Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 4 Dec 1991

Vol. 130 No. 13

Adjournment Matter. - Drug Smuggling.

I thank the Chair and welcome my Cork colleague, the Minister, to the House. In dealing with this subject might I set the scene? Drugs are perhaps the greatest threat to the social fabric of our society. Drugs create an underworld which has a subculture of crime, persecution and torment. Our children are easy prey. It is important to understand the torment that is felt by parents and others in dealing with this subject.

In raising the matter, I am conscious of the fact that the incidence of drug smuggling has become increasingly alarming. I fear that the Customs service has not the necessary financial structure or indeed manpower to combat it. Garda reports over the years pinpointed Cork and south Kerry as areas with a tradition of smuggling. There have been finds in Courtmacsherry and £500,000 worth of drugs came ashore in Dublin quite recently. Over the last three years two kilos of cocaine were seized in Ringaskiddy, where a huge quantity of cannabis resin was stored in the roof space of a camper. I am aware that numerous postal packets have been intercepted. In Rosslare, for instance, several major seizures of drugs to the value of £500,000 to £1 million were made following searches of motor vehicles. Dublin Port handles cargo traffic, vessels and a passenger service. I am conscious of Dublin Airport and the trafficking of drugs through that location.

It gives me no pleasure to say this but it is important, as a parent and on behalf of parents, that this matter be raised in the House. There is inadequate Garda cover in west Cork. If one takes a line from Ring Pier in Clonakilty to Kenmare, there is one police car with three to four personnel. The shoreline has hundreds of inlets, numerous islands and there is a high incidence of marine activity. If we look abroad, particularly at EC countries with large coastlines, we see there is a network of coastal patrol which is supplemented by computer backup, aircraft surveillance and helicopters which will take on board a dozen men at a time. They are readily available. Take the Irish Sea, for example. My understanding is that we have one outboard dinghy based in Dublin which is not always available and in wintertime is not readily available to put to sea.

This raises the question of post-1992 and what is known as the European open borders policy. The EC theory is that all physical checks at point of import will be done away with. What is going to happen to passengers, good and vehicles? All we will be left with are spot checks. Will the Customs officials be in a position to mount effective spot checks?

Intelligence must be passed on and the ability to receive, store and distribute information must be of concern. Information must be acted upon effectively. Take the example of somebody flying out to Spain with $100,000 in his pocket. He is allegedly on holiday but is visited by a drug baron, drivers over the border and takes a flight to Frankfurt. From there he travels to Manchester, then to Dublin and from there to Cork. Have we the ability or the sophisticated equipment necessary to monitor the movements of drug barons, or what I would call the fraud-mongers, so that their life threatening arrival in Ireland can be encountered with an effective Customs response?

I understand that 90 per cent of seizures are taking place in this country at the moment. I hope Ireland is not a location for the shipment of drugs. In other words, I hope we are not seen as a soft touch — an easy spot in which to land with a low level of protection when compared to some of our EC partners. Surely our EC partners must be very uneasy at what they have termed as the ineffective response of the Customs service. Customs officers must feel that they face an impossible task. It must be bad for their morale. They need the support of extra resources and manpower and hopefully that manpower will be available post 1992. They also need the support of people who will inform them of unusual activities. In doing so, I would remind them, that would be acting on behalf of their children. If it is their child today; it could be mine tomorrow. Everyone of us, therefore, has a role to play.

It is important to look further afield at the street situation. We must ask ourselves if the drug phenomenon has permeated through society. Has it gone from urban society to rural society? Can it be found on the streets, on roads and on boreens? My contact with teenagers suggests that drugs are very readily available in public houses, in discos and restaurants. How many drug barons are apprehended? How many dealers are brought to task? That leaves us with a certain apprehension and fear for the future. How can these people be allowed to go unapprehended and to desecrate our young and beautiful society? It is the responsibility of the Garda to check the movement of drugs and to combat the sale of drugs. I understand their complaint is that very often when they want to mount or continue surveillance they are diverted into other albeit important areas.

I question the effectiveness of protection and control in restaurants and discos. How readily recognisable are the Drugs Squad? Is there an age barrier between those who protect and uphold the law and those who frequent discos and peddle drugs? My information is that members of the the Drugs Squad are recognisable. In the eyes of some of our EC partners we are seen as not having effective controls. Ireland is seen as a possible transhipment area in relation to other EC cities. That is a case that must be answered.

