Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 13 Jan 2011

Vol. 726 No. 2

Order of Business

It is proposed to take No. 1, Communications Regulation (Postal Services) Bill 2010 [Seanad] — Second Stage. Private Members’ business shall be No. 84, motion re water utilities (resumed), to be taken after the Order of Business, and shall, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion after 90 minutes.

There are no proposals to put to the House today.

To raise a brief point, while there are no proposals the Tánaiste has nevertheless indicated the ordering of business for today in respect of the Communications Regulation (Postal Services) Bill 2010. Sinn Féin Deputies object to the facilitation of this proposal. This legislation will spell the unravelling of our postal services and An Post, threaten the existing service to rural Ireland and put jobs at risk. We strongly object to the proposition, even if I cannot——

The Order of Business is the prerogative of the Taoiseach.

——call a vote on it.

In respect of the communications legislation on today's Order Paper, I assume the Taoiseach has communicated to the Tánaiste the position arising from the question Deputy Ó Caoláin asked yesterday about attendance at a function in Druid's Glen. I ask her whether the Taoiseach gave her a full account of the matter and if she is happy to accept what he has said.

We spent a considerable amount of time on this matter yesterday.

Perhaps we will return to it next week as well.

I listened to what the Deputy had to say on yesterday's "Six One News". The Taoiseach dealt with all these issues in the House yesterday, I fully support his version of what happened and, moreover, others outside of politics have indicated what discussions took place on that occasion. If the Deputy does not believe the truth, that is a sad reflection on a man who purports to be the next Taoiseach.

I thank the Tánaiste for her comments. We now know that she, at least, accepts what she heard in this Chamber. However, the position appears to be that Mr. Gray, who was referred to as attending that function, was invited for another reason, about which he was very clear.

He was invited formally to discuss opportunities and potential for small business, job creation and other aspects of the economy. The Taoiseach said he was there to have a chat with friends.

If Deputy Kenny wishes to pursue this matter, we will have to find a recognised procedure for doing that.

Every time I stand up, the Ceann Comhairle is off his mark within ten seconds.

No. It is a matter of——

Yesterday he allowed the Taoiseach to respond for 11 minutes without interruption——

I extend the same——

——after he read out the rules.

My point is that Mr. Alan Gray has a very different view from what was said in this House yesterday. The Taoiseach said he was shooting the breeze, having a chat with people and that it was purely a social evening. Mr. Gray was invited to what appeared to be a formal meeting to give his views on job creation, small business, the economy and incentives for employment, which would be a very worthwhile discussion in its own right. However, Mr. FitzPatrick said publicly on a number of occasions that his favourite source of investment advice was the Financial Times website and The Economist but that for the real McCoy——

If Deputy Kenny is going to pursue this matter, we will have to find another way——

——one cannot beat the 19th hole on the golf course.

It is entirely inappropriate for the Order of Business.

Is the Tánaiste satisfied there is now a direct contradiction between what the Taoiseach said yesterday and what Mr. Gray said last night?

As a woman, does she feel she should take up golf? It is clearly where the power is.

I will not allow a discussion to develop on this matter on the Order of Business. I call the Tánaiste for a brief reply.

The Taoiseach dealt with this matter yesterday and I will not add to it.

End of story.

I wish to raise a number of issues relating to the Order of Business. The Order of Business before us is pathetic. What is going on in this Chamber this morning is frankly surreal. People in this country are struggling to survive, want to get back to work and have been hit with a big whack of an increase in Vhi premiums on top of the damage done to their pay packets and incomes this month. More than anything else people want to get things moving again and to see some recovery and hope.

Before Christmas the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, said:

. . . . .we have now reached a point where the Irish people needed political certainty to take them beyond the coming two months. So, we believe it is time to fix a date for a general election in the second half of January 2011.

We were told we were coming back yesterday to deal with the Finance Bill but when we came back we were told it was not only the Finance Bill but that there were four Bills. There are now 21 Bills. Even this morning the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources has found another straw at which to clutch to try to prolong the life of the Government. He wants to send the leaders of the Opposition away somewhere on St. Patrick's Day — any excuse to delay the recovery this country needs.

