Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 7 Oct 2015

Vol. 892 No. 1

Building on Recovery: Statements

I am glad to have the opportunity to outline to the House the capital investment framework, Building on Recovery, which represents an Exchequer spend of €27 billion over the next six years. The longer six-year timeframe for the plan will facilitate the delivery of a greater number of projects and programmes. Key investments will be made in transport, education, health and enterprise, including a new metro link between the city centre and Dublin Airport and Swords, a number of new road projects, a renewed and increased commitment to flood risk management, the relocation of both Dublin maternity hospitals as well as Limerick Regional Maternity Hospital, construction of the national children's hospital, installation of wireless networks in all schools, the removal of remaining prefabs at schools and investment in the enterprise regional building programme. In every part of the country, these investments will boost our competitiveness, create jobs and upgrade our social infrastructure. If we add investment from the wider semi-state sector and off-balance-sheet mechanisms such as public private partnerships, total State investment will amount to €42 billion in new and existing infrastructure over the period, which is an average of 3.5% of GNP per annum.

The House will recall that the capital plan announced in 2011 contained necessary reductions in expenditure which reflected the fiscal position we were then in. As recent Exchequer figures have shown, those difficult but necessary decisions are beginning to pay off. Of the €42 billion worth of investment set out in the new programme, €27 billion will be invested through direct Exchequer spending. This represents a significant increase of some €10 billion over the previous five-year plan. Decisions to allocate Exchequer funding were made following a lengthy review process, which included input from stakeholders at the national economic dialogue which we began this year. The dialogue process was a most worthy discussion over two days. The analysis identified capacity constraints, infrastructural bottlenecks and areas where demand pressures were building. It informed the investment decisions contained in this framework to direct funding where it is most needed while maximising the economic and social return to the taxpayer. The investment framework marks the beginning of a return to normal levels of investment.

In order to sustain growth, we must invest, but we must also do so in the right way. We will make affordable, sustainable investments that boost the productive capacity of the economy, improve public services and lay the foundations for future growth. It is intended to have a mid-term review of the plan, which will allow for a refreshing of the priorities and allocations, if appropriate, within the updated fiscal context at the time. The plan is not a departure from the prudent management of the public finances that has been the hallmark of this Government. Rather, it is an affirmation of that approach. The fiscal rules enshrined in both national and European law ensure that increases in expenditure reflect the underlying strength of our economy.  Building on Recovery is entirely consistent with this approach.

There is no doubt that the economy is now in a sustained recovery. All the data so far this year have been encouraging. Consumer spending has been strong in 2015, with retail sales up by almost 10% year on year in July. Car sales were up by almost 7% over the same period. Investment is also growing, with both building construction and machinery and equipment spending on a rising path. Recovery in the construction sector continued in July, with the purchasing managers' index for the sector recording its 23rd successive month of growth. In fact, with the inclusion of the August figure, there have been 24 consecutive months of growth. These encouraging macroeconomic data are mirrored in total taxation receipts, which are up 9.8% to August, year on year. The Department of Finance published its macroeconomic forecasts in April, in which GDP was expected to expand by 4% in 2015 and 3.8% in 2016. As can be seen from recent independent forecasts, the Department's forecasts may be a little behind the curve right now, and I expect they will be updated in the Budget Statement next Tuesday.

Investment decisions must take account of future needs as well as meeting current demands.  Demand for extra funding and investment is high, but decisions about how and where we spend our resources are not taken lightly. I have introduced a requirement that all capital programmes and projects with a value greater than €100 million will require Government approval prior to commencement. Further, and in line with long-standing practice, all projects and programmes to be delivered under this Exchequer capital investment framework are subject to the provisions of the public spending code, including the provisions in relation to the need for appraisal and value for money. Projects are also subject, of course, to planning guidelines and requirements, including environmental impacts assessments as appropriate.

The new capital programme supports the Government's number one priority, which is getting people back to work. An estimated 45,000 construction jobs will be directly supported as a result of the Exchequer plan. The Government has also committed to spending €3 billion to support business and innovation through our enterprise agencies over the duration of the plan. The IDA, Enterprise Ireland and Science Foundation Ireland support 320,000 jobs in this country. We will continue to support these agencies by providing funding for grants, equity investments and innovation supports.

In order to grow, businesses need fast, efficient transport networks. In the decade up to 2008, Ireland addressed many of the infrastructural deficits that had been constraining growth. I acknowledge that large-scale investments were made in our road network, public transport links and airports. As Europe's fastest-growing and most dynamic economy today, it is essential that we preserve our competitiveness by building on those investments. In recognition of the fact that large transport projects have long lead-in times, the Government will provide a seven-year capital envelope to the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport. A total of €10 billion will be available to the Department over the period. By 2022, we will have doubled the level of annual investment in the transport area to €2 billion per annum. The largest single project will be a new metro and light rail link in Dublin. Based on the outcome of the recent Fingal and north Dublin transport study, the National Transport Authority has recommended that a revised metro project be selected as the appropriate public transport project to address the transport needs of the Swords and Dublin Airport to city centre corridor. The plan is to have a metro link in operation by 2026 to 2027 along a route for which travel demand is forecast to grow by almost 40% by 2033 and where the current and potential future levels of car dependency are unsustainable.

The proportion of our citizens aged over 65 is, thankfully, increasing, which poses challenges to our health care system. To meet these challenges, there will be a large-scale investment in health care facilities for the duration of the plan. By 2021, €600 million will be spent annually to upgrade our hospitals, residential homes and health infrastructure.

This level of funding restores capital expenditure in health to its previous peak.

The capital framework provides funding for the relocation of the Dublin maternity hospitals, which we announced, and Limerick maternity hospital. Under the plan, an additional €300 million will be invested in upgrading residential facilities around the country to meet Health Information and Quality Authority, HIQA, standards. These facilities will not only provide an excellent standard of care and recovery, but also ease the pressure on hospitals and improve efficiencies across the system.

Our young and growing population will allow us to sustain our recovery over the next decade and beyond, but we must ensure that public infrastructure is in place to support young families. Nowhere is this more evident than in education. Between 2012 and 2014, which were the most difficult of times, the Government built more than 84 new schools and 55 large-scale school extensions. The capital investment framework continues that commitment. We will spend more than €3 billion in the next six years investing in our children's future by building new schools and upgrading existing ones. These new and upgraded buildings will be fit for the 21st century. The capital plan provides €400 million for the installation of wireless networks in all schools, investment in IT hardware and a programme to replace the remaining prefabs in schools. Many of the record number of pupils due to complete school in the coming years will inevitably attend college. We must plan and invest for this as well. A total of €350 million will be invested in third level infrastructure, including a new €200 million public-private partnership, PPP, investment in the institutes of technology sector.

As the House will know, An Garda Síochána is embarked on a programme of substantial reform. A critical priority for the Government is to support this process of reform through increased expenditure on Garda information technology. We want to remove any impediment to the development of a modern, state-of-the-art police force. To support that goal in the six years to come, we will invest more than €330 million in Garda ICT systems and technologies and €46 million on new and upgraded Garda vehicles.

The Government is committed to ensuring that our economic infrastructure is available in all regions. Investment in ICT is critical to our national economy. Recently, the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources agreed the national broadband strategy. The plan will utilise significant private sector investment and be supported by investment from the Exchequer. It will ensure that every business and household has access to high-speed broadband to help connect communities, spread growth and support local business.

Given the pressing need to recommence a house building programme to meet urgent housing needs, additional allocations to support social housing were announced as part of last year's budget. Through direct Exchequer spending and local government investment, approximately €3 billion will be provided for the social housing strategy. The Government remains committed to using every available source of funding to address the shortage of social and affordable housing.

The Government is also aware that we have obligations to behave responsibly not only in respect of fiscal sustainability, which we have proven, but also in terms of environmental sustainability. We need to protect and maintain our environment and habitats not just for today, but for future generations. We cannot ignore the impact of climate change and, as a country, we have a responsibility to play our part in reducing reliance on fossil fuels. We also have legally binding renewable energy targets and €444 million will be spent on energy efficiency and renewable energy programmes during the period of the capital plan. However, the effects of climate change are already visible in towns and villages across Ireland. To protect vulnerable communities, the Government has prioritised the introduction of a new flood risk management programme. By 2021, spending on this programme will have reached €100 million per annum.

As we approach the centenary of the 1916 Rising, it is appropriate that we complete all planned works on our important heritage sites and provide additional funding for commemoration projects. Under the capital framework, an additional €31 million will be provided next year for these works.

A new PPP programme valued at €500 million will be developed in the justice, education and health sectors. This programme will build on recent successes, utilise the significant level of expertise that we have developed in this area and leverage Ireland's positive position among national and international investors. To coincide with this PPP programme, the Government will introduce a PPP investment policy framework. The framework will limit expenditure on PPPs to a stated percentage of annual capital spending and provide transparency and clarity to ensure that the long-term interests of the taxpayer are protected.