In the light of 1992 and the European open borders policy, it is in the interests of our EC partners, given our budget constraints, that structural funding through the social policy made available to ensure that we have proper resources, facilities and manpower. As a consequence the detection rate will be higher. That is imperative in an area that demands immediate attention. There must be nothing worse for a parent than a teenager who is hooked on drugs. We talk about the malaise of drink, but what is worse than to see your own child hooked on a drug that was readily available on the street and being able to do absolutely nothing about the scourge of drug taking? If we do not make every possible effort to stamp out smuggling and those people who peddle drugs and ruin the lives and beautiful future of our children, we will have to answer for it.

I thank my colleague for affording me the opportunity to participate in this debate. The Government are aware of the threat posed for this country by the illegal importation of controlled drugs. All aspects of drug misuse and measures to control trafficking in drugs at national and international level are dealt with in the Government's strategy to prevent drug misuse which was issued earlier this year.

At present, the Customs service represents the first line of defence against the illegal importation of controlled goods, including drugs. Within the Customs service sizeable resources are currently engaged exclusively on monitoring and detecting drug smuggling, organising special drugs operations and coordinating and exchanging intelligence information with the Garda Drugs Squad and with international agencies. Drug detector dogs are also used by the Customs service and the service has available to it modern drugs identification equipment and specialised X-ray equipment for the examination of suspect parcels and packages.

Customs staff receive comprehensive training in the identification and methods of detection of controlled drugs. Apart from the staff who have specific responsibilities in relation to combating drugs smuggling, the Customs preventative staff generally are also concerned with detecting illicit drugs trafficking as part of their normal duties.

The efforts of the Customs in the prevention of drug smuggling have been particularly successful in the Cork area in recent times, a fact that has been acknowledged by the Senator in his contribution and in moving the motion where a number of important detections have been made as a result of which people are now before the courts in relation to drug related offences.

The need to maintain fully adequate Customs resources for the task of preventing drug smuggling has been examined by the Revenue Commissioners in the context of the completion of the Single European Market on 1 January 1993. The commissioners recently published a report entitled "Single Market Impact on Staffing in the Customs and Excise Service". This report identifies a potential large surplus of Customs and Excise staff as a consequence of the Single Market provisions but the commissioners have also outlined proposals aimed at reducing the surplus figure. Specifically it is proposed that Customs should continue to play a major role in combating trafficking in drugs and other illicit goods considered a threat to society.

The abolition of frontier checks at borders between member states under the Internal Market proposals will focus attention on measures to protect the common external frontier against drug smuggling from third countries. In its control of the external frontier, each member state will be responsible for protecting the interests of all the member states against illegal imports from outside the Community. It is essential, therefore, that Ireland is seen to play a full part in combating drug smuggling and is not perceived as a soft entry point into the Community for the smuggler.

Adequate staffing resources will be deployed to ensure this as well as a number of structural and operational changes to meet the new situation. It is envisaged that specialist teams to combat drug smuggling will be based in important centres such as Dublin, Cork, Rosslare and the Limerick/Shannon area. These teams will undertake surveillance operations, including maritime operations, to ensure that measures against drug trafficking are effective in the new external frontier environment.

Also, in the context of the completion of the Single Market an expert group set up by the heads of EC Customs Services, on which the Revenue Commissioners are represented, is formulating an overall strategy to improve the effectiveness of customs control of drug smuggling at the external frontiers of the Community. This will include analysis of locations, routes and transportation methods which represent threats of drugs and other illicit goods entering the Community or transiting member states. The commissioners intend that sufficient staff resources will be deployed to enable the Customs service to react in a full and positive manner to the strategy agreed on by the expert group.

In the post-1992 situation mentioned by Senator O'Keeffe mobile surveillance using patrol cars will be strengthened. We have at present two maritime units and consideration is being given to acquiring further units. Surveillance using aircraft and sea-going vessels is also under consideration in the context of the post-1992 situation and the need to protect, as I have already mentioned, the external border of the EC.

On the question raised by Senator O'Keeffe about the south-west coast and the many inlets all around the coast of west Cork and Kerry, there is a strong emphasis in the west Cork and the Kerry Garda divisions on solving the problem of drug trafficking, and gardaí in both divisions in recent years have received training in drug law enforcement. In addition, four gardaí from each division have received specialist training this year and further gardaí from the area will receive such training if necessary.

I am, accordingly, satisfied that the Customs service are providing, and more importantly will continue to provide in the post-Single Market environment, a very effective defence against drug smuggling on the southern coast and in all other areas.

I thank the Minister for his comprehensive response and I thank you, a Chathaoirligh, for your patience.

The Seanad adjourned at 8.40 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 5 December, 1991.

Top
Share