The Taoiseach does not have credibility. He was at a dinner with people from Anglo Irish Bank and they did not discuss the bank. He played golf with the chairman of Anglo Irish Bank and they did not discuss the bank and they had dinner afterwards and discussed lending to small business.

This is inappropriate to the Order of Business.

It reminds me of what Micheál Ó Muircheartaigh said about hurling in Fermanagh and the Fiji Islands. Anglo Irish Bank was hardly noted for lending to small business. We have a Taoiseach who lacks credibility, a Government, many of whose members are not standing for re-election——

If Deputy Gilmore is going to pursue this vein of contribution, we will have find a way——

I want to know from the Tánaiste the Government's timetable for the legislation we were told would be taken. We need to have some certainty and clarity about the timetable for the completion of the legislation that arises from the budget. We also need an assurance from the Government that it will not find one excuse after the other to delay the inevitable, that is, the fresh start, people getting back to work and getting the country working again which can happen only with the election of a new Government.

This matter was outlined by the Taoiseach yesterday. He indicated that once the Finance Bill was completed in the spring of this year, the dissolution of the House would occur.

I refer the Deputy to the EUROSTAT figures this morning which show Irish growth is the fastest among eurozone members.

It is not growth in jobs.

Stabilising Exchequer returns, strong export performance, high levels of foreign direct investment and improving competitiveness are all helping Ireland to create high quality jobs and return to sustainable growth——

(Interruptions).

One speaker at a time.

——with huge increases. Therefore, it is important to reiterate to the people that, as a consequence of the decisions made by this Government, the domestic economy is showing strong signs of return to growth and the four year plan is a credible way in which we can move forward.

Despite everything.

I asked a question about the Order of Business. Yesterday the Chief Whip published a list of legislation, some of which is legislation about which the Government has been distinctly unenthusiastic for the past three years. Suddenly it is very important and must be enacted before the general election.

Will the Tánaiste answer the following question clearly? Will she list the legislation the Government intends, or wishes, to enact before the dissolution of the Dáil and set out a timetable for the handling of that legislation? It is not a difficult question and it is perfectly in order on the Order of Business. It is particularly relevant given the commitment from Government before Christmas that there would be a dissolution of the Dáil before the end of January.

Four pieces of legislation are pertinent to the budget, namely, the Public Service Pensions (Single Scheme) Bill, the Betting (Amendment) Bill, the Social Welfare Bill and the Finance Bill. Those pieces of legislation will give legislative effect to the budgetary decisions.

Why are they not in the Finance Bill like always?

The Social Welfare Bill is introduced on its own.

It is not a miscellaneous Bill.

If Deputy Stagg, as a whip, wants to show disregard to the legislative process, that is a matter for him. Those are the pieces of legislation pertinent to the budget. Other pieces of legislation, which are important, will be considered by both Houses while these pieces of legislation are going through the normal process. That legislation has been outlined by the Chief Whip. It will depend on how long it takes the other pieces of legislation to be considered.

I am just looking for clarity. Am I to understand from that answer that the only legislation the Government intends to enact before the dissolution of the Dáil are the four pieces the Tánaiste outlined and that the other legislation referred to will be stuck in here, there or wherever to fill the order but that it is not necessarily the Government's intention to have them enacted before the dissolution of the Dáil?

The Deputy knows well that is not the situation. There is legislation before the House today which will be enacted before the budgetary legislation is completed. Many other pieces of legislation are on Committee and Report Stages in this House and they will be dealt with as well.

I am sorry——

We need to move on.

I am just looking for clarity. I will keep this simple. We were told the House would come back after Christmas to deal with the legislation which arose from the budget. We expected that to be one piece of legislation, namely, the Finance Bill. The Government has now widened that. We have been told four pieces of legislation must be enacted arising from the budget.

