I am the director general of the Environmental Protection Agency. Dr. Larkin is the deputy director general and director of the office of licensing and guidance within the EPA. We are delighted to appear before the committee and to help with any queries on the issues it has identified to us.
I prepared an opening statement. As one could write a book about the matters the Chairman mentioned, I tried to keep it as brief as possible. I will read the statement to put in context the discussion we may have subsequently.
The Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, is an independent public body established in 1993 under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992. Its sponsor in Government is the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. The EPA is managed by a full-time executive board that consists of a director general and four directors. The independence of the agency is assured through the selection procedures for the director general and directors and the freedom, as provided in the legislation, to act on its own initiative. The assignment, under the legislation, of direct responsibility for a wide range of functions underpins this independence. Under legislation, it is a specific offence to attempt to influence the agency, or anyone acting on its behalf, in an improper manner. The agency is assisted by an advisory committee of 12 members, appointed by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
The EPA has a wide range of statutory duties and powers under the Act. In addition, the capacity of the EPA in enforcement has been enhanced by powers contained in the Protection of the Environment Act 2003. The main responsibilities of the EPA include: licensing large-complex industrial and other processes with significant polluting potential; monitoring environmental quality, including the establishment of databases to which the public has access; publishing periodic reports on the state of the environment; promoting environmentally sound practices; promoting and co-ordinating environmental research; licensing all significant waste disposal and recovery activities, including landfills, and the preparation of a national hazardous waste management plan; implementing a system of permitting for the control of VOC emissions resulting from the storage of significant quantities of petrol at terminals; implementing and enforcing the GMO regulations for the contained use and deliberate release of GMOs into the environment; preparing and implementing a national hydrometric programme; drafting a national allocation plan for greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading; the establishment of a national competent authority for the issuing of trading permits and allowances; the monitoring, overseeing and verification of emissions from participating companies; and the establishment of a national emissions trading registry.
Under the Office of Environmental Enforcement which we established within the agency in 2003 and which is dedicated to the implementation and enforcement of environmental legislation in Ireland, the responsibilities are: to improve overall compliance with environmental protection legislation in Ireland; to raise awareness about the importance of enforcement of environmental protection legislation in Ireland; to enforce IPPC licences and waste licences issued by the EPA; auditing and reporting on the performance of local authorities in the discharge of their environmental protection functions, which include enforcement in respect of breaches of waste permits, taking action on illegal dumping, implementation of waste collection permits and enforcement of producer responsibility initiatives; taking action against local authorities that are not discharging their environmental protection functions in an adequate manner; prosecuting, or assisting local authorities to prosecute, significant breaches of environmental protection legislation in a timely manner; and assisting local authorities to improve their environmental protection performance, through the establishment of an enforcement network to promote information exchange and best practice and by the provision of appropriate guidance.
I will now address the three issues which the joint committee wishes to discuss today. Through its licensing functions, the Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for regulating activities which have the potential to cause significant environmental pollution. This is achieved through IPPC licensing of industry under the Environmental Protection Agency Acts 1992 and 2003 and the licensing of waste facilities under the Waste Management Acts 1996 to 2003. The licensing procedures under both sets of legislation are similar and along the lines of the planningprocedures. They require public notice by the applicant prior to making the application, the facility for third parties to make submissions on the application and a notification by the agency of its proposed decision. Following notification, there is a period for objections to be lodged, which objections may be heard through an oral hearing process or by a technical committee established for that purpose.
The licensing statistics are as follows:
|
IPPC
|
Waste
|
Applications received
|
757
|
277
|
Submissions on applications
|
2,922
|
11,893
|
Objections to Proposed decisions
|
543
|
368
|
Licenses granted
|
654
|
209
|
Licences refused
|
9
|
3
|
Applications rejected, abandoned, withdrawn or surrendered
|
47
|
27
|
Under consideration at present
|
47
|
38
|
All documentation relating to an application, apart from commercially sensitive material occasionally held as confidential at the request of the applicant, is made available on public files. The Environmental Protection Agency is moving to an electronic document management system for licensing and all applications, submissions and objections will be available on the worldwide web later this year. Currently, proposed decisions, reports of inspectors and technical committees and final decisions are available on the EPA website.
The Office of Environmental Enforcement, OEE, is responsible for the enforcement of EPA licences issued for waste, industrial and other activities. Enforcement is carried out under powers conferred on the Environmental Protection Agency by the EPA Acts, the Waste Management Acts, the Local Government (Water Pollution) Acts and the Air Pollution Act 1987. The OEE has developed an enforcement policy based on the principles of proportionality, consistency of approach, transparency, targeting of enforcement action and implementation of the polluter pays principle.
A range of enforcement tools are available to the Environmental Protection Agency up to and including prosecution. The Environmental Protection Agency and Waste Management Acts provide for the Environmental Protection Agency to prosecute summarily in the District Court. Indictable offences must be prosecuted by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Penalties available under the Acts are: on summary conviction, a fine not exceeding €3,000 or imprisonment for any term not exceeding 12 months or both; on conviction on indictment, a fine not exceeding €15 million or imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or both.
