I move:
Section 7, sub-section (1). After the words "the company and" in line 10 to insert the words "and sub-section (5) of Section 62 of the Principal Act is hereby repealed."
If we refer to Clause 5 of the Principal Act so called we find that it says: "Nothing in this section shall be taken to prohibit solicitors from taking such part as they have heretofore taken in proceedings analogous to any proceedings under this Act." The feeling is that this clause entitles solicitors operating in the Saorstát to represent patent agents not resident in the Saorstát, and to make their applications for patents and trade marks, and thus eliminate the necessity for those firms requiring protection for their patents or trade marks being represented by local patent agents. I think the general purpose of the Act is to protect and safeguard our own agents here, but a legal decision given comparatively recently makes it clear that the legal interpretation of the Act is not such. We want, as far as possible, to develop in this country a profession of patent agents and for the protection of our rights I think it desirable that such a profession should be encouraged. Patent agents will have to have technical knowledge and experience so that they may prepare a case for submission to the Patent Office. This clause in my judgment would eliminate the necessity for having patent agents in this country at all. We know that a very considerable amount of this business in connection with the protection of patents will be on behalf of large concerns across the water, and that in many cases these firms will entrust large firms of patent agents, with activities in various countries, with the protection of their patents and patent rights. In most countries they have either an office or a partner resident, or a citizen, at all events, of the State, who will present their case and act for their clients in that particular country.
Now with the insertion of this clause such a thing would not be necessary here. It would be sufficient for a firm of patent agents in London, New York, Berlin or Paris simply to prepare a brief, send it on to any local attorney and let him act for them. The result would be that in this country we would not be developing anything in the nature of professional experience in that matter, which the Act is out to provide. On that argument I feel that the clause might be deleted, so as to ensure the protection of the patent agents already operating here, and to prevent exploitation by foreign agents who would not need even an office in this country under the clause. It seems to me perfectly obvious, and I think the argument is sound, that such power should not be given foreign patent agents to make the operation so simple for them as it is made under Clause 5. I commend the amendment to the consideration of the House and to the Minister. The elimination of this clause will not inflict any particular hardship on any non-national registering patents or trade marks here. It will simply mean that he will have to use a citizen of the Saorstát to present the case for the protection of a patent right.