The Government will provide a responsible, affordable and sustainable way forward. By working together, State and industry will deliver modern, strategic infrastructure that will build on the economic recovery and allow it to continue. I thank the House for its attention.

I apologise for being late for the Minister's remarks. He was positively purring when he delivered some of the macroeconomic statistics. I do not know whether it was a dress rehearsal for next Tuesday.

There are a number of issues with the plan. It should be viewed in the context of a lack of deliverable dates for many of its projects. This points to a failure to reform the delivery of large-scale projects. I do not mean this in a party political way, but our public service operates in a silo fashion, with one Department deciding one project while another Department is in charge of the regulations for delivering and planning that project, leading to projects not proceeding. It could be 11 years before a ticket is sold on the metro north. If we want to be a modern European economy with a capital city that strives to be one of the best not just in Europe, but in the world, surely we must be able to deliver such a transport system in less than 11 years.

The plan was announced with a great deal of fanfare and publicity, but alongside the announcement we lost the Web Summit. This was a statement on Dublin's lack of capacity to deliver on large events. Those behind the Web Summit want to move it around and it is a private company, but we must examine the concerns that were highlighted last year about, for example, Wi-Fi and hotel accommodation, which factor into this plan and its ambitions.

In 2008, before the onset of the crisis, €9 billion per year was invested in capital projects. While the Minister has acknowledged this, capital expenditure will only have reached approximately half of that level by 2019. Amid the fanfare and the spin, there are many gaps. I do not know whether we have weeks or months left in this House. Does even the Minister know? Regardless, proper respect for democracy and debate could be shown by having every line committee examine the plan and, within its priorities-----

It is open to them to do that.

----analyse whether and when X, Y or Z will be delivered. The civil servants who are in charge of prioritising and not prioritising projects within the plan should appear before each committee to justify that selection. I do not know whether we can do that in the course of this Dáil. Perhaps we cannot, in which case it should be the first item on the agenda for the next bunch of committees. If there is to be a mid-term review of the plan's projects, we need to review the manner in which we deliver the plan.

Last week, I noticed that Apple's welcome decision to locate in Athenry had become subject to a planning appeal. That is normal and is people's right, but it will take An Bord Pleanála at least six months to decide on the matter. The board's track record on smaller projects has seen the process extend to nine or 12 months. We will delay a project that was hard fought for by the good people in IDA Ireland, was located in the regions to everyone's surprise and was badly needed. It will go into the quagmire of our planning system. Have we not learned lessons from previous plans? Surely there should be an overall infrastructural body to take charge of and deliver these plans. Instead of delay upon delay, we would then get a plan that had dates and delivery targets for specific projects.

This plan contains many projects that were not delivered in the Government's previous plan for various reasons - for example, budgets, or, more importantly, a lack of progress. Were the Minister a finalist in tonight's "The Great British Bake Off," he would be criticised for reheating what was previously baked and lose marks. There are an awful lot of soggy bottoms in this plan. Many of them are due to problems with the Government and its lack of ambition, but others are due to system problems that, if not acted upon, will plague this plan and haunt its delivery in the same way they did with other plans.

The plan's employment statistics are ambitious. Everyone wants people to work, and I note the plan seeks to create 45,000 construction jobs. That is fantastic, but does the apprenticeship system have the capacity to back that up? Were the Minister to allocate money to SOLAS next week to put in place an apprenticeship programme, how would it be able to get up to that capacity quickly to avoid a situation similar to that which pertained in 2001 and 2002, when the construction rates and the tender amount one was obliged to pay to get construction done ate into the value of the projects? Unless the capacity is available to deliver an apprenticeship programme that is real and relevant to 2015, as opposed to the early 1980s, this plan will not deliver, and it certainly will not deliver 45,000 construction jobs. There is a cadre of people who have skills that need updating, and they should be targeted through employment programmes. They should be given access to these jobs, and the people who wish to learn those skills from school or otherwise should now be given a chance. If this involves the Minister front-loading investment in SOLAS and the institutes of technology to make those programmes available and to produce those skilled people, that should be done, because the labour force then will be available to deliver the plan.

I will go through some of the projects. At present, 42% of Ireland's GDP is generated around the environs of this building, in places like Dublin 2 and Dublin 6, and not even in all of Dublin. When one leaves Dublin's city centre, one encounters serious economic black spots that are not witnessing a recovery, and when one leaves Dublin altogether one encounters serious problems. One measure of this plan will be its ability to restore that balance and its ability to give the regions a proper say and a proper role in the country's recovery, as well as a proper chance to exploit its opportunities. However, the plan as laid out does not do this. A plan that leaves out a link road between two key cities, Cork and Limerick, does not say anything about regional development. A plan that cuts the budget for the regional broadband scheme that was announced only a few weeks previously does not do much for a regional broadband economy. As for the road network plan, ironically, my constituency colleague, the Taoiseach, as well as our senior constituency colleague, the Minister of State, Deputy Ring, are running to claim credit for the N5, yet the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Paschal Donohoe, has stated that he has no direct involvement in the choosing of the roads. Perhaps the Government needs to get its story right. However, when one considers that €4.4 billion of €6 billion over the next few years has been allocated to maintenance-----

Is that not a good thing?

-----it leaves little scope for new regional maintenance and regional development projects. If there is to be a proper regional plan that seeks not to cut Dublin or to make it suffer but to restore and build a balance, one would ask why projects such as the Cork-Limerick route have not been given the go-ahead. This is why senior civil servants must appear before committees - to answer for this and to make the Dáil relevant once again.

On public transport, as I stated, the metro north has an 11-year timeframe, and all Members present might have left the Oireachtas by then.

We might all be gone within 11 weeks.

I will quote the Minister on that. However, the fact it has taken so long to deliver serious public transport plans such as the metro north undermines the plan. While we claim Dublin to be a European and world city, the fact that one still arrives into Dublin Airport and does not have direct rail access into Dublin city undermines our capacity as a country to sell ourselves.

As for flood defences, the Minister mentioned all the work that has been done on the flood management plans and so on, but again, it is evident how slow this process is. Serious flood issues arose in Cork in 2010 that are the subject of court cases at present, but there has not yet been much investment in flood management in Cork. While some good work has been done in rural areas, there is much more to do, and the planning is taking a long time. I am aware of this from experience in my native county, where a flood issue arose in Crossmolina in 2007 that only now is being resolved in 2015, which I welcome as part of this plan. In my home town of Ballina, a serious flood issue has not been included in this plan because the Office of Public Works has not got around to drawing up its local flood management plans as yet.

On the mid-term review, I stated earlier that the Minister was purring about the fiscal position. However, the Minister must focus his Department on the public service reform side of things and on the system's ability to deliver on a plan such as this. Unless the system of delivery has changed and unless the Minister has reformed the system of delivery, we will get what we have, namely, an à la carte plan with no delivery dates to which Members can hold a Government agency or Department to account, with vague budget figures beside it and with little precision in the budgets pertaining to many projects. This is why, as a Parliament - as an Oireachtas - Members cannot make a proper account of it or hold it to review. Members cannot make a proper judgment on it given the flimsiness of the document presented to them.

I note that a date still has not been provided for delivery of the national children's hospital. It has dogged the present Government, as it did previous Governments-----

It was the site chosen that was wrong.

-----and one could ask why we are not in position to make progress on that project or why it could not have been delivered. The Minister mentioned 2016, and there will be a lot of pomp and ceremony next year, but in respect of a real monument to the men and women of 1916, a dedicated children's hospital would have been far better than a march down O'Connell Street.

The Deputy's party picked the wrong site for it.

Again, however, the issues that dogged the delivery of the children's hospital will dog much of this plan.

It was the site.

It was not simply the site. There were planning issues and many other problems, because there has been no reform. There have been no major changes to the system that delivers, and that is what must happen. IBEC, which is a fan of the Minister's senior party in government, has stated that 90% or 95% of capital expenditure is on maintenance. The tradition will continue within this plan. As for the ambition the Minister claims is contained within this plan, when one goes through the not-very-small print, because the detail therein is so lacking, one finds it is not present. This is not a plan to lead this country into a recovery out of an economic downturn. It is not a plan that shows there is a vision for the country. It is vague and not even aspirational, and if the Minister has the courage of his speech, he will allow the plan to be put before the committees before or after the election and will allow a proper analysis of it, rather than the two-hour set of statements in the Chamber - it is not even a debate - taking place this evening.

The next speaking slot will be shared by Deputies McDonald, McLellan and Ellis.

