standard VAT rate of 6.5 percentage points, this would cost almost €3 billion in a full year. This is equivalent to around two and a half times the amount of revenues to be raised in a full year through the new income levy.

Some of the goods and services that will be affected by the increase in the standard rate are alcohol, cigarettes, cars, petrol, electrical equipment, furniture, telecommunications, cosmetics, confectionery, soft drinks and adult clothing and footwear. The effect of the 0.5% increase in the standard rate is that the price of goods and services, which apply at this rate, will increase by 0.41%. This equates to an increase of 8 cent on a good costing €20, or 41 cent on a good costing €100.

It must be also be recognised that around half the value of goods and services purchased in the State are not subject to the standard rate of VAT and therefore are unaffected by the change in the standard rate. All Government services, local authorities, hospitals and schools etc., are exempt from VAT. The zero rate of VAT applies to the majority of foodstuffs, oral medicines, books and children's clothes and shoes. In addition, housing, electricity, gas, domestic fuels, restaurant services, and labour intensive services such as hairdressing and shoe repair, are applicable at the 13.5% reduced rate of VAT.

Although the reduction in the UK standard VAT rate will have an impact on the price differential on some goods between the North and the South, I would point out that the UK has increased excise on alcohol, cigarettes, petrol and diesel to offset the 2.5% reduction in VAT on these items. Consequently there will be no reduction in the price of these products in Northern Ireland as a result of the reduction in the UK VAT rate to 15%.

The VAT rate is not the only factor in the price differential between North and South of the border. The weakening of sterling has had a far more significant impact on relative prices than any VAT changes in this regard.

As a small open economy, many of our standard rated goods are imported, and cutting the VAT rate could benefit the economies from which we import more than our own. In other words, while, it might help the consumer, it would not be the most effective way of helping our own economy.

There are other means of stimulating the economy, outside of the VAT system. The Government is providing a long term fiscal stimulus through capital investment of approximately 5% of GNP, which is twice the average in the EU. This fiscal stimulus will not only support jobs in the short term but will also add to our long term productive capacity.

Irish taxation policy has given us a significant competitive advantage over the past 15 years. We have ensured that we have had the lowest levels of direct taxation on income, therefore we have had marginally higher indirect taxation. That model of taxation has worked well for our economy and will be even more important now in leading us back to the path of economic growth.

Question No. 78 answered with Question No. 39.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

79 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents she has allocated within her Department to support the better regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45699/08]

The Better Regulation agenda is supported by the Company Law Reform and Business Regulation Section, which is a Unit within the Department's Commerce, Consumers and Competition Division. The Division is headed up by an Assistant Secretary. The role of the Section is to modernise and simplify the Irish company law code; support the work of the Company Law Review Group; drive the cross Department effort to reduce the administrative burden on business by 25% by 2012; and support the work of the High-level Group on Business Regulation.

The total staff complement of the Section is 7: 1 Principal Officer, 2 Assistant Principals, 1 Higher Executive Officer, 2 Executive Officer and 1 Staff Officer.

In addition to the foregoing, the Section can call upon the resources of Forfás, as appropriate, in carrying out their reduction in administrative burden work. Furthermore, Regulatory Impact Assessments are carried out, as appropriate, in cases of new legislative/regulatory proposals by the relevant sections of my Department.

The High-level Group on Business Regulation has a budget of €60,000 for 2008, of which some €36,000 is expected to be spent by year end; for 2009, the budget is €60,000.

Freedom of Information.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

80 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if she will list all valid non-personal freedom of information requests received by her Department, and agencies under her remit in 2006, 2007 and to 1 September 2008; if, in each case, a request was made for an additional payment in relation to anticipated search and retrieval costs, or other associated costs; the amount of the additional payment requested and the reason for same in each case; if the FOI request was subsequently not continued with by the applicant, was refined by the applicant, or if the requested payment was made in full in each case; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45707/08]

There are eight separate prescribed bodies within my Department and its Offices subject to the Freedom of Information (FOI) Acts. The figures outlined below are cumulative figures in respect of my Department and those bodies.

In 2006, there was a total of 58 valid non-personal FOI requests, of which 11 attracted search and retrieval fees of €119.00, €45.38, €40.00, €63.52, €50.79, €50.79, €46.42, €62.85, €1,047.50, €62.85 and €209.50, respectively. Of these 11 cases, the first was refined by the requester and in respect of the last 4, the requests were not continued, as the fees were not paid. The requested fee was paid in full in each of the other cases.

In 2007, there was a total of 49 valid non-personal FOI requests, of which 5 attracted search and retrieval fees of €47.14, €49.90, €20.95, €29.33 and €419.00, respectively. None of these cases was refined by the requester, and the requested fee was paid in full in all but the last case which is ongoing.

In 2008, up to 1 September, there was a total of 46 valid non-personal FOI requests, of which 6 attracted search and retrieval fees of €46.78, €80.00, €32.22, €50.79, €21.87, and €50.79. None of these cases was refined by the requester, and the requested fee was paid in full in each case.

FOI search and retrieval fees are based on the number of hours it takes to efficiently complete this element of the FOI process which involves locating all records considered to be within the scope of the request. The prescribed amount payable per hour has been set by the Minister for Finance at €20.95 per hour.

In relation to the processing of FOI requests in the agencies under the remit of my Department, this is a day to day matter for each agency and one in which I have no function.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

81 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if she will provide this information in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45850/08]

The information requested by the Deputy insofar as my Department is concerned is set out in the following tabular statement:

2007

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

Corporate Risk Strategies Ltd

€24,200 (incl VAT)

The provision of Health & Safety Active Monitoring Reports (Safety Audits) on each of the Department’s eight buildings. The purpose of each Active Monitoring Report is to enable the Department to identify hazards and potential health and safety risks to employees of the Department as is required under Section 19 of the Safety, Health & Welfare at Work Act, 2005

The Department is currently implementing the recommendations contained in the Reports

Mazars

€10,482

Internal Audit Report of the Department’s General Payments Systems

Completed in 2007

RITS

€118,928

Review of the Department’s ICT Security.

Report delivered and recommendations being implemented

Vision Consulting Ltd.

€95,711

Review of the national Employment Rights Authority (NERA) Information Services.

Report delivered and recommendations being implemented

Cawley Nea Ltd.

€43,894

National Employment Rights Authority (NERA) “Awareness of & Attitudes Towards Employment Rights Barometer” Research.

Completed in 2007

Farrell Grant Sparks

€17,000

Third and Fourth (or final) payments for an Ex-Ante Evaluation of the European Social Fund co-funded Human Capital Investment Operational Programme.

Report completed in December 2007.

Vision Consulting Ltd

€186,334

Report of “Findings and Service Insights” from Vision Market Study of Employee Callers for the National Employment Rights Authority to improve Employee Caller Awareness, Information Provision, Service and Satisfaction.

Completed

Background Information and Recommendations from Vision For The National Employment Rights Authority to improve Information Provision, Service, and Satisfaction.

Completed

Economic and Social Research institute (ESRI).

€84,232

To carry out two national surveys relating on workplace bullying — one relating to employees and one relating to employers — inputting to the Bullying in the Workplace Survey Reports 2007.

The surveys were published in March 2007.

2007 —continued

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

Ove Arup & Partners t/a Arup Consulting Engineers

€28,814

Review of the Regulation of Petroleum Handling and Storage Facilities.

Final Report delivered in July 2008.

Mairéad Carey B.L.

€6,050

Legal Services in connection with functions of the Labour Court

Completed

John Gleeson S.C.

€960

Legal Services in connection with functions of the Labour Court

Completed

Indecon Economic Consultants

€5,086.60 (Paid in 2007 — A total cost of €152,599 was divided equally between the Department of Enterprise, Trade & Employment, the Department of Health & Children and FÁS — €50,866.33 each.)

Study of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Vocational Training Services and Rehabilitation Training Services for Persons with a Disability provided by Specialist Training Providers

Completed in 2007. Contract signed in 2006

Indecon Consultants

€2,000

Part payment for a report called the Final Evaluation of the Leonardo II Programme in Ireland. (Indecon’s contract was with the Department of Education and Science (DES). The total cost of the report was €52,041.10. Leargas, the agency that ran the Leonardo programme, paid €25,000 towards the report with the balance paid by the DES. The report was a requirement of the EU funding provided for the initiative.)

Complete 2007

Indecon

€30,000(to Forfas as a 1/3 contribution to the cost of a study.)

Assessing the Implications for Industry in Ireland of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme to provide an assessment of the competitiveness impact of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme on Industry in Ireland

Report completed October 2007

Millward Brown IMS

€44,790

Market Research — overview of the company law compliance environment and the performance of the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) in the discharge of its functions

Finalised

2007 —continued

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

PriceWaterhouseCoopers

€103,259

Forensic Accounting Assignment for the ODCE.

Finalised

Dan Flinter

€8,643

Facilitation of two workshops and Report to High Level Group on Business Regulation

Finished.

RPS Consultants

€9,575

Research relating to the Interim Board of the National Consumer Agency’s response to the White Paper “Delivering a Sustainable Energy Future for Ireland”.

Completed

Goodbody Economic Consultants

€23,595

Review of the Wage Subsidy Scheme

Interim Payment — Report completed in 2008.

WRC Social and Economic Consultants

€26,632

Research Report on Acquired Disability and Employment

Interim Payment — Report completed in 2008.

2008

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

Institute of Public Administration (IPA)

€19,867

Report and Recommendations from the Consultation Process with Staff in the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment.

Report completed and delivered in June 2008. As a consequence of the report an internal action plans has now been agreed on how we can improve in areas such as communications, teamwork and leadership.

Mazars

€10,482

Internal Audit Report on the operations of the Department’s Payroll System.

Completed in 2008

Contractauditline (CAL)

€19,820 (excluding VAT)

Productive Sector Operational Programme (PSOP) Managing Authority Lookback Audit (Part 1)Productive Sector Operational Programme Managing Authority Lookback Audit (Part 2)

Report due by 15 December, 2008

€16,480 (excluding VAT)

[The PSOP is an EU co-funded Operational Programme under the 2000-2006 Structural Funds.]

Report due by 27 February, 2009

KPMG

€273,460

Report of an assessment of a named company’s restructuring plan.

Report completed 11 April 2008.

Indecon Economic Consultants

€185,408

Value for Money Review of Science Foundation Ireland — Part of the Government’s Value for Money & Policy Review Initiative

Report published July 2008

2008 —continued

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

IPA

€3,630

Quality Assessment of Value for Money Review of Science Foundation Ireland — per D/Finance guidelines

Review completed In 2008

CIRCA Consultants

€51,182 (Shared equally between D/ETE and Forfás)

Forfás commissioned evaluation of Ireland’s membership of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)

Awaiting finalization. Publication of report is anticipated by the end of January 2009

CIRCA Consultants, SIA Group and International Panel of Experts.

€105,082 (Shared equally between D/ETE and Forfás

Forfás commissioned evaluation of Discover Science and Engineering Programme

Report has been completed. Publication is anticipated by the end of December 2008

Version 1 (Work started in 2007 and was completed in 2008)

€20,364

Business Process Review (BPR) of the Department’s Insolvency Payments Section.

Report delivered and recommendations being implemented.

Trigraph Professional Services

€2,995

Review of Department’s ICT Project Management procedures and practices.

Report delivered and recommendations being implemented

RITS

€17,669

3 ICT Technical Reports on laptop encryption, the Department’s financials application and scans of on-line systems.

Reports delivered and recommendations being implemented

RITS

€2,580

Report of the forensic analysis of the ESF website.

Analysis underway and report due shortly.

Computer Associates

€13,310

Review of Department’s ICT Backup Systems

Report delivered and recommendations being implemented

Ove Arup & Partners t/a Arup Consulting Engineers

€115,257

Review of the Regulation of Petroleum Handling and Storage Facilities.

Final Report July 2008

Cawley Nea Ltd

€29,645

National Employment Rights Authority “Awareness of & Attitudes Towards Employment Rights Barometer” Research.

Completed

Mairéad Carey B.L.

€7,260

Legal Services in connection with functions of the Labour Court

Completed

IQ Content

€41,261

Website evaluation Report

Completed in June 2008

2008 —continued

Name of Consultant

Cost

Name and Reason for Each Report

Current Position

Social and Market Research

€23,850

Conduct an Equality survey under the European Social Fund (ESF) co-funded EQUAL Community Initiative (CI)

Completed.

Ernst & Young

€25,090

Audit of “DAWN” project under the EQUAL CI

Completed.

PA Consulting

€61,595

Review and Assessment of the EU co-funded EQUAL Community Initiative 2000-2006

Underway.

Millward Brown/IMS

€15,898

Market Research — overview of the company law compliance environment and the performance of the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) in the discharge of its functions (continuation of 2007 contract)

Finalised.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers

Fee not paid to date — original estimate provided was STG£55,650

Forensic Accounting Assignment for the ODCE.

On-going

Grant Thornton

€71,874(incl VAT)

Business Process Re-engineering examination of the Companies Registration Office (CRO).

Not yet finalised

PricewaterhouseCoopers

€26,965

Comparative Report on Media Mergers. This report was commissioned by the Media Mergers Advisory Group which was established on the 30th March 2008 to review the current legislative framework relating to the public interest aspects of media mergers in Ireland.

Completed

Emily Gibson BL

€5,596

Media Research required by the Media Mergers Advisory Group. This report was commissioned by the Media Mergers Advisory Group which was established on the 30th March 2008 to review the current legislative framework relating to the public interest aspects of media mergers in Ireland.

Completed

Goodbody Economic Consultants

€23,595

Review of the Wage Subsidy Scheme

Complete

WRC Social and Economic Consultants

€53,264

Research Report on Acquired Disability and Employment

Complete

Departmental Property.

Joe McHugh

Question:

82 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Finance the type of heating systems that will be employed at the new public service buildings in Buncrana; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45721/08]

There are two buildings adjacent to each other currently under construction in Buncrana, one for the Department of Social and Family Affairs, and the other for An Garda Síochana. These buildings were designed in 2006. Oil-fired boilers provide the heating in both buildings.

It is a policy in the Office of Public Works to consider biomass fuel in all new buildings. A review was undertaken of buildings already designed or in the very early stages of construction with a view to providing space and other facilities for the future installation of biomass boilers. As a consequence of this review, both buildings in Buncrana were re-designed to accommodate the installation of biomass boilers in the future.

Financial Institutions Support Scheme.

Joan Burton

Question:

83 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the position in relation to the reform, reorganisation and recapitalisation of the Irish banking sector, particularly those institutions covered by the bank guarantee; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45390/08]

In my discussions with the covered institutions I have asked all the banks to examine their options to attract or raise private capital to underpin their long term sustainability and support their lending to the economy. I am not promoting or supporting any particular proposal nor would it be appropriate for me to do so. I have however asked all the covered institutions to engage actively with all credible proposals. I am prepared to explore proposals regarding Government participation or involvement that may accompany private investment. Of course, any substantial equity capital raising in a listed bank will require shareholder and regulatory approval.

The Government indicated on 28 November a willingness to participate alongside private investors in the recapitalisation of Irish financial institutions. Talks on this issue are ongoing with the institutions and potential investors. Also not withstanding reports to the contrary, the fact is that, as outlined in my statement of 28 November, I have not asked any institutions to consolidate or merge with any other.

Departmental Properties.

Michael Ring

Question:

84 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Finance if he will ascertain from the Office of Public Works the person who made the decision in relation to recent purchases (details supplied). [45684/08]

In relation to the Garda HQ per cent for art project, representatives from Garda HQ were accompanied to the RHA exhibition by staff from the OPW Art Management Office.

The Art Advisor of the OPW advised the Garda representatives on the art works in the exhibition, and he assisted them in the selection process and recommended art for purchase.

Tax Code.

Richard Bruton

Question:

85 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance the new level of permitted purchases which a person can bring into Ireland without being subjected to border taxation; the level of revenue collected by the authorities here on goods being brought in that exceeded the old limit in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available; and his views on whether there is a large undetected tax loss in this area. [45690/08]

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the value and the amounts of goods that a person travelling to Ireland from outside the EU may bring into the country free of VAT and excise duties are governed by the European Communities (Tax Exemption for Certain Non-Commercial Goods Imported in the Personal Luggage of Travellers from Third Countries) Regulations 2008 (S.I. No. 480 of 2008) which came into operation on 1 December 2008. These regulations also apply to a person travelling to Ireland from a territory where the Community provisions on VAT or excise duty do not apply. Details of the Regulations are set out in the Revenue Commissioners' Public Notice 1878a, which is available on their website.

Under these Regulations, which transpose Council Directive 2007/74/EC of 20 December 2007, the total value of goods, other than alcohol or tobacco, may not exceed €430, or, in the case of a person under 15 years of age, €215. The allowances apply where the goods are intended for a traveller's own use or as gifts and are not for commercial purposes.

Separate quantitative limits apply in the case of alcohol and tobacco products. In the case of tobacco products, these limits have not been changed by the Regulations. In the case of alcohol products, the limit for wine has increased from 2 to 4 litres, and a new limit of 16 litres has been introduced for beer. Otherwise, the limits for alcohol products are unchanged. Lower quantitative limits apply in the case of crewmembers.

Similar provisions apply in respect of customs duty by virtue of Council Regulation (EC) No. 274/2008.

The revenue collected in the three main airports on goods in excess of the limits which applied prior to 1 December 2008 amounted to €161,539.99 for the period 1 December 2007 to 30 November 2008. Ongoing enforcement action being taken by Revenue's customs service indicates that large-scale smuggling is not taking place and that there is no substantial leakage of customs duty, excise duty or VAT.

Departmental Staff.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

86 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Finance the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the better regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45701/08]

My Department is represented on the High Level Group on Business Regulation, the Regulatory Impact Analysis Network and on an interdepartmental working group on reducing administrative burdens. Within my Department, work in support of these groups is undertaken from within existing staff resources. Accordingly, it has not been necessary to dedicate staff and other resources exclusively in this case. It is envisaged that the same situation will apply for 2009.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

87 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45852/08]

The following table sets out details of all consultancy contracts entered into in the years 2007 and 2008 which resulted in or are intended to result in the production of a report. Information on the following offices is included; the Department of Finance, the Office of the Revenue Commissioners, the Office of Public Works, the Public Appointments Service, the Valuation Office, the Office of the Ombudsman, the Commission for Public Service Appointments, the State Laboratory, and the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. In addition the Office of the Appeal Commissioners did not have any relevant contracts in the period to which the Deputy refers.

Year

Contractor

Purpose of contract

Payment

Office

Has the Report been completed?

2007

Cassin Scott Associates Ltd

Audit Methodology Review

21,236

Commission for Public Service Appointments

Yes

2007

Noel Ryan & Associates

Internal Auditor

8,034

Commission for Public Service Appointments

Yes

2008

Noel Ryan & Associates

Internal Auditor

8,748

Commission for Public Service Appointments

Yes

2008

Open Interface

Accessibility & Usability Audit of Website

6,716

Commission for Public Service Appointments

Yes

2008

Institute of Public Administration

HR & Organisation Audit

5,500

Commission for Public Service Appointments

Yes

2007

Ernst & Young

Value for Money Evaluations

102,414

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2007

Norcontel

C&AG ICT System

30,552

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2007

University of Glasgow

Value for Money Evaluations

28,523

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2007

Golden & Associates

Value for Money Evaluations

9,075

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2007

Brookhill Ltd

Value for Money Evaluations

5,808

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Institute of Public Administration

Quality Review of VFM Published Reports

47,493

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Mazers Risk Management

Risk Management Consultancy

29,706

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Matthew Harman & Partners

Value for Money Evaluations

28,938

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Lifestrategies

Value for Money Evaluations

27,007

Comptroller & Auditor General

No

2008

Collier Broaderick

Value for Money Evaluations

21,151

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Golden & Associates

Value for Money Evaluations

18,150

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Golden & Associates

Value for Money Evaluations

14,520

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2008

Golden & Associates

Value for Money Evaluations

9,801

Comptroller & Auditor General

No

2008

Ita Mangan B.L

Value for Money Evaluations

2,420

Comptroller & Auditor General

Yes

2007

Hay Group Ireland, Mount Street, Dublin 2

A job evaluation of approximately one hundred senior posts in the Irish public sector by reference to jobs of a similar weight in the private sector in Ireland.

190,249.19

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Mercer Consulting

PSBB surveys of public service and private sector companies

349,301

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Hay

Hay Job Evaluation Project (Job Evaluation Exercise)

262,166

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Hay Group (Ireland) Ltd.

PSBB surveys of public service and private sector companies

206,956

Department of Finance

Yes

Year

Contractor

Purpose of contract

Payment

Office

Has the Report been completed?

2007

The Reward Partnership

Parallel Benchmarking (Examination of pay of craft workers in the Health and Local Authority sectors).

151,554

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Jenny Smyth & Associates

PSBB surveys of public service and private sector companies

104,863

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Indecon International Economic Consultants

Review of Section 481 Film Relief Scheme

92,112

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Life Strategies Ltd.

Pensions Study (PSBB and Review Body)

87,726

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Goodbody Economic Consultants

Review of exemption from taxation of royalties or income derived from patents.

59,532

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Ernst & Young

Econometric Study of CSO National Employment Survey, 2003

56,657

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

PWC (PriceWaterhouseCoopers)

Risk Evaluation — Accountant’s Branch/PMGs

49,624

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Hay Management Consultants

Review of remuneration of CEOs of commercial State bodies

47,795

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Study of Potential Effects of commencing S110 FA 2007

Goodbody Economic Consultants

43,651

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Indecon (Ireland)

Update of review of scheme of tax relief for residential units associated with nursing homes.

42,592

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Nifast

Hazards and Risks Assessment (to provide a hazards and risk assessment and safety statements for the Department’s Dublin Offices).

22,750

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Horwath Consulting Ireland Ltd. Petrus Consulting Ltd performed an External Evaluation of Horwath Consulting Ltd. report.

Value for Money Review of Ordnance Ireland (with respect to the the Grant-in-Aid provided to the Ordnace Survey Ireland which is used to part fund the OSI).

19,201

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Cornamona Health and Safety

Work Station Review in Tullamore

7,800

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Safety Solutions Limited

Health and Safety audit of Tullamore offices

2,420

Department of Finance

Yes

Year

Contractor

Purpose of contract

Payment

Office

Has the Report been completed?

2008

Hay Group Ireland, Lr. Mount Street, Dublin 2

Job evaluation of senior posts in the Public Sector

114,344

Department of Finance

Yes

2008

Ernst & Young

Study on the economic and budgetary implications of a CCCTB

96,600

Department of Finance

Yes

2008

IPA — Institute of Public Administration

Review of the Capacity of the Dept of Finance

50,000

Department of Finance

Yes

2008

Petrus Consulting

Evaluation of value for money and policy review on construction procurement reform initiative

4,114

Department of Finance

Yes

2007

Sogeti

ICT Strategy Review

120,758

Office of Public Works

No

2007

Grant Thornton

Cash Handling review

42,354

Office of Public Works

Yes

2007

Escat

Security Audit

10,648

Office of Public Works

Yes

2007

Professional Solutions Ltd.

Consultancy services

3,912

Office of Public Works

Yes

2008

CBRE

Value for Money Review of Ptoperty

45,562

Office of Public Works

No

2007

Wilson Hartnell Public Relations

Public Relations Consultancy

22,938

Ombudsman

Yes

2007

Ita Mangan

Communication Audit

10,285

Ombudsman

Yes

2007

Delve Research

Market Research

2,994

Ombudsman

Yes

2008

Open Interface

Website Accessibility Audit

12,705

Ombudsman

Yes

2008

Institute of Public Administration

Risk Management

11,400

Ombudsman

Yes

2007

Crowleys DFK

Auditing Services

18,270

Public Appointments Service

Yes

2007

Dell Computer (Ireland)

IT Services

2,166

Public Appointments Service

Yes

2008

WRC Social & Economic Consultants Ltd

Research Services

30,000

Public Appointments Service

No

2008

Crowleys DFK

Auditing Services

22,199

Public Appointments Service

Yes

2008

Caveon Llc

Specialist Testing Services

8,609

Public Appointments Service

Yes

2008

Dilucid Limited Consultancy

Research Services

7,260

Public Appointments Service

Yes

Year

Contractor

Purpose of contract

Payment

Office

Has the Report been completed?

2008

O Herlihy Access Consultancy

HR Services

908

Public Appointments Service

Yes

2007

Deloitte consultants.

VFM Review of IT External Resources expenditure in 2006.

118,580

Revenue

Yes

2007

Frontend

Revenue website accessibility-audit and advice on redesign strategy.

23,450

Revenue

Yes

2007

Costello Commercial

Valution Advice

20,328

Revenue

Yes

2007

Niamh Brodie

Valution Advice

16,500

Revenue

Yes

2007

IQ Content Ltd.

Review and report upon the Revenue website.

14,641

Revenue

Yes

2007

Polaris HR Ltd.

HR Consultancy

13,315

Revenue

Yes

2007

Gerry McMahon

Valuation Advice

7,099

Revenue

Yes

2007

C. Moore & Associates

Independent Quality Assessment of the VFM Review of IT External Resources expenditure in 2006.

2,677

Revenue

Yes

2007

Carlisle Advisory Services

Fees for Advisory Services/Research

2,420

Revenue

Yes

2007

Enterprise Ireland

Technical advice on tariff classification

2,360

Revenue

Yes

2007

James Nash

Advice on document analysis

847

Revenue

Yes

2007

Psychological Consultancy Services Ltd.

HR Consultancy

726

Revenue

Yes

2008

Costello Commercial

Valuations

42,500

Revenue

Yes

2008

Market Research Bureau Ltd

Research Project Illegal cigarettes

24,845

Revenue

Yes

2008

Peter I Mitchell Phd Cphys

Radiation Protection Adviser

12,000

Revenue

Yes

2008

Niamh Brodie

Valuation opinion

8,100

Revenue

Yes

2008

C. Moore & Associates

Independent evaluation of the Value for Money & Policy Review of IT External Resources Expenditure in 2006

4,283

Revenue

Yes

2008

Cruickshank

Technical Advice

2,370

Revenue

Yes

2008

Miscellaneous Small consultancies

HR Related Reports

1,370

Revenue

Yes

2008

Ballycotton Marine Serv

Maritime feasibility study

700

Revenue

Yes

2008

Gerry McMahon

Tech Consultany on tariff classification

663

Revenue

Yes

2008

O Herlihy Access Consult.

Design

450

Revenue

Yes

Year

Contractor

Purpose of contract

Payment

Office

Has the Report been completed?

2008

Darlington Consulting

Ergonomic Assessment

436

Revenue

Yes

2007

Polaris

Staff Mediation

28,908

State Laboratory

Yes

2007

Pat Firth

Staff Mediation

24,000

State Laboratory

Yes

2007

Clare O’Meara

Carrying out Internal Audit

12,657

State Laboratory

Yes

2008

Atkins Faithful & Gould

Review of Facilities Management contract

8,793

State Laboratory

Yes

2008

Clare O’Meara

Carrying out Internal Audit

7,986

State Laboratory

Yes

2007

Most Consultants

Recruitment Competency Consultancy

32,616

Valuation Office

Yes

2007

Amarach Consulting

Survey on Customer Charter — Independent validation

18,876

Valuation Office

Yes

2007

Curley Smith

Consultant advice on schedule of costs

4,235

Valuation Office

Yes

2007

Price Waterhouse Coopers

Independent validation of Performance Indicator

2,420

Valuation Office

Yes

2008

Amarach Consulting

Independent validation of customer charter

12,584

Valuation Office

Yes

2008

Valuation Office Agency

Consultancy advice on quarries

12,349

Valuation Office

Yes

2008

Tennyson Consultant Engineers

Consultant advice for Valuation Tribunal

4,538

Valuation Office

Yes

Nursing Home Subventions.

Joe McHugh

Question:

88 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason the increased high dependency subvention for nursing home patients that was due to start on 1 January 2008 has not been provided; if she will address this matter; and if she will back date the payment to 1 January 2008. [45688/08]

I assume the Deputy is referring to the Nursing Homes Support Scheme, A Fair Deal. The legislation required in order to introduce the Scheme is complex and involved careful drafting in order to ensure that the interests of older people requiring residential care are fully protected.

The Nursing Homes Support Scheme Bill 2008 was published on 9 October and the Minister introduced it at Second Stage in the Dáil on 13 November. It is intended to progress the legislation through the Houses of the Oireachtas with a view to implementing the scheme in 2009. The Bill provides for financial support under the new scheme to be backdated to the date of the commencement of the Act for existing residents.

Health Services.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

89 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will allocate funding to an organisation (details supplied) in order that they can access a language line so that victims of domestic violence who do not speak English can have access to their helpline and support services; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45789/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Medical Cards.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

90 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children her response to the submission made to her by an organisation (details supplied) prior to budget 2009; if she will address the financial problems amputees have as a result of unavoidable expenses such as the cost of €10,000 for a prosthetic leg. [45797/08]

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

108 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children her response to a submission from an organisation (details supplied) to address the financial problems faced by amputees as a result of the cost of prosthetic limbs and other costs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45796/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 90 and 108 together.

The pre budget submission sought the provision of medical cards to all amputees. I have no plans to provide for the granting of medical cards to any particular group as a whole.

Medical cards are made available by the Health Service Executive (HSE) to persons and their dependants who would otherwise experience undue hardship in meeting the cost of General Practitioner (GP) services. In general, eligibility for medical cards and GP visit cards is determined following an examination of the means of the applicant and his/her dependants (income and relevant outgoings).

In assessing a medical card/GP visit card application, the HSE uses guidelines based on people's means which includes their income after tax and PRSI, and takes account of reasonable expenses incurred in respect of rent or mortgage payments, childcare and travel to work. The assessment process also takes account of other factors, such as medical or social need, which may impact on people's ability to meet the cost of GP services.

My Department is currently reviewing all legislation relating to eligibility for health and personal social services with a view to making the system as fair and transparent as possible. The Eligibility Review Team was established in my Department in 2005, to begin working on a new legislative framework to provide for clear statutory provisions on eligibility for health and personal social services. As part of this work the Department is reviewing the eligibility criteria for the assessment of medical cards in the context of financial, medical and social need in line with the commitment in Towards 2016 to clarify entitlement to a medical card. A Steering Group has been established to carry out this work and is expected to complete its work within the next few months.

Michael D'Arcy

Question:

91 Deputy Michael D’Arcy asked the Minister for Health and Children the amount of savings which a person can have before they are excluded from entitlement to a medical card; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45908/08]

Medical cards are made available by the Health Service Executive (HSE) to persons and their dependants who would otherwise experience undue hardship in meeting the cost of General Practitioner (GP) services. In general, eligibility for medical cards and GP visit cards is determined following an examination of the means of the applicant and his/her dependants (income and relevant outgoings).

In assessing a medical card/GP visit card application for a person aged under 70, the HSE uses guidelines based on people's means which includes their income after tax and PRSI, and takes account of reasonable expenses incurred in respect of rent or mortgage payments, childcare and travel to work. The assessment process also takes account of other factors, such as medical or social need, which may impact on people's ability to meet the cost of GP services.

