I move amendment No. 31:—
In page 30, line 17, before the word "provide" to insert the words "and if required by the Minister shall"; and in line 19 to delete the words "they think proper" and substitute therefor the words "may be reasonably necessary for the purposes of the harbour".
I assume that this amendment is going to be unpopular because it proposes to impose obligations on harbour authorities where they are reluctant to do what it is contemplated in this Bill they should do. The section provides that a harbour authority may provide, in connection with their harbour, sheds, transit sheds, silos, stores, etc. It appears to me that it is not sufficient, having regard to the interests of Irish trade and of Irish shipping, that a harbour authority may be given permission to provide these facilities. I want to ensure that the facilities will be provided where they are necessary. What I am proposing is that the section should be altered so as to read that the harbour authority may provide these facilities, or that they shall provide these facilities where required by the Minister to do so.
The phraseology that I am using is quite common in local government legislation, where the Minister authorises a local authority to provide a hospital, a mental hospital, a clinic or something else, at the same time taking the precaution, where he considers it necessary to do so, of saying that they shall, in fact, provide these amenities if called upon by the Minister to do so.
I may say that I am concerned mainly with two kinds of facilities: the provision of ordinary transit sheds and transhipment sheds. Strange as it may appear, in an island country such as ours, having all its external trade carried through its ports, and endeavouring to build up its own maritime marine, there is not one transhipment shed in the whole of Ireland. That seems to be absolutely inconsistent with our geographical position and our own ambitions, but it is explainable when we have regard to our history. The various shipping companies using our ports were built up on the principle that they were doing a coastal trade. They were just trading between England and Ireland, just as they might trade between London and Liverpool, and up till about 1923, these shipping companies had no other view in regard to this country except the view of a coast-wise trade. Goods were brought from abroad to England, and then brought here in ordinary cross-Channel steamers, and there was no transhipment. In those days, there was no question of quotas or licences. What I want to suggest is that if it is desirable to build up a maritime service in this country, it must develop on the principle that Irish ships will be able to take on a cargo at a foreign port for any centre for which the cargo is offered. Let us assume, for instance, that a ship is loading at Amsterdam, for the Port of Dublin; half of the cargo which is being shipped is being brought to Dublin, but there is also cargo lying at that port which is available for Glasgow or Liverpool. The master of that Irish ship can take on the Liverpool or Glasgow cargo in order to fill up his vacant space, if he is able to offer to the shippers the same facilities in Ireland that a British firm would be able to offer. In other words he can say: "I can take your cargo to Dublin, where it can be lifted from the ship, without the smallest package being opened or broken, and it will only have to lie there at Dublin for about 24 hours until a ship is leaving for Liverpool or Glasgow."
That is the principle that I am advocating, and it is in that connection that I say that proper shipping facilities and transhipment sheds are required, but we have no such transhipment sheds, and none of the shipping companies concerned have bothered their heads to provide any such facilities at any of our ports for that kind of traffic during the last 25 years. I suggest that it is not merely sufficient to put into this Bill a provision authorising a harbour authority to provide such a facility. I want a provision inserted in the Bill which will enable the Minister, if the circumstances so require, to demand that the harbour authority concerned will provide for such transhipment facilities. I do not want to go into all the details of the matter now, but I do think that if we are serious about foreign trade being carried in Irish ships, we ought to have transhipment sheds provided in, at least, the ports of Dublin, Cork and Galway. The same, of course, would apply to other ports, and I merely mention these three ports because it is obvious that they are the chief ports for which such facilities should be provided for other of course, may suggest that the same facilities should be provided for other ports, and I am not denying that; I am merely calling attention to these three ports as the greatest that we have in the country.
That is not all, but facilities provided at the majority of Irish ports for handling foreign cargoes are, to say the least of it, antiquated. For instance, goods are discharged at the Port of Dublin, and left on the quayside for weeks at a time, because there are no sheds in which to put them. Personally, I may say that I have seen flour lying on the quays in Waterford, because there were no sheds in which to put the flour. As a matter of fact, I think that there are no transhipment sheds in Waterford. In that connection I may say, that one company was compelled by the revenue authorities to spend £30,000 on the provision of a proper shed in Dublin, and that was quite proper, but all revenue officers are not quite so insistent on having proper provision made, and it is a fact that cargoes are often left lying on the quays at Dublin. Now, that is bad enough, so far as the cargo itself is concerned, but consider the effect on the consumer when a cargo is discharged and left lying on the quayside. If it cannot be put on the quayside, if it cannot be put under lock and key, then watchers must be provided, and these watchers have to do duty from 9 p.m. till 9 a.m. Naturally, these watchers have to be paid, and the cost of that goes on to the consumer. I have been informed that goods have been left on the quays of Dublin simply because of an ordinary hold-up by the revenue authorities. However, I shall not go into that. I think it is sufficient to say that it is extraordinary that goods should be left on the quays of Dublin simply because of the lack of proper and sufficient shedding accommodation, and I am proposing here that if the Minister considers that there should be transhipment sheds provided, he should have power under this section to see that such sheds will be provided.