Just as the first cuckoo heralds the spring, one knows there is an election in the air because from near and far across every constituency, one hears the rustling of wads of taxpayers' cash. It is that time when the Minister blows the dust from his wallet, the rust is scraped from the locks of the Government's treasure chests and the Minister's largesse flows freely, or so he would have Members believe. In 2008, capital expenditure reached its peak at €9 billion, and by the time the Minister came into government in 2011, capital expenditure was at €4.5 billion. Over the term of the present Government it fell steadily, reaching €3.3 billion in 2014. The Government's plan, which pledges €27 billion over six years, envisages an increase from €3.8 billion in 2016 to €5.4 billion in 2021, which leaves one with an average of €4.5 billion per annum. The Government is getting back to the level of expenditure it inherited when it took office, and consequently, in real terms, the Minister is doing no more than restoring-----

A broken economy.

-----a budget that he was a party to cutting during his years in office. One could argue, were one to take into account inflation, changes in population and demographic pressures, that in real terms the figure is less than the level of expenditure the Minister inherited. In any event, it still will leave us second from the bottom of the league in European terms in respect of capital investment. Most people would regard this plan as part of the choreography of general elections. Famously, under the previous Government, the former Taoiseach, Brian Cowen, flanked by John Gormley of the Green Party, announced a massive spending plan to the tune of €40 billion. Does the Minister remember that? Of course it never happened; it was notional and aspirational, much as is this document. The long and the short of it is that it was not delivered.

Consideration of a document like this is probably more suited to a committee setting where we can examine each proposition step by step. We should avail of the opportunity to do that.

As my time is limited, I want to zero in on one proposition the Minister has made. It is on page 31 under the heading of health care. In it, he sets out a reconfiguration of the investment in maternity services, which is long overdue. He plans to move the Rotunda Hospital out to Connolly Hospital in Blanchardstown. I would like the Minister to provide the cost-benefit analysis and position papers that informed that particular decision. I wonder if such documentation exists. Anybody who knows this particular hospital, which has been crying out for investment for a long time, would know that its medical referral relationship has always been with the Mater hospital. Those of us who know the area - I suspect the Minister himself also knows it - are aware that there is a site adjacent to the Mater hospital which had been earmarked for the children's hospital. The Minister will remember that and he will also know that considerable amounts of taxpayers' moneys were invested - some may argue wasted - in the preparation of that site.

People who have attended or worked in the Rotunda Hospital cannot understand this decision to move it to Blanchardstown. Why on earth would one do that and disrupt those medical relationships, while leaving that site idle? For the purposes of this specific initiative, I would like to see all of the considerations and analyses, including a cost-benefit analysis, that informed a decision to move this maternity hospital to Blanchardstown, which is the constituency both of the Minister for Health, Deputy Leo Varadkar, and the Tánaiste, Deputy Joan Burton.

I have raised that specific issue, but each of the other initiatives contained in the report need to be subjected to that kind of analysis in terms of expenditure, the efficacy of the spend, and the process the Minister went through to produce this document. Surely the politics of a general election do not inform the Minister, and he would not be playing for home advantage as well.

Having briefly had the opportunity to read through the infrastructure and capital investment plan, I have noticed what I believe to be a few gaping holes in it. There would appear to be a lack of investment in child care, given the public outcry for better facilities and access in this regard. The sum of €11 million a year in early years and youth projects is a pittance when looked at from an outside perspective and demonstrates a lack of will to invest in the youth of today, especially considering that a large percentage of that allocation is to be put towards the child detention facility in Oberstown.

From meeting a number of my constituents in east Cork, along with a number of stakeholders, we are all in agreement that early intervention is the way forward. A proactive approach is needed, rather than the reactive one which this Government seems to support.

Substantial investment is needed in the youth work sector. The work that these people carry out is invaluable and they need to be supported in their endeavours. Most of these workers get by with limited resources on a daily basis and still produce results when their hands are effectively tied. They work out of shoddy offices or no offices at all, working directly with the most marginalised and vulnerable young people in the country. With the funding the Minister has outlined to be allocated, how does he propose that these services are ever to become more effective in what is an already hugely strained sector?

I welcome the Minister's investment in Tusla, although I believe it falls somewhat short of what is required. Massive resources need to be freed up in order to allow social workers to do the already taxing and difficult work they carry out. The children to social workers ratio is well above recommended levels. In practical terms, this allows social workers to meet with their assigned cases on an infrequent basis and can adversely lead to a breakdown of what was a workable relationship. The reality of what is needed seems to be alien and although these issues are acknowledged in this House time and time again, nothing much ever seems to change. A detachment from reality appears to be consistent across the board and is an all too recurring theme. Access visits between families tend to be conducted in these overworked office spaces, so money should be allocated to provide facilities that are welcoming and which allow these families to meet in a safe and comfortable environment, rather than in a dull and dreary office.

I hope that within the Minister's allocated finances, from whatever little will be left, moneys will be ring-fenced to support family resource centres. These centres also do great work in marginalised and disadvantaged areas, but they are struggling at both national and local level. They are grossly understaffed and unable to accommodate and support families that find themselves in situations of consistent poverty. Unfortunately, these numbers are still rising due to the policies prioritised by the Government. There is a significant need for investment in these areas to allow staff to have space to provide for these young people and families.

The €136 million being invested in our country's children is merely a token gesture over the course of the five years. It is quite simply a drop in the ocean when analysed and broken down. If the Government is truly serious about child care infrastructure and the aspirations towards a Scandinavian model, why allocate so little? Instead of cutting tax, adequate capital investment should be made available if we are to move forward and fix this in a way that is both sustainable and of benefit to working parents, or those who are hampered in returning to work due to astronomical costs.

Refugees are set to enter our country before Christmas. Minimal amounts appear to be allocated to address this matter, including services, their accommodation and other infrastructure. I have major concerns surrounding these areas also and especially the treatment of children who will be entering the country. These children are coming from war-torn countries, often having travelled for weeks on end, all of which could only leave these children with a mass of traumatic experiences. How are we going to cope with these children who need help to overcome their traumatic experiences when we are currently so under-resourced in this sector? More needs to be done in this regard and I call on the Government to revisit seriously and analyse a document that seems to have been compiled with disregard to the reality of ground-level services and amenities.

The capital investment plan introduced by the Government over a week ago, amid much inflated hype, earmarks €27 billion toward a number of areas, including transport and housing, over a six-year period. The plan is plush with style and grand statements, but when we search for the substance and detail there is little to be found.

As we draw ever closer to the end of 2015, the spectre of an election looms large, and I have little doubt as to the extent of its influence. For all the contrived statements and press calls, the Government must remember that these issues affect every person in this country. The people are not just an electorate to be courted, but citizens to whom these plans must be delivered.

Housing is grossly under addressed in the Minister's document. It takes up just over one page, the majority of which repeats details of another document, the Social Housing Strategy 2020. According to the capital plan, and I quote directly from the text, "The Government believes that everyone should have access to good quality housing suited to their needs at an affordable price and in a sustainable community". Why then has this Government failed comprehensively to tackle the housing emergency in a decisive manner? Through the capital plan the Government aims to put €3 billion towards the Social Housing Strategy 2020, under which the Minister claims he will deliver up to 35,000 units, with an implication that he might not deliver on the full 35,000. It is clear that most of that 35,000 will be delivered from the private sector and will be directed towards the RAS, rent supplement and HAP schemes.

At current estimates, we need over 20,000 houses a year to meet demand. I remind the Government that between 2008 and 2014, State spending on housing fell by €1.6 billion. It started with the previous government and finished with the current one. In 2013, approximately 750 units were built by local authorities and AHBs, with a further 1,200 delivered through leasing arrangements. We are in a crisis and this situation has reached a fundamentally critical stage for far too many people across the country. The Government spinning a skeletal plan in the context of an election does nothing to improve the situation.

Regarding transport, we broadly welcome the much-needed investment in the road network, including the €4.4 billion earmarked for road maintenance and upgrades.

However, we have concerns about the lack of costings in the capital plan. A total of €1.6 billion is to be spent on new road projects. The Minister listed a broad range throughout the country, almost one for every area.

The metro north rail project is essential for a European capital city like Dublin. In principle, we welcome plans to proceed with its development. Plans for a metro in Dublin go all the way back to 2001, when the report entitled A Platform for Change, produced by the Dublin Transportation Office, proposed two metro lines, metro north and metro west. In 2006 the Railway Procurement Agency drew up plans for three potential routes. However, it was March 2007 before RPA started the procurement process, and it was not until 2009 that potential bidders were short-listed. The consideration of other potential projects such as metro north and the DART underground, as well as issues in finalising the route selection, resulted in the deferral of any metro plan for Dublin. Today, 14 years after the idea was originally proposed, the Government has earmarked funding, and construction of the metro north will start in 2021. The project is due for completion in 2026 or 2027. Given the 15-year wait for any real progress, it is difficult to envisage the Government delivering a metro even within this elongated timeline, particularly if the consultation process is to be revisited. I wish to remind the House that €170 million has been spent on the metro north already.