The HSE's guidelines provide that for persons aged under 70, saving are currently assessed on the following basis: — The first €20,000 of savings/investments for a single person will be disregarded and €40,000 for a couple will be disregarded. — The next €10,000 is assessed as an income of €1 per week per €1,000. — The next €10,000 is assessed as an income of €2 per week per €1,000. — Savings/Investments in excess of the above are assessed as an income of €4 per week per €1,000.

For persons aged 70 and over, the Government's proposal, to be effected in legislation, is that automatic entitlement to a medical card for this cohort will end on 31st December 2008, and with effect from 1st January, 2009, the income thresholds for entitlement to a medical card for those aged 70 and over will be €700 (gross) per week (€36,500 per year) for a single person and €1,400 (gross) per week (€73,000 per year) for a couple. Persons whose income is above the specified thresholds will have until 2nd March 2009 to advise the Health Service Executive that their income is above those limits. After that date, their medical card will no longer be valid.

As part of the means test for persons aged 70 or over after 1st January 2009, any savings and similar investments up to €36,000 (single) / €72,000 (couple) will be disregarded and only interest from savings or similar investments above these figures will be considered as income for means testing purposes.

Health and Safety Assessments.

Michael Ring

Question:

92 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children if a risk assessment (details supplied) has been carried out at locations; if these risks included ornamental fountains; and the precautions that have been put in place as a result of these risk assessments. [45686/08]

My Department has no water fountains in any of its buildings. In December 2007, Health Buildings International (HBI) were contracted by the Office of Public Works to carry out a Risk Assessment Survey on water systems in Hawkins House. The survey was carried out with reference to all current legislation and best practice guidelines and in accordance with Health and Safety Commission recommendations contained within the document "Legionnaires' Disease — The control of legionella bacteria in water systems — Approved code of practice & guidance" (L8).

The summary report indicated negligible risk but highlighted a number of recommendations and requirements which were required to be carried out to ensure all risk systems meet a standard of compliance with ACOP, L8. A number of remedial works have already been completed. The Department and the Office of Public Works are ensuring that the remainder of the recommendations are carried out.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

93 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents she has allocated within her Department to support the Better Regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45703/08]

The concept of Better Regulation is one to which my Department is wholly committed. Officers from my Department at Principal, Assistant Principal and Administrative Officer level, as appropriate, have in 2008, as part of their relevant responsibilities, attended meetings of the Inter-Departmental Group on Administrative Burden Reduction and the Regulatory Impact Analysis Network. Further, officials from various sections in the Department have worked on a one to one basis with the RIA Network in the preparation of certain legislation in support of the goal of achieving Better Regulation. In a similar manner, the Department co-operates with the Statute Law Revision Project which is also part of the Better Regulation agenda.

Accordingly, since Better Regulation is seen as an ongoing process in my Department relevant to everyone engaged in legislation and policy analysis and review rather than as a dedicated function for a limited number of specific officers, it is not possible to reflect the human and financial resources involved in a quantifiable manner as envisaged in the Deputy's question.

Health Services.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

94 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Health and Children the cost of security cover for the former Bon Secours Hospital in Tuam, County Galway since the site was acquired by the Health Service Executive up to 1 December 2008; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45715/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

Ulick Burke

Question:

95 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a claim by a person (details supplied) in County Galway has not been processed together with a further 2000 outstanding claims under the nursing home repayment scheme which are awaiting verification despite assurances that this process would be completed within a two year timeframe; the further reason clients have not been advised in writing in relation to these delays; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45724/08]

The Health Service Executive has responsibility for administering the Repayment Scheme and the information sought by the Deputy relates to matters within the area of responsibility of the Executive. My Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and to have a reply issued to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Ulick Burke

Question:

96 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Health and Children if there is a developmental clinic for young infants available in the health centre, Loughrea, County Galway; the age at which children are called for these assessments; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45726/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

97 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason for the delay in processing the claim for a person (details supplied) under the health repayment scheme; the further reason an appeal lodged in September 2007 was not responded to; the average time for the resolution of appeals; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45742/08]

The Health Repayment Scheme Appeals Office is an independent office established to provide an appeals service to those who wish to appeal the decision of the Scheme Administrator under the Health (Repayment Scheme) Act 2006. The Health Repayment Scheme Appeals Office received a completed appeal form from the claimant referred to by the Deputy on 19 September 2007 and the Appeals Officer commenced his investigations.  Unfortunately, the Appeals Officer had not made a determination on this appeal by October 2008 when the patient's son informed the Appeals Office that the patient was deceased.

While every effort is made to determine an appeal as soon as possible, the time taken to resolve an appeal is dependent on the complexity of the appeal and whether any additional reviews are required to be completed by the Health Service Executive or Scheme Administrator. The patient's son was informed that the appeal would have to be withdrawn due to the death of the patient and a ‘follow on' claim would have to be submitted by the legal representative of the estate in compliance with the established legal framework governing the operation of the scheme.

The average completion time for an Appeals Officer's decision is currently 102 calendar days. A second Appeals Officer was appointed on 1 September 2008 to ensure that outstanding appeals are processed as quickly as possible. It is regretted that it was not possible to process this particular appeal prior to the death of the patient in order that she could benefit from any repayment due.

Vaccination Programme.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

98 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Health and Children when a child (details supplied) in County Cork will receive their BCG immunisation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45751/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Foster Care.

Finian McGrath

Question:

99 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of children and teenagers with foster families here. [45756/08]

The September 2008 Performance Monitoring Report of the HSE includes the information that there are 4,800 children and teenagers with foster families here.

Health Services.

Finian McGrath

Question:

100 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of children considered at risk here who are under the observation of the Health Service Executive. [45757/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Departmental Offices.

Joe McHugh

Question:

101 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of square meters of unused office space or potential office space in the Health Service Executive estate in County Donegal; and the number of metres of office space or potential office space unused at St Conal’s Hospital Estate, Letterkenny, County Donegal. [45758/08]

Office space in the Health Service Executive estate in County Donegal is a service issue and the query has been referred to the Executive for direct reply.

Joe McHugh

Question:

102 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Health and Children the amount of money being spent on the renting and leasing of private property by the Health Service Executive in each of the 26 counties on a county basis in tabular form. [45759/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

Eamon Scanlon

Question:

103 Deputy Eamon Scanlon asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason a claim by a person (details supplied) in County Leitrim under the nursing home repayment scheme was refused; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45760/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

General Medical Services Scheme.

James Reilly

Question:

104 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of general practitioners who will retire year on year over the next five years; the plans in place to replace these GPs in view of the fact that there is a lead-in time in excess of a year to fill a post; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45772/08]

The number of General Practitioners who are in active practice is some 2,500, of which some 2,100 are contracted by the Health Service Executive (HSE) to provide services under the General Medical Services (GMS) Scheme. General Practitioners (GPs) are self employed contractors and my Department does not therefore collect the statistics sought by the Deputy. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to examine this matter and to provide the information which it has available directly to the Deputy.

A joint Department of Health and Children / HSE working group on workforce planning was established in June 2006. It also includes representatives of the Departments of Finance and Education and Science, and the Higher Education Authority. Research is currently being undertaken by FÁS on behalf of the joint working group. This research will analyse the labour market for 12 healthcare grades and professions, including GPs, and will help determine future GP training needs. FÁS is expected to complete its work in February 2009 when it will report its findings to the joint working group.

Hospital Staff.

James Reilly

Question:

105 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of consultants who will retire year on year over the next five years; the specialties in which these retirements will take place; the plans in place to replace these consultants in view of the fact that there is a lead-in time of in excess of a year to fill a post; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45773/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Health Services.

James Reilly

Question:

106 Deputy James Reilly asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason public health nurses in the north east are not doing dressings for patients who are medical card holders; if it was not the purpose of the Health Service Executive to bring uniformity of service to all people here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45792/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Child Care Services.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

107 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the amount of money recouped from private child care providers in County Meath who received a grant to develop and operate a child care facility and who subsequently ceased to operate; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45795/08]

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

121 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the individual grants given to private child care providers in County Meath from 2003 to date in 2008; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45826/08]

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

122 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the private child care facilities which received a grant in the period 2003 to 2008 in County Meath and which no longer operate; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45827/08]

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

123 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the procedure for recoupment of public moneys in County Meath when a private child care provider who has received a public grant ceases to operate; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45828/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 107 and 121 to 123, inclusive, together.

As the Deputy is aware, I have responsibility for the National Childcare Investment Programme (NCIP) which has a total allocation of €575m, of which €358m is in respect of capital funding, and €217m is in respect of current funding. The NCIP is the successor programme to the Equal Opportunities Childcare Programme (EOCP) which concluded at the end of 2007. The EOCP was, and the NCIP is administered by Pobal on behalf of my Department.

The status details in relation to 15 of the applicants is shown as "pre-contract". In the first ten of these cases, funding has been approved in principle, but the applicants are currently undergoing a pre-contract process and no payments have been made to date. In the final five of these cases, funding was approved in principle, but these applicants did not proceed to contract and the approvals were formally decommitted. No payments were made in these cases, and therefore the question of recoupment did not arise.

In relation to the applicants shown under the heading "Decommitment of unspent/unpaid funding", the first applicant was approved a grant of €75,000, but only spent a total of €69,919. The balance of €5,081 was formally decommitted but, as this amount had not been paid to the applicant, the question of recoupment did not arise. The second applicant was approved a grant of €1,175. This amount issued to the applicant, but was returned unspent. There was no recovery process initiated.

The decommittal and recovery of approved funding can arise where an applicant either does not proceed to contract, or is in breach of contract.

All applicants for funding under the EOCP and the NCIP were/are obliged to enter into a contract with Pobal in relation to the provision of the childcare service. The contracts provide that the facility must remain in operation for a certain number of years following receipt of the final instalment of the grant. The number of years varies from two years to seven years, depending on the amount of the grant approved, as follows:

EOCP

NCIP

Up to €19,044

2 years

Up to €30,000

2 years

€19,045 – €36,821

5 years

€30,001 – €70,000

5 years

€36,822 – €50,790

7 years

€70,001 – €100,000

7 years

Until the final instalment of the grant is received, the provider is obliged to regularly report and account for all expenditure incurred. Once this process has been concluded, the provider is required to complete an annual Confirmation of Continued Service document until his or her contractual obligations are fulfilled, i.e. for the requisite number of years as laid down in his or her contract.

Pobal would not normally be made aware of cases where a facility ceases to operate following the completion of the provider's contractual obligations. Therefore, Pobal is not aware of any private childcare providers in County Meath who received a grant to develop and operate a childcare facility since 2003 and who subsequently ceased to operate within the term of their contract.

The following table provides details of the funding approved for 50 individual private childcare providers in Meath since the beginning of 2003:

Private Providers Approved Childcare Funding in Meath 01 January 2003-08 December 2008

Date Funding Approved:

Applicant Name / Facility Name

Status

Amount Approved

Decommitment (if applicable)

Net Amount Approved

07/07/2006

Alison Hickey / NCIP Alison Hickey

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

22/06/2005

Angel Faces Creche / Angel Faces Creche — Glen Abhainn

Funding paid

35,000

n/a

35,000

13/10/2005

Angel Faces Creche / Angel Faces Creche — Innwood

Funding paid

35,000

n/a

35,000

13/10/2005

Bambinos Creche & Montessori / Bambinos Creche & Montessori

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

07/07/2006

Coole Montessori School / NCIP Coole Montessori School

Funding paid

33,750

n/a

33,750

21/07/2003

Deanhill Montessori School / Deanhill Montessori School

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

25/09/2006

Geri’s Montessori / NCIP Geri’s Montessori

Funding paid

3,750

n/a

3,750

04/02/2008

Giraffe Childcare Ltd / NCIP Giraffe Childcare & Early Learning Centre (Navan)

Funding paid

40,000

n/a

40,000

04/02/2008

Hopscotch Creche and Montessori Limited / NCIP Hopscotch Creche and Montessori

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

04/02/2008

Karen Keane / NCIP Karen Keane

Funding paid

45,000

n/a

45,000

27/03/2003

Karen McGovern / Mother Hubbards Childcare (Blackcastle Demesne)

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

07/03/2007

Karen McGovern / NCIP Mother Hubbards Creche (Flower Hill)

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

05/09/2003

Kentstown Montessori School / Kentstown Montessori School

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

10/05/2006

Kidz of the Manor / NCIP Kidz of the Manor

Funding paid

58,650

n/a

58,650

25/09/2006

Lisa Mallan / NCIP Acorn Academy

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

07/07/2006

Mammy Day Care / NCIP Mammy Day Care

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

15/12/2006

Marion Guckian / NCIP Kilcoon Preschool

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

12/12/2005

Mornington Montessori Creche & Afterschools Club / Aspiration’s

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

10/05/2006

Oasis Childcare Centre / NCIP Oasis Childcare Centre

Funding paid

51,736

n/a

51,736

15/12/2006

Pear Tree Cottage / NCIP Pear Tree Cottage

Funding paid

26,250

n/a

26,250

10/06/2004

Rugrats Academy / Rugrats Academy

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

07/03/2003

Sandy’s Childcare Ltd / Sandys Nursery & Montessori Playschool (Dunshaughlin 1)

Funding paid

50,000

n/a

50,000

21/01/2003

Sandy’s Childcare Ltd / Sandys Nursery & Montessori Playschool (Navan)

Funding paid

50,000

n/a

50,000

Private Providers Approved Childcare Funding in Meath 01 January 2003-08 December 2008 —continued

Date Funding Approved:

Applicant Name / Facility Name

Status

Amount Approved

Decommitment (if applicable)

Net Amount Approved

24/03/2006

Scallywags Playgroup & Afterschool Service / NCIP Scallywags Playgroup & Afterschool Service

Funding paid

35,111

n/a

35,111

18/12/2006

Seagrave Montessori / NCIP Seagrave Montessori

Funding paid

9,750

n/a

9,750

27/03/2003

Simonstown Preschool and Playschool / Simonstown Preschool and Playschool

Funding paid

8,532

n/a

8,532

11/08/2006

Stamullen Academy of Childcare Ltd / NCIP Stamullen Academy of Childcare Ltd

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

07/07/2006

The Belfry Creche & Montessori / NCIP The Belfry Creche & Montessori

Funding paid

29,361

n/a

29,361

15/06/2006

The Glebe Creche Limited / NCIP The Glebe Creche Limited

Funding paid

47,072

n/a

47,072

11/08/2006

The Kilberry School of Montessori / NCIP The Kilberry School of Montessori

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

26/08/2004

The Montessori Story / The Montessori Story (Kells)

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

10/05/2006

The Schoolhouse Montessori / NCIP The Schoolhouse Montessori

Funding paid

37,331

n/a

37,331

15/12/2006

Tir na Nog Highscope / NCIP Tir Na Nog Highscope

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

16/10/2003

Tir Na nOg T/A. Clann Lir Childcare / Tir Na nOgT/A. Clann Lir Childcare

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

25/09/2006

Tom & Anne O’Gorman / NCIP Elderdale Montessori & Afterschool

Funding paid

100,000

n/a

100,000

05/09/2003

Tom & Anne O’Gorman / Tom & Anne O’Gorman

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

14/01/2004

Windmill Nursery & Montessori School / Windmill Nursery & Montessori School

Funding paid

50,790

n/a

50,790

18/10/2008

ACE Childcare Ltd / NCIP Ard Cluin Creche

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

26/04/2007

Aideen Newport / NCIP Aideen’s Cute ’n’ Clever Kids

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

18/10/2008

Care Bears Playgroup / NCIP Care Bears Playgroup

Pre-contract

11,388

n/a

11,388

04/02/2008

Fiona Tierney / NCIP Fiona Tierney

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

04/02/2008

Gortwella Creche / NCIP Gortwella Creche

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

Private Providers Approved Childcare Funding in Meath 01 January 2003-08 December 2008 —continued

Date Funding Approved:

Applicant Name / Facility Name

Status

Amount Approved

Decommitment (if applicable)

Net Amount Approved

04/02/2008

Hilltop Creche & Montessori / NCIP Hilltop Creche & Montessori

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

18/10/2008

Kids Klubs / NCIP Kids Klubs

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

18/10/2008

Little Acorns / NCIP Little Acorns

Pre-contract

100,000

n/a

100,000

04/02/2008

Nicola Maguire / NCIP Little Buddies Playgroup & Montessori

Pre-contract

90,000

n/a

90,000

23/10/2006

Vickette Ltd. / NCIP The Willows Creche & Montessori

Pre-contract

40,000

n/a

40,000

Did Not Proceed to Contract:

27/03/2003

June Fegan / Dolly Dimples

Pre-contract

50,790

-50,790

0

20/11/2003

Tir na nOg Childcare Service / Tir na nOg Childcare Service

Pre-contract

6,455

-6,455

0

25/09/2006

Yellow Furze Montessori School / NCIP Yellow Furze Montessori School

Pre-contract

100,000

-100,000

0

15/12/2006

Anne Byrne / NCIP Buzzy Bees

Pre-contract

3,000

-3,000

0

07/03/2007

Jigsaw Creche Limited / NCIP Jigsaw Creche (Dunboyne)

Pre-contract

100,000

-100,000

0

Decommitment of Unspent/ Unpaid Funding Only:

25/09/2006

Rainbow Lane Limited / NCIP Rainbow Lane Limited

Funding paid

75,000

-5,081

69,919

25/09/2006

Forever Friends / NCIP Forever Friends*

Funding paid

1,175

In process

1,175

Applicants: 50

Totals:

3,282,001

-265,326

3,016,675

*This applicant has returned its unspent funding paid to Pobal.

Key:

Pre-contract: Funding ‘indicatively' approved only — no payments made to date.

Funding paid: Some or all of the amount approved has been paid to the applicant concerned.

Question No. 108 answered with Question No. 90.

Medical Aids and Appliances.

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

109 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Health and Children if the Health Service Executive will provide local minor repair services for hearing aids in County Louth; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45805/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Health Services.

James Bannon

Question:

110 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the steps she proposes to take to counteract the adverse impact on dental patients of the halving of tax relief in budget 2009 for patients who require non-routine dental treatments such as orthodontics, root canal treatments and periodontal treatment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45810/08]

My Department and the Health Research Board periodically sponsor epidemiological studies aimed at assessing the oral health status of the population. There is no evidence available to me at present to suggest that fiscal policy decisions such as the one referred to by the Deputy will result in a deterioration in the population's oral health. I intend to publish shortly a National Oral Health Policy aimed at delivering quality oral health services in a planned and cost effective way over the next ten years.

Health Representative Organisations.

James Bannon

Question:

111 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children if the role of the Irish Dental Association will be given essential recognition under the plans to amend the Competition Act 2002 to allow for greater engagement with health representative bodies; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45811/08]

My Department engages with the Irish Dental Association on an ongoing basis in relation to a wide range of issues. I met with the Irish Dental Association on the 15th November last where the issue of the Government's plans to amend the Competition Act 2002 was discussed. I am aware of the position of the Irish Dental Association in relation to the Competition Act and I am keeping the matter under review.

Child Care Services.

James Bannon

Question:

112 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the position of the application by an association (details supplied) for funding under the National Childcare Investment Programme 2006-2010 for a new and purpose built child care facility to include pre-school and after school services. [45813/08]

As the Deputy will be aware, I have responsibility for the National Childcare Investment Programme 2006 -2010 (NCIP), which will invest €575 million over 5 years, with €358 million of this in capital grant aid for childcare services. I understand that the service in question has applied for €430,000 in capital funding through its local County Childcare Committee. This application is currently being assessed by Pobal, which is engaged to administer grants under the NCIP. Following Pobal's assessment of the application it will be forwarded to the Childcare Directorate of my Office for recommendation on funding. The service will then be notified of the decision.

Health Services.

James Bannon

Question:

113 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children when a child (details supplied) in County Longford will receive essential orthodontic treatment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45814/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Services for People with Disabilities.

James Bannon

Question:

114 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children the funding allocation for 2009 in respect of the disability sector following the diverting of €17 million from this sector; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45816/08]

Almost €1 billion is provided each year to non-statutory providers of disability services. In line with the efficiency measures being taken elsewhere in the health system, an efficiency reduction of 1% will be applied by the HSE to the allocations of non-statutory disability agencies for 2009.

Under the Multi Annual Investment Programme additional funding of €75m was allocated in both 2006 and 2007. In the 2008 Budget, €50m was provided to the Health Service Executive (HSE) to fund a range of additional services under the Multi Annual Investment Programme for Disability. Although the commencement of the planned developments in disability services this year had been delayed due to a financial review, I am pleased to inform you that the Executive has informed the Department of Health and Children that it is now in the process of rolling out the planned developments. The HSE has indicated that due to the delayed start to some of these developments, it expects to spend €33m of the €50m by the end of 2008. The resulting €17m time related savings were included in this Department's budgetary consolidation measures announced to the House in July 2008.

As the issue raised is a matter for the HSE it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

James Bannon

Question:

115 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children her plans on behalf of an association for persons with an intellectual disability (details supplied) in County Longford, to ensure continued service to users of this facility in view of the cut in allocations paid to non-statutory service providers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45817/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

James Bannon

Question:

116 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Health and Children if the final tranche of the multi-investment programme initiated in 2005, which amounts to €50 million, will be delivered to the disability sector in 2009, the final year of the programme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45818/08]

An additional €20 million for health and education services for children with special educational needs was announced in Budget 2009. €10 million of this allocation will be to the Health Service Executive (HSE), and €10 million to the Department of Education and Science, to enable the services provided to children with special educational needs to be enhanced and strengthened, as a first step towards the full implementation of the EPSEN Act, and of Part 2 of the Disability Act for 5 to 18 year olds, at a later date.

The additional €10m allocated to the HSE will provide for 125 additional therapy posts in the disability and mental health services, targeted at children of school-going age. An additional 90 posts will be provided in the disability services area, to include speech & language therapists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and psychologists for children's disability services. There will be 35 additional posts for the child & adolescent mental health services, including clinical psychologists, occupational therapists, speech & language therapists and social workers for new and existing multi-disciplinary teams. As the specific issue raised by the Deputy is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Health Services.

John Deasy

Question:

117 Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Health and Children if she will provide funding to the Health Service Executive for the provision of an outpatient addiction treatment centre for Waterford; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45819/08]

As the Deputy's question relates to a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

118 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children when a health centre (details supplied) in County Clare will be opened; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that it is ready to be occupied and that the running costs are unlikely to be much more than costs associated with running services in other inappropriate settings; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45821/08]

As the Deputy's question relates to a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Clinical Indemnity Scheme.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

119 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the progress that has been made in discussions aimed at including independent midwives in the State’s insurance package; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45823/08]

Historically the Irish Nurses Organisation has facilitated a certain level of insurance cover to independent self-employed community midwives who were members of that organisation. As and from 30th September it withdrew this facility. I would like to emphasise that I support choice for women in childbirth. However, the option of domiciliary births must only be provided in a safe and secure manner. This was the key finding of the Expert Group on Domiciliary Births which reported in 2004. The Health Service Executive established a National Implementation Committee, representative of all the stakeholders involved, to implement the recommendations of the report.

Following extensive consultations, agreement has been reached for the extension of the HSE's cover, under the State's Clinical Indemnity Scheme, to include self-employed community midwives. This is subject to the signing by the individual midwife of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Health Service Executive (HSE). The MOU is constructed on the basis of appropriate forms of governance, clinical supervision, clinical care pathway, performance management and audit frameworks being in place to ensure a safe system for home births.

The new arrangements came into operation on 1st October 2008. These arrangements cover those midwives who have signed the MOU with the HSE and provide a robust national clinical governance framework which ensures that self-employed community midwives work closely with the HSE, the HSE maternity services and voluntary maternity hospitals.

Health Service Staff.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

120 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of occupational therapists who have been recruited in 2008 to fill the estimated 183 unfilled posts at the end of 2007; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45825/08]

Almost 130,000 people work full-time or part-time in our public health services. In recent years, the Government's ongoing high level of investment in health has achieved and maintained significant increases in the numbers of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals employed in the public health services. The Government has also invested heavily in the education and training of such personnel in order to secure a good supply of graduates to provide for the healthcare needs of the population into the future.

Subject to overall parameters set by Government, the Health Service Executive has the responsibility for determining the composition of its staffing complement. In that regard, it is a matter for the Executive to manage and deploy its human resources to best meet the requirements of its Annual Service Plan for the delivery of health and personal social services to the public. As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Questions Nos. 121 to 123, inclusive, answered with Question No. 107.

Health Services.

Michael Ring

Question:

124 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children when a response to a proposal (details supplied) will issue. [45831/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

125 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Health and Children the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if she will provide this information in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45854/08]

The information requested regarding consultancy expenditure for the years 2007 and 2008 is set out in the following document, a copy of which has issued directly to the Deputy:

2007

Count

Consultant

Contract Details

Expenditure (incl VAT)

1

Childrens Research Centre, Trinity College

A Study of Intercountry Adoption Outcomes in Ireland.

188,194.00

2

Collier Broderick Management Consultation Ltd

Engaged to carry out analysis of staff survey 2007 and report on the findings.

10,000.00

3

School of Public Health and Population Science, UCD

To conduct an All-Ireland Traveller Health Study.

349,000.00

4

Carr Communications

To develop and implement a communications strategy for the announcement of a new initiative on Long Term Care for Older People.

48,400.00

5

Colm Rapple, Economist and financial journalist.

To facilitate a one-day round table meeting on the financial abuse of older people.

3,000.00

6

Peter Cassells Consultants Ltd

Chairing Alcohol Marketing Communications Monitoring Body

18,150.00

7

Peter Cassells Consultants Ltd.

Chairing Sustaining Progress Implementation Group on Alcohol Misuse

18,150.00

8

Dr Mark Morgan

To complete the Irish portion of the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD)

48,400.00

9

SLAN 07 Consortium

To undertake National Health and Lifestyle Survey (SLAN 07)

755,233.00

10

NUI, Galway

To undertake Health Behaviours of School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study

91,299.50

11

Independent Review Group

Independent Clinical Review of Symptomatic Breast Care Services at Barrington’s Hospital, Limerick

137,474.48 between Sept 2007 and March 2008

12

Dublin Institute of Technology

Research commissioned on : The Physical Chastisement of Children by Parents

76,033.98

13

The Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College

Research commissioned on: A follow up study on the educational and Social Support experiences of Young People in Long Term Foster Care

19,000.00

14

The Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College

Research commissioned on: Public Library Services for Children and Young People in Ireland

34,118.40

15

The Centre for Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), National University of Ireland, Galway

Research commissioned on: Ethics Committees and Ethics Approval for Children’s Research in Ireland

21,583.80

16

School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College

Research commissioned on: A Study of Parent-Child Agreements and Arrangements based on Court Records

21,626.00

17

The Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College

Research commissioned on: Child Protection Services in Ireland: An Evaluation

45,145.00

18

Dublin Institute of Technology

Research commissioned on: Services and Supports for Children on Remand in Ireland

29,986.67

2007 —continued

Count

Consultant

Contract Details

Expenditure (incl VAT)

19

The School of Psychology and The Children’s Research Centre, Trinity Collegeand The Dublin Institute of Technology

Research commissioned on : Children’s Perspectives on Parenting Styles and Discipline

10,200.00

20

Economic and Social Research Instituteand Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College

Research Commissioned on : National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland (NLSCI)

4,825,290.21

21

Dr. Satya Brink,DirectorHuman Resources Development Canada

International expertise provided to the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland Steering Group

12,496.10

22

Professor Ann SansonNetwork CoordinatorAustralian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Melbourne

International expertise provided to the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland Steering Group

6,220.26

23

Child and Family Research Centre, NUIG

Report on Youth Café Provision

31,511.42

24

Cnag ar an Doras Consultancy and Life Coaching

Service to evaluate and facilitate the Children and Young People’s Forum

12,152.00

25

Cnag ar an Doras Consultancy and Life Coaching

Project management of consultations on alcohol misuse including preparation of the report.

30,093.00

26

Cnag ar an Doras Consultancy and Life Coaching

Evaluate the Comhairle na nOG Development Fund programmes and submit periodic reports to OMC Communications and Participation Team Management.

9,680.00

27

Liz Harper

Evaluation of Children and Young People’s Forum 2005 — 2007.

12,000.00

28

Liz Harper

Evaluation of Dáil na nÓg Council.

5,000.00

29

National Youth Council of Ireland (NYCI)

Service to manage operate and develop Dáil na nÓg and Dáil na nÓg Council including report of event.

311,173.00

30

Professor John Pinkerton, Queens University BelfastDr Pat Dolan, Dr John Canavan, NUI Galway

The consultants were requested to produce a concise and clear children’s policy for the Office of the Minister for Children — The Agenda for Children’s Services

11,946.00

31

Fitzpatricks Associates, Economic Consultants

Value for Money Review of the Equal Opportunities Childcare Programme

30,443.00

32

Raymond Burke Consulting

Quality Assessment of the Value for Money Review

2,995.00

33

Teri Garvey

Facilitator engaged to manage work days for complementary therapist organisations and to produce a short report for the Department

14,000.00

Total

7,239,994.75

2008*

Count

Consultant

Contract Details

Expected Cost in 2008 (incl VAT)

1

School of Public Health and Population Science, UCD

Travellers Health Study

593,000.00

2

Dr Mark Morgan

European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD)

24,151.00

3

Mr Peter Cassells Consulting Ltd

Alcohol Marketing Communications Monitoring Body

18,150.00

4

Accenture

Knowledge Strategy on Children’s Services

84,700.00

5

Tom Considine

Study on HSE Accounting Practices — Tom Considine

54,450.00

6

Tender process underway

Review of the Nursing Degree Programme

Nil

7

Professor Brendan McCormack

Review and Analysis of Initiatives and Literature in relation to Practice Development in the Irish Healthcare setting

15,000.00

8

National University of Ireland

Children as Carers — A study of the extent to which children undertake inappropriate care roles

43,390.00

9

Tender process underway

Evaluation of Home Care Packages

Nil

10

PA Consulting Group

Analysis for Regulatory impact Assessment on Nursing Home Standards

80,000.00

11

Collier Broderick Management Consultants

External Stakeholders Survey, 2008

24,199.50

12

Dublin Institute of Technology

Research commissioned on: the Physical chastisement of children by parents

50,689.00

13

The Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College, Dublin

Research commissioned on: A follow up study on the educational and social support experiences of young people in long term foster care

14,250.00

14

Economic and Social Research Institute

Research commissioned on: National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland (NLSCI)

5,109,227.00

15

Dr Satya Brink, HR Development Canada

International Expertise provided to the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland (NLSCI)

Value of contract is fixed at a per diem rate and overall cost is dependent on the extent of the service requested and provided

16

Professor Ann Sanson, Network coordinator, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Melbourne

International Expertise provided to the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland (NLSCI)

Value of contract is fixed at a per diem rate and overall cost is dependent on the extent of the service requested and provided

*Information relating to 2008 is the expected spend in each consultancy for this year, based on figures supplied up to the end of September, 2008.

