Senators will appreciate that I made yesterday in the Dáil a carefully-worded statement in explanation of the Bill which is now before this House and that the statement I shall now make cannot be very different in substance. The purpose of the Bill is to enable the Government to comply with the request of the United Nations to contribute an Irish Battalion to the United Nations Force which is at present being constituted for service in the Congo.
The circumstances in which this request has been made to us are as follows. The Belgian Government, earlier this year, decided to grant the Congo its independence. The new Republic of the Congo became independent on 1st July of this year and immediately applied for admission to membership of the United Nations. The Security Council unanimously recommended that the Republic should be admitted to membership at the next session of the Assembly.
Almost from its inception, the new Congo state was confronted by serious internal difficulties and disorders, including local mutinies by some of its forces. There were attacks and outrages on civilians, particularly those of European origin, resulting in some cases in loss of life. In consequence of these regrettable incidents, the Belgian Government sent Belgian paratroops into the territory of the new Republic to protect the European residents from the dangers to which they were exposed.
In this situation, the Government of the Congo appealed to the Security Council of the United Nations and the Council took two decisions. In the first place, it called on the Government of Belgium to withdraw its troops from the territory of the Congo and in the second place, it authorised the Secretary General to take the necessary steps, in consultation with the Government of the Congo, to provide that Government with such military assistance as might be necessary until such time as, in the opinion of the Government of the Congo, the national security force of that country may be able to meet fully the task of preserving law and order.
Not all the members of the Council voted in favour of the Resolution but nobody voted against it. The Resolution represents therefore a positive decision of the Security Council of the United Nations. In accordance with this decision, the Secretary General has addressed his request to the Irish Government. In considering this request, the Government here had regard to the obligations which this country assumed when we became a member of the United Nations. Article 2 (v) of the Charter obliges all members to give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the Charter and under Article 25 all members of the Organisation agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council. Under Article 43, all members undertake to make available to the Security Council armed forces and other facilities necessary to maintain international peace and security.
We are naturally anxious that Ireland should honour her obligations under the United Nations Charter in the spirit as well as in the letter. The Charter provisions I have quoted are obviously pertinent to the request now addressed to us by the Secretary General. No doubt, in deciding which countries to invite to contribute to the force, the Secretary General had regard to the many difficulties of the present situation. Ireland has a record in the United Nations of trying to deal with world problems and issues on their merits and to arrive at fair and impartial conclusions with regard to them.
In the light of our obligations under the Charter on the one hand, and our national traditions and outlook on the other hand, it is safe to assume that this fact was fully present in the mind of the Secretary General in deciding to make his request to the Irish Government. In the situation that exists in the Congo, of which Senators are no doubt aware from Press reports, the United Nations Force there would be unlikely to succeed in its task if the national troops, of which it is composed, did not have the confidence of the parties immediately concerned. It may fairly be assumed that this consideration was a predominant one in the choice of the countries that should be asked to participate.
Four African States have already contributed contingents, and their troops are now in the Congo. Five other States, Ireland, Sweden, Yugoslavia, Haiti and Burma have been invited to participate and Sweden has already agreed. At least 20 other countries are contributing auxiliary services, transport and supplies. We hope that this great co-operative effort on the part of the world community will prove a valuable precedent for the future.
I think I should make it clear that during its service in the Congo, the Irish contingent will be under the orders of the Supreme Commander, General von Horn, who has been selected by the Secretary General under the authority given him by the Security Council. It will be acting on behalf of the United Nations, subject to the orders of the Supreme Commander and not to the orders of the Irish Government. It will be for the Supreme Commander and not for the Irish Government to determine the day to day measures and dispositions necessary to achieve the purposes of the Force.
The present situation in the Congo is, as Senators, no doubt, appreciate, extremely complex and its future development is unpredictable. Apart from the breakdown of the national security forces in that country and the consequent lack of protection for lives and property, internal political dissensions have developed between the different parts of the Congo which threaten the territorial integrity of the country.
The question naturally arises of the role, if any, the United Nations Force is intended to play in its political difficulties. The answer to that question was made public on Tuesday in an interim report made by the Secretary General to the Security Council. I quoted the relevant sections of that report to the Dáil yesterday but I think it is desirable that I should quote them again for the information of Senators.
There are three relevant passages as follows: first, "the Force introduced is to be regarded as a temporary security Force present in the Republic of the Congo with the consent of the Government"; secondly, "Although it may be considered as serving as an arm of the Government for the maintenance of order and protection of life —tasks which naturally belong to the national authorities and which will pass to such authorities as soon as, in the view of the Government, they are sufficiently firmly established—the force is necessarily under the exclusive command of the United Nations vested in the Secretary-General under the control of the Security Council". The third quotation reads: "The authority granted to the United Nations force cannot be exercised within the Congo either in competition with representatives of the host Government or in co-operation with them in any joint operation. This naturally applies a fortiori to representatives and military units of other Governments than the host Government. Thus, the United Nations operations must be separate and distinct from activities by any national authority. Likewise, it follows from the rule that the United Nations units must not become parties in internal conflicts, that they cannot be used to enforce any specific political solution of pending problems or to influence the political balance decisive to such a solution.”
In brief as these quotations make clear, the purpose of the United Nations Force in the Congo will be to act as an independent entity for the purpose of protecting lives and property wherever they are endangered in consequence of the inability of the Government of the Congo to ensure such protection from its own resources. The role of the United Nations Force will be limited to that task. It will have no role to play in any problem of a political nature in the Congo, existing or future.
The legislation now proposed for the consideration of the Seanad will be limited to a duration of six months. A permanent measure will be introduced later. Meanwhile, this Bill will authorise the sending of contingents of the permanent Defence Forces outside the State for duties of a police character in the United Nations Emergency Forces. No member of the Defence Forces will be liable unless he volunteers. Those who join the permanent Defence Force while this temporary Act is in operation will be liable to overseas service, subject to the terms of the measure as part of their conditions of service. As Senators will have seen from newspaper reports, more than the requisite number of volunteers has been forthcoming. There is no doubt that on a volunteer basis we shall be able to provide a Force which will do credit to the Army and to the country.
The Irish officers who served in the United Nations Observation Group in the Lebanon were spoken of in the highest terms in regard to the efficiency and devotion to duty they displayed. I am confident that the Irish contingent in the United Nations Force in the Congo will maintain that high standard, that they will live up to the traditions of the Irish Army and to our reputation as loyal members of the United Nations.