Skip to main content
Normal View

Joint Committee on Transport, Tourism and Sport debate -
Wednesday, 27 Mar 2019

Business of Joint Committee

I apologise for the delay in starting. Before we begin, I remind all members to turn off their mobile phones completely, please, as they may interfere with the recording equipment. The minutes of the meeting of 27 February 2019 have been circulated. Are the minutes agreed? Agreed.

I now turn to correspondence. The first item of correspondence is a letter which we issued as a committee through our clerk to Rea Walsh, corporate affairs and licensing director of the Football Association of Ireland, FAI, concerning the scheduled meeting with the joint committee on Wednesday, 10 April 2019. We were seeking clarification on certain matters and further information on other matters. The response which we got back was to have the meeting brought forward to 3 April. The committee has agreed to schedule a meeting on that date with Sport Ireland because Sport Ireland is the body responsible for governance, oversight and scrutiny of sporting bodies. The committee has agreed that our scheduled meeting with the FAI will proceed on 10 April, as planned. The committee, through our clerk, on 22 March requested three issues from the FAI. We sought confirmation as a matter of urgency on the date in early April when they FAI governance review would be completed and confirmation that the outcomes of that review would be brought to the attention of this joint committee well in advance of our meeting scheduled for 10 April.

It was also noted from public statements that the FAI is willing to meet the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Ross, and Sport Ireland to give more detail on a bridging loan from the chief executive to the association in 2017. We requested that full and comprehensive detail of this matter would be forwarded to the joint committee well in advance of the meeting which is scheduled for 10 April. We have not received any reply to that correspondence. We will now ask that the FAI would supply the information urgently and at the earliest possible opportunity to the committee, and well in advance of our proposed meeting on 10 April. That is the decision of the committee.

I will now turn to other correspondence. The next is No. 2019/419. It is noted in this correspondence that Mr. Ford said CIÉ is not covered by freedom of information, FOI. This is a letter from a member of the public. It is proposed that he would contact the Information Commissioner as regards the body in question. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Would it be a good idea for the committee to write to CIÉ or the Department asking it to investigate the details of the letter and to respond accordingly?

Of course. We should do that anyway, regardless of the FOI issue. Correspondence No. 2019/420 is an e-mail from the Minister, Deputy Ross, in reply to an e-mail from the clerk. It is proposed to note this correspondence. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/421? Is that agreed? Agreed. Correspondence No. 2019/422 is an email from Councillor Michael O’Brien who states that without prior consultation or notification to local commuters, Irish Rail decide to withdraw all staff from Clongriffin station on 16 February. We will forward that to Irish Rail for its comments on it.

Could we ask Irish Rail what changes have happened elsewhere as well and why?

Okay. We will.

It contradicts the recommendations that we as a committee had in the disability access report. It flies in the face of all of that. The manning of stations was a significant issue for many people. It was one of the main issues that came up. We could write to Irish Rail and the National Transport Authority, NTA.

The Minister is due to come in to report on that in three weeks’ time. We will copy that to him as well.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/423 a and b. The meeting has been scheduled for 8 May 2019. Is that agreed? Agreed. It is also proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/424 as that is also part of the meeting for 8 May. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/425 a to f, inclusive, in the context of our work programme and to schedule it as soon as possible. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/426 a to c, inclusive. Is that agreed? Agreed. It is an e-mail which I received from a number of people concerning a letter from Simon McNamara who is the UK and Ireland country manager of the International Air Transport Association. He is seeking a meeting with me as Chairman to discuss the Irish aviation industry and to look at possible ways of working together. I presume we will invite him in to the committee. We will schedule that in our work programme at the appropriate time. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/428 a and b, which was discussed earlier. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/429. It is an email from Deputy Rock and was discussed earlier. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Correspondence No. 2019/431 is another email to me as chairman regarding BusConnects, which is a matter for discussion today. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to note correspondence No. 2019/432 a and b. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Correspondence No. 2019/433 is an email from a member of the public who is concerned about the National Transport Authority and how it operates. I propose we forward the correspondence to the NTA. The matter is of particular concern. I note the representatives of the NTA are nodding in agreement.

I have a question on the work programme. We did some work at Christmas time on cycling. Is the Dublin Cycling Campaign scheduled for a hearing in the work programme? We identified it as one of the issues we want to address in the first half of this year.

It is a key part of the programme.

When are we likely to do it?

It will be after Easter.

Top
Share