2008* —continued

Count

Consultant

Contract Details

Expected Cost in 2008 (incl VAT)

17

Mr Jeremy Neathey, Associate Director of Research Economic and Social Research Council, UK

International Expertise provided to the National Longitudinal Study of Children in Ireland (NLSCI)

Value of contract is fixed at a per diem rate and overall cost is dependent on the extent of the service requested and provided

18

Child and Family Research Centre, NUIG

Report on Youth Café Provision

26,043.00

19

Cnag ar an doras, Consultancy and Life Coaching

Service to evaluate and facilitate the Children and Young Peoples Forum. Reports of evaluation submitted to OMC Communications and Participation Team Management

12,804.00

20

Cnag ar an doras, Consultancy and Life Coaching

Service to evaluate OMCYA Inclusion Programme to include provision of reports

15,307.00

21

Cnag ar an doras, Consultancy and Life Coaching

Project Management of consultation on teenage mental health issues including preparation of report

36,935.00

22

Cnag ar an doras, Consultancy and Life Coaching

Evaluate the Development Fund programmes and submit periodic reports to OMC Communications

19,602.00

23

Liz Harper

Evaluation of Dail na nOg Council

7,500 estimated expected amount in 2008 (incl. 3,250 paid to date)

24

Liz Harper

Facilitation of OMC Inclusion Programme.

6,000 to date in 2008

25

National Youth Council of Ireland (NYCI)

Service to manage, operate and develop Dail na nOg and Dail na nOg Council incl. report of event

363,513 total expected amount to spend in 2008 (incl. of 101,173 paid to date in 2008)

26

Queen’s University, Belfast

Economic analysis in the context of developing a National Oral Health Policy

25,000.00

27

Tender process to commence shortly

ICT analysis of DTBS and DTSS systems in the context of developing a National Oral Health Policy

15,000.00

28

York Health Economics Consortium

Commission to establish a 35 hour week for nurses and midwives

137,895.00

Total

6,776,805.68

*Information relating to 2008 is the expected spend in each consultancy for this year, based on figures supplied up to the end of September, 2008.

Ambulance Service.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

126 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children if she is satisfied that the ambulance fleet throughout the country has been adequately updated and modernised in terms of vehicles, equipment, staff and staff training; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45863/08]

Jack Wall

Question:

143 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of ambulances attached to the Kildare-west Wicklow area of the Health Service Executive; the location at which they are stationed; the number of ambulance personnel within the same area and base to which they are attached; the position of the control base for all of the ambulances and the mechanism of control; the linkage with other HSE areas; if there is a link with such areas for emergency cover or ordinary everyday operations; if so, the cover that is maintained within the Kildare-west Wicklow area on such occasions; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45917/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 126 and 143 together.

As the issues raised are service related, they have been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Health Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

127 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which her Department has identified specific funding for orthodontics; if this is expected to meet requirements in terms of a reduction in waiting lists; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45864/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply.

Services for People with Disabilities.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

128 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of children born in each of the past ten years affected by autism or Asperger’s syndrome; the degree to which research has been undertaken to identify possible cause or causes on a county or regional basis; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45865/08]

The position as outlined in my Department's responses to the Deputy's PQs Ref No 322 and 323 of 30th September 2008 and Ref No 279 of the 25th November 2008 has not changed in the interim in respect of these matters.

Hospital Staffing.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

129 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the degree to which agency nursing staff are utilised in the public and private hospital sectors; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45866/08]

As the question asked by the Deputy in so far as it refers to the public hospital sector is a service matter it has been referred to the HSE for direct reply. Information on the utilisation of agency nursing staff in the private hospital sector would not be a matter for my Department or the HSE.

Accident and Emergency Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

130 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children if she is satisfied regarding the availability of adequate accident and emergency staff at all locations throughout the country over the next 12 months; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45867/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Cancer Incidence.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

131 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which she has received or sought information which might indicate the level of various forms of cancer on a county or regional basis; if any such comparisons have been made with previous years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45868/08]

Statistics in relation to cancer incidence are collated by the National Cancer Registry. My Department has asked the Director of the Registry to examine this matter and to reply directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

132 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of cystic fibrosis patients who received transplants here in the past 12 months; the number referred overseas; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45869/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Cancer Screening Programme.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

133 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which laboratory facilities to meet all expected requirements are available here without referring same overseas; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45870/08]

I assume the Deputy is referring to the cytology laboratory provider for CervicalCheck, the National Cervical Screening Programme. The contract was awarded to Quest Diagnostics earlier this year. As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply.

Health Services.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

134 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which the health budget for 2009 is expected to meet requirements in full to the end of 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45871/08]

I approved the National Service Plan for the Health Service Executive on Tuesday and I have laid it before both Houses. In approving the Plan I emphasised the necessity for the HSE to operate within the limits of its voted allocation in delivering at a minimum the levels of service which are provided for in the plan.

In broad terms the Plan outlines that the HSE will deliver the same activity in 2009 as in 2008. In order to deliver the level of services it is committing to, the HSE will be reconfiguring many front line services. This is in keeping with the overall strategic direction as set out in the HSE Corporate Plan 2008-2011 and includes: conversion of inpatient work to day case work, a focus on reducing inpatient length of stay in acute hospitals, reduction of in-patient bed numbers and associated costs and the provision of more services in community settings, thus reducing the dependency on in-patient beds.

The vote of the Executive was determined in the context of the fiscal challenges facing the country. In framing the vote the Government has provided an additional €950m to meet service pressures, including €120m to deal with pressures arising from demographic trends, such as increased birth rates and increased numbers of older people. However the Government has also required the Executive to undertake a range of cost saving measures and value for money initiatives of €323m in order to fund the increased level of expenditure in 2009.

With regard to pay I have allocated funding to meet the full year cost of the national pay award introduced in September of this year. However, in line with Government's overall approach no additional funding has been allocated in respect of the pay award due in September next year. I have requested the Executive's Board to submit a detailed plan to deliver sufficient savings in pay and overhead costs which have no impact on front line services to enable this award to be paid.

In addition to the measures I have just outlined I have also allocated a further €55m to enable the Executive to implement the ‘Fair Deal' initiative as well as €15m to further develop cancer services and €10m for services for people with disabilities.

The current position regarding the public finances demands the most careful control of public expenditure. This requires all of those working within the HSE and the agencies it funds to control costs and seek to get the most from existing budgets. I am satisfied that the level of funding for the HSE will, through effective budgetary management and changes in service delivery, enable it to maintain and improve overall service provision and allow for key developments in line with the Government's priorities.

Hospital Accommodation.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

135 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the extent to which comparisons have been made regarding bed occupancy in the public and private sector; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45872/08]

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

137 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of hospital beds available to the health services in the public and private sector; the way this compares with the number available over the past 20 years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45874/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 135 and 137 togehter.

The latest available comparable national data on average bed numbers in the public acute hospital sector relates to the period 1993 to 2006. This information is set out in the following table. Equivalent information for the period prior to 1993 is not available. This information has been provided to the Department of Health and Children by statutory health agencies and hospitals. These figures refer to the average number of beds available over each year, taking beds that have been temporarily closed or opened into account. It is important to note that the number of beds available in any hospital may fluctuate over time depending on service demands and other factors such as seasonal closures and refurbishment.

The table shows an increase over the 1993-2006 period of in excess of 2,100 beds (including day places) in public acute hospitals.

The Programme for Government includes a commitment to provide an additional 1,500 public acute hospital beds. In this context, the co-location initiative which I announced in July 2005 aims to make available approximately 1,000 additional acute beds for public patients through the transfer of private activity from public hospitals to co-located private hospitals. The balance will be made available through the Health Service Executive's capital programme.

Neither my Department nor the Health Service Executive routinely collects bed numbers or patient activity data in relation to the private acute hospital sector. Furthermore the nature and scope of the services provided in these two sectors differs considerably and would not easily allow for meaningful comparison of bed occupancy rates.

Publicly Funded Acute Hospitals Average number of beds available for use 1993-2006

53 HSE Network Acute Hospitals only

Totals

1993

11,417

1994

11,498

1995

11,652

1996

11,719

1997

11,730

1998

11,685

1999

11,731

2000

11,905

2001

12,145

2002

12,497

2003

12,713

2004

13,015

2005

13,346

2006

13,528

Notes (i) Figures refer to the average number of beds available for use over the year taking beds that were temporarily closed or opened into account.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

136 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Health and Children the number of extra public hospital beds expected to become available to co-location; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45873/08]

The aim of the acute hospital co-location initiative is to make available approximately 1,000 additional public acute hospital beds for public patients by transferring private activity, with some limited exceptions, from public acute hospitals to co-located private hospitals. Co-location is considered the quickest and least expensive means of providing significant additional bed capacity for public patients. No capital outlay is required as the beds in the public hospitals are already in place, having been funded by the Exchequer.

Significant progress has been made on the co-location initiative. The Board of the HSE has approved preferred bidder status for the development of co-located hospitals at Beaumont, Cork University, Limerick Regional, St James's, Sligo and Waterford Regional Hospitals. Project Agreements for the first four of these projects have been signed. Planning permission was granted by An Bord Pleanála for the Beaumont project in November 2008. The decision of An Bord Pleanála is awaited in the case of the Cork and Limerick projects, where planning has been granted and appealed. An application for planning permission in respect of the St James's project is expected to be made shortly. Preparatory work in relation to the Project Agreements for the two remaining projects is proceeding. Two further projects at Connolly and Tallaght Hospitals are at earlier stages of the tendering process.

Question No. 137 answered with Question No. 135.

Cancer Incidence.

David Stanton

Question:

138 Deputy David Stanton asked the Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 420 of 8 July 2008, if she has given further consideration to conducting a baseline health study in the Cobh area of County Cork; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45904/08]

Earlier this week my colleague the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government published the report on the assessment of current site conditions at the former Irish Steel facility at Haulbowline. The report was compiled by Environmental Consultants who were engaged by the Minister earlier this year to carry out an independent and rigorous assessment of site conditions. The assessment involved analysis of soil, slag, dust, surface and ground water samples for all likely contaminants to determine whether there is a threat to human health or the environment and to assist in securing the site from a health and safety perspective pending the Government's decision as to its future use.

The report from this assessment will inform subsequent discussions at Cabinet level and I understand that the Minister will bring a Memorandum to Government in the New Year for decisions on whatever actions are shown to be necessary including the question of any studies in regard to human health.

Nursing Home Subventions.

Frank Feighan

Question:

139 Deputy Frank Feighan asked the Minister for Health and Children when persons (details supplied) in County Roscommon will be considered for the new nursing home scheme. [45911/08]

The Nursing Homes Support Scheme Bill 2008 was published on 9 October and the Minister introduced it at Second Stage in the Dáil on 13 November. It is intended to progress the legislation through the Houses of the Oireachtas with a view to implementing the scheme in 2009.

Only after the legislation has been enacted, and the scheme commenced, can the Health Service Executive begin to consider applications under the Nursing Homes Support Scheme. Existing nursing home residents in public or approved private nursing homes, and new entrants to public and approved private nursing homes, will be able to apply for State support.

In order to become approved for the purposes of the scheme, a private nursing home must:

(a) be registered under the Health (Nursing Homes) Act 1990 at present and, in the future, under the Health Act 2007 (once the relevant sections are commenced),

(b) have agreed a price for the purposes of the scheme with the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF),

(c) hold a valid tax clearance certificate.

Departmental Expenditure.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

140 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Health and Children her estimate of the annual cost to the Exchequer of providing each carer with a needs assessment every year, every two years and every three years. [45912/08]

Róisín Shortall

Question:

141 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Health and Children her estimate of the annual cost to the Exchequer of providing a free medical check to each carer. [45913/08]

Róisín Shortall

Question:

142 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Health and Children her estimate of the annual cost to the Exchequer of providing in-home respite for a week to each carer. [45914/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 140 to 142, inclusive, together.

I am very conscious of the important role of carers, particularly family carers. However, as there are no plans to introduce these three initiatives referred to by the Deputy, the Department has not carried out an exercise to estimate the potential cost of introducing them.

Question No. 143 answered with Question No. 126.

Medical Cards.

Jack Wall

Question:

144 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Health and Children the position of a medical card application in respect of a person (details supplied)in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45918/08]

As this is a service matter it has been referred to the Health Service Executive for direct reply to the Deputy.

Nursing Home Subventions.

Richard Bruton

Question:

145 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Health and Children the money which she had made available in the 2009 Estimates for implementation of the nursing home support scheme; if it will be funded on a demand led basis from the date of its introduction; the number of months she expects this budget to cover for the scheme; and the planned commencement date. [45919/08]

Budget 2009 provided €55 million for the implementation of the Nursing Homes Support Scheme next year. This brings the total funding in the subhead for long-term residential care in 2009 to €909 million. However, the timeframe for commencement of the scheme will be contingent upon the passage of the legislation through the Houses of the Oireachtas and the successful negotiation by the National Treatment Purchase Fund of agreed prices for the scheme Within this context, and the operation of subhead B16 during 2009, I anticipate that the Scheme will commence during the second half of 2009.

The existing requirement on the HSE, under the 1970 Health Act as amended, to make available long-term residential care is subject to the overall resources available to the HSE. The Nursing Homes Support Scheme will also incorporate a resource limit and will not be demand-led. Each year the Government will have the opportunity to allocate whatever resources it considers appropriate to meet the needs of applicants under the Scheme. This will ensure there is an incentive to seek value for the taxpayer when agreeing prices for nursing home places in both public and private nursing homes. It will also highlight the need to avoid inappropriate admissions to long-term care and the importance in that context of continuing to develop and fund alternative community- based support services.

Airport Development Projects.

Terence Flanagan

Question:

146 Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Transport if, in line with the improved standards for value for money, he will approve an independent cost benefit analysis of Dublin Airport’s proposed parallel runway; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45673/08]

The Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) operates under a clear commercial mandate and its capital investment programme, including the proposed new parallel runway, is entirely funded from its own internal resources.

Proposals in relation to the development of Dublin Airport are, in the first instance, a matter for the DAA, which has statutory responsibility to manage, operate and develop the airport and to provide such facilities and services as it considers necessary for aircraft and passengers. Accordingly, the application of a cost benefit analysis or other appropriate appraisal in relation to the new runway is a matter that falls within the responsibility of the management and board of the DAA, operating within its commercial mandate.

State Airports.

Michael Ring

Question:

147 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Transport his views on a fairer scheme (details supplied) whereby the economic value of all airports is recognised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45685/08]

I would again refer the Deputy to my reply to his previous question (Dáil Question No. 81) answered on 4 December, 2008. The basis on which the scheme operates was dictated by the need to comply with the relevant mandatory EU guidelines. A scheme on the lines outlined by the Deputy would not be in compliance with those guidelines.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

148 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Transport the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45706/08]

Work in my Department on better regulation is an integral part of the functions of a number of staff in my Department and, hence, there are no full-time dedicated staff or budgets allocated to that function. All Divisions in the Department are aware of their obligations to conduct regulatory impact assessments when preparing legislative proposals. Each division takes its own decision on whether a full regulatory impact analysis is required. Each division is also responsible for preparing draft regulatory proposals and transposing EU directives which are settled by the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and for reducing administrative burdens where possible. Information notes on EU Commission proposals are prepared by line divisions for the Joint Committee on European Affairs. The legal services unit co-ordinates the monitoring of transpositions and attends the Inter-Departmental Co-ordinating Committee on EU Affairs to report on the Department's progress in relation to the transposition of EU directives. The Department also has a full-time legal advisor and a legal network to advise and assist staff on legal issues.

Road Safety.

Brian Hayes

Question:

149 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Transport the reason he signed on 14 September 2008, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2008, in view of the potentially disastrous effect this could have for business here in the distribution of goods throughout the island of Ireland; the number of other EU countries which have such severe restrictions on distribution vehicles within their respective jurisdictions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45770/08]

The vehicle height limit of 4.65 metres was introduced in the interests of public safety and the protection of costly road and rail bridge infrastructure from accidental damage by high vehicles, and was made following a very extensive public consultation process and prior notification to the European Commission. With a limit of 4.65 metres, I am satisfied that the objective of bringing about a higher level of safety consistent with the competitiveness of Irish trade and industry will be achieved. A maximum vehicle height limit applies in most European countries.

Airport Development Projects.

James Bannon

Question:

150 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Transport the position regarding the provision of an airport for the midlands regions and in particular the extension of an airstrip at Abbeyshrule Aerodrome, Abbeyshrule, County Longford to facilitate improved accessibility to the midlands to promote investment, employment opportunities and growth in tourism; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45809/08]

The existing network of State airports and regional airports is adequate to cater for the air transport needs of all parts of the country for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, I have no plans to develop any new airport in the midlands region. The long-standing policy of my Department is that private interests may develop airports in whatever location they wish, as long as the requirements of the Irish Aviation Authority are met and planning permission is secured.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

151 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Transport the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relating to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45857/08]

The information requested by the Deputy is contained in the following table:

Consultant

Cost

Report

Status of Report (i.e. whether report is completed and implemented etc)

Dom Hegarty

18,876

A review of funding arrangements for Long Mile Road Junction

Completed and implemented.

Goodbody Economic Consultants

59,986

Value for Money Review of Traffic Management Grants

Completed and being implemented

Petrus Consulting

2,904

Independent Review of above Review

Completed and being implemented

Community Transport Association of Ireland Ltd

2,500

Study into development of Cross-Border Transport Service

Completed and implemented

Ann Frye Ltd

4,548.31

Peer Review of Transport for All

Completed

Configure Ltd

36,663

Doors checks on selection of domestic Passenger Ships

Completed and being implemented

PA Consultants

85,486.50

Report on the cost of motor insurance premiums for young drivers which was undertaken on foot of a commitment given by the Government in the Social Partnership Agreement ‘Towards 2016’

Report completed and findings published in June 2008.

Warren Estates auctioneers

1,210

Valuation-South quay, Wicklow

Completed

Baker Tilly O’Hare

6,050

Updates and monitoring of Dundalk 21 October 2005

Completed

Richard Hooper

18,000

Bremore report

Completed

Deloitte and Touche

20,570

Review on audited accounts for port companies

Completed

INDECON (Ireland)

157,550

Dublin Port Study

Ongoing due for completion 2009

Danwood

4,4250

Print Management / Efficiency Report for the Department

Draft report delivered.

Colin Buchanan & Partners Ltd

26,550.34

Cycle Study for Navan

Report is completed.

Colin Buchanan & Partners Ltd

45,913

National Cycling Policy

Report is completed.

Contractauditline

82,825

Closure audits of EU-funded projects under the ESIOP for the Department of Transport

Completed. Follow-up in progress.

Phoenix Safety, The Digital Hub,10-13 Thomas Street, Dublin 8,Ireland.

10,698.13

Preparation of a mandatory safety statement for the four Marine Survey Office around the country.

Completed

Sogeti Ireland Ltd, Hardwicke House, Upper Hatch Street, Dublin 2

80,066.10

Development of an IT Vision for the Marine Safety Sector

Completed and implemented

Consultavia

68, 804

Auditing, technical and commercial advice services to the Irish Coast Guard for its Helicopter Service

Ongoing

M. Aherne & Associates

22,675

Accommodation and technical advice for Irish Coast Guard Coordination Centres

Completed

Consultant

Cost

Report

Status of Report (i.e. whether report is completed and implemented etc)

Eagle Lyon Pope

44,175

Technical advice on Emergency Towing Vessel

Being Prepared

70,059*

Article 4 verification checks on EU co-financed public transport projects under the ESIOP 2000-2006

Completed

Raymond Burke Consulting

3,265

Independent External Evaluation of the Expenditure Review of the Subvention paid to CIÉ

Completed

Deloitte Touche

285,000

Cost and Efficiency review of Bus Eireann & Bus Átha Cliath

Final Report due shortly

Mr. Pat Butler S.C.

33,275

Report of the Public Inquiry into the Cork-Midleton Railway Order application

Completed & implemented

Caplin Meehan

14,217.50

Financial Audit of cohesion funded rail network track and signalling project

Completed

Risk Solutions Ltd

119, 198 ex VAT

Value for Money review of the second Railway Safety Programme

Report to be finalised December 2008

Petrus Consultants

2,887.50 ex VAT

External Evaluation of Value for Money Review of the Second Railway Safety Programme

Report to be finalised December 2008

Goodbody Corporate Finance / Matheson Ormsby Prentice / Mott MacDonald

1,347,165

Report and advice relating to procuring facility management operator for Terminal Two at Dublin Airport

Ongoing

Peter Cassells Consultants Ltd

30,250

Consultancy relating to the Cork Airport debt

Complete

INDECON (Ireland)

67,979.98

Capital Expenditure Grant Scheme Review for regional airports

Complete

Steer Davies Group

179,358

Ongoing appraisal audits

Ongoing

Booz & Co.

197,226

Ongoing implementation Audits

Ongoing

Goodbody Economic Consultants

105,320

Business Case review programme of Transport 21 projects

Ongoing

Goodbody Economic Consultants

27,823

Review of Department of Transport Common Appraisal Framework Guidelines

Ongoing

Goodbody Economic Consultants

6,196

Drafting of Department of Transport Post project review guidelines

Ongoing

Drury Communications Ltd

74,643

Information & communications strategy for Transport 21

Completed.Implementation ongoing

Note: invoice for expenses incurred over period of contract due shortly.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

152 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45704/08]

The Deputy will appreciate that the work of the Better Regulation group has, by definition, a systemic effect on how my Department goes about the business of developing policies and legislation — primary and secondary — and negotiating EU instruments within my functional area. As the group's work must, by its very nature, become an integral part of these processes and the general public policy formation process within my Department, it is not possible to isolate the staffing and financial resources involved in the manner requested by the Deputy. In light of my Department's extensive programme of criminal and civil law reform, however, the resources consumed in meeting our obligations in this respect are significant.

Asylum Applications.

Jimmy Deenihan

Question:

153 Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made on the application by a person (details supplied) for subsidiary protection; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45783/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 3 December 2004. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Subsequently, in accordance with section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999, as amended, the person concerned was informed by letter dated 30 March 2007 that the Minister proposed to make a deportation order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a deportation order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. In addition, he was notified of his entitlement to apply for subsidiary protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006). The person concerned submitted an application for subsidiary protection in the State in accordance with these regulations. This application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome. In the event that the subsidiary protection application is refused, the case file of the person concerned, including all representations submitted, will be considered under section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999, as amended, and section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996, as amended, on the prohibition of refoulement. When this latter consideration has been completed, the file is passed to me for decision.

Liquor Licensing Laws.

Brian O'Shea

Question:

154 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the proposals he has to stop below cost selling of alcoholic drink; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45785/08]

The problem of below-cost selling and special promotions of alcohol was examined by the Government Alcohol Advisory Group. The group's consideration of these matters is outlined in paragraphs 3.54 to 3.65 of its report. The group did not recommend measures to address below-cost selling due to the difficulty of enforcing such proposals. It was not clear on whether such measures would contradict EU trade provisions. The group recommended in paragraph 3.62 of its report measures to control promotional practices which encourage the excessive consumption of alcohol. Section 16 of the Intoxicating Liquor Act 2008 implements the group's recommendations in this regard by providing for the introduction of regulations relating to the sale, supply and consumption of intoxicating liquor. The regulations are required to be notified in draft form to the European Commission under the EU technical standards directives. This notification process takes a minimum of three months. Following the enactment of the 2008 Act, I approved the drafting of regulations to prohibit a licensee from selling or supplying intoxicating liquor at a reduced price or free of charge on the purchase of a quantity of alcohol as provided for at section 16(1)(b). The use of loyalty cards or bonus points in connection with alcohol sales is also prohibited. These draft regulations, which were drawn up in consultation with the Department of Health and Children and the Office of the Attorney General, have recently been notified to the European Commission.

Asylum Applications.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

155 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a decision will be made on a family reunification application for persons (details supplied) in County Kildare. [45788/08]

I refer the Deputy to my answers to Question No. 1213 of 30 January 2008 and Question No. 131 of 9 October 2008. I am informed by the immigration division of my Department that a family reunification application was received from the person referred to by the Deputy in May 2002. A decision was issued in January 2005. A review of that decision was carried out in 2005. Following the review, the person in question was notified that the original decision was upheld. A new application for family reunification was received from the person in December 2007. This application was forwarded to the Refugee Applications Commissioner for investigation as required under section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996. The investigation has been completed and the commissioner has forwarded a report to my Department. The report will be considered by my Department and a decision on the application will issue in due course.

Citizenship Applications.

Catherine Byrne

Question:

156 Deputy Catherine Byrne asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason for refusing an application for naturalisation in respect of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8; if he will relay these reasons in writing to the person concerned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45798/08]

An application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's Question was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department on 13 December, 2005. I decided to refuse this application and the applicant was informed of my decision by way of letter dated 20 November, 2008.

In reaching that decision, I exercised the absolute discretion as provided for by the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Acts. The said Acts do not provide for a formal process of appeal of my decision to refuse naturalisation. However, I am obliged to make the reasons for my decision available to the applicant under the provisions of Section 18 of the Freedom of Information Act (FOI), 1997. I understand that the applicant submitted a request under the FOI Act for records held by my Department in this matter and a decision on that request was communicated to him on 25 November, 2008. If, following an examination of the copy of his case file, the applicant considers that my decision has been based on incorrect or incomplete information, it is open to him to seek a review of that decision.

Waste Disposal.

Catherine Byrne

Question:

157 Deputy Catherine Byrne asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a piece of land (details supplied) in Dublin 8 owned by his Department is subject to illegal dumping; the way he will rectify this problem; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45799/08]

I am grateful to the Deputy for bringing this matter to my attention and I have asked the Irish Prison Service to take any action required in order to address it. I am informed that an inspection will be carried out in the near future to determine what further measures are needed to prevent the activities in question.

Citizenship Applications.

Brendan Howlin

Question:

158 Deputy Brendan Howlin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will confirm that the waiting period for the processing of applications for naturalisation is 28 months from date of receipt; if so, if he has proposals to reduce this timeframe to a more reasonable waiting period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45802/08]

There are currently 15,600 applications for naturalisation with the Citizenship Division of my Department that are awaiting a decision. The number of applications which were made more than 18 months ago is 6,400 and of these 30% (1,900) are on hold awaiting a response from the applicant and 44% (2,800) are awaiting a response from other statutory bodies as part of the normal applications checking process.

Following the recent decentralisation of the Citizenship Division to Tipperary Town, substantial resources have been made available to it in order to reduce backlogs and provide a better quality service to all applicants. This has had a positive impact on processing times and the average time from application to decision for the generality of valid applications is now at 23 months. A significant number of applications are initially found to be invalid for a variety of reasons and these are now being dealt with and returned to the applicant within a week. More complicated cases can at times take more than the current average while an element of straight forward cases are now being dealt with in less than that time scale. It is expected that this will progressively improve over the coming year and the Division is currently commencing further processing of applications received in mid 2007.

The Deputy will appreciate that there is a limit to the reduction in the processing time that can be achieved as applications for naturalisation must be processed in a way which preserves the necessary checks and balances to ensure that it is not undervalued and is only given to persons who genuinely satisfy the necessary qualifying criteria.

Public Order Offences.

Finian McGrath

Question:

159 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will support a matter in an area (details supplied) in Dublin 3. [45804/08]

I am informed by the Garda authorities that the location referred to by the Deputy is in Clontarf Garda Sub-District. While at present no complaints in respect of the location are the subject of Garda investigation, any such complaints received would be the subject of investigation.

A member of the local Community Policing Unit is allocated to this area and liaises with the local community. An active Neighbourhood Watch Scheme is in place, and the community Garda attends its regular meetings. Any issues raised are attended to.

The area is subject as directed by local Garda management to regular patrols by uniform and plain clothes units, including the Community Policing Unit. Patrols are supplemented by the District Garda Mountain Bike Unit, Detective and Drugs Units, the Divisional Crime Task Force and the Traffic Corps.

Current policing policy in the area is predicated on the prevention of crime, including crimes of violence against persons and property, the prevention of public order offences and the maintenance of an environment conducive to the improvement of the quality of life of the residents. This strategy is, and will continue to be, central to the delivery of the policing service in this area.

Garda Investigations.

Charlie O'Connor

Question:

160 Deputy Charlie O’Connor asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the efforts to bring to justice the killers of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45829/08]

The investigation into the killing of the individual in question is active and ongoing. An Garda Síochána is leading the investigation, which has a significant cross-border element. Liaison with the Police Service of Northern Ireland was established at the outset of this investigation, and the Garda continues to receive comprehensive assistance from the PSNI. To date fourteen individuals have been arrested in connection with this investigation; seven of these in this jurisdiction, and seven in Northern Ireland. The House can be assured that everything will continue to be done to bring the perpetrators of this brutal crime to justice.

Garda Deployment.

Tony Gregory

Question:

161 Deputy Tony Gregory asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 161 of 19 November and 182 of 26 November 2008, if he will expedite a reply to question 182 from the Garda authorities in view of a recent murder (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45836/08]

The death of Mr O'Kane is deplored by all right thinking people and our sympathy is with his family and friends as well as the community in East Wall. Recent developments in the case preclude me from making any further comment on it at this time.

I have been informed by the Garda Commissioner that members of the local Community Policing Unit have attended over twenty meetings with various groups representing the East Wall area including the East Wall Residents' Association. Individual residents from the East Wall area have also attended meetings of the North Inner City Community Policing Forum, the meetings of which are held in Store Street Garda Station and have also met with local Garda Management. Additional patrols by Gardaí and other special initiatives targeting various criminal activities, based on analysis of recorded crime and crimes trends, are addressing any issues brought to the attention of An Garda Síochána in the specific area referred to.

As I have outlined above, the Gardaí and the local community in East Wall work closely together and I believe that this tragic incident will reinforce their determination to continue working together.

The Deputy will appreciate that dealing with public disorder is an issue on which cooperation between the Gardaí and the local community is vital. That is why I am proceeding with the roll out of the joint policing committees, following its successful pilot phase. As part of this pilot, a committee was established in the Dublin City Council area, and further sub-committees in each of the city's five areas. These committees enable local authority representatives and officials and the Gardaí, with the participation of Oireachtas members and community interests, to get together in a structured way to discuss matters affecting the policing of the area. I believe that this approach has great potential.

The situation in the East Wall area will be kept under close review and the policing needs of this area will be fully considered by the Commissioner within the overall context of the needs of Garda stations throughout the country.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

162 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants for the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45855/08]

In the time available it has not been possible to compile the full and accurate detail of the information sought by the Deputy. When I have the information to hand I will respond to the Deputy.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

163 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when it is expected an application for residency will be concluded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45879/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 11 February 2002. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 14 May 2003, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State.

Representations have been submitted on behalf of the person concerned and these representations will be fully considered, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, before the file is passed to me for decision.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

164 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when it is expected that residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Cork will be concluded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45880/08]

The person concerned arrived in the State on 26 February 2004 and applied for asylum. Her application was refused and a Deportation Order was signed in respect of her on 15 November 2005. Judicial Review proceedings challenging the Deportation Order were instituted on 20 December 2005. These proceedings were determined on 18 January 2008 and the reliefs sought were refused by the High Court. Costs were awarded in favour of the Respondents on the 29 January 2008.

The person concerned submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection pursuant to the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 S.I. No. 518 of 2006 ('The Regulations') on 13 February 2007. She was informed on 22 February 2007 that her application was invalid as the Deportation Order had been made in respect of her prior to the coming into force of the Regulation on 10 October 2006. Judicial Review proceedings challenging this decision were instituted on 4 May 2007.

These Judicial Review proceedings were settled following the Judgment of Mr. Justice Feeney in the cases of Hila & Djolo, where he determined that under Regulation 4(2) of the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 S.I. No. 518 of 2006 that I have discretion to accept and consider applications for Subsidiary Protection from persons who do not have an automatic right to apply but who have identified new facts or circumstance which demonstrate a change of position from that which pertained at the time the Deportation Order was made.

