Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 3 Jul 1985

Vol. 108 No. 13

Adjournment Matter. - Airline Pilots' Strike.

I was appalled to hear on the radio the secretary of the Airline Pilots' Association state that not only were they going on strike for four days, with all its implications and at the cost of at least £4 million to Aer Lingus, but that they were going to have 24 hour-lightning strikes. All this came only 48 hours after their agreement had expired. As serious as the four day strike is, notice was given and the airlines had an opportunity of providing alternatives and the public were made aware of it. When we will have the lightning strikes the public may find themselves stranded for 24 hours in London or any other airport. These people might need to be back for a funeral or to come back to someone who is seriously ill, or may have no money at the end of their trip and they would have to find their own way home. They may have to find another place to sleep for the night. That is all because the airline pilots took it into their own hands to take this action. If retrenchment is forced on Aer Lingus then the obvious casualty will be the loss-making North Atlantic route which is costing about £20 million per annum, while the Irish Airline Pilots' Association captains are now earning £45,000 per year. In addition to that, they get $75 a day expenses free of tax plus their hotels and their food. Any contraction in the airline flight schedule will mean that the pilots jobs will be the first to go.

I doubt that all the 250 pilots have endorsed this latest version of "hijacking" as practiced by the association on the general public. We do not know if they had a meeting. We do not know if they had a vote. All we know is that the secretary of their association came on the radio and made these announcements. The reality is that the pilots are in dispute, not with Aer Lingus, but are on a collision course with the Government.

The Airline Pilots' Association were offered a special hearing by the Labour Court; they did not want it. The Airline Pilots' Association knew that at the end of the month a decision and guidelines would be given to Aer Lingus by the Labour Court. They could not wait until the end of the month. If industrial relations as practised by the airline pilots were to be emulated by the rest of the country's workforce we would have strikes right across the community involving up to about 100,000 workers. That is at least the number in the private sector whose pay deal under the 24th wage round has now run out and in some cases is stretching back to last November and not back 48 hours as in the case of the pilots.

In my view, whatever the reason, this action is utterly indefensible and politically motivated. I say politically motivated because they refused a Labour Court hearing; they refused to discuss the dispute with their employer, Aer Lingus; they wanted to discuss it with the Government. They wanted a Government decision and they would not take the normal course. It is very difficult to understand the contempt the 150 pilots and their association are showing not only for the travelling public but for the vital tourist industry and also for their 5,500 colleagues in Aer Lingus whose job prospects could be adversely affected by this unnecessary stoppage.

Over the next decade Aer Lingus will have to provide from £300 million to £500 million to replace their shorthaul fleet and the Government have put them on notice that they must fund this from their own resources. How can they fund anything from their own resources when they are losing money and when an opportunity to make money arises it is just thrown away? Not only will the pilots strike have that result but it will cost the airline £4 million. That is for a start. The tourist season in this country was just getting on its feet and it looked as if we were going to have a bumper season. That was judged from the bookings in various resorts, such as Killarney, where I come from.

As the Fine Gael Party spokesman in the Seanad for tourism I am making this case, but when I wear my other hat I am also involved in tourism. I have a fleet of self-drive cars and I have coaches and I know how I am going to be affected. My colleagues in the business all over the country are going to be affected. I know how the hotels are going to be affected. The public abroad were educated to come here and much of it was a spin-off from President Reagan's visit. Now, all of that is going to be destroyed.

The pilots who were originally based in Shannon for social reasons got transfers to Dublin. Naturally, they had families who were growing up and they had in Dublin educational and other facilities which they would not have in Shannon. Then Aer Lingus moved the major maintenance staff and equipment to Dublin. That was a big loss to Shannon. A spokesman at one of the annual dinners of the pilots' association proposed to overfly Shannon despite the fact that 65 per cent to 70 per cent of passengers disembark in Shannon. The pilots association — and I would not tar them all with the same brush because I know there are decent people in it, people who would not be part of this action but are somehow hooked on it and it has made them anti-Shannon, anti-west and anti-Ireland.

As Senators will be aware the Minister for Communications is occupied in the Dáil on the Transport Bill. I listened with interest to Senator Daly speaking about the four-day stoppage of the Aer Lingus pilots. The effects on the finances of the company, on the tourist trade as so graphically illustrated by Senator Daly, on the community generally and above all, on the travelling public are plain and are rightly deplored by all. The outstanding feature of the affair and the one commented on most widely has been the unseemly haste with which the industrial action has been undertaken.

As is well known the pay agreement for all categories of Aer Lingus workers, including the pilots, did not expire until 30 June and, in the ordinary progress of industrial relations, it would have been expected that discussion and negotiations would have been in progress for some period following the expiry date. However, a week before the expiry date the pilots' association took the unusual step at such an early stage of threatening a four-day stoppage. Despite intensive talks with the company, they could not be persuaded to call it off or at least postpone it. Not only that, but they also declined to accept a formal invitation from the Labour Court to a hearing of their claim on Saturday 29 June, almost in the teeth of the stoppage itself. It makes it all the harder to understand when one recalls that at the time a claim on behalf of a substantial body of the Aer Lingus workforce lay before the court, on which a recommendation is to be made before the end of the month.

In recent years Aer Lingus have been among the early starters on the wage round. This allied with the fact that their 24th round agreement ran for a shorter period than agreements in a number of other State bodies, means that they ended ahead of most other State bodies and also in the middle of the Aer Lingus peak traffic and tourist season. For a group such as the pilots' association to take industrial action just 24 hours after the expiry of their pay agreement shows an inexplicable disregard for and an unwillingness to give any consideration to the effect of such precipitate action. It is a pity that in this way the pilots should risk damage to the reputation which their high skill and professionalism have won for them not only among the community here but also abroad.

The pilots association have stated that Aer Lingus have been prevented by the Government from entering into negotiations on their pay claim. They have also indicated that even a 1 per cent token pay increase would have been enough to avert the strike. Formal guidelines for public sector pay have not yet been adopted by the Government. As I have already indicated, Aer Lingus were one of the earliest bodies to be dealt with in last year's pay round and many other settlements have still some time to run.

In the very difficult position of the Exchequer, the Government are most concerned about the pay bill of the public service, at present running at almost £2.5 billion, and could not willingly countenance any pay movement in the public sector that might prejudice their position in dealing with that problem. Also, as I have mentioned, the Labour Court are still dealing with a claim on behalf of a substantial body of the Aer Lingus workforce, and have indicated that they will be making a recommendation at the end of this month. In that situation, the Government could not approve of any offer of a pay increase to the pilots.

While the contingency plan mounted by Aer Lingus with such rapidity has helped in limiting the inconvenience to the travelling public, the dispute cannot but have a damaging effect. Some of these effects were outlined in detail by Senator Daly in his capacity as Senator and from his on the spot dealings with the tourist industry. It is not too late even at this stage to look for a limitation of the damage which this stoppage is causing. The most effective way of securing this would be if the pilots would call off their industrial action. This would be very much in the national interest as well as in the interest of the viability of their own airline. On behalf of the Government, I call upon the Aer Lingus pilots to reconsider their attitude and call off their industrial action and resume normal working. Such a move would, I believe, be welcomed by all sections of the community and would, I would hope, redress or at the very least limit the damaging effects of their industrial action.

The Seanad adjourned at 5.15 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 9 July 1985.

Top
Share