In terms of the commitment made before Christmas by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, and the Taoiseach that the recall of the Dáil after Christmas would be to deal with the legislation arising from the budget, if those four pieces of legislation are enacted, is that it? I understand what the Tánaiste said, that the Government will shove in other legislation here and there, but are they the only four pieces of legislation the Government intends to enact? Can we have a timetable for those four Bills? Last week we were given a draft or indicative timetable for the Finance Bill, which showed that Bill, as I understood it, concluding in the Seanad at the end of February. What is the timetable for the other Bills? The game being played is that we are back dealing with the legislation arising from the budget. Before Christmas it was due to be done by the end of January. When we got the timetable the end of January became the end of February. Then people were told that it would be the end of March and now I understand it is April, so this is being dragged out. It is not just that the general election is being delayed by the Government; the recovery of the country is being delayed by this crowd staying in office well past its sell-by date.

I have indicated to the Deputy the facts of the situation. It is a matter for and the prerogative of the Taoiseach to decide the date of a general election. The dissolution of the House will take place on the completion of consideration by both Houses of the Oireachtas of the finance legislation that must be introduced to give legislative effect to budgetary matters. It is completely disingenuous and disrespectful not only to Members on this side of the House but to Opposition Members who are very anxious that other legislation is not just slotted in as the Deputy says,——

We will do it ourselves, if the Tánaiste and her colleagues get out of the way.

——but is enacted appropriately on the basis that we need it.

They are like bed blockers.

I have nothing further to add to this matter. It has been outlined by the Taoiseach and by me and, I might say, done outside the parameters of what is purported to be the Order of Business.

When the Taoiseach hears the first cuckoo he will call the general election.

Is that before or after he has gone cuckoo?

He is waiting for a letter to The Irish Times.

A Deputy

Could there be a stretch in the evenings?

Does the Tánaiste still have unreserved confidence in her Taoiseach?

Does she still maintain——

We spent considerable time on this matter yesterday.

——as she has done in recent days——

It is inappropriate to raise it in this fashion. There are other ways if the Deputy so wishes to raise it in the House, but not in this way and not on the Order of Business.

I have a context, which is critical. Does the Tánaiste still maintain, as she has done in recent days, that he met "nobody in particular" at Druid's Glen? None of that is credible.

After the further revelations yesterday, surely——

We went over this territory yesterday for a considerable length of time and we need to move on. Does the Deputy have an inquiry about promised business or legislation?

----even her staunch adherence to and support for the Taoiseach cannot maintain. When will the Taoiseach and the Minister for Finance come to the House to make final, and full and frank statements on all that was known in the months leading up to the bank guarantee in September 2008? That has never been done and we are still in an exercise of extracting in a drip-feed way——

Does the Deputy promise us some brevity after this?

——critical, salient and important information. Will the Tánaiste ensure that the Taoiseach and the Minister for Finance will, if not today then in the coming week, come before the Dáil and make a clean breast of all that they knew——

The Deputy could do that himself.

——including the date-by-date sequence of all the information brought to their attention in the lead-up to the bank guarantee in September 2008?

The Deputy will need to pursue this matter in another way. A substantive motion is the way to do it and not on the hoof on the Order of Business in such a fashion.

The critical point is that the Government cannot continue to treat the people as fools.

Without any question——

——the complete fools in all of this——

I request that the Deputy co-operates with the Chair the odd time.

——are those who had the opportunity for formal engagement with Anglo Irish Bank and the other financial institutions and clearly had a very special opportunity in informal and social engagements with these same players——

Deputy, please.

——that they would not have known——

I ask the Deputy to give way to the next speaker.

——more than they claimed in terms of a liquidity situation as was put before the House.

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

For heaven's sake, treat the representatives of the people and the people with some respect and regard.

If the Deputy wishes to pursue this matter, a process needs to be followed.

I ask the Tánaiste to respond to my questions and——

The Deputy should table a substantive motion if he wishes to pursue the matter, but not in this fashion.