Subsequently the person concerning submitted an application pursuant to Regulation 4(2) of the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 S.I. No. 518 of 2006 on 23 November 2007, requesting that I exercise discretion to accept and consider an application for Subsidiary Protection. Following a consideration of the material submitted it was concluded that the applicant had established no grounds which would enable me to exercise discretion under Regulation 4(2). The person concerned was notified of my decision on 18 March 2008. Judicial Review proceedings challenging the Regulation 4(2) decision were instituted on the 8 April 2008 and are still on going and as the matter is sub judice, I do not propose to comment further.

Visa Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

165 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will review the application for a visa in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 1; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45881/08]

My Department has no record of a visa application for the person detailed. However, following contact by my officials with the Deputy's office, I can inform the Deputy that on 21 November 2007, a family member of the person concerned applied for a ‘join parent' visa. This was refused by the Visa Officer on 5 December 2007 for a number of reasons:

1. There was insufficient documentation submitted in support of the application;

2. Documentation submitted was not translated;

3. There was no evidence of finances shown;

4. It is not general policy to grant a visa to dependent family members over the age of 18, to join or visit persons granted residency/residing in the State.

5. The immigration history of the applicant.

The applicant lodged an appeal on 15 January 2008. The decision of the Visa Officer was upheld by the Appeals Officer on 25 January, 2008. The only option now available to the applicant is to make a fresh visa application. Comprehensive information regarding visa applications can be found on the website of the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service at www.inis.gov.ie.

Deportation Orders.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

166 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45882/08]

I refer the Deputy to the reply given to his Parliamentary Question No. 229 on Thursday 15 May 2008. The status of the person concerned remains as set out in that reply.

Citizenship Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

167 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when consideration of an application for citizenship will be concluded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45883/08]

An application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's question was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department on 20 August 2003. On examination of the application it was determined that the person concerned did not meet the statutory residency requirements as set out in the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended. A letter informing the applicant of this was issued on 25 October 2005. It is open to the individual concerned to lodge a new application if and when she is in a position to meet the statutory residency requirements.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

168 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when it is expected that an application for residency or citizenship will be concluded in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45884/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 16 April 2003. His asylum application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 16 August 2005, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State.

Representations have been submitted on behalf of the person concerned and these representations will be fully considered, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, before the file is passed to me for decision.

Deportation Orders.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

169 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will review the deportation order in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Meath; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45885/08]

The person concerned arrived in the State on 2 February 2007 and applied for asylum on 7 February 2007. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, and, on appeal, by the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999, as amended, the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 4 March 2008, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State i.e. why he should not be deported.

I should also mention that a person who has been refused refugee status and has been served with a notice of intention to deport is, since 10 October 2006, afforded a fourth option, viz. to apply for Subsidiary Protection pursuant to the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 — Statutory Instrument No. 518 of 2006. By correspondence dated 22 April 2008, an application for Subsidiary Protection was made on behalf of the person concerned by his legal representative. Following consideration of the information submitted, the application was refused. The person concerned and his legal representative were notified of this decision by letter dated 2 September 2008.

His case was then examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended, and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996, as amended, on the Prohibition of Refoulement. Consideration was given to representations submitted on his behalf by his legal representative for permission to remain in the State. On 30 October 2008, I refused permission to remain temporarily in the State and instead signed a Deportation Order in respect of him. Notice of this order was served by registered post requiring the person concerned to present himself at the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) 13-14 Burgh Quay, Dublin 2 on Tuesday 25 November 2008 in order to make travel arrangements for his removal from the State. The person concerned presented as required and is due to present again on Thursday 18 December 2008.

I am satisfied that the applications made by the person concerned for asylum, for temporary leave to remain in the State and for Subsidiary Protection, together with all refoulement issues, were fairly and comprehensively examined and, as such, the decision to deport him is justified. The effect of the Deportation Order is that the person concerned must leave the State and remain thereafter out of the State. The enforcement of the Deportation Order is, and remains, an operational matter for the GNIB.

Citizenship Applications.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

170 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the basis on which a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15 can re-apply for citizenship; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45886/08]

The Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956, as amended, provides that the Minister may, in his absolute discretion, grant an application for a certificate of naturalisation provided certain statutory conditions are fulfilled. These conditions are that the applicant must:

be of full age;

be of good character;

have had a period of one year's continuous residency in the State immediately before the date of the application and, during the eight years immediately preceding that period, have had a total residence in the State amounting to four years;

intend in good faith to continue to reside in the State after naturalisation;

have made, either before a Judge of the District Court in open court or in such a manner as the Minister, for special reasons allows, a declaration in the prescribed manner, of fidelity to the nation and loyalty to the State.

In the context of naturalisation, certain periods of residence in the State are excluded. These include:

periods of residence in respect of which an applicant does not have permission to remain in the State;

periods granted for the purposes of study;

periods granted for the purposes of seeking recognition as a refugee within the meaning of the Refugee Act, 1996.

It is open to the person concerned to lodge a new application if and when she is in a position to satisfy the statutory requirements applicable at that time.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

171 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when it is expected to determine the residency application in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 22; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45887/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on the 30th March 2000. Her application was refused and a Deportation Order was made in respect of her on the 28th October 2003. The person concerned instituted Judicial Review proceedings on the 1st March 2004 challenging the decision to make a Deportation Order in respect of her. Her Leave application to apply for Judicial Review was granted on the 7th May 2004. These proceedings were determined on the 8th October 2008 in the High Court where the Court quashed the applicant's Deportation Order having adjudged that there had been an error in the consideration which led to the signing of that Order.

Arising from that High Court Judgement, the case of the person concerned falls to be considered anew pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended. As part of that process, a representative of my Department will be writing to the person concerned in the coming days to invite her to submit, within a specific timeframe, any representations which she would wish to have considered before a final decision is made in her case.

The Deputy can be assured that any such representations will be fully considered under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996, as amended on the prohibition of Refoulement, before the file is passed to me for a decision.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

172 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when it is expected that a residency or family reunification application in the name of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare will be concluded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45888/08]

I refer the Deputy to my previous answers to Questions Nos. 1213 and 131 put down for answer on 30th January 2008 and 9th October 2008 respectively.

I am informed by the Immigration Division of my Department that a Family Reunification application was received from the person referred to by the Deputy in May 2002 and that a decision was issued in January 2005. A review of that decision was carried out in 2005 and following the review the person in question was notified that the original decision was upheld.

A new application for Family Reunification was received from the person in question in December 2007. The application was forwarded to the Refugee Applications Commissioner for investigation as required under Section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996. The investigation has been completed and the Commissioner has forwarded a report to my Department.

The report will be considered by my Department and a decision on the application will issue in due course.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

173 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position in relation to an application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Louth; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45899/08]

I would refer the Deputy to the detailed Reply I gave to his recent Parliamentary Question, No. 135 of Thursday, 23 October 2008, in this matter.

The position in the State of the person concerned is as set out in that Reply.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

174 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when the residency process is expected to be concluded in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Meath; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45900/08]

I would refer the Deputy to the detailed Reply I gave to his recent Parliamentary Question, No. 113 of Thursday, 27 November 2008, in this matter.

The position in the State of the person concerned is as set out in that Reply.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

175 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected status in the application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45901/08]

The person referred to by the Deputy applied for asylum on 21 July 2008. The claim was assessed by the Refugee Applications Commissioner who concluded that the person concerned did not meet the criteria for recognition as a refugee. The Commissioner's recommendation was communicated to him by letter dated 15 August 2008. This communication advised the person of his entitlement to appeal the Commissioner's recommendation to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, which he duly did.

The Refugee Appeals Tribunal considered the person's appeal, following which the Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's earlier recommendation to reject his claim. The outcome of the appeal was made known to the applicant by letter dated 14 November 2008.

In accordance with normal procedures, the applicant's file was forwarded to my Department's Ministerial Decisions Unit for final processing of the asylum claim. A letter will issue to him from my Department formally advising him that his asylum claim has been rejected and affording him three options as follows:

1. Return home voluntarily

2. Consent to the making of a deportation order, or

3. Make written representations to me within 15 working days for temporary leave to remain in the State and/or make an application for subsidiary protection under the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (SI No. 518 of 2006)

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

176 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected status of the application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45902/08]

It is not the practice to comment in detail on individual asylum applications.

As the Deputy will be aware, applications for refugee status in the State are determined by an independent process comprising the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and the Refugee Appeals Tribunal which make recommendations to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform on whether such status should be granted.

A final decision on each application is made following receipt of the recommendation of the Refugee Applications Commissioner or the decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, as appropriate.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

177 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected status in the application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 8; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45903/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 27 September 1999. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 27 November 2002, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. Representations were received on his behalf. Following consideration of his case, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, a Deportation Order was signed in respect of the person concerned on 22 December 2004. Notice of this Order was served by registered letter dated 17 February 2005 requiring the person concerned to present himself to the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) on a specified date in order to make travel arrangements for his deportation from the State. The person concerned presented on the specified date as required and was given further presentation dates by the GNIB.

The person concerned, through his legal representative, requested the Minister to review the decision not to allow to him permission to remain temporarily in the State in view of new information which had come to hand. Following consideration of this new information the Deportation Order was affirmed and the legal representative of the person concerned was notified of this by letter.

The person concerned, again through his legal representative, subsequently submitted a request under Regulation 4 (2) of the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006) seeking the permission of the Minister to consider an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with those Regulations which came into force on 10 October 2006. Following consideration of the information submitted, the application was refused. The person concerned and his legal representative were notified of this decision by letter dated 21 November 2008. The person concerned was also required to present himself at the GNIB on Thursday 4 December 2008 in order to make travel arrangements for his removal from the State. He presented as required and is due to present again on 8 January 2009.

The effect of the Deportation Order is that the person concerned must leave the State and remain thereafter out of the State. The enforcement of the Deportation Order is an operational matter for the GNIB.

Asylum Applications.

Seán Barrett

Question:

178 Deputy Seán Barrett asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the status of an application from a person (details supplied) in Dublin 18 for leave to remain here on humanitarian grounds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45906/08]

The person concerned applied for asylum on 23 October 2003. His application was refused following consideration of his case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 12 July 2005, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State.

Representations have been submitted on behalf of the person concerned and these representations will be fully concerned, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, before the file is passed to me for decision.

Residency Permits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

179 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress to date in the matter of an application for residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45910/08]

I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Question No. 836 of Tuesday, 8 July 2008 and the written Reply to that Question.

The person concerned applied for asylum on 21 April 2006. Following investigation by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, it was established that the person concerned had previously made an asylum application in France and, as such, in accordance with the provisions of the Dublin II Regulations, it was determined that his asylum claim should be examined by the French authorities. This determination was upheld following an appeal to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Consequently, a Transfer Order was signed in respect of the person concerned, on 1 August 2006, obliging him to present himself at the Offices of the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB), on 22 August 2006, to make arrangements for his transfer to France. The person concerned ‘presented' as requested on this occasion and a flight was arranged for his formal transfer on 30 August 2006. However the person concerned ‘evaded' his transfer and thus became illegally present in this State. The person concerned continued to evade his transfer to France with the consequence that the Transfer Order expired and Ireland became responsible for processing his asylum application. At this point, in early 2008, the person concerned was admitted into the asylum process in this State. The person concerned was invited to attend for interview at the Offices of the Refugee Applications Commissioner on 21 January 2008 but failed to attend as required. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 (2) of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), the Refugee Applications Commissioner refused him a declaration of refugee status.

Based on the recommendation of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 11 June 2008, a copy of which was sent to his legal representative, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of him. He was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why he should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. In addition, he was notified of his entitlement to apply for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006). The person concerned did not respond to my Department's letter dated 11 June 2008.

The case file of the person concerned will now be considered under Section 3 (6) of Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. When this consideration has been completed, the file is passed to me for decision.

Human Rights Issues.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

180 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi; the initiatives taken by him or his European counterparts to secure her release; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45683/08]

Aung San Suu Kyi remains under house arrest following the decision of the military junta in Burma on 27 May to extend her detention for a further year.

At that time I condemned the decision of the Burmese authorities and called on them to rescind the order and to release her immediately. I said that her release would be a humanitarian gesture to a woman who has spent more than 12 of the last 18 years in detention without charge, and would provide real substance and significance to the regime's professed goal of a return to civilian democratic government in the country.

I have since repeated this call on a number of occasions, including in my address to the United Nations General Assembly on 29 September and most recently following the imposition on 11 November of prison sentences of up to 65 years on a number of respected political activists in Burma.

Ireland remains committed to helping the Burmese people in their struggle for justice, democracy and development. In pursuit of this goal, the Government has engaged in diplomatic activity at Ministerial and senior official level with Burma's neighbours and in international fora. I welcome in this regard the fact that the Asia-Europe (ASEM) Summit on 24/25 October, which was attended by the Taoiseach, adopted a very positive position on the Burmese situation. The support of countries in the Asia region is crucial to a resolution of the problems in Burma.

EU Foreign Ministers last discussed Burma at their meeting on 10 November. We called again for the lifting of restrictions placed on political parties in Burma and the early release of those under detention. We also stated our view that the elections scheduled in Burma for 2010 will have no credibility unless all political prisoners are released unconditionally, in particular Aung San Suu Kyi, and a political process is initiated with the support of the United Nations on the basis of an inclusive, long-term dialogue in which the opposition and ethnic groups can participate fully.

We also reaffirmed our firm and unconditional support for the UN Secretary-General's Mission of Good Offices and welcomed his renewed personal commitment to ending the current deadlock. In this context, I welcome the statement made by the Secretary General at a press conference on 5 December that he is ready to visit Burma whenever he can have reasonable expectations that his visit will be productive and meaningful.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

181 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45702/08]

I am fully committed to achieving the goals set out in the Action Plan for Better Regulation and believe that improvements in regulation can have a positive impact on the quality of engagement between the public and Government.

Most of the legislation brought forward by my Department does not impact significantly on the regulatory environment. Regulatory Impact Assessments are, however, carried out on appropriate legislation.

The cost of implementing and supporting Better Regulation is difficult to quantify in terms of staff numbers or specific budgets, as these obligations fall into much of the day to day work of a number of sections within my Department. The Departmental Co-ordination Unit, which has a staff of six, is responsible for the overall co-ordination of Better Regulation issues, among many other responsibilities. The Legal Division within my Department also has an important role to play in this area. The actual assessment of Regulatory Impact on a particular piece of legislation is carried out by the policy section bringing forward that legislation. There is no separate budget line maintained by my Department for Better Regulation.

Foreign Conflicts.

Charlie O'Connor

Question:

182 Deputy Charlie O’Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the contacts he is maintaining in a respect of the worsening situation in Zimbabwe; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45830/08]

The worsening situation in Zimbabwe is a cause of grave concern. For several years, the people of Zimbabwe have been the victims of state violence, economic chaos and the collapse of basic social services such as health and education. Most recently, due to the mismanagement of water and sewerage facilities, a major cholera epidemic has developed. With almost 14,000 cases of cholera reported since 1 August and nearly 600 deaths from the disease, the Zimbabwean health system has no resources to cope. In addition, as a result of drought, the disruption caused by violence and a lack of basic agricultural inputs which farmers can no longer afford, many Zimbabweans are facing a catastrophic food shortage. The UN believes that the number dependent on food aid will reach 5 million, more than half the population, in January 2009.

The international community is responding to these crises by supporting the UN and non-governmental organisations in work aimed at improving conditions for the Zimbabwean people. In response to the outbreak of cholera, the European Commission has allocated more than €9 million to the UN and NGOs active in Zimbabwe to support water and sanitation initiatives and the provision of essential medicines. In total the EU Commission has provided more than €500 million in direct support to the population of Zimbabwe since 2002. Ireland has contributed approximately €25 million in aid to the affected people in the period 2006 to 2008 (to date). In recent weeks, Irish Aid has contributed a further €500,000 to the UN in respect of humanitarian work in Zimbabwe, and €100,000 to Goal to support its work in response to the cholera outbreak.

Substantial political change is urgently needed to bring Zimbabwe back on to a path to stability, peace and economic growth. Despite the appalling violence against supporters of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) since the relatively free elections of March 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai has maintained his willingness to work with Zanu-PF in a unity government. However almost three months after the 15 September power-sharing deal was signed, there is little or no hope that a new unity government will be in place soon. The MDC can only represent the interests of Zimbabwe's people effectively in government if Zanu-PF honours its commitments under the power-sharing agreement. The refusal of Zanu-PF to allocate the two key Ministries which are most crucial for reform — Finance and Home Affairs –to the MDC is a clear demonstration of bad faith on the part of Robert Mugabe.

The failure of regional leaders to press Mugabe to take the necessary steps to make a unity government workable is extremely disappointing. While recent talks in South Africa between ZANU-PF and the MDC agreed on a constitutional amendment , it is clear that constitutional change will not be enough to allow a unity government to tackle the serious problems facing Zimbabwe if the political will is still lacking.

The Government continues to engage with our European partners in formulating a response to the current crisis in Zimbabwe. Earlier this week, I attended a meeting of the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC), which reiterated that the EU is ready to support economic and social recovery in Zimbabwe once a government reflecting the will of the Zimbabwean people is formed, and demonstrates its respect for human rights and the rule of law and its willingness to take meaningful steps towards macroeconomic stabilisation. The Council also updated the list of persons subject to EU restrictive measures by adding the names of additional persons actively engaged in violence or human rights infringements in Zimbabwe.

Ireland has also conveyed our concerns about the situation in Zimbabwe directly to our partner countries in Africa through bilateral contacts. The countries of the southern Africa region, as well as organisations such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the African Union (AU), have a key role to play in encouraging the two sides in Zimbabwe to come to a workable agreement which reflects the democratic verdict of the Zimbabwean people, and Ireland has emphasised this point to them. Our Ambassadors in SADC countries have conveyed our concerns directly to the governments of our partner countries in southern Africa. The Irish Ambassador to Zimbabwe, who is based in Pretoria, has communicated Ireland's strong views to the Zimbabwean Ambassador there. In addition, African embassies based in Dublin have been informed of Ireland's position.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

183 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45853/08]

The Department of Foreign Affairs is responsible for two Votes — Vote 28 (Foreign Affairs) and Vote 29 (International Cooperation). The following tables set out the names of consultants used by the Department in 2007 and 2008 (to date) for the preparation of reports and the costs arising in each case. It should be noted that work is ongoing in relation to some of the reports listed for 2008 and that final payments may not be made until 2009.

I am very conscious of the need to achieve value for money on consultancy expenditure. The Department commissions consultancies only where specialised knowledge and/or skills are not available within the Department and, particularly in the case of Irish Aid (Ireland's official development assistance programme), where an independent evaluation of programmes and projects is required. Given the overall scale of the Irish Aid Programme, this level of monitoring, review and evaluation is both prudent and proportionate.

The information requested by the Deputy for Vote 28 is set out below.

Vote 28 (Foreign Affairs)

Consultants engaged in 2007

Matter Reported On

Costs 2007

Sysnet Limited

ICT Security Review

28,133

Goodbody Economic Consultants

Value for Money and Policy Review of the Support for Irish Emigrant Groups Programmes

25,894

Annesley Resource Partnership

Quality Assurance Assessment of the Value for Money and Policy Review of the Support for Irish Emigrants Groups Programmes

3,751

BCT Communications Limited

Evaluation of the capacity building programmes provided by the Institute of Public Administration in 2006 to the Bulgarian Institute of Public Administration and the Romanian National Institute of Administration.

20,469

Mr. Richard Townsend

Assist with a review of the mandate and structures of the Ireland-United Nations Association (IUNA)

3,993

Consultants engaged in 2008

Matter Reported On

Costs 2008

Millward Brown

Research Project to establish reasons underlying the result of the Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

138,061

Communications Clinic

The preparation of a detailed Communication Action Plan to be used to direct spending under the Department’s Communicating Europe Initiative (CEI) in 2009.

48,000 — some of this amount will be paid in 2009)

The information requested by the Deputy for Vote 29 is set out below

Vote 29 (International Cooperation)

Consultant

Matter Reported On

Costs 2007

Annesley Resource Partnership

Quality Review of Irish Aid Report re. Tsunami

2,723

Annesley Resource Partnership

Review of the Irish Aid Fellowship Training Programme

34,388

Aodh O’Connor

Technical Consultants to the Civil Society Section Funding Schemes

9,800

Dalberg Global Development Ad.

Evaluation of Learning and Training Programme for Development Workers (Dtalk)

26,245

Dalberg Global Development Ad.

Mapping of Irish Aid Approval Processes

55,358

Debbie Thomas

Production of publication material for communication about Irish Aid’s health programming

10,000

Ecorys Research and Consulting

Evaluation of the Mozambique Country Programmes 2001-2006

93,191

Farrell Grant Sparks

Provision of Consultancy Services for Irish Aid Management Review

92,767

Institute of Public Administration

Quality Assessment of Mozambique CSP Evaluation

2,904

Intrac

Public Expenditure Review of the Irish Govenments Support to Tsunami affected countries

31,181

Intrac

Review of the Irish Missionary Resource Service (IMRS)

66,105

Jane Salvage

Support to the AMAR Health Rehabilitation Project for the Marsh Arabs of Southern Iraq

12,135

John Grindle

External Evaluator for Development Cooperation Ireland Project Proposals for the Balkans and CISs

8,500

John Grindle

Support to Review of the Staffing Needs of the Diplomatic Missions in Programme Countries, Sierra Leone and South Africa

15,426

KPMG

Value for Money Review of the Passport Service

35,406

Maeve Martin

Evaluation of the Development and Intercultural Education (DICE) Project

15,000

Mary Jennings

Mainstreaming Building Strategy and Practice within Irish Aid

3,020

Oxford Policy Management

Strategic review of Irish Aid engagement with the United Nations funds and programmes

61,316

Reginald Terrence Allsop

Support to the Zambia/Ireland Teacher Education Initiative

21,960

Richard Townsend

Report on staffing needs of missions in Irish Aid Programme Countries

8,556

Karen Rothwell

Piloting of Organisational Assessment Guidelines

24,421

Siobhan Mullally

Independent/External Mid-term Evaluation of the Justice System Programme in Timor Leste

5,197

Steve Packer

Evaluation of the Irish Aid World Bank Education Trust Fund

23,001

Theta Eta Advisors Limited

Preparation of a report entitled: Best Practice in the Governance of Aid Programmes

6,050

Oxford Policy Management

Research study entitled: “Measuring Impact: The Global and Irish Aid Programme Context”

42,258

Mr Tony Killick

(i) Preparation of a report entitled: “Selectivity in Action: Choosing Irish Aid’s Tenth Programme Country”

25,410

(ii) Editorial Work on Research Findings Volume 1 Governance Trade and Aid Effectiveness.

Overseas Development Institute

Research study entitled: “Good Governance, Aid Modalities & Poverty reduction”

141,284

Consultant

Matter Reported On

Costs 2008

Farrell Grant Sparks

Irish Aid Management Review

157,300

ITAD Ltd

Joint Evaluation of Timor Leste

129,711

Copenhagen DC A/S

Primary Education Evaluation in Uganda

108,397

Farrell Grant Sparks

HIV/AIDS Value for Money

144,888

Fitzpatrick Associates

Support for Kimmage Development Studies

50,820

Patrick D. Murphy

Evaluation of Global eSchools and Communities Initiative (GeSCI).

45,189

Oxford Policy Management

Hunger Task Force

39,613

Catherine A. Butcher

Development of Guidelines for HIV and AIDS Partnership Scheme (HAPS)

66,876

Economics for the Environment

Irish Aid Strategic Partnerships

34,647

Fitzpatrick Associates

Evaluation of Traidlinks

34,091

KPMG

Value for Money Report on Irish Passport Service

35,979

Annesley Resource Partnership

Review of Fellowship Training

20,458

Barry Ryan

Review of Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and Partnership Programme for Europe and Central Asia (PPECA).

12,551

Dalberg Global Development

Mapping of Approval Processes

10,465

Fitzpatrick Associates

How the lessons of Ireland’s economic and social development can be formulated for delivery as part of Ireland’s cooperation programme in SE Asia

7,260

Cathy Gaynor

Preparation of Country Strategy Papers Guidelines and Procedures

25,816

Cathy Gaynor

Mainstreaming: Building Strategy and Practice within Irish Aid.

48,141

Dalberg Global Development

Evaluation of Learning and Training Programme for Development Workers (Dtalk)

23,753

Integra Economic Development Consultants

Report to Inter-Departmental Committee on Development (IDCD) on development of skill sets.

22,143

The IDL Group Ltd

Review of Irish Aid Zimbabwe Programme

3,937

Siobhan Mullally

Evaluation UNDP Support Programme

10,115

Richard Townsend

Report on Staffing needs of Missions in Irish Aid Programme Countries, South Africa and Sierra Leone

4,096

Petrus Consulting Ltd

Quality Review of draft HIV and AIDS VFM Report.

3,086

Maura Leen

Programme of Strategic Co-operation between Irish Aid and Higher Education and Research Institutes

5,000

Mary Jennings

Mainstreaming: Building Strategy and Practice within Irish Aid.

28,910

Kate Dyer

Revision of Irish Aid’s Country Strategy Planning Guidelines and Procedures

40,273

Jim O’Leary

Assessment of Value for Money Review of the Passport Service.

6,000

Jane Salvage

Feedback on evaluation of Irish Aids support to the AMAR Health Rehabilitation Project for Marsh Arabs of Southern Iraq

2068

Mr Tony Killick

Research for the Advisory Board on Irish Aid on Irish Aid Programme Countries

4,200

Oxford Policy Management

Research report entitled: “Measuring Impact: The Global and Irish Aid Programme Context”

11,150

Overseas Development Institute

Research study entitled: “Good Governance, Aid Modalities & Poverty reduction”

4,520

Alan FitzGibbon

Research report on “Private Sector Development.”

13,800

Brendan Riordan

Research report on “Biofuels.”

6,955

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

184 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45694/08]

The Department actively contributes to ongoing initiatives within the Civil and Public Service to regulate better, as set out in the Government's White Paper ‘Regulating Better', which enunciates key principles of better regulation. This contribution includes liaison with the Department of the Taoiseach, as required, as well as participation on a range of inter-departmental groups, including the Regulatory Impact Analysis Network chaired by the Department of the Taoiseach and the Group on Administrative Burden Reduction chaired by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.

However, within its ambit, the Department has very much a ‘light' regulatory role, so its contribution is correspondingly proportioned. In whole time equivalent terms, only a small portion of an Assistant Principal's time is taken up with this work and the financial resources are also correspondingly small. Because it is not a key regulator, the Department is not represented on the Better Regulation Group.

Swimming Pool Projects.

Ulick Burke

Question:

185 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if he will confirm that an allocation of finance has been ring fenced for the provision of a swimming pool in Loughrea, County Galway; the reason the State Solicitor’s Office has delayed processing and sanctioning the agreement with the parties involved, namely Galway County Council, Loughrea Pool Committee, his Department and a private partnership; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45725/08]

My Department has been in discussions now for a number of years with Galway County Council regarding the grant aiding of a swimming pool in Loughrea. The current proposal is that Galway County Council would supply a site to a local hotel developer who would construct the pool and in return would make the pool available to the public in Loughrea for an agreed number of hours per week and at entrance prices comparable to other public pools in Galway. As part of this plan the Council applied to my Department for a grant of €1.7m from the Local Authority Swimming Pool Programme towards the construction of the pool.

In this regard a meeting took place in July 2008 between representatives of my Department, Galway County Council, the Chief State Solicitor's Office and the Office of the Attorney General to discuss certain legal aspects of the project. The Office of the Attorney General was subsequently asked to advise on a number of legal issues raised at the meeting.

Having considered the legal advice of the Office of the Attorney General, my Department has decided that it cannot now recommend the granting of aid of €1.7m to Galway County Council for the construction of a swimming pool at Loughrea under the current contractual arrangements. My Department had requested Galway County Council to consider this matter further and revert as soon as possible as to how it wishes to proceed. A reply from Galway County Council has recently been received and is now being considered by my Department.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

186 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45845/08]

The information requested by the Deputy is set out in the table below:

Consultants

Cost

Report

Report Date

Séan Cromien

8,800

Review of operation of the Heritage Fund Leading to revised updating legislation

Sep 2007

CHL Consulting

17,000

Progress on implementation of James Joyce Centre Business Plan

Nov 2007

Indecon International Economic Consultants

114,000

Economic Evaluation of the Benefits to Ireland of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games

Feb 2008

Raymond Burke

3,267

Evaluation of Irish Sports Council Value for Money and Policy Review

Aug 2008

Raymond Burke

3,354

Independent evaluation of the Local Authority Swimming Pool Programme Expenditure Review as part of a Value for Money Report conducted by Department

Sep 2008

DKM Economic Consultants

3,146

Consultancy on the Update of the Cost Benefit Analysis for the National Museum at Collins Barracks — Report written by Department

Oct 2008

Holohan Leisure

113,740

Analysis of the Sports Facility Provision in Ireland

Oct 2008

Mr. John Travers

15,660

Chair of the Tourism Strategy Implementation Group, which produced the Report

Dec 2008

Farrell Grant Sparks

19,465

Review of the Horse and Greyhound Racing Fund.

Not yet Completed

This Department observes the Department of Finance Guidelines for Engagement of Consultants in the Civil Service. Consultants are only employed by the Department in circumstances where specialised knowledge or expertise, which is not available in the Department or elsewhere in the public service, is required for a temporary period or a specialist study/project must be completed within a very short time scale.

Community Development.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

187 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the estimate of the value of additional public investment in a town (details supplied) in County Kildare arising specifically from that town’s inclusion in the RAPID programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45681/08]

The RAPID Programme aims to ensure that priority attention is given to tackling the spatial concentration of poverty and social exclusion within 46 designated RAPID areas nationally. As I have indicated to the House on a number of occasions, it is a matter for individual Departments to report progress with their projects under the RAPID programme. However, I am advised through the mechanism of the RAPID National Monitoring Committee that over €23 million in local and national investment has been invested in the Athy RAPID area as a result of that area's inclusion in the RAPID Programme.

With respect to my own Department, I initiated the RAPID leverage schemes in 2004 in order to support small-scale projects identified locally by the Area Implementation Teams in each of the RAPID areas. These schemes are co-funded by the relevant agencies and fund projects that focus on estate enhancement, graffiti removal, traffic calming, community closed-circuit television, health and sports facilities, and the provision of playgrounds and multi-use games areas. These schemes are subject to ongoing review to ensure that they remain responsive to the demands of the RAPID communities. Where opportunities arise, the eligibility of individual schemes can be extended to reflect emerging needs identified by the Area Implementation Teams in each of the RAPID areas.

Allocations under the RAPID Leverage Schemes and the RAPID Dormant Accounts Additionality Fund to Athy total €1,082,874 to date. A detailed breakdown by Scheme is given in the table below.

Breakdown of RAPID Leverage and Dormant Accounts Additionality funding to Athy

Scheme

Amount

Community CCTV Scheme

35,726

Health Sector Co-fund

33,273

Local Authority Housing Estate Enhancement Scheme

110,000

Playgrounds Grants Scheme

257,430

Sports Capital Top-Up Scheme

259,050

Traffic Measures

62,395

Dormant Accounts Additionality Fund

325,000

Total

1,082,874

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

188 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the number of staff in terms of whole-time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the better regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45696/08]

I can confirm to the Deputy that my Department is supportive of the work of the Better Regulation Group.