It is also disappointing that the A5 has been all but written off in the Government plans. So much for cross-Border projects and co-operation.

Our success in public private partnerships is not impressive, and this calls into question the €300 million announced by the Government in housing. We have seen many projects collapse over the years, and PPPs have always been a major problem.

Throughout the tenure of this Government, investment in housing and transport has suffered. Between 2012 and 2014, the capital budget for transport amounted to €3.4 billion. I have no doubt those in the Government will congratulate themselves on forward planning, but delivery is the essential component. Otherwise, this plan can be considered little more than electioneering.

The next speaking slot will be shared by Deputies Paul Murphy, Michael Fitzmaurice and Richard Boyd Barrett.

When I first read the capital plan it reminded me of the film "This is Spinal Tap" in which they talk about turning the volume up to 11. This time the Government has announced a capital plan that is six years long instead of the normal five years. This allowed the Government to announce €27 billion instead of something less than €22 billion.

If the purpose of the plan is pre-election propaganda, it may or may not be successful. If the purpose of the plan is to deal with the historically low levels of public and private investment in the economy, then the plan is utterly inadequate. Let us start with the headline figures. Twenty-seven billion euro sounds like a great deal of money, until we compare it to historical long-term average figures for public investment. The historical long-term average figure for public investment in the State is 3.5% of GDP. In 2015 the figure stands at 1.8% of GDP, and with this new magic plan it will be 1.9% of GDP. In money terms, this means the plan represents an increase in public spending next year of €200 million and, in the following years of the plan, increases of €250 million. This is in the context of the Government's plan to cut taxes in the next budget to the tune of €750 million, tax cuts that will skew towards higher earners. The context is private sector investment remaining down by 35% compared to pre-crisis levels and public sector investment having been absolutely slashed. Those are the headline figures

When we examine it in more detail, the situation is even worse. Let us consider the phasing of the money. The money is back-loaded - that is to say, more money is spent later on down the road, when the Government may or may not be in power, rather than now. We simply do not know if the Government will be in power next year, never mind six years from now, by which time these big promises of public spending and investment may have been forgotten. In 2016 we will start with €3.8 billion, and this will rise in 2021 to €5.4 billion. This is utterly cynical and makes no economic sense at a time when interest rates are at an all-time low and the State could borrow at this stage to invest. It would be better to invest now in improving our infrastructure and to front-load that investment. The only reason to do it the other way around is cynical electioneering.

Let us consider the plan in more detail. There is no new money for housing, despite the emergency - only €3 billion or €500 million per year. Let us consider the categories of investment. More investment is going to areas that are connected to corporate welfare for some big businesses, rather than going into health, education, climate change and housing. The total going on enterprise or corporate welfare is €4.3 billion. Let us consider how money will be spent within the spending categories. Out of the €10 billion being spent on transport, including public private partnerships, more than €6 billion is going on roads and less than €4 billion on public transport. Let us compare that to €874 million on climate change, €430 million of which is going towards adapting to climate change by building flood defences rather than actually trying to stop it. The Government is also planning to invest as much in defence as on climate change.

Let us consider the role of public private partnerships. Some €500 million will be spent on new PPP funding, stood over by the Labour Party, in what is a scheme that costs the public more money. It is a more expensive way to deliver infrastructure and is basically about the public sector subsidising private profit. This is not what we need. In fact, it is the opposite of what we need. We need major public investment to deal with all the social problems that exist in our society and create the basis for a sustainable recovery. A key basis for a sustainable recovery will be increased levels of investment in our society. The collapse in investment - between 66% and 70% of private sector investment - was a key driving factor in the dragging down of the economy over an extended period. It is also the only way we will deal with the social problems that exist. For example, the Anti-Austerity Alliance will launch its budget statement in the coming days. The centrepiece of the document is the idea of major public investment to deal with the housing crisis. We estimate that for €10 billion of additional public investment, spread over three years - that is, a little less than €3.5 billion per year - we could build 100,000 homes and effectively clear the housing waiting list, together with the use of vacant properties and the resources of NAMA. In addition, we believe there is a need for further public investment based on creating decent jobs. One estimate suggests that an investment stimulus of €1 billion for one year would create approximately 16,750 jobs. That would represent a net cost of €575 million owing to greater tax revenues as a result of higher GDP. For example, for €2.3 billion we could have 15,000 workers in a major public works programme to replace non-compliant water mains throughout the State, or 10,000 child care workers in publicly owned crèches, or 5,000 special needs assistants, or 10,000 workers to develop Ireland's wind and wave energy to its potential.

The problem in the State is not too much public investment but too little, particularly in the context of the crisis in the private sector. This document does nothing to reverse the trend. In fact, it continues a level of stagnation in public investment.

When I heard the announcement of the capital plan and the amount of money involved, I was intrigued. I said to myself that perhaps the devil would be in the detail. Then I heard road jobs being announced and the announcement of the road from Tuam to Gort. I recalled that the work was nearly done, yet the project was announced again. I heard the plans for Moycullen being announced. I was out there recently and that project is very close to being done as well. I am not sure what the reason is for announcing some things several times.

Most of the budget for road construction is for maintenance. While I realise that roads need maintenance, the Government failed to take a great opportunity. In 2011 the Government decided to take the west of Ireland out of the TEN-T project. That could have resulted in funding of between 30% and 40% from the European Union, basically free, for core infrastructural projects between two countries. This is a missed opportunity.

We see where it has been landed, from Limerick to Dublin to Newry and from Cork to Dublin to Newry, and we wonder why. Most of the clout must be hitting that way.

It is welcome that funding of €450 million for nursing homes and the disabled was announced, but the sad reality is that we have asked what is being done a few times and no detail has been given. We hear every Deputy in the House talk about the need for social housing. It has been neglected down through the years. The effort that has been made this year in the counties I represent has been abysmal. We were given figures on what would be done in the last budget and were told billions would be spent. However, all we had were photo sessions with builders' hats on our heads and announcements about houses that were never built.

I spoke last week about the €9 billion the credit unions had to help the Government if social housing was required. In a time of need, the credit unions are willing to talk to the Government, but the Government does not seem to want to do so. It can borrow money elsewhere, but it must remember that every bit of interest it pays on moneys borrowed from groups such as the credit unions will be spent in our country, rather than going to a vulture fund or speculator living in another country trying to make money on the backs of the Irish people.

The children's hospital was announced for the fifth or sixth time. A spade has not yet been put into the ground. A previous Deputy referred to other hospital services being put out to Blanchardstown. I do not think anybody thought of people in the north, south, east and west of the country who travel with sick children. It would have been better to keep the hospital nearer to the M50. I travelled from the roundabout on the M50 today and the traffic was chaotic for the entire journey. A person from Cork, Limerick, Donegal, Sligo, Galway or Mayo travelling to St. James's Hospital will find the journey chaotic after travelling for two or three hours. Joined-up thinking is required. Mistakes have been made. At one stage the hospital was to be located in the middle of town and then it was supposed to be in St. James's Hospital. The children's hospital is supposed to be for all the children in the country. We need to make sure that we rethink the project.

Successive Governments have promised much and delivered little in terms of broadband. We have abysmal broadband. Everyone says the regions will be helped, but they cannot be helped if they do not have broadband. A broadband package has been announced. I attended a committee today and found out it will be next summer before we get the go-ahead from our masters in Europe to start the project. Rural parts of Ireland need infrastructure, including roads, which is why I have referred to the likes of the TEN-T project. If we want to make sure that we boost tourism in, for the sake of argument, the west of Ireland, and bring in manufacturing jobs, we will need core infrastructural projects. That means broadband and roads.

The IDA needs to get its act together and make sure that every announcement does not revolve around the financial centre or similar areas. While we welcome jobs in any part of the country, we need them in other parts of Ireland.

The Government seems to specialise in big and bold, but deceptive, headline announcements when it comes to spending. The latest example of this is the big, bold headline of €27 billion to be spent between now and 2021. Of course, why not have a 20-year plan with an even larger figure, or a 30-year or 50-year plan involving hundreds of billions of euro? It is completely deceptive because it does not tell us how it compares with capital investment when the level of capital investment was at a reasonable level prior to the crash, after which it collapsed. If one makes that comparison, one finds we still are nowhere near the level of public capital investment we had when there was a relatively reasonable public investment plan. Even then it was insufficient, to my mind.

At its height, there was public investment of about €9 billion a year. Broken down on a year-by-year basis, the Government's proposal is a fraction of that. As we know, there was chronic under-investment in water infrastructure and social housing, even at the height of the boom when we had lots of money. I could refer to many other areas, such as the chronic under-investment in public transport, even when the money was available to us.