——give us a clear indication of when we will have the full truth——

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

——exposed on the floor of the Chamber.

I call Deputy Kenny with a query on legislation.

Excuse me, a Cheann Comhairle, I will have a response from the Tánaiste.

I am asking for a reply as is my entitlement.

It is inappropriate for the Deputy to raise this matter in such a fashion on the Order of Business.

This is the Order of Business.

If the Deputy so wishes to pursue it, there are a procedure and process to be followed.

We will advise the Deputy if he requires information on that matter. I ask him to resume his seat.

Let me assure you of this, a Cheann Comhairle——

The Chair is on his feet, resume your seat, please.

A Cheann Comhairle, with respect, take whatever action suits you best. You will not stand up to the Labour Party in quite the same way that your vitriol against Sinn Féin——

The Labour Party query this morning was on promised legislation, on which it is entitled to ask a question.

——clearly seems to entitle you to do. I have made one contribution and I want a response.

I have not sought to make four.

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

Will you insist on a reply, a Cheann Comhairle?

Does the Tánaiste have a brief comment?

It is out of order; there is no proposal.

There is a question regarding the Taoiseach and the Minister coming before this House——

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

——either today or in the coming week.

Resume your seat, please.

I am asking you, a Cheann Comhairle, that I get that reply.

I am asking you to resume your seat and show some respect for the Chamber and its Members. I call Deputy Kenny.

You have a duty to ensure that I get a response.

I have a duty and I fulfil that duty.

We are entitled to a response.

When will we see the wedding photographs?

The first duty is to ensure there is order in the House. I call Deputy Kenny.

With respect to Deputy Kenny, I do not want to be in conflict with any other Member seeking to speak. In terms of ordering the business, I have asked when the Taoiseach and the Minister for Finance will come before the House to give a clear, full, frank and final account of all they knew.

We have no promised business in that area. I call Deputy Kenny.

We have been misled repeatedly.

It is more than in order that I demand——

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat; I do not wish to have to ask him to leave the House, but if I have to, I will.

——that the truth and the facts are established.

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

You do no honour to your position, a Cheann Comhairle, in taking that line.

I call Deputy Kenny.

Are there any photographs?

I ask the Tánaiste to report to the House on the current position regarding the sale of EBS. Does the Government intend to have an input into a report that there are to be discussions next week at the ECOFIN meeting about the possibility of a reduction in the IMF level of interest that Ireland is paying? When is a systemic plan for the Irish banking sector expected to be produced?

I call the Tánaiste.

On the same issue, does the Government propose to set aside time for a debate on the developments in the European Union? It is clear that there is now an acceptance among many member states that the rates of interest negotiated by the Government as a sovereign regarding the IMF-EU deal are penal and that nothing in the EU treaties makes provision for a three-percentage-point facilitation fee penalty to be charged to a country like Ireland.

The Deputy will need to bring this up directly with the line Minister, which would be much more appropriate than on the Order of Business.

This is really important. As an Opposition party——

We cannot have a full-scale debate on the Order of Business of what I accept is a very important matter. It is not appropriate on the Order of Business.

The taxpayers cannot pay for this deal; does the Ceann Comhairle understand that?

The Deputy will need to find another way to raise it and have it discussed at greater length.

Yesterday——

Raising it in such a fashion on the Order of Business does not do it justice.

With respect, yesterday there was a new development. There was a very clear chink of light from the President of the Commission and from representatives of the 27 member states assembled with whom the incoming Government will negotiate a new rate. I am asking this Government while it remains in office, why it is not grasping the opportunity to reduce the cost to our citizens?

There are other ways to raise the matter, which is certainly an important matter, and I ask the Deputy to avail of them. I ask the Deputy to allow the Tánaiste to reply to Deputy Kenny's question.

I am asking for a debate time to be set aside——

Deputy, please.

——by the Government to provide a basis for renegotiating this very bad and costly deal for Irish citizens.

There are other ways of raising it in the House and please avail of them. The Tánaiste, on Deputy Kenny's query.