One officer at Assistant Principal level working in the Corporate Governance Division of my Department has been assigned responsibility for progressing work in this regard, including actions outlined in the White Paper on Better Regulation. This officer represents my Department at the RIA Network. The work in relation to Better Regulation represents approximately one eighth of this officer's work and the associated salary costs are €8,270 per annum. It is envisaged that the costs arising in 2009 will be of a similar order.

Departmental Contracts.

Kathleen Lynch

Question:

189 Deputy Kathleen Lynch asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if he has received complaints regarding the way in which a company (details supplied) in the Gaeltacht, which received funding from his Department is operating; if he is satisfied with the corporate governance of the company; if he has initiated an inquiry into the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45720/08]

The Group in question is a private company limited by guarantee. Although such companies may be contracted to deliver a number of programmes on behalf of my Department, my Department has no role to play in the management and/or staffing of the company.

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

James Bannon

Question:

190 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the measures, in view of the suspension of CLÁR funding water and sewerage schemes for 2008, he is planning for 2009; if these will include the proceeding of schemes on hand; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45812/08]

As the Deputy is aware one of the more successful aspects of the CLÁR programme has been the level of funding provided to the various Water and Sewerage measures over the years. Funding approved under those measures has risen from approximately €2.4m in 2002 to more than €16m in 2008. In total over €45m has been approved to date for water and sewerage schemes since the programme was launched in 2001.

I am reviewing the resources allocated to and the impact of the various individual schemes under the CLÁR programme. All eligible applications on hand in the Department at the date the scheme closed have been processed and funding approved where appropriate. In relation to accepting new applications for water and sewerage schemes, consideration will be given to re-opening a revised measure for Water and Sewerage schemes in 2009.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

191 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45847/08]

My Department has made available on its website details regarding consultancies (excepting those of minor value, i.e., less than €5,000 excluding VAT) from June 2002 to the end of October 2008. The link in relation to expenditure on consultancies by my Department is: www.pobail.ie/en/CorporateSupportServices/Finance/Consultancies.

I am also arranging to have the information sought by the Deputy for the years 2007 and 2008 forwarded to her at her e-mail address in the Oireachtas.

Departmenal Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

192 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of staff in terms of whole-time equivalents she has allocated within her Department to support the better regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45705/08]

The Department of Social and Family Affairs did not have a representative on the High Level Group on Business Regulation.

The Department contributes to the reduction of the administrative burden on business by the participation of a Principal Officer on the relevant Inter-Departmental Group chaired by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.

A process has commenced, in the Department, to measure the administrative cost to business of regulatory provisions in social welfare legislation with a view to contributing to the achievement of the Government target to reduce these burdens by 25% by 2012.

The Programme Evaluation Unit in the Department supports the work of the Regulatory Impact Assessment network through participation by an Assistant Principal and Administrative Officer. Meetings of the network, chaired by the Department of the Taoiseach, take place three or four times per year. The Programme Evaluation Unit also supports the implementation of Regulatory Impact Analysis in the Department.

No specific budget has been allocated in the Department to the reduction of the administrative burden on business.

Social Welfare Benefits.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Question:

193 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason for the denial of an exceptional needs payment to a person (details supplied) in County Carlow. [45718/08]

Under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which is administered on behalf of the Department by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive, an exceptional needs payment (ENP) may be made to help meet an essential, once-off cost which the applicant is unable to meet out of his/her own resources. There is no automatic entitlement to this payment. Each application is determined by the Executive based on the particular circumstances of the case.

The Executive has advised that the person concerned has been refused an exceptional needs payment in respect of clothing as she was deemed to have sufficient income to meet her clothing needs. It is open to the person concerned to appeal against the decision of the community welfare officer to the Executive's designated Appeals Office.

Michael Ring

Question:

194 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason there is a need for a social welfare officer to call again to a person (details supplied) in County Galway when in fact all information has been provided and is with her Department. [45732/08]

The review of the one-parent family payment claim of the person concerned is ongoing. The Social Welfare Inspector has been in contact with her and has made arrangements to meet with her shortly to clarify certain aspects of her circumstances. When the inspector's enquiries are complete, a decision will be made as soon as possible and the person concerned will be notified of the outcome.

Under Social Welfare legislation decisions in relation to claims must be made by Deciding Officers and Appeals Officers. These officers are statutorily appointed and I have no role in regard to making such decisions.

Michael Ring

Question:

195 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be approved and awarded the one-parent family payment. [45735/08]

A Social Welfare Inspector's investigation of the circumstances of the person concerned has been completed. A decision will be given in her case as soon as possible and she will be notified of the outcome.

Under Social Welfare legislation decisions in relation to claims must be made by Deciding Officers and Appeals Officers. These officers are statutorily appointed and I have no role in regard to making such decisions.

Money Advice and Budgeting Service.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

196 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if she will provide MABSIS data up to the end of November 2008 for each Money Advice and Budgeting Service centre in respect of the number of new clients, the number of new clients earning a wage, the number of new clients with a mortgage and the total and average debt owed by new clients when they first presented to MABS. [45745/08]

The Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS) provided services to 15,647 new clients in the period to end November 2008. In addition, 2,303 people sought information about budgeting and money management. The MABS National Helpline, received 9,990 calls to date in 2008 and some 11,500 calls since its launch in October 2007.

The detailed statistical breakdown of clients per centre requested by the Deputy is not readily available from the MABSIS. However the national MABS statistics show that the majority of clients were on social welfare payments (59%), the highest numbers being 2,726 (17%) who were in receipt of the one parent family payment, 2,790 (18%) who were in receipt of jobseekers payments and 2,149 (14%) in receipt of illness/disability payments. Some 28% of clients were in receipt of wages and 3% were self-employed.

Clients mostly lived in rented accommodation, with 26% living in private rented accommodation and 24% in rented local authority accommodation. People with mortgages made up 27% of new clients and 7% lived with parents.

The total owed by new clients in 2008 to creditors, based on the debt they had when they first came to the MABS, amounted to €189 million, which works out at an average amount of €12,100 debt per client. Of the total amount of debt 64% was owed to banks/financial institutions, 16% was owed to credit unions, 3% was owed in respect of utilities bills and 1% was owed to moneylenders.

Information on new clients per MABS company up to the end of September 2008 is detailed in the following table.

Money Advice and Budgeting Service — New Clients

Company

New Clients to 31st December 2007

New clients to 30th September 2008

Arklow

183

199

Athlone

140

130

Ballymun

457

416

Blanchardstown

394

332

Bray

379

439

Carlow

698

426

Cavan

230

146

Charleville

83

86

Clare

224

220

Clondalkin

252

239

COMAC

246

310

Cork

596

780

North Cork

224

275

West Cork

221

222

North Donegal

236

210

South Donegal

49

64

West Donegal

27

13

Drogheda

158

99

Dublin 12 Area

232

200

Dublin North City

380

199

Dublin North East

308

294

Dublin South East

155

158

Dundalk

134

135

Dundrum/Rathfarnham

203

236

Dun Laoghaire

290

325

Fingal

219

163

Finglas

432

353

North Galway

256

257

South Galway

486

456

Kerry

520

514

Kildare

376

342

Kilkenny

274

265

Laois

271

319

Leitrim

87

94

Liffey South West

303

223

Limerick

185

468

Longford

106

113

North Mayo

113

85

South Mayo

158

166

Meath

172

133

Monaghan

77

61

Mullingar

174

134

Offaly

147

172

Roscommon

96

108

Sligo

131

165

Tallaght

332

321

North Tipperary

166

155

South Tipperary

357

425

Waterford

443

453

West Waterford

98

94

Wexford

256

234

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

197 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if she will provide this information in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45856/08]

The Department has engaged consultancy expertise in 2007 and 2008 to support it in undertaking strategic reviews (e.g. review of the Social Insurance Fund and the equality review of the Social Welfare Code) and to provide specialist technical expertise in the application of information technology.

Details of the consultants engaged to undertake strategic reviews and reports in each of these years along with the amount of money paid in the particular year are set out in the Appendix. The 2008 table covers the period 01/01/2008 to 31/10/2008 inclusive and includes consultancies ongoing at 31/10/2008 where reports have not yet been finalised.

Details of consultancy contracts for 2007 in Department of Social and Family Affairs

Project

Name of Consultancy Firm

Spend in 2007

Microsoft Windows Active Directory (AD) strategy

Hewlett Packard Ireland Ltd

58,962

Report on Charges on Supplementary Pension arrangements and Standard PRSAs (Personal Retirement Savings Accounts)

Technical Guidance Ltd

5,748

Review of the sustainability of the Social Insurance Fund

Mercer Human Resource Consulting

199,650

Study to identify viable possible social housing solutions to meet needs of those who are dependent on long-term rent supplementation

Goodbody Economic Consultants

36,784

Information Communications Technology (ICT) strategy report

Steve Wylie (Independent ICT Consultant)

24,200

Technical review of the social welfare code to examine its compatibility with the Equal Stats Act 2000

Mel Cousins and Associates

73,871

Examination of the Cost Of Healthy Eating and Specialised Diets for a Single Individual in Ireland

Dr. Muireann Cullen

5,850

Research Studies — Thematic Review on reforming Disability Benefit

OECD

70,000

Review of Management Advisory Committee

Prospectus

6,624

Family Patterns and Trends Report

UCD

5,227

Report on Economic Implications of Demographic Change

Goodbody Economic Consultants

20,086

Report on Trusteeship and Proposed Regulation of Scheme Administrators’

Technical Guidance Ltd

5,203

Report on Health & Safety Management Programme

NTTX Ltd

43,560

Personnel Investigations

Polaris

9,623

Accessibility Consultancy Services

National Council for the Blind

2,500

Peer Review

Edmond Cussen

1,800

Details of consultancy contracts for 2008 in Department of Social and Family Affairs

Project

Name of Consultancy Firm

Spend in 2008 (to 31/10/08)

Technical review of the social welfare code to examine its compatibility with the Equal Stats Act 2000 (continued from 2007 and due to be completed by end 2008)

Mel Cousins & Associates

98,494

Family Income Supplement — Uptake Research Project (Project ongoing)

Millward Brown IMS

32,670

Strategic Review of Client Eligibility Services (Project ongoing)

Accenture

203,054

Strategic Review of Customer Facing Services (Project ongoing)

Grant Thornton

92,565

Report on Auto Enrolment Scheme Impact

Technical Guidance Ltd

3,448

National Employment Action Plan (NEAP) Evaluation (Project ongoing)

ESRI

51,847

Social Welfare Benefits.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

198 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position in regard to the payment of supplementary welfare allowance in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45876/08]

The supplementary welfare allowance scheme is administered on behalf of the Department by the community welfare division of the Health Service Executive (HSE).

The Executive has advised that the person concerned is in receipt of basic Supplementary Welfare Allowance but has been asked to provide documentation to the Community Welfare Officer. This documentation has not been provided to date. The person concerned has been advised in correspondence which issued on 27 November 2008 that payment of basic supplementary welfare allowance will be suspended if the requested documentation has not been provided within a specified period.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

199 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason an unemployment benefit claim and rent allowance has been refused in the case of a person (details supplied) Dublin 8; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45877/08]

The person concerned made an application for Jobseeker's Allowance on 21 April 2008. Following a full investigation, the application was disallowed by a Deciding Officer on the grounds that the person concerned failed to establish that he was genuinely seeking employment. The person concerned appealed the decision of the Deciding Officer and an appeal was forwarded to the Social Welfare Appeals Office. The appeal was disallowed on the basis that the person concerned had not made sustained and concentrated efforts to obtain employment.

The person concerned was in receipt of Supplementary Welfare Allowance (SWA) and Rent Supplement while his Jobseeker's Allowance claim was pending. In August 2008 he was asked by the Community Welfare Officer to provide evidence of his efforts to obtain employment. No evidence was produced by the person concerned and he stated that he was a student in full-time education. Payment of SWA and Rent Supplement was terminated on the basis that students in full-time education are excluded from receiving assistance under the Supplementary Welfare Allowance Scheme.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

200 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the position in regard to payment of carer's allowance in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [45878/08]

The claim for carer's allowance, by the person concerned, was refused by a Deciding Officer of the Department on 21 October 2008 on the grounds that the care recipient was not so invalided or disabled as to need full-time care and attention.

An appeal was opened on 25 November 2008 and I am advised by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that, in accordance with statutory requirements, the Department was asked for the documentation in the case and the Deciding Officer's comments on the grounds of the appeal.

On receipt of the Department's response the case will be referred to an Appeals Officer for early consideration.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office is an office of the Department that is independently responsible for determining appeals against decisions on social welfare entitlements.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

201 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Defence the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45697/08]

My Department operates a Legislation Branch to drive and implement the legislative reform programme within the Department. As part of that role my Department is represented by staff of the Legislation Branch on the RIA Network and the Inter-departmental Committee on Reducing the Administrative Burden. These areas of work represent a portion of the overall work of the Legislation Branch and costs for the branch are not measured to capture individual segments of work within that branch.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

202 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Defence the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45848/08]

The information sought by the Deputy is set out in the table.

Year

Name of Consultancy firm

Detail

Cost

2007

Petrus Consulting

Carried out Independent Quality Assessment of VFM Review of Clothing Procurement in the Defence Forces. The Report was received in August 2007.

2,904.00

2008

PA Consultant Group

To make recommendations on the best means of meeting the medical requirements of the Defence Forces. Value of contract is €95,000. (Amount paid to date is €60,138.09). The Report is expected to be delivered before the end of the year.

60,138.09

2008

Entograph

Carried out a study to review and evaluate options for bracken control in the Glen of Imaal and identify a plan for its control. The Report was received in April 2008.

30,129.00

2008

Dr. Eileen Doyle

To act as external expert and to chair the Independent Monitoring Group to review progress made by the PDF since the publication in 2004 of the report ‘Response to the Challenge of a Workplace”. The Report will be formally launched on 17 December 2008.

37,109.12

2008

FGS Consulting

VFM Review of Military Training Lands. (Two stage payments made to date of €24,200 and €36,300, total value of contract €90,000 incl. VAT). Final Report is due early in 2009.

60,500.00

2008

BMT Defence Services Ltd, UK

Consultants engaged in relation to the Naval Vessel Replacement Programme. The Report was received in July 2008.

45,643.38

2008

Mott Mac Donald Ltd

To carry out a review of the Safety Policy at Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel. Value of contract is €50,000. (Amount paid to date is €37,500). The Report is expected within the next two weeks.

37,500.00

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

203 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the level of investment made by his Department in infrastructural programmes in County Kildare during 2008 under the serviced land initiative; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45682/08]

To date this year my Department has recouped €620,000 to Kildare County Council under the Serviced Land Initiative measure of the Water Services Investment Programme.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

204 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation Group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45700/08]

Better Regulation, in general, forms an important part of the Government's drive for greater economic competitiveness and modernisation of the public service. In particular, the principles of better regulation underpin my Department's extensive policy and legislative programmes and is an integral part of the work of all staff engaged in such work. As such, there is no specific budget applied to the Department's activity in this area. In addition, my Department is represented on a number of different cross-Departmental groups associated with aspects of the better regulation agenda. The Department is represented at Assistant Principal level on the RIA Network, chaired by the Department of the Taoiseach to share and develop best practice in relation to the conduct of Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIA) across Government Departments. The network meets a number of times a year and was extensively involved in the central review of RIA published in July 2008.

On foot of the Government Decision in March 2008 which set a target of 25% reduction in administrative burdens on business arising from domestic regulations, my Department is also represented at Principal Officer level on an inter-departmental senior officials group, established by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment in July 2008, to drive and co-ordinate the identification, measurement and reduction in such burdens. My Department is working towards the cross-Departmental target date of end-2009 for the identification and prioritisation of information obligations on business, which are within the remit of my Department, and to have the appropriate measurement process in place for the calculation of savings to business. In accordance with the Government Decision, the intention is to effect all such savings by end-2012.

My Department is also represented at Assistant Secretary level on the cross-Departmental High Level Group on Business Regulation, chaired by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, which is tasked with taking concrete measures to reduce administrative burdens in five specific regulatory areas (including the environment), based primarily on suggestions put forward by the business sector. The Report of the High Level Group was published in July 2008. It identified both cost savings already achieved for business as a result of changes to administrative procedures and those that should accrue as a result of changes made, including in relation to waste collection permits.

At an EU level, the Spring European Council agreed at its meeting in March 2007 that reducing administrative burdens was an important measure for boosting Europe's economy, especially through its impact on SMEs. The Council agreed therefore that administrative burdens arising from EU legislation should be reduced by 25% by 2012. My Department has been working with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment in contributing to this project as appropriate.

Urban Renewal Schemes.

P. J. Sheehan

Question:

205 Deputy P. J. Sheehan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the improvements implemented in the Ballymun regeneration project, Dublin, involving the issues raised by the Comptroller and Auditor General in his value for money report and the hearings of the Committee of Public Accounts; the lessons learnt from same; the procedures changed and the savings achieved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45719/08]

The recommendations arising from the Comptroller and Auditor General's Special Report on Ballymun Regeneration cover a broad range of issues, from relatively minor changes in administrative practices, which are now being implemented, to major recommendations that relate to the social and economic fundamentals of the regeneration programme over the medium to long term. My Department is actively working with Ballymun Regeneration Ltd and the local authorities involved to ensure that the recommendations of the Comptroller and Auditor General are fully responded to in the context of the continuing regeneration of the Ballymun area, with particular focus on achieving best value for money. Also, in the context of the regeneration programme nationally, my Department has already taken action to ensure that all future regeneration proposals are developed against the backdrop of the lessons learned from the Ballymun regeneration experience.

Turbary Rights.

Michael D. Higgins

Question:

206 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will specify the kinds of equipment it is permitted to use when cutting turf; if it remains the case that while use of the sausage machine is illegal, it is permitted to use the hopper machine; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45731/08]

A small proportion of Ireland's peatland is designated for conservation purposes under the Habitats Directive or the Wildlife Acts. Landowners and holders of turbary rights on bogs within Special Areas of Conservation or Natural Heritage Areas can currently cut turf for their own domestic use. Since 1999, the use of "sausage" machines has not been permitted in these areas. However, "hoppers", or other hand-held machines, have been permitted. There are fewer restrictions on undesignated bogs. Large-scale peat extraction works may require planning permission, with an associated environmental impact assessment, under the planning code.

Departmental Expenditure.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

207 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the way emoluments to adjudicators or mediators are legislated for under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 in regard to the Private Residential Tenancies Board; if such persons are employees of the PRTB; if they are paid on a by case basis or if they are paid per diem; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45755/08]

Under section 164 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004, the Private Residential Tenancies Board (PRTB) may appoint adjudicators and mediators for the purposes of its dispute resolution functions. Section 164 also provides that the fees and expenses paid to adjudicators and mediators are such as the PRTB may determine, with the consent of the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the Minister for Finance. Adjudicators and mediators are not employees of the PRTB; they are paid a flat daily fee.

Joan Burton

Question:

208 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of electronic voting machines being stored in south Tipperary; the storage costs to date; the projected future storage costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45820/08]

No electronic voting machines are stored in South Tipperary and there are no proposals for such storage in future. In November 2007, the electronic voting machines previously stored at a premises in Clonmel, County Tipperary in respect of both North and South Tipperary were moved to a central storage facility located at Gormanston Army Camp. Based on information received in my Department from the Returning Officer, the total costs for storage of the electronic voting equipment (including the cost of insurance, service charges, rates, heating, etc.) in respect of the storage arrangements in Tipperary are set out in the following table:

Annual Storage Costs (incl. VAT)

Annual Storage Costs (incl. VAT)

Annual Storage Costs (incl. VAT)

Annual Storage Costs (incl. VAT)

Annual Storage Costs (incl. VAT)

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Tipperary (N&S)

42,700.00

42,700.00

31,200.00

39,196.00

2,592.00

Departmental Agencies.

Michael Ring

Question:

209 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he is satisfied that the legislation established (details supplied) is sufficient for the quick resolution of disputes. [45833/08]

Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004, one of the functions assigned to the Private Residential Tenancies Board (PRTB) is to review the operation of the Act and to make recommendations to the Minister for its amendment, where necessary. The PRTB has recently completed an examination of the Act and, informed by four years of experience, has made a number of recommendations for legislative change. These recommendations are currently under consideration and I will be aiming to ensure that any amendments considered appropriate are brought forward in the context of the passage of the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008 through the Oireachtas.

Michael Ring

Question:

210 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if a new corporate plan has been developed by an agency (details supplied) to optimise all aspects of their work including the disputes resolution service. [45834/08]

I understand that the agency concerned is at an advanced stage of preparing its Corporate Plan for the 2009 to 2011 period and this will be finalised shortly.

Alternative Energy Projects.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

211 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of submissions received on the draft proposals for phasing out energy inefficient light bulbs; the next steps to be taken on foot of the draft proposals and any submissions; when it is intended to notify draft regulations to the European Commission; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45842/08]

Over 200 submissions have been received in response to the public consultation document on the proposed energy efficiency and performance standard for light bulbs. A summary of these responses will be published on my Department's website in due course. Arrangements are underway to secure the necessary EU clearance to the introduction of the proposed standard in Ireland. These arrangements involve detailed and formal notification procedures which have been initiated, and are being followed by Ireland and the European Commission. A decision on the notification is awaited.

Wildlife Protection.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

212 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps taken by his Department on foot of spraying of road side verges at the N52, N51 and parts of the M3 in May 2008 with the pesticide 2,4-D; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45843/08]

Under Section 40 of the Wildlife Acts, the cutting, grubbing, burning or destruction by other means of vegetation growing on uncultivated land or in hedges or ditches is prohibited during the nesting and breeding season for birds and wildlife, from 1 March to 31 August. This is subject to certain specific exceptions. In most instances, it is required by law that work to hedgerows is carried out outside this period. However, it is accepted that in some cases, trimming may be necessary, during the prohibited period, on grounds of public health and safety, notably when new road hazards are detected that require hedge trimming or vegetation clearance. Local authorities and relevant public bodies are reminded annually of their responsibilities in this regard.

I was seriously concerned in relation to the spraying of road verges in May 2008 by Meath County Council. My Department's National Parks and Wildlife Service has initiated a prosecution under the Wildlife Acts against both Meath County Council and the Company which carried out the spraying for the Council, and I understand that a date for the hearing of the case will be set in March, 2009.

On foot of the County Meath incident my Department issued a circular at the end of May, 2008 reminding all local authorities that extensive, untargeted spraying of road verges with herbicide is, prima facie, an offence under Section 40 of the Wildlife Acts, and it is my policy to prosecute in such cases.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

213 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45851/08]

The information requested in the question is set out in the following table.

Name of Consultant

Title of report

Cost (Including VAT)

Year

Indecon

Independent Assessment of Proposed Acquisition by the Irish Heritage Trust Limited of Fota House and Gardens, Co Cork

14,520.00

2007

UCD ERG

Energy Efficiency Regulations for New Dwellings & Options for Improvement

108,779

2007

NSAI

Eurocode 2 Study — Concrete Study (on going)

81,675 (total contract price)

2007

NSAI

Eurocode 6 Study — Masonry Study(on going)

65,004 (total contract price)

2007

Fitzpatrick Associates

Review of the operation of Local Authority Capital Expenditure

29,251.75 (06) 29251.25 (07)

2007

Mazars

Financial Review of the Trustees of Muckross House (Killarney), Ltd.

28,647

2007

ESRI

Quarterly survey of Repair and maintenance

24,200

2007

DKM

Construction Industry Reports

117,954

2007

O’Mahony Pike Planning Consultants

Urban Design Guide

240,000

2007

National Institute for Regional & Spatial Analysis

Evaluation of European Spatial Network Research to Ireland

48,376

2007

Tobin Consulting Engineers

National Litter Pollution Monitoring System Report

104,398

2007

AEA Consultancy

Analysis of national emissions of pollutants from Powergen sector

29,950

2007

Dr. Liam Downey & Dr. Dermot Harrington

Monitoring of Archaeological Monuments Programme

94,985

2007

DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald

Storage of Electronic Voting Equipment — Conclusion of Local Lease Arrangements

35,090

2007

NSAI

Code of Practice on Timber Frame Houses

33,882.50

2007

John Fitzgerald

Limerick Regeneration Programme

21,764

2007

RITS

Report on the security of meteorological self-briefing systems for aviation

8,500

2007

Mary Higgins

Examination, assessment and modification of a draft version of revised homeless strategy (final version entitled: “The Way Home: A strategy to address adult homelessness 2008-2013”)

4,114

2007

Gus Cummins

Process Auditor on Mullingar DBO Sewerage Scheme

5,261

2007

OCTO Consultants

INEX 3 Exercise Report Ireland

43,449.30

2007

Owen Boyle

Process Auditor on Grouped DBO Sewerage Scheme Waterford

19,068

9,443 (2007) 9,624 (2008)

John Murphy

Final Accounts Examination on water services schemes

21,570

16,425 (2007) 5,145 (2008)

Name of Consultant

Title of report

Cost (Including VAT)

Year

Indecon

Independent Assessment of Proposed Acquisition by the Irish Heritage Trust Limited of Annes Grove House, Garden and Home Farm, Castletownroche, Mallow, Co Cork.

14,520.00

2008

OCTO Consultants

INEX 3 Exercise Report Ireland

4,827.70

2008

Nathan O’Connor

Preparatory work in relation to ‘Service Indicators in Local Authorities 2007’

9,000

2008

Indecon International Economic Consultants

Indecon Review of County/City Development Board Strategic Reviews and Proposals for Strengthening and Developing the Boards

93,170

2008

McHugh O Cofaigh

Limiting Thermal Bridging & Air Infiltration Acceptable Construction Details

18,368.27

2008

Murrays Consultants

Communications Strategy for ENFO

32,812

2008

Brid McGrath

Development of A Library Plan for ENFO

13,500

2008

Prof. Jukka Jokilehto

World Heritage Tentative List for Ireland Review (Part 1)

5071.00

2008

Prof. Jukka Jokilehto

World Heritage Tentative List for Ireland Review (Part 2)

3872.65

2008

White Young Green

Former Irish Steel Plant Environmental Report (2008)

355,856.87

2008

Sirius

Peer review of WYG Environmental Report 2008

22,958.26

2008

Eunomia Research and Consulting

International Review of Waste Management Policy

Work now underway but no payments made to date

2008

ESRI

Quarterly survey of Repair and maintenance

26,620

2008

DKM

Construction Industry Reports

117,954

2008

AP Env Econ Ltd

Regulatory Impact Assessment Report (Waste Facilities & Plastic Bags)

67,894

2008

Goodbody Economic Consultants

Gateway Innovation Fund Proposal Evaluation

73,689

2008

Tobin Consulting Engineers

National Litter Pollution Monitoring System Report

101,203

2008

Goodbody Economic Consultants

Assessment of Need for “Living over the Shop” Tax Incentives to Support Urban Regeneration in NSS Gateways

32,186

2008

Enviros Consulting

Study on Meeting the Requirements of the European Regulation 842 on Certain Fluorinated Greenhouses (F-Gases)

84,657.60

2008

Aegis Archaeology Ltd.

Knocknarea, Carrowmore and Carns Hill Conservation Study

71,148

2008

Headland Archaeology Ltd.

Irish Battlefields Project

290,542

2008

Margaret Gowen & Co. Ltd.

Monasterboice Conservation Study

39,160.44

2008

Name of Consultant

Title of report

Cost (Including VAT)

Year

Golder Associates

Geotechnical Consultancy — Rath Lugh

3,257.34

2008

University College Dublin

Preliminary Study on the Establishment of an Electoral Commission in Ireland

8,400

2008

NSAI

Code of Practice on Timber Frame Houses

13,553

2008

NCCRI

Building Integrated Neighbourhoods

10,000

2008

Combat Poverty Agency

Fuel Poverty Study

15,000

2008

Grant Thornton

Strategic Review of the Capital Funding Scheme for Voluntary & Cooperative Housing

80,000

2008

Olive Safety Services

Draft of Safety Statement

1,089

2008

Mary Higgins

Advice and input in relation to implementation plan of homeless strategy

4,981

2008

Brendan Fehily

Review and Report on Certain Matters Relating to Dublin City Council’s Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant at Ringsend

34,345

2008

Maurice O’Connell

Final Accounts Examination on water services schemes

9,915

2008

Community Consultants

Waterford Youth Service — Research Project

15,000

Report to be completed by early 2009

Recycling Policy.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

214 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position regarding the proposal to fund the implementation of recommendations set out in the market development programme for waste resources in 2007 with €13 million; the individual projects on which the €13 million will be spent; the time period involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45915/08]

The work programme for the Market Development Programme is outlined in the Market Development Programme for Waste Resources 2007 — 2011 which is available on my Department's website. The programme will run for a period of 5 years and commenced on 1 October 2008. As I have previously indicated, in light of recent developments in the market for recyclates, I have asked that the work programme be reviewed with a view to prioritising elements which can help address these developments. Following this review, a work plan for 2009 will be published in January.

Private Rented Accommodation.

Richard Bruton

Question:

215 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of rented properties which have been registered with the Private Residential Tenancies Board in Dublin City. [45920/08]

My Department has no function in the operational matters of the Private Residential Tenancies Board (PRTB), which is an independent statutory body established under the terms of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004. The PRTB may be contacted at their offices at O'Connell Bridge House, Dublin 2 or by telephone or email. Contact details and details of tenancy registrations are available on the Board's website at www.prtb.ie

Special Protection Areas.

Richard Bruton

Question:

216 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the objections which have been lodged to his proposed special protection order for Dublin Bay; if the advisory body has assessed these objections; if he has set a date by which the advice must be furnished to him; and when he plans to make a decision. [45921/08]

In May of 2008, I proposed that three areas in Dublin Bay be designated as Special Protection Areas for birds and invited submissions on the proposals. Of the submissions received within the three month time-frame, only three included requests for areas within the proposed sites to be excluded from the designation. All three related to the proposed South Dublin Bay and River Tolka Estuary Special Protection Area (site number 004024). Two of the submissions were from local authorities and one was from a semi state body. These submissions are being examined in my Department and will be discussed with the bodies concerned. I will make a decision in each instance once this process of dialogue has concluded and in the light of the appropriate advice to me. I hope to be in a position to make these decisions early in the New Year.

The Designated Areas Appeals Advisory Board will not be involved in this case. This body is used primarily to advise me in regard to objections from private individual land owners and users.

Dublin Bay Task Force.

Richard Bruton

Question:

217 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the way he will ensure that the master plan being developed for Dublin Bay by Dublin City Council and by the task force which he has appointed are ultimately given legal effect. [45922/08]

The Dublin Bay Task Force was established at my request by the Dublin Regional Authority, to prepare a draft Master Plan for Dublin Bay and make recommendations in relation to institutional arrangements for coastal zone management in the Bay. As outlined in the Programme for Government, I will consider legislation, if necessary, to implement the recommendations of the Task Force.

Dublin City Council, which is represented on the Dublin Bay Task Force, has prepared a report on its analysis of the future of the central Bay area, from Sutton to Booterstown entitled A Vision for Dublin Bay. The report, and the studies underpinning it, is being considered by the Task Force in the context of its own work on the future of the Bay.

