Skip to main content
Normal View

Joint Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen debate -
Thursday, 4 Jul 2024

Decisions on Public Petitions Received

I propose that the petitions considered by the committee at this meeting and previous meetings may be published; and the replies from the Departments and other bodies may also be published. Is that agreed? Agreed.

We have three petitions for consideration today. P00035/24, on "Mogeely interim flood relief" is from Gleann Fia, Mogeely, County Cork, residents' association. It states:

While we wholeheartedly appreciate Cork County Council's attempts to respond to the scale of the problem for all of East Cork, we feel we can as a community assist in the solution for our area. There is currently a culvert under the Killeagh Road which becomes overwhelmed from water entering it from the woods on higher ground. The proposal is to hold any overflow of water at the lowest point of the land until levels drop in the stream across the road. As soon as the levels drop, it is proposed to release the water under the road in a direct line to join the Dower River which disappears into the cave systems and does not affect any other area downstream. The landowner has the equipment and expertise to complete this body of work and would only require your approval. This would ensure the safety of the wider community in Mogeely during heavy rainfall periods and not just Gleann Fia estate. This interim flood relief scheme will allow us to sleep at night and not worry about waking up to waist-height contaminated water and having to carry our babies out to safety again. The residents of Gleann Fia are continuing to live this nightmare every time it rains.

The secretariat wrote to Cork County Council seeking a response advising of its views within 14 days. A response was received on 17 May 2024 advising the committee to redirect the request to the Office of Public Works based on the ongoing collaborations between Cork County Council and the OPW to find appropriate solutions to the flooding.

The secretariat then wrote to the OPW on 22 May 2024 and received a response on 6 June 2024. I have seen that response and a lot of it is copy-and-paste. I know the area very well. Gleann Fia is somewhat unusual because the houses there are timber frame which means you cannot just put in flood gates and then point them back, like you do in businesses. There has to be another way found. I have requested a meeting with Cork County Council for about two weeks' time to discuss various flood-prone areas.

The committee recommends that the response from the OPW be published and forwarded to the petitioner for comment within 14 days. Is that agreed?

Our next petition is P00024/24, that 17 March be proposed as an international day of rest to the United Nations General Assembly. The petitioner wrote as follows:

Dear Oireachtas,

Having thoroughly scoured the 'International Days' currently recognised by the UN General Assembly I was surprised to note that there is no 'International Day of Rest' celebrated. Also, March 17th remains an unfilled international date.

Saint Patrick's Day is a day on which 'the faithful' are expected to attend mass and engage in rest from work and recreation. It is one of the most widely supported celebrations in the entire world so I feel it makes sense to mark and claim this day, internationally, in a secular way to strength Ireland's perceived ownership over this wholesome and globally inclusive sentiment.

As 'International Days' must be proposed to the UN General Assembly by member states I ask that our government put forward my petition’s proposal.

Is mise le meas,

Paddy Lynn.

The secretariat wrote to the Department of Foreign Affairs seeking a response within 14 days and received a response on 21 June 2024. The committee recommends that the response from the Department of Foreign Affairs be published and forwarded to the petitioner for information, advising him that in consideration of said response, the petition cannot be progressed further by the Joint Committee on Public Petitions and the Ombudsmen. Is that agreed?

The final petition for consideration today is P00045/24, a call to ban election posters in Ireland. The petition reads as follows:

We are advocating for a ban on the use of election posters throughout Ireland due to several compelling reasons.

Firstly, the environmental impact of these posters cannot be ignored; they contribute significantly to visual pollution and waste, adding to landfill burdens and consuming valuable resources.

Secondly, the cost efficiency of this practice is questionable, with candidates and parties spending substantial amounts on production, installation, and removal of these posters. By eliminating this outdated method, funds can be redirected towards more impactful campaign activities or community projects. Additionally, the aesthetic concerns raised by the proliferation of election posters detract from the natural beauty of our landscapes and urban areas, diminishing the visual appeal of our communities.

Embracing digital alternatives in today's technologically advanced era offers a more sustainable and effective means of reaching voters through platforms like social media, websites, and online advertising.

By signing this petition, you are endorsing a shift towards a more environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and visually appealing electoral process in Ireland, emphasizing the importance of sustainability and modernization in our democratic practices.

The petitioners contacted all local politicians in the Skerries area of Fingal for feedback, with no solution provided. The secretariat wrote to the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage seeking a response within 14 days and received a response on 25 June 2024. The committee recommends that the response from the Department be published and forwarded to the petitioner for comment within 14 days. The correspondence file on this is fairly substantial. Is that agreed?

That is agreed, but I will make a very brief comment, if I may. There are big changes going on in relation to the use of election posters. In every constituency, whether it be for local, national or European elections, more and more candidates are not using election posters. There is a timeframe within which candidates can put them up and must take them down and if they are not taken down in time, there are substantial fines. What the petitioners are calling for is happening in its own way. I do not know if it would be a good thing to ban posters outright because people are moving in a certain way anyway. There would also be consequences for small printing companies because if something like that were to happen, it would cost jobs. In general, I see change happening there. Quite a number of candidates, both within parties and independently, are deciding not to use posters.

I agree, Senator Murphy. My motto always was that less is more, especially as there are alternatives.

The proposal regarding the petition is agreed. That concludes our consideration of public petitions today. I invite members of the public to submit petitions via our online petitions portal at petitions.oireachtas.ie. A petition may be addressed to the Houses of the Oireachtas on a matter of general public concern or interest or an issue of public policy.

As there are no other matters that members wish to raise, the meeting is now adjourned.

The joint committee adjourned at 2.47 p.m. until 1. 30 p.m. on Thursday, 11 July 2024.
Top
Share