I move:
That Dáil Éireann:
notes that:
— more than 150,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded in Gaza since Israel began its military operation more than 12 months ago;
— among this number are more than 43,000 people who have been confirmed dead, two-thirds of whom are women and children;
— more than 90 per cent of Gaza's population have been displaced, and nearly 70 per cent of its buildings destroyed or damaged;
— Israeli missiles have targeted hospitals, schools, universities, United Nations (UN) facilities, refugee camps, bakeries, bread mills, farms, places of worship, and critical infrastructure like sanitation, water and communication facilities;
— the Israeli blockade means 83 per cent of required food aid is not entering Gaza;
— water production capacity has dropped to just 5 per cent of its usual daily output;
— the entire population in Gaza faces food insecurity, and the numbers experiencing catastrophic hunger are set to imminently double to nearly 400,000 people;
— in October 2024, a UN report found that Israel has perpetrated a concerted policy to destroy Gaza's healthcare system as part of a broader assault on Gaza, committing war crimes and the crimes against humanity of extermination; and
— on 28th October, 2024, the Israeli parliament voted to ban the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the largest provider of humanitarian aid in Gaza and the Occupied Territories, from the country within 90 days;
agrees that:
— Ireland ratified the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, known as the Genocide Convention, in 1976;
— under the Convention, genocide is defined as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part;
— under Article 1 of the Convention, State parties to the Genocide Convention have an obligation to take measures to prevent genocide; and
— no armed attack on a state's territory, even a heinous attack involving an atrocity crime like the attack by Hamas on Israel, and the taking of hostages on 7th October, 2023, can ever justify, or provide a defence to, breaches of the Genocide Convention;
further agrees that a genocide is being perpetrated before our eyes by Israel in Gaza, and Ireland has a legal and moral duty to do whatever we can to prevent it; and
calls on the Government to:
— immediately suspend all military trade with Israel;
— immediately suspend dual-use licences to Israel;
— immediately suspend the use of Irish airspace and airports for weapons transfers to Israel; and
— immediately impose trade, travel and diplomatic sanctions on Israel.
We bring forward this motion with no joy or satisfaction. It is with a heavy heart and an unshakeable sense of duty that we confront what is unfolding before us and what we see very clearly in Gaza, namely, a genocide that is happening in real time. Recognising genocide in this House is a grave responsibility, but it is also a necessity. Such recognition removes from any grounds on which future generations might look back and say they did not know. We cannot allow history to ask why we were content with being the very least bad when it came to action to prevent genocide and call it out. We must speak with clarity and conscience, standing firm in our commitments to condemn this atrocity, but also do all within our power to stop it.
As we consider this motion, I acknowledge with respect and sorrow the historical suffering of the Jewish people, victims of humanity's crime, genocide. So too do I acknowledge those victims of the Armenian genocide, the Rwandan genocide, the Srebrenica genocide and all the atrocities of the 20th and 21st centuries on which all of us looked back and said "never again". They endured horrors no human should ever face and systematic attempts to annihilate them that led the world to establish international institutions aimed at ensuring that such war crimes could never happen again. Those institutions are crumbling at the moment because of the indifference. When we were taught "never again", we committed that those words would hold true for all of humanity, no matter the oppressor, no matter the victim.
Today, it is precisely that commitment that compels us to act. What we are witnessing in Gaza is the systematic destruction of a people. Since Israel began its invasion more than 12 months ago, in excess of 150,000 Palestinians have been either killed or wounded. Among them, over 43,000 have been confirmed dead, two thirds of whom are women or children. Israeli missiles have levelled hospitals, schools, universities, UN facilities, refugee camps, bakeries, bread mills, farms and places of worship. Critical infrastructure for sanitation, water and communication lies in ruins. As we speak, 90% of Gaza's population has been displaced and 70% of its buildings have been destroyed or damaged by Israeli bombs. An Israeli blockade has restricted Gaza's food supply so severely that 83% of the required food aid is blocked from entering, while water production capacity has dropped to just 5% of what is needed. The entire population of Gaza faces food insecurity and the numbers enduring catastrophic hunger are to double imminently to nearly 400,000 people. Just last month, the United Nations released a report documenting Israel's deliberate policy to dismantle Gaza's healthcare system as part of a broader campaign of destruction, identifying these actions as war crimes and crimes against humanity, including extermination. Days later, on 28 October, the Israeli Parliament voted to expel the UN Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA, the main provider of humanitarian aid in Gaza and the occupied territories, from the country within 90 days. These are not isolated actions. They are hallmarks of genocide.