Departmental Bodies.

Martin Ferris

Question:

218 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the amount of travel and subsistence paid to each chief executive officer of the seven Regional Fisheries Boards, during the year ending 31 December 2007. [45672/08]

The payment of expenses is a day-to-day operational matter for each of the regional fisheries boards and I have no function in the matter.

Telecommunications Services.

Joe McHugh

Question:

219 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the reason the local exchange upgrade for broadband is not servicing the house of a person (details supplied) in County Donegal that is located 3 km from the local exchange upgrade; if he will address this problem; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45687/08]

I have no function in the matter of the enabling for broadband purposes of exchanges owned by private companies or the quality of lines for provision of broadband services.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

220 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45695/08]

My Department is fully engaged in the Better Regulation agenda to contribute to the initiative of making it easier to do business in the State and with the State.

The Better Regulation agenda, including regulatory impact analysis and administrative burden reduction practices, is part of the everyday normal work of staff in all Divisions of the Department.

Staff resources are not exclusively deployed to deal with this issue due to the fact that it is part of their ongoing workload. It is not possible, therefore, to separate out the costs of servicing the needs of Better Regulation from overall administration costs.

Telecommunications Services.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

221 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if his attention has been drawn to the problem with the ducting for the provision of broadband in Tuam, County Galway whereby it is proposed to install a new water and drainage scheme but without putting in the proper ducting for broadband which would appear to be the most efficient way of doing the job without having to dig up the streets again; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45710/08]

I presume the Deputy is referring to the possible construction of a Metropolitan Network (MAN) in Tuam should a future phase of MANs be approved. Any future investment decisions, including investment in further phases of the MANs Programme, will be guided by (i) a policy paper on Next Generation Broadband, which is being finalised at present, (ii) a Value for Money and Policy Review undertaken on Phase I of the MANs Programme (iii) any other analysis as appropriate and (iv) the availability of resources.

Should Tuam be selected for investment under a new phase of the MANs Programme then any MANs duct laid as part of the water and drainage scheme could be funded as advance works for the MANs project. It is a matter for the relevant local authority to decide whether or not to include and fund appropriate ducting at this stage.

Grant Payments.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

222 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if he will forward the details of the new insulation grant to a person (details supplied) in County Galway. [45713/08]

I will arrange for Sustainable Energy Ireland to forward details of the Home Energy Saving Scheme to the individual, as soon as they become available.

Broadcasting Services.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

223 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources when the compulsory switch to digital television is scheduled for north Dublin city; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45838/08]

The Broadcasting (Amendment) Act, 2007 puts in place a flexible framework for the licensing of Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) into the future. The Act provides for the development of DTT by both public service and commercial broadcasters. The DTT service is being used to upgrade and eventually replace the national analogue free to air television services provided by RTÉ, TG4 and TV3 and received using an aerial.

In order for Ireland to benefit fully from the switch to DTT, a switch-off of analogue terrestrial television services is necessary. Ireland has indicated that analogue switch over will take place by 2012, in line with other European countries. Section 11 of the Broadcasting (Amendment) Act, 2007, provides a mechanism for setting a date(s) for analogue switch over. In providing such a date(s), the Minister must take account of, inter alia, the extent of rollout and take up of digital television services.

Information in relation to the notice and timing of analogue switch off will be made available to viewers at an appropriate future date.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

224 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45846/08]

In the following table are details of consultancies for 2007 and to date in 2008. The table contains data on Marine consultancies that were undertaken prior to the transfer of functions to the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food during 2007. The data covers both consultancies incurred under subhead A7 of my Department's Vote as well as consultancies associated with Programme spend. Expenditure on consultancies in 2009 will be significantly reduced in line with Government policy.

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

DCENR Audit Committee

Chair & Board of Audit Committee

5,000

5,000

Temporary Head of Internal Audit Unit

Helm Corporation Ltd

27,091

56,218

Provision of Mediation Services

Mason Hayes + Curran

11,494

11,776

Provision of Mediation Services

John O’Dowd

5,445

Provision of Mediation Services

McGuinness Killen Partnership Ltd

1,634

Preparation of five FHCF Accounts for 2005

O’Malley & Company

1,162

Financial Advisor to DCMNR

ESB Independent Generation

93,170

16,940

Spot Checks on Capital Investment 2006

DK Crowley

10,748

2005-2006 EAGGF Audit

Deloitte & Touche

2,213

Financial Advisor to the Department

Stephen O’Connor

114,092

193,056

Expert Advice on Health and Safety Audits

Employment and Safety Associates

14,470

Healthy Eating Initiative

Miss Marguerite Brennan — Murphy

4,550

TechReview of the emergency call answering service (ECAS)

Norcontel (Ireland) Ltd

171,858

129,319

Legal Advice on procurement of an ECAS Provider

Matheson Ormsby Prentice

91,143

24,543

Non-Ionizing Radiation (NIR)

Eric van Rongen

15,826

Non-Ionizing Radiation (NIR)

Dr. Michael Repacholi

7,190

Drafting of Broadcasting (Amendment) Act 2007

Marie McGonagle

7,500

Drafting of Broadcasting (Amendment) Act 2007

Margaret O’Driscoll

28,435

7,865

RTÉ Licence Fee Review

INDECON

171,699

Legal advice against threatened legal actions

Mason Hayes + Curran

38,480

Media Literacy

Media Literacy Education

9,000

Re-Engineering of annual RTÉ Review Process

PriceWaterhouseCoopers

102,197

Legal advice on DTT

Mason Hayes + Curran

30,825

Technical Advice on DTT

Gary Tonge

5,446

Review of public sector benefit of postcodes

PA Consulting

54,450

Assistance on draft policy paper on Next Generation Networks

Analysys Mason Limited

23,506

30,849

Legal Advice for BnM — ESOP documentation

A & L Goodbody Solicitors

11,108

26,018

Legal Advice for BGÉ — ESOP

Beauchamp Solicitors

62,267

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

Legal Advice re post sale of INPC/Whitegate Refinery

Matheson Ormsby Prentice

97,068

8,492

Review of Ireland’s access to commercial Oil Supplies

Purvin & Gertz Inc

271,766

Study on transmission line infrastructure

ECOFYS GMBH

145,052

Study on transmission line infrastructure

Brindley Advertising

22,100

Study on transmission line infrastructure

Golder Associates Ire

3,388

Review of proposed BGÉ investments

KPMG

181,500

Review of proposed BGÉ investments

Mason Hayes + Curran

22,578

Legal Advice on Biofuels Mineral Oil Tax Relief

Arthur Cox Solicitor

1,431

Drafting of PSO under Section 39 of Electricity Reg Act 1999

Noel J Travers

9,075

Gas to the Northwest Study

Fingleton White & Co Ltd

141,699

Legal Advice to EU infringement proceedings

Mason Hayes + Curran

68,964

All Island LNG & Gas Storage Study

CSA Group

213,738

DETINI — Review of North South Pipeline

Dept Enterprise Trade & Investment NI

16,195

Single Electricity Market

CAP ITA Resourcing Ltd

35,091

All Island Grid Study

Dept Enterprise Trade & Investment NI

218,608

Legal Advice for ESB — ESOP

Beauchamp Solicitors

18,265

Corporate branding and website design

Dara Design & Print Ltd

6,697

UCD Portal Study

Kepler Consulting Ltd

6,970

Provision of international seabed mapping services

Marine Institute

4,600

Advice on GSI library acquisitions & management 07

Dr. Ralph Horne

5,250

5,670

Advice GSI to link data/outputs to LC Syllabus 07

AG Education Services Ltd

18,150

Archivist Services for Archived Files

Petra Coffey

15,000

17,500

Archivist Services for Archived Files

Eneclann

2,856

EPA Mine Wastes

CDM (Camp Dresser & Mc Kee Irl Ltd)

40,000

Groundwater Protection

Tobin Consulting Engineers

81,675

Aggregate Resource Mapping

Mr Michael Philcox

16,093

Geoenvironmental Surveys (Airborne Data Interpreta

Reid Geophysics

2,551

Geoenvironmental Surveys (Airborne Data Interpreta

PetRos Eikom Ltd

4,060

Geoenvironmental Surveys (Airborne Data Interpreta

Natural Environ Research Council

15,058

GeoUrban (Dublin Pilot Project)

Aurum Exploration Ltd

19,152

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

GeoUrban (Dublin Pilot Project)

Glenbeigh Records Management

2,142

Geoheritage (Geoparks)

DR ROBBIE MEEHAN

20,570

Comparative Study GSI / GSINI

CSA Group

14,338

Corrib Verification Process

KEANE OFFSHORE INTEGRITY LTD

90,077

116,963

Environmental Monitoring Group

Members of EMG

4,981

5,171

Review of Licensing Terms

INDECON

30,710

Strategic Environmental Assessment — Porcupine

ERT (Scotland) Ltd

119,325

Strategic Environmental Assessment — Porcupine

Louise Johnson

1,324

Oil and Gas Industry Support Service

CSA Group

78,652

10,249

Petroleum Engineering Support

David Fox

170,538

Legal Advice on Corrib Pipeline

Arthur Cox Solicitor

42,946

Review of Corrib EIS

AEA Technology

47,204

Geophysical Support

Clare Morgan

56,114

OIC 2007 Action

Cefas — Lowestoft Laboratory

3,527

TAG on Corrib

Advantia

22,870

INFOMAR

Grainne O’Shea

2,458

IT Consultancy (Landmark Software)

DMAP Ltd

1,178

IT Consultancy

CPL Solutions

9,051

Provision of technology briefings and advise on ICT trends and implementation strategies

Gartner Ireland Ltd

38,745

IT Infrastructure

Nexitroane

3,963

ICT Strategy

Astron / Sonas / RITS

70,422

Expenditure Reviews of MANS and GBS

Petrus Consulting Ltd

3,388

Expenditure Review of EU & Exchequer Support of the Aquaculture Sector

Epsilon Consulting

5,808

ICT Project Consultancy

NBI Consulting

854

ICT Project Consultancy

Richard Black Solicitors

32,973

ICT Project Consultancy

Magnum Opus Ltd

1,671,495

1,158,166

ICT Project Consultancy

Norcontel (ire) Ltd

22,267

15,282

ICT Project Consultancy

Arthur Cox Solicitor

114,406

569,580

ICT Project Consultancy

Quantum Equity

12,584

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

ICT Project Consultancy

KPMG

18,150

ICT Project Consultancy

Eamonn O’hEachach

32,348

Legal Advice — Schools Broadband

Mason Hayes & Curran

9,273

Group Broadband Scheme

Mazars

48,666

NBS Consultancy

Aneta Scieplek

28,942

60,334

NBS Consultancy

Commission for Communications Regulation

157,397

67,517

NBS Consultancy

ESRI Ireland

28,433

39,441

NBS Consultancy

McCann Fitzgerald

572,229

NBS Consultancy

Analysys Mason Ltd

32,670

NBS Consultancy

Eoin McCullough

6,050

Next Genaration Networks

Alexandra Dunlop

29,928

Make IT Secure

Ireach

20,000

Review of National Digital Research Centre

Various

6,393

ICT Project Consultancy

Richard Black Solicitors

1,331

Digital Terrestrial Television

John F O’Connor

6,150

Digital Terrestrial Television

Maxtel Communications

14,429

Digital Terrestrial Television

BT Ireland

7,986

Digital Terrestrial Television

Gary Tonge

3,519

Gas Technical Standards Committee

National Standards Authority of Ireland

41,399

36,000

Energy Research Strategy

Network Resources Ltd

65,050

National Energy Efficiency Campaign

Network Resources Ltd (Dr heather Greer)

3,969

1,703,584

National Energy Efficiency Campaign

Cawley Nea Ltd

4,953,031

Review of Fisheries Act 1959 — 2006

Alan McGurdy

4,966

INFOMAR

Sea & Shore Safety Services Ltd

965

INFOMAR

Grainne O’Shea

57,007

46,813

INFOMAR

Ronan O’Toole

13,777

27,875

INFOMAR

Fugro Survey Ltd

1,211

INFOMAR

Woods Hole Oceanic Institute

1,194

INFOMAR

John Deasy

5,400

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

INFOMAR

PWC Belfast

66,086

Petroleum Engineering Support (sept 07 — aug 08)

David Fox Associates

41,288

17,940

Petroleum Engineering Support (May 06 — June 07)

David Fox Associates

175,879

IT Consultancy (Landmark Software)

DMAP Ltd

1,674

Corporate branding and website design

Dara Design & Print Ltd

19,940

Advisory Services to CSSO re legal case Minister vs Mogul of Ireland Ltd

BDO Simpson Xavier

4,840

Corporate Recovery Services

BDO Simpson Xavier

3,630

Advice on closure / restoration scheme for new Dolomite Quarry, Co Tipperary

John Barnett & Associates

5,324

Rehabilitation of Clashduff Mine

Hayes Higgins Partnership

1,215

Interpretation of Airborne Geophysical Data

PGW Europe Ltd

4,840

Avoca Remedial Study

Camp, Dresser & McKee Irl Ltd

567,874

122,612

Airborne Geophysical Data Release Programme

Scantech Geosceince Ltd

11,519

Examination of planning application for K2 extension to Galmoy Mine

Cantab Consulting Ltd

12,122

Geological Advice

Ben Dhonau

18,093

IGH County Sites Audit

Aaron Sheehan Clarke

16,000

Provision of Interviews for site suitability Assessment Training Programme

Cormac O’Suilleabhain

1,452

1,125

Griffith Geoscience Research Awards

Dr David A Falvey

5,455

Galway Groundwater Vulnerability Maps

Dr David Drew

1,400

EPA Mine Waste

Dr JA Martin

1,736

Galway Groundwater Vulnerability Maps

Dr Robbie Meehan

41,019

Galway Groundwater Vulnerability Maps

Tobin Consulting Engineers

77,686

Gwater Source Prot (Off/Ros/CK)

Dr Robbie Meehan

650

1,815

Wastewater Septic tank Course

Dr Robbie Meehan

1,089

2,068

Wastewater Septic tank Course

Dr Pamela Bartley

4,503

Wastewater Septic tank Course

ESRI Ireland

3,176

EPA Mine Waste

Dr Vincent Gallagher

54,450

67,936

EU Water Framework Directive

ESRI Ireland

70,852

Historic Mines Project

Fionnuala Ni Mairtin

14,450

55,951

Consultancy

Consultant

2007

2008

EPA Mine Waste

GWP Consultants

10,536

EPA Mine Waste

AGB

85

Wastewater Septic tank Course

Laurence Gill

726

Wastewater Septic tank Course

Gerard Murphy

1,091

IGH County Sites Audit

Mr Aaron Clarke

24,000

Irelithos

Mr Jason Bolton

47,094

EPA Mine Waste

Mr Pheilim Lally

45,375

259

Griffith Geoscience Research Awards

Natural Environ Research Council

1,105

Gwater Source Prot (Off/Ros/CK)

Paul Johnston

1,089

Irelithos

Claudia Loesch

9,081

Griffith Geoscience Research Awards

Prof CJ Hawkesworth

3,280

Geourban project — data manipulation

Aurum Exploration

26,813

Aggregate Potential Mapping

Mr Pheilim Lally

12,705

77,510

GIS Technician Services — GeoUrban Dublin pilot project

Edel O’Regan

14,888

33,499

National Mapping Programme -

Tobin Consulting Engineers

29,040

247,407

National Aquaifer Report

Geoff Wright

14,625

Landslides Susceptibility Mapping

M/S Mouchel Ireland

89,811

PRISM Models Maintenance

National University Galway

24,000

Coast Protection Strategy Study

National University Galway

30,000

Coast Protection Strategy Study

RPS Consulting Engineers

91,264

Coast Protection Strategy Study

Compass Informatics Ltd

13,256

Coastal Surveys

Blom Aerofilms Ltd

16,220

Coastal Surveys

Simmons Aerofilms

6,738

Coastal Surveys

Ormston Technology Ltd

2,034

Independent Review of Fisheries Control Regime

Martec NI Ltd

202,217

Drafting of SIs in relation to Sales Notes

Una Mary Tighe

11,193

Tarbet

IGLS Ltd

2,752

Departmental Schemes.

Finian McGrath

Question:

225 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if an evaluation of the effectiveness of the food dudes pilot scheme in primary schools has been carried out; and if he will make a statement on the implementation of the scheme to date. [45803/08]

Evaluations of the Food Dude Programme were undertaken by UCD in 2006 and 2007, which indicated that children who participated in the programme were now consuming more fruit and vegetables both at school and at home. The success of the pilot programme was recognised when it was awarded the International Best Practice Award from the World Health Organisation in 2006. An evaluation of the earlier Bord Glas pilot scheme which was published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition earlier this year concluded that the Food Dude intervention was effective in changing parental provision and children's consumption of lunchbox fruit and vegetables in Ireland.

A further evaluation was undertaken in 2008, which found that the programme was very well received by over 90% of participating children, parents and teachers.

Farm Waste Management.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

226 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the statistics on a county basis of the number of applications approved for participation in the farm waste management scheme; the level of funding dispersed to date under this scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45678/08]

42,970 approvals to commence work have issued, to date, to farmers under the revised Farm Waste Management Scheme introduced by my Department in March 2006. A county-by-county breakdown of these approvals is not available at present.

To date in 2008, €346.56 million has been paid out to farmers under the Scheme. This compares to €113.88 million in 2007 and €21.32 million in 2006.

Live Exports.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

227 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the live export trade during the course of 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45679/08]

Live exports are an important component of Ireland's livestock industry providing an essential alternative to competition with the beef trade.

Live cattle exports from Ireland in 2007 amounted to 207,000 animals, worth an estimated €110 million. To date this year, 141,347 live cattle and calves have been exported from Ireland (up to week ending 22nd November). This number is some 30% below the level for the corresponding period in 2007.

Bord Bia is working intensely to give support to the export of Irish livestock through a number of targeted activities. This includes providing up-to-date market information to live exporters, weekly livestock reports and bi-monthly market-updates from Spain, Italy and the Netherlands, along with regular communication with market offices.

Each year, Bord Bia also organises livestock open days in Spain and Italy, in conjunction with individual exporters. This involves displaying Irish cattle in a continental feedlot, illustrating their advantages in health, performance and carcass quality to potential customers and agri-media. Other services provided by market offices include contact with buyers, arranging itineraries / inward buyer visits, language interpretation, attendance at trade fairs and market research.

Bord Bia Marketing Strategies.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

228 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the success achieved during 2008 by An Bord Bia in securing new markets and increased market share for Irish beef and lamb; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45680/08]

The Bord Bia marketing strategy for Irish beef for 2008 to 2013 is being implemented since the beginning of this year. The main emphasis of the strategy is on the high value European market. While the retail penetration of Irish beef in Europe is already very high and there is little room for significant conversion of new business there have been considerable gains in terms of volume of higher value business going to standard retail outlets and the introduction of 24 premium offerings in foodservice and retail outlets in Italy, Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Scandinavia, Germany & Eastern Europe.

The Bord Bia lamb strategy for 2008 is based on a number of objectives. These include maximising returns on the home market by means of promotional programmes during the year which have targeted younger consumers by highlighting the convenience and versatility of lamb. Consumer penetration at retail level has grown from 70% to 73%, and lamb's market share within the meat category has remained stable.

Bord Bia also assist exporters to diversify into new markets through a number of branding and packaging initiatives to add value to export volumes on non-traditional markets. These include two new retail listings on the British market and a direct retail supply contract with a Scandinavian retailer.

Bord Bia is also collaborating in the Generic Lamb/‘Agneau Presto' Campaign in France. The goal of the campaign is to attract new consumers into the lamb category by developing a more convenient, portion driven offer that appeals to younger consumers. The campaign launched in February 2008, has received significant media coverage and retail presence.

To support this Bord Bia launched an in-store merchandising campaign with five major retail groups which ran from August to October 2008. The campaign which represented a total investment of €3.9million will run over a three year period to 2010. Coupled with the Premium Lamb promotion, the Agneau Presto ensured that Irish lamb was sold in over 1,000 retail outlets across the Belgian and French market.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

229 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45693/08]

An officer in the Legal Services Division of my Department is a member of the RIA Network and is also the liaison officer within the Department for RIA. The Better Regulation Agenda is a portion of this officer's work. In addition 8 officers attended the RIA training course at the Civil Service Training and Development Centre this year. It has not been necessary for my Department to allocate resources to Better Regulation other than the staff outlined above.

Grant Payments.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

230 Deputy Paul Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason a person (details supplied) in County Galway has not received their payment under the cow suckler welfare scheme in respect of the 25 animals for which they applied; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45709/08]

Payment of €1,360 in respect of seventeen animals was issued on 14 November 2008. Five calves will not qualify for payment as they were registered outside the statutory requirement of 27 days from the date of birth. One calf will not qualify because its dam calved down under 22 months of age. The remaining two animals are showing errors on the animal event dates. Staff from the Suckler Herds Section of my Department in Portlaoise will be in contact with the herdowner shortly to seek to resolve the remaining errors.

Farm Inspections.

Martin Ferris

Question:

231 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the source from which his Department receives the satellite photographs used in departmental inspections of farms. [45717/08]

Martin Ferris

Question:

246 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the legislation, domestic or EU, under which the use of satellite photographs as evidence in farm inspections is based. [45841/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 231 and 246 together.

The EU Commission provides the satellite imagery used for eligibility inspections by way of Remote Sensing. Satellite inspections are carried out for the control of eligibility of the area-based schemes in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 796/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Single Payment Scheme and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1973/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of further support schemes, including the Energy Crops Scheme and the Protein Crop Premium. The inspections are carried out in accordance with Common Technical Specifications for the application of satellite inspections specified by the EU Commission each Scheme year.

Rural Environment Protection Scheme.

Pádraic McCormack

Question:

232 Deputy Pádraic McCormack asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason REP scheme payments are not being made to a person (details supplied) in County Galway who joined the REP scheme in January 2005 and has not been paid for 2007 and 2008; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45740/08]

The person named commenced participation in REPS with effect from 1 May 2005. She received payments for the first two years. However she was then selected for inspection and land included in the application was found to be ineligible. She appealed this decision locally and then to the Agriculture Appeals Office. The Appeals Office upheld the Department's decision and the person named was notified of this by letter dated 28th November 2008.

Farm Retirement Scheme.

Michael Creed

Question:

233 Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when a decision will be made on an application by a person (details supplied) in County Cork in respect of their application for early retirement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45750/08]

The application in question is being examined with a view to being finalised shortly. The person named will be informed of the outcome once this examination is complete.

Michael Creed

Question:

234 Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will reverse his decision to disallow an application for early retirement by a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45752/08]

An application under the Early Retirement (ERS3) Scheme for the person named was received in my Department on 16 October 2008. It could not be accepted for processing as the Scheme was suspended for new applications with effect from 15 October 2008.

I have no plans, at present, to reopen the Early Retirement Scheme to new applications, but the limiting of the suspension of the Scheme will be considered at the earliest opportunity having regard to the general budgetary situation.

Rural Environment Protection Scheme.

Michael Creed

Question:

235 Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he proposes to restrict access for farmers to the REP scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45754/08]

The Programme for Government sets a target of 70,000 farmers in REPS. At present there are some 61,000 farmers involved,including 12,700 applicants for REPS 4. Notwithstanding the current budgetary difficulties, I have allocated an increased provision for REPS in 2009 of €355 million and I believe this demonstrates my commitment to the long-term future of REPS as a measure that has brought great benefits not only to farmers and the environment but also to the community as a whole. The 2009 allocation seeks to protect REPS, including the 17% increase in rates, and to ensure that it can continue to accommodate farmers wishing to join in 2009.

Departmental Surveys.

Michael Ring

Question:

236 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when a ground visit will be arranged in order that a matter in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will be finalised. [45761/08]

The ground survey has taken place recently and a map will be drawn up as soon as possible.

Grant Payments.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

237 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will put in place an arrangement in which a farmer can claim their grant in advance of paying bills associated with the investment in view of the fact that a number of farmers are encountering problems obtaining finance to meet all bills in relation to the farm waste management scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45763/08]

The provisions of the Farm Waste Management Scheme require farmers to lodge a fully documented payment claim with my Department by 31 December 2008. I do not propose to alter this procedure.

Farm Inspections.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

238 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if, in view of the pressures on public expenditure, he will address the issue in which a number of State agencies are inspecting farms on the same issue, for example, his Department and local authorities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45764/08]

The position is that the Local Authorities are the designated control authorities under the Nitrates Regulations (SI no. 378 of 2006) which are the responsibility of the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in the first instance. As such they have legislative obligations in terms of monitoring and controls. My Department has responsibility for nitrates inspections in the context of the cross-compliance arrangements associated with Direct Payment Schemes to farmers. The Nitrates Directive is one of the 18 Statutory Management Requirements under cross-compliance.

Dairy Sector.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

239 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the price supports he is seeking from the EU Commission, in view of the difficult position in dairy markets at present and the bleak outlook for 2009, in order to stabilise markets at a reasonable price level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45765/08]

In view of the temporary volatility in dairy markets and uncertainty in the short-term outlook, I contacted EU Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel in early November to activate market measures in support of the sector. I was pleased that the Commission acted decisively and brought forward the scheme of private storage aid for butter. This will now take effect from 1st January, two months earlier than usual and will assist in stabilising the market. At the Agriculture Council on 28th November the Commissioner agreed to keep the market situation under review and to come forward with additional measures in the New Year should the situation warrant it.

Once the effect of the early introduction of APS is evident, we can then assess the need to activate other mechanisms to assist dairy exporters who are facing difficulties exporting product from the EU onto world markets. I will continue to monitor developments in the dairy markets and will intervene again with the Commissioner as the market situation evolves.

EU market supports are extremely important particularly in times of market volatility. In the recent Health Check negotiations, the maintenance of key market supports was one of my main objectives. Securing the retention of intervention for butter and SMP, without losing the compulsory purchase at the intervention price of the first 30,000 tonnes and 109,000 tonnes respectively was a major achievement. This was true also in respect of the retention of private storage aid for butter. This was crucial given our need to even out the production cycle and allow product to be kept in the control of processors for subsequent release into commercial markets. As a result of the Health Check negotiations, I have secured the preservation of all the important market instruments that Ireland uses without any change whatever. These will now be activated, first with APS in January and later, in March, when intervention will be open where warranted by market conditions.

Milk Quota.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

240 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food his views on the fact that less than 10% of dairy farmers purchased milk quota in the last quota exchange; the measures he will take to restore confidence in the dairy sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45766/08]

Decisions by dairy farmers in regard to the purchase of milk quota in the Milk Quota Trading Scheme are based on individual circumstances, an assessment of the value and need for milk quota in particular farm enterprises and the prevailing market conditions for milk and milk products. On this occasion, 13 per cent of all dairy farmers decided to apply for quota and I am very pleased that 75 per cent of those who did apply were successful. In fact, nearly 90 per cent of all milk quota offered for sale was taken up.

On the broader question of restoring confidence, I have stated repeatedly that, while the current environment is a volatile one, policy needs to be driven by a consideration of the long-term outlook rather than short-term volatility. Longer-term prospects are generally very positive, with a sustained increase in global demand for dairy products anticipated over the next decade and beyond. Ireland needs to position itself to take advantage of the opportunities presented by such developments.

The Government's strategy has been a three-pronged one. The first element has been the implementation of the €100 million Dairy Investment Fund aimed at stimulating the necessary investment at processing level to ensure the long-term competitiveness of the industry. The second has been the introduction of the Milk Quota Trading Scheme, which has brought a more open market approach to the transfer of milk quota and has ensured that larger volumes of quota than ever before are now getting into the hands of active, committed milk producers. The final element was delivered recently when I successfully concluded negotiations on the Health Check of the 2003 CAP reform. These delivered an outstanding outcome for the dairy sector in the form of substantial milk quota increases and the retention of the market management measures of key importance to Ireland. Most significantly, the outcome has provided a greater degree of policy certainty for the industry going forward.

Farm Inspections.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

241 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason more than 10% of cross compliance inspections are taking place in December; the progress he has made to reduce the level of inspection from 5% to 1%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45767/08]

Under the Regulations governing cross-compliance, Member States must ensure that on the spot controls for all requirements and standards relevant to cross-compliance are carried out throughout the year.

To-date, for the year 2008, over 96% of farmers selected for control under the cross-compliance requirements, including animal identification and registration requirements, have been inspected.

The rate of on-farm inspection required for cross-compliance is 1% of those farmers to whom the Statutory Management Requirements or GAEC apply. However at least 5% of producers must be inspected annually under the Bovine Animal Identification and Registration requirements as this level is prescribed under the relevant Regulations. In the sheep sector 3% of producers must be inspected annually involving 5% of animals.

Departmental Staff.

Sean Sherlock

Question:

242 Deputy Seán Sherlock asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the annual budget of the special investigations unit; the number of staff who work in the unit; the number of prosecutions made in 2007; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45768/08]

While the Special Investigation Unit (SIU) was established in the late 1980s to deal with serious problems relating to use of illegal substances (hormones, angel dust etc.) in animal production, its remit was expanded in the intervening years to include assistance in the implementation of various schemes and, in particular, to investigate breaches of legislation governing animal disease control, animal identification and smuggling, etc. Apart from investigative duties, the Unit also has an important role in providing advice and training to other staff in the Department.

The investigations of the Unit in the animal remedies area resulted in the successful prosecution of 252 people/companies since 1996 for offences under the animal remedies legislation (72 people received custodial sentences and fines in excess of €0.95m were imposed). In the wider veterinary area, over the past 8 years, its actions resulted in over 130 successful prosecutions. Fines ranging from €250 up to €24,000 have been imposed and periods of imprisonment were laid down in 13 cases.

There were 3 prosecutions initiated in 2007 and 8 successful prosecutions were obtained in the same year. In addition, the Department decided in 2007, following the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Quinn /Tector case, not to proceed with 25 other cases.

The estimated cost of the Unit including staff costs was circa €1.5m in 2007. The current staffing of the Unit stands at 16.

The effectiveness of the actions taken by the Unit is evidenced by the on-going overall low levels of positive samples in food and the absence of residues of growth promoters in targeted testing in recent years under the National Residue Monitoring Plan. In addition, the significant progress made in reducing the incidence of various diseases (i.e. BSE and Brucellosis) in recent years can be partly attributed to the action taken by the Unit.

Coastal Erosion.

Brian O'Shea

Question:

243 Deputy Brian O’Shea asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the proposals he has to urgently address the erosion problems at the Foyle Tramore, Counsellors Strand, Dunmore East and Woodstown Strand in County Waterford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45784/08]

In line with a recent Government decision, responsibility for Coastal Protection and Coastal Flooding will become the responsibility of the Office of Public Works with effect from 1st January 2009. Arrangements are currently in train to effect the transfer.

The Office of Public Works will therefore be responsible for the allocation of funding for Coast Protection works for 2009 and onwards. Any queries with regard to funding should be directed to that office.

Departmental Schemes.

Michael Ring

Question:

244 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if it is open to a person (details supplied) in County Mayo to apply for the suckler welfare scheme; if an application will be accepted at this late stage; and the reason no reply issued from his Department to this query. [45832/08]

The person named did not apply for the Suckler Welfare Scheme by the closing date of 31 March 2008. It will not be possible to accept an application at this late stage, unless there were exceptional circumstances that prevented him from applying on time. Staff from the Suckler Herds Section of my Department in Portlaoise will be in contact with the person named shortly.