Could the Tánaiste say that she will provide a debate?

On the same issue——

I advised Deputy Burton that the Order of Business is not the time to raise this matter.

I know the Ceann Comhairle did.

It is an important subject. Please find another way. There are other ways.

The Ceann Comhairle's advices are generally good. On the same subject, I suggest to the Tánaiste that there are very serious matters here. We need some information from the Government on the renegotiation of the excessive interest rate that is being applied to this bailout loan from the EU institutions.

To deal with this, such a weighty subject, in such a fashion on the Order of Business is simply inappropriate.

Can the Tánaiste advise if the Minister for Finance would come in here——

Even try the Adjournment.

——and perhaps allow us to give him some advice in a negotiation strategy in terms of how to achieve this rather than a roll-over which is has been the case with the Government to date?

It is not promised legislation. The Tánaiste, on Deputy Kenny's query.

What we are dealing with are issues that were raised by the media. There were media reports of which I am aware to the effect that the EU was considering the question of reduction in interest rates charged to Ireland, but this is based on speculation. At the December Council, the Finance Ministers were asked to work on a proposal to come forward by March of this year to finalise work on the intergovernmental arrangement setting up the proposed European stability mechanism. That work is ongoing, it is confidential and it would be inappropriate to speculate on it.

It is also true to say that in the negotiations between the Government, the EU and the IMF, it is manageable to deal with the interest rates that are currently available to us. However, at the same time, we would welcome any developments which would give effect to the lowering of rates to Ireland.

It is also important to say that this matter was raised by the media at a press conference yesterday where Commissioner Rehn was asked the question about interest rates being charged to Ireland. The Commissioner pointed out that the interest rates being charged to Ireland are in line with the Council decision last year on the euro area loan facility to Greece and following intensive discussions with member states. There is nothing further that the Government wants to comment on those considerations.

They should not be widening the initiative. They should be taking the initiative.

I call Deputy Reilly.

A Cheann Comhairle,——

No, we are not going to pursue it in such a fashion.

A Cheann Comhairle,——

Deputy Burton will have to find another way. It is an important subject but there are other ways.

I have just received——

Try the Adjournment.

——a notice——

Will Deputy Burton resume her seat please?

I have just received a notice from the Department of Finance. It is pertinent to this discussion. I have just received a notice right now.

That is the point. We are not going to allow the discussion to develop.

I want to ask the Ceann Comhairle about this. It states that the Government is now proposing — this is what one of the officials has sent to me — to have the Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) Bill, which is one of the pieces of legislation listed, taken next week on 19 and 20 January. Can I ask the Tánaiste if by then she would find out who from Ireland attended yesterday's discussion and represented the Irish people, and can she come in——

That query can be raised next week when the legislation comes in.

——at the Bretton Woods Agreement (Amendment) Bill——

That query can be raised next week when we are having a debate on the Bill. We are on the Order of Business which is about queries about promised business and promised debates in the House, but we do not have promised business.

It is in the area of legislation.

I just got a notice from the Department of Finance asking me if I agree to take the Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) Bill next week on 19 and 20 January. I advise the Ceann Comhairle and the Tánaiste that the Labour Party agrees. However, we want whoever is coming in then to be ready to discuss the chink of light that has opened in the discussions in the European Union on renegotiating this deal.

Deputy Burton will be able to raise those points next week. I am sure she will be leading for her party on the debate on the legislation.

No, sorry, I want to know from the Tánaiste——

Deputy, please.

——does she accept the Labour Party's agreement to take the Bretton Woods Agreements (Amendment) Bill.

We have a Whip system in the House. Deputy Burton's party has a very experienced Whip and I am sure he can raise the matter with the Government Whip.

The Department of Finance contacted me. Perhaps it is contacting the Whip as well, which is fine, but it contacted me.

Deputy Burton, just resume your seat. I call Deputy Reilly.

Does the Government Whip know about it?

Deputy Burton is spreading disorder in the House.

Can I ask the Tánaiste what is the Government's position? The Whip is meeting now. He must be checking this.