I have mentioned forestry in the House many times. It is pathetic that the State forestry company cannot engage in afforestation even though we know the economic, social and cultural benefits that would derive from a serious public investment programme in forestry. None of that happened, even when we were spending twice or three times what has been proposed in this plan.

If one rolls up the figures of public investment over a long period of time, as this announcement does, it sounds great. However, when one breaks it down, one finds it is pathetic. It is well below the levels of public investment we had previously and, quite worryingly, it suggests that even by 2021 we will not have overcome the massive deficit that we now have in public capital investment arising from the crash and the austerity that has been imposed. We will still be well below the levels of public investment that we had prior to the crash, which is a very depressing picture of capital investment plans.

I will not discuss all of these areas; rather, I will discuss one in particular in the short time available, namely, housing. We have the rehash of announcements that have been made, whereby the figure of €3 billion has been extended by one year to add a few extra hundred million to it. The vast bulk of this is not real capital spending at all, because about 75% to 80% of the €3 billion support for the housing strategy will go to private landlords under the HAP scheme, which will not deliver. That is not just a prediction, because it has not delivered this year. The delivery promised was 8,400 new units under the HAP scheme, but I understand less than half that number have been delivered. I am not absolutely clear on the figures for the end of the year, but they are not anywhere near what we were promised. We know the figures will not be delivered because landlords are running away from arrangements with local authorities and have no intention of providing social housing when they can charge astronomical levels of rent in the private market. Why the hell would they? The plan is completely flawed and deceptive in the case of housing because it is not real public investment in building council housing, which would actually provide us with housing stock to deal with the housing crisis. It is a guaranteed recipe that the housing crisis will continue to get worse, notwithstanding big, bold announcements and large-sounding figures. The plan completely fails to deal with this emergency situation. If it cannot deal with an emergency, how can we give any credibility to the rest of the plan as actually delivering anything serious in terms of the massive injection of public capital investment we need to get the economy back on the rails?

I welcome the opportunity to say a few words, and I want to take up a point made by the previous speaker: his criticism of the lack of ambition in the capital programme. The ambition in the capital programme must be related to the relative position of the public finances. It is true to say the public finances have improved, but we are certainly not out of the woods. We still spend €5 billion more than we earn on an annual basis. If we continue to improve the public finances through prudent management it may be possible to add some additional projects in a mid-term review. There is no shortage of items for the shopping list that all of us in the House would like to see included. There are things I would love to have seen in the capital programme that are not in it, but it is grounded in reality related to the relative position of the public finances, and this is something we must bear in mind. It must be remembered this is borrowed money we are investing in critical public infrastructure. The list has been mentioned and includes housing, roads, broadband and hospitals. It is worth bearing in mind that when we came into office we could not borrow money in the marketplace because the interest rates were in excess of 15%. Now we can borrow money at the same interest rate as countries such as the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom. This is because we are considered to be a good bet by people who lend us the money, as they think they will get it back. Perhaps if we continue to prudently manage the public finances, other items can be added in the mid-term review.

I want to deal with a couple of issues which are in the capital programme, including the road from the county boundary in my constituency to a point east of Macroom, the Ballyvourney-Macroom N22 improvement. The cost-benefit analysis associated with this is one of the highest for any national road project. It is included in the five-year capital programme, and the critical issue is to get this project to a stage at which construction can begin. It is a long construction process and will take a number of years. We need to get it to a stage at which construction can begin as quickly as possible. The merits of the project speak for themselves. Regrettably, there have been accidents involving pedestrians and cars, including some fatalities. The economic benefit not only to Macroom and its hinterland but to the entire south-west region is inextricably tied up with the project, and I welcome its inclusion.

I share the views expressed by Deputy Fitzmaurice on broadband. I do not claim to be an expert on the technology, but as a representative of a rural constituency I have found that when one contacts eir, which we must remember is now a private company, and ask it to make an exchange broadband-enabled, unless it is on Patrick Street or the main street of the big town it is not interested. Of the €275 million included for broadband, which is as critical now to modern-day living as running water or rural electrification was many years ago, would it be possible, without compromising the national broadband plan, to direct some of this funding towards making a host of eir exchanges throughout the country broadband-enabled? The lessons we can learn retrospectively about how Eircom was privatised are myriad, but we must look forward rather than backwards, and perhaps this is something we could look at with a view to improving the service for many thousands of people the length and breadth of the country. Unfortunately, we will be waiting for the main players to arrive at a crossroads to deliver broadband. A consultation process on the national broadband scheme is ongoing, but we need something immediate. I do not know the cost of making the remaining eir exchanges broadband-enabled, so to some extent I am speaking in a vacuum, but I would like it be investigated. It would help improve the service for many people who do not have an acceptable level of service.

I want to speak about education, as €3.8 billion is available for investment in primary, secondary and third-level school buildings and universities. It is a great tribute to the Government that at a time of significant challenges in the public finances and a baby boom we were able over recent years to ensure every child had access to classroom space. Many school buildings are long overdue renewal. In particular I want to mention two schools which I hope will be included in the capital projects. One is De La Salle College in Macroom, which is looking for a new school with an autism spectrum disorder, ASD, element in it. Investment has been made in a number of ASD units at primary level in the region, but these children are moving through the education system and it is incumbent on all of us to ensure adequate facilities are available at local level. Unfortunately, at present, many of these children travel 20 or 30 miles to the nearest facility, and it would be appropriate, having availed of ASD units in many of the schools around Macroom, that they have an opportunity to progress to second level with a local ASD unit attached to a new De La Salle College in Macroom. The other school I want to mention - I am conscious that my time is practically up and I do not want to delay Deputy Breen, who I am sure has words of wisdom - is Clondrohid national school. It has multiple prefabricated classrooms and a number of ASD units, including a new temporary ASD classroom for next September. A new school was originally announced by Deputy Micheál Martin back in 1997 when he was Minister, but it still has not happened. The centenary celebrations were in 1996 and the then Minister, Deputy Martin, came down in 1997 and promised a new school, but it still has not been delivered. We need to look forwards, not backwards. Will the Minister for Education and Skills take these two specific schools into account in terms of the capital programme?

I welcome the opportunity to speak in the debate. Over the past four years, the Government has made significant progress in transforming the economy from the basket case of Europe to the fastest-growing economy in Europe. Maintaining fiscal prudence and stability is critical to the ongoing recovery as we emerge from the recession. This is why the plan is important. It is based on what we can deliver, as other Government speakers have said. We certainly do not want to make the mistakes we made in the past again.

Deputy Creed and previous speakers spoke about broadband. Broadband is one of the most important issues facing the country and needs to be delivered to every part of the country. I hope the investment put into broadband will deliver, because it is the future for rural Ireland. We talk about sustaining rural Ireland. The only thing that will sustain rural Ireland is broadband, so that people can work at home in their houses. The other day I heard an auctioneer say the first thing asked by a person who wants to buy a house in the country is whether the area has a broadband service. If there is broadband people will work from home. They will buy houses in the country. It is obviously important for people to live in the country. Their children will go to school. It is critical that we invest in broadband and I hope we have high-speed broadband in every part of Ireland by 2020.

Transport is an important part of the plan, and it is important to know there is much work ongoing. In the Leas-Cheann Comhairle's constituency, the N17-N18 Tuam-Gort bypass is making huge and fast progress, and it will open up the entire west of Ireland. It is also creating many jobs at present, and this is extremely important. Most economists who have spoken about the plan have said it will deliver and that it is unlike other plans, particularly the previous Government's plans, with Bertie bowls and things we could not afford.

As Deputy Creed said, €3.8 billion will be invested in education, and I welcome the fact that two schools in Ennis have been included. These are the Christian Brothers national school and Scoil Chríost Rí in Cloughleigh. I hope that Sixmilebridge national school can also be included. Huge money has been invested in schools, and this is important.

More money is going into health care. Limerick Regional Maternity Hospital is being transferred to the University Hospital Limerick, which is an important factor because experts throughout the world believe it is important to have the two hospitals alongside each other.

Today, in my own constituency, over €1.4 million has been allocated by the Office of Public Works to Clare County Council for agricultural land embankments, etc., damaged during the flooding and storms in 2014. That is a significant amount of money going into west Clare. Never before has that kind of money been put into embankments and coastal protection measures for agricultural land by a Government.

There is much happening. I have mentioned the health services. There is also the Shannon bridge crossing at Killaloe, which is most welcome. Killaloe has a strong reputation as a tourist town and the current bridge is unable to handle the high volume of traffic going over the bridge to Ballina. The construction of a new crossing will be a major boost for east Clare and particularly for the tourism sector. I hope it will come about as soon as possible.