The Tánaiste, Deputy Micheál Martin, has previously condemned, and used the word "genocide" to describe, Russia's actions in Ukraine. If he can identify and condemn genocide when it occurs elsewhere, surely he must do so with the same honesty and resolve when it unfolds before our eyes in Gaza. This is not about political alignment or diplomatic posturing. It is about moral integrity and our fundamental human obligations. Ireland ratified the genocide convention in 1976. It sets out clear obligations for states to follow when there is evidence of genocide. Under Article 1, all state parties have an obligation not only to punish but to prevent genocide. This is not a passive responsibility. It requires us to actively take measures to halt actions that might contribute to the destruction of a people. Preventing genocide means that when we see evidence of such crimes unfolding, we cannot stand idly by. We must intervene, be that diplomatically or economically and through every legal means available to us.
Over the past year, we in the Social Democrats and others across the Chamber have brought forward a number of parliamentary motions asking for actions. Each time, they have been voted down or have been passed without any commitment to act. This obligation compels us to suspend any military trade that could support the perpetrators, to revoke dual licences for goods that could have military applications, to restrict the use of Irish airspace and airports for any weapons transfers, and to impose comprehensive trade, travel and diplomatic sanctions. When we signed that convention to prevent genocide, did we really believe that after a year of watching the annihilation of a people, we could point to the fact that while Ireland's voice has been undoubtedly stronger than most, the outcome remains the same? We are not meeting our obligations to prevent genocide, be that through indifference or not knowing. Neither is justifiable.
These actions are not only possible under the genocide convention; they are mandated when evidence of genocide is present. To fail in those obligations is very much to risk being complicit. We can be complicit in many ways, whether through indifference or whereby, when we are told certain actions that are happening in the Irish State are adding to Israel's capacity to annihilate the people of Gaza, we step back, question and equivocate to say that maybe we will act at some point in the future. We say that maybe we cannot act alone and that we have to bring our European partners with us, but at a certain point we have to stand up and do something.
Almost ten months ago, we brought forward a motion setting out actions that included expelling the Israeli ambassador, because we did not believe at that time that we could have normal diplomatic relations with a country so hellbent on annihilating the population of Gaza. We were shot down and told we were naive and did not understand the nuances of diplomacy. Ten months later, Gaza lies in ruins, with children under rubble. I recall a time in this Chamber when we debated whether Israel would actually bomb a hospital. It has now bombed every hospital. There was a time when we talked about whether we should use words such as "invasion" or even go further. At this point, not only have 90% of the population of Gaza been displaced; they have been consistently displaced. They have been told to move from northern Gaza to the south and been bombed when they got there. Nothing we have seen over the past year has suggested in any way that this will stop.
Only yesterday, I watched the Tánaiste question the motivations of people who sought to even highlight our difference. I will address some of those disparaging remarks he made about the online publication The Ditch, which has reported on the use of Irish airspace for munitions transfers bound for conflict zones and shared crucial information about US pressure over the occupied territories Bill passing. In a democracy, we cannot ignore or diminish voices that bring difficult truths to light, nor should we attempt to discredit the sources of uncomfortable information based on a perceived political bias. Questioning the political motivations of truth-tellers is a heinous practice. If applied to other media organisations that hold us to account, we would be rightly called out for it. A free press should be inclusive of all voices, especially those who dare to challenge powerful interests and bring uncomfortable facts to the public's attention. The uncomfortable fact in this instance is that through indifference, sovereign Irish airspace is being used to transfer munitions, and that fact only came to light because of the good work of the reporters.
The Irish people, as we know, understand suffering deeply. We remember our history of enforced famine, displacement, oppression and loss. It is our own history of starvation and enforced population decline that gives us a unique moral duty to speak up when we witness such suffering elsewhere. Irish people know the pain, and because of this we are called on to stand with those enduring it now. By not opposing this motion, the Government implicitly recognises the scale and nature of what is happening in Gaza. If the Government will not oppose it, it must accept that genocide is happening and that we have a duty to do all we can to stop it. This moment calls on us to fulfil our commitment to humanity. We must be able to look back with an assurance we did everything within our power to recognise, prevent and condemn the genocide and to seek action we believe can enforce consequences on the State of Israel to stop its barbarity in Gaza and the Palestinian lands.
By affirming this motion, we declare that we will not be silent and, beyond that, that we will act, because we have obligations to prevent genocide. Our voice has been strong and we have stood in a world that has increasingly looked away from the suffering, but we can go further. Israel needs to feel consequences now. Ours is a small nation but a proud one, and when we take a stand, others follow. Even this parliamentary recognition of genocide today is not going to do much to stop the suffering that people are experiencing in Gaza, but it can allow us to go further and take a stand to say we did everything we could and were not complicit.