The first item for scrutiny is COM (2003) 278 concerning the establishment of a programme to promote activities to protect the Community's financial interests. This is a technical measure giving a legal basis to the area of the EU's anti-fraud operations. The departmental information notes make clear that this change would have "no practical implications" for Ireland. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
The next item is COM (2003) 333 on persistent organic pollutants. This measure, which is scheduled for discussion at the Environmental Council in December 2003, if passed, will enable ratification of two international agreements which Ireland has signed. The use of these pesticides is currently banned under Community law, but their manufacture is not. The production of these pesticides will be banned as a result of this measure. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny at this time. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.3 refers to COM (2003) 349 regarding fisheries control measures applicable in the north-east Atlantic. The North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission brings together the EC and coastal states of the north-east Atlantic in a forum to encourage international co-operation and consultation regarding fishery resources in the area. In 1998, this commission adopted a scheme of control and enforcement measures which provided for control and reciprocal inspection measures for vessels which fish in NEAFC waters. The scheme was transposed into Community law by Council Regulation No. 2791 of 1999. At its AGM in November 2002, NEAFC amended the scheme to include vessels involved in transhipments and joint fishing operations. Community vessels will henceforth require permits to engage in such activities. These new regulations came into force in February 2003. There are a limited number of Irish vessels operating in the NEAFC area, and while the proposal will involve some additional control and enforcement activities by the Irish authorities, these will be of a relatively minor level. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.4 refers to COM (2003) 352, on the codification of the council regulation establishing the Cohesion Fund. The council regulation establishing the Cohesion Fund dates from 1994 and was amended twice in 1999. This single regulation will preserve the content of the 1994 regulations and its amending regulations in one measure. There are no changes of substance. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.5 refers to COM (2003) 384. This is a technical measure applicable to fishing activities in the north-east Atlantic on the conservation of Antarctic marine living resources. The Commission's responsibility is at the level of monitoring the inspectors. Irish vessels do not fish in the Antarctic region and this regulation, which transposes these technical measures, does not have direct relevance for Ireland. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.6 refers to COM (2003) 402 concerning the financial instrument for the environment, LIFE. LIFE, which was established in 1992, is one of the main planks of the EU's environment policy. LIFE co-finances projects in three areas: LIFE nature which is aimed at conservation of natural habitats and wild flora and fauna; LIFE environment which is aimed at implementing Community environment policy and legislation on the environment in European Union and candidate countries, and LIFE third countries which is aimed at actions concerning technical assistance activities for promoting sustainable development in third countries bordering the Mediterranean and Baltic seas.
In 2001 the Commission proposed a management committee, under Article 11 of the LIFE Regulation 1655/2000 to oversee the implementation of the LIFE programme. The Council rejected this approach and adopted a regulatory committee approach instead. The Commission appealed this decision to the Court of Justice who ruled in the Commission's favour. This measure implements the Court of Justice ruling changing the management structure from a regulatory committee to a management committee. The management of the programme by a management committee would allow the Commission greater direction over it. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.7 refers to 1.7 COM (2003) 407 on smoke flavourings used, or intended for use, in or on foods. This measure proposes that manufacturers of smoke flavourings will be required to have their products assessed for safety by the European Food Safety Authority. Only those smoke flavourings which have been assessed and authorised may be used by food manufacturers.
Members may recall when the original version of this proposal first came to the attention of committee in October 2002, the committee recommended that it did not warrant detailed scrutiny. One of the main amendments to the original proposal is that producers will now apply, via the national competent authority. The authority, the FSA in the case of Ireland, will be obliged to respond in writing to smoke flavouring manufacturers which had requested approval for products. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.8 refers to COM (2003) 413 on decentralised co-operation. Decentralised co-operation is an instrument of development aid, utilised by the EU to engage non-state actors in the formulation of development policy. Decentralised co-operation targets the non-state sector in order to create conditions for greater equity for the inclusion of the poor in the benefits of growth and for strengthening the democratic fabric of society. This mechanism supports the activities of trade unions, economic and social partners, local and municipal authorities, universities and the media. It also allows for the participation in international fora of decentralised actors to put forward their needs and to be consulted on development policy. This can particularly apply when official delegations from certain regions may be quite narrow in outlook.
The regulation that underpins this development aid instrument - No. 1659 of 1998 - is due to expire on 31 December 2003. The purpose of this current measure is to extend the 1998 regulation for a further three year period up to 31 December 2006. Under the terms of the current regulation, it is proposed to allocate a budget of €18 million to this measure over the period 2004-06. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Item No. 1.9 refers to COM (2003) 417 regarding control measures for the fishing of certain stocks of highly migratory fish. The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, ICCAT, and the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, IOTC, adopted control measures applicable to fishing for certain stocks of highly migratory fish in 2001. The stocks concerned are in the Atlantic, Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean. The EU, as a contracting party to these organisations, is obliged to transpose these regulations into Community law. This measure, amending No. 1936 of 2001, allows for the transposition of the 2001 and 2002 ICCAT and IOTC measures. These measures will require additional reporting by the national authorities to the EU, which forwards it to ICCAT, and stricter rules restraining the landing of species illegally caught. The Department has indicated that it is favourably disposed to the proposal. It is proposed that this measure does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.