There is much in this plan, and significant investment has been put into hospitals in Clare, including Regina House in Kilrush and Ennistymon community hospital. The Minister will be down on 19 October to lay the foundation stone for phase two at Raheen hospital. The whole of society will benefit from this plan. From an education perspective, new facilities will be provided at primary, secondary and third levels. There will be improved road infrastructure in the country, although there is one project that is not in the plan, which disappoints me - the motorway from Limerick to Cork, which would have completed the loop and linked all of our cities. I hope there might be a change of heart and the project could be included in the plan. It would be very important for the mid-west and south of Ireland. Nevertheless, this is a good plan and, as I mentioned, most economists have welcomed it because they see the possibility of its completion. I have no doubt that the country will be much better off as a result of this. Jobs will be created in the construction phases of the plan. It is realistic, affordable and prioritises what is really needed in our road, rail, health, education and broadband infrastructures. It will make a difference to many communities across the island.

Like previous speakers, I welcome the opportunity to respond to the debate on the capital development programme announced last week. It is a short window in which to speak, but in the main I hope to address the issues for which I have responsibility as Opposition spokesperson on the environment and, specifically, Irish Water and the housing elements.

We welcome a development plan such as this, which seeks to prioritise capital investment in our infrastructure for the next five years. One must acknowledge the fact that we are able to do so again and that the Government has completed the necessary one third of the overall adjustment required to stabilise our finances. In parallel to that, a strong dollar and sterling, along with the stabilisation of our wage structure and costs, have assisted our exports and would have helped job creation. Nevertheless, people say on a regular basis that they do not feel or see the recovery and that it appears to be centred in Dublin and the east coast. That is very obvious to many of us, and there should have been a concerted effort in this plan to address that imbalance. I am not sure that has happened.

A point was made relating to education. It is amazing that when an election is being spoken about, this Government talks about the great restraint it has shown and the lessons it has learned from the past, yet we see a headline with a quote attributed to the Minister for Finance promising iPads for all school children throughout the country. That is in a time when pupil-teacher ratios need to be adjusted and pressure is being exerted on special needs assistants, capitation grants and small rural schools with two, three or four teachers. There are many issues that must be addressed in education before we go down the road of keeping children's heads in screens all day long. There is much more to education than that, although it is necessary to have broadband and communications support available for education and homes. As previous speakers have indicated, it is an aspect of life that is similar to many other services, and it is only right and proper that there should be a greater effort to make broadband available throughout the country and in rural areas in particular. I hope that pushing this out to 2020 will not be a cop-out and there can be more of a targeted effort to address that imbalance.

I have questions relating to my area of responsibility, as I mentioned. Irish Water is mentioned within the capital development plan, with €3.8 billion to €4 billion spent in the area over the next seven years, inclusive of this year. Today, Irish Water issued a plan for the next seven years to 2021, inclusive of this year, in which it indicates that €5.5 billion will be spent. As is usual with every announcement emanating from Irish Water, or from the Government on behalf of or relating to Irish Water, I am puzzled but not surprised. The EUROSTAT tests demonstrated that the model created by the Government, along with the methods behind it, have not stacked up. As much as the Government wanted this off-balance-sheet, it remains firmly on the balance sheet. The costs associated with Irish Water remain firmly in the hands of the taxpayer.

There is a hole in the figures, with up to €1.7 billion unaccounted for. This year, for example, €75 million is to be paid in water grants, and there will be €20 million in administration costs and another €40 million for metering. There will be a loss this year, but Irish Water indicated today that it will have €2 billion in residential charge income over the next six years. It is just not possible. The company's figures are based on an 80% compliance rate, but even with that rate it is not possible. Irish Water intends to borrow based on the income stream it has, meaning it will pay far in excess of what the Government and the National Treasury Management Agency are borrowing. The only way to close the gap is to increase residential water charges. It is high time somebody came clean on this sorry mess or eventually realised that the company is going nowhere, so the exercise needs to be brought to a halt and started again. Irish Water will continue to throw good money after bad at the expense of the taxpayer.

Despite what we hear in today's spin, less is being spent on the maintenance and servicing of our network this year than was spent in the years of the previous Government. Irish Water would have us believe that it will spend €660 million per year over the next six years, based on figures that do not stack up and without acknowledging administration and salary costs and commitments in various contracts. The company will continue to spend less than the amount spent by the previous Administration under a different regime. This is against a backdrop of an assumption that 1,200 workers will be taken out of Irish Water. Those workers will be taken from the pool of people who were doing the work even before Irish Water came into being. The consultants and those in the higher tiers of management will remain, along with associated bonuses. The company made a so-called commitment to former local authority staff with the service level agreement to 2025, but they are now to be discarded. It is time somebody came clean about this, and perhaps this debate offers an opportunity for the Government to tell us about the gap in the figures and how Irish Water intends to fill it.

From my perspective, the Government intends to fill it from people's pockets, whether in the form of general taxation, extra taxation, increased water charges or increased cost to the taxpayer because of the high interest rates they are paying on their borrowings.

The other point I want to make about housing is that we have had three separate announcements of the housing construction programme: last November, last March and again last week, down in Heuston Station. They have not built three houses in my county, but they have had three launches of this massive development programme. Then they tagged on another €400 million and put an extra year on it. That is because the commitments they made last November for this year have not been met and the money has not been spent, so it is easy to throw it on the back of this plan.

The Government has not delivered on any commitment in respect of the emergency in the housing sector. There has been talk of emergency legislation to fast-track planning in respect of any proposals that are brought forward to meet the current emergency. Another week has gone by with no legislation. The Whips have been meeting and there is no talk of any legislation next week. One begins to wonder whether the Government is going to rush to the country because it cannot meet some of the commitments it has made in recent weeks and is afraid of being exposed on that.

Another issue, as I said in the course of debate on this issue in recent weeks, is vacant units and the myth that the Minister and the Taoiseach created by saying money is not an issue in respect of the funding required to put them back in use. That has been contradicted fervently by officials I have spoken to in local authorities. I will use this opportunity to place that contradiction on the record and will ask some member of Government to respond accordingly.

The Government has also rubbished figures that have emanated from local authorities in respect of the actual numbers on the waiting list and the number of vacant units throughout the country. To continually ballyrag those people is not addressing the issue at hand, which is what people want. They want to hear the issues at hand acknowledged, appreciated and addressed in real and meaningful ways. That is the immediacy of the problem we find there and into the short and long term, as provided for in this capital spending plan.

The next speaking slot is shared by the Minister of State, Deputy Jimmy Deenihan, and Deputy Tony McLoughlin. Cúig nóiméad an duine.

I will give Deputy McLoughlin three minutes.

Like previous speakers, I welcome Building on Recovery: Infrastructure and Capital Investment 2016-2021. As the Minister said, the Government is revising upwards its capital expenditure commitment for the remainder of the decade, and this capital report presents a new €42 billion multi-annual capital investment programme. Over the period 2016 to 2021, the planned investments will cement economic recovery and help to lay the foundations for continued growth and broad-based prosperity for the next decade and beyond. It is very important to have a clear-cut plan, as we now have.

I would like to point out some elements of this plan, including the commitment in the plan of €7.5 million for the Kerry sports academy, which is planned for the Institute of Technology in Tralee. Deputy Spring has a similar interest in this project. The Institute of Technology in Tralee is a key driver of economic and social development for County Kerry. It was established in 1977, approved by the then Fine Gael Minister for education, Peter Barry. It has more than 3,000 full-time students, employs 350 staff and provides a financial contribution of about €60 million to the local authority. In March 2014 the institute established a foundation to assist with fundraising for future developments, with the priority project being the Kerry sports academy. The director of the fundraising initiative was a former colleague of mine, Ogie Moran. We played together for a number of years. He has shown tremendous leadership in ensuring that this project will go ahead. The foundation also comprises people such as Dick Spring, the former Minister for Foreign Affairs; Stan McCarthy, CEO of the Kerry Group; Pat O'Leary of Liebherr Container Cranes; Mícheál Ó Muircheartaigh; Oliver Murphy; and Bríd McElligott. It is a very powerful group of people. As we know, the institute has an esteemed international reputation for leadership in inclusion and adapted physical activity and is the only higher education provider globally to be awarded a UNESCO chair. This is testimony to the excellence of the institute's work in including people with disabilities in physical education, sport fitness and recreation. The sports academy is the next capital project to be undertaken under the institute's master development plan. It will allow sportspersons, able and disabled, to enjoy, prepare and compete to the highest standards. The foundation is confident, now that it has been granted 50% funding for the project, that it will be able to raise the remainder of the funds. To date, it has secured about €5 million, of which €1 million is from the institute, €1 million from the GAA, €1 million from the J.P. McManus Benevolent Fund, €1 million from private donations and €650,000 from Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann. Hopefully this project will start in the very near future, and but for this programme it would not have got off the ground.

