Skip to main content
Normal View

Joint Committee on the Secondary Legislation of the European Communities debate -
Wednesday, 26 Apr 1978

Shipbuilding Industry.

Thank you very much for accommodating me. On the shipbuilding industry report all I wish to say—you have had it in hands for some time now—is that at the last meeting Deputy Quinn suggested that the Irish Congress of Trade Unions might like to comment on it. We now have a letter from them stating that they do not wish to make a formal submission on the matter. Generally, while supporting the principle of co-ordination of aids to the industry, they would be concerned with the protection of employment within the shipbuilding sector. That is their response.

We have made two points in the draft report to which I would like to draw the attention of Members. First, we say that there is a minimum critical level of activity for shipbuilding in any country. We are about only at that level in this country and we do not believe that there should be any across-the-board proportional cutback just to satisfy a need for reduction in capacity in Europe as a whole. Therefore, in effect, we should be left alone. Second, in regard to representation on the Shipbuilding Committee which is being set up in the EEC to look at the reorganisation of the industry we say that the industry itself should be able to contribute to the Committee—without necessarily belonging to it, which would be a very big, unwieldy Committee. Those are the two points to which I should like to draw attention.

In view of the fact that Fóir Teoranta, on behalf of the Government, own 47 per cent of Verolme Cork Dockyard, do I take it that the draft report represents by omission, if nothing else, the Government's attitude also to the future of shipbuilding? Can I note the fact that we have no official comment from the Government in this regard?

No, I think they will never give us policy statements.

We have a company in which 47 per cent of the shareholding is owned through an agency by the Government and this Committee has received no opinion of any kind from the Government. I should like that to be recorded in the minutes.

We have received a comment from the shipbuilding interests themselves.

We have an opinion from the industry and we have had a memorandum from the Department responsible but we have not had direct access to the Minister responsible because Ministers do not come here and talk about policy. Deputy Quinn wishes it to be recorded in the minutes that this is an omission.

I do not want to be contrary about it. I wish it to be on record that neither the Minister nor a representative of his came or made a submission on Government policy.

The Deputy is not drawing attention to something unusual.

I aspire to the future.

Would it not be possible to solve this by the tactic of getting some of these reports discussed on the floor of the Houses?

That was the intention. We have looked for an opportunity to have debates on some of the Joint Committee's reports in the Houses.

It is suggested, for instance, in the draft report on youth employment, which is on our agenda, that this be done. Obviously, it will be a matter for discussion as to whether a report merits the effort of getting it on to the floor of the House for debate.

Do I take it that the draft report is otherwise agreed?

Paragraphs 1 to 13, inclusive, agreed to.

Draft Report agreed to.

Ordered: To report accordingly.

Top
Share