The delay in replying to your email dated 24 November 2008 is regretted. It arose because the Suckler Herds Section has been very busy over the last month dealing with the large number of telephone calls and e-mails arising from the issue of query letters and grant payments under the scheme.

Fisheries Protection.

Martin Ferris

Question:

245 Deputy Martin Ferris asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if satellites are used to monitor fishing off the Irish coast. [45840/08]

Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) are required under EU Regulation to be fitted on all fishing vessels over 15 metres in overall length operating in EU waters and all EU vessels wherever they operate. The collection and use of the information received through the VMS system for all vessels operating in Ireland's Exclusive Fisheries Zone and Irish vessels operating in other waters is a matter for the Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA), an independent authority, which was established under Sea Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Act 2006 on January 1st 2007. The Act clearly provides that the Authority is independent in the exercise of its functions and as such I have no remit as to its work programme or its strategic deployment of resources.

Question No. 246 answered with Question No. 231.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

247 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45844/08]

The information requested by the Deputy in respect of my Department for 2007 and 2008 is set out in the following tables:

2007

Name of Consultant

Nature of Work

Payment

John Malone — Consultant

Sheep Strategy Development Group

13,433.02

P.P. Ryan & Co — Solicitors

Legal advice

2,123.55

Configure Ltd

Preparation of a disability access report for 6 Fishery Harbour Centres and recommendation of the implementation plan

19,965.00

Ray Burke Consulting

Development of a Business Plan for the FHCs

23,602.26

Mazars

Assist & provide IT audit expertise to Internal Audit Unit

58,147.00

Achilles Procurement Services

Advice on procurement

3,245.83

Una Tighe

Providing legal advice in relation to drafting a statutory instrument

11,192.50

Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd

Review of the Fishery Control Regime

76,105.78

Dr. Noel Cawley

Chair the Seafood Strategy Implementation Group established to oversee the report on seafood industry — Steering a New Course

29,289.00

Achilles Procurement Services Ltd

Provision of advice & assistance in the preparation of tenders

5,868.63

Open Interface Ltd

Production of an accessibility report on Department’s web & online services

8,470.00

Achilles Procurement Services

Produced report & provided advice on specialised ICT procurement

2,240.00

Vantage Resources

Business analysis for Forestry Online applications, development strategy & costing estimates

20,421.00

Resources Global Consultancy

Conduct a post implementation review on the IFORIS computer system

11,480.00

RITS

Quarterly IT security review report as required for EU Accreditation purposes

2,916.00

ESPION

Quarterly IT security review report as required for EU Accreditation purposes

19,360.00

Royal Haskoning Consulting Engineers

Engineering Consultancy Services for Greencastle Harbour Development

44,242.63

RPS Consulting Engineers

Engineering Consultancy Services for Killybegs Harbour Development

33,370.72

Ryan Hanley Consulting Engineers

Design & supervision for Rossaveal Store, Co. Galway

10,688.80

Mott MacDonald Pettit Consulting Engineers

Project consultants for Rossaveel Ferry Terminal Pontoon Project

83,363.98

Mott MacDonald Pettit Consulting Engineers

Engineering Services: Design & construction of harbour development works at Castletownbere FHC

173,344.75

JE Jacobs Consulting Engineers

Engineering Services: Provision of resident site supervision for works at Castletownbere FHC

139,045.94

RPS Consulting Engineers

Engineering Services for An Daingean FHC Dredging — Studies

39,070.90

RPS consulting Engineers

Detailed Design for Dunmore East Harbour redevelopment

57,814.10

Philip Lee Solicitors

Procurement advice

6,050.00

Marine Modelling Centre (NUI) Galway

Assessment of surge model

10,500.00

Marine Modelling Centre (NUI) Galway

Coastal surge Forecasting

19,500.00

Marine Modelling Centre (NUI) Galway

Running computer model, PRISM

24,000.00

Marine Modelling Centre (NUI) Galway

Relocation of WAM model

10,100.00

Blom Aerofilms UK

Airborne Laser Coastal Survey Ireland- Phase 1

134,592.84

RPS Consulting Engineers

Airborne Laser Coastal Survey Ireland- Phase 2 Tender Assessment

8,991.51

Reencon Development Services

Coastal Protection Strategy Study- Topographic Survey

12,101.21

RPS Consulting Engineers

Coastal Protection Strategy Study- Phase 2

29,510.70

RPS Consulting Engineers

Coastal Protection Strategy Study- Phase 3

108,571.73

Compass Informatics Dublin

Provision of GIS Services

9,804.02

ERA Maptec Dublin

SE Coast DTM Update

7,411.25

Brendan Riordan

Progress report of “The net Contribution of the Agri-Food Sector to the Inflow of Funds- a New Estimate”

3,000.00

Indecon

Acting as independent expert on the implementation of the €145m scheme of EU restructuring aid for the sugar industry

154,670.00

Deloitte & Touche

Pre Accreditation Review

12,500.00

Deloitte & Touche

2006 EAGGF payment 3

47,157.38

Mazar

Computer Audit & Security Services

16,970.00

Mazar

Computer Audit & Security Services

24,960.00

Deloitte & Touche

2007 EAGF & EAFRD payment 1

158,912.00

Deloitte & Touche

2007 EAGF & EAFRD payment 2

161,159.42

Deloitte & Touche

Pre Accreditation Review

17,890.00

Mazar

Computer Audit & Security Services

6,125.00

Ecosafe/Surepath

Dangerous goods adviser

5,973.00

John McCarthy Consultant

Consultancy in relation to the introduction of Milk Quota trading scheme

1,331.00

IFER Monitoring & Mapping Solutions

National Forestry Inventory

57,213.00

UCD Forestry Department

National Forestry Inventory

3,200.00

Dr. Gerhardt Gallagher

National Forestry Inventory

3,085.50

Bearing point Management Consultants

Work on Human Resource Management System

38,060.55

2008

Name of Consultant

Nature of Work

Payment

Mazars

To assist and provide IT audit expertise to the Internal Audit Unit

67,911.00

Fitzpatrick Associates, Economic Consultants

Independent Ex-Post Evaluation of the Rural Development Plan 2000-2006

74,084.25

John Malone

The preparation of a report “Factors Affecting Afforestation in Ireland in Recent Years” that was published by the Department in March 2008

23,363.83

Deloitte & Touche Certifying Body

2007 EAGF & EAFRD payment 3

83,936.61

Deloitte & Touche Certifying Body

2008 EAGF & EAFRD payment 1

161,595.56

Mazar

Computer Audit and Security Services

18,425.00

Mazar

Computer Audit and Security Services

20,250.00

Mazar

Computer Audit and Security Services

17,450.00

Deloitte & Touche Certifying Body

2008 EAGF & EAFRD payment 2

164,013.02

Deloitte & Touche Certifying Body

2008 EAGF & EAFRD on the Spot Checks Payment 1

19,518.40

Brendan Riordan

Completion of report “The Net Contribution of the Agri-Food Sector to the Inflow of Funds- a New Estimate”

3,000.00

Horizon Consulting

Review of VFM report

1,936.00

Horizon Consulting

Review of VFM report

2,299.00

Raymond Burke Consulting

Review of VFM report

3,267.00

Raymond Burke Consulting

Review of VFM report

2,722.50

Iwrite

Review of VFM report

2,420.00

ARUP — Consulting Engineers

Engineering report & conditional inspection of the West Wharf in Dunmore East FHC

5,536.36

Aquatic Services Unit Environmental Research Institute

Sediment sampling & Analysis Report for Dunmore East Fishery Harbour Centre

19,915.39

RPS Consulting Engineers

Dunmore East Sedimentation Study & Dredging Feasibility Report

18,634.00

MERC Consultants Marine Environmental Resource Conservation Consultants Ltd

Sediment sampling & Analysis Report for Howth Fishery Harbour Centre

20,920.90

HMRC, UCC, Cork

Wave Data Acquisition and Processing Report

7,865.00

HMRC, UCC, Cork

Computer Model of Harbour and Report

12,705.00

RPS Consulting Engineers

Coastal Protection Strategy Study- Phase 2 Report

5,929.00

Aquafact International

Ecological Assessment (Marine) for Doonloughan Pier,Co. Galway

5,747.50

Keville & O’Sullivan Associates

Ecological Assessment (Terrestrial) for Doonloughan Pier, Co. Galway

2,678.94

RPS Consulting Engineers

Coastal Protection Strategy Study — Phase 3 Report

261,194.53

ESPION

Quarterly IT security review report as required for EU Accreditation purposes

15,730

Veterinary Laboratories Agency

BSE Risk Analysis

4,594.85

Achilles Procurement Services LTD

Provision of advice & assistance in the preparation of tenders

317.63

Dr. Noel Cawley

Chair the Seafood Strategy Implementation Group established to oversee the implementation of the report on the seafood industry- Steering a New Course

56,305.00

Mazars

To assist & provide IT audit expertise to the Internal Audit Unit

46,797.00

Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd

Preparation of a Cost Benefit Analysis in respect of a proposed development at Dunmore East Fishery Harbour Centre

17,968.50

P.P. Ryan & Co Solicitors

Legal advice

559.63

Fitzpatrick Associates

EX-post Evaluation of the CAP Rural Development

36,965.50

Ray Burke Consulting

Development of a Business Plan for the Fishery Harbour centres

79,653.09

Surepath

Dangerous goods adviser

2,202.50

Morehampton Consultancy Services

Work on 2008-2011 IT Strategy

950.00

Grant Payments.

Bobby Aylward

Question:

248 Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will review the rate of grant awarded to a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny under the horticultural grant aid scheme with a view to having the full percentage of grant awarded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45907/08]

Under the Scheme of Investment aid for the development of Commercial Horticulture sector the standard rate of grant is 40%. The applicant, on the basis of being a young farmer, was provisionally approved for the higher rate of grant (50%) aid under the Scheme. This provisional approval was based on him being in a position to demonstrate, by the date he applied for payment of aid, that he was in control of financial management of the grant aided enterprise.

The applicant duly applied for payment and a pre-payment inspection was conducted by DAFF. At the time of inspection the applicant was not in a position to demonstrate control of financial management of the grant-aided enterprise. Therefore aid was paid at the standard rate with the right to appeal.

The applicant subsequently appealed and his case was fully reviewed by DAFF. This included a second farm visit by a different Inspector. Having assessed the appeal DAFF has concluded that the applicant is not entitled to the higher rate of aid. When he applied for payment, the applicant was not in control of financial management and consequently has been paid at the standard rate of 40% for the eligible investments.

School Staffing.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

249 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Education and Science the way the substitution and supervision scheme operates; if it is available to all schools; if the moneys are paid directly to teachers or to the school; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45674/08]

The details of the operation of the supervision and substitution scheme are outlined in Circular PPT 01/03. I have included a copy of the Circular for the information of the Deputy. The scheme is available to all primary and second level schools funded by my Department.

Permanent, temporary and part-time teachers employed in the school may volunteer at the commencement of the school year for supervision and substitution duties over the course of the year.

Wholetime volunteer teachers are required to contract to deliver a minimum of 37 hours supervision and substitution over the course of the school year. Part-time and job-sharing teachers who volunteer are required to deliver supervision and substitution on a pro-rata basis. This will cover both the supervision and substitution requirements of the school as determined by the school authorities following a consultation process. In the event that the full allocation of hours available to the school is not exhausted by the volunteers on the basis of the minimum commitments, the additional hours may be distributed among the volunteers, or any number thereof, on a pro-rata basis or as agreed locally, subject to a maximum allocation of 49 hours per annum, in the case of wholetime teachers, not being exceeded. In addition to the maximum allocation of 49 hours per annum, a part-time teacher may commit to the difference between the annual contracted part-time teaching hours with the school/VEC and 735 hours.

On the basis of the contractual arrangements outlined, teachers qualify for an annual payment. The annual payment for the 2008/2009 school year is €1,862 for undertaking 37 hours supervision and substitution. Teachers are paid an hourly rate of €50.34 from the 1st September, 2008 for undertaking the additional hours supervision. The payments are made direct to the teachers by my Department.

The process of seeking teacher volunteers (from amongst the permanent, temporary and part-time teachers employed by the school) may not produce enough school-based volunteers to cover the school's supervision and substitution needs. In such circumstances, school management may source and recruit personnel to provide supervision services before school, at break-times and after school, and (where substitute teachers are not available) supervision of classes where teachers are absent on uncertified sick leave or on other approved absences on school business.

Such personnel employed by the school as supervisors may be paid either on a casual basis or on a contract basis from funds provided by my Department based on the balance or proportion of the balance of the non-committed supervision and substitution hours. The hourly rate for supervisors who contract for the delivery of supervision services for the 2008/2009 school year is €22.43 per hour from the 1st September, 2008.

To: Management Authorities of second-level schools.

(i) Supervision of pupils during the morning and lunchtime breaks and before and after school

(ii) Extension of approved substitution to cover uncertified sick leave and Teachers’ absences from class because of other approved school activities (e.g. games, competitions and other extra-curricular activities).

1. Introduction

1.1 This Circular Letter replaces and supersedes Circular M 39/02. The Minister for Education and Science wishes to inform authorities of post-primary schools of the arrangements for the pensionability of supervision and substitution payments and restate and clarify the revised arrangements for supervision and substitution in second level schools. The purpose of this circular letter is:

(a) To advise schools regarding the new arrangements for paid supervision and substitution that will apply arising from agreement between the parties at the Teachers’ Conciliation Council.

(b) To set out the conditions that will apply to the pensionability of supervision and substitution payments.

(c) To outline to schools the funding/payment arrangements that will apply

(d) To confirm the extension of paid substitution

1.2 Context of the Agreement on paid Supervision and Substitution

Teachers are routinely involved in supervision of pupils in their care as part of their contractual duty of care in a variety of situations. Supervision of pupils in classes under their control is an integral part of teachers' professional duties and the contracts of employment. This proposal relates to supervision of students during periods that are not assigned to any teacher and which had previously been provided by teachers on a voluntary basis.

The paid substitution element of this agreement is intended to cover situations where a suitable substitute is not immediately available. This has, up to the present, generally involved other members of the teaching staff substituting/supervising for their absent colleagues on a voluntary basis. It is this substitution that is intended to be provided under the new paid supervision and substitution arrangements.

While the scheme envisages that supervision and substitution will be provided by teachers, the circular letter also makes provision for the situation, which may pertain in those schools where teachers are not available to carry out this work.

The scheme, which applies to all post-primary schools, is outlined below. Detailed operational guidelines specific to the three different sectors (Community and Comprehensive, VEC and Voluntary secondary schools) may be circulated by the relevant management authorities following consultation with the relevant teacher unions. The Department may also issue further elaboration/clarification as required.

2. Basis of Scheme for Supervision and Substitution

2.1 Schools will be allocated hours for supervision and substitution on the basis of 37 hours per wholetime teacher equivalent (WTE) per school year. The WTE figure used for the allocation of supervision and substitution hours will be based on the teacher allocation as on the 1st September each year to the school.

2.2 Hours will be allocated to VECs on the basis of the teacher allocation as on 1st September each year to the scheme.

2.3 Payment will be made in July of each year on the basis of certified delivery as provided in the scheme. The payment will be calculated by reference to the hourly rate, appropriately weighted to give proportionate effect to any increases in the rate in the school year ending on the 30th June preceding payment. It is intended that payment will be made through the normal payroll system on the basis of certification by the Principal or Board of Management/VEC in relation to the commitment entered into by each individual teacher and the actual hours delivered. Further discussions will be held with the parties on agreeing arrangements for an advance payment in December.

3. Contractual Arrangements for Teaching Staff

3.1 Permanent, temporary and part-time teachers employed in the school may volunteer at the commencement of the school year for supervision and substitution duties over the course of the year. A copy of the contract for permanent wholetime teachers is attached as Appendix 1. Other contracts will issue in due course.

3.2 Wholetime volunteers will be required to contract to deliver a minimum of 37 hours supervision and substitution over the course of the school year. Part-time and job-sharing teachers who volunteer will be required to deliver supervision and substitution on a pro-rata basis. This will cover both the supervision and substitution requirements of the school as determined by the school authorities following a consultation process. In the event that the full allocation of hours available to the school is not exhausted by the volunteers on the basis of the minimum commitments, the additional hours may be distributed among the volunteers, or any number thereof, on a pro-rata basis or as agreed locally, subject to a maximum allocation of 49 hours per annum, in the case of wholetime teachers, not being exceeded. In addition to the maximum allocation of 49 hours per annum, a part-time teacher may commit to the difference between the annual contracted part-time teaching hours with the school/VEC and 735 hours.

3.3 The supervision and substitution contract will provide that volunteers, who are wholetime teachers, will not normally be required to provide more than 1 hour 30 minutes per week on the contracted duties in a given week. However, the contract will provide that a teacher may agree to undertake contracted duties for more than 1 hour 30 minutes in a particular week on the request of the Principal. Additional time worked in such circumstances will be reckoned towards the total annual commitment.

3.4 The system of extra and separate payment for both supervision and substitution is for service in addition to normal class contact hours. Payment for supervision duties may not be made for periods within assigned timetabled class periods. In applying the system of additional and separate payments for both supervision and substitution the practice of timetabling teachers for these duties within normal teaching hours should cease. Similarly direct delivery of supervision and substitution duties should no longer form part of the duties of an Assistant Principal or Special Duties post.

3.5 On the basis of the contractual arrangements outlined above, teachers will qualify for additional annual payments, on the basis of an hourly rate of €37 w.e.f. 1 September 2002. Payment will be made on the basis of actual delivery. However, in the event that management does not demand delivery of the 37 contracted hours during the course of the school year, payment for the 37 hours contracted commitment will be made. Final payment on this basis will be made in July each year.

3.6 In the event of the allocation of hours to a school not being exhausted by the contractual arrangements the remaining hours may be used by the school to:

(i) pay teachers in addition to their contractual arrangements in respect of any additional casual supervision and substitution they provide, or

(ii) pay any other teacher, if no contracted teacher is available, to perform these duties on a casual basis.

4. Operational Arrangements for Supervision/Substitution

4.1 The Principal should consult with the volunteers in deciding on the timetable for supervision duties. Supervision duties should be timetabled over the course of the school year.

4.2 Residual hours available after the timetabling of supervision will be available for substitution. The specific arrangements for a substitution timetable should be made following consultation between management and teachers. The total time assigned to substitution and supervision may not exceed 1½ hours in any given week (save where otherwise agreed with the teacher). A commitment from teachers to be available for two timetabled class periods per week will form part of these arrangements.

Where, in any given week, a teacher is not called upon for substitution, the unmet commitment remains but is subject to a maximum delivery in any future week of 1½ hours within the two designated class periods (save where otherwise agreed with the teacher).

5. Pensionability of Supervision and Substitution Payments

5.1 Teachers who are in pensionable service and who give a commitment in writing to undertake supervision and substitution duties under a 37 hour contract on an ongoing basis to retirement will have the agreed payment made pensionable subject to the payment of contributions and the rules of the Superannuation Scheme. The pensionability of supervision and substitution payments for part-time teachers will be addressed in the context of the discussions on the Protection of Employees (Part-Time Work) Act 2001.

5.2 Serving teachers, in order to qualify for pensionability, shall make the necessary commitment on or before the 1st September 2004.

5.3 New teachers, in order to qualify for pensionability, shall make the necessary commitment within 12 months of first appointment. Details of teachers who have entered such a commitment should be notified to the Department of Education and Science in order that payment of the pension contribution can commence.

5.4 A teacher, who has entered such a commitment, but later ceases to meet the commitment, will forfeit pensionability and will not be allowed to re-enter such a commitment. The teacher will not, in such circumstances, be entitled to a refund of superannuation contributions paid in respect of supervision and substitution payments. Such teachers must advise their boards of management of their decision on or before the 30th June prior to the commencement of the relevant school year. However, this will not be a barrier to the provision of paid supervision and substitution on a casual basis.

5.5 Where teachers make an ongoing commitment, the commencement date for pensionability shall be the 1st September 2001 in the case of serving teachers who have delivered the appropriate service in each year since that date or the date of appointment in the case of new teachers. On entering the commitment teachers will be required to make the appropriate pension contribution with effect from these dates.

5.6 The pensionability of the supervision and substitution payment is restricted to the minimum commitment of 37 hours over the course of the year.

5.7 A teacher who is not entering a commitment to undertake supervision and substitution duties under a 37 hour contract on an ongoing basis to retirement may continue to provide supervision and substitution duties on a casual non-pensionable basis. Such teachers should advise their board of management of their availability on or before the 30th June preceding the next school year.

6. Supervision

6.1 School management has a responsibility to discharge its duty of care to pupils and to provide adequate supervision of pupils during the full period of time that schools are in operation.

6.2 Teachers are routinely involved in a variety of situations in the supervision of pupils in their care as part of their contractual duty of care. Supervision of pupils in classes under their control is an integral part of a teacher's professional duties and contract of employment. The issue being addressed in this scheme relates to supervision of students on the school premises outside of specified classroom teaching duties that has, up to the present, generally been provided by teachers on a voluntary basis. Under this scheme, the Department will make resources available to schools to provide supervision on a paid basis.

6.3 The supervisor in discharging his/her duty should take such care as to ensure the health and safety of the pupils as is reasonable in the circumstances.

7. Substitution

7.1 Substitution is the replacement of an absent teacher by another qualified teacher and substitution arrangements should aim to maximise appropriate teaching during substitution periods.

7.2 At present, the Department provides for paid substitution for specified approved teacher absences. In the case of absences for which paid substitution is available, schools normally employ a suitable qualified substitute as soon as possible to teach the subjects and classes of the absent teacher.

7.3 Under the terms of this agreement, the Department will now provide schools/VECs with resources to extend paid substitution for absences of teachers on uncertified sick leave, and other approved absences on school business, with a view to minimising the disruption of teaching programmes and improving the service to pupils. This substitution should be arranged in the normal way by the employment of a substitute teacher.

7.4 In addition, in order to facilitate school management in dealing with short-term unplanned or unexpected absences, teachers already employed by the school may commit to and be paid for casual substitution under the supervision and substitution arrangements set out in Paragraph 3 of this Circular. This does not alter the existing arrangements for part-time teachers to undertake duties as a substitute in the normal way.

8. Arrangements for Payment.

The following arrangements for payment have been agreed.

8.1 A claim form should be completed by each teacher who wishes to apply for payment. A copy of the claim form is attached as Appendix 11.

8.2 Valid claims should be certified by the Principal and retained in the school. The Principal of each school should notify the Department/VEC of the list of teachers eligible for payment on a composite claim form. The composite claim form will be forwarded to schools in due course.

8.3 The Department / VEC will arrange for payment of the teachers concerned through the teacher payroll system on receipt of the composite claim form.

8.4 Further discussions will be held with the parties on agreeing arrangements for an advance payment in December.

9. Supplementary Arrangements

9.1 The process of seeking teacher volunteers (from amongst the permanent, temporary and part-time teachers employed by the school) may not produce enough school-based volunteers to cover the school's supervision and substitution needs. In such circumstances, school management may source and recruit personnel to provide supervision services before school, at break-times and after school, and (where substitute teachers are not available) supervision of classes where teachers are absent on uncertified sick leave or on other approved absences on school business.

9.2 Such personnel employed by the school as supervisors may be paid either on a casual basis or on a contract basis from funds provided by the Department based on the balance or proportion of the balance of the non-committed supervision and substitution hours. Supervisors who contract for the delivery of supervision services will be remunerated at a weekly rate of €370 per week for which they will be expected to provide a minimum of ten hours and up to a maximum of twenty hours actual supervision per week. Supervision on a casual hourly basis or in excess of 20 hours for contracted staff in any week will be paid at a pro-rata rate.

9.3 These supplementary arrangements will continue to be kept under review in consultation with school management authorities.

10. Accounting Requirements

In the normal way each school/VEC will be required to keep records of the utilisation of the hours allocated under the supervision and substitution arrangements. Each school/VEC will also be required to provide a balancing statement showing the hours allocated, the hours certified for payment and expenditure on the employment of non teaching staff where applicable.

11. Review

The operation of the arrangements of this scheme will be monitored at national level throughout the year, and reviewed at the end of the school year, by a group representative of the parties to this agreement and may be revised as appropriate.

12. General

Queries regarding individual payments to teachers should be addressed to Post Primary Teachers Section in Athlone (Tel: 090-6474621).

Queries in relation to pensions should be addressed to Pensions Section (Tel: 090-6474621).

Queries in relation to school funding should be addressed to Post Primary Administration (Tel: 0506-24336).

13. Dissemination of Circular

Please provide a copy of this circular to the appropriate representatives of parents and teachers for transmission in the normal way.

John Dennehy

Secretary General

10th January 2003

Appendix I

Contract for Supervision and Substitution Duties

(permanent wholetime teachers)

A. I _________ hereby give a commitment to undertake supervision and substitution duties for 37 hours per school year on an ongoing basis to retirement in accordance with the terms of the Circular Letter PPT01/03. I understand that, should I cease to meet this commitment, pensionability will be forfeited and I will not be allowed to re-enter such a commitment.

or

B. I __________ hereby give a commitment to undertake supervision and substitution duties for 37 hours for the school year 2002/2003 in accordance with the terms of Circular Letter PPT 01/03. I understand that this is on a non-pensionable basis.

Signed ______________ Date ____

(Teacher)

Signed ______________ Date ____

(Principal/Board of Management)

Optional

C. In addition to the commitment to undertake substitution and supervision duties of 37 hours I undertake to provide additional casual supervision and substitution hours when available as and when the need arises.

Signed ______________ Date ____

(Teacher)

Signed ______________ Date ____

(Principal/Board of Management)

Appendix II

Claim for payment for voluntary Supervision/Substitution in the school year 2002/2003.

To: _____________________ Principal

From: ____________________Applicant

(Block Capitals)

In accordance with the terms of Circular Letter PPT 01/03 I hereby claim payment for voluntary Supervision/Substitution outside timetabled class contact hours on the basis that I have delivered on my contracted commitment of 37 hours over the course of the 2002/2003 school year.

In addition I hereby claim payment for an additional ___ non-pensionable hours which I delivered over and above my contracted commitment of 37 hours in the school year.

Signed: ______________ Applicant

Date: _____________

I certify that the above claim has been verified by reference to school records and is in accordance with the terms of Circular Letter PPT01/03.

Certified: __________________ Principal

Date: ____________

Schools Building Projects.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

250 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress achieved to date in respect of the tranche of school building projects, which includes a school (details supplied) in County Kildare; when this group of schools will proceed to detailed design and construction under his Department’s public private partnership programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45675/08]

The second Schools PPP bundle, which consists of six schools including the school referred to by the Deputy, was handed over to the National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) in May 2008. The NDFA advertised the bundle in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEC) on 20th May 2008.

This tender competition is being procured using the competitive dialogue procedure as provided for under Community Directive 2004/EC/18 and three Shortlisted Candidates were invited by the NDFA to commence the dialogue process on the 18th September 2008. During this process, the Candidates will develop their design and construction solutions as well as commercial proposals for each of the six schools. A number of formal meetings are underway with each of the Candidates to assess the developing solutions during the dialogue, at the end of which process the NDFA will then invite final, fixed price tenders. The expected timeframe for these final tenders is Summer 2009.

Following evaluation of the tenders received, an announcement on the appointment of the Preferred Tenderer being the most economical advantageous tender is anticipated in early autumn 2009 with construction expected to commence, subject to the planning process, in early 2010.

School Accommodation.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

251 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Education and Science if he has agreed a strategy with County Kildare VEC in relation to the future accommodation needs of a school (details supplied) in County Kildare; if he envisages the on site modernisation of the school or if it is intended to construct a new school on a green field site; if a suitable site has been identified; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45676/08]

The school to which the Deputy refers has applied to my Department for large scale capital funding for an extension project. No decision has been taken yet as to whether or not this can be provided within the confines of the existing site.

The progression of all large scale building projects, including this project, from initial design stage through to construction phase will be considered in the context of my Department's multi-annual School Building and Modernisation Programme. However, in light of current competing demands on the capital budget of the Department, it is not possible to give an indicative timeframe for the progression of the project at this time.

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Question:

252 Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Education and Science if he has agreed a strategy with County Kildare VEC in relation to the future accommodation needs of a school (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45677/08]

I can confirm that the school to which the Deputy refers has made an application to my Department for large scale capital funding for a new school building. The application has been assessed in accordance with the published prioritisation criteria for large scale building projects and assigned a band 2 rating.

The progression of all large scale building projects, including this project, from initial design stage through to construction phase will be considered in the context of my Department's multi-annual School Building and Modernisation Programme. However, in light of current competing demands on the capital budget of the Department, it is not possible to give an indicative timeframe for the progression of the project at this time.

Special Educational Needs.

Joe McHugh

Question:

253 Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will clarify the terms of reference laid down by the Teaching Council in respect of the process for addressing complaints against the special education needs organiser; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45689/08]

As the Deputy will be aware the Teaching Council Act 2001 provided for the establishment of a Council for the purposes of promoting teaching as a profession, maintaining and improving the standards of teaching, providing for the establishment of standards, policies and procedures for the education and training of teachers, and other matters relating to teachers and the teaching profession.

The Teaching Council do not have a role in addressing complaints against special education needs organisers.

Complaints against Special Education Needs Organisers should be addressed to the National Council for Special Education which employs the personnel in question. Any such complaint should be sent to the Council's head office at 1-2 Mill Street Trim Co. Meath.

Departmental Expenditure.

Leo Varadkar

Question:

254 Deputy Leo Varadkar asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of staff in terms of whole time equivalents he has allocated within his Department to support the Better Regulation group’s work; the financial resources that have been spent in support of such work to date in 2008; the expected expenditure for the remainder of 2008; the budget for 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45698/08]

There are no whole time equivalent staff engaged in support of the work of the Better Regulation Unit of the Department of An Taoiseach and there is no specific budget allocation in this area.

My Department is represented on a Working Group convened by the Department of An Taoiseach to bring together officials from each Government Departments and the Office of the Attorney General to share experience and develop best practice on conducting Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIA). The inaugural meeting was held in January 2007 and there have been a number of meetings to date. Participation in this Group takes place as part of the normal duties of the official in question.

My Department is also a member of the Department of An Taoiseach's RIA Network. The Network issues a regular RIA Bulletin, which is produced by the Better Regulation Unit of the Department of An Taoiseach and which is made available to staff of my Department via the Department's intranet.

My Department participates in periodic consultations of Government Departments by the Better Regulation Unit of the Department of An Taoiseach in relation to particular procedures, processes or practices concerning regulation.

The outcome of the Working Group in terms of the legislative process is implemented by the relevant business units of the Departments who are involved in the drafting of legislation as part of normal work practice.

School Staffing.

Michael Ring

Question:

255 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Education and Science the effects of budget 2009 cutbacks on a secondary school (details supplied) in County Mayo, particularly as the school has yet to be informed as to the situation they will face from 7 January 2009 thereafter; and if immediate clarification will be made on the effects of the budget to this school. [45716/08]

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

271 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Education and Science his views on whether increasing the pupil teacher ratio from 18:1 to 19:1 in a school (details supplied) in County Cork will result in the loss of teaching resources at the school; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45793/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 255 and 271 together.

