Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 20 Jul 2016

Vol. 919 No. 1

Planning and Development (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2016: First Stage

I move:

That leave be granted to introduce a Bill entitled an Act to amend the Planning and Development Act 2000 by the deletion of section 28(1C), and to provide for related matters.

In his absence I would like to thank Deputy Willie Penrose, who proposed the Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill 2016. I now have the image of the Taoiseach and Deputy Willie Penrose line-dancing in the AV room at the launch of his Bill. It will take me some time to get that disturbing image out of my head.

Deputy Ó Broin might join them.

I may well do that. The Bill I am introducing seeks to reverse a particularly bad decision of the former Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Alan Kelly. Last year he made a very controversial amendment to the Planning and Development Act which allowed the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, for the first time in planning history, to place specific planning policy requirements on local authorities. This amendment essentially gave the power to the Minister to impose very detailed planning proposals on local authorities irrespective of what the democratically agreed councillors in those areas had agreed to in their county development plans or local area plans. Members will remember that this amendment was used only once, very controversially, to reduce the minimum apartment size that local authorities are allowed to approve in planning, which obviously will result in substandard and sub-sized apartment accommodation into the future. What this Bill seeks to do in a very simple way is to repeal the controversial power that was given to the Minister by himself and by the Government of the day, and also to allow local authorities to determine, as is their statutory responsibility and democratic entitlement, the most appropriate planning frameworks for their development plans or local area plans.

Is the Bill being opposed?

Question put and agreed to.

Since this is a Private Members' Bill, Second Stage must, under Standing Orders, be taken in Private Members' time.

I move: "That the Bill be taken in Private Members' time."

Question put and agreed to.
Top
Share