While in many cases a prosecution will be the ultimate sanction used by the Environmental Protection Agency, it may not always be the most appropriate course of action. There are a number of other instruments available to the agency in that regard. Inspections, monitoring visits and audits are carried out by a team of professional EPA staff. Warning letters, a written notification that in the opinion of the OEE an offence has been committed and setting out what is required to remedy the situation, are often effective in achieving the desired environmental outcome. A statutory notice which is legally binding may be issued under certain circumstances, for example, to revoke or suspend a licence issued by the EPA or to direct a local authority to take certain action. In some circumstances, an application may be made to the appropriate court for an order to cease causing pollution, including the cessation of the activity giving rise to the pollution and to mitigate or remedy the effects of such pollution.
In 2004, 17 prosecutions were taken through the courts and we have taken ten so far this year. A number of cases are being prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions. The following information concerns enforcement activities for 2004. Some 525 inspections were carried out on IPPC sites and 342 on waste sites. Audits were carried out at 222 IPPC sites and 52 waste sites. There were 1,027 monitoring visits at IPPC sites and 109 on waste sites. Seven statutory notices were issued to IPPC companies and one was issued to a waste company. Some 497 notifications of non-compliance were issued to IPPC companies and 221 were issued to waste companies. We instigated 14 prosecutions against IPPC sites and eight against waste sites.
I turn now to the issue of illegal dumping. Illegal waste movement and unauthorised disposal of waste is a major national issue which threatens not just the environment and public health but also Ireland's reputation abroad. This problem was exemplified by the large-scale illegal dumping that took place in County Wicklow during the period 1997 to 2002, and more recent revelations regarding the illegal movement of waste to Northern Ireland and overseas.
One of the first priorities of the Office of Environmental Enforcement when it was established in 2003 was to tackle these issues. While immediate steps were taken by the office to deal with these issues and significant progress is now being made, there was a paucity of information about the true nature of unauthorised waste activity in Ireland. For this reason, the OEE commissioned a study to establish the nature and extent of unauthorised waste activity in Ireland from 1996 to the present in order that it could formulate plans and actions to tackle the problem based on reliable information. This study is almost complete and the results, including an action plan to address the issues, will be published in September this year.
There is evidence that significant unauthorised landfilling of commercial and industrial waste and construction and demolition waste took place, mainly between 1997 and 2002 and primarily in the greater Dublin area. By far the greatest level of unauthorised landfilling during this period occurred in counties Wicklow and Kildare. Although there were initial indications in County Wicklow that up to 100 illegal sites had been used for unauthorised dumping, further investigation by Wicklow County Council resulted in the identification of a number of sites where unauthorised disposal of waste occurred in a planned and organised manner with the remainder mainly consisting of sites where waste had been fly-tipped.
Investigations are ongoing at the unauthorised sites and a number of cases have been dealt with by the courts or are currently proceeding through the courts. With regard to the sites in County Wicklow, investigations are under way, either by Wicklow County Council, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation or cases are with the Director of Public Prosecutions. Therefore the level of information that can be reported on these sites is limited, as we would not wish to compromise any prosecutions that may emerge.
The main priority of the Environmental Protection Agency in dealing with these sites is to conduct, or to have conducted, a risk assessment to determine the level of risk or potential risk to the environment and public health and to ensure the appropriate measures are taken which will result in the minimisation of risk and the remediation of the site. Many of these sites will need to be remediated under licence, and it is the job of the EPA to consider and decide upon applications for such licences.
On a more general note, the growth in illegal dumping is an undesirable feature of the past decade. The criminal practice of taking waste and dumping it in unlicensed and illegal sites, both within and outside of this jurisdiction, has allowed unscrupulous operators to make vast profits at the expense of the environment and of Ireland's reputation. There is no excuse for this type of activity. The EPA, in co-operation with other enforcement authorities, will pursue every available measure to stamp it out. The Office of Environmental Enforcement has made a real impact on illegal activities during 2004 with the establishment of the environmental enforcement network which harnesses the collective resources, expertise and investigative capacity of the local authorities, the Garda Síochána, the Northern Ireland Environment and Heritage Service and the Police Service of Northern Ireland. Enforcement activity was stepped up with two concerted enforcement actions undertaken, targeting in particular the illegal trafficking of waste to Northern Ireland. I am confident that prosecutions will follow from these actions and that there will be a further escalation of enforcement in 2005.
On genetically modified organisms, as I am conscious our colleague, Dr. Tom McLoughlin, has addressed this committee in the recent past, I have kept our presentation brief but we can elaborate further if the committee wishes. The EPA is the competent authority in Ireland for the implementation of the GMO regulations on the contained use and the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment. In practice this means that anyone who wants to use a GMO in a laboratory or a factory — contained use — or in a field trial which is deliberate release into the environment, must first obtain a licence from the Environmental Protection Agency. Other organisations also have responsibility for certain aspects of GMO regulation in Ireland. These include the Food Safety Authority of Ireland for food, the Department of Agriculture and Food for animal feed and the Irish Medicines Board for medicines. As one of the regulatory authorities in Ireland the EPA is neither for nor against GMO technology. The EPA maintains a register of GMO users in Ireland which contains details of the user and the GMO. Currently, there are 199 entries on the register.
The EPA assesses each application, using a combination of internal expertise and advice from both the EPA's GMO advisory committee and the GMO and novel foods sub-committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland's scientific committee. The EPA also consults Departments, other State bodies and experts in academic institutions for advice on GMO notifications and dossiers as necessary. The over-riding concern of the EPA in looking at GMO notifications or dossiers and in the implementation of the genetically-modified organisms regulations is to ensure their use does not have an adverse effect on human health or the environment.
Further information on all these issues, other areas of the EPA's responsibilities and all the EPA's reports are available on the EPA website.