Skip to main content
Normal View

Joint Committee on the Secondary Legislation of the European Communities debate -
Wednesday, 13 Dec 1978

Commission’s Proposals on Certain Energy Matters.

Senator Mulcahy is unavoidably absent. He is abroad but on his behalf I am presenting his draft report to the Committee.

The Commission proposals which we examined in sub-committee and which are the basis of the draft Report fall into six main headings. These are:

(1) financial measures to promote investment in solid-fuel based power stations,

(2) financial measures for inter-Community trade in power station coal,

(3) support for joint hydrocarbon-exploration projects,

(4) overcapacity in the Community refining industry,

(5) financial support for projects in the solar energy sector, and

(6) adoption of a second four year Energy Research and Development Programme.

Some of the proposals will be of considerable benefit to Ireland and I will now refer briefly to them.

Because the construction cost of solid-fuel power stations are higher than those of oil-fired installations, the Commission propose to aid investment in new solid-fuel based stations. This will benefit the ESB Shannon Estuary installation and the peat-fired installations which are due to come into operation between 1983-85. The report sets out the grants to be applied and while no final figures have yet emerged, these should be considerable. However, the proposed regulation to subsidise the price of Community coal—which is higher than world prices—will have expired before the Shannon Estuary project comes into operation. While the regulation may be extended, we point out that Ireland could only benefit in that event to the extent that it used Community rather than third-counry coal. Whether we do or not will, of course, depend on relative prices at that time.

The Commission's proposal to provide support for hydrocarbon exploration projects is certainly significant for Ireland. The background to the Commission's initiative in this area is set out in the report and we point out that one of the four projects being considered for assistance relates to exploration work off the west coast of Ireland. The prospect of Community aid for oil exploration is welcome. It may interest members to know that at present imported oil accounts for nearly 75 per cent of our total energy requirements.

The Commission proposal to support solar energy projects as a step in exploiting alternative energy sources is again very welcome. We understand that Ireland will be submitting a project and the report contains some data on it. We trust the project will benefit from the proposal. Again, the Second Energy Research and Development Programme will also benefit Ireland. We gained substantial contracts under the first programme and we certainly hope to continue to benefit under the new programme.

The remaining proposal deals with action to solve the over-capacity in the Community's refining industry. One of the solutions proposed by the Commission is to ban the construction of new oil refineries. This is a solution which we as a Committee must reject. Our single oil refinery meets only 40 per cent of our requirements and in these circumstances we would strongly oppose any proposal that would limit our right to expand our refining capacity to meet our national requirements. Moreover, we believe that Ireland must retain the right to refine any produce that our exploration programme may yield.

It may also interest Members to know that there will be a meeting of Energy Ministers on 21 December and some of the matters we have referred to in the report will be on the agenda.

I hope I have summarised the main points of Senator Mulcahy's report and I commend it for adoption.

Do the Members want to comment on the report?

If we do discover oil with Community assistance is there any tie-up in relation to our disposal of the slurry?

The Quadrant 44 project off the west coast of Ireland is under consideration for Community assistance.

Does it carry conditions or restrictions that might not be acceptable to us?

I am informed that any grant we get will have to be repaid if we find oil. If we are given assistance for exploration and if we find anything, we have to give back the grants.

We do not have to give back the find, I hope.

This report to a considerable extent highlights the benefit of having a group such as this Committee under your chairmanship, Sir. It is just as well we are aware of the proposal to have a ban on the construction of new refineries. We should at all levels be taking steps to oppose it, in view of the problems relative to this country and the possibility of finding oil off our coast. I am delighted that we have had the opportunity of raising this matter here. It will reinforce all of us in our commitment to ensure that this proposal is not adopted.

The point of view of the Sub-Committee is that the Community were looking at it from a Community point of view which does not necessarily dovetail into what would suit us. There is a tendency within the Community to reflect any price rises in conservation programmes and they wish to adopt refining structures within the Community. That would not suit us. That is not the position in Ireland and we want to resist any proposals that the Commission might put forward on this.

In circumstances where we are refining only 40 per cent of our total requirements we should have a refinery. There are also other reasons that we should have a refinery. If we had a refinery of our own capable of refining our full requirements we could also produce the raw materials for an immense number of down-stream industries on the chemical side, and that is where the real employment is. It has been a great mistake over the years that we have not done that.

The fact that we are an island nation is one that the Commission will have to take into account.

If we are lucky enough to get oil ourselves the need for a refinery will be all the greater. As Deputy O'Keeffe points out, the fact that we are an island nation merits special consideration. We should not be confined to just one refinery if any new oil is found, as we hope will be the case.

Apart from the normal situation and the possibility of downstream employment there is the appalling situation we would find ourselves in were there to be some major catastrophe in the world such as a world war.

This legislation is not moving very fast in the Community either. It might be a long time before anything will be reached on it.

We will encourage dust to be heaped on this proposal.

Paragraphs 1 to 21, inclusive, agreed to.

Draft Report agreed to.

Ordered: To report accordingly.

As this is our last meeting before Christmas I would like on behalf of all of us to wish everyone a happy Christmas and that applies to the press as well.

The Committee adjourned at 4.45 p.m.

Top
Share