The other project to which I would like to refer briefly is the N22 and its importance to both Kerry and Cork, particularly south Kerry. The business and tourist communities in the south west are very dependent on it for connectivity with Cork and beyond. The Ballyvourney to Macroom section of the N22 is in very poor condition, and is widely recognised as needing immediate improvement. The National Roads Authority and Cork County Council have recognised this, and have successfully taken an improvement scheme through An Bord Pleanála, as well as other measures. I hope, now that it is included in the capital investment programme, that work will commence as soon as possible. All the necessary statutory approvals are in place, compulsory purchase orders have been put on the land, and advance work such as archaeology has been carried out. This could readily be developed under a public private partnership, for example, because it is shovel-ready and would not require any great level of up-front State funding.

Before I hand over to Deputy McLoughlin, I must mention that there is a commitment of €275 million for national broadband roll-out. One of the major disadvantages in County Kerry is the absence of high-quality broadband. There is broadband available, but it does not have the same speed and bandwidth as Dublin and other centres of population. We are finding it increasingly difficult to attract industry to Kerry because of the lack of high-quality broadband. It is something we have to improve. Eir has proposals, as does Vodafone with SIRO, but we need to see action as soon as possible. With this provision and the new national broadband programme, I hope it will be rolled out.

There is also €430 million in flood risk management. I was very disappointed that the Cashen River was not included, because the Minister has visited it and seen for himself how the system has broken down there. Because of silting, the measures put in place in the early 1950s are no longer effective, resulting in large-scale flooding, with thousands of acres of land being flooded and over 600 homes threatened. I hope this river can be included in the programme in the future.

I wish to begin by welcoming the Government's new capital investment plan which will ensure that over €27 billion will be spent on vital State infrastructure, including schools, hospitals and roads between 2016 and 2021. This new capital investment plan is affordable and sensible and it is consistent with the Government's plan to eliminate borrowing by 2018. As well as providing improved State infrastructure, the plan will also promote regional economic growth, supporting 45,000 construction jobs over the lifetime of the plan.

It is clear to see that the economic decisions taken by this Government have brought us to an important time in our national recovery. We are now, once again, the fastest growing economy in Europe and we are creating over 1,300 new jobs a week. This new capital plan will help to spread this recovery around the country where we know many families have yet to feel its effects.

In particular, I am delighted that the provision of €102 million in funding for the upgrade of the N4 in County Sligo and also that the construction of a new €20 million bridge over the Garavogue River in Sligo Town have been included in the plan. When I spoke with the Taoiseach and the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Donohoe, about these two vital projects, I impressed upon them the urgent need to secure funding for them in this plan. I advised them both that these were two vital components of the future economic development of County Sligo.

The Acting Chairman, Deputy Twomey, may be aware that the Collooney-to-Castlebaldwin section of the N4 is one of the most deadly strips of road in the country, with 30 tragic fatalities occurring on this section of road over the past two decades. This particular road had been neglected time and again under consecutive Fianna Fáil Governments over the past 20 years. Therefore, I am delighted that despite the constraints on the national finances at present, this Fine Gael-led Government has now delivered funding for this vital piece of road infrastructure to the people of Sligo.

The N4 upgrade will be a significant boost to County Sligo and the wider north-west region. Full planning permission has already been secured for the N4 extension and with the funding now in place, plans to build it can proceed immediately. Infrastructure developments such as the N4 will be crucial in attracting inward investment to the region, not to mention increased tourists visiting the county.

I reiterate these two particular projects contained in this plan are crucial for the ongoing drive to create jobs in County Sligo. We are making significant progress in fixing our local economy and attracting investment to Sligo at present. The fact that Sligo will receive two of the biggest road infrastructure projects in this plan will benefit these attempts and I look forward to the funding being provided.

I wish to share time with Deputy Ó Caoláin.

I will touch on the education aspect, as that is my own portfolio. I will acknowledge that there is significant funding going in between now and 2021 of €3.8 billion. Unfortunately, that will only be able to match the growth in demographics. We will cater for the peak in students which are coming on line. At primary school, we are looking at a peak in 2018 and for post-primary, I think it is 2020. Yesterday when I discussed this issue with the Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Jan O'Sullivan, I said we need to be looking at education in longer planning terms than merely five and six-year capital programmes. The reason is because everything we are putting into the capital programme currently for education, as I stated, is only meeting the demographics.

We have one of the highest pupil-teacher ratios, PTRs, in Europe. All of the evidence would suggest that the smaller the classrooms, the better the educational outcomes and something we need to strive for as a policy is to reduce the PTR, particularly at primary level, and at post-primary level. One of the issues, which the Minister for Education and Skills admitted yesterday, is if we were to plan to reduce the PTR, the Department does not know how many additional spaces it would need and it cannot plan for that eventuality. If one reduces the PTR, coupled with increased demographics, capacity will become an issue. What the Minister is doing in the education capital programme is only standing still. We are only meeting the rise in the number of places that will be demanded.

The other area I want to touch on - I only have two minutes - is the flood defences for Cork. I very much welcome the fact that we will see the flood defences for Cork city, particularly Blackpool, commence in 2016 - that is the aim - and the commencing of the phased construction of the flood defences in Cork city in 2017. I am a little concerned at the amount of capital funding we are allocating for it. Much discussion has taken place between the Department, the OPW and Cork City Council and Cork County Council in relation to what is needed as part of the flood defences in Cork. Some of the conservative estimates suggest it will cost between €100 million to €115 million, and yet we are only allocating in total, between now and 2021, €430 million. We are allocating €45 million next year and €45 million the following year, and that is to cover all of the State. Therefore, I have some concerns that we will not have enough funding in place to carry out the necessary works. Having said that, the scheme will take four to five years to complete for Cork city.

However, the pressing issue in Cork is really the area of Blackpool, which has flooded several times. There is very little work needed to be done on it. It is in relation to one particular culvert, which needs to be dug up and replaced. That design, I believe, is going to tender shortly.

The last area I will touch on is the housing capital budget, which we all have recognised is a significant issue. I am aware that the funds from the sale of Bord Gáis Éireann of in the region of €500 million will be earmarked for voluntary housing schemes but the actual capital investment in housing will not be enough to meet the demand.

The recent announcement by the Government of its capital spending plan amounts to very little, and is extremely unambitious. It is alarming to note that in 2020, even with this plan, we will still have the second lowest capital spend per GDP in Europe.

As the Sinn Féin spokesperson on health, I found the particular announcement by the Minister, Deputy Varadkar, and the Minister of State, Deputy Kathleen Lynch, of a 2016-21 health capital allocation of €3.061 billion to be utterly farcical. Much of what is involved has already been signalled, if not already committed to, and there is a relatively small additional sum of €568 million.

I noted with interest some trends in capital spending on health over the past number of years and the expected capital spend for the years ahead. The figures I found were: €598 million in 2008, €366 million in 2010, €414 million committed for 2016 and €600 million in 2021. This means that even in nominal terms the spending on the health capital budget will only be the same in 2021 as it was in 2008, 13 years earlier. In real terms, taking inflation into account and adjusted per capita, this represents a significant cut over these years, and over all the years in between, courtesy of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Labour. According to CSO figures, the population will have grown by 8.3% over that time and if one also assumes average annual inflation of 1.5%, then the real per capita cut to the health capital budget is exactly one third.

A litany of events have shown how disorganised our health service is as a result of the Government's policy. Fine Gael and Labour have failed those in the hospital system and this announcement will do little to alleviate the serious problems that exist. The Government is ever quick to use public money to buy a headline and pretend it is solving a problem. This so-called plan contains no mention of additional capacity in the Government's stated intent to "replace, upgrade and refurbish" community based nursing units for older people and accommodation for people with disabilities.

Emergency department services have been at crisis point for some time, as regularly highlighted by the trolley watch survey carried out by the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation, INMO. The trolley crisis is not just an emergency department crisis but a symptom of the malaise that is endemic across the wider health system. It is primarily due to a lack of capacity resulting from the chronic failure by the Government to provide adequate funding to the public health system and there is no reference in this plan to addressing this serious problem.

Our health emergency is a crisis of unequal access to a health system which has an overall capacity far short of what is needed. Demand will increase year on year. From the older person languishing on a hospital trolley in an overcrowded accident and emergency department to the young child waiting two years for speech and language therapy, the root problem is undercapacity. The Minister needs to cut out the bluff and secure funds to get patients off lists and into procedures that can both save and enrich lives.

I welcome the capital investment plan of €27 billion over the coming years. The plan is possible thanks to the work the Government has done to get the country back on track. Not many years ago, members of the Opposition were crying that the troika should take away its money. Had we done it, we would have no money today to invest in the plan. For people to sit here and criticise the plan because it does not go far enough, after they wanted to tell the troika to go away with its money, is laughable. The plan involves €5 billion every year for the next six years, which equates to approximately €1,000 for every man woman and child for every year of the life of the plan. It is a significant investment which will create many jobs in various sectors which will improve performance across every sector of Irish society, including education, broadband, housing, health and transport. I will focus on transport in my short contribution.