The 2009 Budget required difficult choices to be made across all areas of public expenditure. These decisions were made to control public expenditure and to ensure sustainability in the long run. In this respect, the education sector, while protected to a much greater extent than most other areas of public expenditure, could not be totally spared. The various impacts at school level were included in the Budget day announcements. Even with the Budget measures in place there will still be a significantly increased borrowing requirement in 2009.

My Department will be advising individual schools in the normal way in relation to their staffing and grant allocations. The preparatory work for this has commenced with the processing of enrolment data that has been received from schools. The staffing allocation processes, including notification to schools, will commence early in the New Year. The allocation process includes appellate mechanisms under which schools can appeal against the allocation due to them under the staffing schedules. In addition to the mainstream classroom teachers, my Department also allocates teaching resources to schools for special needs and language support. The final allocation to a school is also a function of the operation of the redeployment panels, which provide for the retention of a teacher in an existing school if a new post is not available within the agreed terms of the scheme.

I have no difficulty in setting out for this House or for the public generally the overall changes on aggregate teacher numbers or on grant levels in schools for the 2009/10 school year. I will do this when the allocation processes have been completed. Furthermore, the staffing schedule will be published; it is a transparent and clear way of ensuring that schools are treated consistently and fairly and know where they stand.

At this time, the priority for my Department within the resources available to it is to carry out those processes in a timely manner. Diverting resources in order to compile either historic information or to create staffing or funding profiles for individual schools requested by the Deputies, information which at this time could only be speculative, could not be justified and would in fact impede the process.

John O'Mahony

Question:

256 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of whole time teacher equivalents employed in second level schools here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45722/08]

Significant improvements have been made in the staffing of our second level schools in recent years. In the 2001/2002 school year, there were approximately 24,477 wholetime equivalent teaching posts allocated to second level schools.

Currently there are 26,821 wholetime equivalent teaching posts allocated to second level schools. This figure is broken down as follows: 13,542 to voluntary secondary schools, 3,641 to community, 626 to comprehensive and 9,012 to Vocational Educational Committees.

Teacher allocations for second level schools are approved by my Department on an annual basis in accordance with generally applied rules based on recognised pupil enrolments on the 30th of September of the preceding school year.

Each school management authority is required to organise its curriculum, teaching time-table and subject options having regard to pupils' needs within the limits of its approved teacher allocation.

John O'Mahony

Question:

257 Deputy John O’Mahony asked the Minister for Education and Science the way the €2.7 million announced on 4 December 2008 for substitution will be divided among second level schools between January and June 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45723/08]

As a result of the 2009 Budget provisions for Education, arising from current economic challenges, and following subsequent proposals from the management bodies of post-primary schools, new arrangements are being put into place for substitution cover for uncertified sick leave for teachers in post-primary schools and for official school business in post-primary schools.

These arrangements are being put in place with effect from 1 January 2009 and will remain in place for the remainder of the 2008/09 school year while a review of the supervision/substitution 37 hour scheme and related matters takes place.

Each post-primary school will be provided with a defined number of hours of substitution cover outside of the supervision and substitution scheme to provide cover for teacher absences arising from uncertified sick leave and official school business. This will be calculated on the basis of the number of pupils in a school with a minimum number of available hours for all schools with less than 100 pupils.

Thus for the remainder of the school year there will be 16 hours substitution cover allocated for schools with 100 pupils or less, 32 hours for a 200 pupil school and 64 hours for a 400 pupil school, for example.

The implementation of the proposals made by the second-level management bodies will, over the balance of the current school year, provide a new basis for managing the use of substitution cover for school business and enable schools manage unpredictable teacher absences due to uncertified sick leave.

Special Educational Needs.

Paul Kehoe

Question:

258 Deputy Paul Kehoe asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding the proposed autistic specific unit catering for up to 12 children to be provided at a school (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45727/08]

I can confirm that the school to which the Deputy refers has applied to my Department for an extension project which includes accommodation for a special needs unit.

The application has been assessed in accordance with the published prioritisation criteria for large scale building projects and has been assigned a Band 1 rating which is the highest Band rating possible.

The progression of all large scale building projects, including this project, from initial design stage through to construction phase will be considered in the context of my Department's multi-annual School Building and Modernisation Programme. However, in light of current competing demands on the capital budget of the Department, it is not possible to give an indicative timeframe for the progression of the project at this time.

School Staffing.

Brian Hayes

Question:

259 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will quantify the savings which will be made by capping the number of language support teachers to two per school; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45736/08]

My Department's budget for next year has been prepared on the same fundamental basis as any other year by estimating the number of teachers that will be employed under the different categories given the policies in place, for example, mainstream classroom teachers, special needs and language support teachers and allowing for any change in overall demographics.

Specifically in relation to language support teachers the budget measures will mean that the level of language support will be reduced from a maximum of six extra teachers per school to a maximum of two teachers per school, as was the case before 2007. The full year saving is estimated at €6 million for every 100 teaching posts saved. My Department's estimate for the yield from the capping of language support posts is of the order of 350 posts saving up to €22 million in a full year. Apart from this policy change the ongoing requirement for current levels of language support teachers in schools should also start to reduce in line with lower levels of immigration and in line with improvements in the levels of proficiency of those pupils for whom this resource has been available.

The Deputy will appreciate that while the measure will only yield a portion of that saving in 2009 it is the full year that is most relevant given that the Government strategy is to manage the correction needed in the public finances over the coming years as distinct from the 2009 position alone.

Nonetheless, schools that require language support will still be entitled to get it. We still envisage having over 1,400 language support teachers in our schools in September 2009 and up to about 500 other teachers in part-time posts. By any standards this is a very significant resource and the challenge will be to ensure that it is used to maximum effect.

As I announced on budget day we will also provide for some alleviation for the position of those schools where there is a significant concentration of newcomer pupils as a proportion of the overall enrolment. This will be done on a case by case basis.

The allocation process for language support teachers is an annual one and existing provision is not rolled over automatically. Schools will be applying afresh in the spring and early summer of 2009 for the 2009/10 school year, based on their assessment of the prospective needs of existing pupils still in the school that need support and any new pupils that they are enrolling.

Departmental Schemes.

Brian Hayes

Question:

260 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will quantify the savings which will be made by suspending the early retirement scheme for teachers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45737/08]

My Department estimates that the cost of the Early Retirement Scheme in 2009 would have been €19m. This figure represents lump sum and pensions for new retirees in 2009. With the suspension of the scheme, it is likely that some teachers who would normally apply under the early retirement scheme will retire on other grounds. Therefore, it is estimated that the scheme's suspension will lead to a net saving of approximately €10m next year.

School Staffing.

Brian Hayes

Question:

261 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will quantify the savings which are to be made at primary and secondary school levels as a result of the increases in class size in budget 2009; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45738/08]

My Department's budget for next year has been prepared on the same fundamental basis as any other year by estimating the number of teachers that will be employed under the different categories given the policies in place, for example, mainstream classroom teachers, special needs and language support teachers and allowing for any change in overall demographics.

Specifically in relation to mainstream classroom teachers, the yield in savings that will result from the change in the primary staffing schedules will ultimately depend on the aggregate impact of the revised staffing schedule on the particular enrolment profile of all schools countrywide as of 30 September last and the operation of the panel system of redeployment. The full year saving is estimated at €6 million for every 100 teaching posts saved. My Department's estimating range for the yield from the staffing schedule adjustment for primary schools is 350- 500 posts saving up to €30 million in a full year. Since the potential yield from this reduction and from the policy changes giving reductions in posts will be offset by new posts due to demographic changes in some schools and the continued policy of allocating special needs posts through the work of the National Council for Special Education the net reduction from the primary sector is estimated to be of the order of 200 posts.

The position for the post-primary sector (i.e. across VEC, Community and Comprehensive schools and not just secondary schools) is that the changed allocation ratios could ultimately yield up to €64m in a full year. However, actual yield will depend on the functioning of a new redeployment scheme yet to be agreed and is also a factor of the extent to which in any locality it will be possible to match teachers that are surplus in some schools with vacancies in their subject specialisms in other schools. Accordingly, the measure will only work through over a number of years and for this reason the yield in 2009 is estimated at up to €8m. Again as is the case in the primary sector the net yield of 200 posts factors in other measures that will reduce the number of posts offset by increases largely related to the expansion of special needs provision elsewhere.

The Deputy will appreciate that while a measure will only yield a portion of that saving in 2009 it is the full year yield that is most relevant given that the Government strategy is to manage the correction needed in the public finances over the coming years as distinct from the 2009 position alone.

I have already put it on record that I have no difficulty in setting out for this House or for the public generally what the final impact is on the overall changes on aggregate teacher numbers in schools for the 2009/10 school year. I am not claiming in any way that there will be no impact on the staffing position in schools generally but this will vary from school to school and there will be schools where the number of teachers will remain the same.

I will set out the final position when the allocation processes have been completed. The allocation processes including notification to schools will commence early in the New Year. The allocation process includes appellate mechanisms under which schools can appeal against the allocation due to them under the staffing schedules. The final allocation to a school is also a function of the operation of the redeployment panels which provide for the retention of a teacher in an existing school if a new post is not available within the agreed terms of the scheme. The appellate process is particularly relevant at post-primary level where any specific curricular needs of the school concerned are considered. Also at post-primary there is no effective system wide redeployment scheme at present and this can mean that schools retain teachers, though over quota.

For the moment the priority for my Department is to move ahead with the allocation processes and begin the interaction with individual schools early in the New Year.

Schools Recognition.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

262 Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question No. 284 of 3 December 2008, if he will clarify his statement that Glasnevin is already served by two multi-denominational schools; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the only other multi-denominational school in Glasnevin is full, has long waiting lists and is unable to meet local demand; his views on whether there is an undisputed established demand for a school (details supplied) in this area in view of its long waiting lists; and if, in view of same, he will grant permanent recognition to this school. [45741/08]

Multi-denominational schools serve a broad demographic area. On this basis, my Department considers that the North city, including Glasnevin, is served by two multi-denominational schools namely the North Dublin National School Project and Dublin 7 Educate Together NS.

The Department accepted the argument made by the proposers of the school in question that there was a need for a separate multi-denominational school to serve the Clontarf/ Marino/Fairview area of Dublin and the school was given temporary recognition on the basis that the Patron would secure suitable accommodation in that area to meet this need. To date, the Patron has not been able to do this and the school is currently located on a temporary basis in premises outside the Clontarf/Marino/Fairview area. It continues to be my Department's intention to re-locate this school to that area if and when suitable accommodation becomes available and as the funding situation allows.

If there is a need for further multi-denominational school places in the Glasnevin area, my Department will explore how these can be provided in the context of the pre-existing schools, which is in accordance with normal procedures in these matters.

School Staffing.

Brian Hayes

Question:

263 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of certified and uncertified sick days taken by his Department in each year over the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45771/08]

The information requested by the Deputy is outlined in the tabular statement. Details of sick leave of officials at the Department of Education & Science 2005 to 2007.

Year

Uncertified sick leave days

Average No. of days per employee

Certified sick leave (excluding long-term sick leave)*

Average No. of days per employee

Total certified sick leave days

Average No. of days per employee

2005

1,399.8

1.07

7,424.13

5.8

11,406.13

8.7

2006

1,310.97

1.02

8,400.19

6.7

12,339.19

9.6

2007

1,565.53

1.25

9,578.28

7.5

13,902.28

10.6

*Defined as more than 3 months.

Brian Hayes

Question:

264 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason the number of teachers participating in in-service training and courses has reduced from a high in 2006 of 217,816 hours to 108,787 hours in 2008 in terms of the total in-service attendance; the further reason there has been such a reduction in the number of hours provided by his Department for in-service training and attendance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45776/08]

As stated in the response to the previous question from Deputy Hayes in relation to inservice participants, the figure used by the Deputy for 2008 refers to the number of participant days up to the 31/08/08 rather than the number of hours of inservice. The full year figure will obviously be much higher than this. In service participants will however be lower in 2008 than 2006 and this can be put down to two main factors:

(1) The former Primary Curriculum Support Programme has completed its intensive phase of inservice following the introduction of the revised primary curriculum. As part of the schedule of support for the revised curriculum which began in 1999 and was completed in 2007, subject areas were catered for annually with up to six days per year for whole staff training. From September 2008, the first steps were taken toward the creation of a cohesive single professional development support service for the primary sector. The new service, while continuing to provide professional development programmes in response to system priorities, will be primarily concerned with the provision of customised support to schools and teachers.

(2) In 2008, due to Easter falling early there was a much shorter first term than usual. As in service seminars generally don't take place in the third term, after Easter, this will contribute to a reduction in overall numbers for 2008.

Departmental Correspondence.

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

265 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Education and Science his views on the issues raised in correspondence (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45779/08]

Fergus O'Dowd

Question:

266 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Education and Science his views on the issues raised in correspondence (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45780/08]

Seán Ardagh

Question:

267 Deputy Seán Ardagh asked the Minister for Education and Science his views on concerns expressed in correspondence from the principal of a school (details supplied); if he will respond to their concerns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45781/08]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 265 to 267, inclusive, together.

I am aware of the concerns raised by the schools referred to by the Deputies. The Government's commitment to education is clear both from its track record over the past decade in providing substantial additional resources, most notably extra teachers to meet previously unmet needs and from the programme the Government set for itself when it came into office. A lot has changed in the past year and the first and foremost imperative is that we stabilise the public finances. It is only by doing so that we can shelter gains made and put ourselves in the position of being able to make improvements in the future.

However we are dealing with an economic situation of unprecedented difficulty. The Government has a collective duty to respond to this and to take very difficult decisions in the national interest. In doing this we have attempted to afford some shelter to the education sector but given the scale of public expenditure on education it is simply not possible to avoid tough decisions. The various impacts at school level were included in the Budget day announcements. Even with the budget measures in place there will still be a significantly increased borrowing requirement in 2009.

I fully accept that these decisions are not of themselves desirable and that they can only be justified by the imperative of securing the future economic stability of the country. I have called for co-operation from all the education partners in meeting the challenges facing us both as an education community and as a country.

I am confident that as the global economy improves it will be possible to build again on the significant achievements of recent years and do so in a manner consistent with overall prudent management of the Irish economy.

Schools Building Projects.

Jimmy Deenihan

Question:

268 Deputy Jimmy Deenihan asked the Minister for Education and Science when €30,000 for unavoidable extra cost in the delivery of a six classroom extension to a school (details supplied) in County Limerick will be granted to the board of management; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45782/08]

In 2007 the school in question received approval to build 5 additional classrooms and 2 resource rooms under the devolved Permanent Accommodation Scheme (PAS) and was allocated €720,000 for the project.

The purpose of the PAS is to devolve funding to individual school authorities to undertake building works which will address the school's long term accommodation needs. Under the terms of the Scheme, school authorities are empowered to manage these works with guidance from and minimal interaction with the Department. Devolving funding to school management authorities allows them to have control of their projects, assists in moving projects more quickly to tender and construction and can also deliver better value for money.

The scheme is not intended to leave schools with significant fundraising needs; rather the terms of the Scheme require the schools to tailor the scope of capital works commissioned to the available funding. The decision on whether to continue participating in the scheme or to drop out, if the scope of build is more than the funding envelope permits, is a matter for each school authority.

The Board of Management submitted an appeal for additional funding which was rejected. Following a re-assessment of the appeal it was decided to approve additional funding for the project. Arrangements have been made to have the additional funding transferred to the schools bank account.

Home Tuition Grants.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

269 Deputy Emmet Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason home tuition payments for October and November 2008 due to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare in respect of their child have not been paid. [45787/08]

I am making enquiries into the matter and will arrange for officials in my Department to contact the Deputy directly with an update in this regard.

School Staffing.

Ciaran Lynch

Question:

270 Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will provide for substitution cover in respect of uncertified sick leave and outside activities such as sport and field trips which count towards a student’s leaving certificate projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45790/08]

As a result of the 2009 Budget provisions for Education, arising from current economic challenges, and following subsequent proposals from the management bodies of post-primary schools, new arrangements are being put into place for substitution cover for uncertified sick leave for teachers in post-primary schools and for official school business in post-primary schools.

These arrangements are being put in place with effect from 1 January 2009 and will remain in place for the remainder of the 2008/09 school year while a review of the supervision/substitution 37 hour scheme and related matters takes place.

Each post-primary school will be provided with a defined number of hours of substitution cover outside of the supervision and substitution scheme to provide cover for teacher absences arising from uncertified sick leave and official school business. This will be calculated on the basis of the number of pupils in a school with a minimum number of available hours for all schools with less than 100 pupils.

Thus for the remainder of the school year there will be 16 hours substitution cover allocated for schools with 100 pupils or less, 32 hours for a 200 pupil school and 64 hours for a 400 pupil school, for example.

The implementation of the proposals made by the second-level management bodies will, over the balance of the current school year, provide a new basis for managing the use of substitution cover for school business and enable schools manage unpredictable teacher absences due to uncertified sick leave.

Question No. 271 answered with Question No. 255.

Psychological Service.

Brian Hayes

Question:

272 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science when a person (details supplied) in County Dublin will obtain a psychological assessment, as this child has some behavioural issues which need to be assessed and the mother of this child is not in a position to provide a private assessment; the expected timeframe involved for an assessment in this case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45800/08]

I can inform the Deputy that NEPS, in common with many other psychological services and best international practice, encourages a staged assessment process, whereby each school takes responsibility for initial assessment, educational planning and remedial intervention, in consultation with their assigned NEPS psychologist. Only if there is a failure to make reasonable progress in spite of the school's best efforts, will a child be referred for individual psychological assessment. This system allows the psychologists to give early attention to urgent cases and also to help many more children indirectly than could be seen individually. It also ensures that children are not referred unnecessarily for psychological intervention.

Might I suggest that the Deputy advise the parent(s) of the child in question to raise the issue with the school principal who may then consult the assigned NEPS psychologist with a view to pursuing the matter further. I am aware that the psychologist in question will be visiting the school shortly after the Christmas break.

School Staffing.

Brian Hayes

Question:

273 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science if he will confirm that a circular was recently sent from his Department to every school in the country regarding a new daily rate of pay for retired inspectors who agree to sit on interview boards in respect of various positions for which an interview is organised; if this circular stated that the daily rate per retired inspector-official has gone from €145 per day to €260 per day and that the full cost of this must be paid by the school in question; the justification in the context of education cutbacks where schools have to meet this increased cost; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45801/08]

Retired inspectors who sit on interview boards for teachers in VEC and community and comprehensive schools are paid at a daily rate in accordance with the Department of Finance approved rate of payment to retired civil servants engaged to serve on interview boards. VECs and community and comprehensive schools were advised by my Department in July 2008 of an increase in the rate, with effect from 1 January 2008, from €161 to €282 per day.

The Deputy should note that the fee is payable only to interview board members who are not in public sector employment.

Schools Refurbishment.

Jack Wall

Question:

274 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Education and Science when the applications for qualification in respect of the summer works scheme 2009 be available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45807/08]

Since the Summer Works Scheme was introduced, over 3,000 projects, costing in excess of €300 million, have been completed. With so many smaller projects having been completed over the past few years, the particular emphasis in 2008 has been on providing sufficient school places in developing areas, while also delivering improvements in the quality of existing primary and post-primary school accommodation throughout the country. Accordingly my Department has focused on delivering as many large projects as possible in 2008 and funding was not made available for a Summer Works Scheme this year.

However, I recognise the benefits of the scheme in addressing the needs of schools and I have previously informed the house of my intention to have a Summer Works Scheme in 2009. The details of the operation of the scheme in 2009 and the level of funding to be made available under the scheme in 2009 are currently being considered and will be completed as soon as possible. The Professional and Technical Reports provided by schools for 2008 can be used again for future projects so that schools will not be at the loss of expenditure on them.

Jack Wall

Question:

275 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding an application for funding to carry out works to ensure the safety of the pupils and also to ensure the protection of the school building at a school (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45808/08]

The school in question submitted an application to my Department for emergency funding.

Emergency works grants are made available to schools most in need of resources as a result of unforeseen emergencies of a capital nature that may arise during the school year.

Following assessment of the application from this school and in light of the large number of projects seeking funding from my Department for works of this nature from the budget allocated, unfortunately, it was not possible to provide funding under the Emergency Works Scheme on this occasion for the works sought.

Early Childhood Education.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

276 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made in implementing the Síalta programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45822/08]

Síolta, the National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education was developed by the Centre for Early Childhood Development and Education following widespread consultation with the sector and has met with strong acceptance throughout the sector. The implementation of Síolta is now managed by my Department's Early Years Education Policy Unit. The Unit is co-located with the Office of the Minister for Children.

Two former staff of the CECDE have joined the Early Years Education Policy Unit to assist with the implementation of Síolta. The Unit is working closely with the Prevention and Early Intervention programmes co-funded by the Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs and Atlantic Philanthropies on the implementation of Síolta in early childcare centres in these areas. My Department also secured Dormant Accounts funding for a pre-school initiative in pre-schools in DEIS Band 1 areas that supported Síolta standards in the following areas:

Initiatives to involve and support parents

Initiatives that support the inclusion of children with special educational needs

Initiatives that support the inclusion of children from minority ethnic groupings

Initiatives that foster successful transitions from home to preschool

Initiatives that foster successful transitions from preschool to primary school.

My Department will also be working closely with the National Voluntary Childcare Organisations and other existing structures within the childcare sector on the implementation of Síolta.

Grant Payments.

Jan O'Sullivan

Question:

277 Deputy Jan O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science if discussions have taken place between his Department and representatives of Protestant post-primary schools to address the budget 2009 decision to alter the agreement made at the time of the introduction of free second-level education (details supplied); the provision that will be made to ensure that Protestant parents of limited means do not have to send their children to schools whose ethos is of a different denomination; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45824/08]

I met with representatives of the Church of Ireland Board of Education, led by Archbishop John Neill, on 13 November last.

The meeting provided me with an opportunity to explain at first hand the context for the budget changes that were of concern to the Bishops and the schools serving the Church of Ireland and other minority churches. In the course of the meeting, I confirmed my budget day announcement that the funding provided through the Protestant Block grant was being continued by the Government. I explained that against a backdrop of a difficult economic and fiscal situation I had to take decisions that impacted on the staffing and the range of funding grants to schools generally. The decision to cease paying certain grants to the Protestant fee charging schools, that were not paid to other fee charging schools, has to be viewed in that wider context.

It was inevitable in the difficult financial circumstances that the education budget for 2009 could not be totally spared from the need to curtail expenditure but it is important to reiterate again that the Protestant Block Grant which in the current school year amounts to €6.25 million will continue to be available and the retention of this grant demonstrates the importance that I, and this Government, continue to attach to ensuring that students of the Protestant faith can attend schools that reflect their denominational ethos. Historically this payment covers capitation, tuition and boarding grants and is distributed through the Secondary Education Committee established by the Churches concerned.

I fully appreciate the concerns that were expressed to me about the needs of the dispersed minority population and the particular need to sustain schools in the Protestant tradition that are directly serving that dispersed population in particular areas of the country. In that regard I expressed my willingness at the meeting to respond positively to any proposals that might be made to my Department that would enable the available funding to be focused and adjusted to more effectively meet the twin objectives of access for individuals and sustaining the dispersed schools that they wish to attend. The Bishops indicated that they would reflect on how the funding I am continuing to make available might best be deployed to meet the needs of their schools.

Further meetings can be scheduled at any point to develop and build on what I believe was a useful and constructive discussion.

Consultancy Contracts.

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

278 Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Education and Science the position regarding all contracts for the years 2007 and 2008 with consultants in relation to the preparation of reports of any kind; the name of the consultants; the cost for each report; and if he will provide this information in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45849/08]

The information requested by the Deputy is contained in the following tables.

2007

Name of Consultant

Cost

System Dynamics Solutions Ltd

13,310.00

Mary Immaculate College

73,000.00

Eustace Patterson Ltd

52,060.25

Phoenix Safety

4,803.70

Horwath Consulting Ireland Ltd

80,525.50

Indecon

78,200.00

Certification Europe Ltd

15,246.00

Deloitte & Touche

27,860.25

Eco-Unesco

23,305.00

Sonas Consulting Ltd

24,180.00

Road Plan Consulting Limited

2,420.00

JM Consulting Ltd

21,297.83

Pat Ryan

17,673.56

Maire Uí Mhaicín

812.64

Dr. Nigel Quirke-Bolt

1,050.00

Sean McCann

7,006.52

Professor Iseult McCarthy

16,306.28

2008 (to end October)

Name of Consultant

Total Cost

Professor Iseult McCarthy

14,096.46

Sean McCann

3,853.33

John McGinty

14,424.22

Patrick Dowling

18,223.92

Pat Ryan

16,196.91

Horwath Consulting Ire Ltd

29,474.50

Eco Unesco

23,305.00

Deloitte & Touche

27,860.25

Bearing Point

26,379.69

Centre for Cross Border Studies

6,030.00

Norcontel (Ireland) Ltd

56,958.19

Norcontel (Ireland) Ltd

57,414.50

Name of Consultant

Individual or Firm

Cost (fees + expenses)

Basis of Calculation (fees)

Report Commissioned Y/N?

Date of Publication of Report

System Dynamics Solutions Ltd

Firm

13,310.00

Daily rate of €1,100

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

Insight Statistical Consultancy

Firm

4,970.68

Tender Process

N

n/a

Mary Immaculate College

Firm

73,000.00

Tender Process

Y

November 2007

Eustace Patterson Ltd

Firm

52,060.25

Daily Rate of €850.00 + expenses

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

Phoenix Safety

Firm

4,803.70

€745.00 daily

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

Horwath Consulting Ireland Ltd

Firm

80,525.50

Tender Process

Y

Summer 2008

Indecon

Firm

78,200.00

Tender Process

Y

To be published by EU Commission in 09/08

Core International

Firm

1,167.65

Daily rate of €815.00 + expenses

N

n/a

Certification Europe Ltd

Firm

15,246.00

Tender Process

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

Deloitte & Touche

Firm

27,860.25

Fixed price quoted for task

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

McDowell Purcell Partnership

Firm

2,541.00

Fee of €2,000 for advice

N

n/a

Eco-Unesco

Firm

23,305.00

Tender Process

Y

Expected mid 2008

OLM Consultancy

Firm

9,307.00

Tender Process

N

n/a

Sonas Consulting Ltd

Firm

24,180.00

Tender Process

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

Road Plan Consulting Limited

Firm

2,420.00

Fixed price quoted for task

Y

Not for publication. Internal use.

JM Consulting Ltd

Firm

21,297.83

Daily rate of Stg £1,100

Y

February 2008

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Firm

37,500

Daily Rate Stg£725 (Snr), Stg£440 (Jnr)

N

n/a

Pat Ryan

Individual

17,673.56

Pre-arranged Fee of €14,000 + mileage

Y

Internal use

Conor Feeney

Individual

2,500.00

Once off payment for services

N

n/a

Maire Uí Mhaicín

Individual

812.64

€203.16 daily

Y

Internal use

Dr. Nigel Quirke-Bolt

Individual

1,050.00

€210.00 daily

Y

Internal use

Sean McCann

Individual

7,006.52

€250.00 daily

Y

Unpublished to-date

Professor Iseult McCarthy

Individual

16,306.28

€350.00 daily

Y

Unpublished to-date

Total Firms:

471,694.86

Total Individuals:

45,349.00

Overall Total:

517,043.86

Year 2008 (to end October)

Name of consultant

Purpose

Total Cost

Professor Iseult McCarthy

Review thresholds re award of higher level qualification allowance for specialist teachers

14,096.46

Sean McCann

Review thresholds re award of higher level qualification allowance for specialist teachers

3,853.33

John McGinty

Review of Co-operation Hours Committee meetings

14,424.22

Patrick Dowling

Review Co-operation hours with other institutions

18,223.92

Insight Statistical Consultancy

Analysis of Dept’s Guidance Questionnaire for Senior Cycle Students in Post primary Schools 2006/2007

4,970.68

Pat Ryan

Review of Co-operation Hours Committee meetings

16,196.91

Arthur O’Hagan Solicitors

Professional fee for Section 105 Inquiry re Peter Gargan 1/01/07 to 25/04/08

5,656.75

Horwath Consulting Ire Ltd

Development of a National English Language Policy & Framework for Legally Resident Adult Immigrants

29,474.50

Eco Unesco

Development of an education for sustainable development strategy

23,305.00

Sean Connolly

Member of Steering Group — Review of Service Delivery Capacity of IT Unit

1,566.00

Deloitte & Touche

Review of the Service Delivery Capacity of the IT Unit

27,860.25

Bearing Point

Learner Database Advisory Project

26,379.69

Centre for Cross Border Studies

Research/report on Southern Postgraduate Students attending NI Higher Ed. Instutions

6,030.00

ESRI

Provide assistance in identifying the geocordinates of a number of outstanding schools

2,359.50

Norcontel (Ireland) Ltd

Programme Evaluator — Schools Broadband Access Programme

56,958.19

Norcontel (Ireland) Ltd

Technical,commercial & financial advice — Schools Broadband Access Programme

57,414.50

Colgan & Associates

Provide research services re set up process for Special Education Appeals Board

31,780.00

Total Cost

340,549.90

School Enrolment.

Bernard J. Durkan

Question:

279 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science if suitable second level placement in main stream education will be found to facilitate a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; the way this child’s needs can be met in view of the extensive inquiries already made by their parents to date without success; if it is possible to meet their requirements within reach of their home in any of the adjoining second level schools; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45862/08]

The question of enrolment in individual schools is the responsibility of the managerial authority of those schools. The Department's main responsibility is to ensure that schools in an area can, between them, cater for all pupils seeking places. This may result, however, in some pupils not obtaining a place in the school of their first choice.

It is the responsibility of the managerial authorities of schools to implement an enrolment policy in accordance with the Education Act. In this regard a Board of Management may find it necessary to restrict enrolment to children from a particular area or a particular age group or, occasionally, on the basis of some other criterion. This selection process and the enrolment policy on which it is based must be non-discriminatory and must be applied fairly in respect of all applicants.

In 1993, the Department issued a circular (M 51/93) to post-primary schools, advising of a memorandum of agreement between the Department and the post-primary schools managerial association, that selection for the purposes of enrolment based on academic ability should be discontinued.

Under section 15(2)(d) of the Education Act 1998, each school is legally obliged to disclose its enrolment policy and to ensure that as regards that policy that principles of equality and the right of parents to send their children to a school of the parents choice are respected.

Section 29 of the Education Act 1998, provides parents with an appeal process where a Board of Management of a school or a person acting on behalf of the Board refuses enrolment to a student. Where a school refuses to enrol a pupil, the school is obliged to inform parents of their right under Section 29 of Education Act 1998 to appeal that decision to either the relevant Vocational Educational Committee or to the Secretary General of my Department. In the case of the latter, only where an appeal under Section 29 is upheld can the Secretary General of my Department direct a school to enrol a pupil.

I understand that an appeal under Section 29 of the Education Act has recently been taken on behalf of this student, and that a determination in respect of this appeal has now been issued to the child's parents.

The National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) is the statutory agency which can assist parents who are experiencing difficulty in securing a school place for their child. The NEWB advises parents to apply to more than one school in order to assist in securing a school placement. The Board can be contacted at National Educational Welfare Board, National Headquarters, 16-22 Green Street, Dublin 7 or by telephone at 01-8738700.

Top
Share