Will Deputy Burton resume her seat? I call Deputy Reilly.

The Whip has gone out to check his e-mail.

A Cheann Comhairle,——

I appreciate the enthusiasm of Deputy Burton——

I thank the Tánaiste.

——but I must say she is losing the run of herself.

She indicated that she agrees to the discussion of this legislation on Wednesday next, and I thank her for it. The Whips will decide what time it will be taken.

Here is the Whip now.

That is the normal way business has gone on in this House since the foundation of the State.

On an entirely different matter, each time at Order of Business Members raise issues——

Will the Minister of State, Deputy Curran, check that?

——and try to investigate or get some information, we are advised by the Ceann Comhairle that there is another route, which is to table a parliamentary question. Often these parliamentary questions are not answered by the Minister but sent off down the line, and in my case usually to the HSE. However, today we reach a new low in the democracy and the running of this Parliament which really makes one wonder if we are in the dying days of a banana republic.

I submitted a question to the Minister for Health and Children for discussion and answer this afternoon and the General Office edited it. I have no problem with editing in consultation. However, the first line of my question relates to people waiting on trolleys in accident and emergency departments which reached an unprecedented high of 569 in January 2011. In their wisdom, they have removed those figures, which changes the nature of the question and denies the right to put that on the public record.

That is utterly unacceptable. I ask that the Ceann Comhairle insist and instruct——

Deputy Reilly——

Sorry, a Cheann Comhairle, let me finish.

——I am sure you will be revisiting this matter at Question Time.

The Ceann Comhairle can instruct the General Office that there can be no editing without consultation with those who submit the question. This is utterly undemocratic and totally unacceptable and is further evidence of the Government clawing onto power——

I am sure we will have it at Question Time.

——using every ruse possible to deprive the people of information. It amounts to censorship.

I note with interest that two important Bills are listed for discussion over the next week or so, which are the Welfare of Greyhounds Bill 2010 and the Climate Change Response Bill 2010. Can the Tánaiste explain why neither the legal costs Bill, which would save this country money, nor the health (information) Bill, which might provide us some truth about the health service, has been included in the urgent business, yet the Climate Change Response Bill, which will cost this country a fortune, is included?

There are differing views in the House now about whether legislation should be taken. We have given an indicative programme of legislation that we hope to take in the Dáil and, unfortunately, those pieces of legislation are not included.

The Minister of State, Deputy White, promised legislation on gender equality. I ask the Tánaiste, in view of the events of the past number of days, whether it will be compulsory for women to take up golf.

Just the nineteenth hole.

And possibly apportion due incantations as well. One could have to add that into it as well to understand what happened.

On promised legislation and the point raised by Deputy Reilly, an ongoing and increasing practice, as the Ceann Comhairle well knows, is changing the context of Members' questions. It is totally out of order and has never been known to happen until the past year or year and a half, where Members' questions are corrected to give a different meaning to the question altogether. It is totally out of order.

We cannot have this type of debate on the Order of Business.

We cannot have that kind of carry-on either.

There are other fora for the purpose.

The Ceann Comhairle will be glad to know I am not going to ask about what went on at Druid's Glen. I am somewhat confused about what went on, as are the Tánaiste and other members of the Government. What I am concerned about is what the Taoiseach told me in this House. I note in the list of promised legislation for this session the urgently required Local Government (Mayor and Regional Authority of Dublin) Bill 2010. I do not know that it is urgent or needed at this time. I note the Welfare of Greyhounds Bill 2010 is there as well. The Taoiseach indicated to me before Christmas that the national vetting bureau Bill was an urgently required piece of legislation and I am surprised it has not found its way onto the Order Paper. There are less demanding and compelling pieces of legislation on it. Will the Tánaiste intercede with the Taoiseach with a view to dropping one of the less-needed pieces of legislation now proposed, such as the Dublin lord mayor Bill or some other Bills?

The Deputy should speak to his party Whip about the matter.