I welcome many of the schemes that will get the go-ahead, such as the Laytown to Bettystown link road which as a councillor I pushed for many years. I am glad to see it is in the plan. I am also glad to see the commitment to improved North-South links. We are all aware of the importance of the A5 road. It is also important that the Slane bypass is included, given that the N2 is a very important North-South route. The Slane bypass has been proposed for many decades. It almost came to fruition a number of years ago, but did not get through the planning process. I am glad to see there is a commitment to it. It is needed in terms of road safety and congestion in Slane village. Now that the money is there, the council will come forward and push for a new application to be made so this important piece of infrastructure can be put in place as soon as possible.

I am also glad to see the focus in the plan on cost-benefit analysis. It is very important that we get value for money from our €27 billion. In a previous role, I was an investment appraisal manager on capital expenditure schemes, and I know how important it is that we rigorously examine the investment. I am glad to see the new code proposes that appraisals will be carried out on schemes of €20 million in value as opposed to €30 million. I am also glad the Government will be asked to approve any expenditure on schemes over €100 million as opposed to over €250 million. It will give confidence to the many people who are concerned about some of the projects, such as the €2.4 billion metro north scheme.

I am concerned, given that insufficient work has been done on the appraisal of the metro north scheme. The Fingal-North Dublin Transport Study - Stage One Appraisal Study, done in November 2014, ten months ago, states on page 79, "Modelling of passenger demand was not feasible at this preliminary appraisal stage". However, conclusions and choices are made on the basis of a rodentine analysis. While I am very concerned about the analysis to date on metro north, I am glad to see that in this plan there will be continuous analysis of the schemes. I am glad to see the plan states that if schemes further down the road do not satisfy cost-benefit analyses, they will be scrapped and the money will be invested elsewhere. The vital thing is that anything we do with this public money gives a decent return to the Irish taxpayer. If the money is better spent elsewhere, in education, broadband or health, we need to ensure it is targeted at the sectors that give the best value for money. I support the plan. I am particularly glad to see the emphasis on effectiveness of spend and the cost-benefit analysis that will be required for smaller schemes. I have no doubt the investment will lead to many new jobs and improved performance across every sector of society.

I welcome the fact the Minister is here. Austerity is finished and prosperity is becoming the new word in budgeting, projections and planning. I take issue with some of the comments, particularly from the Opposition benches. I welcome the fact that we have statements around the capital plan. On the day the Government announced a prudent and purposeful investment of €27 billion to better the State for the people, with no Bertie bowls or follies, the three Opposition party leaders, in their wisdom, could not even bring themselves to discuss it during Leaders' Questions. The Government is to invest €27 billion plus an additional €15 billion, which brings it up to €42 billion. This is an unimaginable feat for a Government that, four and a half years ago, faced into a wind that told us we were the fastest contracting economy in Europe. We are now the fastest growing economy not just in Europe but in the developed world, a far cry from where we started.

I will focus on what has been achieved in my area. I thank the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy Howlin, for being prudent and purposeful in every step he has taken to ensure that issues, topics and plans that were not for the betterment of society have not made it into the plan. The amount of money that will be spent will be large but will be spread across the regions. In my area I thank my fellow Kerryman, Deputy Brendan Griffin, for help around some of the projects. He is an ardent supporter of the Macroom bypass. I also thank my Fine Gael colleague in Cork, Deputy Michael Creed, who also placed a particular emphasis on it. While many would say the Kerry people built the Cork and Kerry mountains to keep the Cork people out, we are building a road to bring them in and out now so that we can get a few tourists from it.

I would like to acknowledge that County Kerry has not enjoyed the uplift experienced in counties like Dublin, Galway and Cork in areas like tourism, energy, engineering, agribusiness and micro-enterprises. We need improvements in road and broadband infrastructure. As my colleague, Deputy Hannigan, has mentioned, some €275 million is to be spent on broadband. As she is responsible for rural affairs, I am sure the Minister of State, Deputy Ann Phelan, will agree it is wonderful that we will be able to conduct business in a modern fashion as a result of this development. Would she believe it is being done as we speak, at the back of the house we are renting? Our electricity was turned off today for the purposes of putting the cables through. This shows that the plan is being put into action.

We have built over 300 schools during our time in government. The growth in our population is greater than that of any other country in Europe. This means we have to build new schools so that children will be able to find schools. This is a core principle of the Labour Party. It is one that we are very happy to be involved in as we go forward. It is correct to plan for what needs to be done over the next five years to develop hospitals, roads and sports capital projects. It is not all about the simplistic infrastructure parts - it is also about people having a standard of life and enjoying football, rugby and hurling clubs and everything that goes with such activities.

I wish to mention the extension of the Institute of Technology, Tralee, a project on which I have worked exceptionally hard. I thank the president of the college and his staff who assisted with this project, particularly Dr. Oliver Murphy, Bríd McElligott and Ogie Moran. Over a number of meetings in recent years, they helped me to convey to the Minister, Deputy Howlin, the importance of this facility, which will facilitate the provision of the only UNESCO chair for disabilities in the country. In addition, it will provide a home for CARA in County Kerry and the centre of excellence of Kerry GAA. It will also be a place where Irish culture can be celebrated on Saturday mornings, when 300 or 400 people will be able to come through the Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann facility. We were not in a position to fund projects of this nature over the past number of years, but we are able to do so now.

The Minister of State, Deputy Ann Phelan, will hear me waxing lyrical forever and a day about the development of simple infrastructure like cycle ways as part of the development of a better standard of living. Deputies will have heard me talking about the Tralee to Fenit route, which I expect to see developed under this plan. I assume the local authority will be in a position to accept any money that is offered for these purposes on this occasion, unlike the last time it was offered. That will enable this project to be developed for the betterment of everybody who favours projects of this nature. I am sorry I am short on time. There is a great deal in this €42 billion plan. As a House, we should welcome this good news. It is not unambitious; it is prudent and purposeful.

There are two minutes remaining for Deputy Joan Collins.

It is hardly worth my while speaking for two minutes. I will take this opportunity to say that I take umbrage with some of what has been said by backbenchers on the Government side. I remind them that €30 billion was taken out of this economy and out of people's pockets. That is why we are in a position where things have turned around. After every recession we move into a boom, and after every boom we move into a recession. The role of the Government is to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected regardless of what is happening.

The only point I want to make on the capital spending plan is that we have not seen any increase to deal with the humanitarian crisis in housing. It is absolutely incredible that no extra money has been provided. It is very clear that just one in four of the houses that are planned to be built will be social housing. It is evident that 75% of housing will be built by private investors. As a result, I do not think we will see the housing that is needed. We need 130,000 social houses over the next two or three years to try to deal with this issue. In this context, I am reminded of a leaflet that was circulated by Deputy Eric Byrne when he was a member of Dublin City Council. It relates to the crisis that was being faced in the 2008-09 period as we came out of the boom. I agree that there was a crisis at that time. The leaflet mentioned that many people were fortunate enough to own their own homes in Dublin and noted that Deputy Byrne's motion declaring a housing emergency was an attempt to shock the Government into taking action. He has certainly not shocked his own party into taking action to deal with the humanitarian crisis we are now facing. It is a shame that this capital programme is not even attempting to deal with this issue, which is being faced by many people.

I call the Minister of State, Deputy Ann Phelan, to bring the debate to a conclusion.

I remind Deputy Joan Collins that this Government has launched the biggest house-building strategy ever undertaken in the history of the State. We all know it takes time to build houses.

The Minister of State and her colleagues have been in government for almost five years.

One of the reasons we are in this crisis is the decision of the Fianna Fáil-Green Party Administration to take responsibility for building away from local authorities. When I was a member of Kilkenny County Council, I spoke out against this at length. My colleagues and I wanted to stop all of the expertise from being taken away from the county councils. We foretold that this would happen if this responsibility was taken from the county councils. We talked about rent regulation. Some of our Fianna Fáil colleagues across the council chamber often said we were anti-development. We called for regulation of the tax incentives for hotels that were being built during the boom and an examination of the effect the new hotels would have on the existing industry. They had an effect on the existing industry. When the crash came, we all suffered.

This capital programme should be considered by comparison with what we were at in 2011. Nobody would have believed at that time that we could deliver this programme four and a half years later. I think this capital programme is very much to be welcomed. If people are mealy-mouthed about it, that is entirely their opinion. I think it is a fantastic programme. I suggest that in time, it will be seen as a great and well-delivered programme. As my colleague, the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, has said, it is a prudent capital programme. Despite the worst economic downturn in the history of the State, we have provided for a huge schools building programme. I think this Government has done a great job. I am looking forward to living in Ireland in the future and availing of all the projects that are contained in this capital programme.

Sitting suspended at 7.28 p.m. and resumed at 7.30 p.m.
Top
Share