This has nothing to do with party Whips but rather a promise made by the Taoiseach to me in this House before Christmas. Where do you get the notion that I should consult with the Whips?

This concerns changes in the sequence——

It does not; it concerns the Order of Business agreed and published by the Government Chief Whip. It has nothing to do with anything else. I would like a reply from the Tánaiste.

The mayoral Bill is on Report Stage and will be taken in due course. The work is ongoing on the vetting legislation and I am not sure if it will be completed in time for consideration by the House.

The Government could drop one of the other Bills.

It is not ready, which is the problem.

Why is it not ready?

Before we proceed, I did not get an answer from the Ceann Comhairle, to whom the questions office is answerable. What undertaking will be given to the House that he will rectify the matter, if any?

We need notice of the matter.

You have notice now and I am offering you an opportunity to reassure the House that you will act on it and underscore democracy, not undermine it.

I am not in a position at this point. If we had notice of the query earlier, I could have responded, but I am not in a position to do so now.

Will you do so later?

Will the Ceann Comhairle respond later?

We will check it out.

Will you respond today?

It is a strangulation of democracy.

The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government has commissioned a report about the Poolbeg incinerator and has had it for a number of months. When will it be published so that we can discuss it?

It is a good question.

I will ask the Minister about it.

Is the Tánaiste still speaking to him?

The Tánaiste will remember that I asked her in the last session a number of times about the publication of the female genital mutilation Bill. She indicated on a number of occasions that it would be published in the last session but it has still not been published. There is a major concern in the new communities in Ireland as female genital mutilation is being practised here. I understood it was a Government priority for the Bill to be published and rapidly enacted. Where is the legislation?

I am aware of the Deputy's interest in this and he is quite right in that it is an important issue. This matter was discussed by the Cabinet, if I remember correctly, just before Christmas. One or two minor issues are to be completed but it is our intention to publish the legislation.

There are two matters I want to ask about. The first is the NAMA amendment Bill, which is to be prioritised by the Government. This important Bill would allow for debts of developer loans under €20 million to be transferred to NAMA. Given that billions of euro of taxpayers' money is involved in this Bill, is it the intention of the Government to publish any kind of White Paper or Green Paper, or even an early copy of this Bill, in order for the Opposition to examine it from a legal perspective?

In the context of this new NAMA Bill, which is for loans under €20 million, before Christmas I asked several questions of the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills about subcontractors. This was in the context of the collapse of Pierse Construction, which was to build schools under public private partnerships for her Department. I am sure the Minister and every Deputy in the House is aware of different firms, individuals and families who were subcontractors and have been left in a terrible state of financial ruin. Is it proposed in the NAMA amendment Bill to deal with that issue? It is really important that we get advance information on the Bill's content so that we can assess and consider it. Its implications will run into billions of euro for taxpayers.

The second issue concerns the Climate Change Response Bill, which I understand is under consideration in the Seanad. This Bill is very important for agriculture, industry and small and medium businesses, as well as individual consumers. Normally, a Bill like this, which is so important for agriculture and industry, would involve——

We cannot debate this in such a fashion on the Order of Business.

I will be very brief.

A brief inquiry about promised legislation is fine.

That would give rise to a consultation period with agriculture, industry and consumer interests at the very least.

The Deputy has made her point.

Does Fianna Fáil propose to provide for a consultation period?

We cannot have a debate like this on the Bill on the Order of Business.

In the UK there was an 18-month consultation with agriculture.

The Deputy should allow the Tánaiste to respond to her inquiry about the two pieces of legislation.

The heads of the NAMA legislation were agreed by the Cabinet at our last meeting and the legislation is being drafted. I will advise the Minister that the Deputy is anxious to get a briefing on the matter as quickly as possible. On the Pierce Construction issue, the buildings are going ahead because of a joint venture with Sisk. Senator Quinn's legislation in the Upper House has been accepted by the Government for consideration in this House. The climate change Bill has commenced consideration in the Seanad and the consultation period began in December.

Top
Share